Evaluation report establishment of district industrial home Nankana sahib & Chiniot

Page 1

Evaluation Report of the Project ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL HOME (SANATZAR) CHINIOT & NANKANA SAHIB

DIRECTORATE GENERAL MONITORING & EVALUATION, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 72 - Garden Block, Garden Town, Lahore .Pakistan Tel: +92-42-99233177-91 www.dgmepunjab.gov.pk / info@dgmepunjab.gov.pk

December 2017


[This page is intentionally left blank] ii | P a g e


A CRONYMS ADP

Annual Development Programme

DGM&E

Directorate General Monitoring & Evaluation

DIH

District Industrial Home

DDSC

Departmental Development Sub Committee

EPB

Export Promotion Bureau

MIS

Management Information System

O&M

Operation & Maintenance

PC-I

Planning Commission Performa-I

PC-IV

Planning Commission Performa-IV

P&DD

Planning & Development Department

PD

Project Director

RBM

Result Based Monitoring

SNE

Schedule of New Expenditures

SW & BMD

Social Welfare & Bait-ul-Maal Department

SAMEDA

Small And Medium Enterprises Development Authority

TDAP

Trade Development Authority of Pakistan

iii | P a g e


T ABLE OF C ONTENTS Acronyms ...........................................................................................................iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................v List of Figures & Graphs.................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 1.1 History of SW&BMD ......................................................................................... 3 1.2 Functions of SW&BMD ..................................................................................... 4 1.3 Project Description & Justification ................................................................... 4 1.4 Project at a Glance ........................................................................................... 5 1.5 Project Objectives and Interventions ............................................................... 6 1.6 Discussion on Project Implementation Strategy .............................................. 6 1.7 Project Staff as Approvedin PC-I .................................................................... 10 2 Evaluation Methodology .............................................................................................11 2.1 The Evaluation Report: Purpose & Structure ................................................. 12 2.2 Team Formation ............................................................................................. 12 2.3 Documents Review ......................................................................................... 12 2.4 Identification of Key Indicators ...................................................................... 13 2.5 Project Site Visits ............................................................................................ 13 2.6 Interviews with Project Officials .................................................................... 14 2.7 Project Beneficiaires’ Survey .......................................................................... 14 3 DG M&E Assessment DG M&E Assessment...................................................................15 3.1 Physical targets & Achievments vs. DG M&E Assessment ............................. 15 3.2 Financial Assessment (Planned Vs. Actual) .................................................... 16 3.2.1 Yearly Cost Breakdown................................................................................... 16 3.2.2 ADP Allocation vs. Actual Release .................................................................. 17 3.3 Project Procurement ...................................................................................... 17 3.4 Project duration.............................................................................................. 19 3.5 Process Analysis.............................................................................................. 19 3.5.1 Training Centre Analysis ................................................................................. 20 3.5.2 Certified Trainees Analysis ............................................................................ 22 3.4.3 Production Centre Analysis ............................................................................ 27 3.5.4 DIH (Sanatzar) Management Analysis ............................................................ 28 4 Observations ..........................................................................................................30 5 Recommendations ......................................................................................................31 Annexure – A Advisory Body – Chiniot & Nankana Sahib ...............................................32 Annexure – B Buildings of DIH(Sanatzar) .........................................................................34 Annexure –C Schedule of New Expenditures (SNE) for Project Staff .................................35

iv | P a g e


L IST OF T ABLES Table 1 Project at a glance ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2 Project Staff - DIH(Sanatzar) Nankana Sahib ............................................................................................... 10 Table 3 Project Staff – DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot .......................................................................................................... 10 Table 4 Project Site Visits ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 5 Interview with Project Officials.................................................................................................................... 14 Table 6 Sample Size Collection ................................................................................................................................. 14 Table 7 Physical Targets & Achievements vs DG M&E Assessment ......................................................................... 15 Table 8 Planned vs Actual Expenditures................................................................................................................... 16 Table 9 ADP Allocation vs. Actual Release ............................................................................................................... 17 Table 10 Procurement of Furniture & Fixture .......................................................................................................... 17 Table 11 Procurement of Machinery & Equipment ................................................................................................. 18 Table 12 Enrolled & Certified Trainees ..................................................................................................................... 20 Table 13 Training/Trade wise Status, Nankana Sahib .............................................................................................. 21 Table 14 Training/Trade wise Status, Chiniot........................................................................................................... 21 Table 15 Certified Trainees & Registered Trainees at Production (Work & Earn) Centers ...................................... 27

v|Page


L IST OF F IGURES & G RAPHS Figure 1: Schematic Flow/ Diagram of Evaluation Process ...................................................................................... 11 Graph 2 Year wise Planned Vs. Actual Expenditures ................................................................................................ 16 Graph 3 ADP Allocation vs Actual Release ............................................................................................................... 17 Graph 4 Enrolled vs. Certified Trainees ................................................................................................................... 20 Graph 5 Training vs. Trade wise status, Nankana Sahib ........................................................................................... 21 Graph 6 Training vs. Trade wise status, Chiniot ....................................................................................................... 22 Graph 7 Advertisement of DIH (Sanatzar) Services ................................................................................................. 23 Graph 8 Why did you join the Sanatzar.................................................................................................................... 23 Graph 9 Process of Course Selection at DIH (Sanatzar)........................................................................................... 24 Graph 10 Qualification level of Trainees at DIH (Sanatzar) ...................................................................................... 24 Graph 11 Reason to select DIH (Sanatzar) ............................................................................................................... 25 Graph 12 Quality of Training/Trade at DIH (Sanatzar) ............................................................................................. 25 Graph 13 Employment Status.................................................................................................................................. 26 Graph 14 Income after getting Training .................................................................................................................. 26 Graph 15 Socio-Economic Empowerment ............................................................................................................... 27 Graph 16 Certified & Registered Trainees ................................................................................................................ 28 Graph 17 Attitude of the Instructor at DIH (Sanatzar) ............................................................................................. 28 Graph 18 Satisfaction with the Intervention ............................................................................................................ 29

vi | P a g e


[This page is intentionally left blank] vii | P a g e


E XECUTIVE S UMMARY The main purpose of this terminal evaluation was to review the implementation process, achievement of objectives and drawn lessons of the project entitled “Establishment of District Industrial Homes (Sanatzar) at Chiniot & Nankana Sahib.” Main focus of terminal evaluation was on efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability criteria to assess the extent to which annual development scheme has achieved its physical targets and achievements as well as to take decision about transfer of project to non-development side. First PC-I was approved with cost of Rs. 30.278 Million and later on revised with the approved cost of Rs. 31.816 Million. The project “Establishment of District Industrial Homes at Nankana Sahib and Chiniot” was conceived in September 2014 with gestation period of two years till September 2016. But latter on PC-I was revised and gestation period extended for nine months till June 2017. DG M&E team had adopted participatory monitoring and evaluation methodology. The team had a comprehensive review of desk literature, PC-I, PC-IV and other necessary required documents. Data analysis was carried out. Detailed field visits of project districts were planned and executed during the evaluation process. Although the target of certified trainees is achieved at both District Industrial Homes (DIH) (Sanatzars) yet registration of certified trainees could not be achieved at production (work and earn) centers. Management of both DIH (Sanatzars) has not developed course calendars. Equipment and machinery was not in accordance with requirements of enrolled trainees. Neither production (work & earn) centers are established nor display centers. Both the DIH (Sanatzars) have started working in rented buildings but their managers could not identify suitable land for construction of permanent buildings as planned in PC-I. At both DIH (Sanatzar) managers are on additional charge and craft designers are not hired. Some of the physical targets are achieved; others are either partially or not achieved. On the basis of findings of DG M&E team it is concluded that the achievements of planned physical targets is partially satisfactory.

Faisal Aziz (Individual Consultant)

1|Page


1 I NTRODUCTION The project was conceived “to achieve the ultimate goals of welfare state through socio-economic uplift of people free from economic adversity, discrimination and vulnerability with special emphasis on empowerment of women both socially and economically� with major objectives to improve the skills of women to increase their livelihood opportunities and to uplift the social and economic stature of women in the society by promoting women entrepreneurships and business development. The concept of social welfare is not new in our country. The spirit of doing well to the fellow beings and the enthusiasm for taking part in activities for the well-being of the under-privileged can be traced back to times immemorial. The concept of Social Welfare in Pakistan is drawn from the cardinal principles of Islam based on Adl-o-Ehsan and Haqooq-ul-Ibad, making the state and society together responsible for the welfare of the people. It is on the basis of the national constitution that the government has established Social Welfare Department. This department has sought to serve the development and rehabilitation needs of the weaker sections of society especially the physically and socially handicapped, women and children, the vulnerable sections of the community in rural and urban areas. The idea of district industrial homes works towards economic empowerment of downtrodden, disadvantaged, marginalized local women of low income families. It works towards the betterment of native women with the utilization of their spare and leisure time by imparting training and engaging them for production. After getting training these industrial homes register their passed out trainees and give them order work by which they earn money to uplift the financial status of their families. District industrial home is training cum production center commonly known as SANATZAR. The initiative for district industrial homes was taken back in 1979 in all districts of Punjab. It was initiated for socio-economic empowerment of local women of each district of Punjab by imparting training and through work order. Presently District industrial homes are working in 36 district head quarter of Punjab. Nankana sahib and Chiniot emerged as independent districts in 2009 and 2011 respectively so that industrial homes were established here now. The main concept is to utilize spare and leisure time of women by engaging them to learn new skills for their livelihood. Almost half of the population is feminine so it is quintessential to make them asset rather than liability. Having training in particular skill and working at their own will make them economically independent. According to the economic survey of Pakistan 2016-17 near about 29% of the population is living below poverty line so strengthening the capacity of industrial home (Sanatzar) should be prioritized for socio-economic empowerment of the marginalized segment of society. 2|Page


1.1

HISTORY OF SW&BMD

In 1951 when the Government of Pakistan sought the assistance of the United Nations with a view to formulate a social welfare program befitting a free country. A year later the first batch of the UN Social Welfare consultants arrived in Karachi and this marked the beginning of a new orientation in the field of social welfare. In the absence of trained social workers, they advised the government to give priority to social work training as without qualified workers, social welfare projects and programs cannot be properly implemented. On the recommendation of the UN Adviser, the Government of Pakistan (Health Division) drew up a plan for initiating an organized social welfare program in the country in 1953. In the initial stage the government’s responsibilities were confined to imparting social work training, encouraging voluntary agencies and sponsoring of urban and rural community development projects. The government, thenceforth, set up a Planning Board in 1953 to prepare a plan of economic development for the country. A social welfare section was created in the Planning Board to investigate social problems and social needs arising out of social change and economic development in the country; to review the social policies and legislation in the various fields of social welfare; and to prepare a five-year plan for social welfare programs. This section was later on named as the National Planning Commission. The Council was created in 1956 to stimulate the welfare activities of the voluntary organization by providing financial assistance and consultative services. Subsequently, provincial councils were formed in the provinces with the objective of helping the voluntary welfare agencies both in expansion and coordination. The central Directorate of Social Welfare was abolished in 1962 as a result of decentralization of certain subjects under the new constitution. In September, 1964 the Directorate General of Social Welfare was created in the government of the then West Pakistan. After the dismemberment of one unit in West Pakistan in July, 1970 the former provinces of Sindh, Punjab, NWFP and Baluchistan were revived. As result the West Pakistan Directorate General of Social Welfare and the West Pakistan Council of Social Welfare were bifurcated into four parts. One Directorate and one Council were established in each province as such. In other words, two organizations have principally been set up by the provincial governments to look after social welfare programs in their respective provinces. In 1979 a separate department of Social Welfare was established. Afterwards in 1996, the segment of Women Development and in 1998 the segment of 3|Page


Bait-ul-Maal was also attached with Social Welfare Department. Later on in 2012, a separate department of Women Development was established and the segment of women development was separated from Social Welfare and Bait-ul-Maal Department. 1.2

FUNCTIONS OF SW&BMD

According to Rules of Business 2011, Social Welfare and Bait-ul-Maal Department perform following functions: 

Registration, technical assistance and monitoring of social welfare agencies

Social protection including institutional care, skill development and rehabilitation

Registration, assessment, training, employment, and rehabilitation of disabled persons

Eradication of social evils

Coordination with and grant-in-aid to non-governmental organizations engaged in the field of narcotics control and rehabilitation of drug addicts

1.3

Relief during calamities and emergencies

Financial assistance to poor and needy through Punjab Bait-ul-Maal PROJECT DESCRIPTION & JUSTIFICATION

District industrial homes (Sanatzar) are work & earn centres established by Social Welfare Department across 34 districts of Punjab. These industrial homes work towards the socio economic empowerment of local women through imparting various technical & vocational skills to them. Sanatzar have two major components i.e. Training & Production. It provides different short and long term certificate training courses in different marketable skills. One major aim of Sanatzar is the promotion of local art and crafts, its renaissance and fusion with modern trends to keep alive the handicrafts of that particular region. Second component is production which comprises of centre work and order work. Through order work, trained women are provided work assignments which some individual or company can order, they have to prepare it and charge for it. At production centre, Sanatzar gets some work order and engage the registered trained workers for completion of work order and pay the workers accordingly. The other related activities of Sanatzars are as following:  Preparing prototypes of local crafts popular in each district and to supply their standard designs to local and foreign markets to obtain bulk supply orders.

4|Page


 Opening / strengthening the existing / new smaller centres at tehsil/town level with local participation on matching basis  Establishing liaisons with Small Industries Corporation, Export Promotion Bureau, and similar related agencies.  Organizing exhibitions for the purpose of popularizing the products of these industrial homes. Also providing additional outlet for marketing of these products.  Training of teachers of industrial homes located at lower level at the district industrial home or through mobile team of the technical staff of DIH. After devolution of power in 2002, Nankana Sahib in 2009 and Chiniot in 2011 emerged as independent districts, therefore district industrial home could not be established there earlier. Each district has its own individual culture and crafts e.g. Chiniot is famous for its wood work, embroidery from Raja village and parades from Lillian. These crafts are not only the recognition of this district but also help the local women earn through making these crafts. Nankana sahib is frequently visited by tourists and Sikh community. Thus promotion of local culture and its sale in local market can be very beneficial for local women. Therefore, for the economic uplift of local women, the establishment of district industrial homes is mandatory. 1.4

PROJECT AT A GLANCE

The Project brief, as described below in Table 1, provides an overview of the project that entails a project to reflect its progress from an idea or feasibility study to a formal approval, implementation /execution and ultimately for evaluation Table 1 reflects project brief at glace describing project locations, budgets and generation period Table 1 Project at a glance

Project Title

Establishment of District Industrial Homes (Sanatzar) at Chiniot &Nankana Sahib

Location

Chiniot & Nankana Sahib

Sponsoring Agency

Government of the Punjab

Executing Agency

Social Welfare & Bait-ul-Maal, Department, Punjab

Operation & Maintenance

Social Welfare & Bait-ul-Maal, Department, Punjab

PC- I Cost 29th August 2014

Rs. 30.278 Million 5|Page


Revised PC-I Cost 11th November 2016

Rs. 31.816 Million

PC-IV Actual Cost

Rs. 23.839 Million

Planned Date of Completion 29th August 2014 Revised Date of Completion 11th November 2016

June 2016 June 2017

Actual Date of Completion as per PC-IV June 2017 Actual Gestation Period

33 Months

Beneficiaries

Young women and girls

1.5

PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND INTERVENTIONS

One major aim of Sanatzar is the promotion of local art and crafts, its renaissance and fusion with modern trends to keep alive the handicrafts of that particular region. Main Objectives of establishing Industrial Home (Sanatzar) are as under: 

Socio economic empowerment of local women through skill development

Creating an opportunity of self-employment through order work for the native women

Promotion of fusion of local arts and crafts of the district with the market trends

Main Interventions as mentioned under Input in Result Based Monitoring are as under; I. Hiring of suitable buildings of sanatzars II. Purchase of Furniture & Equipment III. Provision of Transport Facility IV. Recruitment, Hiring & Posting of Staff V. Training Courses VI. Display of finished products 1.6 DISCUSSION ON PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

1.6.1 Project Implementation Strategy: These industrial homes were established in rented buildings. After successful completion of this project and evaluation of the project from Planning & Development Department, in coming years, prototype building of these centres would be constructed. 6|Page


At a time, training in 05 out of 09 different courses in different skills is being provided at each Sanatzar. The duration of these courses is for 3 months (short courses) and six months (long courses). A comprehensive course calendar will be developed determining the courses for each quarter of the year. Each course will accommodate approximately 20-25 workers/ trainees at a time. Five craft instructors will be hired from market @ Rs. 30,000/- per month on contract basis with the consultation of advisory body. Additional vocational instructors (if required) will be hired from the local market on profit sharing basis. After completing the training, a test will be conducted and only those passing the test will be awarded the certificate. Any woman whether familiar with the basic skills or not can be admitted into these Sanatzar. A media campaign will be developed for promotion of this project through print and electronic media. These Sanatzars will have two major components (a) Training (b) Production Centre. After getting training, those trainees who got certificate and registered themselves as workers with Sanatzar, would be able to work in production centre on daily wages. Management will arrange work orders for the production centres as well as order work on individual basis. A display centre will be established within sanatzar so that the items prepared can be exhibited there. In this way creating opportunities for sales, order work and supply work for the trainees. Following is a broad outline of the courses going to be offered at these sanatzars. However it is pertinent to mention that courses are not limited to just these courses but any course which compliments the local art and crafts can be offered at this centre or any other course on the demand of trainees /workers.

Sr. No.

Courses

1

Dress making

2

Hand & machine embroidery

3

Ada Work

4

Cooking

5

Computer courses

6

English language course

7

Personal grooming & Parlor work

8

Dress making

9

Wood work (Chiniot) 7|Page


Both sanatzars will be provided working capital amounting to Rs. 500,000/- each. This will be the revolving amount to pay wages to the workers promptly as well as purchase of raw material for the work order placed with district industrial home. A Market oriented strategy will be evolved to prepare the products according to the prevailing trends for adding value to the finished goods of these Sanatzars. Exhibitions and sales fares will be arranged periodically. Moreover efforts will be made by the management of these Sanatzars to participate in local fares and exhibitions as well. In this context linkages will be developed with SAMEDA, EPB, TDAP, chamber of Commerce etc. to keep these Sanatzar updated about their latest venture, so that they could take part in those events. Advisory body will be constituted for managing and monitoring the working of these Sanatzars. 1.6.2 Discussion on Implementation Strategy: Implementation strategy mentioned 09 separate courses in different skills at each sanatzar. But there was no baseline survey conducted for need assessment of these courses. No course calendars were shared with DG M&E team during field visits by management of both sanatzars. During in-house data analysis and field visits certain variations were observed in the number of enrolled workers/trainees and the prescribed limit of 20-25 In DIH (sanatzar) at Chiniot hired only 02 instructors and remaining 03 as volunteers for 05 different courses/skills. For effective and efficient utilization of both components i.e. training and production of DIH (Sanatzar) database /management information system should be developed and connected with central server at DG SW&BMD. Online database should be supervised and updated in real time for smooth tracking in real time of course calendar, status of enrollment, certification from training component. Registration of certified trainees, display centre, dates of exhibitions & fares, status of work orders, form production centre and Geo tagging of DIH (Sanatzar) buildings, list with contact details of advisory body members, marketing partners of DIH (Sanatzar). Advisory body is constituted for managing and monitoring the working of DIH (Sanatzar). DG SW&BMD notifies Advisory Body (Notification at Annexure–A) for two years with consultation of manager and head of local government authorities. DG SW&BMD, managers should organize multi stakeholder’s consultative dialogue with heads of local governments, technical experts from specialized agencies such as SMEDA, TDAP, EPB, PITB, TEVTA as well as successful entrepreneurs, civil society, philanthropists, policy makers along with representatives from chamber of commerce, relevant departments of governments to review, restructure for further strengthening and improving the 8|Page


existing structure of Advisory Body after 18th amendment and for sustainable and impact oriented capacity building of local women. Both DIH (Sanatzar) could not establish and make functional production centres. No certified trainees were being registered nor did being provide work orders at their homes. It is adversely impacting the project objective of socio-economic empowerment of local women. Both DIH (Sanatzar) badly failed to design a market oriented strategy in order to evolve and prepare the products according to the prevailing trends for adding value to the finished goods of these Sanatzars. To arrange exhibitions and sales fares periodically on regular basis is the most effective marketing tool. But both sanatzars seemed reluctant to use it either due to technical incompetence or financial constraints. Management of these Sanatzars made efforts to participate in local fares and exhibitions but could not get work orders for their institutions. In the context of marketing strategy no linkages developed with SAMEDA, EPB, TDAP, chamber of Commerce etc. to keep these Sanatzar updated about their latest venture, in order to take part in those events. Social Entrepreneurship is very much emerging trend in developing societies for poverty reduction, gender equality and social inclusion. DG SW&BMD, Managers, Advisory Bodies should collaborate and make institutional arrangements with National Rural Support Program (NRSP), AKHUWAT other financial, non-financial institutions providing micro finance services for their certified trainees who get themselves register with (production centre) at their DIH (Sanatzar) on priority basis.

9|Page


1.7

PROJECT STAFF AS APPROVEDIN PC-I

Following posts were created through this project. Current status of posts created through this project is as under; Table 2 Project Staff – DIH (Sanatzar) Nankana Sahib

Sr.

Position

BPS

Part/full Time

1

Manager

18

Full time

No. of Current Status of Posts Posts 1 Additional Charge 1

2

Craft Designer

17

Full time

1

1 Vacant

3 4 5 6

Assistant Market Organizer Junior Clerk Store Keeper

16 11 11 05

Full time Full time Full time Full time

1 1 1 1

7

Driver

04

Full time

1

8

Peon

01

Full time

2

Filled Filled Filled Filled Filled *No Purchase of Transport Facility Filled

9

Sweeper

01

Full time

1

Filled

10

Chowkidar

01

Full time

1

Filled

Table 3 Project Staff – DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot Sr.

Position

BPS

Part/full Time

No. Posts

of Current Status of Posts

1

Manager

18

Full time

1

1 Additional Charge

2

Craft Designer

17

Full time

1

1 Vacant

3 4 5 6

Assistant Market Organizer Junior Clerk Store Keeper

16 11 11 05

Full time Full time Full time Full time

1 1 1 1

7

Driver

04

Full time

1

8

Peon

01

Full time

2

Filled Filled Filled Filled Filled *No Purchase of Transport Facility Filled

9

Sweeper

01

Full time

1

Filled

10

Chowkidar

01

Full time

1

Filled

10 | P a g e


2

E VALUATION M ETHODOLOGY

Following scheme has been used to carry out evaluation of the project as elaborated in flow chart at figure 1.

TEAM FORMATION

PC-I REVIEW

PROJECT DOCUMENTS REVIEW

PC-IV REVIEW

OTHERS OBJECTIVES COST

IDENTIFYING PROJECT KEY INDICATORS

FINANCIAL ACHIEVEMENTS

DURATION

SITE VISITS

PHYSICAL ACHIEVEMENTS

PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES AND DATA COLLECTION

PERIODIC PHYSICAL PROGRESS REPORTS

PERIODIC FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORTS

INTERVIEWS

PROCUREMENT RECORDS SITE SNAPS

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION PROJECT COST ANALYSIS

DGM&E ASSESSMENT

OBSERVATIONS/ RECOMMENDATION

REPORT SUBMISSION

Figure 1: Schematic Flow/ Diagram of Evaluation Process

11 | P a g e


2.1

THE EVALUATION REPORT: PURPOSE & STRUCTURE

This evaluation report is divided into 5 different parts. The first part starts with introduction giving details about the project domain and structure of the project evaluation report. The second part of this report focuses on evaluation methodology, followed by documents review, selection of performance indicators, project site visit plan etc. The third part of the report depicts the DGM&E’s assessment pertaining to the actual status of the project performance against its planned objectives and data analysis based on project cost and beneficiary analysis of the project. The fourth part of report consists of observations regarding the project activities made by the evaluation team of DGM&E, P&D Department. The fifth part reflects recommendations for improvement in running process as well suggestions for the effective usage of available resources. This section addresses the suggestions for improvement in project planning and execution as well as, identifying matters requiring follow up actions. The rationale for the recommendations is clearly explained and linked with the information collected during the evaluation. 2.2

TEAM FORMATION

Evaluation team was constituted under the patronage of Director General (M&E) in a meeting held in the office of DGM&E for evaluation of the “Establishment of District Industrial Home (Sanatzar) Chiniot & Nankana Sahib” project having expertise in project’s domain, data collection methods, data analysis and interpretation along with preparation of evaluation report. The project was assigned to Mr. Faisal Aziz (Individual Consultant) DGM&E, P&D Department. Report Review: 

Mr. Ghazanfar Mubeen (Sr. Specialist R & D )

Project Field Visits: 

Mr. Faisal Aziz (Individual Consultant)

Mr. Ihsan Nadir (Project Assistant)

In-House Data Analysis & Report Writing: 

Mr. Faisal Aziz (Individual Consultant)

Mr. Ihsan Nadir (Project Assistant)

2.3

DOCUMENTS REVIEW

Following project documents, evaluation tools and techniques were consulted. 

Planning Commission Form-I (PC-I, Original) of the Project

Revised Planning Commission Form-I (PC-I, Original) of the Project 12 | P a g e


Planning Commission Form-IV (PC-IV) of the Project

DG(M&E) approved Evaluation Guidelines

www.pndpunjab.gov.pk/system/files/ADP%202014-15_0.pdf

https://www.punjab.gov.pk/social_welfare_and_bait_ul_Mall

https://swd.punjab.gov.pk/district_industrial_home

2.4

IDENTIFICATION OF KEY INDICATORS

Progress of planned objectives against achieved objectives

Financial assessment(Planned Vs. Actual) i.

Cost Analysis

ii.

ADP allocation vs. Actual Releases

iii.

Procurement and physical verification of procured items and Comparison of Estimated vs. Actual Cost

IV.

2.5

Project duration

Training Center Analysis

Certified Trainees Analysis

Production Centre Analysis

DIH (Sanatzar) Management Analysis

PROJECT SITE VISITS

The project site visit conducted by the Evaluation Team of the Directorate General, Monitoring & Evaluation, Planning & Development Department for data collection and evaluation purposes as depicted in below Table Table 4 Project Site Visits Sr. No.

LOCATION/ DISTRICT

DATE OF VISIT

1.

District Nankana

21-09-2017

2.

District Chiniot

22-09-2017

3.

DG SW & BMD

11-10-2017

TEAM MEMBERS

   

 

Mr. Faisal Aziz Mr. Ihsan Nadir Mr. Faisal Aziz Mr. Ihsan Nadir Mr. Faisal Aziz Mr. Ihsan Nadir

13 | P a g e


2.6 INTERVIEWS WITH PROJECT OFFICIALS The interviews and telephonic conversation were conducted with officials who were directly linked with this project. The detail of the officials belonging to sponsoring & executing agency is as follow. Table 5 Interview with Project Officials Sr. No.

NAME

DESIGNATION

CONTACT No.

1

Mr. Waheed Akhatar Ansari

Director General SW&BMD, Punjab, 042-99204148 Lahore

2

Mr. Muhammad Suleman

Director Planning & Evaluation

0321-9464597

3

Mr. Muhammad Ashraf Janjua

Statistical Officer – I

0333-3104666

4

Mr. Amjad Fakher

Evaluation Officer

0333-6145076

5

Ms. Khalida Rafique

Manager DIH (Sanatzar), Chiniot

0333-8381520

6

Mr. Shahid Waseer

Manager DIH (Sanatzar), Nankana

0300-5127100

2.7

PROJECT BENEFICIAIRES’ SURVEY

To take the feedback of the beneficiaires a survey was designed for the certified trainees of both the DIH. Population Proportion sampling technique used on Unit of Analysis/outcome in both DIH (Sanatzars). Unit of Analysis was “Certified Trainees.” Using simple population proportionate sampling technique , DG M&E team selected 15% (163) certified trainees out of total population size of 1,081 and interviewed during field visits of DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot & Nankana Sahib. Following table 6 describes the methodology of sample size collection. Table 6 Sample Size Collection

Sampling Technique

15% Population Proportion Sampling

Unit of Analysis

Certified Trainees

Population of DIH (Sanatzar) Nankana Sahib

624

Sample Size DIH (Sanatzar) Nankana Sahib

94

Population of DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot

457

Sample Size DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot

69 14 | P a g e


3 DG M&E A SSESSMENT

DG M&E A SSESSMENT

DG M&E Assessment has been carried out regarding planned objectives/interventions of the project and with reference to result based monitoring indicators & targeted impacts mentioned in as revised PC-1 3.1

PHYSICAL TARGETS & ACHIEVMENTS VS. DG M&E ASSESSMENT

DG M& E Assessment of Physical Targets is as under; Table 7 Physical Targets & Achievements vs DG M&E Assessment Physical Targets

Actual Achievements

DG M&E Assessment

Hiring of Suitable Building of Completed Sanatzars Purchase of furniture & fixture Completed

Achieved

Purchase of transport facility

Not Achieved

Purchase of machinery equipment Recruitment of staff

Start of Services

CM did not approve & Completed Partially Completed

Services has been started

Achieved

Achieved Partially Achieved 02 Posts of Managers are filled with Additional Charges 02 Post of Craft Designers are Vacant 03 Trade Instructors at DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot are vacant Partially Achieved Production Centres at both DIH (Sanatzar) yet to be established

15 | P a g e


3.2

FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT (PLANNED VS. ACTUAL)

Financial assessment of the project is carried out in the following parameters; I. Yearly Cost Breakdown II. ADP allocation vs. Actual Releases & Actual Expenditures III. Procurement and physical verification of procured 3.2.1

YEARLY COST BREAKDOWN

Yearly Cost Breakdown Analysis of the Planned & Actual Expenditures is as under; Table 8 Planned vs Actual Expenditures PLANNED EXPENDITURES (Millions)

YEAR

ACTUAL EXPENDITURE(Millions)

2014-15

Rs

13.000

Rs

11.460

2015-16

Rs

2.784

Rs

1.274

2016-17

Rs

16.034

Rs

11.105

Rs

31.818

Rs

23.839

18.000

Cost Analysis

16.034

16.000 14.000 12.000

13.000 11.460

11.105

10.000

8.000 6.000 4.000

2.784 1.274

2.000 0.000 2014-15

2015-16 PLANNED EXPENDITURES.

2016-17

ACTUAL EXPENDITURES.

Graph 2 Year wise Planned Vs. Actual Expenditures

16 | P a g e


3.2.2

ADP ALLOCATION VS. ACTUAL RELEASE

Year wise “ADP Allocation”, “Actual Release” analysis is as under: Table 9 ADP Allocation vs. Actual Release ADP ALLOCATION (Millions)

YEAR

ACTUAL RELEASES(Millions)

2014-15

Rs

13.000

Rs 13.000

2015-16

Rs

2.784

Rs 2.784

2016-17

Rs

16.034

Rs 16.034

Rs

31.818

Rs 31.818

Financial Phasing ADP ALLOCATION.

ACTUAL RELEASES. 16.034

13.000

16.034

13.000

2.784

2014-15

2.784

2015-16

2016-17

Graph 3 ADP Allocation vs Actual Release 3.3

PROJECT PROCUREMENT

Following is the brief of project procurements as verified by the DGM&E team during evaluation; 3.3.1

Procurement of Furniture & Fixture:

Table 10 Procurement of Furniture & Fixture

S.R.

Item

Quantity

PRICE per unit

(Amount in Rupees) Total amount Actual

FOR USE OF OFFICERS 1

Officer table

2

40,000

80,000

66,500 17 | P a g e


2 3

Officer chair Wooden Almirah

4 5

Visiting Chairs Side rack

2 2

15,000 20,000

30,000 40,000

29,300 77,000

10 2

7000 10,000

70,000 20,000

158,000 31,500

2,40,000

362,300

Sub total FOR USE OF STAFF 6 Office tables 7 8 9 10

Office chairs Computer table + chair Steel Almirah File rack

5

20,000

1,00,000

245,200

25 1+1 5 5

6,000 20,000 20,000 8,000

1,50,000 20,000 1,00,000 40,000

200,000 47,000 114,300 151,000

4,10,000

757,500

Sub total FOR CLASSES 11 12

Teacher’s table Teacher’s chair

5 5

20,000 6,000

1,00,000 30,000

243,500 107,500

13 14

White board Cutting table (big)

7 2

2,000 8,000

14,000 16,000

87,500 94,000

15

Stools

50

2,000

1,00,000

1,57,250

16 17

Class Room Chairs Steel almirahs

150 7

8,000 20,000

12,00,000 1,40,000

1,187,500 432,000

18

Computer table + chairs

15

20,000

3,00,000

750,000

19

Kitchen table (Big)

1

30,000

30,000

77,000

20 21

Kitchen cabinet Crockery

1 Lum sum

20,000 1,00,000

20,000 1,00,000

99,000 230,000

22

Parlour chair

3

30,000

90,000

128,000

Sub total Display Centre 23 24

Show cases Silver trunks

2 Lum sum

20,000

Sub total Grand Total

21,40,000

3,593,250

40,000 50,000

144,000 282,000

90,000

426,000

28,80,000

5,139,050

3.3.2 Procurement of Machinery & Equipment: Table 11 Procurement of Machinery & Equipment

S.R. Item FOR COMPUTER LAB 1 Computer with printer &UPS ( 4th generation model 4i5) 2 Air conditioner 3 Generator

Quantity

PRICE per unit

(Amount in Rupees) Total amount Actual

15

1,00,000

15,00,000

2,825,500

2(1.5 tons) 1 ( 5kv)

1,00,000 2,00,000

2,00,000 2,00,000

138,000 1,240,000 18 | P a g e


Sub total COOKING CLASS 4 Cooking range 5 Refrigerator 6 Oven Sub total DRESS MAKING CLASSES 7 Sewing Machine (manual without motor) (Singer/Seleka/Gold Seleka) 8 Electric motor 9 Computer Karai Machine 10 Over lock machine 11 Kaj Machine 12 Button Machine (Single thread ) 13 Single Lock Stich Industrial Machine 14 Aari Machine 15 Kroshia Pico / Kingri Pico 16 Ada work frame with stand 17 Electric motor 180w coper wind Sub total LANGUAGE CLASS 18 Multi Media with screen 19 Computer with printer &UPS ( 4th generation model 4i5) Sub total 20 Fire extinguisher equipment Sub total Grand total

3.4

19,00,000

4,203,500

1 1(15 cubic) 1

45,000 35,000 20,000

45,000 35,000 20,000 1,00,000

50,000 130,000 33,000 213,000

25

10,000

2,50,000

322,050

5 5 1 1 1

15,000 20,000 50,000 1,60,000 70,000

75,000 1,00,000 50,000 1,60,000 70,000

25,350 520,000 84,000 84,000 85,000

5

40,000

2,00,000

201,600

2 1 25 20

35,000 1,25,00 4,000 2,000

70,000 1,25,000 1,00,000 40,000

48,000 340,000 31,500 36,000

12,40,000

1,777,500

1,00,000 1,000

370,000 110,000

101,000 50,000 50,000 3,391,000

480,000 44,000 44,000 6,718,000

1 1

Lum sum

1,00,000 1,000

50,000

PROJECT DURATION

The project “Establishment of District Industrial Homes at Nankana Shib and Chiniot� was conceived in September 2014 with gestation period of two years to be completed till September 2016 with the total financial cost of 30.278 Million rupees. But latter on PC-I was revised and gestation period extended for another nine months till June 2017 with revised cost of 31.816 Million. 3.5

PROCESS ANALYSIS

The Project Process Analysis was carried out against the following factors; i.

Training Center Analysis

ii.

Trade Analysis 19 | P a g e


iii.

Certified Trainees Analysis

iv.

Production Center Analysis

v.

DIH Management Analysis

3.5.1

TRAINING CENTRE ANALYSIS

Current status of total enrolled and certified trainees of both DIH (Sanatzars); Table 12 Enrolled & Certified Trainees

District

Total No. of Enrolled Trainees

Total No. of Certified Trainees

Nankana Sahib

762

624

Chiniot

457

457

Enrolled Trainees.

Certified Trainees.

762 624 457

457

Chiniot

Nankana Sahib

Graph 4 Enrolled vs. Certified Trainees

Status of certified trainees till June 30, 2017 clearly indicates that in DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot all trainees who were enrolled completed their course and received certificates whereas in Nankana Sahib 624 trainees completed their course out of a total of 762 enrolled students. While during field visit it was observed that there were only two paid instructors. It shows serious gaps in enrollment and certification process.

20 | P a g e


3.5.1.1

TRAINING/TRADES WISE TRAINEES OF DIH (SANATZAR) NANKANA SAHIB;

Current status of Training/Trades wise Trainees of DIH (Sanatzars) Nankana Sahib is depicted in Table 13 below; Table 13 Training/Trade wise Status, Nankana Sahib

Training/Trades

Enrolled Trainees.

Certified Trainees.

Ada Work

77

57

Computer courses

169

131

Dress making

201

170

Fine arts

115

96

Personal grooming & Parlor work

200

170

Grand Total

762

624

Enrolled Trainess.

Certified Trainees.

201

200 170

169 131 77

170 115

96

57

Ada Work

Computer courses

Dress making

Fine arts

Personal grooming & Parlor work

Graph 5 Training vs. Trade wise status, Nankana Sahib 3.5.1.2

TRAINING/TRADE WISE TRAINEES OF DIH (SANATZAR) CHINIOT

Current status of Training/Trade wise Trainees of DIH (Sanatzars) Chiniot is mentioned in table 12 below; Table 14 Training/Trade wise Status, Chiniot Training/Trades

Enrolled Trainees.

Certified Trainees.

Computer courses

70

70

Cooking

10

10

Fine arts

10

10

Hand & machine embroidery

114

114

21 | P a g e


Industrial stitching, cutting & sewing

174

174

Personal grooming & Parlor work

79

79

Grand Total

457

457

Enrolled Trainess.

Certified Trainees.

Registered Trainess. 174 174

114 114 70

79

70

10 Computer courses

10

Cooking

10

79

10

Fine arts

Hand & machine Industrial stiching, Personal grooming embroidery cutting & sewing & Parlor work

Graph 6 Training vs. Trade wise status, Chiniot

3.5.2

CERTIFIED TRAINEES ANALYSIS

A survey was designed to assess the trainees’ view about the training and institutions. For this purpose a sample of 15% of the certified trainees was taken and a semi-structured interview tool was designed to execute the survey. From District Nankana Sahib out of a total of 624 certified trainees a sample of 94 trainees was taken for survey whereas from District Chinot out of a total of 457 trainees the sample of 69 was taken for survey. Hence a total of 163 beneficiaires were selected randomly for survey. Following are the findings of the survey. 3.5.2.1

HOW DID YOU COME TO KNOW ABOUT SANATZAR?

A total of 98 beneficiaries (60.12 %) responded that they came to know about District Industrial Home (Sanatzar) through her friend or neighbor (word of mouth). And only 36 beneficiaries (22.09%) were reached out through advertisement efforts made by management of DIH (Sanatzar). It is clear from the fact that the advertisement was not effective in accessing the beneficiaires which needs to be looked into by the department.

22 | P a g e


Advertisement.

Word of Mouth.

Officials

Others.

98

36

17

12

How did you come to know about Sanatzar?

Graph 7 Advertisement of DIH (Sanatzar) Services 3.5.2.2

WHY DID YOU DECIDE TO JOIN THE SANATZAR?

The next question was regarding their motivation to join the DIH (Sanatzar). In response to it 100 beneficiaires (61.34%) said that they joined the DIH to income generation through better employment opportunities. Whereas, 58 respondents (35.5%) said that they learned the skill for their skill development. Hence the project beneficiaires’ perspective to join the project looks like gaining the employment opportunities and learning skills for their livelihood.

Why did you join the Sanatzar 120 100

100 80 60 58

40 20

5 0 Income Generation & Employment

Skill Development

Other

Graph 8 Why did you join the Sanatzar

23 | P a g e


3.5.2.3

HOW DID YOU SELECT THE TRAINING COURSE/TRADE AT SANATZAR?

About one third of the respondents i.e. 53 (32.52 %) responded that they selected courses at DIH (Sanatzar) from the offered courses (course calendar), 49 beneficiaries (30.06 %) responded that they joined the course due to personal interest. As low number of beneficiaires as 29 (17.79 %) responded that they selected course as per market need. There emerges need for the revision of course calendar and inclusion of market based courses for the trainees. Course Calendar.

Employer requirement.

Market Need.

Personal Interest.

Others.

53 49

29 19 13

How did you select the training course/trade at sanatzar?

Graph 9 Process of Course Selection at DIH (Sanatzar) 3.4.2.4 WHAT WAS YOUR QUALIFICATION LEVEL WHEN YOU JOINED TRAINING COURSE/TRADE?

As many as 64 beneficiaries (39.26 %) responded that they had passed their Elementary Grade when joined at DIH (Sanatzar), 51 beneficiaries (31.29 %) responded that they had completed Primary Grade. 32 beneficiaries (19.63 %) responded that had passed their SSC exams. Primary.

Middle.

Matriculation.

Intermediate.

Others.

64 51 32

11 5 What was your qualification level when you joined training course/trade?

Graph 10 Qualification level of Trainees at DIH (Sanatzar) 24 | P a g e


3.4.2.5

WHY DID YOU SELECT SANATZAR FOR LEARNING YOUR TRAINING COURSE/TRADE?

A total of 71 beneficiaries (43.56 %) responded that they selected courses at DIH (Sanatzar) because of “No Fee”, 36 beneficiaries (22.09 %) responded that due to “Quality of Training course/Trade facilities. 29 beneficiaries (17.79 %) responded that due to availability of “Qualified Trainer” while 24 (14.7%) responded that they joined the DIH for the certification. It shows that free technical education is the key source of motivation for the students whereas quality of training, good trainers and certifications also encourage them to join DIH. Qualified Trainer.

Quality of Training/Trade Facilities.

NO Fee.

Certification.

Others.

71

36 29

24 3

Why did you select sanatzar for learning your training course/trade?

Graph 11 Reason to select DIH (Sanatzar) 3.4.2.6

HOW DO YOU DESCRIBE THE QUALITY OF TRAINING/TRADE PROVIDED?

A total of 63 beneficiaries (38.65 %) responded the quality of training/trade provided at DIH (Sanatzar) very “Very Good”, 41 beneficiaries (25.15 %) responded “Good”. 29 beneficiaries (17.79 %) responded as “Neutral”. As many as 30 (18.4%) responded it poor or very poor. Overall the assessment shows that majority of the respondents were satisfied with the quality of training. Very Good.

Good.

Neutral.

Poor.

Very Poor.

63

41

29 22 8

How do you describe the quality of training/trade provided?

Graph 12 Quality of Training/Trade at DIH (Sanatzar) 25 | P a g e


3.5.2.7

WHAT IS YOUR CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS AFTER TRAINING?

A total of 64 beneficiaries (39.26 %) responded that they are “Employed” after getting certified from the DIH (Sanatzar) whereas 99 beneficiaries (60.7%) responded “un-employed”. But not even a single certified trainee got registered with “Work & Earn Centre” at DIH (Sanatzar). The management of the DIH should take measures to make the Work & Earn Centers functional.

Employment Status of the Trainees

150

105

100 39 50 0 Polite

Neutral

Graph 13 Employment Status 3.4.2.8

WHAT IS YOUR MONTHLY INCOME AFTER GETTING THIS TRAINING?

49 beneficiaries (30.06 %) responded that they are earning “Above Rs. 5,000”, while 73 beneficiaries (44.79 %) responded that they are earning “Rs. 5,000”. 41 beneficiaries (25.15 %) responded that earning below “Rs. 5,000”. It shows an income generation impact of the training. Below Rs. 5,000.

Rs. 5,000.

Above Rs. 5,000.

73

49 41

What is your monthly income after getting this training?

Graph 14 Income after getting Training

26 | P a g e


3.5.2.9

HAS TRAINING FROM SANATZAR INTERVENTION IMPACTED AND EMPOWERED YOU SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY?

A total of 64 beneficiaries (39.26 %) responded that they feel socially and economically empowered as an impact of this training, whereas, 47 beneficiaries (28.83 %) responded as neutral and 52 (31.9%) said that their status has not been improved. YES.

Neutral.

NO.

64 52

47

Has training from sanatzar intervention impacted and empowered you socially and economically?

Graph 15 Socio-Economic Empowerment

3.4.3

PRODUCTION CENTRE ANALYSIS

Production Centres are important component of DIH (Sanatzars). In order to achieve the objective of social-economic empowerment both training & production Centres are to work systematically If production Centres are not working it clearly indicates no work orders are being collected by marketing team through its exhibitions and promotional activities. Both DIH (Sanatzars) have stated to provide trainings but not any certified trainee could be registered at Production Centres or through work orders after completing course because Marketing team could not get Work Orders for engaging them. Table 15 Certified Trainees & Registered Trainees at Production (Work & Earn) Centers

Description

Chiniot

Nankana Sahib

Grand Total

Certified Trainees.

457

624

1081

Registered Trainees.

0

0

0

27 | P a g e


700

624

600 457

500 400 300 200 100

0

0

0 Certified Trainees.

Registered Trainess.

Chiniot

Nankana Sahib

Graph 16 Certified & Registered Trainees

3.5.4

DIH (SANATZAR) MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS

Certified Trainees were interviewed and asking about the quality of Instructors, Staff and Management 3.5.4.1 WHAT IS YOUR OBSERVATION ABOUT THE ATTITUDE OF THE INSTRUCTOR?

About 2/3rd of the respondents i.e. 105 (64.4%) said that they found their trainers Polite whereas 39 (23.93%) remained neutral to this question and 19 (11.6%) said that the attitude of the trainers was rude. It shows an overwhelming good attitude of the DIH management towards the trainees.

Attitude of the Trainers 120

105

100 80 60

39

40

19

20 0

Polite

Neutral

Rude

Graph 17 Attitude of the Instructor at DIH (Sanatzar)

28 | P a g e


3.5.4.2 ARE YOU SATISFIED FROM THE INTERVENTION OF SANATZAR?

A total of 78 beneficiaries (47.85 %) responded that they are “Satisfied” from the intervention of DIH (Sanatzar). 71 beneficiaries (43.56 %) did not respond and remained “Neutral”. Only 14 beneficiaries (08.59 %) responded “NO”. YES. 78

Neutral.

NO.

71

14

Are you satisfied from the intervention of sanatzar?

Graph 18 Satisfaction with the Intervention

29 | P a g e


4

O BSERVATIONS 1. A suitable land was to be identified by the management of DIH for the construction of building of DIH (Sanatzar) but DG M&E team observed that it has not been identified. 2. It was observed and noted that installed security cameras are functional at DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot building only. 3. Although machinery and equipment for training/trades have been purchased yet it is not in accordance with the number of enrolled trainees 4. Mobility facility to the staff is not provided as CM did not approve the purchase of vehicles but drivers have been recruited and salaries are being paid 5. DG M&E team seriously observed that key positions of Managers (BPS 18) are filled with additional charge and that of Craft Designer (BPS 17) are vacant. While only two out of five Trade Instructors have been hired in DIH Chiniot. 6. DG M&E team found that no local art and craft has been identified at DIH Nankana Sahib 7. It was very difficult to verify, authenticate enrollment and certification process, records at both training centers of DIH (Sanatzars). 8. It is observed that no certified trainee has been registered with DIH (Sanatzar) at production (work & earn) centers for work orders. 9. DG M&E team observed that neither Course Calendar had been developed nor being followed and revised on regular basis for the trainees. 10. It is observed that no exhibition or display centers have been established to showcase finished products at both DIH (Sanatzars). 11. Managers, market organizers established no linkages to strengthen liaison and coordination with other organizations and institutions like SMEDA, TDAP, EPB, and Chambers of Commerce at district levels. 12. It is observed that DIH (Sanatzars) management had not developed and implemented any standard operating procedures (SOPs) for strengthening institutional capacities.

30 | P a g e


5

R ECOMMENDATIONS 1. It is recommended to identify suitable lands and ear mark it for construction of building of Sanatzars at Chiniot & Nankana Sahib 2. It is recommend to install security cameras and get tagging of buildings of DIH (Sanatzar) 3. It is recommend to procure adequate machinery & equipment as per need of trainees 4. Provision of Mobility facility should be ensured at both DIH (Sanatzars) subject to approval of the authorities otherwise there is no need to hire drivers when there is no vehicle. 5. Recruitment process should be completed immediately in both districts for improvement in service delivery and sustainable socio-economic development of young women and girls. 6. It is recommended to conduct baseline survey/market research in both districts to identify and develop local arts & crafts 7. It is strongly recommended that database should be developed and maintained for enrollment, certification and registration process of trainees in training centers at DIH (Sanatzar) 8. It is strongly recommended that Management Information System (MIS) should be developed and implemented for smooth functioning of DIH (Sanatzar) in production centers at DIH (Sanatzar) 9. It is recommended to develop and follow course calendar as per need assessment of trainees 10. Display centers should be established at exhibitions extensively to showcase finished products at both DIH (Sanatzars). 11. It is recommended to establish and strengthen linkages with other organizations and institutions like SMEDA, TDAP, EPB, and Chambers of Commerce at district levels 12. It is strongly recommended that DG SW&BMD, managers DIH (Sanatzar) and advisory body should develop and implement standard operating procedures (SOPs) for strengthening institutional capacity. 13. Financial management system and reporting standards should be improved with mutual

consultation of finance department and AG Office both in PC-I & PC-IV.

31 | P a g e


A NNEXURE – A

A DVISORY B ODY – C HINIOT & N ANKANA S AHIB

Advisory Body - District Chiniot

32 | P a g e


Advisory Body - District Nankana Sahib

33 | P a g e


A NNEXURE – B B UILDINGS OF DIH(S ANATZAR )

34 | P a g e


A NNEXURE –C S CHEDULE OF N EW E XPENDITURES (SNE)

FOR

P ROJECT S TAFF

Schedule of New Expenditure (SNE) for project staff DIH (Sanatzar) Chiniot

Sr.

Position

BPS

Part/full Time

No. of Posts

Current Status of Posts

SNE of Project Staff

1 Additional

Recommended

1

Manager

18

Full time

1

2

Craft Designer

17

Full time

1

1 Vacant

Recommended

3

Assistant

16

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

4

Market Organizer

11

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

5

Junior Clerk

11

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

6

Store Keeper

05

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

1 Filled

Recommended

7

Driver

04

Full time

1

Charge

*No Purchase of Transport Facility

8

Peon

01

Full time

2

2 Filled

Recommended

9

Sweeper

01

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

10

Chowkidar

01

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

35 | P a g e


DIH (Sanatzar) Nankana Sahib

Sr.

Position

BPS

Part/full

No. of

Time

Posts

Current

SNE of Project

Status of

Staff

Posts

1 Additional

Recommended

1

Manager

18

Full time

1

2

Craft Designer

17

Full time

1

1 Vacant

Recommended

3

Assistant

16

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

4

Market Organizer

11

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

5

Junior Clerk

11

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

6

Store Keeper

05

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

1 Filled

Recommended

7

Driver

04

Full time

1

Charge

*No Purchase of Transport Facility

8

Peon

01

Full time

2

2 Filled

Recommended

9

Sweeper

01

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

10

Chowkidar

01

Full time

1

1 Filled

Recommended

36 | P a g e


Š Directorate General of Monitoring and Evaluation, Planning and Development Department, Govt. of Punjab (December, 2017)

Soft form of the report and corresponding MOM may be downloaded from www.dgmepunjab.gov.pk 37 | P a g e


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.