450 NW Greenwood Ave Redmond - Property Development Pkg

DESCHUTESCOUNTYPROPERTYPROFILEINFORMATION

Parcel#:246088

TaxLot:151309DA01401

Owner:BlueSkyPropertyManagementLLC

CoOwner:

Site:450NWGreenwoodAve

RedmondOR97756

Mail:833NWFortClatsopSt

BendOR97703

LandUse:201-Commercial-Improved(typicalofclass)

StdLandUse:RMSC-ResidentialMiscellaneous

Legal:FAIRACRESADDITIONLot:26+PT27

Twn/Rng/Sec:T:15SR:13ES:09Q:SEQQ:NE

ASSESSMENT&TAXINFORMATION

MarketTotal:$1,908,340.00

MarketLand:$527,330.00

MarketImpr:$1,381,010.00

AssessmentYear:2022

AssessedTotal:$777,950.00

Exemption:

Taxes:$14,904.00

LevyCode:2-039

LevyRate:19.1581

SALE&LOANINFORMATION

SaleDate:09/30/2004

SaleAmount:$230,00000

Document#:58915

DeedType:Deed

LoanAmount:

Lender:

LoanType:

InterestType:

TitleCo:FIRSTAMERICANTITLEINSCO/OR

PROPERTYCHARACTERISTICS

YearBuilt:2006

EffYearBuilt:

Bedrooms:

Bathrooms:

#ofStories:

TotalSqFt:7,275SqFt

Floor1SqFt:

Floor2SqFt:

BasementSqFt:

Lotsize:0.50Acres(21,780SqFt)

GarageSqFt:

GarageType:

AC:

Pool:

HeatSource:

Fireplace:

BldgCondition:

Neighborhood:001

Lot:26+PT27

Block:

Plat/Subdiv:FairAcresAdd

Zoning:C2-CentralBusinessDistrictCommercial

SchoolDist:2J-Redmond

Census:4005-000800

Recreation:

SentryDynamics,Inc anditscustomersmakenorepresentations,warrantiesorconditions,expressorimplied,astotheaccuracyorcompletenessofinformationcontainedinthis report

Deschutes County Property Information

Report Date: 8/25/2023 4:17:32 PM

Disclaimer

The information and maps presented in this report are provided for your convenience. Every reasonable effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the data and associated maps. Deschutes County makes no warranty, representation or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any of the data provided herein. Deschutes County explicitly disclaims any representations and warranties, including, without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Deschutes County shall assume no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in the information provided regardless of how caused. Deschutes County assumes no liability for any decisions made or actions taken or not taken by the user of this information or data furnished hereunder.

Account Summary

Account Information

BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

833 NW FORT CLATSOP ST

BEND, OR 97703

Subdivision:

Block: 26 + PT 27 Lot:

Property Class: 201 -- COMMERCIAL

Warnings, Notations, and Special Assessments

Current Assessed Values:

Maximum Assessed Assessed Value

Veterans Exemption

Review of digital records maintained by the Deschutes County Assessor’s Office, Tax Office, Finance Office, and the Community Development Department indicates that there are no special tax, assessment or property development related notations associated with this account. However, independent verification of the presence of other Deschutes County tax, assessment, development, and additional property related considerations is recommended. Confirmation is commonly provided by title companies, real estate agents, developers, engineering and surveying firms, and other parties who are involved in property transactions or property development. In addition, County departments may be contacted directly to discuss the information.

Tax Payment History

Land Characteristics

Ownership

Related accounts apply to a property that may be on one map and tax lot but due to billing have more than one account. This occurs when a property is in multiple tax code areas. In other cases there may be business personal property or a manufactured home on this property that is not in the same ownership as the land.

Development Summary

Service Providers Please contact districts to confirm.

Permit Detail

of

SIGN: PEAK PERFORMANCE - IVR NUMBER = 711100023992 ~ IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821

RELOCATE EXISTING FREE STANDING SIGN: PEAK PERFORMANCE - IVR NUMBER = 711100023992 ~ IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821

IS READY FOR P/U-FILED IN ROLLING BIN UNDER "I"

APPROVED; SIGN <MAX SF; FWD TO BLDG FOR REVIEW

Building Permit Details

BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

Building Permit Details

Permit Number: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (PEAK PERFORMANCE)

711-FS66

Permit Name: SEVERSON PLUMBING MECHANICAL INC Contractor:

Inspections

Init. Comments

RWW 1720 Fire Sprinkler Final -- Insp Completed : Approved 01/30/2007 CEW 5793 SF X 2.14 = 12,397.00

01/30/2007 CEW PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED

01/30/2007 CMA COMPLETED PLAN TO COR

01/30/2007 JMA RCV'D PLANS FROM CDD/B

01/11/2007 JMA SPW DAVE RE: FS STATUS/SENT EMAIL TO CHRISTINE FOR UPDATE (DAN ON VACATION) TRACI APPROVED REVISIONS ON 12/29/06

01/04/2007 JMA RCV'D APPROVED REVISED PLANS FROM FIRE/REVISIONS PENDING CDD-B

01/03/2007 RFG RCVD APPROVED FS FROM FIRE DEPT. FORWARDED TO JACKIE TO FINALIZE ROUT'G PROCESS.

12/29/2006 TGC SUPPLY LINE RELOCATED; NO DETRIMENTAL EFFECT TO ORIG. APPROVED DESIGN DATED 4/18/06. PER TRACI, REVISED DESIGNS ARE TREATED AS ADDENDUM TO ORIG. APPROVED SET.

11/28/2006 CMA CDDRDM PLANS IN CDDB OFFICE FOR REVIEW

11/22/2006 JMA RECEIVED REVISED FS PLANS/FWD 2 TO CDD-B/FWD 1 TO TRACI COOPER

11/22/2006 KLB RCVD REVISED FS PLANS; PLACED PERMIT IN PENDING STATUS AND FWD TO JACKIE FOR ROUTING (ORIGINAL FS WAS ISSUED 5/26/06)

05/23/2006 KLB SPW LYNN @ SEVERSON -- ADVISED PERMIT IS READY AND AMOUNT OWING

05/19/2006 TGC REVIEWED SPRINKLER CALCULATIONS.

05/04/2006 RAK I 1.3 FIRE SPRINKLER 5,793 SQ.FT. @ $2.14= $12,397.00

05/04/2006 RAK PLANS TO CDDRDM

04/17/2006 RAK AWAITIING FOR BUILDING PLANS FROM WINSTEAD FOR SQ. FT. & OCCUPANCY.

04/12/2006 DAN PLANS TO CDDB DAN

04/11/2006 JMA RECEIVED REVISED PLANS/FORWARDED ONE SET TO TRACI AND TWO SETS TO CHUCK WOOLSEY

03/28/2006 JMA RECEIVED FS APP/W 3 SETS/FORWARDED TO KATIE

03/28/2006 KLB RCVD APPLICATION; FORWARD ONE SET TO FIRE AND TWO SETS TO BLDG

Building Permit Details

Permit Name:

711-B61648

Permit Number: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MGMT, PEAK PERFORMANCE

HAVNIEAR CONSTRUCTION CO LLC Contractor:

Commercial Building Class:

Class of Work:

PHYSICAL THERAPY OFFICE:PEAK

PERFORMANCE - IVR NUMBER = 711100019446 ~

IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821

PHYSICAL THERAPY OFFICE:PEAK

IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821 Building Use:

PERFORMANCE - IVR NUMBER = 711100019446 ~

Inspections

Date Init. Comments

01/24/2023 JMOO N

• Permit documents kept in CDD file room until ready for destruction. C of O is viewable in DIAL.

06/11/2010 PMT DAVID P IS WORKING ON ANOTHER PERMIT FOR PHYSICAL THERAPY ASKED ME TO LOOK UP THIS PERMIT & CONFIRM WHAT WE CHARGED ON SDC'S FOR TRANSPORATION THERE ARE NO NOTES EXPLAINING THE FEE WE CHARGED SO PULLED BLDG FILE FROM ARCHIVING ROOM TO LOCATE DETAILS.

08/06/2009 PMT FOUND A FILE W/COPIES OF ON SITE SPRINKLER/ALARM TEST INFO FROM FIRE,FILED THE TEST FOR THIS PROJECT IN BLDG FILE.

05/07/2009 PMT REC FOUR BACK FLOW TESTS FROM DAVID DOERR CCB#169877,SENT ORIGINAL TO PW'S FOR REVIEW & EMAILED COPY TO DUSTAN. COPY IMAGED FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.

Deschutes County Property Information Report, page 5 (For Report Disclaimer see page 1)

PMT REC A CALL FROM RION W/ WELLS FARGO BANK ASKING FOR COPY OF COFO PH#602-523-1972 FAX#602-528-9421. FAXED COPY & IMAGED COFO FOR FUTURE REFERENCE.

06/04/2007 JMA ALL PERMITS FINALED/FILE TO ARCHIVE ROOM

06/01/2007 JMA ISSUED COFO,FWD TO GARY LAMPELLA FOR SIGNATURE 06/01/2007 JMA PER CARL ISHAM OKAY TO ISSUE COFO

PMT REC EMAIL FROM ENG THAT SAYS:As soon as they provide their warranty security and their signed and notarized warranty agreement, engineering will be able to approve their C of O.

PMT EMAILED JEAN,SEAN,TRACI,JEN & CARL TO SEE IF OK W/COFO.

FROM NO GREATER THAN 12" FROM END OF SPLICES. -- Insp Completed : Approved with Conditions

12/15/2006 RWW 1260 Framing -- Insp Cancelled : Information Only

12/15/2006 RWW 1530 Exterior Shearwall -- Insp Cancelled : Information Only

10/05/2006 RWW 1150 Slab/Flatwork -- Insp Cancelled : Information Only

09/08/2006 PMT CALLED DAVE JASPER $50.00 1 HR MIN PLAN REVIEW FEE TO BE CHARGED,CALLED LM ON VM,PLAN IS IN THE PICK UP BOX UNDER H FOR HAVNIER.

09/08/2006 PMT CALLED SPW RICHARD ADV PER GARY OK FOR INSPECTION TODAY HE RECEIVED THE LETTER FROM ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SO PLANS ARE NOT ON SITE BUT SHOULD BE OK.

09/08/2006 PMT DAVE JASPER IN OFFICE THEIR WAS A CHANGE TO PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO WINSTEAD BUT DIDN'T GET INCORPORATED ON PLAN,HE NEEDS TO BRING IN 2 COPIES OF PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF POOL,2 NEW FLOORS & FOUNDATION PLANS,THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS DO NOT HAVE A STAMP FROM ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SO DAVE WILL GET A LETTER FROM THEM & HAVE THEM SENT TO ME SO GARY WILL REVIEW THE PLANS ON THE POOL.GARY SPW DAVE AT THE COUNTER.

09/08/2006 PMT DAVE JASPER SUBMITTED THE REVISED PLANS FOR POOL,FLOOR PLAN,FOUNDATION & CONSTRUCTION PLAN GAVE TO GARY TO DO REVIEW,STILL NEED LETTER FROM ENGINEER HE IS GOING TO HAVE THEM EMAIL OR FAX IT TO US AS SOON AS HE CAN GET THEM TO.

09/08/2006 RFG REC'VD ENG. CONFIRMATION THAT REVISIONS WERE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY MSS INC, ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS BUILDING CONTRACTORS PLANNERS. FORWARDED TO PMT TO MARRY UP W/BLDG FILE.

08/29/2006 KLB SPW JESSICA; AS LONG AS FH IS IN AND INSPECTED, FULL PERMIT OK

08/29/2006 KLB SPW JIM @ HAVINEAR; WILL HAVE SOMEONE PICK UP PLANS

08/23/2006 JMA SPW JIM @ HAVNIEAR, HE WILL P/U UP JOB SITE PLANS

08/22/2006 JMA TOM JACOBSEN RETURNED ANOTHER SET OF BLDG PLANS/JOB SITE SET

08/21/2006 PMT WAS LOOKING FOR PLANS NOTICED NOTES THAT SAID WE SENT PLANS TO TOM FOR REVIEW OF ELECTRICAL,CALLED TOM HE IS DONE WITH PLANS WILL BRING THEM BACK.

08/21/2006 RFG TOM JACOBSEN RETURNED APPROVED BLDG PLANS TO FILE BACK INTO BLDG FILE.

07/25/2006 RFG FORWARDED THE (2) APPROVED BLDG SET OF PLANS TO TOM JACOBSEN FOR ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. PLACED THE BLDG FILE BACK INTO THE INCOMPLETE BIN. LEFT MESSAGE FOR TOM J/PLANS PLACED IN HIS REVIEW BIN.

07/11/2006 CGI STEVE WILSON HAS APPROVED PER TWO CONDITIONS REDLINED ON PLANS AND DISCUSSED WITH JOHN SEADERS THE DESIGN ENGINEER

07/11/2006 PMT CALLED DAVE JASPER ADV PERMIT IS READY & AMT OWING,ALSO CALLED JOHN SEDARS ADV PERMIT & AMT OWING.

07/07/2006 JMA RECEIVED 2 SETS OF REVISED PLANS/FORWARDED TO ENGINEERING

06/28/2006 PMT ENGINEER ON RECORD CALLED SAID HE RECEIVED INFO FROM DAVE JASPER ON ISSUES,ADV HE NEEDS TO CONTACT CARL ISHAM & HE SAYS THERE ARE NO ISSUES SO HE WILL GET IT RESOLVED THROUGH ENGINEERING.

06/27/2006 CGI CIVIL DESIGN HAS ISSUES AND IS NOT APPROVABLE. SITE DESIGN SHOWS DRAINAGE ONTO CITY STREET, AND RETENSION PONDS ARE UIC'S THAT MUST BE REGISTERED AND APPROVED BY DEQ, DESIGN ENGINEER HAS NOT PROVIDE DRANIAGE CALCULATIONS FOR PONDS/UIC'S

06/27/2006 PMT EMAILED DAVE JASPER ON OUTSTANDING ISSUES PER NOTES FROM ENGINEERING.

06/27/2006 RFG PLACED BLDG FILE IN INCOMPLETE BIN.

06/26/2006 PMT EMAILED STEVE W & CARL IN ENGINEERING ASKING THEM TO ADV WHEN ENGINEERING IS OK TO ISSUE THIS PERMIT,FILED FILE IN INCOMPLETE BIN WAITING FOR ENGINEERING SIGN OFF. WILL FU 06/28.

06/23/2006 KSC PLANNING APPROVES

06/23/2006 PMT EMAILED SEAN PLANNER TO SIGN OFF ON THIS PERMIT IF OK,WE GAVE HIM THE ACCESS AGREEMENT ON 6/13.

06/23/2006 TGC Foundation only - ok until water and access are functional

06/22/2006 JMA RECEIVED ENGINEERING PLANS FROM CDDB/FORWARDED TO ENGINEERING FOR REVIEW

06/21/2006 PMT RANDY FROM CO SAID HE DOESN'T THINK PLANS THEY REC WERE FOR BLDG PLANS,ACTUALLY PREV NOTES SAY WE WERE WAITING FOR ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ENGINEERING,ASKED HIM TO PLEASE RETURN PLANS SO WE CAN FORWARD TO ENGINEERING.

06/21/2006 RAK ROUTED BACK TO CDDRDM

06/21/2006 RAK ROUTED TO RAK CDDB

Deschutes County Property Information Report, page 6 (For Report Disclaimer see page 1)

06/20/2006 DAN CDDRDM PLANS TO CDDB OFFICE

06/19/2006 RFG REC'VD (3) FULL SETS OF ENGINEERING DRAWINGS W/FIRE FLOW CALC'S. PLACED IN COUNTY REVIEW BIN.

06/13/2006 KLB RCVD SHARED ACCESS AGREEMENT; FORWARD TO SEAN

06/12/2006 GYB PLANNING APPROVAL PENDING, NEED SIGNED SHARED ACCESS AGREEMENT

06/06/2006 PMT TALKED TO DAVE JASPER ADV WE NEED AN APPROVED SET OF DRAWINGS FOR ENGINEERING BEFORE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT,HE SAID ENGINEER IS WORKING ON IT,ALSO NEED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,FIRE IS OK W/FOUNDATION ONLY.

06/05/2006 CGI DESIGN ENGINEER HAS NOT SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING THE REQUIRED REVISED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN. NO APPROVAL UNTIL RECEIPT OF ACCEPTABLE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DESIGNS.

06/02/2006 PMT SENT PLANS TO ENGINEERING TO SIGN OFF ON THIS PERMIT IF OK FOR PERMIT.

06/02/2006 TGC HYDRANT HAS NOT BEEN INSTALLED PER JASPER HE IS WAITING ON APPROVAL FROM ENGINEERING FOR UNDERGROUND IMPROVMENT APPOVAL

06/01/2006 RAK B OCC. V-B CONST.5,793 SQFT @ $70.80 X 97% = $68.70 = $398,100.00ROUTED TO CDD RM

06/01/2006 RAK PLANS TO RAK CDDB

06/01/2006 RFG COUNTY RETURNED APPROVED BLDG PLANS. ROUTED (1) SET TO ENG AND 2ND SET TO PLANNING.

06/01/2006 RFG PLACED PLANNING COPY IN FIRE REVIEW BIN. SENT E-MAIL REQUEST TO BOTH TRACI/JESSICA.

06/01/2006 RFG PLANNING COMMENTED THAT THE FINDINGS & DECISION WAS SENT OFF 05-31-06.

05/31/2006 DAN PLANS TO WINSTEAD

05/30/2006 DAN PLANS TO CDDB

05/22/2006 PMT CO SAID THE PLAN REVIEW IS STILL ON HOLD,ASKED THEM TO CLARIFY IF THEY REC THE INFO THAT THE ENGINEER SUBMITTED,DAN CB ADV THEY DID REC LAST FRIDAY,I CALLED DAVE JASPER & ADV,ALSO ADV PLANNING APPR NOT DONE YET.

05/18/2006 PMT DAVE JASPER WAS IN THE OFFICE CHECKING ON STATUS SAID HE PROVIDED INFO REQUESTED TO WINSTEAD SEVERAL WEEKS AGO,EMAILED DAN HORTON TO FIND OUT STATUS.

05/18/2006 PMT REC COPY OF TROUBLE LETTER WINSTEAD MAILED 04/24,CALLED WINSTEAD TO FINDOUT IF THEY RECEIVED INFO THE CONTRACTOR SAYS THEY MAILED. SPW

04/24/2006 DAN WINSTEAD SENT TROUBLE LETTER TO JOHN SEADERS, PE.

04/18/2006 JMA RECEIVED 2 SETS OF LOAD ANALYSIS

04/12/2006 DAN PLANS TO WINSTEAD ASSOC.

04/11/2006 PMT DAN HORTON AT DES CO HAS THIS FILE FOR PLAN REVIEW.

03/29/2006 JEC No sub infa @review

03/27/2006 RFG FORWARDED ORIG. APPLICATION W/(2) FULL SETS OF STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, & PLUMBING W/CIVIL DRAWING TO CHUCK WOOLSEY.

03/22/2006 JMA RECEIVED 3RD FLOOR PLAN FOR SCANNING

Electrical Permit Details

Permit Number: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

Building

Class

711-E100765

Permit

Description:

Name:

Building Class:

PEAK PERFORMANCE

THERAPY OFFICE: 5793 SF -

IVR NUMBER = 711100021815 ~ IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821

Service Description: Inspections Date Init. Comments 12/10/2007 GTJ 4500 Rough Electrical -- Insp Cancelled : Denied 05/24/2007 GTJ 4999 Final Electrical -- Insp Completed : Approved 05/22/2007 GTJ 4999 Final Electrical**SEE CORRECTION NOTICE AT JOB SITE 1. IDENTIFY SERVICE DISCONNECTS-110.22. 2. MAX OCP TO 15 AMP WASH MACHINE RECEPTACLES IS 15 AMPS 210.21. 3. FYI-NFPA 72 REQUIRES FACP BREAKER TO BE IDENTIFIED RED & A LISTED "LOCK-ON" DEVICE BE UTILIZED ON BREAKER. 4. PROVIDE NUMBERS/IDENTIFY BREAKERS ON 400 AMP PANEL BOARD 408.4. 5. PROVIDE GFCI PROTECTION FOR RECEPTACLE IN DRESSING ROOMS/BATHROOM, MENS 210.8. 6. BOND SPRINKLER PIPING TO GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR 250.52. 7. EMERGENCY UNIT LIGHTING EQUIPMENT TO BE ON UNSWITCHED LIGHTING CIRCUIT IN AREA THAT ILLUMINATES THAT AREA 700.12(F). 8. PERMIT REQUIRED FOR STEREO/AUDIO WIRING 918-309-0000, WIRING TO BE SUPPORTED TO STRUCTURE AND MAY NOT LIE ON CEILING TILER. PROVIDE LADDER FOR NEXT INSPECTION TO VERIFY SUPPORT METHODS. 9. PROVIDE LISTED WIRING BETWEEN STEREO/AUDIO AND EXTERIOR ANETTENNA 725.82 -Insp Cancelled : Denied

03/14/2007 GTJ 4500 Rough Electrical**INSPECTION COMMENTS: DROP CEILING -- Insp Completed : Approved

03/05/2007 GTJ 4140 Underground Electric**INSPECTION COMMENTS: UNDERGROUNDS TO HVAC PAD APPROVED -- Insp Completed : Approved

01/11/2007 GTJ 4500 Rough Electrical**SEE CORRECTION NOTICE AT JOB SITE WALL COVER AND SERVICE APPROVED. 1. PERMITS REQUIRED FOR HVAC AND SECURITY WIRING. -- Insp Completed : Approved with Conditions

09/25/2006 GTJ 4700 Hot Tub/Spa/Pool -- Insp Cancelled : Information Only

08/21/2006 AEG RECVD CONTRACTOR COPY FROM TOM ENTERED FEES

08/21/2006 AEG SPW REYNOLDS ELEC;ADVISED PERMIT READY FOR PICKUP AMT OF 810.64 DUE;PLACED IN ROLLING BIN 'R'

08/08/2006 JMA I ALSO HAD PAUL COMPLETE NEW E PERMIT APP W/HIS SIG FOR OUR FILE

08/08/2006 JMA PAUL REYNOLDS CHANGED E CONTRACTOR FROM HHD TO REYNOLDS/HE BOUGHT HHD AND IS NOW REYNOLDS ELECTRIC

07/25/2006 RFG FORWARDED (2) APPROVED BLDG SETS WHICH INCLUDED THE ELECTRICAL PLANS.

Electrical Permit Details

Permit Number: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, (PEAK PERFORMANCE)

711-E91521

Permit Name: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, (PEAK PERFORMANCE)

Contractor:

Commercial Building Class: PHYSICAL THERAPY OFF; TEMP & INSPECTION - IVR NUMBER = 711100021776 ~ IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821

Class of Work:

Service Description:

Inspections

No inspection records found.

Land Use Permit Details

Permit Number: Virgil Carnahan

711-14-000225-S

Request: Wall sign No

Conservation Easement Required: Conservation Easement Recording Number:

PHYSICAL THERAPY OFF; TEMP & INSPECTION Building Use: Linked Permit:

Conservation Easement Description:

Conservation Easement Comments:

Mechanical Permit Details

Permit Number: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MGMT

711-M35311

Permit Name: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MGMT Contractor:

Commercial Building Class: 5793 SF PHYSICAL

Class of Work:

Building Use: Linked Permit:

THERAPY OFFICE - IVR NUMBER = 711100019480 ~ IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821

Service Description:

Inspections

No inspection records found.

Error: Subreport could not be shown.

Plumbing Permit Details

Permit Number: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MGMT

711-P29702

Permit Name: BLUE SKY PROPERTY MGMT

Commercial Building Class: 5793 SF PHYSICAL THERAPY OFFICE - IVR NUMBER = 711100019470 ~ IVR PHONE = 1-888-299-2821

Class of Work: Linked Permit:

AND NUMBER OF CROSS SECTIONAL AREA OF VENT (S)

ROOF

PER ORSC

P3104.1 OR OPSC SECTION 904.1 PLUMBER WILL EXTEND 1 1/2" VENT @ DRINKING FOUNTAIN THROUGH ROOF TO MEET VENTING REQUIREMENTS -- Insp Cancelled : Denied

CALLED RANDY K AT CO THERE WAS NOT A PLAN REVIEW DONE ON THIS PERMIT,ADV WHAT WAS LISTED ON SUPPLEMENTAL INFO SHEET & HE ADV OF WHAT CODES TO USE,ALSO, HE DIDN'T ADV OF SEWER & WATER LINE OR STORM DRAIN,CHECKED PLANS THEY HAVE LESS THAN 100' WILL ADD THOSE CODES.

STATEMENT OF TAX ACCOUNT

REAL PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT

JULY 1, 2022 TO JUNE 30, 2023

DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON - 1300 NW WALL ST STE 203, BEND, OR 97703

TAX BY DISTRICT

TAX ACCOUNT: 246088

BLUE SKY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

833 NW FORT CLATSOP ST BEND OR 97703

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

CODE: 2039

SITUS ADDRESS: MAP: 201 CLASS: 151309-DA-01401

LEGAL:

FAIR ACRES ADDITION 26 + PT 27

VALUES: REAL MARKET (RMV)

Full Payment with 3% Discount

Discount is lost after due date and interest may apply PAYMENT OPTIONS:

* Online

www.deschutes.org/tax

* By Mail to Deschutes County Tax, PO Box 7559 Bend OR 97708-7559

* Drop Box located at 1300 NW Wall Street, Bend or 411 SW 9th Street, Redmond

Please include this coupon with payment. Please do not staple, paper clip or tape your payment.

Please select payment option

Full Payment (3% Discount)

Two-Thirds Payment (2% Discount)

Next Payment Due

One-Third Payment (No Discount)

Next Payment Due

Payment Due November 15, 2022

TAX ACCOUNT: 246088

(Mailing address change form on reverse)

Please make checks payable to Deschutes County Tax Collector

AerialMap

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

AssessorMap

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

FloodMap

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

AerialMap

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

ZoningMap

ParcelID:246088

TaxAccount#:151309DA01401

450NWGreenwoodAve, RedmondOR97756

Thismap/plat isbeingfurnishedasanaidinlocatingtheherein describedlandinrelationtoadjoiningstreets,natural boundariesandotherland,andisnot asurveyoftheland depicted Except totheextent apolicyoftitleinsuranceis expresslymodifiedbyendorsement,ifany,thecompanydoes not insuredimensions,distances,locationofeasements, acreageorothermattersshownthereon

CHAPTER 8

Site Details Map

City: Redmond County: Deschutes County

State: Oregon

ZIP Code: 97756

Census Tract: 41017000800

Census Block Group: 410170008003

CBSA: Bend, OR Metropolitan Statistical Area

This site is located in:

ACS Population Summary

ACS Population Summary

ACS Population Summary

WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS (WHO DID NOT WORK FROM HOME)

ACS Population Summary

CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE 18 OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS

CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE

HOUSEHOLDS BY POVERTY

ACS Population Summary

Data Note: N/A means not available Population by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household income represents income in 2021, adjusted for inflation

2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules

Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120.

Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage

High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable.

Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution.

Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey

Reliability: high medium low

ACS Population Summary

ACS Population Summary

HOUSEHOLD TYPE BY RELATIVES AND NONRELATIVES FOR POPULATION

ACS Population Summary

CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE 18 OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS

CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE

ACS Population Summary

Data Note: N/A means not available Population by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household income represents income in 2021, adjusted for inflation

2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules

Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120.

Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage

High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable.

Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution.

Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey

Reliability: high medium low

ACS Population Summary

ACS Population Summary

ACS Population Summary

CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE 18 OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS

CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE

ACS Population Summary

Data Note: N/A means not available Population by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household income represents income in 2021, adjusted for inflation

2017-2021 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esri is releasing the 2017-2021 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys including fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules

Margin of error (MOE): The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence. The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120.

Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage

High Reliability: Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable.

Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yellow-use with caution.

Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate. The estimate is considered very unreliable.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey

Reliability: high medium low

Market Profile

Data Note: Household population includes persons not residing in group quarters. Average Household Size is the household population divided by total households. Persons in families include the householder and persons related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. Per Capita Income represents the income received by all persons aged 15 years and over divided by the total population

U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography.

Market Profile

Data Note: Income represents the preceding year, expressed in current dollars. Household income includes wage and salary earnings, interest dividends, net rents, pensions, SSI and welfare payments, child support, and alimony.

Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028 U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography.

Market Profile

Market Profile

Data Note: Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race The Diversity Index measures the probability that two people from the same area will be from different race/ ethnic groups

data converted by Esri into 2020 geography.

Market Profile

Market Profile

Data Note: Households with children include any households with people under age 18, related or not. Multigenerational households are families with 3 or more parentchild relationships. Unmarried partner households are usually classified as nonfamily households unless there is another member of the household related to the householder. Multigenerational and unmarried partner households are reported only to the tract level. Esri estimated block group data, which is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography.

2028 U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography.

25, 2023

Market Profile

Data Note: Consumer spending shows the amount spent on a variety of goods and services by households that reside in the area Expenditures are shown by broad budget categories that are not mutually exclusive. Consumer spending does not equal business revenue. Total and Average Amount Spent Per Household represent annual figures The Spending Potential Index represents the amount spent in the area relative to a national average of 100

Source: Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2019 and 2020 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Esri. Source: Esri forecasts for 2023 and 2028 U.S. Census Bureau 2000 and 2010 decennial Census data converted by Esri into 2020 geography. August 25, 2023

COMMERCIAL USE AND INDUSTRIAL USE ZONES

8.0150Strip-Service Commercial C-1 Zone.

8.0155Central Business District Commercial (CBD) C-2 Zone.

8.0160Special-Service Commercial C-3 Zone.

8.0165Limited Service Commercial C-4Zone.

8.0166Limited Service Commercial C-4A Zone: Except as provided in 8.0190 and 8.0195, the standards and criteria for development in the C-4A Zone shall apply to development in the C-4A Zone.

8.0170Tourist Commercial C-5 Zone.

8.0175Downtown Overlay District. In the DowntownOverlay District, the following regulations shall apply:

1. Purpose. The purposeof the Downtown Overlay District is to promote and sustain:

A. Economic Growth - Assure opportunities for a stable, vital, diverse, and competitive economy in the heart of the city.

B. Vibrant Downtown - Strengthen downtown as avibrant, mixed-use district that draws a wide spectrum of residents and visitors.

C. Downtown Appearance - Improve and enhancethe appearance of the built environment and natural features throughout downtown, especially along primary commercial corridors, and other major arterials.

D. Historic Character - Preserve and retain historic structures and cultural resourcesthroughout downtown.

E. Pedestrian Environment - Improve and enhance the pedestrian environment throughout downtown, as well as the pedestrianconnections to surrounding neighborhoods and civic resources.

2. Intent. The intent of the Downtown Overlay District is to:

A. Encourage avibrant mix of pedestrian-oriented uses, including residential, shopping and entertainment uses;

B. Increase the density and intensity of development;

C. Establish height, bulk, and lot coverage regulations that balance existing urban fabric with a desired character for downtown;

D. Promote active ground floors by regulating the quantity and location of doors and windows;

E. Establish standards for setbacks and landscaping that encourage and promote a strong pedestrian environment.

F. Establish parking and access standards that support pedestrian activity.

3. Uses Permitted (Please see 8.0190 TableC)

4. Development Standards. In the Downtown Overlay District, the following dimensional standards shall apply:

A. Minimum Building Setback: Two (2) feet. Surface treatment needs to be of similar nature as adjoining sidewalk.

B. Maximum Building Setback: Ten (10) feet. Surface treatment beyond two feet from the sidewalk needs to be landscaped or treated with decorative pavers. Asphalt is prohibited. For full-block developments, a minimum of 50% of the primary street-facing building façade must be located at the minimum two (2) feet setback as described in4.A.

C. Minimum LandscapedArea: No minimum landscaping requirement.

D. Ground Floor Windows: Ground floor windows must be at least 50% of the building length and 50%of the street-facing façade to a minimum height of -

above finished right-of-way. If the site has two or more frontages, the Ground Floor Window standards is only required on the primary façade. The other façade has a minimum requirement of 50% of the building length and 25% of the ground floor wall area. Windows arerequired tobe transparent.

Please note: Ground floor wall area is defined as all wallareas up to ten (10) feet above the finished grade.

Ground Floor Windows Residential Use: 25% of the ground floor wall area must be transparent.

E. Main Entrance: The front door to all buildings must be oriented to the primary street. In the event that a building is located on the corner, the front door should be oriented directly to the corner or located within fifty (50) feet of the corner of the primary street.

F. Pedestrian Connection from Front Door to theStreet: Create a straight-line connection from the front door tothe primary street sidewalks.

G. Exterior Display and Storage: Permanent storage between the building and the street is prohibited.

H. Screening HVAC Equipment: Screen rooftop mechanical equipment through extended parapets or other roof forms that are integrated into the overall composition of the building. Screen ground floormechanical equipment. Renewable energy generation devicesmay be exempt from screening, subject to site and design review by a hearings body.

I. Parking andAccess: Parking between the building and the primary street is prohibited.

5. Building Height. The intent of the building height standards is to set guidelines to assist the development in the downtowncore that increase economic activity, capital value and encourage investment in the downtown core. The following guidelines provide performance standards that encourage innovative design and development techniques within specific parameters. They are generally prioritized to include the following: Compatibility withexisting downtownbuildings andsurrounding residential neighborhoods; Human scale related to building design, including height and massing, and its impact on solar access and views; Multi-story and mixed-use buildings for increased density and diversified use on premium land intheurban core; Development incentives for increased height, based on Performance Bonuses.

A. Maximum Height: Themaximum height allowed for the downtown overlay district for all structures that are not within one full city block of aresidential zone and west of SW 5th Street is sixty (60) feet, and east of SW 5th Street is 75 feet. The maximum height of structures east of 5th Street may be increased if a Conditional Use Permit for the structure is approved by a Hearings Body. The following standards shall apply to structures inthe Downtown OverlayDistrict.

1. Street Wall Height: Maximum street wall façade height for the downtown overlay district for all structures that are not within one full city block of aresidential zone is forty-five (45) feet.

2. Upper-floor Setback: Buildings taller than forty-five (45) feet must step back upper stories by at least 10 feet measured from the façade of the street wallfacing the street, public park, or open space.

3. Residential Buffer Zone: All buildings in the Downtown Overlay District within one full city blockadjacent to a residential zone shall be considered to be part of the Residential Buffer Zone, wherein the following height

standards apply:

a. Maximum Height: The maximum height allowed for all structures within the Residential Zone Buffer is fifty (50) feet.

b. Street Wall Height: Maximum street wall façade height for structures withinthe Residential Zone Buffer is thirty-five (35) feet.

c. Upper Floor Setback Requirements: Buildings taller than thirtyfive (35) feet must step back upper stories by at least 10 feet measured from the façade of the street wall facing the street, alleyway, public park, or open space.

B. Architectural Standards for Buildings Taller Than 45 Feet: In addition to the existing Site and Design Review criteria and Downtown Overlay District Design Standards, the following architectural standards will apply to all buildings taller than forty-five(45) feet.

1. On upper floors use windows and/or architectural features that provide interest on all four sides of the building when permitted within the building code.

2. Abrupt changes in building heights and/or roof orientation should be diminished by offsets of building form and mass.

3. Use recesses and projections to visually divide building surfaces into smaller scaleelements.

4. Use color tovisually reduce the size, bulk, and scale of the building.

5. Buildings sixty feet or over shall provide rooflines with articulated features.

6. Location of back flow prevention devices and the fire sprinkler riser must be identified on project plans submitted for site and design review and shall be located inside the building.

C. Buildings within the Downtown Overlay District shall only be permitted to exceed 75 feet if they comply with the standards set forthbelow.

1. Performance Bonus: Additional building height above 75 feet may be approved if the project achieves a minimum of twelve (12) points from the following:

Affordable Housing: The project provides affordable housing, per City standards, for low- and moderate-income households, as a percentage of the total number of residential units built. 3points for 10%, 4 points for 15%, and 5 points for 20% of total number of residential units built for affordable housing.

Workforce Housing: The project provides workforce housing, per City standards. 1 point for 10%, and 2points for 20% of total number of residential uses built for workforce housing.

Public Plaza: The project incorporates a public plaza which is at least 5% of the gross site area. Theplaza shall be on the street side of the building, and open and free to the public at alltimes and shallremain for a period of at least ten years. 1 point per 5% public plaza space, with a maximum of 4points.

Public Art: 0.5% of the overall project budget is set aside for an on-site public art project that shallremain for the life of the building, or 1.0% of the overall project budget is provided to the City for off-site public art shall be awarded 2 points. Increasing thesepercentages to 0.75 % and 1.5% respectively increases the number of points awarded to 3. Increasing these percentages to

3 - 5 pts.

1 2 pts.

1 - 4 pts.

2 - 4 pts.

1.0% and 2.0 % respectively increases the points awarded to 4.

View Access and Preservation: The project provides a public viewing deck or decks, or similar features, whichare at least 5% of the gross site area. The viewing deck(s) should be located at least sixty (60) feet above ground level and provide significant free public access to views of surrounding Central Oregon features, such as the Cascade Mountains and Smith Rocks, and shall remainfor a period of at least ten years.

Economic Vitality: The project provides additional economic benefit tothe City by providing retail sales and/or hospitality uses on multiple levels. Total floor area dedicated to entertainment, eating anddrinking, retail services, and service commercial uses as presented in Section 8.0190, Table C of the Redmond Development Code, must equal or exceed 75% of the building footprint and shall remain for a period of 5 years will be awarded 4 points. One additional point will be awarded for each additional 25% of floor area (as defined by the building footprint) for retail, entertainment or hospitality uses up to amaximum of 8 points.

Historic Preservation: The project provides for preservation or adaptive reuse of all buildings on the Cit tory of Historic Resources located on the project site in amanner consistent with the Secretary of the Interio rds for the Treatment of Historic Resources shallbeawarded 2 points. The Hearings Body may increase the points up to 4 points for projects on the National Register of Historic Places. As an alternative, 1.0% of the overall project budget is provided for a specific historic preservation project that will be completed within a specific timeframe in the Cityof Redmond or is provided to the Redmond Historic Commission for historic Redmond projects (not operations) shallbe awarded 2 points. The provision of 2% of the overall project budget will receive 4 points.

Sustainable Building: Project is built to LEED standards, or equivalent green building practices. It will be up tothe applicant toprovide material supporting equivalent building practices. (Certified is awarded 2 points, Silver certification is awarded 3 points, Gold certification is awarded 4 Points, and Platinum is awarded 5 points.)

Parking: In addition to the required parking for the development, the project provides at least 7 on-site parking spaces for public use between 8:00 6:00 PM that shall remain for the life ofthe building. 1 point per 7 public parking spaces, with amaximum of 5 points.

1 pt.

4 - 8 pts.

2 - 4 pts.

2 - 5 pts.

1 - 5 pts.

Total: 36 pts.

2. Building Bulk for Buildings over 60 feet in Height:

a. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Buildings between sixty (60) feet and eighty-five (85) feet shall have a maximum floor area ratio of 4.0. Buildings eighty-five (85) feet and taller shall have a maximum floor area ratio of 5.0. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is a method of

calculating allowable floor area in a development as a means of con an massing of larger developments, often encouraging setbacks and step backs, and progressively slender upper floors.

3. Application Requirements for Buildings Over 75 Feet: Planning applications submitted for new buildings over 75 feet tall shall include the following additional items to assist the City in the analysis and decisionmaking process.

a. Three-Dimensional Digital Model: A complete threedimensional digital model of the proposed building.

b. Solid WasteManagement Plan: A solid wastemanagement plan to showhow the project meets or exceed Solid Waste Guidelines, to the approval of the Utilities Director.

c. Utilities InfrastructureAnalysis: on of existing utilities infrastructure and recommendations to ensurethat the project will have adequate water pressure for domestic use and fire flows andthat the collection system inthe area surrounding the proje impact.

d. Emergency Services Access Plan: A written and graphic plan, created in consultation wit eMarshal to showhow access to site and upper floors for emergency response personnel will be provided.

e. Public Safety Plan: A security plan, created in consultation with the Police Department for all proposed buildings that include publicly accessible areas such as parking garages, courtyards, public stairways, elevators, and decks.

4. Height Design Departure: In addition to the availability of variances as noted in 8.0700 8.0720, a design departure procedure will be established to allow a project to achieve flexibility in the application of prescriptive development standards and height performance bonuses (limited to two height performance bonuses). A 20% departure may be granted administratively. In order to allow a departure from a code standard, an applicant must demonstrate that it would result in a development that better meets the intent of the purpose of the regulation and applicable design guidelines.

6. Design Standards. Any change to the exterior of a building or a property shallbe reviewed by the Community Development Department pursuant to Article IV Section 8.3040 of the Redmond Development Code.

7. Off-Street Parking. In addition to the standards of 8.0505 8.0515, the following standards shall apply for off-street parking in theDowntown Overlay District:

A. Off-Street Parking Requirements(Number ofSpaces):

1. Residential: Per State Condominium Code

2. Non-Residential: 1 parking space per 500 net square feet

3. For buildings over 75 feet in height: 1 parking space per 1000 net square feet.

B. Fee-In-Lieu of Parking: The purpose of these provisions is to allow development in the Downtown Overlay District to reduce the number of off-street parking spaces through payment of a fee in order to meet the parking requirements set forth in this Code. These provisions may be utilized for parking required for new construction or for an increase in required parking resulting from the change of use of an existing building.

Payment made to the City in-lieu of supplying the required off-street parking spaces for a project in the Downtown Overlay District may be provided as follows:

1. By the one-time payment of a non-refundable parking and mobility improvement fee to the ee Schedule, paid prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Fees collected shall be used to fund parking, street improvements or facilities to improve mobility or enhance pedestrian connectivity and safety in the Downtown Overlay District.

2. From time to time the City shall establish the value of off-street parking facilities on a per parking space basis, used to establish the above parking and mobility improvement fee.

3. The City Engineering shall evaluate development proposals requesting to pay an in-lieu fee through conducting a Transportation System Analysis or parking study.

4. Any such request for parking in-lieu may be denied or reduced by the Community Development Director, or designee. The Director, or designee, shall determine:

a. Whether there is sufficient alternative parking within a two to fourblock radius of the project location.

b. Whether approval of the request would have an adverse effect on surrounding neighborhoods.

c. Whether the request meets the Purpose and Intent of the Downtown Overlay District Zone.

d. Compliance with the Redmond Comprehensive Plan 2040 and support plans, as amended.

[Section 8.0175 amended by Ord. #2016-17 passed January 31, 2017]

[Section 8.0175 amended by Ord. #2022-04 passed June 28, 2022]

[Section 8.0175 amended by Ord. #2022-09 passed December 13, 2022]

8.0180Light Industrial (M-1) Zone.

8.0182General Industrial (M-1.5) Zone.

8.0185Heavy Industrial (M-2) Zone.

8.0186Large Lot Industrial (LLI) Zone.

1. LLI Zone Regulations. The following standards and regulations apply inthe LLI Zone:

A. The lot shall adhere to the designation as acknowledged by the Central Oregon IntergovernmentalCouncil.

B. No property that is zoned LLI can be rezoned to another zone within ten years of the LLI designation.

C. The minimum lot size is 50 acres. Division or separation of lots or parcels within the site to new lots or parcels less than the minimum lot size is not allowed until the site is developed with a primarytraded sector use requiring a large lot.

D. Allowed uses are tradedsector uses as provided in Section 2.

E. Uses allowed tosupport a primary userincluded:

1. Subordinate industrial uses that rely upon and support the primary traded sector use;

2. Service commercial uses that support the traded sector uses if they are limited to7500 square feet per use; and

3. Retail uses accessory to a traded sector use and limited to 7500 square feet.

F. Conceptual Phased Site Development Plan. A Conceptual Phased Site Development Plan is required for each primary traded-sector use as part of the Site and Design Review process in addition to the criteria and requirements outlined in Article IV of this code. In addition to the requirements outlined in Section 8.3025, the following elements shall be considered as part of the Conceptual Phased SiteDevelopment Plan:

1. Open Space. Generally identify land provided for openspace onthe site.

2. Connectivity and Trail Networks. A conceptual transportation plan for streets, pedestrians connectivity and trail networks. E.g., Connection of bicycle routes and pedestrian network for utility and recreational purposes.

3. Site Design. Describe how the design elements (i.e., streets, open spaces, signage, and architecture) are integrated and coordinated throughout the site.

4. Analysis of Anticipated Utility Consumption by Phase. Analysis of the anticipated utility consumption by phase for wastewater, water, power, natural gas, and other utility infrastructure necessary to support the development.

2. LLI Zone Uses Permitted. The following uses are allowed outright or conditionally in the Large Lot Industrial Zone:

O PerORS285B.280,tradedsectormeansindustriesinwhich memberfirmsselltheirgoodsorservicesintomarketsforwhich nationalorinternationalcompetitionexists,aswellasusesand servicesthatdirectlybenefittradedsectoruses.Alloweduses includemanufacturing,processingplants,distributioncenter, warehousing,researchanddevelopment,andhighereducation institutions

O

C

Afteraprimarytraded-sectorusehasbeensited,subordinate industrialusesareallowed.Subordinatemeansindustriesthat relyuponandsupportaprimarytradedsectoruse

Afteraprimarytraded-sectorusehasbeensited,service commercialusesareallowedthatsupportthetradedsectoruses andshallbelimitedto7500squarefeetperstructure

C Afteraprimarytraded-sectorusehasbeensited,retailuses,and eatinganddrinkingestablishmentsareallowedasaconditional useandshallbelimitedto7500squarefeetperuseinthe structure.

O=Outrightuses,C=ConditionalUses

3. Minimum Standards. See Table D, 8.0195.

[Section 8.0186 added by Ord. #2015-11 passedSeptember 22, 2015]

[Section 8.0186 amended by Ord. #2022-09 passed December 13, 2022]

CHAPTER 8 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

8.0190Table C, Uses Permitted. The following uses identified below are allowed outright or conditionally in each of the Commercial and Industrial zones. Outright or conditional uses in the M-1.5 zone may be permitted Conditionally in the M-1 or M-2 zones; this allowance does not apply for uses Not Allowed ( N ).

CHAPTER 8 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

O*Maximumsize=10,000squarefeet

O**Maximumsize=20,000squarefeet

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2012-10 passed August 14, 2012]

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2015-04 passed May 19, 2015]

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2016-17 passed January 31, 2017]

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2017-12 passed December 12, 2017]

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2018-09 passed September 11, 2018]

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2020-15 passed November 10, 2020]

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2022-04 passed June 28, 2022]

[Section 8.0190 amended by Ord. #2022-09 passed December 13, 2022]

CHAPTER 8 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

8.0195Table D, Minimum Standards. The following minimum standards are required in each of the Commercialand Industrial zones as follows (all distances aremeasured in feet):

*Theminimumlotsizeshallbedeterminedbasedondemonstrationoftheabilitytodevelopthesiteinaccordancewiththezonestandards,offstreetparkingstandards,Site&DesignReviewStandards,landscapingrequirementsandotherapplicableDevelopmentCodeprovisionswithout adverseimpacttowaterandlandresourcequalityandadjoiningproperties.

*ResidentialusespermittedinCommercialzonesshallbesubjecttothedensitystandardsfortheR-5zone,exceptfortheC-2,C-3zoneand DowntownOverlayDistrict,forwhichthereisnomaximumdensitystandard.

A Arearyardabuttinganalleyshallbe25feetfromthepropertylinetofoundationwhenthealleyisusedtoservicethecommercialestablishment and10feetinothercases.

B Maximumbuildingheightislimitedto45feetforallstructureswithinonefullcityblockofaresidentialzone.Whereallowedbuildingsover45feet shallconformtheUpperFloorSetbackStandardsintheDowntownOverlayZoneSiteandDesignStandardsinSection8.0175(5).

C RearyardsalongthenorthsideofHighlandAvenue/Highway126betweenSW23rdandSW27thStreetsshallhaveaminimumarterialsetback of25feet.Allotherrearsetbacksadjacenttoarterialsshallbe50feet.

D TheminimumsetbackbetweenastructureandanexistinguseintheC-5zoneshallbe5feetfromthepropertylineand10feetfromany adjacentstructureonthesubjectsiteoradjacentproperty.

CHAPTER 8 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

E Nouselocatedinanindustrialzoneadjacenttooracrossthestreetfromaresidentialzoneshallexceed60%ofthelotareaincludingbuildings, storageorfacilities,andoff-streetparkingandloading.Mostofthelandscapingrequiredonindustriallotsthatabutresidentialzonesispermittedin betweentheindustrialuse/residentialuses.

F Theminimumsideyardinanindustrialzoneshallbe10feetfor1and2storybuildingsand15feetfor3storybuildings.

G Maximumbuildingheightislimitedto50feetforallstructureswithinonefullcityblockofaresidentialzone.Whereallowed,buildingsover50 feetshallconformtheDowntownOverlayDistrictSiteandDesignStandardsinSection8.0175(5).Themaximumbuildingheightforstructures westofSW5th Streetis60feet.Themaximumbuildingheightforstructureseastof5th Streetis75feetandmaybeincreasedabove75feetifa ConditionalUsePermitforthestructureisapprovedbyaHearingsandReviewAuthority.

H Existingzero-lotlinestructuresasofAugust12,2008,shallbeexemptfromthisstandard.Atthetimethefrontfaçadeofabuildingorabuilding isdemolishedasdefinedbythisCode,thenthebuildingshallcomplywiththisstandardunlessavarianceisapproved.

I Fullblockdevelopmentsrequireaminimumof50percentofthebuildingfaçadetobedevelopedtotheminimumsetback.Asphaltisprohibitedin thefrontyardsetback(concrete,pavers,landscapingareallowed).

J Maybemetthroughwalkways,playareas,plazas,pocketparks,andpicnicareas.

[Section 8.0195 amended by Ord. #2012-10 passed August 14, 2012]

[Section 8.0195 amended by Ord. #2014-12 passed May 27, 2014]

[Section 8.0195 amended by Ord. #2015-11 passed September 22, 2015]

[Section 8.0195 amended by Ord. #2018-09 passed September 11, 2018]

[Section 8.0195 amended by Ord. #2020-15 passed November 10, 2020]

[Section 8.0195 amended by Ord. #2022-04 passed June 28, 2022]