I N D I A N A D A I LY S T U D E N T | T H U R S D AY, F E B . 2 6 , 2 0 1 5 | I D S N E W S . C O M
State talks to public about I-69
IDS
By Daniel Metz dsmetz@indiana.edu | @DanielSMetz
RACHEL MEERT | IDS
Sophomore forward Troy Williams looks to pass to a teammate during the game against Northwestern on Wednesday at Welsh-Ryan Arena. Williams had 21 points and 14 rebounds.
72-65
Missed opportunity IU’s offense goes cold in second half
Hoosiers unable to sustain shooting
Is IU a bubble team? Page 5 The Hoosiers’ tournament chances are fading, says columnist Casey Krajewski.
By Alden Woods aldwoods@indiana.edu | @acw9293
EVANSTON, Ill. — Rest doesn’t come often in the Big Ten, no matter how much it’s needed. Each team plays 18 games spread across the Midwest and New England packed into just under 10 weeks. Add in the strength of the conference and the importance of each game in the final season standings, and playing in the Big Ten is exhausting. That much was evident in IU’s 72-65 loss to Northwestern
on Wednesday. It was the Hoosiers’ seventh game in February, and the fatigue looked like it had taken effect. IU Coach Tom Crean said in a pre-game press conference that he didn’t think the Hoosiers needed rest, but their play Wednesday indicated otherwise. IU’s offense — normally one thought, one pass ahead of SEE OFFENSE, PAGE 6
By Sam Beishuizen sbeishui@indiana.edu | @Sam_Beishuizen
EVANSTON, Ill. — Something was bound to break. It ended up being the IU offense. The Hoosiers’ offense shot 64.3 percent from 3-point range in the first half. The defense allowed Northwestern to shoot 51.7 percent from the field. One had to give. IU’s offense ended up bowing out. IU (19-10, 9-7) shot just 29 percent in the second half while Northwestern (14-14, 5-10) continued to shoot at a 51 percent clip for the game. IU sunk as the shots stopped
falling. The Wildcats defeated the Hoosiers 72-65 to win a fourth-consecutive Big Ten game for the first time since 1967. “Our team has been resilient all year,” IU Coach Tom Crean said. “I love how they continue to grow up. The one thing that we have got to learn is when the shots aren’t falling, you define how good of a team you’re going to be when it’s not there.” Without warning, IU’s offense evaporated in the second half after an efficient opening period. SEE HOOSIERS, PAGE 6
IU had its worst game from the free throw line in Big Ten play Wednesday
SEE I-69, PAGE 3
I-69 timeline 1991 Congress proposed a “New National Highway System” and the dream took root as part of a new I-69 corridor. 1999 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Study was initiated for the Evansville to Indianapolis portion of I-69. 2003 Final Environmental Impact Statement was issued for I-69. 2004 The route that aligned with State Road 37 was chosen for Tier 2 of I-69.
80 70 60 50 40
44%
30 20
2012 Peak of I-69 construction. The longest contiguous new terrain interstate construction project in the U.S. 2014 Construction on Section 5 began.
10 0 Dec. 31 Jan. 5 Nebraska Michigan State
More than 200 attendees tasked the Indiana Department of Transportation with some difficult issues Wednesday, from annexed land to financial concerns. “I can you ask you guys the same questions and get three or four different answers,” a man said to INDOT representatives at the public forum in the Martinsville High School auditorium. This particular Interstate 69 project, Section 6, will stretch from Indianapolis to Martinsville and is only one part of a state initiative to connect Indianapolis and Evansville. Indiana’s project is only one part of a federal highway infrastructure program to extend I-69 from Mexico to Canada. The construction of Section 6 is being administered by INDOT, the Federal Highway Association and a private consultant group. The goals of the project include improving the transportation between southwest Indiana and Indianapolis, to alleviate some traffic congestion and support economic growth throughout Indiana. Currently, an Environmental Impact Statement is being drafted that will investigate a number of environmental considerations including wetland identification, stream assessments, endangered species surveys, historic and archaeological resources evaluation and noise analysis. The EIS is expected to be finished by the first quarter of 2017. INDOT recognizes these concerns and plans to address them, said William Wingfield, a spokesperson for the Indiana Department of Transportation. “How can we address traffic?” Wingfield said. “How can we minimize cost? How can we deal
Jan. 10 Ohio State
Jan. 13 Penn State
Jan. 18 Illinois
Jan. 22 Maryland
Jan. 25 Ohio State
Jan. 28 Purdue
SOURCE KENPOM.COM
Jan. 31 Feb. 3 Feb. 8 Feb. 11 Feb. 15 Feb. 19 Rutgers Wisconsin Michigan Maryland Minnesota Purdue
Feb. 22 Feb. 25 Rutgers Northwestern
GRAPHIC BY ANNA BOONE AND EVAN HOOPFER | IDS
2015 Section 4 will open. 2018 Construction on Section 6 is expected to begin. SOURCE INDOT
Focus group discusses relationship between alcohol, sexual assault By Lindsay Moore liramoor@indiana.edu | @_lindsaymoore
Adding alcohol to the equation of sexual assault and consent often leaves students in a gray area. Students on the Sexual Assault Task Force and other student organizations met at the Dean of Students’ office last night to discuss the relationship between alcohol and sexual assault on campus. The focus group was led by Devon Malick, an intern of Culture of Care, Dean of Students office and the drug and alcohol information center, OASIS. Malick will be working to pilot a curriculum based around sexual assault prevention. The focus group was shown the New Zealand-based video “Who Are You?” which focused on bystander intervention. The video featured a night out for two friends that began with a pregame at a friend’s house and progressed to a bar scene. Throughout the video, different bystanders were identified: the friend, the stranger, the bartender and the roommate. As the video progressed, no bystanders intervened. At the end, the night was set in reverse to show
“I feel like we focus a lot on bystander intervention, whereas if we just learn to respect each other’s bodily anatomy I feel like a lot of these situations can be avoided.”
ADAM DEVINE
PERFOMS AT
IU AUDITORIUM
Carmen Vernon, sophomore
what each bystander could have done preventatively. The future curriculum would be based off a video similar to “Who Are You?” set at IU. The focus group was asked for suggestions on how to make this video relatable to IU students. Students suggested adding a variety of scenes of where sexual assault could happen including dorms, house parties, fraternities and bars. Sophomore Carmen Vernon, Feminist Student Association treasurer, suggested that switching the focus from bystanders to the perpetrator would be effective in changing the culture of sexual assault. “I’d like more emphasis to be put on perpetrators, whether they’re SEE ASSAULT, PAGE 6
PAGE 9 JAMES BENEDICT | IDS