Herald t h e
By and for the students of Hobart and William Smith Colleges November October 20, 3, 2006 2006
Issue 7 6
Saga Continues to Improve With Student’s Interests at Heart looking for a complete meal. Sodexho, Saga’s parent company, Hobart and William Smith’s already had the Cyber Wrap dining center, Saga, has con- station available, but it still took tinually been trying to elevate its considerable time, energy, and dining experience this year, and money to implement it at HWS; recently has added an entirely “We had this plan to make things new station to the menu. On better a long time ago, it just took Monday, October 21st, students until now to set it up.” Condrey were able to enjoy the option of a Said. The Cyber Wrap station “Cyber Wrap” during meals. goes along with the changes in “We’re really trying to make the main buffet location, such as things better for the students,” the “Just Veggin” station, and the Service Supervisor Marvin Con- salad bars new layout. drey said recently. “Hopefully there Hopewill be fully the shorter Cyber l i n e s Wrap with the station new opw i t h tions.” Gwen in He elabcharge orated. can gain Increasas much es in popularstudent ity with populas t u tion have dents as led to a photo courtesy of Floyedthefoodguy.com. Showmore crowded dining time Joe. center, and adding the new sta- The station shows that Saga tion should help streamline and certainly is trying to appease quicken mealtimes. HWS students more this year, The Cyber Wrap station works “We do listen” Condrey said, similarly to Showtime, providing “We come up with new options an alternative of wraps, specialty because we want everyone to be salads (pasta, macaroni, etc.) happy here.” and a soup selection to students Caitlin Thompson‘09 Herald Reporter
HWS Ranks 19 on List of Politically Apathetic Schools by Princeton Review Roger Arnold ‘10 Herald Reporter
The “accolades and rankings” section on the Hobart & William Smith web site lists all of the Colleges’ rankings from recent times. The heading, found under the admissions link, ranges from the listings of both the well known “College with a Conscious” title to the information that the Colleges are regarded highly in CosmoGirl! Magazine as one of their top fifty liberal arts colleges for women. “Accolades and rankings” is quite thorough, even including the fact that the web site itself is given a grade of “A,” through the National Research Center for College & University Admissions. Through all of this, though, it seems quite interesting that the new 2007 ranking from the Princeton Review that places HWS number 19 under the category “Election? What Election?” is not included. The rankings come from Princeton Review’s administered eighty question survey which asks students about their school’s academics,
Op-Ed
A&E
Vote or Die
Are we politically Apathetic ?
Courses for 2007
4
administration, campus life, student body, and themselves. For the 2007 version, ranking lists tallies fbased on surveys of 115,000 students (about 300 per college campus) at 361 schools that are ranked as the best in America during the 2005-06 and or “previous two school years.”
The ranking confuses some students. Sarah Caffrey, class of 2010, attended the President’s forum last month with James Joseph, former ambassador to South Africa, in addition to the Dessert and Discussion with President Garean and Professor Iva Deutchman. “ I don’t understand how we can be a College with a Conscience and politically apathetic at the same time,“ Caffrey said. First Year Darcie Lepore at-
Sports
Campus Life
2
VOLUME CXXX
6
Captial Campaign
8
tends two political science classes in which everyone is registered to vote. Liz Witbeck and Emma Daley, also members of the class of 2010, opened their mailboxes mid-October to discover their absentee ballots, provided through the initiative of HWS Votes, an organization started in order to “create a sense of civic duty among students through active participation in the democratic process.” Other students, however, were not completely taken back from the ranking. Kenny Roden, a first year, stated that “It depresses me to see how much student power is not used,“ referencing the apathy that he sees in the lack of participation at Student Government meetings. “Students do not come to student government, despite Dean and faculty encouragement,” stated Roden. “There are usually no more than twelve people at meetings.” Email correspondence with Princeton Review Ombudsman Suellen Glasser stressed the idea that rankings are “merely presented
Continued on page 2
Class of 2007 don’t forget the Champagne Toast on 11/4