Skip to main content

The Oracle April 2023

Page 1

Follow us on social media @gunnoracle

Read about individual and team sports!

P. 18 Sports

Palo Alto Unified School District Henry M. Gunn High School 780 Arastradero Rd Palo Alto, CA 94306

NON-PROFIT ORG U.S. Postage

PA I D

Permit #44 Palo Alto, Calif.

Check out our website! gunnoracle.com

‘The math wars have casualties’: Conflicts over math permeate district, fuel debates over equity, accessibility Amann Mahajan Forum Editor

In response to a lawsuit brought by parents in 2021, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Carrie Zepeda filed a court order on Feb. 6 determining that Palo Alto Unified School District’s method of placing students in math courses violates the Math Placement Act of 2015. Those filing the lawsuit charged that PAUSD failed to “systematically take multiple objective academic measures of pupil performance into account” when determining math placement, relying solely upon a student’s course in the previous year to determine placement for the next and offering little to no recourse for students who feel they have been misplaced. Zepeda ruled in the parents’ favor and ordered PAUSD to adopt a placement policy using objective measures, collect and report data regarding placement and assign a placement checkpoint during the first month of the school year, among other requirements.

“Despite extremist proposals (and mandates), there is a rational middle ground, and many teachers seek it. The math wars have casualties— our children, who do not receive the kind of robust mathematics education they should.”

—Berkeley professor Alan Schoenfeld

A month later, on March 20, San Francisco Unified School District parents filed a lawsuit on the district’s math placement policies. The same day, researchers from Stanford University had shared the results of a study showing that SFUSD’s delaning initiative—which proposes that all students begin with Algebra 1 in ninth grade—was not increasing representation of Black and Hispanic students in advanced courses, contrary to the program’s initial goals. These events are just the latest battles in Silicon Valley’s “math wars.” Over the years, parents, students, educators and administrators have participated in a tugof-war over how math classes and pathways should be structured, who is being represented and what is being taught. Through looking at these past developments, we can better understand the conflicts of the present day.

The root of the problem Starting in the 1960s, “new math” took the nation by storm. According to a 1974 New York Times article, its purpose was “to stress the whys rather than the hows of mathematics, and to deemphasize the drill and rote learning that had been the substance of traditional mathematics education.” In PAUSD, schools such as Ohlone Elementary School were set up in response to the open education movement, which utilized these new pedagogical methods. In 1974, some parents pushed the district to open Hoover Elementary School as a “back-tobasics” option for students, emphasizing traditional modes of teaching math. The issue reemerged in 1995. After PAUSD classrooms adopted reforms, including group work and student-led problem solving, a group of Palo Alto parents formed Honest Open Logical Debate, an organization advocating for traditional mathematics over new methods. In 2009, the district adopted the elementary school curriculum Everyday Mathematics despite a petition signed by 700 residents urging the district to reconsider what they saw

as a curriculum lacking rigor. More recently, in 2019, amid heated debate, PAUSD middle schools were delaned so that all students would take Algebra 1 in eighth grade. In 2021, after the publication of the new California Mathematics Framework, the Golden State made national news. The framework—which deemphasized calculus, recommended Algebra 1 for ninth grade and encouraged the use of math to “explore mathematical ideas…in a social justice context”—was met with strong opposition from many. It is still undergoing revision as of April 2023.

Integrating all students At the heart of all these math controversies is a disagreement over what an equitable and effective high school math education looks like. PAUSD parent Avery Wang, who successfully sued PAUSD over his child’s math placement in 2020 and serves as an advisor for the plaintiffs in the current lawsuit, believes that the flaw in PAUSD’s system lies in its emphasis on equality of outcome, rather than opportunity. “We’re seeing that high achievers are being held back, and then the kids who are behind are being pushed forward,” he said. “We’re talking about kids who are (far) below grade level suddenly being pushed forward to algebra, and then you have other kids who have (learned) algebra a couple of years ago, all in the same classroom.” Wang has felt frustrated with PAUSD’s lack of transparency with placement data, pointing in particular to the “skip” test, an option offered to students at the end of fifth, sixth and seventh grade which allows those who pass to advance a year in math. After obtaining data from PAUSD through a public records request, he found the placement process in 2021 included questionable practices. While only three students met the criteria to skip a grade—scoring greater than 80% on a Schoology assessment and performing well on all “critical levels” on the Mathematics Diagnostic Testing Project—another 14 were granted a “pass.” These 14, however, were not the next highest scorers: A student scoring 56.25% on the Schoology assessment and a 42 on the MDTP passed the test, while another scoring 70.83% on the Schoology assessment and a 42 on the MDTP did not. According to Wang, the district did not respond to his queries regarding the discrepancy. Junior Benjamin Vakil, who has repeatedly attempted to skip a grade of math, was also vexed by the skip test administration. “I didn’t know how to study for it,” he said. “I had an individualized education program at the time—I had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder—so I wasn’t able to prepare for it.” Some math teachers, however, including Math Instr uct iona l Lead Dav id Degge l le r, point to

Math 6

Math 7

Alg 1

GEo

increased pressure on students when more options for acceleration are provided. “The moment we put multivariable calculus on our pathway, that’s (now) the highest class—so now I guess MIT wants you to get there, and it’s just going to double down the pressure to get to that class,” he said. Multivariable calculus has since been removed as a dual enrollment class at Gunn. Superintendent Don Austin initially cited the lawsuit as the cause for the course cancellation, but subsequently clarified at the school board meeting on March 28 that it was the lack of a credentialed teacher. Deggeller noted that the course has not had a PAUSD credentialed teacher in over a decade. Still, lawsuit plaintif f Edith Cohen feels that educators and administrators’ assumptions about parents placing excessive pressure on their Math—p.2

Alg 2

Precalc

Calc

Multi variable Emma Cao


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
The Oracle April 2023 by The Oracle - Issuu