Portfoilio_Huanran

HUANRAN LI SELECTED WORK 2019-2023 MASTER IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN (MLA2) CORNELL UNIVERISY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND LIFE SCIENCE

01 PATH DE SIGN - RAVE N NA PARK S U F U R S P RI NG WA LK 02 SPARTAN BURG, MORGAN SQUARE RENOVAT I ON A ND D ES I GN 03 CL IM ATE ADAPTIVE DE SIGN, H UDSON RIVE RFRONT B ROW NF I ELD REM ED I AT I ON 04 TRE E OF LIFE GOOGLE DATA B A S E D ES GI N 05 WORK SAMPLE AUTCAD/RE NDE RING/ P ROJCE T M A NGEM ENT

01 R AV EN N A PAR K S U F U R S P R I N G WAL K

Nestled in the heart of Ravenna Park, the Sufur Spring Walk encapsulates the essence of the wabi-sabi design philosophy, harmonizing the transient beauty of nature with human craftsmanship.

The intention was to create a minimalist, aesthetic experience, enabling visitors to reconnect with nature and embrace the impermanent beauty of their surroundings.

SITE STUDY The landscape was initially surveyed, analyzed, and conceptualized. This process involved creating detailed diagrams of site conditions like moisture levels, elevation variations, wind patterns, and visual dynamics, enhancing the user’s experiential journey and informing the final design.

PLAN AND SECTION The plan view reveals a meandering path of wooden planks, panel areas provide consistency, guiding visitors through aggregate, and stone panels, laid beside the capricious river, a sensory journey of changing views, sounds, and colors offering a stark contrast between the path’s stability and reflected in the flowing river. the river’s dynamism. The wooden plank road and stone

2.STONE BRIDGE

4. RIVERSIDE

1.

1.ENTRANCE

3. FOREST 2.

HANDCRAFT INK PLAN

3.

The path broadens into aggregate sections, acting as contemplative nodes that invite visitors to pause, sit, and immerse in the sounds of the rushing water and the subtle color variations of the river. Durable materials are intentionally selected.

4.

CHARCOAL PAINTED SECTION

ENTRANCE

EXIT

HIDING PATH CONNET TO STONE PANEL

DIRECTIONAL WOODEN PANEL

EXPERIENCE DESIGN The Path Design for Ravenna Park’s Sulfur Spring Walk ingeniously juxtaposes the dichotomy of dry and wet experiences.major part of the user’s experience. Crafted with meticulous precision, the path invites guests on a journey that oscillates between arid landscapes and humid

atmospheres through rain season in Seattle, evoking a sense of awe and wonder. On the dry season, the trail meanders through carefully selected drought-resistant flora, their textures and hues conjuring a karesansui styled sideview.

WETSEASON LANSCAPE VIEW

DRY SEASON LANSCAPE VIEW

SITE ALALYSIS The design concept comes from the traditional Japanese Wabi-Sabi shifting view continuously changing riverbank and path’s stability and stone garden, new path comprised by wooden plank road, aggregate, consistency, meanwhile making different sound, light and color of stone panel is opened at the side of the river. The durable choice of flowing river major part of the user’s experience. materials are used to emphasize the dramatic difference between the

FAWN LILY

COMMON YARROW

MALE FERN

SOFT RUSH

GUMMWEED

OAK FERN

BIG LEAF MAPLE

HARD STEM BULLRUSH

STICKA MOUNTIAN ASH

WESTERN RED CEDER

LADY FERN

PACIFIC SILVER FIR

COMMON JUNIPER

02 S PARTAN B U R G, M OR GAN S QUAR E R EN OVAT I ON AN D DES I GN

The City of Spartanburg along with community stakeholders and leaders have been united in a concerted effort to revitalize our city’s central commercial district, drawing over $200 million in new private investment to the area surrounding Morgan Square. Slated to add to that vibrancy is $270+ million in public investment.

The design purpose is to build upon the revitalization efforts and economic growth of Downtown Spartanburg.

The aim is to attract further private investment, enhance the community experience, and serve as a vibrant focal point for the city’s central commercial district.

Project during MKSK internship, responsible for design developemnt, diagam and rendering.

SITE STUDY + COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The study area is generally bound by Main Street, Church Street, Dunbar Street, and Magnolia Street but also extends to the building edges and their sidewalk spaces around its perimeter.

That renewed focus and the historic level of investment have seen Downtown Spartanburg flourish, welcoming hundreds of new residents and more than 100 new businesses along the

way. Slated to add to that vibrancy is $270+ million in public investment, which includes the new Spartanburg County Judicial Center and a planned City/County joint local government facility, both of which will be visible from the square. Additional private investment in Downtown Spartanburg over the coming years is expected to reach well over $100 million.

BR

H

RC

U CH

OA D

ST

We asked the public to place up to 3 green dots where they felt the most comfortable and uncomfortable. the diagram are then generated based on public reflection .

The result are gathered from the First

RE

ET

Community Workshop, Online survey and mobile apps. Over 500 Participants activly engaged in the survey. Based on the survey, we generated our design principle and guidelines.

ET

RE

ST

ON

EM

OR

MA IN

GA

NS

QU AR

E

DUN

BAR

IA

OL

RE

ET

ET

RE

STR

EET

EE

N AG M

ST

R ST

T GS

UNCOMFORTABLE MAP

RIN

SP

T

W

N OH TJ

ST

S

“Dunbar not well lit”

IA OL GN MA

T

H ST URC

GS “Safety Related to Homeless”

ANI SD

T

S LL

E

EZ

IN ST

E MA

Study

“Everyday activation!”

“Creative Ways To Move People In Core”

AN ORG

EL M

“Ramp For Wheelchair Accessible!”

AVE

AIN WM

LEGEND

ST

N CH

ST

IN PR SS

R DUNBA

ST “Little Engagement With Pedestrian Experience”

“Site Lines Visibility Issue”

“Clock Tower Blocks main views”

UNCOMFORTABLE POINT

T

DS ROA WB

UNCOMFORTABLE ZONE SOURCE: COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 1

0’

400’

N

COMFORTABLE MAP

N OH

W

J ST

ST

R DUNBA

ST

ST

H ST URC

T GS

N CH

IA OL GN MA

IN PR SS

Extending design to W Main St can create a seamless transition to surrounding Downtown

“Dunbar - SW Love” “Weekly Programming!

Musicians + Art”

More shops and development on E Main St create a necessity for safe Church St pedestrian crossing

“Great avenue!”

IN ST

E MA

“Wonderful Spring Fling”

E ANI SD

E

EZ

Study

T

S LL

AN ORG

LM AVE COMFORTABLE POINT COMFORTABLE ZONE SOURCE: COMMUNITY WORKSHOP 1

AIN WM

ST

“Art garden area of Morgan Square near Morgan statue feels safer now that the fences around the triangle are gone”

“Feels safer at Magnolia and Wall crossing steets with crosswalk art and Square closed”

T

DS ROA WB

Opening the Square Slow vehicular traffic and encourages connectivity pedestrian first streetsto surrounding Downtown make the public feel safer

0’

400’

N

DRAWING FROM PUBLIC IMPUT - KNITING INTO THE URBAN FABRIC

REET T S A I NOL

Lines and layers of historical development provide a signature into a new design, both visitors and local residents will have the urban form that informs the arrangement of spaces, movement opportunity to learn and experience the Square in a way that is and circulation. By merging the historical forms of the Square rich with meaning, and uniquely Spartanburg.

MA I

N

CH

O

ONE M

MAG

Establishes a center CH green + event lawn R U

UARE Q S N RGA

Park as aperture to surrounding + historic architecture

Responsive to the downtown

EET

AR

TR WALL S

N

LS

L WA

NB

REET

GA

DU

ET

OR

E TR

ST SPRING

EM

H STRE

ON

ET

CHURC

B

DUN

EET

TR AR S

DRAWING FROM PUBLIC IMPUT - CELEBRATING THE LANDSCAPE

N

Connect points of same elevation for pedestrian accessibility and event

RE

ET

B

DUN

OR

L

NB

GA

NS

QU AR

AR

L WA

STR

EET

E G RIN

ET

S

E TR

MAIN STREET

SP

ET

N AG M

IA OL

S

E TR

EET

DU

EM

T

ET

ON

H STRE

EE

R ST

EET

TR AR S

CHURC

ST

ET

TR WALL S

C

RE

O

MAG

MA I

ST

UARE Q S N RGA

ONE M

REET

CH

ET

OA D

ST SPRING

R HU

Establishes edge condition along church street with

RE

ST

BR

STR A I L O N

EE T

Based on the strong desire of the Spartanburg community safe and comfortable movement of pedestrians into the to make the Square more accessible and welcoming Square and the provision of spaces for daily activity and for people, this design concept is organized around the enjoyment.

DRAWING FROM PUBLIC IMPUT - WAVING TOGETHER

OA D

Expands the pedestrian space along main street to create a heart of the

N

GA

NS

QU AR

AR

STR

ET

S

E TR

EET

E

EE

G

IN PR

R ST

T

MAIN STREET

S

ET

N AG M

O

LIA

S

E TR

Creates welcoming legible entries to the square from

EET

NB

LL WA

EET

TR AR S

B

DUN

TR WALL S

OR

ET

ET

EM

RE

H STRE

ON

DU

ST

REET

S

ET

O

ONE M

CHURC

CH

UR

CH

MA I

RE

ST SPRING

ET

E TR

ST

UARE Q S N RGA

MAG

BR

STR A I L O N

EE T

Morgan Square has been the center of commerce and public life community events.This design concept is organized around the in Spartanburg for centuries. The Square has the opportunity to safe and comfortable movement of pedestrians into the Square recapture its role as a thriving hub of daily business activity and and the provision of spaces for daily activity and enjoyment.

FINAL DESIGN CONCEPT - WAVING TOGETHER The final concept design of Morgan Square embraces a captivating water feature, elevating the senses and creating a soothing ambiance. Enhanced pedestrian pathways encourage leisurely strolls, while multifunctional steps add dynamism

7

to the landscape. The design seamlessly integrates a more efficient transportation flow, making the square an accessible hub of connectivity.

Specialty Pavement

CH

3

T EE

RE

ET

R

ST

O

ONE M

5

C

2 4

OR

GA

6

ET

EM

L WA

ET

E TR

LS

2

DUN

H STRE

ON

B

Raised Street

NS

QU AR

2

E

EE

8

1Vistor Kiosk and Public

ING

R ST

T

MAIN STREET

R SP

4

Lounging Terraces

N AG M

S

8 Dunbar Swings

6

Water Feature

EET

IA OL

TR WALL S

ET

E TR

STR SPRING

EET

Restrooms

5 Performance Green

EET

TR AR S

CHURC

R HU

3 Outdoor Dining Zone

ST

UARE Q S N RGA

MAG

1

OA D

STR NOLIA

BR

EE T

7

03 C L I M AT E ADAP T I V E DES I GN , H U DS ON R I V ER F R ON T BR OWN F I EL D R EM EDI AT I ON

Project in Cornell Landscape Architecture Climate Adapeive Design Studio instructed by Josh Cerra. The Climate Adaptive Design for the Hudson Riverfront Brownfield Remediation champions resilience and adaptation.

Situated on a remediation and Superfund site, this design incorporates an engineered wetland system for phyto-remediation, ensuring biodiversity regeneration while combating contamination. Futureproofed against rising sea levels and flooding, the development integrates climate-responsive landscape elements like bioswales and elevated structures.

Together, these components work harmoniously, transforming the site into a vibrant, resilient ecosystem, facilitating continuous environmental healing, and reestablishing human-nature connections along the river shore.

SITE ANALYSIS HUDSON RIVER SALT FRONT MOVING PATTERN

The water speed reach lowest from 25fiver miles and reaches its lowest speed at 75 river miles, then it’s going up again. Two high tides and two low tides could occur roughly twenty-four hours. The rise and fall of ocean tides, along with the changing precipitation and freshwater in Hudson River, create one of the Uniqueness in Hudson River is the changing salinity in the river.

Salinity reaches it’s lowest during spring and autumn due to the increasement

in freshwater, the salt front are pushed back to 35-40 river miles at Chapman Zee. During summer and winter, the salinity increases again by decreasing of the precipitation and freshwater that changing into ice. The salt front would be push up to 80 river miles at Hide Park. Most of the time it would be pushed to new Newburg located that at 60-65 river miles.

STRATIFICATION BY DENSITY FRESHWATER OCEAN WATER FRESHWATER

SPRING/AUTUMN OCEAN WATER

SUMMER/WINTER

HIGH MARSH CLUSTER FRESHWATER WETLAND

TIDAL FLAT + LOW MARSH

80 M

60 M

BRACKISH WETLAND

40 M HIGH MARSH UPLAND

HUDSON RIVER SALT FRONT SURROUNDING WETLAND SYSTEM PRECIPITATION TREND IN HUDSON RIVER

SALT FRONT ESTUARY ECOLOGY

the stratified water would offer a ideal condition for algae bloom during the changing season. The changing in temperature and sudden increase in nutrition would be the main cause. If pollution were damaging these area, it

would dramatically increase the bio-concentration effect and increase the pollution level in the whole ecosystem and affect local communities.would be push up to 80 river miles at Hide Park.

PRECIPITATION FLOODING POTENTIAL - INCREASEMENT OVER YEAR

SURROUNDING WETLAND SYSTEM

FISHKILL CREEK

LOW SPEED, LOW ALTITUDE

MOODNA CREEK MOUTH

HIGH SPEED, HIGH ALTITUDE

2020

CONTINENTIAL MARSH

LOW SPEED, HIGH ALTITUDE 2040

SECTION PROFILE

2060

SECTION GRID

2080

TOPOGRAPHY

SHADOW

2100

CON HOOK

CONSTITUTIONAL MARSH

MOODNA CREEK

FISHKILL CREEK

FUTURE PROPOSED SOLUTIONCONSOLIDATED IRON AND METAL

SITE SELECTION

MARSH MIGRATION The prediction from Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM) indicates the site would be transition to a high-marsh dominate site.

FLOODING RISK

100 YEAR FLOODING-2020 100 YEAR FLOODING-2050

The whole are are subject to flooding risk and sea-level rise risk. In 2080, 95 percent of the area would be subjected to flooding, and 70 percent of the area are coverd by tidal water.

100 YEAR FLOODING-2080

RESTORATION SIMULATION

CLEAN UP PROGRESS

Inject bentonite slurry before backfilling

Phase 1 including the off-site removal of west part, phased 2 provides the east part off-site removal. The remained polluted soil arecovered with geotextile and backfiled with 6 feet new soil.

Install filter layer and geotextile on solidified soil

EXISTING CONDITION The site are currently coverd by grass and simple pathway. The seafront are covered with stone to prevent loss of new-backfilled soil

Backfilliing with clean soil

RESTORATION PROCESS

TOPOGRAPHY the topography on site is flat with sharp seafront angle, which leads to a rapid transition and lost of wetland ecosystem diversity

Step1-clean up debris and extra polluted soil

Step2- New plantation+injecting resin/bentonite slurry

Step3-inject vitality to the ecological circulation

REGENERATE FRESHWATER WETLAND+LOWER PB INSOIL TRANSITIONAL WATER FRONT

PREDICTION AND CHANGE OVERTIME

EXTREME SEASON PROTECTION

The Hudson Riverfront Brownfield Remediation embodies future-proof, climate-adaptive design. Using sustainable, highly-insulated materials, it optimizes temperature regulation, while green infrastructure mitigates flood risks. Elevated platforms and coastal barriers safeguard against rising sea levels. Adaptive vegetation ensures resilience, making this project a robust shield against climatic uncertainties.

EXTREME CONTIDION - SUMMER

URBAN GREENBELT FOR STORMWATER RUNOFF

LEVELED PURIFICATION SYSTEM

ESTABLISHED PHYTOPLANKTON MICROECOSYSTEM LOW SALINITY FRESHWATER HIGH SALINITY SEA WATER

SOLIDIFY POLLUTED SOIL

EXTREME CONTIDION - WINTER

VIEW EXPANSION DURING WINTER

POSSIBLE FOR OUTDOOR RIVER FRONT EXPERIENCE

PROTECT ESTABLISHED ECOSYSTEM TO AVOID ICE ALGAE BLOOM HIGH SALINITY ECOSYSTEM TRANSITION HIGH SALINITY SEA WATER

SOLIDIFY POLLUTED SOIL

REGENERATE FRESHWATER WETLAND+LOWER PB INSOIL SEASONAL SPAN Resilience and Adaptability: The design is conceived to accommodate the variable realities of climate change, with specific focus on flooding and sea level rise. It will include floodable landscapes, adaptable infrastructure, and elevated structures for resilience against water level changes.

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The project is aimed at biodiversity enhancement and restoration of ecosystem services. Native, flood-resistant plant species will be used to create a natural buffer against sea-level rise and to provide habitat for local wildlife.

PLANT ROATAION BASIN

ECO-PUBLIC SPACE

Community Engagement: The design promotes community involvement and education. Informative installations will be placed throughout the site to educate visitors on the importance of climate resilience and adaptive solutions.Living Breakwaters: Offshore breakwaters using native oyster colonies will help reduce the energy of waves during storms, decrease erosion, and increase overall resilience of the riverfront. Climate Education Center: An interactive center focused on climate change and adaptive design. It will serve as an educational hub for the local community and visitors.

SEAFRONT VIEW PLATFORM

DIVERSIFIED PLANT WALK

SEAFRONT BIKEVIEW

PROTECTION ZONE + RESEARCH AREA

By incorporating these innovative design elements, the Hudson Riverfront Brownfield Remediation project aims to transform a neglected site into a resilient, eco-friendly, and vibrant public space that will not only enhance the local ecosystem but also serve as a beacon for climate adaptive design strategies worldwide.

04 WAL L K I L L R I V ER BEN C H R ES TOR AT I ON

This Interdisciplinary BE project is for students from Architecture, Construction Management, Landscape Design, Real Estate, and Urban Design and Planning work in teams in a collaborative environment to develop and deliver design proposals for a living building data center design (DCD). The target of the project is to satisfy the LBC(Living building challenge).

The challenge of the project comes from the conspicuous enegy cost and life cycle cost. To achieve carbon 0, the design team comprised by students from architecture, Landscape architecture and construction management are asked to create a DC at the center of the downtown seattle.

To achieve the goal. the project we desgined are comprised of three part: green ground level, data center shaft and roof garden.

Our geological reseach are based on the reseach of University of Pennsylvania, Data Center Desgin Studio.

Architects: Chen Geng, James Blachard Landscape Architect: Huanran Li Construction Mnanagement: Amit Kumbit

STRATEGY 1: WILDFLOWER TURF PRODUCTION

STAKEHOLDER MAP

05 WOR K S AMP L E AU TOC AD/R EN DER I N G/ P R OJECT MAN GEM EN T

This comprehensive portfolio emphasizes proficiency in AutoCAD, rendering, and project management. It spans a diverse range of initiatives, from meticulous landscape architecture design to comprehensive construction project management.

Leveraging collaborative engagements with senior designers, experienced construction project engineers, and specialized consultants, customers are guaranteed with a high degree of efficiency and quality. Throughout this process, the steadfast commitment to precision and keen attention to detail is uncompromised, ensuring an optimal outcome for each project.

AUTOCAD SAMPLE

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE + URBAN PLANNING

F L502

8"

3"

6'-2"

℄

17'-9 1/2" (5 EQ. SPACES)

K

M

AX

2'-2 1/2"

± 3'-5 1/2"

2'-7 1/2"

client / owner

#10 4 21" FLAT HEAD SCREW, 2 SCREWS PER BOARD, PER JOIST

City of New Albany project name

2x6 DECKING, PROVIDE 21" OVERHANG, TYP.

TAYLOR FARM PARK

GUARDRAIL POST TYPE A, TYP. ALIGN WITH DECKING JOINT.

PHASE TWO J

±3'-2 1/2"

TOP RAIL

5526 E. Dublin Granville Rd. New Albany, Ohio 43054

E L502 10x10 POST, TYP.

(2) Ø34" THRU-BOLTS PER BEAM CONNECTION TO POST, TYP.

Architect

Columbus Architectural Studio

BENCH SET ON DECKING, REFER DETAIL D / L505.

ATTACH TO DECKING WITH DIA. 41" X 1 21" GALVANIZE LAG SCREWS. PAINT TO MATCH

±3'-2 1/2"

I

405 N Front Street Columbus, OH 43215 p 614 541.2801

I

1'-0"

EMH&T

L5X3X21 WELDED TO POST, TYP. 1 4" FILLET WELDS LENGTH OF ANGLE SECTION IN CONTACT WITH TUBE RAIL, TYP.

5500 New Albany Rd. New Albany, OH 43054 p 614 775.4500 Civil Engineering

4" AX

±2'-1 1/2" VIF

H

EP Ferris

M

27'-9"

1'-0"

±4'-5"

4 1/2"

Jezerinac Geers & Associates, Inc.

Water Resources

PROVIDE ADDITIONAL JOIST AT BENCH LOCATION, TYP.

1'-0"

Structural Engineer

5640 Frantz Road Dublin, OH 43017 p 614 766.0066

C L502

1'-0"

462 SOUTH LUDLOW ALLEY COLUMBUS, OH 43215 614 6212796 MKSKSTUDIOS.COM

1 2" GAP AT TOP RAIL, TYP.

GUARDRAIL ATTACHED TO BEAM REFER DETAIL A / L503, TYP.

6'-2"

3"

GUARDRAIL POST TYPE E

L5X3X21 WELDED TO POST, TYP. 1 4" FILLET WELDS LENGTH OF ANGLE SECTION IN CONTACT WITH TUBE RAIL

J

℄

4"

L3X3X21 WELDED TO POST, TYP. 1 4" FILLET WELDS LENGTH OF ANGLE SECTION IN CONTACT WITH TUBE RAIL

3"

K

℄

GUARDRAIL POST TYPE E, TYP. H

℄ CONSTRUCTION

MELP

Prater Engineering

ADJACENT BOARDWALK, REFER MATERIALS PLANS. DECKING FROM BOARDWALK TO CONTINUE ONTO PAVILION STRUCTURE. PROVIDE WHOLE BOARD AT END OF RUN, TYP.

7 1/2" TYP.

ADJACENT BOARDWALK, REFER MATERIALS PLANS. DECKING FROM BOARDWALK TO CONTINUE ONTO PAVILION STRUCTURE. PROVIDE WHOLE BOARD AT END OF RUN, TYP.

2130 Quarry Trails Drive, 2nd Floor Columbus, OH 43228 p 614 299.2999

6130 Wilcox Rd Dublin, OH 43016 p 614 766.4896

COLUMN, SIZE VARIES

11'-6 1/2"

BEAM SADDLE

2x10 JOISTS MOUNTED WITH JOIST HANGERS, TYP. SPACING TO ALIGN WITH ADJACENT BOARDWALK, TYP.

G

G

2x12 BLOCKING AT 41 SPAN, TYP.

8x8 HIDDEN PIER MOUNTED TO HELICAL PILE, TYP.REFER DETAIL D/L502

VARIES

2x12 JOIST, MOUNTED TO BEAMS WITH JOIST HANGER, TYP. (2) 2x12 BEAM ANCHORED TO POSTS

9'-1" 18'-3"

A

TWO HOLES TO ACCEPT BOLTS

CL

BEAM SADDLE FORMED FROM 3/8" THICK STEEL PLATE

RIM BOARD)

2 34" DIA. THROUGH BOLTS (EACH SIDE)

CL

D L502

DECKING PLAN

SADDLE DETAIL

OVERLOOK DECK

B

SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

F

PIPE WELDED TO BASE OF SADDLE. PROVIDE 41" FILLET WELD ALL AROUND.

8 X 8 X 21 ANGLE (FULL LENGTH OF

STRUCTURE PLAN E

CL

RAIL POST, TYP.

8'-1 1/2"

SEPARATE PLATE WITH MATCHING BOLT HOLES

7 1/4"

±2'-3 1/2"

(3) 2x12 BEAM ANCHORED TO POSTS

9 JOISTS - 8 EVEN SPACES = 16'-0"

2'-10"

±1'-5 1/2"

2x12 RIM JOIST, TYP. 10x10 POST / COLUMN MOUNTED TO HELICAL PILE, TYP.

4 1/2"

F

HELICAL PILE

(2) 2x12 JOIST, ANCHORED TO POSTS OR MOUNTED TO BEAMS WITH JOIST HANGER, TYP.

1'-0"

±2'-1 1/2" VIF

PROVIDE BRACING AT END OF DECKING TO FASTEN BOARDS, TYP.

NOTE: · HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER ASTM A-153. · MATERIAL FOR SADDLE, HOT ROLLED STEEL. · THRU-BOLTS: Ø3/4" HEX HEAD, WITH NUT AND LOCKWASHER. LENGTH AS NECESSARY FOR POST SIZE. SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR. · 10,000 LB MAX LOAD, COMPRESSION ONLY. · SADDLE SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE 8x8 OR 10x10 POSTS

HELICAL PILE AT OVERLOOK DECK

E

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

8 1/2"

CONNECTING BOARDWALK

D

D

2'-6" MAX.

956.40

C

2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT

2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT

2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT

10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502

10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502

HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.

EXISTING GRADE

OVERLOOK DECK

D

SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

revision

date

issued

EXISTING GRADE

C

OVERLOOK DECK

SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

TIMOTHY S. SCHMALENBERGER 621

D

R

C

S

956.40

2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT

2'-6" MAX.

2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT

HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.

2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT

2x12 RIM JOIST, NO PAINT

10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502

10x10 COLUMN ANCHORED TO HELICAL PILE SADDLE, TYP. REFER DETAIL D/L502

HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.

EXISTING GRADE

EXISTING GRADE

sheet name

F

SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

OVERLOOK DECK

SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

DETAILS BOARDWALKS

sheet number

5

4

3

2

1

L502

D

AR

04.03.2023

A

E

IS T E R E

E

issue date

A

OVERLOOK DECK

EG

AP

T

B

EC

B

OF O TE HI TA

IT

CONNECTING BOARDWALK

O

S

8 1/2"

LA N

P:\2020\c20061.01-Taylor Farm Phase 2\BIM_CAD_GIS\CAD\Sheets\c20061.01_Details.dwg Mar 31, 2023 - 4:02pm-hli

C

HELICAL PILE LEAD SECTION TO COMPETENT SOIL, TYP. PROVIDE INCLINED HELICAL PIERS AS CROSS BRACE, AS NECESSARY. 12'-0" DEPTH MIN.

2x6 DECKING, NO PAINT

C

H

project number

c20061.01

RENDERING SAMPLE

SEATTLE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT + ESTIMATION

ID 1

Task Mode

2

Task Name

Duration Start

Storage Facility

66 d

Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09

0d

0d

66 d

Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09

0d

0d

0d

Mon 9/29/08Mon 9/29/08 0 d

0d

Mon 9/29/08Fri 10/3/08

0d

Phase 1 - Startup

3

NTP

4

Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc5 d

5 6 7

O/D Brick

20 d

Project Management Phase 2 - Foundation

Finish

Total Slack

Free Slack

0d

Mon 9/29/08Mon 10/27/0827 d

9/14

23 d

October November December January 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 1/4

9/21

66 d

66 d

5d

0d 0d

23 d

66 d

Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09

66 d

Phase 2 - Foundation

10

MEP Sub-Rought-Ins

3d

Wed 10/29/08Fri 10/31/08 0 d

0d

Excavation

MEP Sub-Rought-Ins

4d

Mon 11/3/08Thu 11/6/08 0 d

0d

4d

SOG

13 d

Fri 11/7/08 Wed 11/26/080 d

0d

13 d

Phase 3 - Walls

13

Exteriro Wall Framing

7d

Fri 11/7/08 Tue 11/18/08 0 d

0d

7d

Exteriro Wall Framing

14

Frame & Sihingle ROOF

6d

Wed 11/19/08Wed 11/26/080 d

0d

Fri 11/28/08 Mon 12/29/080 d

0d

9d

Fri 11/28/08 Wed 12/10/080 d

0d

9d

2d

Wed 12/17/08Thu 12/18/08 0 d

0d

19

Electric Work

5d

Fri 12/19/08 Mon 12/29/080 d

0d

20

Phase 5 - Exteriors

16 d

Fri 11/28/08 Fri 12/19/08 4 d

4d

21

Backfilling

2d

Fri 11/28/08 Mon 12/1/08 4 d

0d

22

Run Site Utilities Laterals 10 d

Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/084 d

0d

24 25

Masonry

10 d

Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/084 d

Interior Partitions 4d 2d

GWP

5d

2d

Electric Work

Run Site Utilities Laterals

10 d

Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08 4 d

4d

4d

Landscaping

4d

Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08 4 d

4d

4d

Form/Pour Driveway Landscaping

Phase 6 Completion

5d

Tue 12/30/08Tue 1/6/09

0d

0d

27

Punchout List

4d

Tue 12/30/08Mon 1/5/09

0d

0d

4d

Detention Vault

12 d

1d

0d

Thu 10/9/08 Mon 10/27/0845 d

DV Foundation

7d

Thu 10/9/08 Mon 10/20/0845 d

0d

31

DV CMU Wall

2d

Tue 10/21/08Wed 10/22/0845 d

0d

7d

DV SOG

1d

Thu 10/23/08Thu 10/23/08 45 d

0d

1d

33

DV Top Slab

2d

Fri 10/24/08 Mon 10/27/0845 d

45 d

2d

11

Punchout List Certificate of Occupancy

DV CMU Wall DV SOG

13 d

Thu 10/9/08 Mon 10/20/08

1d

Thu 10/23/08Thu 10/23/08

Duration-only

External Tasks

Task Not Critical

Inactive Task

Manual Summary Rollup

External Milestone

Split

Inactive Milestone

Manual Summary

Deadline

Milestone

Inactive Summary

Start-only

Progress

Summary

Manual Task

Finish-only

Manual Progress

December 11/30 12/7

12/14

12/21

January 12/28 1/4

1/11

Project: CM411 StorageFacilityHW11

53d

Mon 9/29/08Mon 10/27/08

20 d

Punchout List

23

Masonry

10 d

Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/08

Wood, Plastic, and Composites 22d

Fri 11/7/08 Wed 12/10/08

22d 7d

7d

Fri 11/7/08 Tue 11/18/08

14

Frame & Sihingle ROOF

6d

Wed 11/19/08Wed 11/26/08

16

Interior Partitions

9d

Fri 11/28/08 Wed 12/10/08

Finishes

2d

Wed 12/17/08 Thu 12/18/08

GWP

2d

Wed 12/17/08Thu 12/18/08

Plumbing

33d

Wed 10/29/08 Tue 12/16/08

33d

5d

Project Management

66 d

3d

0 h$0.00

Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

132 h $7,529.28

Mon 9/29/08

Assist Project Manager

0.25

132 h $6,394.08

Mon 9/29/08

Prj Superintendent

1

528 h $22,281.60

Mon 9/29/08

Indirect Labor Cost

$17,710.20

Mon 9/29/08

Overhead

$8,006.82

Mon 9/29/08

Fees

$4,403.75

Mon 9/29/08

Tax Insurance

$1,479.66

Mon 9/29/08

32 h $1,253.84

Tue 12/30/08

28

Certificate of Occupancy

4d 0.25

Ftg & Fdn

Tue 12/30/08

0 h$0.00

20d

0 h $25,594.00

Thu 10/9/08

13 d

0 h$3,073.00

Thu 10/9/08

4d 3 cy

DV Foundation

32

DV SOG

33

DV Top Slab

Masonry

O/D Brick

23

Masonry

31

DV CMU Wall

13

6d

Frame & Sihingle ROOF 9d

Interior Partitions 2d

Finishes

2d

GWP Plumbing

17

MEP Rough Ins

4d

Thu 12/11/08Tue 12/16/08

5d

Fri 12/19/08 Mon 12/29/08

5d

Electrical

5d

Fri 12/19/08 Mon 12/29/08

5d

Electric Work

38d

Mon 10/6/08Mon 12/1/08

38d

3d

Mon 10/6/08Wed 10/8/08

3d

MEP Sub-Rought-Ins 4d

MEP Rough Ins

10

Earthwork

17

$8,000.00

Thu 10/9/08

0 h$9,000.00

Thu 10/23/08

$9,000.00

Thu 10/23/08

2d

0 h$4,000.00

Fri 10/24/08

$4,000.00

Fri 10/24/08

53d

0 h $8,528.00

Mon 9/29/08

20 d

0 h$1,380.00

Mon 9/29/08

$1,380.00

Mon 9/29/08

10 d

0 h$4,148.00

Tue 12/2/08

$4,148.00

Tue 12/2/08

2d

0 h$3,000.00

Tue 10/21/08

$3,000.00

Tue 10/21/08

984 h$29,041.84

Fri 11/7/08

19

336 h $10,302.48

Fri 11/7/08

3

168 h $4,013.52

Fri 11/7/08

Carpenter Forman

1

56 h $1,598.80

Fri 11/7/08

Carpenter Helper

1

56 h $1,013.60

Laborer Class 1

1

56 h $910.56

7d

Frame & Sihingle ROOF

6d

8

Backfilling

Exterior Improvements

4d

Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08

4d

Exterior Improvements

Form/Pour Driveway

4d

Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08

4d

Form/Pour Driveway

25

Landscaping

4d

Tue 12/16/08Fri 12/19/08

4d

Wed 11/19/08

Carpenter Forman

0.25

12 h $342.60

Wed 11/19/08

Laborer Class 1

1

48 h $780.48

Wed 11/19/08

Laborer Class 2

1

48 h $608.64

Wed 11/19/08

Interior Partitions

9d

Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/08

10d

Utilities

10 d

Tue 12/2/08 Mon 12/15/08

10 d

Run Site Utilities Laterals

Fri 11/28/08

Carpenter Forman

0.5

36 h $1,027.80

Fri 11/28/08

Laborer Class 1

2

144 h $2,341.44

Fri 11/28/08

$1,435.00 0 h $0.00

2d

GWP

2d

0 h$0.00

Wed 12/17/08

Plumbing

33d

0 h $0.00

Wed 10/29/08

MEP Sub-Rought-Ins

3d

0 h$0.00

Wed 10/29/08

MEP Rough Ins

4d

0 h$0.00

Thu 12/11/08

5d

0 h $0.00

Electric Work

Excavation

Backfilling

0 h$0.00

Fri 12/19/08

38d

36 h $2,621.00

Mon 10/6/08

3d

20 h $1,304.00

Mon 10/6/08

20 h $1,000.00

Mon 10/6/08

2d 1

Exterior Improvements

4d

Form/Pour Driveway

4d 3

Landscaping

4d

Laborer Class 1

22

Project Summary

Duration-only

External Tasks

Task Not Critical

Inactive Task

Manual Summary Rollup

External Milestone

3

Split

Inactive Milestone

Manual Summary

Deadline

Milestone

Inactive Summary

Start-only

Progress

Summary

Manual Task

Finish-only

Manual Progress

Run Site Utilities Laterals

Fri 12/19/08

5d

1

Utilities

Task Critical

Fri 11/28/08 Wed 12/17/08

Finishes

LS FPDriveway Cre 25

Fri 11/28/08

216 h $5,160.24

Laborer Class 1

10d

Wed 11/19/08

396 h $9,964.48 3

LS Backfilling Crew

24

$3,603.00

Carpenter

Backhoe Loader

Landscaping

Fri 11/7/08

144 h $3,440.16

LS Backfilling Crew 21

Fri 11/7/08

Wed 11/19/08

3

Backhoe Loader

24

Fri 11/7/08

$2,766.00 252 h $8,774.88

Carpenter

Earthwork

2d

22d

Carpenter

Exteriro Wall Framing

Electrical

Excavation

Mon 11/3/08

1d

LS interior Finish

18

Mon 11/3/08

Thu 10/9/08

LS Frame Roof 16

0 h$1,521.00 3 cy $450.00

0 h$8,000.00

LS Frame Walls 14

Thu 10/9/08

7d

LS Cost

Exteriro Wall Framing

Thu 10/9/08

$2,698.00

Mon 11/3/08

LS Masonry

Wood, Plastic, and Composites

2.5 cy$375.00

Tue 1/6/09

$1,071.00

LS Masonry

Wed 10/29/08Fri 10/31/08

1

Tue 12/30/08

16 h $675.20

LS Cost

3d

11

Tue 12/30/08

8 h$387.52

0.5

LS Cost

MEP Sub-Rought-Ins

2015 -BS00-StorageFacilityTest Mon 9/29/08 - Tue 1/6/09 CSL By CSI

8 h$191.12

0.25

1d

2.5 cy

SOG

30

Wood, Plastic, and Composites

Mon 9/29/08

792 h $67,805.39

LS Cost

Masonry

Start

0 h$0.00

0.25

Punchout List

5

Cost

2,036 h $139,642.99 Mon 9/29/08

Project Manger

27

11

Work

824 h$69,059.23 Mon 9/29/08

LS Concrete Crew

10

Run Site Utilities Laterals

Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc

6

Concrete

10 d

Exteriro Wall Framing

22

4

Concrete

DV CMU Wall

13

Fri 11/28/08 Mon 12/1/08

0d

9

Assignment Units

66d

NTP

Prj Superintendent

O/D Brick

Tue 10/21/08Wed 10/22/08

2d

General Requirements

Carpenter

Masonry

2d

Duration

Project: CM411 StorageFacilityHW1166d

Assist Project Manager

SOG

2d

Backfilling

Task Name

3

Certificate of Occupancy

DV Top Slab

DV CMU Wall

Excavation

ID

LS Concrete Crew

31

8

March 3/1

Concrete

4d

Mon 9/29/08Mon 12/15/08

Electric Work

2/22

DV SOG

2d

Mon 11/3/08Thu 11/6/08

Earthwork

2/15

DV Foundation

Fri 10/24/08 Mon 10/27/08

53d

19

February 2/1 2/8

1/25

Ftg & Fdn

1d

4d

Electrical

1/18

Concrete

7d

SOG

Utilities

Project Summary

11/23

4d

Masonry

18

11/16

Project Management

Thu 10/9/08 Tue 10/28/08

7d

20 d

November 11/2 11/9

Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc

13 d

DV SOG

O/D Brick

10/26

9/29

20d

DV Foundation

2d

10/19

General Requirements

Thu 10/9/08 Thu 11/6/08

32

DV Top Slab

10/12

1d

30

DV Top Slab

Task Critical

Huanran Li, Mark Tian

20d

Ftg & Fdn

21

DV Foundation 2d

32

2015 -BS00-StorageFacilityTest Mon 9/29/08 - Tue 1/6/09 Gantt Chart (Aziz)

Phase 6 Completion

45 d

30

Tue 1/6/09 Tue 1/6/09

Masonry

26

29

1d

Backfilling

10 d

0d

0d

Certificate of Occupancy

MEP Rough Ins

4d

Tue 1/6/09 Tue 1/6/09

28

5

Phase 4 - Interiors

Form/Pour Driveway

Certificate of Occupancy 1 d

Tue 12/30/08Mon 1/5/09

11

5d

28

4d

33

Frame & Sihingle ROOF

20 d

GWP

23

6d 20 d

18

Punchout List

9

Ftg & Fdn 3d

27

Concrete

October 9/28 10/5

66d

Project Management

13 d

0d

66d

6

0d

Thu 12/11/08Tue 12/16/08 0 d

Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09

O/D Brick

Thu 10/9/08 Tue 10/28/08 0 d

4d

Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09

66d

9/21

5d

13 d

MEP Rough Ins

General Requirements

9/14

Mon 9/29/08Fri 10/3/08

Project Management

0d

Mon 10/6/08Thu 11/6/08 0 d

17

Project: CM411 StorageFacilityHW11 66d

Finish

5d

66 d

Mon 9/29/08Tue 1/6/09

23 d

Start

Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc

20 d

66 d

Duration

4

Ftg & Fdn

Interior Partitions

Task Name

Mobl, Site Preop, TESCE, Tc

9

16

ID

Mon 9/29/08Mon 9/29/08

3d

Phase 4 - Interiors

2/22

0d

0d

15

2/15

NTP

Mon 10/6/08Wed 10/8/08 0 d

Phase 3 - Walls

Storage Facility

February 2/1 2/8

3

3d

12

1/25

9/29

Excavation

SOG

1/18

Phase 1 - Startup

8

11

1/11

$304.00

Mon 10/6/08

16 h $1,317.00

Fri 11/28/08

16 h $800.00

Fri 11/28/08

$517.00

Fri 11/28/08

192 h$4,798.92

Tue 12/16/08

96 h $3,237.96

Tue 12/16/08

96 h $1,560.96

Tue 12/16/08

$1,677.00

Tue 12/16/08

96 h $1,560.96

Tue 12/16/08

96 h $1,560.96

Tue 12/16/08

10d

0 h $0.00

Tue 12/2/08

10 d

0 h$0.00

Tue 12/2/08

Finish

Details

Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Mon 9/29/08 Work Cost Fri 10/3/08 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Mon 1/5/09 Work Cost Tue 1/6/09 Work Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work Cost Tue 10/28/08 Work Cost Tue 10/28/08 Work (cy) Cost Tue 10/28/08 Work Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work (cy) Cost Thu 11/6/08 Work Cost Mon 10/20/08 Work Cost Mon 10/20/08 Work Cost Thu 10/23/08 Work Cost Thu 10/23/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 10/27/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Wed 10/22/08 Work Cost Wed 10/22/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Tue 11/18/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 11/26/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Wed 12/10/08 Work Cost Thu 12/18/08 Work Cost Thu 12/18/08 Work Cost Tue 12/16/08 Work Cost Fri 10/31/08 Work Cost Tue 12/16/08 Work Cost Mon 12/29/08 Work Cost Mon 12/29/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Wed 10/8/08 Work Cost Wed 10/8/08 Work Cost Wed 10/8/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Mon 12/1/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Fri 12/19/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost Mon 12/15/08 Work Cost

October 9/28

60h $5,481.77 60h $5,136.77

10/5

80h $9,544.26 60h $5,136.77

10/12

48h $9,902.38 48h $4,109.42

10/19

60h $21,806.55 60h $5,136.77

10/26

November

60h $7,678.54 60h $5,136.77

11/2

108h $8,129.55 60h $5,136.77

11/9

240h $9,996.55 48h $4,109.42

11/16

282h $12,467.78 60h $5,136.77

11/23

226h $10,262.52 48h $4,109.42

December 11/30

288h $12,990.29 60h $5,136.77

12/7

192h $10,532.27 60h $5,136.77

12/14

12/21

252h $10,350.49 60h $5,136.77

36h $3,082.06 36h $3,082.06

January 12/28

72h $5,049.80 72h $5,049.80

1/4

32h $2,368.17 32h $2,368.17

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

60h $5,136.77 10h $570.40 10h $484.40 40h $1,688.00

36h $3,082.06 6h $342.24 6h $290.64 24h $1,012.80

48h $4,109.42 8h $456.32 8h $387.52 32h $1,350.40

24h $2,054.71 4h $228.16 4h $193.76 16h $675.20

$1,341.68

$1,341.68

$1,073.35

$1,341.68

$1,341.68

$1,341.68

$1,073.35

$1,341.68

$1,073.35

$1,341.68

$1,341.68

$1,341.68

$805.01

$1,073.35

$536.67

$606.58

$606.58

$485.26

$606.58

$606.58

$606.58

$485.26

$606.58

$485.26

$606.58

$606.58

$606.58

$363.95

$485.26

$242.63

$333.62

$333.62

$266.89

$333.62

$333.62

$333.62

$266.89

$333.62

$266.89

$333.62

$333.62

$333.62

$200.17

$266.89

$133.45

$112.10

$112.10

$89.68

$112.10

$112.10

$112.10

$89.68

$112.10

$89.68

$112.10

$112.10

$112.10

$67.26

$89.68 24h $940.38 6h $143.34 6h $290.64 12h $506.40

$44.84 8h $313.46 2h $47.78 2h $96.88 4h $168.80

$2,758.48

$5,516.97

$13,324.78

$2,472.77

$1,521.00

$472.77 0.38 $57.69

$945.54 0.77 $115.38

$1,181.92 0.96 $144.23

$472.77 0.38 $57.69

$415.08

$830.15

$1,037.69

$415.08

$1,659.20

$2,074.00

$414.80

$1,659.20

$2,074.00

$414.80

$1,659.20

$2,074.00

$414.80

220h $5,535.82

132h $3,321.49

$1,801.50 44h $1,107.16 24h $573.36 4h $114.20 16h $260.16

220h $5,535.82 120h $2,866.80 20h $571.00 80h $1,300.80

132h $3,321.49 72h $1,720.08 12h $342.60 48h $780.48

$159.44

$797.22

$478.33

8h $658.50

8h $658.50

8h $658.50 8h $400.00

8h $658.50 8h $400.00

$258.50

$258.50

1/11

1/18

1/25

February

2/1

2/8

2/15

2/22

March

3/1

3/8

3/15

April 3/29

3/22

4/5

$1,521.00 3 $450.00 $1,071.00 $2,285.71

$4,571.43

$1,142.86

$2,285.71

$4,571.43

$1,142.86 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $2,000.00

$2,000.00

$2,000.00

$2,000.00

$3,345.00

$69.00

$345.00

$345.00

$276.00

$345.00

$345.00

$276.00

$345.00

$69.00

$345.00

$345.00

$276.00

$345.00

$69.00

$3,000.00 $3,000.00

48h $1,471.78 48h $1,471.78 24h $573.36 8h $228.40 8h $144.80 8h $130.08

192h $5,887.13 192h $5,887.13 96h $2,293.44 32h $913.60 32h $579.20 32h $520.32

222h $7,331.01 96h $2,943.57 48h $1,146.72 16h $456.80 16h $289.60 16h $260.16

$395.14

$1,580.57

$790.29 126h $4,387.44 72h $1,720.08 6h $171.30 24h $390.24 24h $304.32 $1,801.50

20h $1,304.00 20h $1,304.00 20h $1,000.00 $304.00

170h $5,494.60

126h $4,387.44 72h $1,720.08 6h $171.30 24h $390.24 24h $304.32

192h $4,798.92 96h $3,237.96 96h $1,560.96 $1,677.00 96h $1,560.96 96h $1,560.96

2015 -BS00-StorageFacilityTest

Page 1

UW CM 331

CASH FLOW

Project Meridian Center for Health Location Scope of Work

Actual Cost

Baseline Cost

Remaining Cost

Cost Variance

$0.00

$0.00

$139,642.99 $139,642.99

Description

$16,000.00 $14,000.00

Dimensions W

No

L

3 3 9 1

11.5 21.5 31 26.5 404.5

H

LF W10*12

LF W10*22

Sheet Number Estimator Date

Huanran Li 5/12/2020

LF W14*22

LF W16*26

$8,000.00 $6,000.00

A-B B-C C-D TOTAL

B-C

1

31

3,4 B-C TOTAL

1 1

31.5 31 62.5

1,2 D-E

$4,000.00

1 9

$2,000.00 $0.00

9/28

10/5

10/12

10/19

10/26

11/2

11/9

Cost (Storage Facility)

Name

Start

Finish

11/16

11/23

11/30

12/7

12/14

12/21

12/28

3 1 1

1/4

Cost (Detention Vault)

Cost

Work

1 1 1

Duration

Phase 1 - Startup

Mon 9/29/08

Tue 1/6/09

$69,185.39

792 h

66 d

Phase 2 - Foundation

Mon 10/6/08

Thu 11/6/08

$5,898.00

20 h

23 d

Phase 3 - Walls

Fri 11/7/08

Wed 11/26/08

$19,077.36

588 h

13 d

Phase 4 - Interiors

Fri 11/28/08

Mon 12/29/08

$9,964.48

396 h

20 d

Phase 5 - Exteriors

Fri 11/28/08

Fri 12/19/08

$10,263.92

208 h

16 d

Phase 6 Completion

Tue 12/30/08

Tue 1/6/09

$1,253.84

32 h

5d

DV Foundation

Thu 10/9/08

Mon 10/20/08

$8,000.00

0h

7d

DV CMU Wall

Tue 10/21/08

Wed 10/22/08

$3,000.00

0h

2d

DV SOG

Thu 10/23/08

Thu 10/23/08

$9,000.00

0h

1d

DV Top Slab

Fri 10/24/08

Mon 10/27/08

$4,000.00

0h

2d

LF W16*36

LF W18*35

LF W18*40

LF W21*50

LF W18*55

LF W24*55

Structural Steel Beams

405 10,517

(+11.5 W14*90)

31.5

2 1 1 1 1

4.75 4.7 10.5 6.2 11.5 42.4

1

11.5

2 6 9

17 21.5 26.5 401.5

Assignment Name - Structural Steel and Metal Decking RSM Crew Description Page # No. 277 9,704

35

126 5,040

31.5 31.5 29.5 92.5

9

131 131 132 132 132 133 133 133 133 133 133

40

92.5 5,088

55

295 16,225

42.4 509

12

Structural Steel Beams W10X12 W10X22 W14X22 (USE W14X26 PRICING) W16X26 W16X31 W16X36 (USE W16X40 PRICING) W18X35 W18X40 W18X55 W21X50 W24X55 FYI Total Tons from above (no pricing) 15% Steel Connections & Bolts

Total Structural Steel

55

141

E-4

Steel Decking 3" metal deck, 20 ga. Galv

Total Steel Decking 11.5 253

Qty

Unit

UMH

Man Hours

42 LF 12 LF 402 LF 405 LF 31 LF 63 LF 277 LF 126 LF 93 LF 32 LF 295 LF 28 TON 4 TON

0.093 0.093 0.057 0.056 0.062 0.07 0.083 0.083 0.088 0.075 0.072

4 1 23 23 2 4 23 10 8 2 21

Labor Wage Unit Rate L Cost

83.72 83.72 83.72 83.72 83.72 83.72 76.72 76.72 76.72 76.72 76.72

402 8,844

108.5

Labor Cost

Material Unit Material M Cost Cost

7.79 7.79 4.77 4.69 5.19 5.86 6.37 6.37 6.75 5.75 5.52

330 90 1,918 1,899 161 369 1,764 802 625 181 1,630

17.30 31.50 37.50 37.50 44.50 57.50 50.50 57.50 79.50 72.00 79.50

734 362 15,075 15,188 1,380 3,623 13,989 7,245 7,354 2,268 23,453

2000.00

8,296

3000.00

12,444

Equipment Unit Equipment E Cost Cost

2.79 2.79 3.05 1.67 1.86 2.09 1.88 1.88 1.97 1.69 1.62

14-May Huanran Li

Total Cost

118 32 1,226 676 58 132 521 237 182 53 478

1,182 484 18,219 17,763 1,598 4,123 16,273 8,284 8,160 2,502 25,560 20,740

32

11,501 SF

124,889

0.011

127

58.86

0.65

7,446

2.64

30,363

0.04

460

38,269

12,651

38,269

TOTAL STRUCTURAL STEEL AND METAL DECKING

TOTAL 11,501 0.10

Date: Estimator:

Pricing and productivity from 2017 RS Means You are responsible for the accuracy of all excel formulas Shaded Cells require manual input Bolded unit costs are pre-determined.

22

25,511

133,475

4,173

163,158

22

0.15 106

E-2 E-2 E-2 E-2 E-2 E-2 E-5 E-5 E-5 E-5 E-5

31.5 50 1,575

SLB ON MD 1

Estimate Recap

Meridian Center for Health Seattle, WA NBBJ Assignment 3 - Structural Steel and Metal Decking

31.5 5 26.5 126

31.5

Project: Location: Architect:

63 36 2,250

11.75 29.5 277.25

1

26

31 31 961

$12,000.00 $10,000.00

LF W16*31

60,965 70,110

12,651.10

Page ___ of ___

F-5

ARTWORK

Sketch: "Position" 18x24", Paper

Sketch: "Reflection" 18x24", Paper

HUANRAN LI SELECTED WORK 2019-2023 MASTER IN LANSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN (MLA2) CORNELL UNIVERISY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND LIFE SCIENCE