Health Equity: Today and Beyond: Actionable Academic Strategies
Aleeza Nasir; Andrea Ault-Brutus, PHD, MPA, BBA; Isma Chaudhry, MD, MPH, MBBS Hofstra University
Introduction
Health equity assures that every individual has an equal opportunity to achieve optimal health; nevertheless, institutional racism, poverty, and restricted access to care continue to widen gaps. These issues were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. During National Public Health Week 2025, Hofstra University hosted the Health Equity: Today and Beyond forum to discuss the challenges and solutions to achieving parity across sectors. This poster emphasizes fundamental topics and turns them into practical academic advocacy methods.
Methods
Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on a recorded and transcribed 2025 Hofstra NPHW panel. Using predetermined themes from the health equity and advocacy literature, transcripts were tagged and evaluated for common concepts. Additionally, inductive codes identified emergent patterns. Panelists included healthcare providers, public health leaders, community organizations, and academic institutions.
Results
Key Themes
Theme 1: Building Advocacy Capacity
❖ Cultural humility and policy literacy are essential
❖ Mentorship networks sustain advocates
Theme 2: Multi-Sector Collaboration
❖ Health equity requires coordinated cross-sector action
❖ Partnerships expand workforce, funding, and reach
Theme 3: Sustaining Motivation & Resilience
❖ Advocacy demands long-term commitment
❖ Collective support prevents burnout
Theme 4: Community Engagement
❖ Trust and lived-experience leadership are critical
❖ Participatory decision-making strengthens impact
Theme 5: Policy Impact & Government Role
❖ Policy can reduce or worsen inequities
❖ Disaggregated data is essential for accountability
Aims
Actionable Strategies
Actionable Strategies for Academic Institutions:
1. Co-Governed Partnerships
❖ Shared advisory boards with equal community decision-making authority.
2. Community-Driven Data Systems
❖ Joint data collection and interpretation led by residents and researchers.
3. Advocacy Training Pipelines
❖ Long-term skill development in policy, communication, and data analysis.
4. Barrier-Reporting Structures
❖ Systematic documentation of access barriers shared with agencies.
5. Collaborative Micro-Grants
❖ Funding models requiring shared academic–community project design.
6. Public Accountability Structures
❖ Annual equity hearings to report progress and receive community feedback.
1. To analyze the major themes emerging from the Health Equity: Today and Beyond advocacy panel.
2. To propose actionable recommendations for strengthening health equity advocacy across institutions and communities
Discussion
The findings indicate that health equality growth is dependent on continuous advocacy capability, shared governance, and true community leadership. Symbolic institutional outreach is ineffective without transparent power-sharing and accountability. The proposed solutions apply panel insights to real academic action.
Conclusion
Academic institutions play an important role in advancing health equity by promoting shared governance, data transparency, and ongoing advocacy training. Incorporating these strategies into institutional practice supports long-term, community-centered equity efforts.
References
Braveman,P.,Egerter,S.,&Williams,D.R.(2011).Thesocialdeterminantsofhealth:coming ofage. Annual review of public health, 32(1),381-398. Minkler,M.,&Wallerstein,N.(Eds.).(2011). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes.JohnWiley&Sons.
Israel,B.A.,Schulz,A.J.,Parker,E.A.,&Becker,A.B.(1998).Reviewofcommunity-based research:assessingpartnershipapproachestoimprovepublichealth. Annual review of public health, 19(1),173-202.
Roussos,S.T.,&Fawcett,S.B.(2000).Areviewofcollaborativepartnershipsasastrategyfor improvingcommunityhealth. Annual review of public health, 21(1),369-402.
Clark,E.C.,Baidoobonso,S.,Phillips,K.A.,Noonan,L.L.,Bakker,J.,Burnett,T.,...& Dobbins,M.(2024).Mobilizingcommunity-drivenhealthpromotionthroughcommunitygranting programs:arapidsystematicreview. BMC Public Health 24(1),932.