Rotunda vol 85, no 17 feb 24, 2006

Page 1

Volume 84, Number HS17

Inside: Activist: Poor Living conditions in Granger Opinion, Page 3

MovieKeview:

Irreversible A & E, Page 6

Lancer Lunitics

in the Spotlight Features, Page 11

Waiting to be found not responsible since 1920

February 24, 2006

Wave of Parking Decal Thefts Plagues Campus Krislen Casalenuovo Opinion lulilor

At least 35 student parking dccals have been stolen off vehicles since last semester. The thefts have gotten progressively worse in recent weeks. Twelve parking decals were reported stolen last week and as of Wednesday, six have been reported stolen this week. I.ongwood police officials are baffled as to why so many are turning up missing. This is the first time an incident of this nature has ever occurred at Longwood, not even taking into account the alarming frequency. Three slightly damaged decals have been found on the ground, but none offer any clue as to how they got there. Longwood Police Chief Charles I .owe conjectures that it may be due to a combination of weather and shoddy adhesive. This year the decals were made by the same company as in previous years, but the style is different. It used to be difficult to pull off the decals. Removal tradi-

tionally entailed nothing short of a razor blade culminating in a battered decal in several pieces. The current decals can be pulled off and still be intact. It is also possible that delinquents are ripping them off for the sheer pleasure of adolescent destructiveness. Inconveniencing others is often a byproduct of • youthful rebellion, and likely in a small town setting. One scenario is certain; several Longwood students are lifting them with the motive of acquiring a free parking decal. So far two students have been caught displaying stolen decals on their vehicles. Both will be criminally prosecuted and will also be charged with Judicial Board or Honor Board infractions. Because the item in question is a piece of paper, the Virginia criminal code the theft falls under is larceny of bank notes (18.2-98). This code applies to any "paper of value." Whoever is found guilty of the charge is "deemed guilty of larceny thereof, and receive the same punishment, according to the

value of the thing stolen." Because of the high value of decals, $250 to be exact, the theft is considered a felony. Two weeks ago police confiscated a stolen decal from the exterior of a Longwood student's rear window and were investigating the matter. Ten days later, the same vehicle was spotted by police with a second stolen decal placed on the interior of the rear window. Officer John Thompson served warrants on the owner of the vehicle Wednesday for two counts of felony larceny. The second student was caught last week. That case is still currently under investigation. Chief Lowe reports that one of the obstacles they've been encountering in the pursuit of this string of thefts is that students are not reporting their decals stolen until they receive a ticket. "It is important that we know as soon as it happens," he says. Another even larger problem is the abysmal shortage of man power within Longwood's Police

Department right now. This severely limits the scope of t investigation, especially because the thefts aren't happening in any particular lot. Decals are being lifted from all over campus from the parking lots at Wynne all the way to Cox. Even several Stanley Park decals have been taken. ()fficers on parking patrol have been routinely checking displayed decals in student lots to locate the stolen ones. Officer Thompson has also been choosing a lot daily and combing every car in it. That is how the first two students were apprehended. Right now there is no end in sight to this growing problem. For those who have had their decals stolen, the Longwood Police Department is reimbursing the lost decal as long as a police report is filed. Chief Lowe asks everyone to check your decal regularly and contact the Ixingwood Police Department immediately if it is stolen or if you see any suspicious activity.

Top Schools Compensate Longwood Athletics Kristen Casalenuovo

Index 2 - Op/Ed 3 - Opinion 4 - Op/Features 5 - News 6-A&E 7-A&E 8 - Calendar 9-A&E 10 - A & E 11 - Features 12 - Features 13 - Sports 14 - Sports 15 - Sports

Opinion liditor

Longwood University Athletics are on the rise. The bill for it is rising accordingly. Longwood students are paying for the vast majority of it. The next main monetary contribution comes from top schools that pay to play Longwood teams as a perceived easy win to increase their rankings. Auxiliary activities, such as the Athletic Department, the Student Health Center, and the Student Union, are not eligible for state tax support since they are non-educational activities. Tuition funds strictly educational needs (i.e. - professor salaries) whereas the Comprehensive Fee funds the non-educational elements of students' overall college experience. Each student must pay the Comprehensive Fee, even if the student never

takes advantage of the auxiliary services. According to a report issued by the Auditor of Public Accounts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, I-ongwood's athletic revenue for the fiscal year which ended June 2005 totaled $3,731,497. The Comprehensive Fee accounts for almost ninety percent of that. Because Longwood University is a state instinition, all financial records are made public. The State Council of Higher Education in Virginia (SCHF-V compiles the records of all state institutions in the Commonwealth into an annual tuition and fees report. At Ix>ngwood, Tuition is slightly higher than the Comprehensive Fee. For the current academic year, Tuition is $3,666 and the Comprehensive Fee is $3,354. More than one third ($1,227) of

each student's Comprehensive men's basketball team last year, has Fee goes towards Athletics. not been substantiated, it is not The next highest significant unlikely in light of the contracts the Athletic Department has made with other universities this year. Men's basketball alone has raked in $208,500 by making contracts to play big name schools. UVA and Kansas State both paid $50,000 a piece. Villanova shelled out $40,000. Overall, all Athletic teams combined made $252,500 from contracts this year, up from $80,050 last year. Longwood Athletics currently ongwood Men's Basket ba has to schedule all their own recieved $208,500 in compenA games during the hazy transition nation from Division I schools to Division I status. It is to a top during 200S-06 season. Photo courtesy of Longwood Public school's great advantage to play a Helationt team of Longwood's caliber. A revenue source for the Athletic game with Longwood is perceived Department has been made the by them to be a guaranteed win subject of a recent rumor flying which increases their rankings. For around campus. While the partic- the same reason it is to the ular rumor, that Wake Forest paid I-ongwood team's disadvantage, so Longwood $60,000 to play the the consolation is a large check.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Rotunda vol 85, no 17 feb 24, 2006 by Greenwood Library - Issuu