Aurora Davis repeats as SJU Invitational champion
Pg. 10
THE HAWK THE HAWK September 24, 2014 October 1, 2014
The Student Newspaper of Saint Joseph’s University | Volume XCIII | Est. 1929 | www.hawkhillnews.com
Yik Yak
Conversation heightens over anonymous app
Y
ERIN RAFTERY ’15 News Editor
ik Yak, an anonymous social media posting application, has created a stir of controversy at Saint Joseph’s University. Yik Yak posts, available to anyone within a five-mile radius of the poster, can be viewed in a newsfeed, with each post receiving a certain amount of “up” or “down” votes. With Yik Yak’s rising popularity on college campuses, some universities have had to address incidents of bullying through offensive posts. One student who was a victim of bullying via Yik Yak is a Residential Assistant in Villager, Mary Pensiero, ’16. After reporting an incident as per her duties as an RA, Pensiero was met with an offensive post on Yik Yak from students who disagreed with her actions. Due to this and other instances of offensive anonymous posts, St. Joe’s has raised concerns about the app as well as students’ general presence on social media. An email was sent out to all students on Sept. 19 from “SJU Student Life” that describes how anonymous social media sites can quickly become inappropriate and cautions students to be mindful of their posts, especially in order to please future employers. The email was sent as a reminder to students to maintain integrity not only in
person, but also in online communities. “As a Catholic Jesuit institution, which expects civility and a high level of integrity from members of our community, it is disheartening to learn of postings which do not reflect the civility and integrity that we seek to extend to one another in person. We ask that you remember that you are a member of the Saint Joseph’s University community at all times, whether on campus, on the street or in cyberspace,” stated the email. Cary Anderson, Ph.D., vice president and associate provost in the Office of Student Life, said that the decision to send out the email was made because of student complaints about harassment on Yik Yak. He said the university’s response is two pronged, the first step being this email and the second involving groups of students, staff, and faculty meeting to discuss solutions to problems the app poses. According to Anderson, the first meeting was held on Sept. 22. One person in attendance was Brian Lafferty, ’15, a Student Senate representative, who said that while no definitive plans have been made, many ideas were discussed. He believes students will respond best to student-led action that emphasizes not only the offensive material itself, but also the impact it has on students. “We want to address that problem too, not just the inappropriateness, but the effect of that inappropriateness,” said Lafferty.
Another member in attendance was Noel Koenke, coordinator of liturgy and music in the office of Campus Ministry, who said that she would like to see a campaign against the negative posts on not only Yik Yak, but also all social media sites. “Technology has just become such a commonplace for students that it really destroyed or lessened their ability to have authentic relationships...If you really did see a person, and you put a face to these comments, I can almost guarantee that those comments wouldn’t happen.” Dave Parry, Ph.D., chair of the communications department, said he believes that Yik Yak as a technology does not produce offensive content, but that it allows users to post this content. “The fact that St. Joe’s has on Yik Yak a lot of ill-advised sexual harassment posts doesn’t mean that Yik Yak is producing that—it means that Yik Yak is allowing people to express that and giving us a clue that that is going on so that we can, as a community, address it and say that behavior is not OK.” Pensiero believes posts like this stem from anonymity. “...Their ability to be anonymous gives them this power that they feel like they can just say whatever, and they’re not being held accountable for anything,” said Pensiero. Parry expresses a similar concern. “Anonymity can be a really powerful and important tool online and can produce some of the most informative and best
parts of the internet, but it can also produce some of the worst parts of the internet, and I think we can actually see that congealed around the question of Yik Yak,” said Parry. When asked how the university should respond, Parry said Yik Yak should not be banned, but rather St. Joe’s should encourage students to use it in an appropriate way. “I wouldn’t want to say to students, ‘Don’t use Yik Yak,’ I would want to say, ‘OK, Yik Yak exists as a technology, how do we as users shape it to make sure that it is used in a way that is healthy and conducive to our community?’” Pensiero agrees that banning Yik Yak will not truly solve the problem. “If they [students] want that outlet to say those disgusting things, they’ll find it,” said Pensiero. These offensive posts are the ones that the university would also like to see eliminated. “...A lot of the things that have been seen on Yik Yak are not the mentality that we’re used to seeing in St. Joe’s students, so that was kind of a concern, this kind of shift, because that is not really what the community is about at St. Joe’s,” said Lafferty. As students continue to post on Yik Yak, St. Joe’s will work to discuss what the best solution is to eradicate the offensive posts.