THIRD SUNDAY IN THE EASTER SEASON [YEAR A] The Risen Jesus meets us on the journey. [Luke 24:13-49] A sermon by the Revd Dr Ross Fishburn, Academic Dean, Yarra Theological Union At Holy Trinity Kew, 4th May 2014 In many ways the gospel reading today is an old favourite for a lot of preachers. It’s an easy temptation to dust of an old sermon, or rerun the favourite theme: “and he was known to them in the breaking of the bread”, and preach on the presence of the risen Jesus when we gather for the eucharist. Or maybe we have been a bit more balanced in our liturgical approach, and we might hold that text together with “Were not our hearts burning within us while he was talking with us on the road, while he was opening the scriptures to us?” The preacher could explore the balance between Jesus’ presence in word and in sacrament, and how there are two “tables” from which we are fed at each eucharist, on for each two parts of the service. Well you’ve probably guessed by now that I’m wanting to go in a different direction; or at least that I want to say something more than those things today. The reason for that is this: staying in those readings of the text misses out on an important element in the story that we’ve just read. They aren’t wrong readings, just partial ones. Staying with the presence of Jesus to feed and instruct as the primary message would just be a limited reading of the gospel text. So I’ll come back to those when I’ve put it all into a bit more of a context. What stands out to me as I read this story this year is the theme of surprise and reversal. So we start with two disciples of Jesus walking to a village called Emmaus. We probably don’t think too much of that, isn’t it just any other Palestinian village? Maybe not. You see Emmaus was a bit notorious at the time, an old wound in the Jewish psyche if you like. Emmaus as the site of a particular piece of Roman enforcement of their power and control, a place where an example had been made of rebels and trouble makers. In 4 BCE, the Romans had crucified some 2,000 rebels after a failed revolt after the death of Herod the Great. So that makes a seven mile journey to Emmaus potentially a very odd things for a pair of depressed disciples to do. It sounds almost as odd as taking a pleasant weekend trip to Auschwitz. Or maybe it had a deeper intentionality? Our rabbi Jesus has been crucified, so let’s go to a nearby crucifixion site to really enter into the mourning and grief? But whatever the reason they went to Emmaus (of all places), grief was not where they remained, even if it was where they began. As they meet the stranger, whom they were kept from recognizing, they find themselves telling the story of their grief, and of Jesus’ death, and discovering that there was a deeper story than they were aware of that was wrapped up in the events of the previous days. The stranger opens up the scriptures to them and reads the events of Jesus’ death in the light of that bigger, deeper story, and indeed reads the rumour of Jesus’ appearance in that light as well. This re-reading opens them up to the possibility of new life and hope were all before was defeat and despair. Only with that work of re-education accomplished, with that re-reading of events beginning to work its way from their ears and minds into their hearts are they ready for what we might call the “reveal” at the end of the story. The stranger stays with them as the day is almost over, and takes bread and breaks it, and in this new context of recalling Jesus in a wider context than just his dying, they recall his frequent meals, and especially his last one, and suddenly they know who the stranger is, and he is gone from them, even as he is known by them.