Building Social Cohesion

BUILDING SOCIAL COHESION SUPPORTED BY:

The Inclusive Society Institute expresses its appreciation to the In Transformation Initiative, who’s contribution has enabled the implementation of the roundtable dialogues reported on in this publication.

BUILDING SOCIAL COHESION

In support of efforts to promote social cohesion in South Africa, the Inclusive Society Institute hosted a series of roundtable dialogues to reinforce nation-building and reconciliation in the country. It forms part of the institute’s broader efforts aimed at promoting a cohesive inclusive society. The roundtable dialogues covered in this report relate to the institute’s engagement with the Afrikaans-speaking community. The ongoing broader programme will also engage the other minority communities of the country, and it will facilitate inter-community dialogue aimed at building a common South African identity.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

1

Copyright Š 2020 Inclusive Society Institute 132 Adderley Street Cape Town, 8000 South Africa

NPO Registration: 235-515

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Inclusive Society Institute

DISCLAIMER Views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the Inclusive Society Institute or those of their respective Board or Council members.

All records and findings included in this roundtable report, stem from the discussions that took place during the social cohesion roundtable dialogues on the role and place of the Afrikaans-speaking community, which were held in Cape Town on the 11th of February 2020 and Pretoria on the 18th of February 2020.

2

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

CONTENT Setting the scene for the roundtable on the role and place of the Afrikaans-speaking community in South African society | Keith Khoza | Board Member of the Inclusive Society Institute

4

Purpose and objectives | Daryl Swanepoel | Chief Executive Officer of the Inclusive Society Institute

6

Executive Summary | Roelf Meyer | Director, In Transformation Initiative

8

Social Cohesion survey

10

Recommendations

14

A message to the Afrikaans Community | Paul Mashatile | Treasurer General of the

African National Congress

18

Protecting the identity of the Coloured Community in South Africa | Dr Ruben Richards | Chairperson

of the Ruben Richards Foundation

20

Inclusive economic growth key to social cohesion | Theo Vorster | Chief Executive Officer of

Galileo Capital

22

Summary of the open discussion: Working together to build on nation

24

Annexure A: Tabulated list of concerns

30

Annexure B: Action plan

32

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

3

KEITH KHOZA | BOARD MEMBER OF THE INCLUSIVE SOCIETY INSTITUTE

SETTING THE SCENE FOR THE DIALOGUE WITH THE AFRIKAANS-SPEAKING COMMUNITY

4

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

M

r Keith Khoza, a member of the Inclusive Society Institute’s Board, in his welcome remarks at the

Pretoria dialogue, set the scene for the evening’s discussion.

He said that 1994 was a watershed year in this country, where we embarked on a journey to redefine ourselves as a people, as a nation, and as a new democra-

As an institute we are very aware of

This platform that the Inclusive Society

cy. It came with all sorts of challenges,

the many challenges that the nation is

Institute is creating, we trust, will

problems, and learning to co-exist and

facing, including the important issue of

make a meaningful contribution to reig-

to embrace each other. Twenty-five

social cohesion. That is why we believe

niting our nation’s dream of an inclusive

years later, we are still walking that

these conversations to be crucial.

society that works for all who live in it,

journey. We have not yet achieved all the

At times, they may not be comforta-

black and white.

milestones we have set ourselves – to

ble conversations to have, they are

be a vibrant nation and a formidable

complex issues that need interrogation,

Likewise, Ms Sue van der Merwe, the

force in the rest of Africa. Clearly then,

analysis, understanding and compro-

institute’s Chairperson, introduced

we have a huge task ahead of us and

mise – not always easy content to deal

the proceedings at the Cape Town

that is why conversations such as these

with. But we have to do it.

dialogue.

being organised by the Inclusive Society Institute are so important.

As a diverse nation we need to continuously reach out in an effort to find each other and understand where we come from, where we are going, and to agree amongst ourselves what the legacy is that we wish to bequeath the generations to follow. We want a South Africa that can be proud of itself.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

5

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES DARYL SWANEPOEL | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE INCLUSIVE SOCIETY INSTITUTE

6

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

T

he Inclusive Society Institute has identified social cohesion as a theme that needs critical attention in our country. It

recognises that nation-building and reconciliation are vital components that are required to build a cohesive nation capable of providing growth and stability for society as a whole. The institute is concerned with a sense of dissipa-

negative narrative promoting racial in-

pursuit of nation-building, reconciliation

tion of South Africa being the rainbow

tolerance and suggestions of alienation

and the harnessing of all the country’s

nation. It shares the view of the African

amongst certain sectors of the com-

talents in pursuit of a common future

National Congress (as expressed in the

munity. It believes that the tendency by

that benefits society as a unit.

2020 January the 8th Statement and by

some to stereotype communities based

President Ramaphosa in his 2020 State

on the actions of certain individuals

This phase of the social cohesion pro-

of the Nation Address) that this national

is harming the national project which

gramme entails a series of roundtable

question deserves the urgent attention

requires all groups in society to work

discussions with the various minority

of South Africa’s policymakers.

together as co-builders of the country.

communities in the country. It is important for policymakers to understand

With this in mind, the institute has

This dialogue on the role and place of the

the psyche of these communities. The

embarked on an extensive programme to

Afrikaans-speaking community, forms

institute is, however, of the opinion

analyse the current state of demograph-

part of the institute’s broader social

that just as important an issue is the

ic cohesion in the country. It intends to

cohesion programme. It seeks to test

breaking down of the silo-effect and

develop a set of proposals that could

the attitudes and perceptions of this

that much more effort is required around

help guide public policymakers in their

particular community as to their commit-

inter-community interaction aimed at

promotion of a common South African-

ment and sense of belonging. It also aims

promoting a better understanding of our

ism that works for the nation as whole.

to direct policymakers to the issues in

fellow South Africans. To this end, the

society that drive a wedge between com-

next phase of the programme will focus

munities, and which need attention in

on these aspects.

The institute is concerned with the

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

7

ROELF MEYER | DIRECTOR, IN TRANSFORMATION INITIATIVE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

T

he Inclusive Society Institute

its place and role within the country, as

held two roundtable discus-

well as their experiences in the promo-

sions on the role of the Afri-

tion of social cohesion and national unity.

kaans-speaking community in

linguistic, racial and cultural histories.

Overall, participants expressed their commitment and hope that the issues

South Africa. The first was held on the

Additionally, the engagements also

plaguing South Africa can be resolved,

11th of February 2020 in Cape Town and

served as an opportunity to bring the

despite echoes of frustration and

the second on the 18th of February 2020

concerns of citizens to the attention of

scepticism regarding the political will

in Pretoria. Invited guests ranged from

national leadership and policymakers,

from national leadership to consider the

academics to community activists, pri-

and develop policy recommendations

concerns and issues expressed.

vate sector business leaders, members

that will allow the Afrikaans-speaking

of the clergy, entrepreneurs, economists,

community to fully contribute to the

All participants agreed that there is

members of the judiciary, government

development of an inclusive society and

a need for pragmatic solutions in the

representatives, members of the media

economy in South Africa.

country which can be achieved through

and film sector, civil society organisation representatives and educators.

collaborative efforts by government, The roundtable discussions revealed ar-

the private sector and civil society. The

eas of alignment, disagreement and lack

Afrikaans-speaking community expressed

The aim of the discussions was to

of clarity pertaining to the definition of a

a keen desire to be involved in these

achieve a better understanding of how

South African’s national identity and how

processes and believe they can also be

the Afrikaans-speaking community views

this is informed by the individual’s ethnic,

providers of critical solutions to issues of

8

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

KEY TAKEOUTS • The Inclusive Society Institute held two roundtable discussions on the role of the Afrikaans-speaking community in South Africa.

• Keynote speakers for the events were Ruben Richards of the Ruben Richards Foundation (Cape Town) and Theo Vorster, an economic commentator and CEO of Galileo Capital (Pretoria).

• The primary focus of the Inclusive Society Institute is to promote a more inclusive society by creating a platform where discourse around often divisive topics can be conducted through engaging with diverse and representative groups.

• The majority of participants continue to feel a sense of hope and optimism for the future of the country, despite many frustrations and challenges.

• Several participants reiterated that the Afrikaans-speaking community is not one of homogeneity nor one without its contradictions and complexities and should, therefore, also not

•

• •

•

be approached with the stereotypes that have been historically associated with this community.

It is important that minorities are included in these types of discussions towards contributing to the narrative regarding national unity, national policy and the effectiveness and implementation of principles set out in the constitution.

The current state of the economy is adversely affecting social cohesion and inclusive growth in South Africa.

The Inclusive Society Institute is committed to conducting future dialogue discussions of this nature, towards engaging with more participants in a structured manner and influencing different role players in the country.

The Institute can provide valuable insights into areas of alignment or division through facilitating robust discussions and providing analysis and research into public policies and issues of national interest.

unemployment, service delivery, training

Afrikaans-speaking community is not

intervention and guidance from leadership

and skills transfer and economic growth.

one of homogeneity, nor one without its

will be necessary for any improvement in

contradictions and complexities

the current economic growth trajectory.

However, most participants had the per-

and should, therefore, also not be

The adverse effect of BBBEE and affirma-

ception that there was a lack of political

approached with the stereotypes that

tive action was also emphasised by many

will to implement recommendations

have historically been associated with

of the participants. Some argued that

and to address the issues expressed

this community.

the legislation surrounding these policies

through dialogue initiatives. This per-

does not benefit the intended recipients

ception, be it real or not, continues to

Additional key issues that were ex-

and contributes to a lack of business

deepen the apathy among citizens. Con-

pressed during both discussion sessions

growth, as well as the loss of critical

sequently, this makes the mobilisation

included the lack of clear and consistent

skills from the country.

and motivation of citizens to contribute

leadership required to inspire citizens

to the development of the country, that

to reclaim their agency in contributing

Additionally, clarification is required

much more difficult.

to national unity, nation building and

around some of the key issues such

social cohesion. The continued discrim-

as the definition of the South African

It was generally expressed that members

ination against minority groups as a

identity, the narrative of national unity,

of the Afrikaans-speaking community,

result of divisive political messaging and

property rights, land redistribution and

including both White and Coloured people,

exclusionary national polices was also a

the current status of constitutional

need to be involved and give their input

cause for concern.

principles, among others. Guidance

in shaping the narrative around social co-

from national leadership on these

hesion, legislation, political participation

Moreover, there are high levels of concern

issues is needed in order to remove

and economic empowerment.

regarding the current economic cli-

uncertainty and provide a degree of

mate. Given the uncertainty created by

clarity to industry stakeholders,

prolonged economic stagnation, urgent

investors and society in general.

Several participants reiterated that the

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

9

SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY T

he composition of the two

a questionnaire was developed which

roundtables covered in this

probed the attitudes of the attendees

report, the institute consid-

on a range of issues that would allow

The twelve questions posed,

ers generally representative

for a broad assessment of this

could be divided into three broad

of the broader Afrikaans-speaking

specific community’s commitment

themes:

community in South Africa. The

to the new democratic dispensation

roundtables served as focus groups to

in South Africa, the issues in society

Theme one tested their willingness

test their attitudinal sentiments as it

that they find most concerning and

to be co-builders of South Africa and

relates to their role and place in soci-

the prospect of their social integration

their acceptance of the

ety. To further assist in the analysis,

into an inclusive society, free from

rainbow nation’ concept.

10

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

discrimination and racial division.

Interpretation The overall conclusion to be drawn from the responses to the questions posed under theme one is that there is a high • Do you believe that, as a mem-

• Do you believe that Afrikaans

ber of the Afrikaans community,

people and/or their culture are

you can make a meaningful

being discriminated against?

contribution to build and sustain an inclusive society in South Africa?

• Do you identify with the follow-

• Do you think the Afrikaans language is being marginalised?

• Do you believe that the new (younger) generation

ing statement? A modern-day

of Afrikaans people are still

Afrikaans citizen is one that

being held accountable for the

is in touch with the times,

actions and decisions of the

identifies as African, and expe-

previous regime?

riences/accepts other cultures

• Do you experience a sense of

without fear of having to give

solidarity between the various

up his/her own cultural identity.

racial groups in the country?

commitment across both groups to the building of a sustainable and inclusive South Africa. Ninety-six percent of the respondents in Cape Town and 100% of the respondents in Pretoria (98% average) believe they can make a positive contribution to the building of a shared future in South Africa. An average of 86% of the respondents across both groups identify themselves as [South] African and accept the other cultures of the country, without the fear of having to give up their own culture. At 95% this sentiment was especially high in the Pretoria group, but at 74% somewhat lower, yet still high, in the Cape Town

The second theme tested whether

The third theme served to test the

they felt a sense of belonging in the

community’s confidence in South

country, and gave insight into whether

Africa, and thus the likeliness of them

they believed their rights as an Afri-

committing themselves and their

kaans-speaking community were being

families to the long-term future of the

upheld. This test gave an indication

country. It is also important for the

as to whether they considered them-

country to retain the skill sets

selves to be valued as equal citizens

contained within the Afrikaans com-

and whether they had confidence in the

munity. This theme also specifically

country’s capacity to move beyond race-

tested their susceptibility to emigration.

based policy dialogue.

tal rights are being recognised in South Africa?

• Do you feel excluded from political decisions and policymaking?

conclusion to be drawn is that given the right motivation and support, the Afrikaans-speaking community will respond enthusiastically to a call to build a united, non-racial, non-sexist South Africa.

However, despite the high levels of aspiration to be part of the solution, from the responses it is evident that the Afrikaans-speaking community do not share the belief that the policymakers in South

• Do you feel economically secure?

• Do you feel that your fundamen-

group. Given these statistics, the fair

• Do you have confidence in the future of the country?

• Do you feel safe in the country (physically)?

• Have you considered emigrating?

Africa share such sentiment. The trends in both Cape Town and Pretoria were similar in all the questions designed to elicit an understanding of their sense of inclusion. Fifty-nine percent of the respondents were of the opinion that their fundamental rights are not being recognised, 73% feel excluded from

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

11

political decisions and policymaking, and

There is a general lack of confidence in

anomaly, nevertheless, with an average

63% believe that Afrikaans people and/

their economic future. Only 41% of the

of 42% of respondents indicating that

or their culture are being discriminated

respondents in Cape Town and 35% of

they have considered emigration, given

against. In terms of their thinking that

the respondents in Pretoria feel econom-

the necessity to retain skills and capital

the Afrikaans language is being mar-

ically secure. Even more alarming was

in South Africa, this is an aspect that

ginalised, here too, both the Cape Town

their sense of not being physically safe

deserves further investigation.

and Pretoria groups recorded a high

in the country. In this regard, only 15%

level of discontent, albeit somewhat

of the respondents in Cape Town and

The correlation between the two

higher in Cape Town (Cape Town 78%,

24% of the respondents in Pretoria feel

concepts of still holding the younger

Pretoria 54%, Average 64%). In terms of

physically safe in South Africa.

generation accountable for the actions

their conviction that the new (younger)

and decisions of the previous regime and

generation of Afrikaans people are still

That being said, the aforementioned

their susceptibility to emigration has not

being held accountable for the actions

negativity was not reflected to the

been tested. In this regard a follow-up

and decisions of the previous regime,

same degree in their general sense

study will be undertaken to determine

a staggering 86% believe it to be the

of confidence in the country’s future,

whether there is such a link, and whether

case, although in this instance, at 91%,

although there was a considerable

the notion of emigration is confined to

it was the Pretoria group that felt more

differentiation to be made between

specific generational strata or not.

strongly so. In Cape Town it was 78% of

the Cape Town and Pretoria groups.

the respondents that felt so.

Sixty-eight percent of the respondents in the Pretoria group have confidence

To reach the goal of an inclusive society

The general sense of exclusion reflected

in the country’s future. The percentage

in the aforementioned statistics has

of Cape Town respondents that have

From the aforementioned analysis,

distinctly resulted in the conviction that

confidence in the country’s future was

it can be deduced that, in terms of

there is a lack of solidarity between the

significantly lower (44%). The average

creating an inclusive society, a signif-

various racial groups in the country. Only

between the two groups stood at 58%.

icant trust deficit exists between the

30% of respondents believe such solidari-

The same schizophrenia was detected

Afrikaans-speaking community and the

ty exists (Cape Town 22%, Pretoria 35%).

in the responses to whether they had

country’s policymakers. In itself, this

considered emigration. Whilst only 35%

should be a cause for concern in terms

Also on the negative side, both in terms

of the respondents in Pretoria consider

of the stated objective of promoting

of their current levels of confidence in

emigration as an option, this grew to

social cohesion. On the positive side,

the country, and in their own personal

52% of the respondents in Cape Town. It

however, the policymakers will find the

futures, the statistics are quite glaring.

is not clear what has given rise to this

Afrikaans-speaking community receptive to programmes designed to promote their inclusion and mainstreaming into the public policy processes and implementation programmes of the state, as well as into the broader society. In doing so, policymakers should design strategies that aim to remove the concerns that have been clearly identified in this research as inhibitors to integration.

12

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY The role and place of the Afrikaans community in South African society

QUESTIONNAIRE

YES CPT

YES PTA

YES TOTAL

96%

100%

98%

2. Do you feel that your fundamental rights are being recognised in South Africa?

59%

59%

59%

3. Do you feel economically secure?

41%

35%

38%

4. Do you have confidence in the future of the country?

44%

68%

58%

5. Do you feel excluded from political decisions and policymaking?

78%

70%

73%

6. Do you feel safe in the country (physically)?

15%

24%

20%

67%

59%

63%

8. Have you considered emigrating?

52%

35%

42%

9. Do you think the Afrikaans language is being marginalised?

78%

54%

64%

78%

91%

86%

22%

35%

30%

74%

95%

86%

1. Do you believe that, as a member of the Afrikaans community, you can make a meaningful contribution to build and sustain an inclusive society in South Africa?

7. Do you believe that Afrikaans people and/or their culture are being discriminated against?

10. Do you believe that the new (younger) generation of Afrikaans people are still being held accountable for the actions and decisions of the previous regime?

11. Do you experience a sense of solidarity between the various racial groups in the country?

12. Do you identify with the following statement?

A modern-day Afrikaans citizen is one that is in touch with the times, identifies as African, and experiences/accepts other cultures without fear of having to give up his/her own cultural identity.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

13

RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations have emerged from the roundtable dialogue sessions held in Cape Town and Pretoria.

1. Encourage participation and collaboration through future dialogue and community programmes The roll-out of community-focused engagement aimed at educating citizens on the principles of democracy and active citizen participation, will serve to empower members of society and shape the narrative regarding political participation and social cohesion. These programmes can also contribute to the development of innovative solutions for issues affecting communities and inform the younger generation’s understanding of national identity.

Committing to future dialogue between government leaders and citizens can help to promote national unity among South Africans feeling excluded from decision-making processes and consultations. Moreover, workshops aimed at finding practical solutions to issues and blockages can restore citizens’

agency and motivate them to be active participants in building South Africa.

Robust, honest engagements need to take place regarding what is required to move the country forward. People from all races, ethnicities and cultures must be considered contributors in finding solutions, regardless of their political affiliations.

Improved collaboration between government and the private sector is needed to combat unemployment and implement training and skills transfer programmes in accordance with the needs of the economy. Moreover, the absorption of university graduates into the workforce is something that needs to urgently be addressed.

2. Shape the narrative of non-racialism Government is encouraged to re-assess the use of language regarding racial differentiation such as ‘Blacks in general and Africans in particular’, in an effort to confront the exclusion and discrimination experienced by minority groups that fall outside of these parameters.

Moreover, strategic and deliberate decisions pertaining to the messaging on national policy and critical matters affecting society, must be taken to inspire and motivate citizens to take

14

|

action. This can also serve to combat the current disconnect experienced between leadership and communities that feel excluded from the agenda.

Lastly, public officials are urged to steer away from stereotyping and generalisations when making public pronouncements which include racial aspects, as this has a demoralising effect on minority groups, especially those that have come to the party in terms of taking action and providing support.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

3. Define the vision for South Africa and promote partnerships The leadership in South Africa need to define the future envisioned for South Africa. Clarity is required on the definition of the new South Africa and what leadership is going to do to achieve this image in the country. People need motivation from leadership.

Furthermore, improved collaboration between government and the private sector is vital to combat unemployment and implement training and skills transfer programmes in accordance with the needs of the economy.

4. Provide inspirational, transparent and accountable leadership Address the messages coming from government leaders that discredit constitutional values and re-establish the sense of discipline amongst leaders. South Africans, regardless of ethnicity or culture will support this when seen in practice.

Don’t use political power to oppress minorities or exclude certain races from the decision-making processes. Follow the

prescripts of the constitution of equality and fairness and justice for all people and give every race an opportunity to participate in all sectors of the country.

Government must hold those found to be involved in corruption to account. Visible consequences must be implemented for citizens to see that government is serious about condemning and combatting corruption.

5. Clarity and reflection on legislation Leadership is encouraged to reflect on the intended versus the applied impact of policies. In the case of BBBEE and affirmative action, government could consider reform regarding the implantation of these policies to avoid the current adverse effects experienced by workforces, industry and private sector business. It should be an enabler for business to grow, develop and benefit the intended benefices.

Drastic intervention is needed in the education sector.

Educators require support from government pertaining to a

lack of resources and well-trained educators. The suggestion is to address the shortage in teachers by re-opening education colleges and training colleges for teachers.

Moreover, citizens require clarity and certainty from government on areas such as property rights, land redistribution without compensation, the National Democratic Revolution (NDR), economic reforms, the protection of the Judiciary and the status of Constitution following the effects of State Capture.

6. Mentorship initiatives There remains a great sense of optimism and willingness among the Afrikaans-speaking community and business to work together, mobilise and collaborate with government.

Citizens are willing, able and skilled to participate in programmes that promote the transfer of skills and establishing mentoring programmes throughout various sectors and trades in the country.

It is recommended that leadership consider collaborating with private business stakeholders and skilled artisans in

establishing training and mentoring programmes that can offer young people, graduates and unskilled workers opportunities to learn from experienced professionals and receive the support needed for the development of scarce skills, business growth and entrepreneurial enterprises.

Additionally, leadership can also consider approaching inactive or retired professionals and experienced stakeholders as participants in these mentorship programmes, thus making use of this currently overlooked yet available group of citizens.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

15

PAUL MASHATILE | TREASURER GENERAL OF THE AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS

A MESSAGE TO THE AFRIKAANS COMMUNITY: SOUTH AFRICA IS YOUR HOMELAND TOO 16

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

T

he focus of this address was

In the article, Seme wrote: “The demon

to say: “It was a conference of races

on the ANC’s commitment to

of racialism, the aberrations of the

and of nations – many of whose ranks

an inclusive society and the

Xosa-Fingo feud, the animosity that ex-

had been devastated by the demon of

actions taken by the ANC to

ists between the Zulus and the Tongas,

inter-tribal strife and jealousy.”

promote social cohesion:

between the Basutos and every other native must be buried and forgotten; it

The Freedom Charter, which was

The release of Mr. Nelson Mandela on

has shed among us sufficient blood! We

adopted in Kliptown in 1956, reflects

the 11th of February 1990 was high-

are one people. These divisions, these

the views of South Africans from all

lighted as the day when South Africa

jealousies, are the cause of all our

corners of the country. Most profoundly,

was placed firmly on a path to unity,

woes and of all our backwardness and

this people’s document declared boldly

reconciliation and democracy.

ignorance today.”

that South Africa belonged to all who live in it, Black and White.

“During my lifetime I have dedicated

It was this article that laid the basis

myself to this struggle of the African

for the formation, in 1912, of the South

Even during the dark and difficult

people. I have fought against white

African Native National Congress, which

days of banning, exile, mass

domination, and I have fought against

later became the African National

detentions, torture, political

black domination. I have cherished the

Congress. The article was the founding

persecutions, assassinations

ideal of a democratic and free society

document of the ANC.

and killings by the apartheid regime,

in which all persons live together in

the ANC remained steadfast in calling

harmony and with equal opportunities.

Writing about the ANC’s founding

for a South Africa that belonged to all

It is an ideal which I hope to live for

conference, Seme had the following

who live in it.

and to achieve. But if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”

(Nelson Mandela, 1964) The history of the ANC is reflected on as a point of departure for its long-standing commitment to an inclusive society and the promotion of social cohesion.

In a seminal article published in October 1911, Pixley ka Isaka Seme, one of the foremost intellectuals at the time, called on Africans to put their differences aside and forge a Native Union.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

17

At its 1969 conference in Morogoro

was principally about building a united,

the ANC initiated community dialogues

in Tanzania, the ANC officially opened

non-racial, non-sexist, democratic and

in all provinces on social cohesion and

its membership and leadership to all

prosperous South Africa. Up to this

nation building in 2011. These commu-

races, transforming itself into a truly

day this remains the guiding vision of

nity dialogues culminated in the first

non-racial organisation both in form

the ANC.

National Summit on Social Cohesion and Nation Building in Kliptown, the

and character. Morogoro also reaffirmed that South Africa belonged to all who

Drawing from the ANC’s rich and proud

live in it.

history of promoting an inclusive

home of the Freedom Charter.

society, the country’s democratic

That historic summit brought togeth-

In articulating an alternative vision

constitution reaffirms that South Africa

er more than 3 000 delegates from

for South Africa, President O.R. Tambo

belongs to all who live in it, united in

across the country representing various

stated: “Our task is to remake our part

our diversity.

religious, political, business and civil

of the world into a corner of the globe

society organisations to take stock of

on which all of humanity – Black and

The National Development Plan: Vision

the process made in uniting the South

White – shall live and work together as

2030, the lodestar to the future, envi-

African nation. Delegates recommitted

equals in conditions of peace and pros-

sions a South Africa where everyone is

themselves to the vision of a South Afri-

perity.” According to the view of O.R.

able to say: “I cannot be without you,

ca where we are one people, one nation,

Tambo, it was the ANC’s responsibility

without you this South African com-

one humanity with a shared destiny.

to break down barriers of division and

munity is an incomplete community,

create a South Africa where there will

without one single person, without one

The summit asserted that true and

be neither Black nor White, just South

single group, without the region or the

lasting reconciliation, social cohesion

Africans free and united in diversity.

continent, we are not the best that we

and nation building is not an event but

can be.”

a process – it is a journey. This journey

The ANC has learnt from its forebears

will require that we redouble our efforts

that the struggle for liberation was

As part of practical efforts to con-

to address key challenges such as

never about replacing one form of

tribute towards building an inclusive

joblessness, poverty, unequal access

oppression with another. The struggle

society and to promote social cohesion,

to opportunities, landlessness, home-

18

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

lessness, the burden of disease, gender

er forget the role played by Braam

inequality and discrimination as well as

Fischer, Dr. Beyers Naude and many

gender-based violence.

other patriots from the Afrikaans

In 1999, Madiba said: “I have great

community in securing our freedom. I

confidence in Afrikaners. They have

It is perhaps time that the declaration

assure all of you that your language,

their name because they considered

and resolutions of the 2012 National

your culture and heritage will continue

themselves to be from Africa. Their

Summit on Social Cohesion and Nation

to be acknowledged, appreciated and

language originated here in Africa. I

Building are revisited and brought to

celebrated. You are as South African,

know that the vast majority of them

life. The ANC stands ready to work to-

as all of us. South Africa is your home.

will continue to help build this African

gether with all those seeking to revive

You are contributing immensely to the

homeland of theirs.”

the letter and spirit of that summit.

development of our society. For that

are free to pursue them.

you have earned the trust and respect

Let us work together to build a South

Sport must continuously be used to

of all South Africans of goodwill. Your

Africa we can all be proud to call home.

build bridges of unity among South Af-

views, your aspirations and your needs

Let us also work together to ensure

ricans, for we know it all too well that

matter, they carry equal worth and

that the ANC remains a home for all

South Africa is a sporting nation and

value as those of your fellow South

South Africans including members of

that sport is the greatest unifier.

Africans. Your dreams are valid. You

the Afrikaans community.

Under the leadership of President Cyril Ramaphosa, the country and the ANC has entered a period of renewal. This moment of renewal is an opportunity to reset the moral compass of the country and the movement. It is an opportunity to recommit to strong and unquestionable leadership. It is also an opportunity to rededicate ourselves

KEY TAKEOUTS • The history of the ANC has a long-standing commitment to an inclusive society and the promotion of social cohesion.

• The Freedom Charter (1956) declared boldly that South Africa belonged to all who live in it, Black and White.

• The vision of the 2012 National Summit on Social Cohesion and Nation Building of

to the goal of building a truly united

a South Africa where we are one people, one nation, one humanity with a shared

South Africa. This is an opportunity

destiny, should be revisited and brought to life.

to restore and maintain the non-racial character of the ANC – to keep the ANC as the Parliament of all the people of South Africa.

It is in this context that I wish to

• The Ramaphosa era is an opportunity to recommit to strong and unquestionable leadership. It is also an opportunity to rededicate ourselves to the goal of building a truly united South Africa.

• The country’s democratic constitution reaffirms that South Africa belongs to all who live in it, united in diversity.

take this opportunity to reassure the

• Sport must continuously be used to build bridges of unity among South Africans.

Afrikaans community in our country

• The ANC views the Afrikaans-speaking community as an integral part of the South

that they are an integral part of the

African landscape, history and heritage and part of the future. Its language, culture

South African landscape, history and

and heritage will continue to be acknowledged, appreciated and celebrated. Their

heritage. Equally, you are part of the future of this country. We will nev-

views, aspirations and needs matter.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

19

DR RUBEN RICHARDS | CHAIRPERSON OF THE RUBEN RICHARDS FOUNDATION

PROTECTING THE IDENTITY OF THE COLOURED COMMUNITY IN SOUTH AFRICA 20

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

KEY TAKEOUTS • Protection of community values and history is central to individual identity.

C

• The current concerns of the Afriondensed Biography: Dr

concerns and anxieties experienced by

Ruben Richards is the Chair-

the Afrikaans-speaking community is

person of the Ruben Rich-

not exclusive to them. He stated: “You

ards Foundation, an NGO

don’t have a copyright on anxiety.” The

with a focus on facilitating healing

anxieties relating to marginalisation,

within the context of trauma. He is

economic exclusion and inability to in-

the former Executive Secretary of the

fluence national policy, continues to be

South African Truth and Reconciliation

experienced by the Coloured community

Commission, former Director General

within the new dispensation.

kaans-speaking community relating to marginalisation and exclusion is not exclusive to this group.

• The Coloured community is continuing to experience exclusion and marginalisation in the new dispensation.

• The current education system produces the NEET generation: Not in Education, Employment and Training.

of the Scorpions, a notable author, community leader within the Coloured

The overarching theme here is inclu-

communities in the Western Cape,

sivity, which begs the question: who

speaker and company director. He also

is excluded? What does one have to

served in executive and leadership

do to be part of this inclusive society?

Cape Flats, sighting issues of gangs

positions in government, higher educa-

Additionally, Richards noted that the

and teenage pregnancies; particularly

tion institutions, the faith community

current education system in South

pregnant teenagers who are carrying

and the private business sector.

Africa produces people who do not find

the babies of gang leaders, which often

a way to be included in society. There

results in child abuse within these

Richards delivered the keynote address

are more than five million people that

immature relationships.

during the Cape Town roundtable dis-

form part of the NEET generation: Not

cussion, during which he stressed the

in Education, Employment or Training.

He also cautioned against stereotyping: “Stereotypes are very, very strong. And

importance of protecting community identity with specific reference to the

Richards highlighted some of the

what we physically represent on the

Coloured community in South Africa.

consequences of exclusion from main-

outside is often what dominates the

Richards emphasised that the current

stream society as experienced on the

initial interactions.”

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

21

THEO VORSTER | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF GALILEO CAPITAL

INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH KEY TO SOCIAL COHESION 22

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

T

heo Vorster, the CEO of Galileo Capital and economic market commentator, served as a keynote speaker for the Pretoria roundtable discussion.

Vorster began his address by stating the following: “I think the key point of departure is that for any complicated problem, there's a simple solution that doesn’t work. Our problems are complicated, then so are the solutions.”

Vorster presented on the current lack of economic growth in South Africa and eluded to factors such as the departure of critical skills and the loss of influential private sector business, which further exacerbates the stunted economic growth in the country.

In the early 1990s there was a close correlation between South Africa’s GDP growth rate and that of the rest of the world. In fact, the GDP per capita tracked the rest of the world. In 2012/2013, that correlation broke.

Currently, the GDP per capita in the rest of the world is nearly 50% higher than that of South Africa and, consequently, South Africa is now 12 years behind.

been closer to 20%, instead of 30%.

Reconciliation, social cohesion and keeping skills in South Africa is easy if the economy is growing. But if it is a struggling economy, we have the unfortunate situation whereby the people who can afford to – those with capital, and the talented – leave the country. Therefore, due to the current context we find ourselves in, the GDP growth will need to come from the private sector. Koos Bekker is known for saying that there are only a few people that grow the economy: engineers and entrepreneurs; and in our case, these are the people that are leaving.

Additionally, Vorster also noted that the Afrikaans business community is a major contributor to economic growth and could help to create employment opportunities and encourage much-needed

inclusive growth through private sector business.

Vorster cited the example of Naspers, which in the late 1990s was a company with a market capital of roughly R6-billion. Today, Naspers is worth R1.2-trillion and constitutes 10% of the national GDP. Approximately R1 in R10, of every government employee’s pension is invested in Naspers, the biggest company on the JSE. The Afrikaans business community can contribute immensely to economic growth, business development, creating employment and opportunities.

In conclusion Vorster indicated that inclusive growth must be a focal point of government towards addressing the current economic climate, combatting unemployment and the eroding effects this has on the national GDP.

KEY TAKEOUTS • Economic growth and stability are necessary for reconciliation, social cohesion, and the retention of skills and investment to be successful in South Africa.

For several years, economic growth was at 5%, which means that the economy doubles every 15 years. If the growth is at 1%, the economy will double every 72 years. Therefore, at a growth of 0.5%, the economy will take 150 years to double.

• Due to the current context we find ourselves in, the GDP growth will need to come

If South Africa had kept track with the rest of the world, the economy would have been at a 15% growth rate and the unemployment rate would have

rent economic climate, combatting unemployment and the eroding effects this has

from the private sector.

• The Afrikaans business community is a major contributor to economic growth and can help to create employment opportunities and encourage much-needed inclusive growth through private sector business.

• Inclusive growth must be a focal point of government towards addressing the curon the national GDP.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

23

SUMMARY OF GENERAL CONVERSATIONS

WORKING TOGETHER TO BUILD ONE NATION 24

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

A SNAPSHOT

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

25

26

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

27

28

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

KEY TAKEOUTS • Dialogue can no longer be conducted simply for the sake of engaging.

• The principles that unify us as South Africans must drive us towards a common goal.

• The conduct of national leadership and community leaders in public platforms cannot continue to be pervasive and counterproductive in shaping a non-racial and unified society.

• Collaborative space between government, the private sector and civil society must be opened up for all to provide their inputs.

• Action plans must be formulated to effectively address the issues identified and influence decision-making processes in government.

• All South Africans have a contribution to make in shaping the narrative around national identity, unity and promoting the principles captured in the constitution.

• The Inclusive Society Institute is encouraged to facilitate future roundtable discussions of this nature which allow for robust debate to occur and continue. This will contribute to the promotion of a unified and cohesive society.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

29

ANNEXURE A

TABULATED LIST OF CONCERNS Following the Cape Town and Pretoria engagements with members of the Afrikaans community on their place and role in South African society, the following concerns, be it perceived or real, were identified: CONCERNS IDENTIFIED 1.

Engagements towards improved dialogue need to be succeeded by action and the implementation of resolutions

2.

The lack of vision and reliable leadership from government has resulted in distrust, apathy and disenfranchisement among the citizenry

3.

Lack of accountability and transparency from national leadership. Inability to hold those implicated in corruption responsible

4.

Need for diversification of voices in leadership to inspire citizens towards action and activism

5.

No clear definition and direction from leadership on national unity and how this can be achieved

30

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

6.

Efforts towards social cohesion are threatened by comments and messaging from political leaders that deepen societal divides

7.

Disconnect between what young South Africans understand regarding the intended outcomes and principles forged during the South African transition and the manifestation of these desired outcomes in their lives today

8.

Continued use of racial differentiation in legislation and policy including the use of ‘Blacks in general and Africans in particular’, which perpetuates exclusion and discrimination against other races and cultures not part of this classification

9.

Discrimination against minorities through legislation and policies resulting in political and economic disempowerment

10.

Youth feel excluded from the political agenda and lack opportunities to participate

11.

Lack of civic participation in holding government officials accountable and promoting good governance

12.

No visible application of constitutional principles that form the foundations of national unity, tolerance and inclusive society

13.

The growing crisis of unemployment has been acknowledged; however, more practical plans need to be developed to effect change

14.

Increasing levels of youth unemployment and a lack of initiatives aimed at absorbing unemployed graduates into the workforce

15.

Economic stagnation and difficulty of doing business in South Africa

16.

Discriminatory nature of policies such as BBBEE and affirmative action

17.

Competent, skilled and willing individuals feel they are overlooked when it comes to selection for programmes and initiatives aimed at solving the economic crisis in the country, due to politics playing a role in selection

18.

Need for mentorship initiatives, training and skills transfer programmes

19.

The loss of critical skills and qualified individuals as a result of lack of opportunities and stagnant economic growth

20.

Urgent intervention in the education sector is needed, regarding the quality and level of education, shortage of educators and resources, and home-language teaching

21.

Clear vision on economic reform and the empowerment of private sector business towards contributing to solutions

22.

Lack of clarity on issues of property rights, land redistribution without compensation and the status of the NDR

23.

Concerns regarding the status and protection of constitutional principles, as well as attacks on the Judiciary

24.

Government continues to pursue avenues and legislative decisions that do not result in positive outcomes or visible effective changes/improvements

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

31

ANNEXURE B

ACTION PLAN TO ADDRESS ISSUES AND CONCERNS RAISED AT THE DIALOGUES 32

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

The concerns raised during the two dialogues, as captured in the tabulated list of concerns (Annexure A), can be broadly grouped into three action types: • The first group of concerns are those for which political leaders and policymakers need sensitisation and which they need to take heed of in their policy formulations and public pronouncements.

• The second group of concerns are those concerns that require further dialogue between the political leadership,

policymakers and the Afrikaans-speaking community.

• The third group of concerns are those that require further policy research and/or analysis.

The concerns are grouped hereunder within an action plan that sets out the concern, action required, the body to be engaged and the target deadline for concluding the action.

GROUP 1: Issues and concerns requiring sensitisation of political leadership and policymakers Concern/Issue

Action required

Body to engage

Date

Engagements towards improved dialogue need to be succeeded by action and the implementation of resolutions

Presentation of report findings: ANC Treasurer General, ISI CEO and ISI social cohesion project facilitator

ANC NEC

Jun ‘20

The lack of vision and reliable leadership from government has resulted in distrust, apathy and disenfranchisement among the citizenry Lack of accountability and transparency from national leadership.

Inability to hold those implicated in corruption responsible Need for diversification of voices in leadership to inspire citizens towards action and activism Efforts towards social cohesion are threatened by comments and messaging from political leaders that deepen societal divides Concerns regarding the status and protection of constitutional principles, as well as attacks on the Judiciary

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

33

GROUP 2: Issues and concerns requiring further dialogue Concern/Issue

Action required

Body to engage

Date

No clear definition and direction from leadership on national unity and how this can be achieved

• Dialogue with Afrikaans-speaking communities on their definition and proposed direction that leadership should take in promoting national unity • Engage ANC NEC

• Expand existing Afrikaans-speaking focus groups

Jul ‘20

• ANC NEC

Oct ‘20

• Disconnect between what young South Africans understand regarding the intended outcomes and principles forged during the South African transition and the manifestation of these desired outcomes in their lives today • Youth feel excluded from the political agenda and lack opportunities to participate

Arrange a structured dialogue with young leaders representing the South African demographics

Youth leaders drawn from higher education institutions, civil society and business

Aug ‘20

Continued use of racial differentiation in legislation and policy including the use of ‘Blacks in general and Africans in particular’, which perpetuates exclusion and discrimination against other races and cultures not part of this classification

Arrange a dialogue between the Coloured community and ANC NEC subcommittee for Social Transformation

Representatives drawn from Coloured community organisations, civil society and business representatives

Nov ‘20

Need for mentorship initiatives, training and skills transfer programmes

Arrange re-engagement of business and other interested parties with COGTA to give impetus to already existing agreements re mentorship programmes at local government level

Leaders drawn from business community, Public Private Growth Initiative (PPGI) and COGTA

Sep ‘20

Urgent intervention in the education sector is needed, regarding the quality and level of education, shortage of educators and resources, and home-language teaching

Arrange dialogue between education and business fraternity and the DHE & DBE

DHE, DBE and education fraternity

Dec ‘20

Discriminatory nature of policies such as BBBEE and affirmative action

Arrange a dialogue between business and ANC Economic Transformation Committee to discuss the discrepancy between the intended vs achieved outcomes associated with BBBEE

Public Private Growth Initiative (PPGI) and ANC NEC Subcommittee on Economic Transformation

Aug ‘20

34

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

GROUP 3: Issues and concerns requiring further policy research and/or analysis Concern/Issue

Action required

Body to engage

Date

Lack of accountability and transparency from national leadership. Inability to hold those implicated in corruption responsible

Commission an analysis of reported high-profile crimes and current status of the administration of justice in these regard

Inclusive Society Institute research subcommittee

To be determined

Efforts towards social cohesion are threatened by comments and messaging from political leaders that deepen societal divides

Commission research into (i) the divisive narrative by political and government leaders and its impact on social cohesion, and (ii) ways to enhance and mobilise the centre forces of society to build an inclusive society

Inclusive Society Institute research subcommittee

To be determined

Discrimination against minorities through legislation and policies resulting in political and economic disempowerment

Commission stakeholder engagements to understand concerns and then analyse the implementation and impact of the legislation

Inclusive Society Institute research subcommittee

To be determined

Lack of civic participation in holding government officials accountable and promoting good governance

The Inclusive Society Institute is of the opinion that much work is being done in this regard by civil society

No visible application of constitutional principles that form the foundations of national unity, tolerance and inclusive society

Commission a comparative analysis between the constitutional principles and progress made since 1994

Inclusive Society Institute research subcommittee

To be determined

• The growing crisis of unemployment has been acknowledged; however, more practical plans need to be developed to effect change • Increasing levels of youth unemployment and a lack of initiatives aimed at absorbing unemployed graduates into the workforce • Economic stagnation and difficulty of doing business in South Africa • Need for mentorship initiatives, training and skills transfer programmes • Clear vision on economic reform and the empowerment of private sector business towards contributing to solutions • Lack of clarity on issues of property rights, land redistribution without compensation and the status of the NDR

Incorporate concerns into the research brief of the ISI’s comprehensive economic policy research project. Afrikaans-speaking community focus groups to form part of the stakeholder engagements

Inclusive Society Institute research subcommittee

Mar ‘21

The loss of critical skills and qualified individuals as a result of lack of opportunities and stagnant economic growth

Commission research into emigration trends

Inclusive Society Institute research subcommittee

To be determined

Government continues to pursue avenues and legislative decisions that do not result in positive outcomes or visible effective changes/improvements

Commission research to test the validity of this sentiment

Inclusive Society Institute research subcommittee

To be determined

The outcome of each action will serve as the basis for engaging the political and policymaking leaders of the country and/or to motivate further investigation/research.

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

|

35

NOTES

36

|

REPORT ON THE SOCIAL COHESION SURVEY

T h i s r e p o r t h a s b e e n p u bl i s h e d b y t h e I n cl u s i v e S o c i e t y I n s t i t u t e.

The Inclusive Society

through a value system

tates international and

Institute (ISI) is an

that embodies the social

multilateral cooperation.

autonomous and inde-

and national democratic

As such, the ISI also

pendent institution that

principles associated

seeks to achieve its

functions independently

with a developmental

ideals at a global level

from any other entity.

state. It recognises

through cooperation

It is founded for the

that a well-functioning

with like-minded parties

purpose of supporting

democracy requires

and organs of civil

and further deepening

well-functioning politi-

society who share its

multi-party democracy.

cal formations that are

basic values.

suitably equipped and The ISI’s work is moti-

capacitated. It further

In South Africa, ISI’s

vated by its desire to

acknowledges that

ideological positioning is

achieve non-racialism,

South Africa is inex-

aligned with that of the

non-sexism, social jus-

tricably linked to the

African National Con-

tice and cohesion, eco-

ever-transforming and

gress (ANC) and others

nomic development and

interdependent global

in broader society with

equality in South Africa,

world, which necessi-

similar ideals.

www.inclusivesociety.org.za