Argumentative Essay Topics Death Penalty by I Need Help Writing A Paper Singapore

The Death Penalty In The American Justice System

Argument Essay: Death Penalty

The American Justice System has been using the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, as a way to serve a prisoner's sentence usually due to the crime of murder. The death penalty in the American Justice System has been used for many years now. Although in 18 states the death penalty has already been abolished, there are still 32 states where it is still legal. The death penalty should not be legal in the American Justice System, because it is immoral, unjust, and ineffective. When something is immoral it usually means that it is unacceptable in our social or ethical principles. Not only do we go against murder, but also there are some people who say this and are for the death penalty and want the...show more content... A capital punishment is something that cannot be undone and is irreversible.

Fig. 1. Innocent people released from death row.

In the case of Cameron Todd Willingham we are able to see how unfair and unjust Cameron was executed for murders he did not commit. The case of Cameron had many questionable evidence that was not investigated further and because of these mistake, Cameron Willingham was sentenced with the death penalty and executed. The death penalty is also lacks proper justice because it denies prisoners rehab. Many of the crimes committed were due to the influence of drugs and alcohol. According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD), 50% of jail and prison inmates are clinically addicted to either drugs, alcohol, or even both. This study shows that since they are clinically addicted it could also mean that they could have been using the substance while committing the crime. We should not be putting people on the death penalty if they were unable to make rational decisions due to their addiction to drugs or alcohol. Mentally ill people are also affected with the death penalty and there are cases where a person was executed and had a mental disability. It is wrong to sentence someone to the capital punishment knowing that they were unable to make correct decisions due to their state of health. We should be able to provide the help

Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty

Cruelty of Death Penalty There are many controversial topics in this country's politics and criminal justice system. These topics range from mass incarceration to racial profiling to three strikes and to the death penalty. The death penalty for many years has been a topic in which many cannot come to a consensus on, both in the state and the federal level. Although both sides to the death penalty argument have legitimate reasons, it is now seen that the death penalty is becoming less and less famous. It seems as if despite its vengeance for blood thirsty people, the death penalty has no positive effect. Death penalty should be abolished because it puts innocent lives in danger, it is expensive, and life without parole is better. The death penalty puts innocent lives in danger. Rarely, innocent people have been put on the death row for a homicide. Studies show that as of October 2015, the U.S. have executed over 1,414 individuals since 1976. 156 individuals have been exonerated from death row that is, found to be innocent and released – since 1973 (Innocence Database). In other words, 1.1 in 10 prisoners in the death row are innocent. Some of them get reimbursed by suing the state government for putting their lives in danger, for wasting their time, and disrupt their families. Then again, if these people were executed before appeal, it is irreversible, and there is no way to reimburse their lives. For example, Carlos De Luna, a man found near a crime scene where a gas

Get more content

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay

The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the execution of an offender that is sentenced to death by a court of law for a criminal offense. This type of punishment for inmates is involved in controversy over whether or not it is an acceptable form of punishment for criminals and also whether or not it is immoral. There are many arguments for both sides of the debate, each making valid points and pointing out the flaws of the opposing position. Many religions are either for or against capital punishment, due to them either being against killing or for it. The controversy surrounding the death penalty laws in the United States is made up of various arguments. Other arguments surrounding the use of the death penalty include whether...show more content...

The constitution guarantees the due process of law and equal protection under the law. Supporters of the death penalty also believe that it is an intolerable act of denial of civil liberties and that it is not consistent with the values that are upheld by our democratic system. Those that support capitol punishment claim that it has an effect on potentially violent criminals where as the threat of imprisonment for life is not sufficient, while those against capitol punishment have shown research that has stated that it is not more effect at deterring criminal motives then a life–long prison sentence. The people who support capital punishment believe that it is possible to only have the people that are truly deserving of the death are executed by having laws and procedures fashioned in that way. They state that the capital punishment in the United States argue that the death penalty is a very humane way of punishing those who have taken another life and are brutal killers. Those who support it believes that it a constitutional way of punishing the criminals and deterring violent crimes. The United States is the only English–speaking Western democracy in which the death penalty is still in use. Capitol Punishment was reinstated by the U.S. Supreme Court after a four–year moratorium in 1976. Religion also plays a role in the case of the death penalty. The American Get more content

A man who spent nearly 25 years on death row for the kidnapping, rape and murder of a 15–year–old girl has been executed in Missouri. Roderick Nunley, 50, had admitted his guilt in court and on Tuesday Missouri Governor Jay Nixon denied a clemency request– filed by opponents of the death penalty – which argued that a plea DEAL had been refused because of racial bias. In March 1989, Ann Harrison DISAPPEARED in Kansas City while waiting for a school bus on her driveway. Nunley and Michael Taylor made a spur–of–the–moment decision to abduct her after driving by in a stolen CAR. Ann's body was found in the boot of the abandoned car three days later. Both men were sentenced to death in 1991. Taylor was executed last year. Chris Koster, Missouri...show more content...

Nunley and Taylor were both black, while their victim was white. The US Supreme Court DENIED several appeals by lawyers representing Nunley, including one which stated that the death penalty amounted to cruel and unusual punishment. Pete Edlund, a RETIRED Kansas City detective, told Associated Press news agency: "They just take forever to do the deed. "The delay in executing these two is just nuts because it didn't have anything to do with their guilt. It was legal mumbo jumbo nonsense." ACCORDINGto prosecutors, Nunley and Taylor had taken cocaine when they stole a CAR on 22 March, 1989. At one point, a police officer had chased the car from Lee Summit, but was called off after it crossed into Kansas City. They kidnapped Ann and took her to Nunley's mother's home, where they raped her and then stabbed her repeatedly in the stomach and neck. Nunley and Taylor were arrested after a man in jail for a robbery turned them in. Some of Ann's hair was found in carpet at the home where they attacked

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay

Get

Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty

Olivier Benoit Professor Marlene Lang

English 101

6 November 2017

The death penalty is a heavily debated topic and will be for many years to come. One of the debated topics of capital punishment is whether it actually deters crimes effectively and is better than life in prison with no chance at parole. Some studies had shown that the death penalty actually saves between three and 18 lives when each convicted killer is executed.(Tanner, 2007) Naci Mocan, an economics professor, proves the studies by re–examining data from a previous study. Through re–examining the data, Mocat finds that "each execution results in five fewer homicides, and commuting a death sentence means five more homicides."(Tanner, 2007) This means that by executing the life of a convicted killer, five lives could potentially be saved. Roy Adler and Michael Summers published a study on this subject. The authors examined U.S. homicides and executions from 1979 to 2004, and observed that the homicides decreased while executions increased (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). The Emory studies had also established that the capital punishment reduces the number of murders. The first study from the Emory group had concluded that each execution leads to eighteen fewer murders (Tanner, 2007). The second study used monthlymurder and execution data from 1977 to 1999 and concluded that each death sentence led to 4.5 fewer murders and each execution resulted in three fewer murders (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). Through this study, it was found that executions had the greatest effect on murders of passion and those between friends and families, compared to murders between strangers. It was also found that shorter stays on death row led to one fewer murder for every 2.75 fewer years that a convict remains on death row before execution (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). The third study states that "91% of the states had higher homicide rates after they suspended the death penalty. Conversely, 70% of the states saw homicides decrease after the death penalty was reinstated" (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). The final study had found that "In the states that executed fewer than nine prisoners, there was either no deterrent effect or else the homicide rate actually

Death Penalty

Get more content

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty

My initial thoughts on the death penalty were that no matter how much the death penalty deters crime, it is still a cruel punishment. I always assumed that the death penalty violated our eighth amendment, so why in this day and age is it still deemed as a penalty for a crime? It is widely known that the use of the death penalty is an extremely serious and permanent punishment. However, the government had already found its way to justify it by creating the fifth amendment which allows someone to be executed as long as there is due process of law. The bill of rights was written centuries ago in a time when execution was deemed necessary for a majority of crimes. The death penalty, also commonly referred to ascapital punishment, can be sentenced to anyone that has been convicted of murder or a capital crime. In the eighteenth century, more than two hundred crimes were deemed punishable by death because everyone had this idea of retribution but to the worst extent. Currently there are nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty in the United States; while execution still remains an option for thirty–one states. In the United States, it is acknowledged that the system is flawed and sometimes unjust resulting in many states abolishing the death penalty. Why do the remaining states want to keep the punishment around?

Before I completely sided with one viewpoint of this argument I wanted to do some research. After searching for articles on Opposing Viewpoints that Get more content

Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty

Write an argumentative essay in which you convince an audience to support your claim about a debatable idea. Use your research and experience to support your argument.

Psst, copy and paste your CBA here. Look at the checklist on pg. 156 in your SpringBoard to help you out.

The Death Penalty is very debatable I however am against it because of its cost to America and undeserving families I'm also against it because of how people think it deters murder when it does not.The last part of the fifth amendment states that "No person shall be held for capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,Nor be deprived of life liberty or property." meaning that no matter what we do our government should not decide when our life is being taken away. Innocent people sit in jail on death row for most of their lives just to find out that it was a mistake, what happens when the wrong person get killed will the government have the same consequences for killing an innocent person?

The death penalty is not good for the non deterrence. People will always cover up the death penalty by saying it is stopping people from committing crimes obviously it isn't. Wouldn't you think that if it really did deter crime people would eventually stop committing the crime. In my opinion if the death penalty isn't going to deter crime then why should we have it. It's not going to make a difference on whether people kill or not. In Other words if you are a killer

Get more content

The death Penalty is a very controversial topic to many. Some believe that the death penalty should not only be in place but there should be more executions every year. While others believe that the death penalty is going out of style and it is not serving its purpose of deterring crime as it did before. Although there are many claims supporting both sides still over half of Americans are forcapital punishment in some way, but what causes someone to be sentenced to death? According to the article "Against the American System of Capital Punishment" by Jack Greenberg the worst crime is, "a putative killer of one's parent or child" (Greenberg). What makes this the worst crime? And out of the few executions are these the only people getting...show more content...

According to this article "How the Death Penalty Saves Lives" by David B, Muhlhausen the death death penalty is more widely agreed upon that it should be in place than it shouldn't. The author makes the argument that with the death penalty in place it deters the crimes that have this punishment from happening. He also argues about how the constitution plays a role but how it supports it. He claims that it uphold constitutional protections such as due process and equal protection of law. Muhlhausen believes the death penalty should be in place simply because there are more Americans for it than against it. He believes that this should be in place because it is what America wants and the constitution supports it through the constitutional protections of due process, and equal protection of law.Muhlhausen has many main points similar to Greenberg but Muhlhausen doesn't have as much evidence or support to back up all of his arguments. He has some strong points but it could be supported better. Between Jack Greenberg's, "Against the American System of Capital Punishment" and David B. Muhlhausen, "How the Death Penalty Saves Lives" the points they are arguing tend to be fairly similar. They both argue whether the death penalty is a good or bad deter for the "worst crime," which is claimed to be killing that person's parents or children. Another similar point they have

Get more content

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty

Life is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent. For this reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment. Thus arises one of the great moral dilemmas of our time. Should taking the life of one who has taken the life of others be considered an available punishment? Is a murderer's life any less sacred than the victim's is? Can capital punishment, the death penalty, execution, legal murder, or whatever a societywishes to call it, be morally justifiable? The underlying question in this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted. In this...show more content... Today our society is assaulted with a barrage of violent images, whether fictional or not. People no longer think twice when they see a character die in a movie or a bullet riddled high–schooler jump out of a second story window. The concept of human life has completely lost its meaning. Capital punishment contributes to this problem. A convict is not thought of as a person. All humanity associated with them is removed. This rationalization is required in order have a society where capital punishment is legal. If a society removes humanity from convicts, characters in movies, or people on the 6 o'clock news it will begin to remove humanity from people encountered in every day life.

With time violence may become such a commonplace that even seemingly sane people will see no problem murdering a store clerk, opening fire on someone that cut them off on the highway, or killing a disobedient child. "A society that chooses violent death as a solution to a social problem gives official sanction to a climate of violence." (Prejean, 57)

The next argument supporting the immorality of capital punishment is that the reality of it is hidden. The majority of Americans support the death penalty, yet a very small minority of them has actually witnessed an execution. Also, very few Americans have known an executed criminal.

These two facts contribute to the entire rationalization process. No matter how anyone looks at it, no one can deny the fact

Argument Against the Death Penalty Essay

Argument Against the Death Penalty

Get more content

Death Penalty First and foremost, the death penalty is defined as the punishment of execution, administered to someone who has committed a terrible crime (Capital Punishment 1). This is also known as capital punishment, which is known for disregarding the human rights. Although many countries continue to enforce the death penalty, some countries think it should not be practiced. According to the United States, the death penalty continues to be a charged and controversial political and legal issue(Capital Punishment 1). In addition to, the death penalty also focuses on if the death penalty is fair not unfair; let alone, if the criminal will receive the right justice and punishment for the crime he has brought onto himself. The death...show more content...

Adding to the chorus of those who raise questions about fairness are those who argue that the death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment for those who are severely ill or mentally impaired (Preface to "Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?" 1). The outcome of this is to find another way to find out if the death penalty is given to the right individual who has committed the crime. There was a research done that would allow the person who committed the crime to take a DNA test; however, this could fairly help find a way to persecute the victim. The way that "advance technology" is set up today "it is now possible to establish the presence of an individual at the scene of the crime" (Preface to "Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?" 1). As a result, to some disagree that the DNA testing assist the fairness and justice of the death penalty. The death penalty is a major issue that brings up a lot of arguments in this society. The most important question is should the death penalty be abolished or not. I think the death penalty is the ultimate contradiction for human rights. It is cruel, barbaric, and a disgraceful punishment that can be given to humans. According to most people "it is a affront to human dignity" which produces an ongoing cycle of violence that can determine the human life (Capital Punishment Should be Abolished). However, many individuals believe that no matter a Get more content

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty

The death penalty is a controversial topic that most people believe to be a good thing.I am against the death penalty, not only is it a waste of taxpayers money, a crime, and a sin, it also could be considered cruel and unusual punishment. How would you feel if the person you love was sentenced to the death penalty? Your viewpoint of the death penalty may certainly change considering it's a love one's life at stake. Would your feelings about the death penalty change? An excessive amount of money is involved in the death penalty. "An Urban Institute study of Maryland's experience with the death penalty found that a single death–penalty trial cost $1.9 million more than a non–death–penalty trial. Since 1978, the cost to taxpayers for the five executions the state carried out was $37.2 million dollars – each." "The Cost of the Death Penalty." The Cost of Death Penalty, 9 Dec. 2011, deathpenaltyfacts.wordpress.com/the–cost–of–the–death–penalty–3/. Why spend extreme amounts of money only to end another's life? "In California, the current system costs $137 million per year; it would cost $11.5 million for a system without the death penalty.""Death Penalty Cost

Amnesty International USA." Amnesty International USA, www.amnestyusa.org/issues/death–penalty/death–penalty–facts/death–penalty–cost/. I understand the want to give victims families justice, but in reality, justice isn't served. Consider thecrime one committed was murder, the person who has committed that crime also has to lose their life, doesn't that mean there are now two murders? Now the person in charge of these executions is just as wrong as the person who committed the crime. Two wrongs don't make a situation right. There no need to continue the death penalty. Who makes the decision to take a criminal's life? They may have done a bad crime to get them in the predicament they're in, but it's not okay for another human being(judge) to decide when someone should be sentenced to death. It could at the least be decided by multiple individuals, that one judge may have a bias feeling towards the criminal, or the judge may be prejudice towards different races, there are too many factors against why this important decision should not be made by one person.

Get more content

–

Argumentative

Essay

On Death Penalty

Vishaldeep 1

Vishaldeep Singh

Instructor Michal Latala

English 103

15 June 2017

Sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding. The death penalty is something that many people do not have a clear decision on. Many people support the death penalty, while others wish for the death penalty to be abolished, and there are some that support the death penalty, but only in certain cases. My personal opinion on the death penalty is, it should be administered only in cases of particularly cruel crimes, or serial crimes such as serial murder. Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments. The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an innocent person is put to death, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death. Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death, even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unplanned loss. We have also decided that the advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society surpass the losses of the offender.

The second argument against capital punishment is that it is unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. Once again, this is a separate issue. The rich are more likely to get off with a lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong. However, this is yet another problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing. The third argument is actually a reply to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the

Get more content

Argumentative Essay On Death

Penalty

Hanson Yang Professor Littlefield

English 111

23 July 2017

Death Penalty

Every society has a set of laws that are used to maintain order within the society. Crime laws are enforced to reduce crimes. If the laws were broken, people would receive consequences that are equal to the magnitude of the crime. Although all sanctions should equal the crime, there is a controversial method: the death penalty. Death punishment is a cruel fate even for a criminal who had cause great harms. The death penalty has more negative impacts than benefits. It is an ineffective method to punish someone for a crime because of its high percentage of error and the high costs of performing such sanction. It is also an outdated practice that many countries have...show more content... However, some were unfortunate and their innocence was proven after they were executed. An example of an unjustifiable execution is the death of Caryl Chessman. In 1948 in Los Angeles, there was a series of robbery and rape conducted by the "Red Light Bandit". This criminal drove a car with a red light that was similar to the sirens on police cars. The criminal used this light to stop drivers and rob or rape them. Chessman became a suspect because he had a car with a similar red light. He declared his innocence but was still taken into custody. The jury found him guilty and he was sentenced to death. On May 2, 1960, as Chessman was being strapped into the chair in the gas chamber at San Quentin, an attorney was in Sacramento, presenting a motion to the Judge of the California Supreme Court. The presentation is about the "real" culprit, Charles Terranova, who fit the description provided by victims of the "Red Light Bandit." The Judge tried to call the Warden at San Quentin to halt the execution, but his secretary misdialed the number until it was too late: the execution had already begun. And with that, Chessman was falsely accused of a crime he did not committed and was sentenced to an unjustifiable death.

Nevertheless to say, the time and the effort that was placed into a case like Chessman's was a total waste. The cost of death penalty is far more than other punishments because more

Get more content

Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty

Maddison Higdon

Mrs. Gallos

English 3

21 November 2017

The Death Penalty

From 1973 to mid 2017, the death penalty has been used over 1,400. This highly opinionated topic has been intensely debated among the country's top scholars.

Justice along with closure, is a large argument that most people bring up while debating this topic. "But the only reason Belinda Crites needs to support the death penalty is 'what Eric Nance did to my cousin.'" (Santhanam). The argument of whether families of the victim get closure or not is entirely based on opinions. Though most people say that it is more revenge than justice, many families believe that with the proper execution of the criminal, it sets their mind at ease. "The verdict, undoubtedly a...show more content...

Georgia. Gregg was charged with armed robbery and murder, he plead that his sentence to death was cruel and unusual. The judges ruled that it was neither cruel nor unusual punishment. With this man's death people now understood that he would no longer cause any harm to the community or to others around him. "'Two men convicted of killing two police officers in Hattiesburg, MS will not do any more killing. That's for sure.'"(Should the Death). Along with many other cases the criminal's career was ended. And in the long run, made society a better place for people to live.If a person had a problem with something bad in their life, they would most likely eliminate it. Much like criminals, the court system made it a rule to euthanize people whose crimes are too radical to be rehabilitated. The court cost are high in the death penalty cases, due to the fact that they are not a common occurrence. If it was used more often, the court time would be cut down and it would be less money. The process of euthanizing a criminal is only around $100, though now with costs of court time it can be over a million dollars per case. Ending a criminal's life is a permanent end to their crimes and burden on society. Overcrowded prisons are more of a concern for the prisoners than the death penalty.

Each day more and more people are poorly cared for and are starving in our state prisons due to overpopulation."Prison overcrowding is one of the

Get more content

Capital punishment is commonly known as the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty is killing someone as a punishment for a crime through legal terms. In 2014, six hundred thirty–four people that are 18 years and older out of one thousand seventeen people were in favor of the death penalty (Gallup). We use this punishment to serve justice for the life of the victim that has been taken. I am in favor of the death penalty and it should be issued in all states for people who commit heinous crimes. The death penalty is constitutional in that it does not violate the Eighth Amendment and an eye for an eye should be deserved.

The Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is not a violation of the 8th Amendment. Criminals do not want to face the...show more content... Irwin Isenberg said, "when you kill a man with premeditation, you do something different than stealing from him." You are taking away a person's life and acts of premeditation must be punished by death. An assailant has the power of the judicial process who protects their constitutional rights when they have been incarcerated and charged. Does anyone stop and think about the victim? The officers, family, and friends may have compassion towards the assailant. The criminals lawyer helps them gain publicity and usually turns the criminal into a victim, making them plead not guilty in the eyes of the jury; knowing otherwise that they are guilty. Criminals must not get away withmurder and their best punishment should be the death penalty. George W. Bush said, "...capital punishment is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives." Punishing murderers is the only way to discourage future people into committing murder to save lives. Justice should be served for the victims' death in that the murderer should die too. This punishment is reserved for the most heinous murders; murderers who do not get the death penalty and are released from prison and will most likely kill again; these people deserve to be punished by death.

It has been argued that the death penalty is inhumane and that it should be abolished because of it being cruel and unusual. Life in prison is punishment enough, some would say. Minors and people who suffer from Get more content

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty

The Death Penalty has a powerful meaning to it; it's not just a punishment for those criminals who commit a horrific crime. The Death Penalty offers the execution, gas chamber, lethal injection, hanging, and firing squad. The capital punishment is a topic that can cause arguments because some say it helps and some say it cannot help in anyway. The death penalty has saved lives after an execution, but it has caused many issues for families.

The Death Penalty was established "far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes" ("History"). It was also apart of the "Fourteen Century B.C.'s Hittite Code, in the Seventh Century B.C.'s Draconian Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes; and in the Fifth Century B.C.'s Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets" ("History"). The Death Penalty was carried out if it was drowning, crucifixion, burning while being alive, impalement, and beating to death. As the time went on by the Eighteen Century A.D. a man named William the Conqueror would not allow people to be hung unless it was a murder case. As the years carried on in 1608 Caption George Kendall was the first man who got executed while being record in his colony. Jane Champion was the first woman who got executed in her colony in 1632. The Death Penalty all started and it did minimize crimes stated in the early 1800.

Furthermore, the Death Penalty is only an execution for

Get more content

Every year over thousands of people die from the brutal and highest of all punishments, the capital punishment or more known as the "Death Penalty". Countries such as China, The United States, and even Saudi Arabia still enforces this cruel punishment. But is it really worth it? Today I will try to convince you on why this is an inhumane punishment should cease to exist. What do you think of the death punishment? There were many examples which the death penalty appeared in history. For example, during the medieval and early ages of Europe, before the appearance of modern prison systems the death punishment was generally known as an appropriate punishment for every crime. As many as 72,000 people were executed for the reign of Henry the 8th during 21st of April 1509 to 28th of January 1547. Coming...show more content... Over the years, the catholic church has slowly mentioned the approval of the death penalty, and developed a disapproving stance towards it. The modern church figures, such as Pope Francis, Pope John Paul The Second discourages these penalties, telling people to outright abolish them. There is also Buddhism, which states that "do not kill or cause to kill". Hinduism which allows, and forbids the death penalty. Judaism however does allows the death penalty, scholars of Judaism forbids the death penalty penalty in the modern world. Islam although allowed, states the every person has the right to live. As you can see, many religious although allows it. Still disagrees with it. Over the years many abolitionists, such as " Amnesty International" with over 7 million members, which states that the death penalty is the " ultimate, and irreversible denial of human rights". So this is the many reasons which is why the death penalty should never exist. I hope you enjoyed my speech, and do you agree with the death Get more content

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty

The death penalty, death as a consequence given by law due to the committing of a serious crime. The death penalty is given to those who commit serious crimes such as treason, terrorism, drug trafficking, and murder. The death penalty is a horrific consequence that has an abundance of improving to do for the sake of everyone. If the death penalty system isn't changed soon more innocent people will continue to die due to the mistake of the court. A death penalty is a form of execution for those who have committed serious crimes, the effect of this all is obviously death, as well as an extreme cost of money and innocent people's life at risk. The world without the death penalty is an improved world, no revenge, no hatred, no waste of money and most importantly no more court organized deaths. For example, improving the death penalty will decrease what taxpayers pay for it, and decrease botched executions. It provides a safer world for everyone. Second chances are often given to many people, it wouldn't be a bad idea to give those who have committed a serious crime a second chance. Allowing them to have a second chance will open their minds to the idea of bettering for both the world and themselves. The opposing side would believe that they don't deserve a second chance because what they have done is unforgivable. However, there are companies that do believe in second chances for felonies; Companies such as, AT&T, In–N–Out, Ikea and IHOP support hiring felons. Although

Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty

Cruelty of Death Penalty

There are many controversial topics in this country's politics and criminal justice system. These topics range from mass incarceration to racial profiling to three strikes and to the death penalty. The death penalty for many years has been a topic in which many cannot come to a consensus on, both in the state and the federal level. Although both sides to the death penalty argument have legitimate reasons, it is now seen that the death penalty is becoming less and less famous. It seems as if despite its vengeance for blood thirsty people, the death penalty has no positive effect. Death penalty should be abolished because it puts innocent lives in danger, it is expensive, and life without parole is better. The death penalty puts innocent lives in danger. Rarely, innocent people have been put on the death row for a homicide. Studies show that as of October 2015, the U.S. have executed over 1,414 individuals since 1976. 156 individuals have been exonerated from death row that is, found to be innocent and released – since 1973 (Innocence Database). In other words, 1.1 in 10 prisoners in the death row are innocent. Some of them get reimbursed by suing the state government for putting their lives in danger, for wasting their time, and disrupt their families. Then again, if these people were executed before appeal, it is irreversible, and there is no way to reimburse their lives. For example, Carlos De Luna, a man found near a crime scene where a gas

Get more content