Vision 2020: A Comprehensive Campus Master Plan

VISI9N 2020

••

•• /j

..I

•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

THE COMPREHENSIVE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

THE COMPREHENSIVE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN SEPTEMBER 12, 2008 REVISION 1 - MARCH 30, 2012 201 HIGH STREET FARMVILLE, VIRGINIA 23909 TEL: 434.395.2000 TOLL FREE: 800.281.4677

MOSELEYARCHITECTS

A Plii!OFESSIONAL COlii!POlii!ATION

•• • •• •• •• •• ••

-•

=• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• • •• •

..•

• 00 � � Cl)

I

Message from the President Overview Acknowledgements

~

u

0

II

�

.,.0 �

The Campus Master Planning Process ................... 9 Description of the Process Planning Goals, Guidance, and Assumptions

0

Cl) �

Remote Facilities Institute for Teaching Through Technology and Innovative Practices Powhatan Center Retail Merchants Association, Richmond Hull Springs Farm

Introduction ...................................... 5

III

Longwood University ............................... 13 Overview of the Institution Mission, V ision, and Strategic goals Regional Context V icinity Identification Historic Districts, Landmarks, and 100-Year Flood Plain Previous Campus Master Plans Design Philosophy

N The Existing Campus ...................................21 Campus Grounds Land Use Analysis Floor Area Ratios Building Adjacency Facility Condition Index Report Pedestrian Circulation Green Spaces Vehicular Circulation and Parking Pedestrian Orientation Housing Recreation and Sports Facilities Landscaping, Entrances, Gateways, and Boundaries Signage Campus Infrastructure Potable Water, Storm Water, and Sanitary Sewer Lines Steam, Electrical Distribution, Communications and Technology

V

V II

Landscaping, Entrances, Gateways and Boundaries Land Use Analysis Floor Area Ratios Building Adjacency Building Project Summary Vehicular Circulation Parking Bicycle Plan Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation Housing Recreation and Athletic Facilities Infrastructure Signage Hull Springs Farm Sustainability Water Material Flows Energy & CO2 Transportation

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences ................ 41 The Academic Program Space Needs Analysis Overview Student Enrollment, Faculty, and Staff Projections Space Projections Academic Space Requirements Support Space Requirements Group Inputs and Preferences Transportation and Parking Requirements and Preferences Athletic and Recreational Requirements and Preferences Housing Requirements Infrastructure Requirements Sustainability

V I Development of the Plan ............... ..................57 Areas of Opportunity Concepts and Alternatives Landscaping, Entrances, Gateways, and Boundaries Land and Building Uses Vehicular Circulation and Parking Open Spaces and Pedestrian Circulation Housing Recreation and Athletic Facilities

The Final Plan...........................77

V III

Implementation ........................ 101 Architectural and Design Guidelines Project Phasing Property Acquisition Monitoring and Updating the Master Plan

. .• 9!

•• •• •• •• •• •• •• • •• • •• •• •• •~

. ,

. ,

~

Introduction

I

• •• •• •• •• • •• •

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

5

CD Message From The President �

.0 �

With any successful organization, it is imperative that there is a focus on the future - the vision for the organization and the plan to make it a reality. It is with this best practice in mind that the Longwood community spearheaded a master planning process to determine the future landscape of Longwood University.

0

As we started the planning process, the planners were given two directives. First, the plan must be data-driven - accurately reflecting existing conditions and deriving recommendations for new facilities from pertinent data and specific requirements. Second, the process had to be inclusive. All members and groups of the university community must be given the opportunity to participate and their input must be included.

� �

I can unequivocally say that these directives have been fulfilled. This plan is imaginative, effective, and efficient. It provides both the vision and the method to help us reach our goal.

The plan addresses physical needs of our campus to address increased enrollment projections, including housing, academic space, and student life programs. All areas of Longwood were examined - from facilities to safety and security, from classrooms to bedrooms, from athletic arenas to admissions. This is a comprehensive plan that reflects a well-rounded review of Longwood's structure.

•• •

• •

Our new Campus Master Plan is truly the result of a team effort and every member of our university community contributed. The Longwood of 2020 will reflect what has been accomplished during the past 20 months, and the excitement for the plan is widespread. I am extraordinarily proud of the legacy we will leave for our successors.

Dr. Patricia P. Cormier

President

6

-•• ••

••

....

- = = = = = = = = = = = = ~ - - - - - - - ~ = - ~= Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Overview

(i)

In the Spring of 2007 the University began preparing to design and implement a new campus master P,lan. This plan will provide a framework for campus growth through year 2020 by creating sites for new build­ ings while enhancing the overall quality and character of Longwood University.

The plan also identifies early improvements to help sustain the momentum of Long­ wood's recent growth. These suggestions and improvements should help maintain and develop a specific sense of place reflec­ tive of Longwood's heritage while blending visually pleasing elements with functional realities. These suggestions and improve­ ments include: New Building Sites Adaptive Re-use Replacement Recommendations Greening Initiatives Circulation Patterns Comprehensive solutions of the best and highest use of available land and assets were taken into consideration for each of the many areas of opportunities that the campus presented.

The creation of this plan was based upon a broad range of input, detailed documenta­ tion, analysis, and inclusive dialogues with the various constituents and stakeholders that are affected by the plan. All referenced documentation and reports can be found in the appendix section of chis document.

7 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

f -f ~f . .f.. t f -f -1-~t I~ 1-41 4\

CD Acknowledgements �

"ntr due

.0 �

This extensive and complex project could not have been carried out without the enthusiastic participation, support, and encouragement of the entire Longwood University community - students, faculty, staff, alumni, and citizens of Farmville and the surrounding area.

Special acknowledgement and thanks go to the following people:

0

• President Patricia Cormier, for her leadership and support • Members of the Board of Visitors, for their interest and guidance • Richard Bratcher, Vice President for Facilities and Real Property, for his strategic vision, wisdom, initiative, and constant support • Members of the Master Plan Steering Committee, for their dedication and continual hard work • Reed (Jerry) Jerome, Longwood's Campus Master Plan Coordinator, for his continuous efforts and support • Kelly Martin, Longwood's Associate Project Coordinator, for her exceptional research, data analysis, and enthusiasm • Louise Waller, Real Property Manager, for her wide-ranging research and meticulous record-keeping • Angela Stimpson, Director of Facilities Administrative Services, for her sound financial advice and support

8

-

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

• J .W Wood, Director of Capital Planning and Construction, and Campus Architect, for his vision, perception, imagination, and practical support • David Pletcher, Capital Planning Engineer, for his technical acumen and unwavering participation • Ken Copeland, Executive Director of the Longwood University Real Estate Foundation, for his cooperative spirit and practical advice • Farmville Mayor Sydnor Newman Jr., members of the Farmville Town Council, and Town Manager Gerry Spates for their cooperative spirit and consistent interest • David Harnage and his associates at Moseley Architects, for their wisdom, hard work, and unfailing cooperation

The Campus Master Planning Process

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

II

9

® Description of the Process PROJECT

p-__ LJ

WHAT IS A MASTER PLAN

& TEAM ORIE TATI0N

DEF! E PROJECT GOALS, SCHEDULES & Ac DEMIC PLAN

s LJ

E"iROLLME, .T PROJECTIO •

CA EMIC & A MINIS TR ATIVE D A D _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � REQ IRED SPACE

DATA GATHER! G

UNI\ERs1n REvrnw SPACE

'EEDS ANALYSIS &

DOCUME TATION - PHASE

PHASE

1 DATA }

s

DATA A ALY I

1{

_

FORUMS & Focus GROUPS

CAMPUS & ENVIRO MENTAL INVE TORIES

Is uEs INvE TORY - PR10R1T1ZED

DEMAND FORECA TS

T E p

PRINCIPLES UNIVERSITY REVIEW

UNIVERSITY VALUES

2

PHASE 2

-------------

NEEDS AGENDA

UNIVERSITY STANDARDS & PEERS {

JU !sIVERSITY REnEw

COMMU ITY FACTORS

V1s10 ARY MODEL

EXPLORATION OF A

LTERNATIVES

PHASE ]

UMVERSITY REVIEW

u

COMPOSITION OF Ur-.lVERSITY RFVIEW

s

3

DRAFT MASTER PLAN

PHASE 2

f\lVERSITY REVIEW Doc ME1'TATION & REPORTS

UNIVERSITY REVIEW

PHASE 3

BROCHURES &

D

NIVERSITY REVIEW'

10 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

VI EO D

The Longwood University master planning process serves as a basis for the development of a current and updated master plan, as well as the basis for the continual renewal of the mas­ ter plan. Traditionally, campus and facilities planning was fo­ cused on individual projects, on an as-needed and sporadic basis.

The defined needs were then quantified and prioritized, and alternative approaches to address those needs were generated.

The new Comprehensive Campus Master Plan is a synthesis of the best aspects of the many alternatives explored.

p AMPHLETS

l,"I\ERSIT) RE\IEW ANIMATE

LONGWOOD'S PROCESS

The process used to create the new master plan was designed to be participatory and collegial from start to finish. Rep­ resentatives from each academic and administrative depart­ ment were involved in an effort to develop a program for the campus plan, addressing a broad list of issues and con­ cerns. Additional information was obtained from each group through several open fora with various members of faculty, staff, members of the town council, school boards, and the community at large.

CONSENSUS

T E p

Master plans establish a physical vision for a campus, pri­ marily through two dimensional plans identifying where de­ velopment should occur, areas of open space, infrastructure, and other elements necessary to create a sustainable, enjoy­ able community that supports the academic mission of the institution. A comprehensive master plan enables a univer­ sity to achieve integration and cohesiveness within a commu­ nity. Several key elements in the development process must be carefully considered, including land use and adjacency, infrastructure provision, environmental protection, open space, landscaping, community facilities, water conservation, management and sustainability. A successful plan guides an institution through its growth, thus contributing positively to the students, community, and broader society.

PHASE 4

Figure # 1, Master Planning Process Diagram

•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •,, ii .,,ii .,,,, ii

,, ,,.,,

-•

• t

•• •

Planning Goals, Guidance, and Assumptions PLANNING GOALS

PLANNING GUIDANCE

® n

PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

~

. Assist the University in translating its vision, mission, and strategic goals into a physical plan which identifies where the University should focus its resources to meet future facilities requirements.

• Provide guidance through the year 2020, but also identify early improvements to sustain the momentum of the University's recent growth and changes.

• Present comprehensive solutions for the best and highest priority use of available land while retaining the campus' historic areas and buildings. · Include sustainability as an integral aspect of campus planning, design, and operations.

• Inform and include all stakeholders in the planning process. · Develop a process that keeps the Campus Master Plan continually renewed and makes facilities planning an ongoing and integral part of University business.

5600 undergraduate students in 2020 Keep Longwood "like Longwood" Architecture -Compact, convenient campus - Pedestrian friendly -On-campus student life -Gathering spaces Green space Sustainability

The master planning process demands that key assumptions are identified and adopted to recognize probable future conditions and circumstances. Many can be derived from the university's strategic plan. The following is a summary of our key assumptions: Enrollment at Longwood University will grow to 5600 undergraduate students.

Sixty percent of all students will be housed in university controlled housing.

Off campus parking will be developed to improve the pedestrian nature of the campus.

Dining services will be distributed throughout the campus.

.§ ~

r.r.i

~

~

r.r.i

("""t-

(D

1--1

~

~

§ ~

i,--,t. •

~ (fq

~

1--1

0 0

(D

r.r.i r.r.i

• ••

11 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•"" fl'

fl' fl' fl' fl'

....• •• •• ....•• ...... ..•

• ••

'• •

•• •• •• •• •

History, Context, and Guidance

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

III

13

History, Context, and Guidance

@) Overview of the Institution

With a legacy oflearning dating back to 1839, Longwood University has developed a meaningful learning environment that extends far beyond the classroom. Founded as the Farmville Female Seminary Association, the school was a pioneer first in private and later in public education.

The State of Virginia acquired the school in 1884 and renamed it the Normal School, the first state institution of higher learning for women in Virginia. Over the years, the school expanded and had a succession of names, becoming Longwood College in 1949 and fully coeducational in 1976. On April 24, 2002, history was again made at Longwood when Governor Mark Warner signed legislation that designated Longwood as a university, effective July 1, 2002.

The legacy that began in 1839 continues today as Longwood University offers more than 100 majors, minors and concentrations through its various academic programs. Given its historical roots, Longwood enjoys an enviable reputation for teacher preparation, and the excellence has expanded throughout the university, which is comprised of three separate colleges: the Cook-Cole College of Arts and Sciences, the College of Business and Economics, and the College of Education and Human

II'

0

14 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Services; and a graduate division offering programs in education, English, sociology, and a new MBA in Retail Management.

Under the leadership of President Patricia P. Cormier, Longwood is committed to developing citizen leaders and provides a meaningful learning environment where students learn skills, knowledge, and theory, and then translate learning into action by doing research, internships, field work, and community service. Recognizing the value of experiential learning, Longwood is one of the few universities in the country to require all students to complete an internship or similar learning experience before graduation. Additionally, Longwood was the first institution in Virginia to require that every freshman have a laptop computer. Technology is integrated throughout the learning process­ an essential element for preparing the leaders of tomorrow.

The Longwood learning environment is enriched further by the Greenwood Library that holds 245,000 book titles, 2, 100 print journal subscriptions, and some 100 electronic data bases including access to 1 1,000 full-text electronic journals. The library provides integrated

technology for information retrieval from libraries throughout the world, as well as satellite reception of foreign programs and web access.

This state-of-the-art facility is named in honor of Longwood's 22nd president, Dr. Janet Daly Greenwood.

Longwood provides a range of business services to the region and state through the Longwood Small Business Development Center, while the Longwood Center for the Visual Arts serves as an important and innovative study center and cultural resource for the Commonwealth of Virginia.

....

•• ..

Mission, Vision, and Strategic Goals

History, Context, and Guidance

The L ongwood University Campus Master Plan will serve as a gu ide for the future phy sical develo pment of the university. The future development must be refl ective and su pportive of the University's mission, vision, and strategic goals.

@)

Longwood University's mission: Longwood University is an institution of higher learning dedicated to the developme nt of citizen leaders who are prepared to make positive contributions to the common good of society.

B uilding upon its strong foundation in the liberal arts and sciences, the university provides an enviro nment in which exce ptional t eaching fosters student learning, scholarship, and achievement. As the only four-year p ublic institution in south central Virginia, L ongwood University serves as a cataly st for regional prosperity and advancement.

Longwood University's vision: Longwood Univ ersity w ill transform capable men and women into citizen leaders, fully engaged in the world around the m. The university will b e a first choice i nstitu tion ren own ed fo r developing the power of citizen leadership in its students for the benefit of the greater community.

L ongwood University's Strategic Goals: • Distinctive Impact. L ongwood University serves as a unique and dynamic agent for positive and sustainable change within and among its communities and constituencies.

• Engaged Learning. The Longwood University community demonstrates a commitment for lifelong learning chat results in personal and professional g rowth thr ough e mphasizing active involvement, collaboration, and application of knowledg e. . Superior Per formance. L ongwood University achieves excellence in institutional effectiveness through continu al improve men t.

• Responsible Stewardship. Longwood University embraces its responsibility to manage human, cultural, environmental, fiscal, and capital resourc es effectively.

• 15

~

••

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

@) Regional Context (l)

u

~

c:rj

.~ ~

~

........

Farmville is a town in Cumberland and Prince Edward counties in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The population was 6,845 at the 2000 census according to the National Association of Counties, retrieved on 2008-0 1 -3 1 .

Farmville is a dynamic college town, with a proud history and exciting future.

The Commonwealth of Virginia is a state well known for its rich history.

Farmville hosts several festivals and other statewide celebrations each year.

d

.,

~

~

"

~

><

(l) ~

~

0

u ~

~

0

~

-~

00

~

.... .... .. .. .... ....

~

c:rj

Figure # 2 , Virginia State Map Farmville is located in Virginia's heartland - the exact geographi­ cal center of Virginia is located in nearby Buckingham County.

Farmville is the center of econom­ ic activity for a wide area, and a catalyst for travel and tourism.

16 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

-

Farmville is approximately 64 miles west of the City of Rich­ mond, 47 miles east of the City of Lynchburg and 76 miles south of the City of Charlottesville.

Vicinity Identification Since 1 798, Farmville has served as the center of trade, education, law, and finance for the surrounding seven counties, a position it still maintains today. Farmville has seen civil war and civil rights and has served as home to prominent government leaders.

It was and still is home to many successful businesses, industries, and cultural and educational organizations. After 250 years, the Farmville area, including Prince Edward and Cumberland counties, continues to exemplify all that is best about the American way of life.

• f.t~~ ~ ~ - - HIGH B TRAIL ST

Longwood University has a tremendous economic and cultural impact on Farmville and the surrounding communities. A recent study conducted by the Longwood Small Business Development Center estimates that university employees, students, and visitors spend more than $90 million annually - with 66 percent of that amount being spent in Farmville and the eight surrounding counties.

Longwood Property Downtown Farmville Business Residential Manufacturing

4, VJ.APity Identification

17 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Historic Districts, Landmarks , and 1 00-Year Flood Plain

-

FLOOD PLAIN

The one-hundred-year flood plain is typically calculated to be the level of flood water expected to be equaled or exceeded every 1 00 years on average. The 1 00-year flood is more accurately referred to as the 1 % flood, since it is a flood that has a 1 % chance of being equaled or exceeded in any single year. Based on the expected flood water level, the predicted area of inundation is mapped out in the darker blue. The lighter blue includes the floodway, which consists of the stream channels and adjacent areas that carry flood flows, and the flood fringe.

HISTORICAL CITATIONS Farmville is home to some key players in the early fight for civil rights; its citizens' crusade for equal rights in education drew Martin Luther King, Jr. and other national leaders to visit our area. The Robert Russa Moton High School (see photo bottom, center) , site of the 1 9 5 1 student strike, is a National Historic Landmark, a civil rights museum, and the centerpiece of Virginia's Civil Rights in the Education Heritage Trail, honoring the efforts of local students and citizens who paved the way for integrated public education nationwide.

Civil Rights

The Civil War left its mark on Farmville, with its last major battle at nearby Sayler's Creek. Lee retreated di­ rectly through the town, and the Confederates crossed and then attempted to burn the railroad's impressive High Bridge, a 1 20-foot-high, nearly half-mile-long span across the Appomattox River which is now home to the High Bridge Trail State Park. Sayler's Creek Battlefield and other sites along Lee's Retreat are part of the state's Civil War Trails.

Civil War

In the 1 850's a railroad, known as South Side Railroad, was built between the cities of Lynchburg and Peters­ burg passing through Farmville, Burkeville, and Pamplin City. This route was subsidized by a contribution from the Town of Farmville and required an expensive crossing of the Appomattox River. This crossing be­ came known as the High Bridge, which was heavily damaged during the final days of the Civil War. When the railroad was purchased in the early 1 880's, it was renamed the Norfolk and Western Railroad (N&W) .

In 1 982 the railroad became part of the current Nor­ folk Southern Railway system. Today, High Bridge is being renovated as part of the Rails to Trails project.

It will be 33.5 miles of non-motorized hiking, biking, and birding trails known as High Bridge Trail State Park.

Railroads

Secondary Flood Plain

- Longwood Property Historic District

•••••• Hih • Trail v g Bndge

,,,,---

18 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Figure # 5 , Historic Districts and Flood Plains

....

Previous Campus Master Plans

@

i I

:--

i=

!

J

;j 1 Cl ;I

Futu

Parki

§

m

0...

t ,�, J

-;..:i

~. ~

0...

§

7

(') (D

r·...,

1;Js nd Facih1ie

Figure # 6

1 985 Plan By WKR Associates This interim master plan was centered around and successful in ac­ complishing several site selections for the campus. A new library was located at the southwest corners of Redford and Pine Streets and proposed new housing west of the Wygal/Bedford buildings between Race Street and Griffin Boulevard. The Boiler Plant Expansion was also included in this proposal. This plan also recommended improve­ ments to pedestrian and vehicular circulation for the campus as a whole. In this proposal the college begins to focus on the removal of vehicles from the internal campus streets and converting those areas into pedestrian corridors.

�- ...e---

Figure # 7

1 99 1 Plan By Hanb ury Evans Newill Vlattas & Co. Several specific actions and site selections were proposed. W hile not all of these recommendations came to fruition, the following proposals were realized: a new dining hall at the center of campus, Lancaster Building renovation, an addition to Bedford Hall, and, most significantly, closing Pine Street to vehicular traffic, resulting in Brock Commons.

2001 Plan By Ayers Saint Gross The primary focus of this plan was in addressing the pedestrian connectivity issues of the north and south ends of the campus. The development of the new student life plaza replaced the existing intersection of Pine and Redford Streets, while providing for a parking structure below. Brock Commons created a central pedestrian spine for the campus and provided a variety of linked green spaces, permanently closing Pine Street to all vehicular access.

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

19

..• •..

•

@) Design Philosophy Q)

u

A crj

.~ ~

~

d

~

A

crj

"

~

><

Q) ~

A

0

u ~ 0

~

-~

00

~

•

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY AND PLANNING STANDARDS

•

The quality of exterior and interior architectural design, evoking respect, inspiration, admiration, and excitement, is part of Longwood University's tradition. Structures that speak clearly to this quality are located along High Street in the historic northeast quadrant of campus and have solid ties to the original campus fabric. Respect for these structures should be maintained with each new building's design and siting, making reference to the scale, proportion, historical character, and quality of construction.

.

It is also the university's intention that the campus remains residential

in nature and evolves more fully to a pedestrian campus that encourages and engages human interaction. W ith each new building project, opportunities for creating common areas and gathering spaces should be explored. To further enhance the pedestrian experience, vehicular access ways and core campus parking should be minimized and "greened" appropriately through the use of traffic islands, traffic circles, and raised medians.

Sustainability is to also have a greater part in the Longwood experience. At freshmen orientation, students are being introduced to the important role sustainability plays in today's environment.

To foster that learning experience and carry it forward, each new building, building renovation, and other program or process that impacts the campus environment will speak to that effort by implementing the most current standards.

OUR SORORITIES FOU Lonqwood College. formerly known •• the Femele Nol'll&III School. 11 the only U.S. a where four national sororltlel were fo Kappa Delta, follnded on 2:S Oct. 1897, nrst sorority 01"91nlzecl In Vlrq\ la. with the lonc,e,t continuous presence Coll�. Sklaa � S'9aa. W9$ 20 Apr. 189'"8. Ze1a Tau 41 pha.

IS Oct. 1898. la the only 10 rortty in be granted a charter ,sy a ~ a l General .MSeuly. The Prince Edw elrcult Court gra nted Alpha S'9 charter on IS Nov. J90L :All tour members of the NatlonaI Panhell which we• organized. In 1902.

-

20

@

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

--•., -..•..,. .,•

The Existing Campus

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

21

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN -----

IV

---- -

•

@ Campus Grounds 00

~

a u crj

b1)

.~ -~00 ~

~

><

~

(1)

~

~

Longwood main campus sits on 60-plus acres in the gently rolling

Virginia piedmont. Although a single campus, architecturally speaking the grounds are separated into two distinct areas: the historic "north core" and the more modern south end.

Longwood Golf Course, adjacent to the President's house (a registered

historic landmark, circa 1 8 1 5) one mile from Longwood University, is one of only three collegiate-owned golf courses in Virginia. The Longwood course covers more than 1 00 acres, and is known for its challenging layout, lush fairways, and manicured greens. The 6,000 yard layout plays to a par 69 for men and 72 for women and is equipped with two large practice greens, practice sand traps, club house, driving range, and pro shop.

Third Street Warehouse: Longwood acquired this 60,000 square foot

former tobacco warehouse on seven acres of property in 2006. Located approximately 3½ miles from campus, it is used for general storage and surplus property management.

Lancer Park is a Longwood-managed apartment and townhouse

community located .6 miles from Longwood's campus. 258 students live in one of three different housing style formats. Residents also enjoy a variety of community amenities including the Lancer Park Clubhouse, REC office, gym, study rooms, pool table, community living room, and vending areas. This area also offers various outdoor playing fields.

•• • Longwood Landings at Mid-Town Square, which opened in the fall of

2006, consists of four four-story buildings with retail-commercial space on the ground floor of each and student housing on the upper three floors. Bed space for 408 students is provided in 96 four-bedroom and 24 single-bedroom apartments.

Longwood Village is located two miles south of campus and offers a variety

of amenities including a movie theater, fitness center, swimming pool, hot tub, game room, and computer I study room. A free shuttle service is available to transport students to and from the Longwood campus.

A

D

C

First Avenue Field accommodates the practice and games

of Men's and Women's Rugby, Men's and Women's Soccer and Men's Lacrosse sport clubs. Intramural flag football and soccer contests, as well as open recreation opportunities are available.

Longwood Center for the Visual Arts, the art museum

serving Longwood and Southside Virginia, features permanent and temporary exhibits, educational programs, and an art placement service.

G

F

· -■

1

1

Points or Interests

I I I • •

CON,_ft CIIIITlltY DIIV PS Uawl\' G- 111'. PMCJl'ON 9CIIOOL

Remote facilities and grounds are described on page 39.

•• •• •

•• •

• •

I IIGUTIICIAft -NG ClltTIII ? cou.11 PI.UA -NG CTL

,(),p

•

- OPnCIIII

IO PIIST -

•

LDNQWOOD PIIIIPDTY

2

ARD � PRINCE £D"' --0

\il

M l>

3

CO.

3

4

4

5 �

pa

01 pEa I' = 0.2 MILE

a1e

Figure # 9 Town of Farmville

POPlA.ATICJi 6.8•5 72 SQUARE MILES

6

22

WAT S O N & D U G G A N PLC LMID Sl.aVEYUCi • Ca.l.S. ■ PLAI.IIICi 1001 CAST THIRD ST. •-ILLC VA. 23'01 Pt, •34•391•3'00 ••• •34·391·3'°I

A Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

B

C

E

F

G

6

• • •• •

Campus Grounds - Land Use, Main Campus @ 0% 1 0% EXI TI TG B ILDING FOOTPRINT 19 % SURFACE PARKT G 1 0 %

25%

40% 50%

Longwood University's main campus is a residential 60-acre campus, a mix of red-brick colonial revival in the style of Thomas Jefferson and contemporary architecture, consisting of 55 buildings, totaling 1,500,000 square feet. The campus total includes 13 residence halls, housing approximately 2500 undergraduate students. The land use analysis reveals an equal appropriation of surface parking and programmed open space, while maintaining a relatively high ratio of unprogrammed open space.

ROAD & SIDEWALKS 19 % PROGRAMMED OPEN SPACE 1 0 % PROGRAMMED OPEN SPACE 42 %

N

[) ,-, 100

050

260

•• ••

•• •• • •

23 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008 -

-

-

-

-

.

- -- -------�- - -- --

@

Floor Area Ratios A Planner's Dictionary defines FAR as the total floor area of all buildings or structures on a zoning lot divided by the total square footage of said lot. The Floor Area Ratio, or FAR, of a piece of property describes the relationship between the size of a lot and the amount of floor space it contains. For example, a 50' x 1 00' lot (5,000 square feet) with a single-story 50' x 50' building (2,500 square feet) has a floor area ratio of 0.5. If a building with the same size footprint had 4 stories, the FAR would increase to 2.00. FAR is a typical measure of a parcel's efficient use and often as a means to control density.

To determine the FAR for major campus areas, lot lines were drawn to include land associated with each building, including circulation and common areas. The results are shown on the accompanying diagram (left) .

Generally speaking, areas with a FAR of less than 1.0 typically do not use their parcels efficiently. The diagram on the left illustrates that the approximate overall campus density is low (.75) .

The existing University density figures suggest that some additional densification of the campus is possible while retaining the character of the campus landscape. The low existing densities shown suggest that overall, the "triangle" is capable of receiving slightly higher densities in the future. W ith proper planning, densities closer to 1.0 throughout the campus can be achieved successfully.

\'o \;:�

Cl

o· a :i

D

O o

•

•

__

Reaching a FAR as close to 1.0 as possible, in combination with a building height maximum, will ensure that the campus achieves efficient density while maintaining its residential character.

o

□

�

-

:�pus ve�e

..

•

Figure # 1 1 Existing Floor Area Ratio

24 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

- North West Quadrant 0.7 - North East Quadrant 0.7 - South West Quadrant 0.8 - South East Quadrant 0.8 Athletic Quadrant .007

f- o.:s f"l>J:!. ➔

<~/

Figure # 1 2 Floor Area Ratio Defined, Source: American Planning Association, A Planners Dictionary, 2004

..

Campus Grounds - Building Adjacency @

..• .

0

J

GJ

DOD I ~

~ ~

0

cP

c::,

C::J

0

Building Adjacency diagrams describe organizing principles, program relations, and connections that can help guide development within campus parameters.

This diagram illustrates that Longwood's campus possesses an overall balanced distribution of buildings and functions that is, an efficient adjacency.

0

!iii ~

•• •

.. ..

oO

D

0

O G

D

0 0

-

0

ooo

LI

. ,~

.11~

,

:

JlllllL

po . GJO 0

0

0 C

lJ e:i_ "'"' "'

I

f2-o o�� ,

Longwood Villa·

I

ents Residence ongwood Golf Cours

0

�

Academic & Support Housing Library

CD

Institutional Support . .

ure Building Adjacen

Student Union

Athletic / Recreation Food Service

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

25

® Campus Grounds - Facility Condition Index Reports 00

~

a u crj

bl) ~

.

FACILITY CONDITION INDEX (FCI) is a term used to describe the relative condition of

campus facilities in relation to the current replacement value (CRY) of a particular building.

r

FCI RANGE AND CONDITION RATINGS These condition ratings are found in Managing the Facilities Portfolio, published by The National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO). The ratings were developed considering only deferred maintenance and repair requirements, rather than cyclic maintenance and component renewal needs, in order to benchmark the current condition of facilities.

~

~

-~><

00

~

Cl)

.-0 ~

In an effort to systematically analyze their facilities portfolio, Longwood University contracted Carter & Burgess, Inc. and Applied Management Engineering, Inc. in 2007 to conduct an objective facility condition assessment of their facilities (see Appendix, Report 1) . The facilities condition assessment was accomplished through an on-site visual inspection of each building.

The goal of the inspections were to establish a baseline of current facility conditions and develop a ten year maintenance and repair plan without the influence of budgetary or operational restraints.

Detailed inspection reports were prepared for 42 separate buildings then provided for review. The following scale was used in evaluating all campus facilities.

Under .05 (5%) = Good Between .05 (5%) and . 10 ( 10%) = Fair Over . 10 ( 10%) = Poor The Existing Facilities Assessment report documented the physical condition for 43 of the College's existing buildings both on and off campus. The 43 buildings totaled 1,493, 188 square feet, with a total current replacement value of $346.5 million and an overall facility condition index (FCI) of 10%, a range representing fair overall condition. Fifteen buildings had FCI's of .5% or less, the range considered representative of a building in good condition. Nine facilities ranged between 5-10%, in the fair category. All other buildings had FCI's in excess of 10%. See Appendix, Report 1 for complete descriptions and details.

27%Poo

3 1 % Fair

26 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Campus Grounds - Pedestrian Circulation EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION At present, the main campus has an extensive network of internal sidewalks and paths that are well utilized. The addition of Brock Commons provided the University with a major north-south pedestrian spine and gathering place. Geocoded results (see Figure # 14) show a large number of students residing in areas immediately north and east of main campus, as well as a significant number of faculty members residing within walking distance in the neighborhoods west of campus. In addition, new housing developments such as the Mid-Town Square and Lancer Park are within walking distance to campus (the latter development's proximity will improve upon completion of the proposed pedestrian bridge connecting it to Grove Street). The campus overall is very walkable - a pedestrian can easily walk throughout the entire campus in less than 10 minutes.

Pedestrian access to campus is generally good from the north. In the area north of High Street, off-campus housing density is quite high, and the topography fairly flat, enabling pedestrians to walk to campus easily.

The same can be said in regards to the neighborhoods west of campus; however, Griffin Boulevard does not have appropriate pedestrian crossings (those that are present are unsafe due to design issues and excessive vehicles speeds), and there is no sidewalk on the western side of the street. Many students and faculty members park in surface lots located along the northern end of Griffin Boulevard; however, pedestrian access to campus from those lots is poor.

Main student concentrations

Facu lty/Staff concentration

CJ

9:�

I

Campus core

--..

j.-\ \

,

f

�\ l �

(''?1,,,,

't>c

_QJ�_

Figure # 14, Geocoded Address s of Campus Population: The Town � f Farmville

'econdary

,._ e # 15, Ex·Jti Pe<,if�tt:iall\i Circ�la

o

_ _._,k ) M· /f' mute

..-,,::,. ,.____, 56 - <--�-'1 00� :feet___ : .I .f.)

,.

,.

{

• Note: Large student concentrations at L ancer Park, Sunchase Complex, and Longwood Village not shown

- 30

-1

5

• commuter stuoents - Employees 0

mes

3

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

27

Campus Grounds - Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian connections from the Mid-Town Square and areas east of campus are also generally poor. There are insufficient pedestrian crossings along South Main Street, and those that do exist are improperly designed. Furthermore, there are no direct access points from the Mid-Town Square to campus. Due to a lack of suitable crossings, students tend to use the Bank of America's drive-through facility to cut across South Main Street to Venable Street from the Mid-Town Square. However, Venable Street itself constitutes a barrier - pedestrians are either forced to walk to Madison Street or use a gate and walk through the tennis courts on their way to the main campus.

Commuters who park in Vernon Street and Landings South parking lots not only have to deal with severe upward grading when walking to campus on Putney Street, but also with misaligned crosswalks at the intersection of South Main and Redford Streets. Presently these crossings do not line up with curbs or offer the shortest crossing distance. Within campus, on the eastern side, Spruce Street traffic and parking cause safety concerns due to a large number of pedestrians coming in and out of Curry/Frazer Halls. Residents of the halls must also navigate through extensive vehicle traffic while crossing East Redford Street on their way to the northern end of campus.

This path, in front of the underground garage, does not provide a dedicated, safe or convenient crosswalk for pedestrians.

Pedestrian connections from the western side of campus are generally inadequate. Griffin Street lacks a sufficient number of safe pedestrian crossings and sidewalks around most of its western edge. The corner of High Street and Griffin Boulevard is not designed with pedestrians in mind. Currently, vehicles use the southeastern curb of the intersection as a shortcut, where pedestrians should be waiting to cross the street. A physical barrier is needed to prevent the vehicles from doing so. Lastly, the stop sign at the intersection of Race and Redford Streets is often blocked by parked vehicles along the eastern side of Race Street, endangering pedestrians and motorists alike.

Pedestrian access to the campus from the south is also generally poor, although pedestrian activity in the area is currently relatively low. South Main Street has sidewalks on both sides of the street, but pedestrian crossings are few and far between.

Griffin Boulevard lacks sidewalks on its western edge from north

28 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Figure # 1 6 Pedestrian Conflicts West

Fi ure # 17 Pedestrian Conflicts East

.,trl

Large number of students walking from Curry/Frazer to Dining Hall must cross Redford St in front of garage

9'I

• •

....

Legend : ••

••

___

•• Major pedestrian / vehicle •• conflict points

___,,...__...._....

1 ,000 feet

of Chambers Street to the South Main Street intersection, and there are no sidewalks along the eastern side of Griffin Boulevard from Barrow Street to South Main Street. Thus, students walking to Southgate Shopping Center are forced to either walk on the side of the road or cut across the ball fields to get to the shopping center. As the southern part of campus continues to

·'

Crosswalks at South Main and Redford streets do not line up with curbs or offe r shortest crossing di.stance

-•

Sank of America parking lot is used by students as a shortcut

Legend

• • ••• Major pedestrian / vehicle

: ••

••

♦- conflict points

1 ,000 feet �__....,,-

develop and increase in residential and institutional density, more attention to pedestrian connections and crossings in this area will be needed. The missing links in the pedestrian network and points where pedestrian/vehicular conflicts persist are shown in Figures 1 6 and 1 7.

Campus Grounds - Green Space Existing green and open spaces can be found throughout the main campus.

The land use analysis revealed over one half of the campus is currently dedicated to open green space. The physical environment of the campus and the landscape, in particular - makes a powerful first, and lasting, impression and can play a key role in recruiting and retaining students, faculty, and staff. In undertaking the comprehensive campus master plan, Longwood confirms its commitment to creating a collegial. and attractive environment that supports the university's mission, and acknowledges the importance ofthe landscape in giving order and continuity to the campus.

I

'-"'.!

'-6 O

C

0

0 ~

0

••

C,

0

•

400

0

0

c:::>

'L o,

Fa CJ

..• •

r ~JI ✓

~

7J

nm,_ ---w

lk:

d Figure # 18, Green Space

29 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Campus Grounds - Vehicular Circulation & Parking EXISTING STREET NETWORK

EXISTING VEHICULAR ISSUES

Farmville's street pattern is fairly complex, with a typical grid network downtown and in the neighborhoods west of the Longwood Universi ty campus (albeit not following east-west or north-south direction) , and larger suburban-style blocks throughout most of the area (Figure # 1 9) . Within and near campus, all streets are two-lane, with the exception of South Main Street (U.S. Route 1 5), which carries two lanes of traffic in each direction. In addition, Venable Street traffic is one-way in the southbound direction. Several streets on campus continue the grid pattern existent west of campus, but the pattern is broken by pedestrianized Brock Commons dividing Madison and Franklin Streets, and by an underground garage that divides Redford Street in two. Thus, vehicular traffic through campus is very limited in the east-west direction.

In general, issues of traffic congestion and delay appear to be relatively minor. The existing streets provide adequate traffic flow. The only significant delays are associated with rush hour traffic heading west onto South Main Street from Redford Street. However, some design flaws result in traffic circulation issues that need to be addressed (see Figure # 1 9). The issues are described below:

The campus has a small footprint and is essentially bounded by: High Street at its northern edge; Griffin Blvd. at the western edge; South Main and Venable Street at the eastern edge; and South Main Street extending along the southern edge of campus.

At present, South Main Street, Griffin Boulevard and High Street define the core campus area, but none of these roadways define a principal entrance way to campus. In terms of one internal roadway that serves as an obvious entrance way to campus, East Redford Street could be perceived to fulfill that role, with its textured brick surface and heavily landscaped median and planting strips (see image below) . It would be beneficial if all internal campus streets received a makeover similar to this section of Redford Street.

1 . Difficult vehicular access to Lancer Park, despite its relatively close proximity to campus.

2. High Street is used by buses as passenger drop-off point, creating traffic back-ups and compromising pedestrian safe ty.

3. The stop sign located at the T-j unction of Redford and Pine streets is not visible to vehicles approaching the intersection northbound on Race Street. The sign's visibility is impaired by vehicles parked on the eastern side of Race Street.

4. Excessive traffic congestion is experienced by motorists traveling eastbound on Madison Street and attempting to turn left onto South Main Street.

5. Sawdust truck traffic on Madison Street is a concern - up to four delivery trucks a day travel to and from the heating plant.

6. Vehicles entering South Main Street from Venable Street create a traffic hazard due to sharp angles and low visibility.

7. Trucks and buses use the eastern end of Redford Street as a turnaround area, creating an unsafe environment for pedestrians.

General Issues • Inadequate vehicular wayfinding on and off-campus.

• Speeding along Griffin Boulevard and Venable, Wynne, and Race streets.

Figure # 1 9, Existing Campus Vehicular Circulation

30

~

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Campus Grounds - Vehicular Circulation and Parking

.... ....

EXISTING PARKING DEMAND

The existing parking spaces (2,252) are dose to full on a typical day (although surface lots surrounding Wynne Street usually have some available parking) . It should also be noted than on an average day, about 1 8 vehicles are ticketed for either parking illegally or parking without decals on campus property. A number of students and facul ty/staff members also tend to park in the town's downtown parking lots as those lots are free and often under utilized during the day. Considering the 95 percent occupancy, total current demand is estimated at approximately 2,350 spaces.

~

(D

m ;>< . ~· ~ ~

("""'!o.

In the academic year 2007-2008, there were 2,439 decals sold (data valid as of 1 0/2/2007) . These decals include

1 75 Lancer Park permits and 45 freshman permits for freshmen allowed to park in the lot on South Main Street.

Thus, excluding Lancer Park's permits, the number of decals sold on main campus was 2,264, which roughly equals the number of actual parking spaces available on campus. However, decals sales do not account for damaged, lost, or replaced permits. Approximately 50 parking decals fall into this category. The following is a breakdown of decal allocation for the 2007 /2008 academic year: • Facul ty/Staff

702

• Resident Students

9 1 9 (including Freshman exceptions)

(IQ

n ~

.§ $'.:=

• Commuting Students 8 1 8

Total

~

00

PARKING DECALS ISSUED

....~

®

00

2,439

EXISTING PARKING: ISSUES

Longwood Universi ty currently has a sufficient supply of parking spaces to meet the existing demand. However, the spaces seem to be used inefficiently; in the area roughly bordered by Griffin Boulevard, High Street, Venable/South Main Street and Franklin Street, the demand barely meets supply since lots located there are often full. The lots located outside the main core of the campus, including lots west of Griffin Boulevard and south of Franklin Street (particularly Wynne Drive lots) are often under utilized since the demand for spaces in that area is generally lower than supply. This exemplifies the fact that proximi ty to the final destination does matter to drivers looking for a parking spot. In fact, the commuters tend to refer to the issued parking permits as 'hunting' permits. The fact that commuters would rather park dose to their destinations to avoid walking from parking lots located farther out also points out the need for a safer and more attractive pedestrian environment.

�====== Faculty/Staff Commuter Vi sitor Resi denti al Freshman

,

igure # Camprn;

xis g

31 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

@ Pedestrian Orientation The primary conflicts on campus are between vehicles and pedestrians. Illustrated in red on the diagram to the right (Figure # 2 1) are the principal areas of concern. In an effort to preserve and build upon Longwood's residential character these areas will be closely examined. Resolutions for these conflicts will appear in several differing types of strategies throughout this master plan. Concepts that will help address these issues are:

___ Ji 'il ---U

L __ -.JL_-_-_-,---:::=:;

• Improved wayfinding and signage • Appropriate crosswalk systems Proper hardscapes and sidewalks Properly scaled and maintained landscaping Decreased and controlled vehicular access Creation of new pedestrian paths Re-definition and improvement of existing pedestrian paths • Alternate modes ·of transportation

32 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

0.,

0

II

OG

D

.

0

I

~ ,..J'I

II

1.--,d.-

0

oooO (jl (1 0

~D

0 Do D

•• •• •• ••

•• •• •• •

•• •• •

Campus Grounds - Housing At the time of the new millennium, Longwood had a very traditional approach to housing. Eighty­ five percent of students lived in on-campus residence halls dating between 1 923 and 1 99 1. Over the past several years, the university has acquired more than 400 apartment style housing units in three complexes to the north, west, and south of campus. This arrangement presents unique challenges and opportunities. Within a very short time, these units have generated transportation, maintenance, security, parking, student life, recreation, and management issues.

The university is entrusted with defining solutions that advance and complement the traditional residential strategies, as well as the new village concept and a growing commuter student population. The following aspects need to be considered for student life residential planning: • The university uses a tiered approach to student living, i.e., freshmen live in on-campus residential halls, while many juniors and most seniors live off of the main campus in universi ty managed residential villages and unaffiliated housing;

• There needs to be strong visual, functional, and service links between the residential villages and the core campus;

• The university's learning/living philosophy is important in all types of student residential living;

• Maintaining/enhancing "community" is one of the most important aspects of the philosophy;

• Student living incorporates learning and recreation in the living environment, and;

• The Student Union and campus dining must be expanded to meet the increasing demands and needs of a growing number students who do not reside on the main campus.

•• • •• •

ARC Cunninghams Curry and Frazer French Stubbs Tabb (main) Wheeler Cox Longwood Landings

160 447 798 1 03 1 86 111 181 1 90 408

On and Off Campus Housing Total 3,126 beds

□

D' Q, : [J

0

0

D

D

Q � O D 0 D 0

Figure # 22, Existing Housing

Lancer Park

260

Longwood V illage

282

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

33

Campus Grounds - Recreation and Sports Facilities Campus Recreation provides fitness, wellness, recreational, competitive, and social opportunities to the Longwood University community. Over the past five years, Longwood has been transforming its athletic programs from NCAA Division II to Division I. Near term needs of the programs are being addressed through the enhancement and addition to the existing athletic facilities. The master plan should anticipate the needs of growing programs and future facility requirements.

The Health and Fitness Center, which opened in

August 2007, is a 75,000-square foot facility that includes a 7,300-square foot fitness center, two full-court gymnasiums, a multi-purpose gym, three group exercise rooms, two racquetball courts, a 30-foot climbing wall, and a one-eighth mile walking/jogging track. The fitness center has 40 pieces of cardiovascular equipment, 30 pieces of strength equipment, and free weights. As the University's first certified LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) building, the center is also the only "Gold" LEED certified Higher Education Building in V irginia, and the only "Gold" LEED certified recreation center in the entire south east.

Lancer Park Sports Complex, recently constructed at

the Lancer Park university residential community, will become a recreation and sports haven. The complex will include fields for rugby, lacrosse, soccer, flag football and softball; a jogging/ walking path with fitness stations; a Frisbee golf course; tennis courts; outdoor basketball courts; an indoor activities barn; and sites for wildlife viewing and nature hikes.

Willett Hall Complex includes a 3,000-seat gymnasium, weight-training laboratory, human performance laboratory,

34 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•

dance studio, pool, and a 500-seat natatorium. Willett Hall is home to the Longwood University men's and women's basketball teams.

Other University sport and recreation accommodations include 4 mapped outdoor jogging trails, numerous fields, including baseball, softball, field hockey, soccer, volleyball, basketball and tennis courts. Longwood also boasts a nine-hole golf course located one mile from campus.

Figure# 23, Existing Re~e~tion

...

Campus Grounds - Landscaping, Entrances, and Boundaries LANDSCAPING

BOUNDARIES

Open space and landscaping play an important role in establishing the campus image. The existing rolling campus topography is well-maintained and features varying types of landscaping. The most prominent open spaces are W heeler Mall - an open green, and Brock Commons - a landscaped pedestrian plaza along the north-south campus axis.

Specific edge conditions are also shown on this diagram, describing the ability or inability to make a distinction between town and university grounds. For the purposes of this document, an edge is defined as a perceived boundary such as a wall, building, or landscaping.

ENT RANCES AND GATEWAYS The dark blue stars and light blue diamonds in Figure 24 denote the existing vehicular signage and entryways to the campus. The campus edges are bounded by South Main Street, Griffin Boulevard, and High Street; however, a main entrance is not defined. Historically, High Street was the primary approach to campus, but with much of the campus' new development shifting southward, it is no longer the principal access. Today, High Street is the historical and architectural backbone of the campus, but is rarely utilized as a main entrance.

..• • .. i-tt

,.,

•

Pedestrian access should be signified by a gateway system or treatment of the landscaping, preferably with appropriately scaled signage. W hile the current conditions of the campus do not address this issue, the Master Plan will recommend strategies to establish and incorporate these gateway areas/ systems.

Pedestrian access should be denoted by a gateway system or landscaped areas, along with appropriate signage. The master plan will recommend strategies to establish and incorporate these gateways and areas.

The South Main/Redford Street intersection is the "functional" primary campus vehicular entrance; however, it does not present a visual sense of arrival at a university campus.

Griffin Boulevard has the potential to become a more important campus entry, but connectivity to the campus core is currently insufficient. Traffic calming techniques are also required to make the street and entrances more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly.

® ~

~ CD

m ~-

;><

The green lines delineate a natural or soft edge defined by trees, shrubs, building alignment, and continuity. This type of edge is the most attractive and desirable. It allows those looking both in and out of campus to enjoy uninterrupted views, while maintaining an implied yet still definitive boundary.

rJ;J.

~~ ~

(fq

n

The pink lines delineate an undefined edge, which contributes to a poor campus image and visual confusion.

~

The hard edge, depicted in purple, represents brick or other hard surface. This type of boundary might be perceived as harsh, uninviting, or even dangerous.

,§ ~

rJ;J.

*

Existing Vehicular Signage Undefined Edge

- Hard Edge

[J Q CJ , ., s _.JLL

Soft I Natural Edge Vehicular Entry C)

..

_O.-•

�

=�

\

f8

:· � 'l C

0

Figure #

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

35

Campus Grounds - Signage

In 2002 Longwood adopted a Graphic Identity Style Manual chat provided guidelines for recommended usage of the new symbol and logotype. These standards help Longwood University communicate in a clear and consistent voice chat reflects the reputation and goals of the institution. A similar set of standards should be implemented specifically for signage in relation to building, vehicular, and pedestrian applications.

A single gateway sign for the southern entry to campus is located along South Main Street south of Wynne Drive (see image bottom left) . Other gateway signs exist for the northern approaches to campus along High and Main Street; however, the entire length of Griffin Boulevard is devoid of signage.

36

Southern Enc

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Directional signs for motorists or pedestrians can be found both in and around campus. Vehicular signs are needed to provide clear instruction for the visitor in locating parking facilities, campus buildings, athletic and entertainment venues, visitor information, and the Admissions Office. The signage connecting the campus to the regional context could be further emphasized.

The existing maps on campus, such as the one placed at the north end Brock Commons (see image top left) are used to communicate the level of detail needed for adequate campus orientation and accessibility information. Updating will be required.

The building signage system for the campus is functional and consistent; however, changes to further the system's flexibility might be appropriate.

Refer to Appendix, Report 2 for a complete description of existing signage conditions.

Campus Infrastructure - Potable Water, Storm Water, and Sanitary Sewer Lines 00000

--QcJ QODG a • o 0

150

11 1 1 1 1 ■ ■ 11111 ■ ■ -

t_ - - - - - - -

o cr � � � • £ t0. 7!

o o9 °11

One major purpose of a campus master plan is to identify potential utility issues surrounding future construction projects or other physical changes. The project team reviewed the available information from both the university and the town of Farmville on the campus potable water, storm water, and sanitary sewer systems. While these utility systems appear to have adequate capacity for current use, certain sections contain pipes smaller than what is generally considered to be the present day minimum diameter (eight inches for water and sewer mains) .

Current building designs minimize water consumption and therefore sewage generation as much as possible. Nevertheless, utilities at the site of each new project should be verified and evaluated specifically for the anticipated load of that project, particularly for the flow of fire protection water. The university's potable water system has not been modeled sufficiently to allow a complete computation of future demands. However, certain sections are not as robust as they could be.

Potable Water - Storm Water

37 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Campus Infrastructure - Steam, Electrical, and Telecommunications STEAM Longwood University owns and operates a central steam heating system consisting of one heating plant and campus-wide steam distribution piping. A new heating plant is currently being constructed that will contain two biomass boilers with a combined capacity of approximately 40,000 pounds of steam per hour.

tJ

ca a:r

1 1

•

oO OG

,,

II

CJ l

D0

II

0

•

ELECTRICAL Dominion V irginia Power owns and maintains the electrical distribution system on the campus. The existing peak load of approximately 3,500 kw will ultimately increase to 5,500 kw at the completion of the planned expansion and construction projects.

Dominion V irginia Power has indicated that there are no foreseeable issues with providing the campus with the required additional power.

J

[?

.

II f/

f,i

I

The existing telecommunications and data systems are owned and maintained by the university.

Expansion of the existing system to support the future requirements should be in accordance with the procedures established by the university's Information and · Instructional Technology Services organization.

I

~g,,

s~ 1 50

0

'

" t... /

.-

11111 ■ ■ -

1 11111 ■ ■

-

•

!

150 _ JOO -

·--SCALE: 1 · - 300' - o· TELECOMMUNICATIONS

.... .... .... .... ..• ..

/J

'""'-....._j/ 1! (--........,

:

·tl/1 ____ _--...........:; {~:t .

Steam 1 • 1 Distribun n -·- - - - ~ E ectnca / r, r, \, LJJ Telecommunicatiorys,t::J/ .J ',~

-~

I

_n;:J O::jjo -~ -~-~

. O!

) I

fl.~b

1

- - ~ v___ ;j-iF·~;::.:_:::::';;_,_,-;_:::,-,:.:_:::,_il/=::::::::::11'~,;/~~:::::q':::::::-::::::::::::::.

"

1:_1 j1

\

\\ �:•�----,f Figure # 26, Existing InfrastructureSteam, Electrical and Telecommunications 6"-��,:-;f--;;;:;; ..il-�m,�����;�=,-:: ,......,..,._,,.._ .1,.

38 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•

The Institute for Teaching through Technology & Innovative Practices

Powhatan Center

Retail Merchants Association, Richmond

Hull Springs Farm

The Institute for Teaching through Technology & Innovative Practices (IT T IP), under the College of Education and Human Services of Longwood University, was created by the 1 999 General Assembly.

Its main founders were Longwood President Patricia Cormier and W W "Ted" Bennett Jr., a Halifax attorney who then represented the 60th district in the House of Delegates.

Longwood University and the Powhatan County Public Schools have formalized a partnership in which Longwood graduate courses will be offered at Powhatan High School.

Longwood University offers a Masters of Business Administration (with a concentration in retail management) in partnership with the Richmond, Virginia, Retail Merchants Association (RMA).

Classes are held both at Longwood and in space leased from the RMA at their office, 510 1 Monument Avenue, Richmond.

Hull Springs Farm is a 638 acre farm owned by the Longwood University Foundation and located in Westmoreland County on Virginia's Northern Neck.

The long-term concept for the farm is focused on evolving into an environmental education and best practices demonstration center. Current activities include shoreline preservation and protection, refining its forest stewardship plan, development of conservation easements, and wetlands restoration.

The IT T IP researches and develops effective technology-integrated instructional strategies and models that are proven to be successful. Current research on instructional strategies include the use of asynchronous learning, video conferencing, digital video, and personal digital assistants. Headquartered in South Boston, the Institute serves primarily 25 public school divisions extending from Patrick County eastward to the city of Franklin and as far north as Buckingham County and Colonial Heights. It works closely with, and is the fiscal and administrative agent for, the Southside Virginia Regional Technology Consortium (SVRTC).

Assistance for school divisions include: • Professional development in content areas • Integration of technology applications in instruction • Implementation of video conferencing • Demonstration of research based instructional practices • Special career and technical education projects for students

In May of 2005 at Powhatan High School, Longwood President Dr. Patricia Cormier and Dr. Margaret Meara, superintendent of the Powhatan schools, signed an agreement officially establishing the Longwood Powhatan Center.

Longwood began partnering with the Powhatan schools in 2001 to provide professional development in reading for teachers in that school division. Dr. Barbara Chesler, who then directed the Literacy and Culture (Reading Specialist) program, led many of those classes and worked closely with Powhatan school officials to identify and meet the professional development needs of teachers and administrators.

@ The Existing Campus

Remote Facilities

Courses are taught at the Longwood Powhatan Center from the programs of Literacy and Culture, Special Education, Educational Leadership, and Elementary Education, as well as foundational courses for initial teacher licensure for those with a bachelor's degree but not a teacher's license.

39

~

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•

•

•• •• •• •• •

•• •• •• •• •

•

• • • .,_�-------------------------------------• • • • Future Campus Requirements and Preferences • • • • • • • • • •

-------•

• • • • • • • • •

V

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

41

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences @

The Academic Program OVERVIEW

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN NURSING

MBA PROGRAMS

Founded in 1839, Longwood University is an institution of higher learning dedicated to the development of citizen leaders who are prepared to make positive contributions to the common good of society. Building upon its strong foundation in the liberal arts and sciences, the institution provides an environment in which exceptional teaching fosters student learning, scholarship, and achievement. As the only four-year public institution in south central Virginia, Longwood serves as a catalyst for regional prosperity and advancement.

Longwood University, in partnership with Southside Community Hospital, conducted a study to determine the feasibility of establishing a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) program at the University.

Longwood University is also currently meeting a specific regional need with its MBA in Retailing, which was developed at the request of the Richmond Retail Merchants Association.

Additionally, the University has added two additional MBA programs - one in accounting and one in general business.

Longwood University offers more than 100 majors, minors, and concentrations through its various academic programs. Given its historical roots, Longwood University enjoys an enviable reputation for teacher preparation. The culture of excellence has expanded throughout the university with strong programs in the liberal arts, sciences, business, professional, and pre-professional areas.

Today, this coeducational, comprehensive state university has an enrollment of more than 4,800 students. It is comprised of three separate colleges: the Cook­ Cole College of Arts and Sciences, the College of Business and Economics, and the College of Education and Human Services; and a graduate division offering programs in business administration, communication sciences and disorders, education, English, and sociology.

The future requirement for space and facilities supporting academic programs is based on the following two factors: 1. The projected growth of student enrollment to 5,600 undergraduate and 500 graduate students in 2020.

2. The new Bachelor of Science in Nursing program, which will commence in fall 2009.

42

I)

•• •

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

As a result of the study, a project to renovate the second floor of Stevens Hall for this program is under consideration by the current legislative budget session and a request for proposals has been issued.

The nursing program will commence in fall 2009 with an initial class of 35 students. A new class of 35 students will be added in each of the next three years, resulting in 120 full time students. Thirty students will graduate each spring beginning in May 20 13 and each year thereafter.

Classes in Stevens Hall will begin in fall 2010.

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE A new major in environmental science was approved by the Board of Visitors in December 2008. The program will be part of the Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences within the Cook-Cole College of Arts and Sciences.

ADDITIONAL EFFORTS Longwood University intends on increasing the number of online courses offered at both the undergraduate and graduate level.

OBJECTIVES

DEFINITIONS

SPACE NEEDS PROCESS

• Reflect a true picture of existing physical assets

ASF : Assignable Square Feet

Data Collection

• Portray optimum space needs by functional area at target enrollment

• Usable space assigned to a program

• Fall 2006 Facilities Inventory

- Analyze the difference between the above from a quantitative perspective

• Measured from inside wall to inside wall

• Fall 2006 Course Data

• Strategize the physical response to the planning objectives as suggested by the space needs outcomes

• Excludes public restrooms, elevator area, stair wells, egress corridors, main circulation paths, mechanical/ electrical/plumbing spaces, and structural areas

• Fall 2006 Staffing File

• Fall 2006 Enrollments

Work Sessions with Longwood Personnel

• Discussed programs and instructional methodology

PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

• Validated data elements

• Facilities inventory includes all ASF on campus belonging to Longwood except residential housing

GSF: Gross Square Feet

• All space within a building's footprint • Space categories

Classroom and Laboratory Utilization Rates

University-wide Space Needs Analysis by Space Category

• Existing and projected student enrollment provided by Longwood

College/Unit Space Needs Analysis by Space Category

'4'4'

• Existing enrollment is current student headcount (undergraduate and graduate students)

• Defined according to Space Use Code

Designation and departmental/unit assignment

Space Use Codes

• Defined per The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Postsecondary Education Facilities Inventory and Classification Manual . FTE - Full Time Equivalent

• Projection is a total enrollment of 6 1 00 students (5,600 undergraduate and 500 graduate students)

. BY - Base Year

• Facul ty projections were calculated based on Longwood's stated faculty to student ratio of 1 to 22

• Quantitative rather than Qualitative

- Analysis focuses on amount of space rather than aesthetics of space

. TY - Target Year

• Space reallocation currently in progress . Anticipated construction projects with approved funding (e.g. Bedford Hall) are included in the target year space inventory

. Anticipated construction projects without approved funding (e.g.

/CONVERSION

FACILITIES

S PACE 1 0 %

0%

D I N I NG S E RVICES 6%

C LASSROOMS &

TEACHI G OPEN L A BORATORIES

& S ERV ICE 2 %

�

S TUDENT

1%

ACADEMIC OFFICES &

S E RV I C E 8 % A T H LETICS

PLANT 3 %

J

A S S E M BLY & E X H I B I T 3%

S ERVICE J 0 % L IBRARY

D E PARTMENT

1 2%

S PA C E 4%

Alumni Bed & Breakfast Center for Visual Arts Residence Life ASF=Assignable Square Feet

•

P HYSICAL

-

RECREATION __j

1 2%

ASF 53,679 39,343 1 1 ,992 3,922 46,354 55,843 25,045 68,562 1 8,685 1 6,871 66,480 50,494 2 1 ,276 32,783 1 ,756 58,500

• &a,,1,11i1mmwn,,;�--

9%

• '

the target year space inventory

I N ACTIVE

H EALTH

-

. Temporary trailers and South Tabb building have been removed from

STUDENT

Classroom & Services Teaching Laboratories & Services Open Laboratories & Services Research Laboratories Academic Offices & Services Administrative Offices & Service Other Department Space Library Assembly & Exhibit Physical Plant Recreation Physical Education/Athletics Student Union Dining Services Student Health Facilities Inactive/Conservation Space

i

Technology Center) are not included in the target year space inventory

Space Category

Existing Space By Category Figure # 27

• Analysis considers future space use

Table # 27. 1

4 , 1 48 22, 1 65 4 1 6, 1 1 7

-

43

(I

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

(8 Future Campus Requirements and Preferences

Space Needs Analysis - Overview

4, 01 2

Total Undergraduate Student Headcount Total Graduate Student Headcount

(Decrease)

/4, Cha nge

2, 088

52%

0

·1",1tt t1 ,~,

Tota l Student Hea dcount Student Headcount

l nn<·a.,c-/

...

1

S tudent E n rol l ment Summa ry ■ Ca mpuswide

Fall Ta rge t 200(> E nrol l ment

_c.:n m

In an effort to maintain Longwood's student focused character and culture, the administration has set a maximum enrollment projection of 6 1 00 undergraduate and graduate students by the year 2020 . A typical assumption in making facul ty and staff projections is to maintain a standard ratio based on the student enrollment.

Table # 28. 1

ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS • Provided by the university

• Percentage increase calculated by consultant

Fall Enrollment Projections

F a c u l ty /Staff • Ca mpusw i<lc

2006 E nr ol l ment

Faculty Headcount Staff Headcount

6,000

Ta rge t

ln cn'aw/ ( O<.• uea.;<.•l

t

7,000

5,000

Tota l

4,000

Table # 28.2

3,000

FACULTY/STAFF PROJECTIONS

233

520

277 619

44

752

896

1 44

99

• Calculated by consultant relative to enrollment mcrease

1 ,000

■ Undergraduate

llj..

I

t

i

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences

® Space Needs Analysis - Student Enrollment, Faculty, and Staff Proj ections

Figure # 28

44

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2 008

�

�

---------------------__________;

Space l~eeds Analysis - Space Projections AN INTRODUCTION TO SCHEY

GUIDELINES

The State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) is the Commonwealth's coordinating body for higher education. SCHEV was established by the Governor and General Assembly in 1956. Then as now, their mission, which is outlined in the Code of Virginia, is "to promote the development of an educationally and economically sound, vigorous, progressive, and coordinated system of higher education" in Virginia.

Classroom (SCHEV) • 17 ASF at 40 Weekly Room Hour (WRH) at 70% SSO = 0.5 ASF per Weekly Student Contact Hour (WSCH)

Student Union • 10 ASF per student headcount for student union

Teaching Laboratories (SCHEV) • 24 WRH at 75% Student Station Occupancy (SSO), varied ASF by discipline

Athletics • Percent growth over guideline

Open Laboratories • 3 ASF per student headcount

Assembly and Exhibit -A core of 27,450 ASF for an institution with active fine arts and music programs plus an additional allocation for every student over 5,000

To fulfill their mission, SCHEV makes higher education public policy recommendations to the Governor and General Assembly in such areas as capital and operating budget planning, enrollment projections, institutional technology needs, and student financial aid. SCHEV administers a variety of educational programs that benefit students, faculty, parents, and taxpayers. SCHEV serves as a catalyst to promote greater access, quality, affordability, and accountability throughout the system. SCHEV also helps policy makers, college administrators, and other concerned leaders work cooperatively and constructively to advance educational excellence.

Research Laboratories •SCHEV requires research space to be generated as ASF per research dollars expended • Calculated based on percentatge of faculty performing research, with an allocation for capstone Academic Office • Based on employee type plus an allocation for service and office conference space

• .3 ASF per student headcount for student health facilities

Physical Plant • 5% of all existing non-physical plant space excluding residential space in the base year, but inclusive of inactive/conversion space • 5% of all non-physical plant guideline space excluding residential space, but inclusive of inactive/conversion space Other Administrative Department Space . 3 ASF per student headcount

Other Academic Department Space • 3.5 ASF per student headcount Administrative Office • Based on employee type plus an allocation for service and office conference space Library •Allocation for stacks, support space, library staff, study areas, and lounge space Physical Education/Athletics • 15 ASF per student headcount Recreation •Allocation of29,000 ASF for up to 1,000 students plus additional space for every student over 1,000

45 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

GREATEST DEFICITS

Space Needs Analysis by Colle�e/Unit

Summary: 6, 1 00 Projected Student Enrollment

I

I

• Cook-Cole College of Arts & Sciences

.

I

• College of Education & Human Services

Fall 2006 Student Headcount = 4,012 Staff Headcount = 753

• Library • Facilities Management & Real Property • Physical Education/Athletics • Student Union • Food Service

ADDITIONAL AVAILIBLE SPACE • 58,500 ASF of Inactive/Conversion space is available for reuse (Table 27.2)

Existing ASF

Guideline ASF

Surplus/ (Deficit)

99, 1 I O 1 1 ,892 1 9,038 1 ,504 22,37 1 53,679 68,562 2 76, 156

1 1 0,3 1 3 1 2,272 26,370 1 ,680 0 32,363 7 1 ,550 254,548

( 1 1 ,203) (380) (7,332) ( 1 76) 22,3 7 1 2 1 ,3 l 6 (2,988) 21, 608

Academic Affairs Administration & Finance Facilities Management & Real Property Inactive/Conversion Support Information & Instructional Technology Office of the President Student Affairs University Advancement Dining Services Health Care Facilities Physical Education/Athletics Student Union Administrative Subtotal

1 0,760 20,578 22,923 36, 1 29 8,3 1 7 6,448 77,730 6,235 32,783 1 ,756 50,494 2 1 ,276 295, 429

1 3,078 2 1 ,999 54,3 1 8 0 1 I ,205 7,063 64,323 4,850 38,5 1 0 l ,204 60, 1 80 40, 1 20 316, 850

(2,3 1 8)

( 1 ,42 1 ) (3 1 ,395) 36, 1 29 (2,888) (6 1 5) 1 3,407 1 ,385 (5,727) 552 (9,686) ( I 8,844) (21, 421)

TOTAL

571,585

571,398

187

Alumni Bed & Breakfast Centerfor the Visual Arts ASF = Assignable Square Feet Centerfor Visual Arts

4, 148 22, 165

COLLEGE/UNIT Cook-Cole College ofArts & Sciences College of Business & Economics College of Education & Human Services Graduate & Onl ine Studies Inactive/Conversion - Academic Classroom & Services Library Academic Subtotal Administrative

Table # 27.2, Space Requirements

by College / Unit

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Percent Surplus/ (Deficit)

Target Enrollment Student Headcount = 6,100 Staff Headcount = 896

Percent Surplus/ (Deficit)

Existing ASF

Guideline ASF

Surplus/ (Deficit)

( 1 1 %) (3%) (39%) ( 1 2%) NIA 40% (4%)

1 27,487 1 1 ,892 1 9,038 1 ,504 22,3 7 1 55,029 68,562 305, 883

1 44,00 1 1 4,722 34,036 1 ,830 0 48,456 94,830 33 7, 875

( 1 6,5 1 4) (2,830) ( 1 4,998) (3 26) 22,3 7 1 6,573 (26,268) (31, 992)

( 1 3%) (24%) (79%) (22%) NIA 1 2% (38%)

(22%) (7%) ( 1 37%) NIA (35%) ( 1 0%) 1 7% 22% ( 1 7%) 31% ( 1 9%) (89%)

1 0,760 20,578 22,923 36, 1 29 8,3 1 7 6,448 77,730 6,235 32,783 1 ,756 45,895 2 1 ,276 290, 830

1 6,896 28,526 6 1 ,907 0 1 3,96 1 8, 1 46 77,306 5,490 57,900 1 ,830 9 1 ,500 6 1 ,000 424, 462

(6, 1 36) (7,948) (38,984) 36, 1 29 (5,644) ( 1 ,698) 424 745 (25, 1 1 7) (74) (45,605) (39,724) (133, 632)

(57%) (39%) ( 1 70%) NIA (68%) (26%) 1% 1 2% (77%) (4%) (99%) ( 1 87%)

596,713

762,337

(165,624)

I

Academic '

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences @

I)

46

Space Needs Analysis - Academic and Administrative Space Requirements by Division

4, 1 48 22, 1 65

SUPPORT SPACE

Administrative Offices: • increase correlated to the increase in number of staff and administrative personnel

Space Needs Analysis by Space Category Support Space

Fall 2006

Target Enrollment

Student Headcount = 6,100

Student Headcount = 4,012 Staff Headcount = 753

. ,

SPACE CATEGORY

Existing ASF

Guideline ASF

Surplus/ ( Deficit)

Staff Headcount = 896

Percent Surplus/ (Deficit)

Existing ASF

Guideline ASF

Surplus/ (Deficit)

Percent Surplus/ (Deficit)

Administrative Offices & Service Library Recreation Physical Education/Athletics Assembly & Exhibit Student Union Physical Plant Other Administrative Dept Space Health Care Facilities Dining Services Inactive/Conversion - Support Space Support Space Subtotal

55,843 68,562 66,480 50,494

1 8,685 2 1 ,276 1 6,871 1 1 ,408 1 ,756 32,783 36, 1 29 380,287

66,440 7 1 ,550 44,560 60, 1 80 27,450 40,1 20 50,001 1 2,036 1 ,204 38,5 1 0 0 412, 051

( 1 0,597) (2,988) 2 1 ,920 (9,686) (8,765) ( 1 8,844) (33, 1 30) (628) 552 (5,727) 36, 1 29 (31, 764)

55,843 68,562 66,480 45,895 20,785 2 1 ,276 1 6,87 1 1 1 ,408 1 ,756 32,783 36, 1 29 377, 788

( 1 9%) (4%) 33% ( 1 9%) (47%) (89%) ( 1 96%) (6%) 31% ( 1 7%) NIA

78,555 94,830 55,000 9 1 ,500 27,45 1 6 1 ,000 56,504 1 8,300 1 ,830 57,900 0 542, 870

(22,7 1 2) (26,268) 1 1 ,480 (45,605) (6,666) (39,724) (39,633) (6,892) (74) (25, 1 1 7) 36, 1 29 (165, 082)

(4 1 %) (38%) 1 7% (99%) (32%) ( 1 87%) (235%) (60%) (4%) (77%)

NIA

Space Needs Analysis by Space Category

2 1 ,3 1 6 7,4 1 0 (45) (9,984) (8,7 1 1 ) (406) 22,371 31, 951

40% 1 9% 0% (255%) ( 1 9%) (3%)

NIA

J

I

32,363 3 1 ,933 1 2,037 1 3,906 55,065 1 4,043 0 159, 347

Percent Surplus/ (Deficit)

•

53,679 39,343 1 1 ,992 3,922 46,354 1 3,637 22,371 1 91,298

r

Classroom & Service Teaching Laboratories & Service Open Laboratories & Service Research Laboratories & Service Academic Offices & Service Other Academic Dept Space Inactive/Conversion - Academic Space Academic Space Subtotal

Surplus/ (Deficit)

~

Academic Space

Gu ideline ASF

-

SPACE CATEGORY

Existing ASF

Ta rget Enrollment Student Headcount = 6,100 Staff Headcount = 896

•

Fall 2006 Student Headcount = 4,012 Staff Headcount = 753

Existing ASF

Guideline ASF

Surplus/ (Deficit)

55,029 58, 1 05 1 4,092 5,422 46,954 1 6,952 22,371 218, 925

48,456 47,459 1 8,30 1 1 9,329 64,570 2 1 ,352 0 219,467

6,573 1 0,646 (4,209) ( 1 3,907) ( 1 7,6 1 6) (4,400) 22,371 (542)

Recreation: .includes Iler Hall (:::: 12,000 ASF) Student Union: • additional space required for student club offices, meeting areas, food service, expanded post office, etc.

Physical Plant: • TY existing does not include proposed physical plant building • Inactive/Conversion - Support Space: Blackwell Hall

ACADEMIC SPACE

Classrooms: • surplus results in part from lower use of existing space than guideline expectations; does not consider any revision of classroom sizes

Teaching Laboratories: .base year includes Science Center; target year includes additional space for the arts (Bedford Hall addition).

Open Laboratories: .additional spaces such as general access computer laboratories, music practice rooms, testing/tutoring (academic support areas, collaborative learning spaces)

Academic SEace

-

...... ............ ,., ...

Support Space

Library: • increase for additional reader stations and collection space

Percent Surplus/ (Deficit)

1 2% 1 8% (30%) (256%) (38%) (26%)

NIA

Research Laboratories: • increase to provide space for Education and Sr.ecial Education, Mathematics and Computer Science, Natural Sciences, and Psychology faculty with an allocation for undergraduate capstone experience Academic Offices: • increase correlated to the increase in number of faculty and support personnel; need for additional office support space and conference rooms Other Academic Space: • includes such space as lounge areas, meeting rooms, greenhouse space, academic media production, etc.

Inactive/Conversion: • Acad Space: Stevens Hall and some space in McCorkle and Jeffers Halls

Table # 27.3, Space Requirements by Category

47

@l

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

(8 Future Campus Requirements and Preferences

.il t _._

Space Needs Analysis - Support and Academic Requirements

-~

• •

I

I

I

l

J

I

-

I

I

•

• •

•

• • •

-

•

"

I

I

,_

11.

-- -·

• •

'

I

I

I .

--

---

-

• ·· -

•

,I

•

I

•

I

·• -

• • • • •

- - · ---+-- -

I

I

I

•

-

I

.

•

.

•

·- 1r

•

-

-·-

- - -+- ,___ '

I

,___

I"-

::-,

I

4-

I

I

.J. -

•

I

-

•

!

i

-

I

•

• •

-

·~

-

I

· - - --

t

- -.

•

• •

~-

--

--- ---.

--

•

• •

--

~

-

,.

• •

;

-

- -

•

-

-- - .L ,__

'

I

-

-~ .....

I

•

~

I

-

•

•

•

-- -

•

----t"•;

• • • •

I

,-=

'-- ~

-

•

•

-

• • •

- -

• •

• •

I

-- -- -

-

-

j_

--

• •

•

--

• •

- - - - - - - ,- -

•

•

-

-= -

'

•

•

-

-~

I

I--- -

.. I

....

- . ....

• • • •

--

-.!

• • • • •

-;-"

I

-

I

·-

•

•

-

-

•

,_

•

--

,_

I--•

--

-

--··

•

- -. ---

~

--•

•

•

•

--

• '!"

.

I

I

- --

.

•

--

•~

·..::.:..._

-

!

7 •

,- ,- ,__

,_ f - · ·

•

•

•

,_ -

-

-

~

• •

•

•

...

- --- . ·- - -

-

• • • •

.·~_.... . .

--

" - ,__

-,___ '

-

-~ -

•

·~

•

•

•

!

--·•

- ,- ,__

I

--

-

- - -- - -

t

l

-

•

• • •

•

•

1

~

[I

1 •

~

:

• • •

• •

•

-

·-

-

,-.

I

I

• •

•

• • •

--

I

-- ......

1--

... - I

• •

·1

I

.I 'i

-

•

•

I

•

• • • •

•

-1

•

• • • •

• • •

I

II

i

~~ ~

• • • • •

~

. ~,- ,_

•

~

~

•

-

•

•

-- -

• •

•

I

•

L ,I

• • •

t • •

-

+. -

.r .

• •

,t-

I

• •

• •

I

-

• •

--

• • •

•

•• •

• •

--

-

:

- ---

• • •

•

•

• •

•

• • •

•

Cumb. Police Stu dent LU Fou ndation BrdSu p Chief Success Brd of Directors

I

- --

•

·-

-----

-

•

•

-- -

·- ·-

•

I

I

•

• • • • • •

-"• -

-

-

-

• • • • •

•

.

• • • • • ••

•

1 I

~

r

I

-

•

.;.

CCTV

• I

Increase. Lig_hting__

•

I

.

,I

- -- .. -

I

I

I I

,_ ....... ~

--

I

- -

-

-

-

Renovate & Increase Housing Maintain & Uodate Golf Course

.L , -

I

IT Buildina Additional Food Services Increase Library Size

---

I

-.

•

Entertainment Center Governors' School

• • • •

•

•

1-~

-

- -

I

,,~ -

I

I

Outdoor Performance Venue Flexible 200-500.Assembly Convocation Center

l

•

-

• •

I

• • • • •

~

'::amous Gatewavs Creation of Main Entrance Varying Scales of Identifying Markers

So ecialized Facilities One Stop Shop Student Services Student Union

-

•

'.

I

L

I I~

• •

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

e-1.~

t

••

~

I

• • •

�ommunity Con nections Way Finding Improvements Initiative to facilitate increased PR

Table # 27.4, Issue Identifying Matrix

•

•

-·

lj

l] I'.

-

- J

Historic Preservation Definition of Campus Boundaries Maintain Small Campus Atmosphere Recommended Design Guidelines Incorporate Sustainability

I

-~

•

•

Maintain & Create Additional Outdoor Rooms & Furniture Public Art

[I

I

•

'.

II

Pede8btan Circulation Pedestrian Crouwalm/ Traffic Calming Bice, Skal8boad Palha / SIDraae Reallocalion of wll!T....... Slreets

Campus Identity

• •

••

1- T1

Green Scace

• • •

-r -

-

Increase P811dna EBmlnala On GamDUS Parklna Pa11Mg Garaae

-

Parking & Transportation

-

I

I

I,

-

Secu rltv/Safetv

I I

,i

I I

I

I

- ..

• • • • • •

I

•

PEC Moton PEC Cum b .

Faculty/ Al umni Ad mis. Reg . Students Land lords Board SchBrd Brd Sup SchBrd Staff Assoc.

- - ·- ·-

• • • • • • •

I

l>arking & Tran soortation

Green Space Campus Identity Commun ity Connections Campus Gateways ISo ecialized Facilities

$.ec uiit'iLSatetv

48

Chamber of

(

Issue

I

Throughout the master planning process, several forums and meetings were held in an effort to ensure the involvement of key stakeholders.

Detailed notes were taken at each of these meetings, describing both definitive and intangible perspectives, thoughts, and feelings. Offering these meetings and charrettes created an opportunity to collect subjective and often times otherwise unobtainable information and input on important campus planning issues. Informal and open gatherings set the stage for the participants to feel comfortable in voicing their thoughts and perspectives on a variety of issues. Opinions and preferences were heard and taken into account, and are continually referenced throughout this document.

Town

Interest Gro u p Cou ncil Commerce Commun ity

I

ISSUE IDENTIFYING MATRIX

•

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences @

Group Inputs and Preferences

.... .. ....

----------------------------------Transportation and Parking Requirements and Preferences

REMOVING THE CARS FROM CAMPUS

ANTICIPATED PARKING SHORTFALL

During discussion forums with students, faculty, and staff, a large majority of participants expressed a strong desire to remove cars from the main ·campus in the future. Therefore, Longwood will move toward a car-free campus, with the exception of dedicated service and emergency vehicle corridors.

The anticipated parking shortfall will be approximate;ly 1 ,800 spaces (Table #20.2). This number includes the anticipate parking losses shown in Table #53.1.

-

- - - - - -

SERVICE CORRIDORS

Existing Parking Supply

2,252

Longwood operates nearly 40 golf carts that are used on the main campus for personnel and equipment transport, grounds maintenance, and facilities repair. Provision must be made for efficient routes for these vehicles so the requisite service can be provided without detracting from the pedestrian nature of the campus.

Projected Future Parki ng Losses

1 ,058

Projected enrollment and staffing numbers can be used to estimate future parking requirements, assuming that the current ratio of spaces per person remains unchanged. As of November 2007, there were 4,4 1 8 students on the main campus. This number is projected to grow to 6, 1 00 in the future. This constitutes a 38 percent increase, resulting in an increase in parking demand of 541 student spaces (at a constant ratio of 0.32 spaces per student), for a total of 1 ,9 6 1 student spaces. The number of faculty and staff personnel is expected to increase from 752 to 896 over the course of the planning period, resulting in an increase in parking space demand of 1 24 spaces if the current spaces per faculty/staff person ratio is maintained. Demand for other types of parking (visitor, handicapped, delivery, and state vehicles) is estimated to be an additional 35 spaces. Assuming no existing spaces are removed, the total additional parking demand would be 700 spaces (Table #20.1 ). On a typical day, not every student or faculty/staff person will be on campus; therefore, the expected increase due to population growth will be closer to 600 spaces. Applying a slightly reduced ration of 0.25 spaces per student could reduce the deficit to as low as 500.

7,21 6 35% Note: Students and Faculty/Staff parking ratios unchanged in the future

Total Future Parking Demand

2,952

Total Future Parking Shortfall Table # 20.2, Future Parking Shortfall

FUTURE PARKING DEMAND

5,355

----- 1 , 1 9

Projected Future Parking Supply

UNIVERSITY PARKING PREFERENCES Longwood will actively pursue efforts to provide off-campus parking in close proximity to the main campus. With the exception of Americans with Disability Act requirements, additional parking spaces will be placed off campus in the future.

700

Table # 20. 1 , Existing and Future Demographics Induced Parking Demand

49 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

�

ATHLETICS

Fulfillment of other Longwood preferences and objectives will result in the displacement of existing tennis courts in the northern and middle areas of campus. The university wishes to provide temporary replacement tennis courts and eventually construct 1 0- 1 2 permanent regulation courts elsewhere on the main campus.

A new natatorium building has been envisioned for the future campus, and possible sites will be considered. This facility is intended to meet Division I college athletic standards, while also supporting academic and recreational programs.

RECREATION The Health & Fitness Center, completed in 2007, has been enthusiastically received by students, faculty, staff, and the entire community. The space needs analysis predicts that this facility will accommodate Longwood's general indoor recreation needs for the foreseeable future. The completion of the Lancer Park Sports Complex in 2009 will fulfill most of the need for outdoor intramural sports space.

The athletic and recreation staffs and the general student population expressed the desire for an informal outdoor recreational space on the main campus. The First Avenue field currently serves this purpose, but is located several blocks from the main campus.

Students and faculty prefer a field on or directly adjacent to the main campus that could accommodate impromptu games and informal activities.

50

~

t_t

Willett Hall is the current campus basketball venue; however, this facility is dated and in need of renovation. W hile renovation of an existing facility is always an option, Longwood would prefer to establish a competitive facility for intercollegiate athletic events. A new facility would be appropriately sized based on a local and regional market study, and would seek to accommodate non-university events in cooperation with the town of Farmville and the surrounding community.

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

t

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences

® Athletic and Recreational Requirements and Preferences

Requirements for year 2020 60% of 5600 undergraduate students in university-controlled housing = 3360 2000 undergraduate students in on-campus housing 1360 undergraduate students in Real Estate Foundation apartmen ts -

- - -

-

-

-

-

I-

---

- -

Residence Hall

-- -

-

'

I

~

'

/ \' '

I ;~ ~ ' ' ' '

ARC Cox Cunninghams Curry Frazer French Stubbs South Ruffner Ta bb Wheeler On-Campus Total On-Campus Change Remaining On-Cam pus Total Year 2020 Requirement

-

-

- -- -

� -- ---

Fall 2008 Sta nda rd Occupancy 160 190 447 393 405 103 186 83 111 181 2259 -744 1515 2000

- -

- -

Cam pus Master Plan Guidance

-- - -

- - - -- -

- - - - --

Change

Replace with new Student Union

-447

Convert to IT building

-103

Convert to offices Convert to offices

-83 -111

Curry and Frazer high-rise residence halls are in the "fair" condition category. Discussions with various Longwood and community groups revealed conflicting opinions about these buildings. Some students and alumni expressed a strong sense of affiliation for the "community" aspect of these buildings, and believed that living there contributed positively to their college experience. Other members of the university and local community found the buildings to be unsightly and. out of scale to the rest of campus. The eventual decision to retain them for housing was based on the cost and lack of campus land on which to construct replacements.

-744

~ -1: , . ~

In fall 2008, nearly 80% of Longwood's undergraduate students lived in either the on-campus residence halls or off-campus university-managed apartments. The university's Student Affairs organization set the 2020 goal for student housing as 60% of undergraduate students residing in university-controlled housing, with 2000 in on-campus residence halls. The resulting future housing requirements for on- and off-campus housing are shown in Table #59.1. By 2020, 485 additional on-campus and 410 additional off-campus beds will be required.

--

Off-Ca -

-

-

Apartment Community

- --

Lancer Park

Longwood La ndi ngs Longwood Vil lage Apartment Total Year 2020 Req uirement

---

-

---

-

-

--

Fall 2008 Standard Occupancy

I

Anal -

--

-

--

-

--

-

�

- -

-

-

--

-

-

---

-

-

- - -- -

Many students, faculty, and alumni voiced a desire to renovate the Cunningham halls. These buildings were constructed in 1928, 1938, and 1958. All three have provided continuity and evoked a strong sense of nostalgia in the student body throughout the 20th century. However, the cost of retaining and renovating these buildings was judged to be excessive, and the choice was made to explore other uses for the site.

-

- -

-

260

408 282 950 1360 Table # 59.1

(8 Future Campus Requirements and Preferences

A complete inventory and evaluation of student housing facilities was conducted. Current and future preferences and guidelines were considered, and the 2007 campus Facilities Corn;lition Index Report was reviewed. The Facilities Condition Index Report listed all three of the Cunningham residence halls and French Hall in the "poor" category" in need of major maintenance and/or repair.

Future Student Housing Requirements ,,

~ 1 " t :__1 ~1 :....1:.__._t.__t~, ~~__.,_" · , ,_ , ,_

t

..

Housing Requirements

51 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

�

AREA

SPACE UTILIZATION

NEW (GSF)

EXISTING

.

(2009-

QUAD I UNIT C

DORMITORY

70,400

-

2012)

STUDENT UNION BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

1 20,000

--

MAIN CUNNINGHAM

DORMITORY

(29,827)

70,400

NORTH CUNNINGHAM

DORMITORY

(42,975)

SOUTH CUNNINGHAM

DORMITORY

(47,081)

PARKING

-

PLANT

PHYSICAL PLANT BUILDING

100,000

66,330

34,000

34,000

--

35

2,460

1,260

--

35

2,460

1,260

50

6,000

3,080

-

-

35

(1,040)

(530)

--

35

(1,500)

(770)

---

35

(1 ,650)

(850)

185,000

--

--

--

--

---

68,000

-----

350,000

---

36,000

-

-

--

FIELD

CONVOCATION CENTER

ASSEMBLY

170,000

--

--

50

8,500

4,360

--

410,917

-

639,000

---

1 5,230

7,810

ASSEMBLY

30,000

-

--

50

1,500

770

LANDSCAPE

ADMISSIONS/ VISITORS CENTER

---

(2012-

LIBRARY EXPANSION & BRIDGE

ASSEMBLY

3,600

30,000

-

50

180

90

2016)

LANKFORD RENOVATION/ADDITION

ASSEMBLY

40,000

40,000

--

50

2,000

1 ,030

--

--

DORRILL CANOPY

CANOPY

N/A

-

--

-----

---

---

RECREATION FIELD

FIELD

--

--

33,500

--

--

--

TENNIS COURTS PHASE 11

FIELD

--

--

51 ,000

--

--

--

--

50

2,750

1,410

1 74,500

--

6,430

3,300

PERFORMING ARTS THEATER SUBTOTAL

FIELD

--

ASSEMBLY

55,000

-

--

128,600

70,000

90,000

30,000

-

50

1 ,500

770

---

-

LANDSCAPE

--

30,000

--

-

--

2020)

SUBTOTAL

---

30,000

-

30,000

--

1 ,500

770

-

-

COMMUNITY OUTREACH BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

30,000

(2020+)

NORTH EAST ACADEMIC BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

30,000

NATATORIUM

GYMNASIUM

24,700

-

CURRY FRAZER REPLACEMENT

DORMITORY

145,000

--

CURRY RESIDENCE HALL

DORMITORY

(1 07,424)

--

FRAZER

DORMITORY

(1 03,990)

-

-

---

1 8,286

#REF!

-

2,100,000

#REF!

-

SUBTOTAL

TOTAL

NOTES:

--

45,000

46,000

I

50

1 ,500

770

50

1 ,500

770

30

740

380

35

5,080

2,600

35

(3,760)

(1 ,930)

35

(3,640)

(1 ,870)

--

1 ,420

730

--

90,900

46,600

47,000

I

-

4

42,000

I

ASSEMBLY

BROCK COMMONS EXT.

'I

HULL BUILDING ANNEX

I

3 (2016-

Table # 26. 1

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

-

TENNIS COURTS PHASE I

LANDSCAPE

ILER FIELD IMPROVEMENTS

Notes: 1 . Peak steam load based upon 2004 boiler logs.

2. Peak heating load calculations based on a 0.5 1 diversity factor.

CUMULATIVE HEATING LOAD (PPH)

-

SPRUCE STREET GREENWAY & LOOP NORTHEAST GREENWAY & PLAZA

SUBTOTAL 2

PEAK HEATING LOAD (PPH)

1 ,515,280

DORMITORY

LANCER PARK PARKING

CONNECTED HEATING LOAD (PPH)

I

Finally, the peak heating load was added to the cumulative heating demand in order to approximate the total cumulative heating load at the end of each phase, hence aiding in the projection of the future boiler capacity requirements.

QUAD I UNIT B

UNITARY HEATING LOAD (BTU/GSF)

PARKING/ FIELD (GSF)

'I

The current space utilization of existing buildings was used to estimate the unitary heating loads in Btu/Gsf The unitary heating loads were then applied to the future buildings in order to estimate the building connected (design) load in pounds per hour (pph).

A unidess diversity factor, calculated based upon the ratio of the existing peak heating demand and total building area, was applied to the building connected load to estimate the future peak demand on the central steam plant.

1

--

I

2020+

RENOV. (GSF)

1. PEAK STEAM LOAD BASED UPON 2004 BOILER LOGS. 2. PEAK HEATING LOAD CALCULATIONS BASED ON A 0.51 DIVERSITY FACTOR. 3. FUTURE BUILDING LIST PROVIDED BY MOSELEY ARCHITECTS 7/24/2008.

843,500

--

, ... , ..... ,

I

20 1 6-2020

BUILDING NAME

I

PHASE NO.

I

20 1 2-20 1 6

-

- Phase IV

2009-20 1 2

I

· Phase III

LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY

I

• Phase II

FUTURE BUI LDING STEAM SUMMARY

'I

• Phase I

I

Future buildings were listed based upon the Longwood University Comprehensive Master Plan and separated into four phases:

I

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences @

e

52

Infrastructure Requirements, Steam

• •

--

Infrastructure Requirements, Electric LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY AREA

PHASE NO.

BUILDING NAME

SPACE UTILIZATIDN

NEW (GSF)

--

EXISTING QUAD I UNIT B

DORMITORY

70,400

(2009-

QUAD I UNIT C

DORMITORY

70,400

STUDENT UNION BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

1 20,000

MAIN CUNNINGHAM

DORMITORY

(29,827)

NORTH CUNNINGHAM

DORMITORY

(42,975)

SOUTH CUNNINGHAM

DORMITORY

(47,081)

LANCER PARK PARKING

PARKING

-

PHYSICAL PLANT BUILDING

PLANT

100,000

SPRUCE STREET GREENWAY & LOOP

LANDSCAPE

NORTHEAST GREENWAY & PLAZA

LANDSCAPE

CONNECTED ELECTRIC LOAD (KW)

PEAK ELECTRIC LOAD (KW)

3

4,550

3,500

·-

4

280

220

-

-

4

280

220

4

480

370

--

-

4

(120)

(90)

4

(170)

(130)

4

(190)

(150)

---

--

---

...

-

-

...

--

-

---

---

4

680

520

---

1 , 240

950

4

120

90

4

10

10

4

160

120

---

--

---

410,917

---

-

ADMISSIONS / VISITORS CENTER

ASSEMBLY

30,000

(2012-

LIBRARY EXPANSION & BRIDGE

ASSEMBLY

3,600

30,000

2016)

LANKFORD RENOVATION/ADDITION

ASSEMBLY

40,000

FIELD

-

40,000

DORRILL CANOPY

CANOPY

NIA

-----

RECREATION FIELD

FIELD

TENNIS COURTS PHASE II

FIELD

-

90,000

33,500

-

1 28,600

70,000

1 74,500

30,000

-

--

---

4

220

170

--

510

390

120

90

---

1 20

90

4

1 20

90

4

120

90

4

100

80

4

580

450

4

(430)

(330)

4

(420)

(320)

70

50

6,500

5,000

---

51,000

---

---

---

-

4

30,000

...

30,000

-

ASSEMBLY

30,000

---

NORTH EAST ACADEMIC BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

30,000

--

NATATORIUM

GYMNASIUM

24,700

---

CURRY FRAZER REPLACEMENT

DORMITORY

145,000

CURRY RESIDENCE HALL

DORMITORY

(107,424)

FRAZER

DORMITORY

(103,990)

--

--

1 8,286

#REF!

-

---

2,100,000

#REF!

843,500

-

4

COMMUNITY OUTREACH BUILDING

(202o+)

SUBTOTAL

--

---

I

SUBTOTAL

2020)

ASSEMBLY

-

-··

4,500

20 1 2-20 1 6

20 1 6-2020 2020+

The existing and future unitary loads were estimated to be 3 W / Gsf and 4 W /Gsf, respectively. Analogously to the steam demand summary, unitary electric loads were used to calculate the building connected (design) load in kilowatts (KW ) _ The ratio of the existing peak electric demand and total building area was ·used to calculate a diversity factor which was later applied to the building connected load to estimate the future peak electric demand. Unlike the central steam plant owned by the university, electricity is purchased through Dominion Virginia Power Company. Dominion Power was then presented with the potential future demand at the end of Phase N and confirmed the ability to support any future Longwood University demand.

-----

-

-

4,900

5,000

� (t) (t)

� (t) �

0

(t)

5,100

rJl

--

I

I

I NOTES:

i,,,,- .

(t)

I

TOTAL

(t)

rJl

I

HULL BUILDING ANNEX

639,000

55,000

I

3

--

---

-

- Phase III - Phase IV

--

---

- Phase II

2009-201 2

and Ir fe

2

---

68,000

3,500

• Phase I

Ill nt

--

--

SUBTOTAL

--

CUMULATIVE ELECTRIC LOAD (KW)

--

--

36,000

170,000

ASSEMBLY

-

--

FIELD

PERFORMING ARTS THEATER

185,000

---

ASSEMBLY

-

-

350,000

CONVOCATION CENTER

ILEA FIELD IMPROVEMENTS

-

---

TENNIS COURTS PHASE I

SUBTOTAL

PARKING/ FIELD (GSF)

1,515,280

1

2012)

UNITARY ELECTRIC LOAD (W/GSF)

RENOV. (GSF)

Future Catnpus R qu

Similarly to the future steam summary, buildings were grouped based upon the Longwood University Comprehensive Master Plan into four phases:

FUTURE BUILDING ELECTRIC SUMMARY

Cy)

1. PEAK ELECTRIC LOADS CALCULATIONS BASED ON A 0.76 DIVERSITY FACTOR. 2. FUTURE BUILDING LIST PROVIDED BY MOSELEY ARCHITECTS 7/24/2008.

3. LIGHTING FOR SURFACE PARKING AND FIELDS NOT INCLUDED IN THE (DAYTIME) PEAK LOAD CALCULATIONS. 4. PEAK ELECTRIC LOAD BASED UPON 2003 TENG REPORT. AMF 7 MAY 2009

Table # 26.2

@

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

53

- Phase N

SPACE BUILDING NAME

IMPERVIOUS AREA

UTILIZATION

(SQ.FT)

201 2-20 1 6

201 6-2020

-

EXISTING

The amount of existing impervious area was determined from university data to be approximately 700,000 square feet. The amount of future impervious area was calculated from the Campus Master Plan project list, which delineates new buildings and changes to campus hardscapes. The future impervious area will increase to approximately 1 ,000,000 square feet.

700,000

QUAD I UNIT B

DORMITORY

20,000

(2009-

QUAD I UNIT C

DORMITORY

20,000

2012)

STUDENT UNION BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

50,000

CUNNINGHAM (DEMO)

DORMITORY

(30,000)

LANCER PARK PARKING

PARKING

-

PHYSICAL PLANT BUILDING

PLANT

100,000

SPRUCE STREET GREENWAY & LOOP

LANDSCAPE

(70,000)

NORTHEAST GREENWAY & PLAZA

LANDSCAPE

-

TENNIS COURTS PHASE I

FIELD

40,000

CONVOCATION CENTER

ASSEMBLY

90,000

-

220,000

1

2020+

2

ADMISSIONS/ VISITORS CENTER

I

I

SUBTOTAL

ASSEMBLY

--

(2012-

LIBRARY EXPANSION & BRIDGE

ASSEMBLY

5,000

2016)

LANKFORD RENOVATION/ADDITION

ASSEMBLY

20,000

ILER FIELD IMPROVEMENTS DORRILL CANOPY RECREATION FIELD

FIELD

PERFORMING ARTS THEATER SUBTOTAL

-

FIELD CANOPY

TENNIS COURTS PHASE II

-

FIELD ASSEMBLY

-

-

25,000

3

HULL BUILDING ANNEX

ASSEMBLY

-

(2016-

BROCK COMMONS EXT.

LANDSCAPE

(20,000)

I

2020)

SUBTOTAL

I

-

(20,000)

4

COMMUNITY OUTREACH BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

-

(2020+)

NORTH EAST ACADEMIC BUILDING

ASSEMBLY

1 0,000

NATATORIUM

GYMNASIUM

25,000

CURRY FRAZER REPLACEMENT

DORMITORY

40,000

CURRY RESIDENCE HALL (DEMO) FRAZER (DEMO) SUBTOTAL

DORMITORY

(15,000)

DORMITORY

(1 5,000)

-

45,000

970,000

l

TOTAL

Table # 25. 1

@

54 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

NOTES:

1. SURFACE AREAS BASED ON THE 2008 MASTER PLAN

11111 1~ ! .! !

NO.

RMF 7 MAY 2009

-

• Phase III

PHASE

2009-20 1 2

I

• Phase II

LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY

II

• Phase I

FUTU RE BUILDING STORM SEWER SUM MARY

"',,'

Analogously to the future steam summary, buildings were grouped based upon the Longwood University Comprehensive Master Plan into four phases:

I

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences @

Infrastructure Requirements, Storm Sewer

• Sustainability

A six-step process was followed by the planning team to incorporate sustainability in the master planning effort:

• Develop a u n iversity water ma nagement pol icy • Red uce stormwater ru noff • Red uce stormwater conta m i nates leavi ng the site

• Reduce the amount of non -food waste

• Reduce g reenhouse gas e m 1 ss1ons

• Red uce the a m o u nt of food waste

• Red uce the a n n u a l cost of non - renewa ble energy p u rchases

• Reduce the amount of n utrients p u rchased for la ndsca ping

• I m p rove the fuel effi ­ ciency a n d red uce the carbon em issions from fleet veh icles

1. Define data collection areas, boundaries, and standards

• Reduce the n u m bers of cars brought by com muter students, facu lty, a n d staff

2. Define Longwood-specific- data to be collected 3. Collect the required data 4. Use the collected data to set goals 5. Define strategies and pathways to meet the goals

e I ncrease bicycle a nd pedestria n tri ps • Red uce ca rbon em issions related to veh icle tri ps to/from Longwood

6. Incorporate the strategies and pathways in the campus master plan An overview of the resultant goals is shown in Figure #29.

Figure # 29

Future Catnpus Requiretnents and Preferences

The 1987 United Nations publication Our Common Future - The World Commission on Environment and Development established the first clear definition of the term "sustainability" - "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." The leadership of Longwood University realizes and acknowledges the need to include sustainability in all aspects of university life and operations. Therefore, sustainability was included in the master planning effort to ensure that Longwood proceeds in a sustainable direction in the future, and to devise suitable short-, mid-, and long-term implementation goals and strategies.

®

55 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

@

,• •---------------------------------

Development of the Plan

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

VI

57

Areas of Opportunity Initial areas of opportunity were identified through several avenues. The reports, analysis, meetings, and university preferences identified numerous creative approaches for consideration within the following focus areas: Improved Site and Building Use or Reallocation - These areas were evaluated as to whether they met their best use, with particular emphasis on function and adjacency.

- Improved Entrances and Gateways - These areas were proposed to help establish and improve function, image, and over aesthetics of the campus.

Improved Circulation and Green Space - Careful consideration was taken to afford the most cohesive collegiate environment for the entire campus.

: tl/f

c-

,

O

.

CJ�

00--~

:~-~~\ p3f ~\Ir .

J~

lI

~ CJ u. ~~ 'n ~c:;.

-

Ol,19£

i:.:::_)

I

-

CJD

o

;j

D..

D

0.:

a,9_t

_C; -

Figure # 30 Areas of Opportunity

58 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

a

I{ 0 1E P , I _, r

'

I i c:,Or�i_ . ' '

0

o. c

:cs•• 0

•._,,' •• •• •• ,, •• ••

Concepts and Alternatives - Landscaping, Entrances, Gateways, and Boundaries LANDSCAPING

ENT RANCES, GAT EWAYS, AND BOUNDARIES

The development of Brock Commons established the nexus for the rejuvenation of the Longwood campus. Brock Commons established an impressive pedestrian corridor that provides a pleasant pathway along the north-south axis of the campus p romoting easy access to buildings located both east and west of Brock Commons.

Longwood University is an integral part of the larger community and serves as an important place within the community for employment, services, entertainment, cultural events, and athletics. Longwood is truly one of the supporting pillars of the community.

During the planning process many individuals from the campus community indicated a desire to enhance the green spaces of the campus to continue the positive impact of Brock Commons. The land use analysis of the campus indicates that 42% of the existing campus is un-programmed open space (Figure #10), implying that the quality of the open space, not the amount of open space maybe the issue.

Considering the importance of the institution to the community, lt 1s imperative that the campus have a distinctive identity and that entry points into the campus promote easy access. During the planning process considerable attention and debate surrounded the issue of identifying the front door to the campus. Traditionally, the historic part of the campus facing High Street has served as the visual identity for the institution. This part of the campus however, is not easily accessible from the major vehicular path that is used by visitors.

To address the desire to enhance the green space of the campus, several strategies were developed, illustrated in green (future on right) .

- Abandon, where possible, internal streets and convert these areas to green space.

Currently the default "main" entrance for the campus is located �t the intersection of Main Street and Redford Street. This entrance does provide adequate access to the underground parking facility but does not promote the openness and ease of access to the campus that is needed.

• Extend Wheeler Mall to include the area south of Ruffner and French Halls thereby creating a continuous east-west green space on the northern part of campus.

• Convert the area immediately west of Curry and Frazer residence halls (Spruce Street) to a pedestrian mall.

• Create a campus quad through the development of additional residence halls west of the library.

After careful consideration, the decision was made to abandon the pursuit of a single "main" entrance, and establish three levels of portals that afford access directly to various sections of campus. The three levels are vehicular and pedestrian, pedestrian only, and service vehicles (Figure #31) . Proposed vehicular/pedestrian portals are depicted in dark blue, pedestrian-only portals in purple, and service portals in light blue. The success of all these portals will depend on not only functional design, but also on visual aspects such as edge definition, landscape, hardscape, signage, and signals.

• Extend Brock Commons south to the site for the new convocation center and enhance the green space around the new convocation center and the new admissions office - visitor information center. : Re-program the open space east of the dining hall by changing us use from an active outdoor space to an outdoor seating and contemplative area with arboretum-style landscaping.

The nature and design of the campus green space should reflect the institution's sustainability initiatives.

Specifically, low-water-use landscaping and high-efficiency irrigation systems should be utilized.

tj

<(D (D

,-.......

0

a

�

(D

~

0

�

�

(D

�

,-.......

§

Q O

D

Q

cj a

•

3 1, Development, ces, Gateways, and nes 11

I

Pedestrian Gateway Service Entrance --• Campus Boundary Vehicular and Pedestrian Entrance Enhanced Green Space

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

59

@ Concepts and Alternatives Land and Building Uses ,¼ ..J

LI RARY

l'RELl�11.\ARY STL'DY 30,000 ASF. OR 45.000 G F.

(:j

I

I

0

... '

.. l J.

('~

(/

~

0

r1

~

D

I

~

01

OPTIO:-S A • TERMINATE RACE STREET

-

• 2 LEVELS 15.000 GSF ADDITIO'-1

- lr~

.1

OPTIO'-1 13 • Pl!ESERVE RACE STREET

ti

• 2 LEVELS 11 .000 GSF ADDITIO'-1

O '

OPTION C • REKOVATION AND REASSIG NMENT OF

LANKFORD • STUDENT U N I O N

20,000 GSF ADDITION T O LANKFORD • PEDESTRIAN BRIDCiE CONSTRUCTED TO CO�NECT TIIE EXISTING LIBRARY TO

Figure # 32 d, and Buildings, Library

Q

THE Aoo1110N.

l]

• ;�/,

t

F

-� �

.�

�

'.I]

l'l!ELIMl'-IAHY STUDY I 5.400 ASF. OR 2';,600 GSF.

J

�tJI�

Ol'TIOJ\ A

r

0

.. a71 u;7...-·��J

ONE-STOP SERVICES BUILDING

I

J r..

RECOMMENDATION - GREENWOOD LIBRARY AND LANKFORD BUILDING EXPANSION / A large addition to the western side of the building poses a RENOVATION problem. The size necessary to provide the required area would Ultimately, an interesting combined solution for both eliminate or at least severely interfere with the proposed western requirements emerged - a joint Greenwood Library pedestrian spine along Race Street . and Lankford building expansion and renovation.

Option B Option A

p; 11 ,l "'':P.

I

raising the concern that these prime locations would not be effectively utilized. Option C, the Lankford building, The space need analysis revealed a deficiency of approximately is at the center of campus. However, as with the other 42,000 gross square feet, comprised mostly of student lounge two sites, Lankford contains more area (35,500 gross and reader station space. The initial approach was to simply square feet) than required for this function. renovate the existing structure and add to either the west and/ or south facades.

GREENWOOD LIBRARY Issue

• NEW CONSTRCCTION 2 LE\'EL� 51 .000 G,F

I

, ,; �

:\::::1J-

• RENOVATION AND RF.ASSIG'\/MENT OF BRISTOW HALL

This option, wrapping an addition around both the western and southern sides of the building, would provide the required area and preserve the pedestrian route, but would be expensive and inefficient to construct.

This option would renovate and reassign space in the Lankford building to the library after the student union functions move to a new building. A 20,000 GSF addition to Lankford would be required, along with a pedestrian bridge between the two buildings.

Option C

ONE STOP STUDENT SERVICES I STUDENT SUCCESS CENTER Issue

The choice was made to consolidate a variety of student support and business services in a single central location. The following organizations will be included in this concept: Student Accounts, Parking, Registration, Financial Aid, Housing, Telecommunications, IT Help Desk, Academic and Career Advising Center, Learning Center, Student Athletic Support Services, Disability Services, First Year Experience, and Longwood Seminar.

The space needs analysis estimated that approximately 26,000 gross square feet would be required for this facility. All three site options are centrally located and can accommodate a building of the required size . Options A and B might create pedestrian/ Figure # 33 vehicle conflicts since both are near main vehicle entrances.

L.w.d. and Buildings, One-Stop Furthermore, these sites can accommodate larger buildings, thus

Since the Lankford building contains more space than required for a Student Support Center, the excess space could be utilized for library expansion. The adjacency of Lankford and the Greenwood Library makes connecting the two buildings straightforward.

••

The location of Greenwood and Lankford is • unsurpassed for both functions - library and student • support. Incorporating both functions into one central campus location would maximize the value of • the space in the existing two buildings, and would provide a convenient and efficient support and • learning environment for students. The addition • of twin wings on the western side of Lankford will • provide ample space while still maintaining the integrity of the outdoor courtyard and Lankford Mall.

Finally, the Race Street pedestrian corridor would remain unimpeded. This solution is pragmatic and cost effective, while adding excitement and interest to the campus environment.

Options

OPTION C

• RENOVATION AND REA S S I G N M E N T O F L ANKF O R D

E).1S'flNG COJ\1)ITION

60 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•• •

Concepts and Alternatives - Land and Building Uses

STUDENT UNION Issue Space needs analysis reveled a deficit of nearly 65 ,000 gross square feet of student union space at target enrollment.

Option A Two options were evaluated for the much needed Student Union space. The first option called for the renovation and expansion of the existing Student Union building.

A 65,000 square foot addition to Lankford would eliminate the highly-used courtyard on the west side of the building, intrude into Lankford Mall, and impede the north-south pedestrian flow on the west side of campus. Since the goals of the master . plan process include improving pedestrian circulation and maintaining the historic residential character of the campus, this option was not optimal.

Option B The second option required the demolition of the beloved Cunninghams. This site would afford the campus an opportuni ty to have a state of the art centralized student union that could potentially bridge the gap between the 1 9th and 2 1 st centuries, in terms of both architectural expression and the Universi ty experience. The Cunningham buildings strike an emotional chord with many of the students, facul ty, staff and alumni as they have played an important part in their experience at Lon�'lood.

?{ti~.V

~

.

,

a

~ ,~ ~

01!§¼

PRELIMINARY STUDY

<-

,()_

~~~~

Q?O

'"k

i~

~ = rJ ~tJf[y~~-14.

LANKFORD STUDENT UNION

q

~

OPTION A • RENOVATIO

'ilJC

• 2 LEVELS 65,000 GSF. ADDITION ( 40,000 ASF).

~[/l e

•

- -----=--~,~~~

~;l . if-: !~l~ ~ ·4~d t f

0

,oU

1

~ -

\!IP.· ·

~~

D ::,:J g.. ~ Q

o

o~'?-';

~

T

iffel . c,n.11:•~--~

,~~'}"".

I; ~

~

~ • / / / ""\•~

..,,_,.,J,1-,a:-,·~-~'-",.:,=_,...,

,,.ie t) l,t-'

I

□ 1 0..

D

"if

D

\ O.

~

•

OF EXIST! G BUILDING

6 ,~0

~

I~

/· g•• O

___ r;:-

i~fJ

',U,

/J

OPTION B

1

• DEMOLITION OF CU NINGHAMS • CONSTRUCTIO OF A NEW STUDENT UNION (APPROXIMATELY 1 20,000 GSF) ON CUN INGHAM SITE

- � - �ti - =1=I

[

EXJSTIN G C..:ON lJfflO S

f-

l�

,LA

d}r;

= __LiL ICS

• RE OVATION AND RE-ASSIGNMENT OF LANKFORD

Figure # 3 5

I Development, Land, and Buildings, Lankford

RECOMMENDATION The decision to choose option B was based on two factors the exorbitant cost of renovating the Cunninghams and the advantages of locating a new Student Union on an optimal site. This site offers the key advantage of facing three of the most significant outdoor campus areas - Brock Commons, Beale Plaza, and Wheeler Mall. The site is also at the center of all the campus precincts and is at the crossroads of student activity and movement throughout the day. Finally, there is sufficient land area on which to construct this significant campus structure.

Fi

re # 36 Prelimina

Sketch, Lankford

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

61

fl fl fl

Concepts and Alternatives - Land and Building Uses V

1 o·' ,J/J,

t

�

(l.) �

0

(l.)

E:

D O D~~

q_~ .

- ~"{\t"'

0

(l.)

•

>(l.)

~~~ .

~~

• RENOVATIO AND REASSIGNMENT OF ILER 1 2,000 ASF OR 19,000 GSF

·. �

tr~ ~' 0

-~~

f

0 '

~~

• D lSTRIBUTlON OF FOOD SERVICES

225,000 ASF OR 40,000 GSF

• RENOVATION AND REASSIGNMENT OF ILER 12,000 ASF OR 19,000 GSF.

OPTION C

• 6,400 GSF ASSIGNED AT FRAZER CURRY ADDITION

•RENOVATION AND REASSIG MENT OF ILER 12,000 ASF OR ]9.000 GSF

•DISTIUBUTION OF FOOD SERVICES

•ADDITJON TO ILER 8,000 GSF •CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OUTDOOR FLEXIBLE EATERY AT LANKFORD 1,300 GSF

I

i� \, l\

I

,I

~

s

•ENHANCED FOOD SERVICES IN STUDENT UNION

�

~=~ �

•3,000 GSF ASSIGNED AT FRAZER CURRY ADDJTlON

,LJ M ~

~

1-

�rLi

---;:

FOOD SERVICE

PRELIMJNARY STUDY

C\ �

=~1, EXISTING CONDITIO

DORRILL DINING HALL

ff U ] � d 0

'

--.

t

OPTION B

G

I

~-

'

• CONTINUATION OF CENTRALIZED FOOD SERVICES

.~

,. . . . _~'-"-Y3!~~~

'~Cl,

�

Sia

~~V~l~

A

OPTION A

o

l

----<""

.__,._,.

Issue Longwood currently provides nearly all food service at the Dorrill Dining Hall. An additional small amount is available at the Lankford Student Union, leaving the campus with an overall deficit of nearly 6,000 ASF for the current enrollment. By the year 2020, the deficit will exceed 25,000 ASF for the target enrollment - a large amount of space considering the size of the current facilities.

Options The Iler building that adjoins Dorrill was considered in all three options.

Iler was constructed as Longwood's gymnasium, and currently serves as teaching and recreational space. Considering its size and location next to the Dorrill Dining Hall, the renovation and conversion of Iler to food service use would be the most effective and efficient use of space.

•..

....

..•

•• •• •• •

However, the overwhelming desire expressed by all campus groups was to distribute future food service throughout the campus. The groups also expressed an interest in an outdoor or seasonal venue.

J

'

a � D

� .P

Figure # 37 Development, Land,, and Buildings, Dorrill

RECOMMENDATION Ultimately, an abbreviated version of the distributed food service concept was chosen. Iler Hall will retain its current configuration and function. Substantial space will be designated in the new Student Union building for food service. Dorrill Dining Hall will receive an exterior canopy and seating stairs on its eastern fafade, and a new outdoor service capability. A new pavilion will be constructed directly across Iler Field to offer another outdoor/ seasonal food service venue. Finally, an expanded coffee shop venue is envisioned for the renovated and expanded Library/Lankford complex.

•

62 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•• •• •

.,Vf?l} �(::,

•o�

{}

()

(]

0.

Concepts and Alternatives - Land and Building Uses

'-.J>,J

'9,;,§ @ . ·'

CJ <: 0

PUBLIC SAFTEY & UNIVERSITY SERVICES BUILDING

'

ADMISSIONS OFFICE & VISITOR INFORMATION CENTER

�

fJ

(__ (

PRELIMINARY SITE ST DY 1 2,000 ASF. OR 30,000 GSF.

rf

Oqj'

.&,

:~ !

• OPTION A Y

PROXIMIT TO THE PRIMARY VEHICULAR

ENTRA CE

Ci,1!!:,

C

,;.

-

0 0

0

o.go

•

C

aoOo

o

0

9l _

"'"'~a. 1P D G

!3

�JI

.. al =i�

• OPTIO

•&

a-

B

VlSUAL PROMINENCE FROM THE PRIMARY VEHJCULAR APPROACH

_ �j

r� � �

·,-\

.

�

·g

I �1 � 0{ ( 6 IJ

�

Figure # 39 Development, Land and Buildings, Public Safety and University Services

EXISTING CONDITrONS

PUBLIC SAFETY/UNIVERSITY SERVICES AND ADMISSIONS OFFICE BUILDINGS Issue Choosing sites for buildings housing two major university organizations that require extensive contact with members of the public as well as the campus community. The Admissions Office plays a significant and highly visible role in Longwood's operation and future. It is often visitors' and prospective students' first encounter with the university, and provides their initial and lasting impression. The Public Safety Department would also benefit from a convenient location that is equally accessible from campus and the surrounding area.

Several other functions and organizations were identified as requiring convenient access by both the public and campus personnel visitor information center, employment office, procurement office, safety office, and community outreach organizations s·uch as the Longwood Center for Communications, Literacy, and Learning (LCCLL) .

Options Two sites were identified for buildings housing these functions.

Each site is in a highly visible position on the periphery of campus, and can accommodate a 30,000 GSF building and ample visitor parking.

RECOMMENDATION Site A was selected for a building housing the Public Safety, Environmental Health and Safety, and Human Resources organizations. This site is close to the populous areas of campus, and offers convenient access to both university personnel and members of the public. This building will be sized to accommodate some of Longwood's community outreach programs, such as clinics.

igure # 40 Preliminary Sketc ,

Site B was selected for the Admissions Office and a small visitor information center. This site is located on the main approach route to campus used by prospective students and visitors. This site will offer instant recognition and immediate access to the Admissions Office, and subsequently to Brock Commons and the campus core.

63 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Concepts and Alternatives - Vehicular Circulation and Parking VEHICULAR CIRCUIATION This section identifies issues and presents alternatives and recommendations about traffic circulation and parking. The recommendations also include improvements to associated pedestrian facilities at each location.

Bike / Pedestrian bridge from Lancer Park to Grove Street

Vehicular bridge from Lancer Park to Third Street

�

----..::: �'y G ,.;:,�t;;

IANCER PARK Issue

Option B

• Access to Lancer Park is difficult • Planned student recreation facilities at Lancer Park will increase the need for safe and convenient pedestrian connections to campus.

• Construct a vehicular bridge from Lancer Park to Third Street, with striped bicycle lanes and sidewalks.

Option A

• Construct two separate bridges connecting Lancer Park with the surrounding area. The first would be vehicular and connect to Third Street, while the other would be a bicycle/ pedestrian bridge connecting Lancer Park to Grove Street.

Advantages

Provides a convenient and safe pedestrian connection between campus and Lancer Park by the shortest and most direct route.

Provides quicker shuttle bus connectivity between campus and Lancer Park.

Supports the concept of a park-and-ride lot at Lancer Park.

Separates pedestrians and bicyclists from vehicles, thus providing optimal traffic safety.

Disadvantages •

More costly and complex that Option B. Requires that pedestrian and bicycle routes be improved along a continuous route from the bridges to campus. Bicycle route signage should be installed along Grove, Buffalo, Oak, and Appomattox streets; pedestrian crossings should be clearly marked at intersections; and sidewalks and lighting should be improved as necessary.

64 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

�

c;, l� (j

Advantages •

Less costly than Option A.

Disadvantages

• Despite being less expensive than Option A, this is still a costly, long-term solution.

• Has no separate pedestrian and bicycle route across West Third Street, thus offering no significant safety improvement.

• Would not significantly shorten the pedestrian and bicycle distances between Lancer Park and campus.

• Most of the same pedestrian and bicycle route improvements called for in Option A would still be required.

Freshman exception parking to be replaced with intramural fields

RECOMMENDATION Option A: Construct two separate bridges. While more costly, this option will provide optimal separation between vehicle and pedestrian/bicycle traffic, and will decrease the total travel distance and time between Lancer Park and cam­ pus.

Legend Exis til'I g veh i cu lar con n e c ti m --- •

Pr oposed ve h i cu lar a ccess

----

Proposed pede stria /bicy cle access

Figure # 41 Lancer Park Proposed Access

.... .. .... ..

Concepts and Alternatives - Vehicular Circulation and Parking HIGH STREET

REDFORD/RACE STREETS T-JUNCTION

Issue

Issue

• High Street is used by buses as a passenger drop-off point, creating back-ups and compromising pedestrian safety.

Option A •

Create a bus drop-off pull-in area in front of Jarman Hall.

Advantages

• Buses would no longer stop and wait on High Street - traffic flow is uninterrupted resulting in increased traffic safety.

Creates a short-term drop-off and loading zone.

Increases safety for pedestrians crossing High Street.

Disadvantages

• Adds concrete to the main campus area

RECOMMENDATION Construct the drop-off area in front of Jarman Hall.

Figure # 42 Option A, Legend Hi h Street _ - Proposed Bus / Vehicular Access .,._ _______ Pedestrian Access ■ ■■■■ ■

• The Stop sign located at the T-junction of Redford and Pine streets is not visible to vehicles approachin g the intersection northbound on Race Street. The sign's visibili ty is impaired by vehicles parked on the eastern side of Race Street.

Option A

• The stop sign in question would be removed due to closure of Race Street from Vine to Redford streets. Parking along Race Street within the affected area would be removed as well.

Advantages

• Elimination of the issue, and improved pedestrian flow and safety.

Dis advantages •

Loss of parking along Race Street.

Legend ■ ■ ■ ■ Proposed Roadway Abandonment Stop Sign Removed X

Figure # 43 Option A, Race Street

• The stop sign in question would remain, but its height would be adjusted to comply with the MUTCD regulations (www.mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2003r 1 /pdf­ index.htm) : Chapter 2A. Section 2A. 1 8 : "Where arking or pedestrian movements f occur, the clearance to the bottom of the sign shal be at least 2. 1 m (7 ft) ."

• In addition, the three parking spaces in the closest proximi ty to the stop sign would be removed in order to improve its visibility. These could be replaced with bicycle parking.

• Raised crosswalk would be added across Radford Street.

Option B

Advantages: •

Parking along Race Street remains largely as is.

•

Vehicular traffic on Race Street remains as is.

Disadvantages:

Legend

Removed Parking Stop sign remains, height adjusted to 7 feet minimum

RECOMMENDATION • Option A, Close Race Street Figure # 44 Option to vehicle traffic between West Redford and Vine streets as B, Race Street soon as possible.

D

Raised cross.valk

Redfor d

Li bra ry

--

L

Libra ry Extension

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

65

Concepts and Alternatives - Vehicular Circulation and Parking MADISON STREET TRUCK TRAFFIC

MADISON STREET AND SOUTH MAIN STREET INTERSECTION Excessive traffic congestion is experienced by motorists traveling eastbound on Madison Street and attempting to turn -left onto South Main Street. The back-ups will worsen as traffic levels increase in the future.

Issue

• The amount of truck traffic on Madison Street results in conflicts with pedestrians and other vehicles in the area. Up to four sawdust delivery trucks travel to and from the Heating Plant daily. Many delivery trucks service the Dining Hall at the western end of the street throughout the day. The trucks must turn around at the end of Madison Street, which is difficult due to the restricted space.

Issue

Figure # 45 Option A, Madison Street Congestion

Construct a new traffic circle at the western end of Madison Street to retain access to the Dining Hall while providing sufficient space for trucks to easily turn around. Construct a roadway around the New Heating Plant to allow the sawdust delivery trucks to reach the New Heating Plant without blocking traffic on Madison Street.

Option A

Signalize the Madison Street/South Main Street intersection. A dedicated left turn lane would be an option, but a dedicated left turn signal would not be necessary.

Option A

Advantages: Eases traffic congestion by providing some additional capacity on Madison Street due to the signalization.

Disadvantages: Adds another (third) traffic signal on South Main Street in the two-block area.

Three-way stop signs placed at South Main Street southbound and northbound and at Madison Street.

::

-

Option B

Advantages: Neither the traffic signal nor dedicated left turn lane would be required.

Disadvantages: This option would potentially result in slower traffic flow on South Main Street - vehicles would be required to stop at Madison Street even though traffic congestion is only an issue at certain times of the day.

RECOMMENDATION . Request that the town of Farmville implement Option A, and also conduct a comprehensive traffic study of South Main Street from Third Street to Griffin Boulevard.

Advantages • New traffic circle would enhance truck movements and reduce congestion at the turnaround point.

• Sawdust trucks could deliver their cargo without blocking Madison Street.

Sawdust trucks would have direct access to the sawdust delivery point at the New Heating Plant.

Overall truck access to Madison Street would not be restricted.

Disadvantages • Open space to the east of the New Heating Plant would be lost.

I~ _JI Legend

•••••

New Sidewalk New Crosswalk New Traffic Signal

Figure # 46 Option B, Madiso

-

D . ' fr {

.

--:

-

�

66

I Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

0

�

Construct a new traffic circle at the western end of Madison Street to retain access to the Dining Hall while providing sufficient space for trucks to easily turn around. Construct a roadway on the north and east sides of the Old Heating Plant to allow the sawdust delivery trucks to reach the New Heating Plant without blocking traffic on Madison Street.

Option B

�

,. _

Legend --• Proposed New Roadway

Advantages: • New traffic circle would enhance truck movements and reduce congestion at the turnaround point.

• Sawdust trucks could deliver their cargo without blocking Madison Street.

Overall truck access to Madison Street would not be restricted.

• The open space to the east of the New Heating Plant would be preserved .

Figure # 47 Option A, Madison Street Truck Traffic Figure # 48 Option B , Madison Street Truck Traffic

Disadvantages: Sawdust trucks would have to travel beyond the traffic circle and behind Coyner Hall to reach the north side of the Old Heating Plant.

• Sawdust trucks would not have direct access to the sawdust delivery point at the New Heating Plant.

RECOMMENDATION • Option A - Construct a new traffic circle and a roadway around the New Heating Plant.

.,,fl"

....... ...... .... ....

Concepts and Alternatives - Vehicular Circulation and Parking VENABLE STREET AND SOUTH MAIN STREET Y-JUNCTION

SPRUCE AND REDFORD T-JUNCTION TRUCK AND BUS TRAFFIC

Issue • Vehicles turning left onto South Main Street from Venable Street create a traffic hazard due to a sharp angles and low visibility.

Issue • The only access to Willett, Curry, and Frazer Halls for large trucks and buses is via East Redford Street and Spruce Street.

However, this area has insufficient turning, backing, and parking space for these vehicles. Pedestrian/vehicle conflicts abound.

Option

• Prohibit the left turn traffic movement at this location.

• Add sidewalks and crosswalks as shown in the graphic below.

Advantages •

Increases traffic capacity and safety at the location.

•

None.

Disadvantages

Option A

• Close Spruce Street to general vehicular traffic. Construct a turn-around traffic circle at the northern tip of Spruce Street with a minimum turning path accommodating both intermediate semitrailers and transit buses.

Advantages

Pedestrian/vehicular eliminated.

conflicts

on

Spruce

Street

are

Dis advantages

RECOMMENDATION • Request that the town of Farmville prohibit left turn traffic movement from Venable Street onto South Main Street.

Longwood should also consider developing a coordinated plan with Farmville to close Venable Street to vehicle traffic from Madison Street southbound to South Main Street, particularly if the intersection of Madison and South Main streets is signalized. c osing fVenable icular fucre

Option C

• Keep Spruce Street open to general vehicular traffic and construct a turn-around traffic circle at its south end, at the intersection with Hull Promenade, of sufficient size to accommodate intermediate semitrailers and transit busses.

However, this option is not possible because a traffic circle large enough to meet the turning requirements will not fit in the available space at the southern end of Spruce Street.

Therefore, this option was not considered.

RECOMMENDATION Close Spruce Street to general vehicular traffic, and implement either Option A or Option B. • Figure #50 shows the existing conditions in the Spruce Street area, and also illustrates a pos_sible design for a traffic circle in that area.

• Eliminates direct vehicle access to Willett, Curry, Frazer, and Hull Halls.

Removes 40 parking spaces from Spruce Street.

. Close Spruce Street to general vehicular traffic. Construct a turn-around traffic circle at the former T-junction of Redford and Spruce Street with minimum turning path accommodating both intermediate semitrailers and transit buses.

Option B

Advantages

Figure # 49 Venable Street and South Main Street Legend --• New Sidewalk X Prohibited Left Turn

• Trucks and buses have efficient and safe access and sufficient turning area.

Pedestrian/vehicular conflicts on Spruce Street are eliminated.

Disadvantages

• Eliminates direct vehicle access to Willett, Curry, Frazer, and Hull Halls.

Removes 40 parking spaces from Spruce Street.

c osed ehicul open to / emer

••••• ••••• -

Roadway Abandonment New Crosswalk New Sidewalk

Figure # 50 Spruce Street and Redford Street

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

67

Concepts and Alternatives - Vehicular Circulation and Parking GRIFFIN BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS Design Issues Griffin Boulevard defines the main western boundary of the campus, but does not project a clear or strong Longwood identity. It is a public two-lane street with a curb-to-curb width of 42 feet (see images at right) . The average 2006 daily traffic volume was 5,800, and the posted speed limit is 30 mph. There is no on-street parking allowed on either side of the northern section of the street.

W hile Griffin Boulevard constitutes a campus edge, it is also an internal part of the campus. It provides several major vehicular and pedestrian entry points to the campus, and two major campus parking lots are located across this street from campus. Residential neighbors adjacent to Griffin Boulevard generate significant pedestrian traffic, since many faculty, staff, and students reside there, within walking distance of campus. However, sidewalks are present only along the eastern side of the street.

Pedestrian crossings are few in number and are not ADA compliant, and there are no bicycle route markings.

Design Objectives The key design objectives for the road are

Reduce average speed along the roadway.

Improve the comfort and safety of pedestrians walking along and crossing the street.

Create a streetscape environment that signals an entrance to an educational institution.

Provide facilities allowing for a safe bicycling environment.

The key design criteria supporting these objectives include Use a combination of traffic calming tools to slow down traffic • Reduce the posted speed limit to 25 mph.

• Incorporating bicycle lanes along one or both sides

• Install a raised crosswalk with in-pavement flashing lights at the W heeler/Cox lot crossing to campus.

• Install bulbouts or curb extensions (image at right, bottom left) or traffic bollards (image at right, bottom right) at the southeast corner of Griffin Boulevard and High Street to prevent vehicles from driving over the curb and encroaching on the pedestrian waiting area.

• Provide a six-foot wide sidewalk on the west side where no sidewalk currently exists.

• Provide pedestrian crossing at all intersections to increase pedestrian safety and discourage pedestrian from crossing midblock.

• Install four-way stop signs at the following intersections with Griffin Boulevard: Madison, Redford, and Franklin streets.

68 I'

Install pedestrian-scale lighting on both sides of the street.

Increase the number of bus shelters, and mark transit stops.

Bury overhead utility lines.

• Consider small neighborhood traffic circles (examples on page 69) at the following intersections with Griffin Boulevard: Madison, Redford, and Franklin streets.

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

.

Concepts and Alternatives - Vehicular Circulation and Parking Initial Design Options Several roadway design options were considered 4 lanes, undivided 2-lanes with a center lane the entire length 2-lanes with small neighborhood roundabouts at key intersections 2 lanes with on-street parking the entire length 2-lanes without on-street parking.

Final Design Options Conceptual sketches of the proposed traffic calming and pedestrian safety improvements along Griffin Boulevard are shown in Figures 5 1 & 52. These graphics illustrate the two final design options that were chosen. The graphics include the proposed mid-block raised crosswalk.

Figure # 5 1 , Traffic Calming Option A

Option A (Figure # 5 1 ) 9 foot travel lanes 5 foot marked bicycle lane on each side 8 foot sidewalk on each side 3 foot planting strip on each side Option B (Figure # 52) 9 foot travel lanes 7 foot on-street parking on both sides 8 foot sidewalk on each side 3 foot planting strip on each side RECOMMENDATION

Figure # 5 Calming

Implement Option A 9 foot travel lanes 5 foot marked bicycle lane on each side 8 foot sidewalk on each side 3 foot planting strip on each side Make the following additional improvements: Reduce the posted speed limit from 30 to 25 mph.

Install a raised crosswalk with in-pavement Hashing lights at the Wheeler/Cox lot crossing to campus.

• Add crosswalks on all sides of each intersection.

Install four-way stop signs at the following intersections with Griffin Boulevard: Madison, Redford, and Franklin streets.

Bury overhead utility lines.

Add trees along both sides of the street to create a tree canopy and improve the visual appearance of the corridor.

Note: All changes must be coordinated with, and approved by, the town of Farmville.

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

69

Development of the Plan @

Concepts and Alternatives - Vehicular Circulation and Parking FUTURE PARKING SUPPLY

The implementation of the proposed master plan will result in the closure of certain streets or parts thereof, resulting in the loss of on-street parking at various locations on campus, including Spruce Street, Pine Street, and Race Street. Furthermore, new construction will replace some existing parking lots, further reducing parking supply. The proposed new construction projects and additions to existing buildings will result in the loss of 1 ,058 spaces. The major losses are associated with construction of the Convocation Center and extension of Brock Commons to Wynne Drive. These projects would essentially eliminate all Wynne Drive lots, and the Hooper Street lot. In addition, the closure of the northerly extensions of East and West Madison Street would lead to the closure of several more parking lots. These parking losses would reduce the total number of parking spaces to approximately 1 ,200.

Table #53 . 1 shows the anticipated parking losses associated with the proposed changes to·the main campus.

.

Locat10n

Bristow Lot Chambers Craft Lot Franklin Street Lot Government School Lot Hooper Street Lot Jarman Lot Main Street Lot Pine Street Pine Street Lot Race Street Race Street Lot Small Business Lot (gravel) Small Business Lot (paved) Spruce Street Tabb Circle Upper Frazer Wynne (south of Wynn Drive) Wynne Gravel Wynne Tiers Wygal Lot Various on-street parking Percent Losses

Total Losses

~

70

Table # 53. 1 , Parking Reconciliation

Spaces Lost 17 23 26 8 69 59 87 17 33 35 27

44

12 38

4

27 1 05 55 1 66 1 67 35

4

1058 46%

Reason for Loss

Partial loss due to new construction Street abandonment Parking deck or new construction Street abandonment Street abandonment New construction Street abandonment Parking deck Street abandonment Street abandonment Partial loss due to library extension Street abandonment New construction New construction Street abandonment Street abandonment Partial loss due to new construction New construction Parking deck Convocation Center New construction New construction

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Potential Parking Sites

Longwood will need to provide additional parking to meet future demand, due to both population growth and displaced surface lots. At present, there is one small parking garage located beneath Brock Commons, but it contains only 6.5 percent of all campus parking spaces. In the future, at least two larger parking decks or surface lots will be required, on and/or off campus. One approach would be to construct one each at the northern and southern ends of campus. An alternative would be to construct a few large surface lots on the campus periphery.

Several proposed sites are shown in Figure # 53. For a full description and discussion of alternatives see the transportation report listed in the Appendix.

Deck l

One obvious site for a deck is the eastern side of South Main Street at the Wynne Drive intersection. It is currently partially occupied by a freshman parking area. Additional adjacent land for this deck would have to be acquired by the university. This facility, with a potential capacity of up to 1 ,500 spaces, could serve both the campus and the Convocation Center.

This site has good access from both the north and south along South Main Street, and would not bring vehicle traffic to the campus core.

•• • •• ••

Concepts and Alternatives Vehicular Circulatiol) and Parking Deck 2

Off Campus Surface Parking

This site, currently the location of the Bristow building and parking lot, would be an excellent choice to serve the eastern and central sections of the campus. The building could house the Public Safety Department on the ground level. The deck's height should be limited to five or six levels due to its proximity to the campus' historic core. The benefits of this location include: Good vehicular access from South Main, Venable, and Putney streets.

Lancer Park is an obvious location on which to construct a large surface parking area. This site would have good pedestrian connectivity to campus once the vehicle and pedestrian bridges from Lancer Park to West Third Street and Grove Street have been constructed. A lot in this location could potentially accommodate nearly 1000 vehicles.

This lot would serve on-campus and Lancer Park residents, commuter students, and possible staff personnel. The benefits of this location include: Excellent vehicular access from West Third Street.

Within walking distance of most of the central and eastern sections of campus.

Good access to campus via multiple means - pedestrian, bicycle, and shuttle bus.

The land is already university property

• The land is owned by the Longwood University Real Estate Foundation.

4.0f

a

Deck 3 This site, at the corner of Buffalo and St. George streets, is an excellent choice to serve the northern section of the campus.

However, it is also an equally obvious candidate for a building or green space. Due to the historic Longwood buildings across High Street, and the residential character of the surrounding area, the deck's height should be limited to no more than five levels. The benefits of this location include: Good vehicular access from High, Oak, South Main, and West Third streets.

Within walking distance of the northern and central sections of campus.

Offers direct access to Brock Commons - the pedestrian spine ot the campus.

The land is already university property.

RECOMMENDATION The off-campus surface parking site is recommended due to its proximity to campus, availability, and comparatively low cost of construction compared to the deck options. A surface lot at this location will accommodate the parking deficit created by future campus construction projects and street closures. This choice will be much less of a long-term financial burden to Longwood than constructing a parking deck.

'ii

Convocation Center And Parking Besides Longwood athletic events, it is envisioned that the Convocation Center will host conventions, trade shows, meetings, consumer shows, concerts, and other special events. The parking requirements to support this facility will emerge when the seating capacity is determined.

-d

0

aO :

0

:'

,

a

C:

0

C,

0

c:,

/'J o

Figure # 53, Potential Parking Sites

- Existing garage - Proposed site

71 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Concepts and Alternatives - Open Spaces and Pedestrian Circulation

§

� �

Cl.)

� �

0 Cl.) �

0

� Cl.)

>

Cl.)

�

PEDESTRIAN PLAN

An important component of the master plan is to enhance and improve the existing comprehensive pedestrian network on campus, and to expand the car-free pedestrian zone. Campus streets should be designed with pedestrians in mind, rather than motor vehicles alone. Sidewalks and paths on campus should have no missing links or evident conflict points with vehicles. Intersection crossings should be easy to cross and safe to use. Pedestrian amenities, such as benches, shade trees, and properly scaled lighting should be plentiful. Connections to campus from nearby neighborhoods, as well as connections to crucial off-campus sites, should be well established and complete.

The enlargement of the pedestrian area on main campus, as shown in Figure # 54, would substantially increase primary pedestrian corridors in the future. Extending Brock Commons will result in more pedestrian activity in the southern end of campus. The new promenade connecting to Brock Commons Venable Street and further to Mid-Town Square would fill in the missing link in the primary west­ east pedestrian corridor on campus. The proposed internal street closures would increase pedestrian activity and create two additional north-south pedestrian primary corridors: the first one extending from Jarman Hall to Bedford Hall (mostly following former Race Street), and the second one from Ruffner = �- Expande estrian Hall to the Health and - Primary Pedestrian Pat Fitness Center (following Secondary Pedestrian _, former Spruce Street) .

Figure # 54, Proposed The addition of the Pedestrian Paths and Convocation Center at Zones

.

72

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

the southern end of campus would also increase pedestrian traffic along Wynne Drive. Proposed future primary and secondary corridors are also shown in Figure # 54. Creating a campus environment that is more walkable will require pedestrian improvements. These are shown in Figure #55 and discussed in more detail below.

In terms of pedestrian improvements, Longwood should consider making the following improvements:

Install raised crosswalks at the following locations: • Across High Street connecting St. George Street and Brock Commons.

- Across West Redford Street between Lankford Mall and the Library.

• Across Venable Street between campus and Longwood Landings.

• Implement the street improvements listed under Vehicular Circulation, including pedestrian safety improvements on High Street, South Main Street, and Griffin Boulevard.

w connection m Brock

• Install flashing crosswalks along the campus portion of South Main Street, High Street, and Griffin Boulevard.

• Install brick crosswalks of uniform design at all pedestrian crossings on all internal campus and town streets bordering the campus - typical designs are shown in the images below.

• W here not currently installed, add pedestrian-activated signalized crossings at all major intersections.

• Fill in missing links in the campus sidewalk system. construct new sidewalks at the following locations:

Specifically,

• North side of Wynne Drive.

• East side of Race Street, from V ine Street to the Ballfields.

• South side of East Madison Street.

• Along both sides of Vine Street.

• West side of Griffin Boulevard.

••

· Other locations as shown in Figure #55

0

e # 55 Prop destrian Improv

"' f �

,

Legend IJ • • • • Newcrosswatk

• • ■ ■ Raisedcrosswa tk New sidewalk

■ ■ ■ ■ Pedestrianized streets

-

New streets

•• •• •• •I

I I I

Concepts and Alternatives - Open Spaces and Pedestrian Circulation - Across East Redford Street between Spruce Street and the Dining Hall.

• Across Griffin Boulevard between campus and the Cox and Wheeler parking lots.

Alternatively, a crossing table at grade could work just as well at this location.

It is important to make this crossing as safe for pedestrians as possible due to the high number of anticipated pedestrian and motor vehicle conflicts at this location (due to extending Brock Commons, and the proposed Convocation Center) . Crossing tables differ from raised crosswalks in that they are wider and can accommodate a larger number of pedestrians. The examples of the type of alternative roadway texture treatments Wynne Drive could receive at this location are shown below.

• Implement the system of multi-use paths, as outlined in the Pedestrian Plan section of the Campus Transportation Report. The minimum width of the multi-use path should be 1 4 feet on primary pedestrian corridors, and 1 0 feet on secondary pedestrian corridors (includes a 6 feet bicycling/ golf cart lane) The design is flexible, but should separate pedestrians and bicyclists/ golf carts onto two separate lanes that could optionally be separated by physical boundary or landscaping. Stamped, colored pavement could be used in lieu of bricks as well, particularly once maintenance costs and ADA­ accessibility are factored in.

A variation of multi-use pathways is shown in the images below. This is a 1 4-foot wide concrete off-street pathway that can also accommodate pedestrians, bicycles, and golf carts. Golf carts can use the same section of the path as bicycles.

A typical plan showing in-paver flashing lights, pedestrian push button, and LED pedestrian crossing signs is shown in Figure #56.

• Improve off-campus pedestrian connections to the following locations: • To Lancer Park, via pedestrian bridges, as shown on page

64.

• Longwood Golf Course and the Johnston Drive athletic fields, by working with the town of Farmville to install sidewalks and lighting along Longwood Avenue.

• Install pedestrian-scale lighting on all internal campus streets and all streets bordering campus (South Main Street, Venable Street, Griffin Boulevard, and High Street).

• The following pedestrian safety/traffic calming tools can be used in various combinations at any location where deemed necessary and appropriate.

I

PEDESTRIAN 1 PUSH IIUTTQt-..1 I

Example:

r- H'+PA\IER Fl.ASHING UGH1S

Construct a pedestrian skyway at the following location: • Over West Redford Street, connecting the Library with the proposed annex and Student Success Center.

�// . Raised crosswalk with special paving material

• In-paver Bashing lights. This fixture is flush mounted on pavement surface and Rashes to warn approaching traffic of pedestrian's crossing.

The device can be activated by laser or manual push button. . Realign pedestrian crossings at the following intersections to provide shorter crossing distances: . South Main Street and East Redford Street.

. High Street and Griffin Boulevard.

• LED pedestrian crossing sign. This device is located near crosswalks and warns drivers of the presence of pedestrians. It can be scheduled to flash continuously or at specific hours.

• Light fixtures located dose to crosswalks to provide sufficient light at night.

I

CAMPUS STANDARD PAVERS __j SCOR. ED COf'.ICRETE STAMPED ASPHALT

Figure # 56, Pedestrian Crossing

\L

cot--K:RETE BAN DING

'-- LED PEDESTR .IAN

CROSSING SIGN

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

73

@ Concepts and Alternatives - Housing STUDENT HOUSING Issue Longwood's guidance is to house 60% of 5600 undergraduate students in university-controlled housing (3360), with 2000 of those in on-campus residence halls. After the demolition of the Cunningham residence halls, and conversion of Tabb, South Ruffner, and French residence halls to other uses, an additional 485 on-campus and 4 10 university apartment beds will be required by 2020.

•

Options The following options were considered: A. Longwood Village B. Lancer Park C. Adjacent to ARC Residence Hall D. Replacement of Curry and Frazer Residence Halls

RECOMMENDATIONS A combination of Sites A and B - expansion of Longwood Village and Lancer Park apartments for off-campus housing, and Site C - adjacent to ARC Residence Hall for on-campus housing.

B

Lancer Park

A

74

Figure # 58 Pre iminary Sketch, Residential D

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•• •• • • •• ••

Concepts and Alternatives - Recreation and Athletic Facilities CONVOCATION CENTER

ATHLETICS /RECREATION - CONVOCATION CENTER

PRELI M INARY STUDY

Issue Longwood's guidance is that a convocation venue will be located on the main campus.

OPTION A

• CONSTRUCT A NEW CONVOCATIO 1 CENTER AT Tl-IE SOUTH END OF CAMPUS • NEW RECREATION FIELD • RELOCATE TENNIS CO RTS • PARK! G GARAGE

Option A This option constructs an approximately 160,000 gross square foot building at the southern end of an extended Brock Commons, along with re-aligning Wynne Drive.

Option B This option expands and renovates Willett Hall.

OPTION B •

EXPAND AND RENOVATE WILLETT HALL

•

NEW RECREATION FIELD

•

RELOCATE TENNIS COURTS

RECOMMENDATION Option A, because the Willett Hall site is too constrained for expansion and lacks sufficient vehicle and service access. Brock Commons should be extended to the new Convocation Center. Figure #6 1 presents a possible design.

Figure # 60 Development, Land and Buildings, Convocation Center

ATHLETICS/RECREATION - TENNIS Issue The existing tennis courts (behind French Hall and next to Willett Hall) must be relocated in order to carry out other master plan recommendations.

Options Option A - First Avenue Field Option B - Southern end of the main campus RECOMMENDATION Option B. This site is closer and more convenient for students and instructors. A general recreation field should also be sited at the southern end of campus, in the vicinity of the Convocation Center and tennis courts.

75 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

�

... _._ ,_ _t _t. t_ '- '

,_, .!

The Final Plan VII

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

77

,, Landscaping, Entrances, Gateways, and Boundaries Longwood will preserve and maintain existing open spaces and landscaped areas.

Additionally, new areas will be converted into open and pedestrian landscaped zones.

These areas are subdivided into primary and secondary greening effort zones.

Primary • French Greenway and Plaza • Iler Field Improvements • New Residential Quad Greenway • Spruce Street Greenway • Brock Commons Extension Secondary • Bicentennial Park • Madison Street Greening • Stevens Greenway and Plaza • Admissions Greenway connection

□ /I If d

==:0 �

□

v 9g3� o o □DO Q0D[J0 o

O a

D

\

;• 0=o

O IJ o U D ci

0

~

0

c;i

ENTRANCES, GATEWAYS, AND BOUNDARIES Boundaries are defined through specific treatments of the campus edges. A combination of varying scales of traffic signals, crosswalk devices, landscapes, and hardscapes will delineate the approaches to campus from both vehicular entrances and pedestrian gateways.

• Primary Greening Effort

0 Secondary Greening Effort • Primary Pedestrian Gateway

0 Secondary Pedestrian Gateway

[tJo

11 1, q

Primary Vehicular Entrance Secondary or Service Entrance

Figure # 62 Final Plan, Landsca

78 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

0

o CT

Q

ljJ

D

0

\LCJ =1�o�O�"�"�"�"'�"l�=;/ /�d er� \~ Q 000 ° (1 D \ 0I

[]

D

a

1 000 feet

,-- •

..• • ..

fl'

LANDSCAPING

0

•• • •• ••• •

Land Use Analysis 0% 1 0%

25%

EXISTI G BUILDING FOOTPRI T 2 1 % URFACE PARKI G

1 %

ROADS & I DEWALKS 2 1 % PROGRAMMED OPE

SPACE l l o/c

PROGRAMMED OPE

40% 50%

@

The 2008 Master Plan at its full build out will increase University property boundaries from approximately 60 acres to 100 acres. Proportionately, surface parking will occupy a mere 1% of the campus grounds. The impervious surfaces such as buildings, roadways and sidewalks will increase 3%, while the unprogrammed open space increases 4%. Despite the increase in building footprints and program the percentage of programmed open space is well maintained at 1 1%.

Considerable attention has been afforded to ensure that the quality as well as the quantity of open green space was well maintained and elaborated upon. Through the new and improved pedestrian green spaces and reallocation of building program, the campus better utilizes and showcases the many natural and built environments it has to offer.

I

~--) ,,/,

II

I(

~"'-~.,__ '·

~ 1 000 feet

79 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

@ Floor Area Ratios

The majori ty o f Longwood's facilities expansion will be sited in the southern section of campus, resulting in an overall Floor Area Ratio of .7, which translates to 2-4 story structures. More than 450,000 gross square feet of new space will be added to this area for academic, athletics, student life, and residential functions. A convocation center and a new housing quad will attract a wide diversity of students, faculty, staff, and visitors to this area.

The northwest quadrant of campus maintains its current density through appropriate massing of the new Student Union building. The expansion of Lankford will also be in keeping with existing densi ty proportions while adding to campus functionali ty and adjacency.

.

- �

n n \J

Campus Average FAR .65

=�={] 'ti D

�0

0

[J

oO

OD

"" "

D

UD 0

o \]

d dP \Q ,□

\7 D,.,

ooO O GJ () 0

. -□ --

Ll

The master plan arranges the new higher-densi ty buildings in a way that maximizes their orientation for natural ventilation and lighting, and maintains efficient building adjacencies.

The plan also modulates the massing to maintain open space and compatibility with Longwood's residential campus context.

- North West Quadrant 0.8 0 ���� North East Quadrant 0.8 South West Quadrant 0.6 South East Quadrant 1 .0 Athletic Quadrant 0.2 Figure # 64 Final Plan, Floor Area Ratios

80

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

D a a::

D

Building Adj acency

@

The future campus adjacency arrangement evolved from a careful review of space needs, user perceptions, current and future requirements, and overall university trends. The final arrangement maintains and supports a balance of the historic character and traditions of the existing campus with the needs and expectations of today's student body.

Housing Library Institutional Support Student Union Athletic / Recreation Food Service 'iJ

□ -

0 ..

0 0 ' Cl - C> □r- ob O c;)

OaCJ_? c;, (1 D

"

0 Oo

·

000

,1

D

-

D • D {Jo'O

I

•

□O Longwood V illage

Lancer Park

Golf Course

81

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan

Revision 1- March 2012

Ii

@ Building Proj ect Summary New Construction Renovation Long Term Renovation New / Updated Landscaping

- c:::;

34

•..•..• . .. �.• •...•

Longwood Village ..

82

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan Revision 1 - March 2012

1. Additional Off-Campus Student Housing at Longwood Village and/or Lancer Park 2. New Student Union Building 3. Stevens Greenway and Plaza 4. West Madison Street Traffic Circle 5. Stevens Building 6. New Physical Plant Building 7. Parking Lot at Lancer Park 8. French Building Renovation and Greenway/Plaza 9. Tennis Courts Phase I 10. Admissions Office/Visitors Information Center 1 1. South Ruffner Building Renovation 12. Iler Field Improvements 13. Library Expansion/Renovation 14. Lankford Expansion/Renovation 15. Stubbs Residence Hall Renovation 16. Additional On-Campus Student Housing 17. Vine Street Traffic Circle 18. Performing Arts Center 19. East Redford Street Traffic Circle 20. Spruce Greenway and Plaza 2 1. Public Safety and University Services Building 22. East Madison Street Traffic Circle 23. Tennis Courts Phase II 24. Wygal Building Renovation 25. Hull Building Annex 26. Hull Building Renovation 27. HRK Addition and Renovation 28. Brock Commons Extension 29. Barlow Building Renovation 30. Blackwell Building Renovation/Alumni Center 3 1. Aquatics Building 32. ARC Residence Hall Renovation 33. Graham Building Renovation 34. Golf Course Renovation 35. New Academic Building 36. Possible South Tabb Building Renovation 37. Convocation Center 38. Potential Institutional Support 39. Coyner Renovation 40. Blackwell Greenway and Plaza 4 1. Longwood Center for the Visual Arts

Vehicular Circulation

• Construct new traffic circles at the intersection of East Redford Street and Spruce Street, at the ends of East a_nd West Madison Streets, and at the intersection of Vine Street and Race Street.

Short-term and handicapped parking spaces could also be created around these circles.

OVERALL RECOMMENDATIONS

One of the master plan's main goals is to promote sustainability. The plan envisions the internal campus as a mostly pedestrian area, with walking and bicycling as the main transportation modes. Therefore, the plan proposes street closures and reconfigurations to create a pedestrian-oriented environment. The campus will become more walkable by relegating motor vehicles largely to its edges and beyond.

-

The following changes to the existing street configuration are recommended:

r:-

!J.

0 0

The recommended campus circulation pattern is shown in Figure #67.

Figure #67 also delineates streets proposed for abandonment by the Town of Farmville to the university.

'b :;;.

0

~~

�

�

0� :·0

I,

r~

• Wynne Drive - Extend from Race Street to Griffin Boulevard.

This extension will create a much needed east-west connection in the southern area of campus and improve access to the proposed convocation center. The existing segment of Wynne Drive from South Main Street to Race Street should be reconstructed to provide better access to the proposed convocation center.

\,o

r )

0

L

. Construct a direct access from East Redford Street into the

a •

11 ' •• ,I\_J

\'•

·-

0 �

� -�--- � !7>�':J' O j , ':,

·jr m 1

,,

,

!

Q

0

0

C Q

ni� ri~

n /ref !J s

.,

• Construct a new street around the New Heating Plant.

••

V

/4

C

• Race Street - Close to vehicles from West Redford Street to Vine Street and convert to a greenway and plaza.

• .-

..

'

0

• East Chambers Street and Tabb Circle - Close to vehicular traffic and incorporate into the Blackwell and French Greenways and Plazas.

visitor parking lot serving the new Public Safety and University Services Building.

vr-

-r·

• Spruce Street - Close to vehicles and convert to a greenway and plaza along its entire length (from East Redford Street to Hull Promenade) .

r--r-

• Construct a cul-de-sac at the northeast corner of Hiner Hall, with vehicular access to Graham Parking Lot.

--·-·:n, f-;

t,

fsYJ

Peripheral Streets Campus Access Streets New Streets Proposed for Abandonment by Town of Farmville Closed co Vehicles

83 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Vehicular Circulation EMERGENCYVEHICLE AND DELIVERY ACCESS The master plan envisions a campus that is mostly free of vehicles. However, the closure and/or reconfiguration of streets may pose challenges to provid­ ing emergency access to certain areas of campus. Access for emergency and delivery vehicles, as well as wheelchairs, must be carefully considered. The present campus affords excellent access for emergency vehicles (Figure #68).

The following routes are recommended for emergency vehicle access in the future (Figure #69) : Brock Commons Fire trucks may drive on Brock Commons, except on the portion directly over the parking garage, and on Hull Promenade.

Access is good during dry conditions, but may become difficult during wet weather.

Access routes: • Directly from High Street at the north end • Madison Street East to area behind Hiner/Coyner to Beale Plaza

• Directly from Madison Street West in the center • Race Street to Franklin Street to the south end

Other Areas Interior campus areas and buildings • Madison Street East to the area behind Hiner/Coyner to Blackwell and French Plazas . Madison Street East to the New Heating Plant circumference street

• Madison Street West to Stevens Greenway and Plaza

0

0 0 0 0

• Redford Street East to Spruce Greenway and Plaza

• Redford Street West to the greenway and plaza in front of the new resident hall quad --• Access streets ■ ■ ■ ■ Emergency vehicles __ only One-way streets

84

E,mergency Service Access

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

• Race Street to Franklin Street to Hull Promenade

Exterior areas and buildings • Directly from High Street

• Directly from Venable Street

• Directly from South Main Street • Directly from Griffin Blvd.

--• Access streets • • • • Emergency vehicles only One-way streets Figure # 69, Proposed Emergency Service Access

Parking LANCER PARK SURFACE PARKING A parking lot of nearly 1000 parking spaces could be constructed at Lancer Park. This location would serve as the primary parking for residents of Lancer Park, for commuter students, and for overflow from the main campus. The new pedestrian bridge will facilitate a safe 10 minute walk to the main campus.

~

~

\

I

(D

I

/

i

/

~ ~~

I

~

~

PARKING DEMAND REDUCTION

~

The traditional approach to parking management has been to meet the demand by offering sufficient supply. Adding parking has been the answer to growth experienced by campuses. However, this approach is no longer the preferred one, and more universities are moving toward a philosophy of reducing parking demand. Longwood University has the added limitation of its constrained space that could be utilized for a variety of institutional uses rather than parking. In addition, in line with Longwood University's sustainability initiative, it is crucial to recognize that increased parking supply conflicts with efforts to reduce driving and promote alternative modes of transportation.

Notwithstanding sustainability efforts, financing future parking needs is a problem in itself. The cost qf constructing one parking deck space is at least $ 1 5,000 (including contingency and bond issue costs). The total annual cost to cover the debt service and to operate and maintain a parking deck is approximately $ 1 ,500 per space annually. Assuming annual revenue of $250 per space reduces the net annual cost to $ 1 ,250. Constructing decks to meet the projected future parking shortfall of nearly 1,800 spaces would cost $27 million in today's dollars, and parking permit fees might have to be raised. Given higher parking fees, some people will find alternate parking options or travel modes.

In lieu of meeting future parking demand with supply, the recommended alternative consists of first reducing the demand for parking on campus by promoting and offering different ways of getting to and around campus. The goal is to enable transportation modes other than the private automobile to emerge as an equally attractive alternative. Improved walking and cycling conditions, extended and more convenient transit, park-and-ride, and ridesharing are some of the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) techniques that could be utilized to achieve that goal. The projected long­ term need for parking could also be lowered by augmenting the listed TDM strategies with lowering the ratio of parking spaces on campus. Page

~

~ Lancer Park

~

Figure # 70, Final Plan, Lancer Park 49 of this document shows the significant reduction in parking demand achieved by lowering the current parking ratio for student commuters only from 0.32 to 0.25 in the future.

Figure # 7 1 Final Plan, Walking Circles 5 minute walking circles c::J 1 0 minute walking circle c::J

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•

@)

85

@ Parking § ,....... ~ ~

.

ro

= �

�

Q)

,.Q ~

...

OVERALL PARKING POLICY In the long-term, as Longwood University grows and campus density increases, an overall policy related to parking and transportation should be adopted. Although providing adequate and convenient parking will be necessary in the future, that goal should not be attained at the expense of limiting open space, compromising pedestrian safe ty, or harming Longwood's historic character. The elements of the proposed parking strategic policy are as follows: • Minimize the need for constructing additional parking facilities on campus through Transportation Demand Management strategies (T DM) .

• Locate additional future parking on the campus' periphery.

• Avoid constructing surface parking lots within the main campus core area.

On-campus parking should be managed in accordance with a hierarchy of needs: • Handicapped and service spaces should have the highest priority, since they need to be closest to building and facility entrances.

• Short-duration parking, including visitor parking, should have the next priority, reflecting the necessity to support short­ duration visits. Priority parking for carpoolers and vanpoolers should also be in this category.

• Faculty/staff and commuter student parking should have the next priority.

• Resident student parking should have the lowest priority, since resident students generally use their cars less frequently than daily commuters.

These parking policies will support the concept of converting surface parking lots and some streets to pedestrian and open space, further enhancing the appearance of the campus and the educational experience of Longwood's students. As these changes occur, special attention must be given to pedestrian walkways connecting the remaining or new parking facilities to all parts of the campus. Sufficient lighting,

86

emergency phone boxes, security patrols, convenient routing, and maximum visibility are some of the traits of a successful campus walkway.

ZONE BASED PARKING SYSTEM It is recommended that Longwood consider changing at least some of its parking allocation from a category-based system to a zone-based system. This change could allow more parking options at differing price levels, and would reduce the need for drivers to hunt for spaces across the entire campus.

Parking in zones could still be split between resident students and commuters, and further delineated into open and reserved spaces.

Under this concept, a premium rate should be charged for spaces closer to the campus core. Currently, a parking permit costs the same whether a commuter parks in the campus core or in the far southern portion of campus, even though the drivers' desire for remote spaces is much less than for core campus spaces. Under the proposed system, a permit for areas located further away from the campus core would remain at the current cost, while the cost of permits for parking in the campus core would increase. A zone-based system is expected to not only better distribute parking demand, but also increase revenue in the future. Longwood should also consider incrementally increasing parking permit costs to cover the actual costs of the parking system, including the cost of constructing, operating, and maintaining new parking areas.

in those instances wherever a parking lot does not serve a particular building (i.e. Jarman Hall would no longer be served by the Jarman lot because of its removal) "accessible parking shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel to an accessible pedestrian entrance." Thus, accessible parking spaces from removed parking lots should be moved to any remaining or new parking facility nearest the affected buildings.

OTHER POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS In order to further reduce future parking demand over the long term, Longwood should consider additional limits on who can obtain a parking permit. These limits could involve prohibiting sophomore students from bringing their cars to campus, and prohibiting students who live within walking distance to campus or Farmville Area Bus transit stops from obtaining a permit. As previously discussed, charging a higher fee for more convenient parking locations, or a lower fee for more remote locations, should also be considered.

.. . .. .. .. .

ADA ACCESSIBILITY AND HANDICAPPED PARKING As parking is removed from the campus core, sufficient parking must

be maintained in the core area for handicapped people and service vehicles. This requirement should constitute a key component of building and surrounding area design.

Closure of internal campus streets will result in loss of some parking lots along with any accessible parking spaces assigned to those lots.

Federal Regulations mandate that accessible parking spaces serving particular buildings should be located "on the shortest accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance." However,

=================================================================================;:: Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

Bicycle Plan BICYCLING TO CAMPUS Bicycles are an important transportation mode on many campuses throughout the country. They are a truly sustainable mode of transportation - non-polluting, efficient, and inexpensive, and their use results in less traffic congestion and lower parking demand.

.... ...

-----

Proposed Trails Existing Trails Dogwood Trails (paved) High Bridge Trail (proposed-Rails to Trails)

- - - On-street lanes

•� .,.

Ridership to and around Longwood is currently very low. The rolling terrain is a deterrent to bicycle use. The campus and the Town of Farmville also lack formal bicycle facilities, bike route signage, and other amenities such as bicycle parking (including lockers) and bicycle repair shops, further reducing the appeal of bicycling.

The major streets that lead to campus, including South Main Street, High Street, Griffin Boulevard, West Third Street, and Longwood Avenue all lack bicycle lanes, and have high traffic levels and speeds.

These factors deter potential bicyclists from riding to campus. Figure #72 depicts the current and proposed bicycle routes in the Farmville area. The Dogwood Trail is the only existing specific off-street bike path in Town, but it is currently not part of a complete system that would be useful to bicyclists riding to campus.

Legend

Legend

-

This master plan incorporates a bicycle plan to encourage and facilitate cycling to, from, and around campus. A full description of the bicycle plan is available in the Campus Transportation Elements Report (Appendix, Report 2).

- - - Off-street paths - - - Signed routes

, 'I

~

t,,,-,,l

§

A major goal of the master plan is to create transportation links between the core campus and significant off-campus sites - student housing areas and recreation/sports facilities. Convenient and safe bicycle routes will comprise a major element of these links.

Figure # 73 depicts proposed Farmville area bicycle routes by type. These proposed routes will provide connections to Lancer Park student apartments and recreation fields, Longwood Village student apartments, Longwood Avenue athletic fields, and Sunchase Apartments. Crucial improvements include signage, bicycle lanes, and possibly shared off-road paths, as well as the proposed bridges connecting Lancer Park with Grove Street .

. .,

REGIONAL BICYCLE PLANS The Town of Farmville has recommended adopting the Piedmont Regional Bicycle Plan, a long-term plan to improve bicycle transportation in the region. The Greater Farmville Greenway Alliance has proposed a series of greenways, blueways, walking trails, and bikeways throughout the Farmville area. These initiatives, combined with on-campus enhancements, will improve and expand the availability and convenience of bicycling as a viable transportation mode for the Longwood University community.

Figure # 73� Proposed Farmville Area Bicycle Routes by Type

87 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

I

@ Bicycle Plan § ~

~

~

crj

.~ ~

~ (1)

,..0 ~

Another concept that Longwood could consider is secured indoor parking.

This type of storage could be utilized by students, bicycle commuters, and faculty/staff member who would rather keep their bicycles stored inside.

An example of a secured indoor parking is shown in the image below. New buildings could incorporate shower and locker facilities to allow bicyclists the option of cleaning up after traveling to work. Bicycle stations, provid­ ing storage and repair facilities, often supported by a user fee, could be located at key locations across the campus.

EXISTING AND PROPOSED CAMPUS BICYCLE FACILITIES BICYCLE LANES, PATHS, AND ROUTES Currently, there are no signed bicycle routes or multi-use paths on campus.

While striped bicycle lanes are not recommended for campus streets, signed bicycle routes would establish effective travel patterns for bicyclists and im­ prove their visibility to drivers. Multi-use paths, on the other hand, provide internal accessibility within campus and provide a more pleasant bicycling experience while getting around Longwood's grounds.

BICYCLE EDUCATION AND PROMOTION

Proposed on-campus facilities are shown in Figure # 74. The two main bi­ cycle transportation spines on campus run north-south, roughly along Race Street on the western side of campus and along the former Spruce Street on the eastern side. Griffin Boulevard would constitute yet another major bicy­ cle artery, and on-street bicycle lanes would provide an opportunity for more experienced bicyclists to travel at faster speeds than allowed by the internal multi-use paths. The multi-use paths on campus would be paved, 1 0- to 14-feet wide, most with a separate lane for pedestrians and a mixed-use lane for bicycles and golf carts. A proposed campus golf cart circulation system is shown in the Campus Transportation Report (Appendix, Report 2).

In addition to making physical improvements, it is also important to in­

crease the information available to current and potential bicyclists. Long­ wood should develop and distribute a campus bicycle map. This map should show bicycle routes on and in the vicinity of the campus, and should differentiate between exclusive and shared facilities. The maps should also indicate where amenities for bicyclists are located, such as bike stations, and information on their use. Rules of the road and safety information should also be included. These maps could be distributed at information kiosks and bike shops near campus. This information could be sent to town and county offices for inclusion in their maps and information.

BICYCLE PARKING The campus in general, and the campus core in particular, needs more bicycle parking. Bicycle parking should be provided at the most-used entrances to major campus buildings, including student support and athletic facilities.

Longwood should also identify opportunities for covered bicycle parking to provide weather protection for both riders and bicycles. Covered parking can be incorporated into building overhangs, awnings, and breezeways. In ad­ dition, all future campus parking decks and or surfaces should have a desig­ nated and protected area for bicycle parking, allowing people who commute to campus by car to retrieve their bicycles for travel around campus.

88

Longwood should also adopt standards for bicycle parking. Currently, there are a variety of parking racks around campus. One type of bicycle parking that is easily recognizable and accepted nationwide, the U-Rack, is shown in the image in the below. This type can be ganged at 24 inch centers, holding two bicycles per each U. The most important design criteria for U-racks is leaving clear access space on both ends. Other designs could be explored - notably, many institutions incorporate metal art and sculptures to enhance the look of the bicycle parking area.

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

■ ■ • ■ ■ , Off-street paths On-street lanes Signed routes Optional access

•■■■

••• • •••••

Open Spaces and Pedestrian Circulation Install raised crosswalks at the following locatio�s:

RECOMMENDED PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS

• Across High Street connecting St. George Street and Brock Commons

(D

• Implement street improvements listed under the traffic circulation section of the campus transportation report (appendix, report 2) including pedestrian safety improvements on High Street, South Main Street, and Griffin Boulevard.

• Across High Street in the Jarman/Lancaster area (If a future High Street/Oak Street connector is constructed)

t,,,,,,,,& •

•

.. ..

• Across High Street at North Street • Across West Redford Street between the Library and Lankford Mall - Across Venable Street on the route from campus to Mid-Town Square

Implement proposed street abandonments and closures.

• Construct a promenade connecting Brock Commons to Venable Street and further to mid-town square.

• Across East Redford Street between Spruce Greenway and Iler Field

• Create two additional north-south primary pedestrian corridors: one extending from Jarman Hall to Franklin Street, and one from Ruffner Hall to the Health and Fitness Center.

• Across Griffin Boulevard between W heeler/Cox parking lots and campus

• Construct all required internal walkways associated with new construction on campus.

~

~

~

§

• South Main Street and Redford Street • High Street and Griffin Boulevard

• Install brick crosswalks of uniform design at pedestrian crossings on internal campus and town streets bordering the campus.

Install pedestrian-scale lighting on all internal campus streets and all streets bordering campus (South Main Street, Venable Street, Griffin Boulevard, High Street)

Construct new sidewalks along the following streets: • North side of Wynne Drive

RECOMMENDED OFF-CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS

• East side of Race Street, from Vine Street to the ball fields

Construct a pedestrian bridge connecting Lancer Park to Grove Street.

• Work with the Town of Farmville to install sidewalks and lighting along Longwood Avenue.

• South side of East Madison Street • Both sides of Vine Street . West side of Griffin Boulevard . Other locations shown in Figure 55

Q,,

'"o

0 [?

9i D II

C,

\:0

CJ

c::J

0

000 Primary Pedestrian Path

oooooo Secondary Pedestrian Path

Figure # 75, Final Plan, Open Space and Pedestrian Circulation

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

-

~

~

Realign the pedestrian crossings at the following locations:

• W here not currencly installed, add pedestrian-activated signalized crossings.

•• •• •• • •• •

~

• Across Wynne Drive at the southern end of Pine Street

• Construct a pedestrian skyway above West Redford Street to support the library expansion.

,.•

~

µ

ON- CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS

• Build the system of multi-use paths described in the Bicycle Plan section of this report.

~

@

---

89

@ Housing To meet the future student housing requirements, Longwood must construct 485 new beds on campus and 4 1 0 beds in university-managed apartment communities.

The on-campus requirement can best be met by constructing two new residence halls flanking ARC Residence Hall (Figures #76 and #78). This configuration will create a new quadrangle, resulting in additional green space and informal gathering places. The two new buildings will be sized to compensate for the loss of lounge and meeting rooms when the Cunningham Residence Halls are demolished.

Two university-managed apartment co�munities can be enlarged to create a total of 410 new off­ campus beds. The Longwood V illage community has the space and infrastructure to support additional buildings. The Lancer Park community will be within easy walking distance of campus after the completion of the new pedestrian bridge across West Third Street. A cost-effective combination of these two locations is recommended.

Figure # 78, Model Rendering, Housing 0

0

□

90

Housing .. ____......,......,.....__....._.______""-'""""""-.....---......__-...,___. Figure # 77 , Final Plan, .....,_,_' ___ Possible Additions to Longwood Village

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

4 t t t t

•

•• •• •• •• •• • •• • t t

•• •• •• •• •• •• •

-

-

Recreation & Athletic Facilities The NCAA has granted Longwood University Division I status, and Longwood's 1 4 teams are now competing in Division I. Many immediate needs of Longwood's athletic programs are being addressed by improvements and additions to existing facilities. The master plan recommends the construction of tennis courts and a natatorium that meet Division I standards.

Student recreation opportunities will be enhanced by the newly­ constructed fields at Lancer Park, improvements to Iler Field, and a new open field in the southern campus area. The golf course should be updated to better serve the golf teams and the entire community. This update should include a repositioned entrance, a new clubhouse and parking, a re-aligned and extended driving range, and re-aligned and renovated tees, fairways, and greens.

0 0

D 0e

Figure # 79, Model Rendering, Convocation· Center

0

o o· a

O a Dd 0

[',

o.

0 D {]

11

-a _Q.J. ""'O

Figure # 80, Final Plan, {Recreation & Athletics

CJ 0

[l c:::J

0

91 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

•• •

Infrastructure STEAM

The two boilers in the New Heating Plant totaling 40,000 pounds per hour capacity will be minimally sufficient to support the campus through the first phase of development. A third boiler should be installed as soon as possible to handle peak loads and growth. Consideration should be given to adding additional steam generation capacity in the future to provide redundancy and handle emergent projects.

Oo

0 0 GI (l D □

,....., u . ,,....-<~-

,, { U

''\~ r\ ' ' ., '?,J

COOLING

Air conditioning for ex1stmg buildings is provided by individual systems located within each building. The same approach is currently envisioned for new buildings.

However, consideration should be given to constructing a central chiller plant and a chilled water distribution system to leverage the efficiency of scale and the operational advantages of central control and monitoring.

"'"

:t

"

C

%

,.>

% 7<

r-

0

0

:□ D ; D

·\ ·l )

"-".,:, :4. t-..

--<'!",rt'\ r/ )i _.. .,~

:-.

~~===

1/

0

"'~.;· u...,.'"'.....,~;:!Sle:,,.,...,---r

fl.~GE

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

All future installation should conform to V irginia Information Technology Agency standards and industry best practices.

ELECTRICITY

Longwood's supplier, V irginia Dominion Power, does not foresee any issues in meeting the anticipated growth in campus electrical demand.

POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEMS

92

Overall, the municipal potable water and sanitary sewer systems serving the campus are currently adequate. However, these services should be carefully assessed in conjunction with each future project, especially regarding the cumulative increase in demand. Adequate water Bow for fire protection will be of particular

importance in the future. It is recommended that Longwood develop a campus water system model that will identify points of low flow and/or pressure. This model will provide better understanding of the system's future limitations.

Each future project will require stormwater control measures. Longwood should consider establishing a campus-wide stormwater plan that will evaluate the cumulative effects of future buildings and apply combined and area solutions.

- Existing Steam Pipe 1 1 1 1 Potential Future Steam Pipe Routing Existing Electrical Distribution (owned by V irginia Dominion Power) 1 1 1 Potential Future Electrical Distribution Existing Telecommunication Distribution 1 1 1 Potential Future Telecommunication Distribution

•• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• '' •'

===================== ================================, Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

I

WAYFINDING

A signage plan provides multiple levels of visitor information, site and destination identification, and vehicular and pedestrian directions .

The recommendations described below should form the basis for the development of a comprehensive set of design guidelines. The proposed sign types and descriptions are shown in Table #3 1 . 1 Recommended locations for vehicular wayfinding signs are shown in Figures 3 and 4 of the Campus Transportation Report (Appendix, Report 2).

RECOMMENDATIONS

• Provide motorists with guidance information along the major roadways leading into the Farmville area - Route 460, Route 1 5 , and Route 45 using trailblazer signs and highway guidance signs.

• Direct visitors into the campus along South Main Street and Griffin Boulevard from the south, East Third Street from the east, West Third Street from the west, and North Main Street from the north using directional signs and trailblazers. One possible design standard is shown in Table #3 1 . 1 Visitors approaching the campus along Griffin Boulevard and High Street would be provided with many cues to the institutional identity once these roadways undergo planned improvements - new sidewalks, bicycle lanes, Longwood University banner posts, pedestrian­ scale lighting, and underground utilities. These positive cues should be reinforced with additional visual devices, such as uniform streetscape fixtures and sidewalk furnishings. Since South Main Street will remain the principal access roadway leading to campus in the foreseeable future, it should undergo enhancements similar to those described above.

@ The Final Plan

Signage

• Direct visitors to an information center, or centers, on campus. Maps, information brochures, and electronic kiosks should be available at the center. The recommended location for the primary information center is the new Admissions Office building at the intersection of South Main Street and Wynne Drive. A secondary_ information center could be located in the future Public Safety and Community Services Building at the northwestern corner of East Redford Street and South Main Street.

Both of these locations offer visual contact with the main campus along the arrival route, visitor parking, easy access to the central campus, and convenient access to local transit. Un-staffed information kiosks should be placed on vehicular and pedestrian approaches to campus, at parking facilities, and within the campus. All kiosks should have information that visitors can take with them and should provide key campus telephone numbers.

• Once on foot within the campus, visitors and other users should encounter a network of pedestrian-scale signs and maps that provide orientation and destination information. This information should include directions to accessible building entrances and visitor parking areas.

• The campus map should always be kept current, and should also identify destinations within a 5 - 1 0 minute walk of the visitor's location.

~

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

93

e ~

-• -• -

Signage Wayfinding Sign Type Descriptions Text

crj

Terminology

Subcomponents

Symbols

Locations

Legibility Requirements

Longwood University logo

as reinforcement along major roadways and approaches to campus/town

per MUTCD

main campus entrances

visible from 200 feet

parking, information, local and state route symbols

1 00-1 50' prior to intersection

letters 6" min height for all capitals, 4.5" min for lower cases, font = San Serif

parking

at vehicle street entries to parking facilities

visible from 200', legible from 1 00'+

Example

~

~ ~

crj

Vehicular Trailbrazers

Longwood University

Gateways

Longwood University

~ -~ ~ (].)

~

Longwood University iogo

•

-•• ----• •• -•

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY Lolumbus Campus

~ Vehicular Directional

Parking Decks and Lots

facility name

Visitor Information Station

list of Longwood University facilities with names and locations

grid-based map of campus

'You Are Here' indicator

Pedestrian Directional

sign location (if at named intersection), parking facilities nearby, major landmarks, and destinations

names limited to two words, to fit grouped by in one line, direction of travel buildings listed alphabetically

information, accessibility, parking

Pedestrian Trailblazer

major venues, accessible entrances, and routes

one destination per trailblazer

bike parking, major venues

one destination per trailblazer with facility name and directional arrow

Bicycle Trailblazer

94

destination I facility names

visitor parking, visitor information, admissions, major venues

names limited to two words, fit in one line

I

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

entries/exits to parking and accessible to elderly and major facilities, pull-offs for handicapped people, motorists approaching campus, illuminated at night, major pedestrian spines, recognizable from 200' downtown Farmville

street corners, pedestrian intersections

intersections, along routes from

parking to destinations, in front famtTtar accesSI"blt 1 1 Y sym bOIs I of buildings to accessible entrances

familiar symbols

I

along bicycle paths and lanes and designated bicycle routes, at bicycle path entrances

� � 1 00' visibility

1 00' visibility

Table # 3 1 . 1 Wayfinding Sign Type Descriptions

••

•• •

Hull Springs Farm

•

R E N OVAT E D B OAT H O U S E R E N O VAT E T O S U P P O RT G A M I N G A N D L O U N G E S PAC E -----<:::;>"Yo"t

1:� P R I N G S F A R M 0� LO

G 'OC O O O t,

I\ FRSITY

E N C LO S E EXISTING G A RAG E F O R M E ET I N G -- r---. R-O O M S N

GE N

E D U C AT I N G • C O N S E R V I N G • S U S TA I N I N G

R E N OVAT E D M A I N C A M P C OTTAG E

N E W R E C R E AT I O N - B A S K E T BA L L -VO L L E Y B A L i,, -T E N N I S

t:

•,,,,,, ,,, " ",,

N E W C OTTAG E S ( 6 ) � -8 B E D RO O M S . 1 6 B E D S E A .

-COMM

,Ill

Ill

N E W R E S E A RC H L A B O RAT O RY �-.::,....,� B U I L D I N G

•....

07

,,:'--tl • ':)9•':)J':) ii ,;_;'J6 9?,· ft-

..• •• •• •• •• ••

Fig ure # 83 Hull F _g_s_F a.._ , s_ Pf!51 -----?oo· \.

,.

I KEY MAP

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

95

Sustainability - Water ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

Landscape Irrigation

>>>>> >

POSSIBLE STRATEGY

UNIVERSITY GOAL

>>> >>>

>

Reduce irrigation with potable wa­ ter

Stormwater Runoff

• Replace older water closets with 1 .28 gpm fixtures

>>>

>

96

• Replace shower heads with 2.0 gpm fixtures • Correct water leaks as soon as they appear

Reduce the amount of storm­ water runoff

>>>

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

• Create a student, faculty, and staff education program Reduce irrigation with potable water

- Install native or drought-resistant landscape material whenever possible

>>>

Sediment Collection

• Replace old piping and water distribution systems during building repair and renovation projects

• Use programmable, high-efficiency irrigation systems

Rain Garden

>> >> Water Pollution

Reduce potable water purchase

• Replace older lavatories with 0.5 gpm fixtures

>>>

Stormwater Runoff

Develop a university water management policy

• Install water meters at every building

Pervious Pavement

>> >> >

OTHER SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL INITIATIVES FOR WATER:

- Investigate possibilities for irrigation with stormwater runoff and/or recycled water

Protect the

quality of

• ••

••

stormwater leaving the • campus

Figure # 84 Final Plan, Sustainability, Water

• •• •

I

Sustainability - Material Flows POSSIBLE STRATEGY

UNIVERSITY GOAL

OTHER SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL INITIATIVES FOR MATERIAL FLOWS:

Reduce the amount of non-food waste going to landfills

• Educate students, facul ty, and staff about waste reduction, especially during move-in and move-out periods

Reduce the amount of non-food waste going to landfills

• Educate students, facul ty, and staff about electronic recycling

• Incorporate solid waste reduction strategies and requirements into university purchasing procedures and standards • Incorporate solid waste reduction strategies and requirements into universi ty construction procedures and standards

• Coordinate Longwood programs, projects, and initiatives with those of local, regional, and state governments and organizations

Reduce the amount of food waste go­ ing into the sanitary

Reduce the amount of food waste going into the sanitary sewer • Divert food waste from the dining hall and catering food preparation areas into the existing food pulper

..

• Expand the food waste reduction best practices into Longwood food service facilities located outside the dining hall

Reduce the amount of nutrients purchased for landscaping . Expand Longwood's composting program

. Expand Longwood's integrated nutrient program to include athletic fields, off-campus apartment communities, and the golf course

Reduce the amount of synthetic nutrients purchased for landscaping

Figure # 85 Final Plan, Sustainabili ty, Material Flows

....•

<< <<

<<< <<< <<<

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

Bulk Recycling System

Recycling System

<< << << << << <<

\

- <[

-----

f

.:_\ '.'.:

,~

I

@ ~

.,

p-

\

/

(D

~ ~~

Non-Food Waste Land Fill

~

~

~

~

~

~

Food Waste

<<< <<<

<< << Chemical Nutrient Application Composting Facility

<< <<

<<< Compost Utilization

Landscaping Chemicals Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

97

•• •

@) Sustainability - Energy ~

POSSIBLE STRATEGY

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

UNIVERSITY GOAL

crj ~

~

>> >>

~

crj

OTHER SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL INITIATIVES FOR ENERGY:

>>

.~

Reduce greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Virginia Energy Plan and Governor of Virginia Executive Order 59

~

~

Cl)

~

Oil Refinery

~

Solar Absorbtion Chiller

>> >> Wind Turbine

>> >>

Power Plant Emissions

>>

>>

Oil Refinery Pump

98

Gasoline Consumption

• Install a third biomass boiler in the new campus heating plant • Investigate purchasing land on which to grow biomass for use in the campus heating plant • Coordinate and incorporate the related strategies of reducing overall energy use, reducing vehicle fuel use and emissions, and developing a sustainable transportation program

Reduce annual costs of non­ renewable energy purchases (Executive Order 48)

• Coordinate Longwood programs, projects, and initiatives with those of local, regional, and state governments and organizations Reduce the purchase of non-renewable energy • Meter, control, and manage the energy use of every campus building individually • Require that all new construction meet or exceed the energy efficiency performance standards set by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

>> >>

>>

>> >>

>>

>> >> Alternative Fuels

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

• Require that all building renovation projects meet or exceed the energy efficiency performance standards set by ASHRAE • Purchase Energy Star appliances

Improve the fuel efficiency and reduce the carbon emissions from fleet vehicle use (Executive Order 48)

f

• Create a student, faculty, and staf education program Improve the fuel efficiency and reduce carbon emissions from university fleet vehicles • Implement a vehicle use reduction program • Purchase fuel-efficient, low-emission vehicles

Figure # 86 Final Plan, Sustainabili ty, Energy

• Investigate the purchase of alternate-fuel vehicles • Investigate the purchase of non-traditional types and sizes of vehicles

•• •• •• •• • •• • •• •• •• ••

•• • •• •• •• •

Sustainability - Transportation

•'==============================================================

,•

OTHER SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL INITIATIVES FOR TRANSPORTATION: Reduce number of cars brought to campus by commuter students, faculty, and staff • Create a student, facul ty, and staff education program

• Implement a policy and program of transportation demand management based on best practices used by educational institutions

Reduce number of cars brought to campus by commuter students, faculty, and staff

Increase pedestrian and bicycle trips between Longwood and the adjacent communi ty • Coordinate with, and participate in, area and regional pedestrian and bicycle route planning and implementation

• Provide showers and lockers for pedestrian and bicycle commuters

• Provide adequate, convenient, and secure bicycle parking facilities throughout campus

• Include pedestrian and bicycle-friendly hardscapes and signage throughout campus

•• •• • •• •

Reduce carbon emissions related to vehicle trips to and from Longwood

. Coordinate and incorporate the related strategies of reducing number of cars brought to campus, increasing pedestrian and bicycle trips, and reducing university-owned vehicle use . Increase the use of shuttle and/or town buses by student,

facul ty, and staff, both on and off campus

. Coordinate Longwood programs, projects, and initiatives

with those of local, regional, and state governments and organizations

<<<

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

RESERVED PARKING

~

~

(D

<< <<

~ ~

~

.

~

j,,,-,,l

<<<

<< <<

Carbon Emissions

~ j,,,-,,l ~

~

Carpooling

Increase pedestrian and bicycle trips between Longwood and the adjacent community

• Conduct a campus lighting analysis and implement uniform campus outdoor lighting standards

••

POSSIBLE STRATEGY

UNIVERSITY GOAL

@

<< <<

<<<

Carbon Emissions

Bicycle Lanes

<< <<

<<< Bicycle Lockups

Reduce carbon emissions related to vehicle trips to and from Longwood

<< <<

<<< Locker Rooms

<<<

Figure # 87 Final Plan, Sustainabili ty, Transportaion

<< << Showers

Gasoline Consumption Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

99

..•

•• •• •• •• •• •• •• • •••

..

•,,,,

,,

•• •

Implementation VI I I

•• •• •• •• •

LONGWOOD U N

I

V E

R S

I

T Y

COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

10 1

@ Architectural and Design Guidelines ~

.0

~

~

crj

~ Cl.)

8 Cl.)

~

~

8

~

GENERAL

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

It is Longwood University's intent to maximize the design potential of each campus building project in terms of accommodating the programs to be served, fostering collegiality on the campus, and contributing to the public realm that defines the Longwood University campus as a unique place.

Achievement of the programmatic goals for each project dictates that the design must cost-effectively overlay the specific, user-generated objectives for the project with Longwood University objectives of institutional identity, durability, longevity, flexibility, sustainability, and adaptability. Each project must, in the interest of fostering collegiality, create environments that encourage interaction and discourse among students, faculty, and staff.

This potential should be recognized in the development of both interior and exterior environments.

Longwood University is committed to the principles of energy conservation. All designs should maximize energy efficiency and comply with the Governor's Executive Order

One major requirement of programmatic accommodation is development of a project's "insides." However, each project also has a responsibility to the greater whole of the campus, both as an entity in itself, and part of the community in which it thrives. This responsibility to the public realm recognizes the importance of the architectural and planning traditions at Longwood University and strives to contribute to the further development of the campus as a highly imaginable, unique, and inspiring environment.

To achieve these goals, it is incumbent on the project design team to invest in an understanding not only of immediate program goals, but also of the planning and architecture history for the campus, as well as of the goals and objectives set forth in the current Campus Master Plan.

ACCESSIBLE DESIGN Longwood University's policy is to create learning and working environments that will engender participation by all persons who visit, attend, and are employed by the University. New and renovated space designs allowing inclusion of all persons are top priority. In fact, universal design that incorporates access for all persons should be a primary planning criterion: accessibility standards should be included in the initial planning of all new facilities, not an afterthought during a code review of a design that is otherwise considered complete. For new construction, there is no need to segregate access for persons with disabilities from that for the general population.

1 02 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

48.

SUSTAINABILITY In order to incorporate sustainable design solutions in new construction and renovation projects, Longwood University has joined the USGBC (US Green Building Council) ™ and follows the guidance of the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Building Rating System during the design process. Furthermore, the University has developed the Sustainability Strategic Plan (2008). The pursuit of high performance, energy efficient, and environmentally sensitive "green" buildings will help to lower operating and energy costs, improve employee productivity, promote improved learning, and enhance the health and well-being of the students, faculty, and staff at Longwood University. All projects will focus on sustainability as it relates to site issues, water, and energy efficiency.

•• •

•• •

DESIGN CHARACTER 1. The architecture at Longwood University generally expresses an ordered, tradi­ tional theme, drawing from a legacy of Palladian-Jeffersonian architecture in the historic northeast district of campus.

2. All new buildings should reflect the character of Longwood University as an institution with a rich past, vibrant present, and promising future.

3. Buildings should extend and enhance the underlying planning and architectural strengths of the campus.

4. New buildings should balance individual expression with contextual sensitivity.

5. Program, site, and budget parameters should all be addressed in an integrated fashion.

•• •• I

Proj ect Phasing PROJECT PHASING This campus master plan establishes the long term vision for the physical development of the Longwood University campus to support enrollment growth and new programs. To accomplish this development, Longwood has devised a capital construction plan that follows the Commonwealth of V irginia's capital planning process. Under this process, each state institution must develop and regularly update a plan that identifies the institution's construction projects, priorities, and schedule. Longwood will maintain its current capital plan as a supporting document to this master plan.

The recommendation for Longwood's capital planning and construction program is divided into phases that spread the major construction projects over the master plan's horizon. Each phase includes specific physical requirements and opportunities that were identified in the master plan, along with projects from the previous capital construction plan and anticipated renovations of several older campus buildings.

Near Term • Renovation of Stevens Hall for nursing program . Renovation of French Hall for University Technology Center

• Student housing construction • Parking • New student union • New physical plant building

• Renovation of South Ruffner Building for faculty offices • New admissions office and visitor information center

• Campus infrastructure (renovation of old heating plant; general infrastructure improvements) • New Alumni Center

Mid Term • Student housing construction and renovation • Library and Lankford Building expansion and renovation

• New performing arts center • Wygal Building renovation

• HRK program renovation and expansion • Campus infrastructure (green space and plazas; renovation of existing buildings)

Long Term • College of Education renovation and expansion • College of Business expansion

• New public safety and university services building • LCVA expansion and renovation

• Campus infrastructure (green space and plazas)

W hen Required • New convocation center • Tennis courts and recreation field • Natatorium

• Golf course renovation • New academic building • Campus infrastructure (south campus chiller plan; renovation of existing buildings) • Student housing renovation

•• •

1 03 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan

Revision 1 - March 2012

•• • •• •• •• •• •• •• ••

Property Acquisition

.0 � �

~ ,......a, Q

0)

8 0) .

On September 14, 2007 the Longwood University Board of directors adopted a resolution approvi ng th e acquisiti on of properties within the area bounded by Griffi n B oulevard, H igh Street, and South Main Street (locally known as "th e triangle") as they become available for sale. This master plan does not de pend on acquisition of additional property in this area to achieve th e recommendations for de­ velopment by 2020. H owever, acquisition of additional property within th e triangle will eventually be necessar y for fu t ure development, and L on gwood should acquire the pro perty in accordance with the Board's resolution (Figure #88).

-

Oth er properties needed to support the future needs of the institution include: LCVA 129 North Main Street Farmville, VA. 23909 The Hardy House 303 Beech Street Farmville, VA. 23909 New Alumni Center 608 High Street Farmville, VA. 23909 Property within the small triangle of High Street, Venebule Street an d Main Street

0

F igure # 88 Proposed ...J Property Acquisition Ll..l.::li..lL..-��.l....--....i�.;;;;;;;;;;;;;��•.tt..--...ll..-'-.:;;;..;;;;;;...1.u�-l....l..l.L.l.l....-

1 04 Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

• •• •• •• •• •• •

•• •

Monitoring and Updating the Master Plan The universe of factors that affect this campus master plan is shown in Figure #89. Each factor must be continuously monitored; a significant change in any will require an analysis of potential impact on the master plan.

A review of each of the factors in Figure #89 should be conducted every two years. A review of the entire Campus Master Plan is strongly recommended upon completion of 50% of the supporting capital plan and/or at the mid-point of the planning period (6th year) , whichever occurs first.

Figure # 89

Longwood University Comprehensive Campus Master Plan September 2008

105

@

- ~;.a~><! __________________________________________:

~~

0

<

LIST OF FIGURES II

The Campus Master Planning Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Figure # 1 Master Planning Process Diagram

III

Longwood University . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Figure # 2 Virginia State Map Figure # 3 Farmville Map Figure # 4 Vicinity Identification Figure # 5 Historic Districts and Flood Plains Figure # 6 1985 Master Plan Figure # 7 1991 Master Plan Figure # 8 200 1 Master Plan

IV

The Existing Campus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1

Figure # 9 Town of Farmville Figure # 10 Existing Land Use, Primary Campus Property Figure # 1 1 Existing Floor Area Ratios Figure # 12 Floor Area Ratio Defined Figure # 13 Existing Building Adjacency Figure # 14 Geocoded Addresses of Campus Population Figure # 15 Existing Pedestrian Circulation Figure # 16 Pedestrian Conflicts West Figure # 17 Pedestrian Conflicts East Figure # 18 Existing Green Space and Density Figure # 19 Existing Campus Vehicular Circulation Figure # 20 Existing Campus Parking Figure # 2 1 Existing Pedestrian / Vehicular Conflict Figure # 22 Existing Housing Figure # 23 Existing Recreation and Sport Facilities Figure # 24 Existing Entrances, Gateways, and Boundaries Figure # 25 Existing Infrastructure, Water, and Sewer Figure # 26 Existing Infrastructure, Steam, Electrical, and Telecom

106

•• : •

V

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences . . . . . . . . . . 4 1

Figure # 27 Existing Space By Category Figure # 28 Enrollment Projections Figure # 29 Sustainability Goals

VI

Development of the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Figure # 30 Areas of Opportunity Figure # 3 1 Development, Entrances, Gateways, and Boundaries Figure # 32 Development, Land, and Buildings, Library Figure # 33 Development, Land, and Buildings, One-Stop Figure # 34 Preliminary Sketch, Lankford Figure # 35 Development, Land, and Buildings, Lankford Figure # 36 Preliminary Sketch, Student Union Figure # 37 Development, Land, and Buildings, Dorrill Figure # 38 Preliminary Sketch, Dorrill Figure # 39 Development, Land and Buildings, Public Safety and University Services Figure # 40 Preliminary Sketch, Public Safety and University Services Figure # 4 1 Lancer Park Proposed Access Figure # 42 Option A, High Street Figure # 43 Option A, Race Street Figure # 44 Option B, Race Street Figure # 45 Option A, Madison Street Congestion Figure # 46 Option B, Madison Street Congestion Figure # 47 Option A, Madison Street Truck Traffic Figure # 48 Option B, Madison Street Truck Traffic Figure # 49 Venable Street and South Main Street Figure # 50 Spruce Street and Radford Street Figure # 5 1 Traffic Calming Option A Figure # 52 Traffic Calming Option B Figure # 53 Potential Parking Sites Figure # 54 Proposed Pedestrian Paths and Zones Figure # 55 Proposed Pedestrian Improvements Figure # 56 Pedestrian Crossing Figure # 57 Preliminary Sketch, Residential C Figure # 58 Preliminary Sketch, Residential D Figure # 59 Potential Housing Development Sites

Figure # 60 Development, Land, and Buildings, Convocation Center Figure # 6 1 Preliminary Sketch, Convocation Center A VII

The Final Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

Figure # 62 Final Plan, Landscaping, Entrances, and Boundaries Figure # 63 Final Plan, Land Use Analysis Figure # 64 Final Plan, Floor Area Ratios Figure # 65 Final Plan, Building Adjacency Figure # 66 Final Plan, Building Project Summary Figure # 67 Final Plan, Vehicular Circulation Figure # 68 Existing Emergency Service Access Figure # 69 Proposed Emergency Service Access Figure # 70 Final Plan, Lancer Park Figure # 7 1 Final Plan, Walking Circles Figure # 72 Current and Proposed Farmville Area Bicycle Network Figure # 73 Proposed Farmville Area Bicycle Routes by Type Figure # 74 Proposed Bicycle Plan On-campus Figure # 75 Final Plan, Open Space, and Pedestrian Circulation Figure # 76 Final Plan, Housing Figure # 77 Final Plan, Possible Additions to Longwood Village Figure # 78 Model Rendering, Housing Figure # 79 Model Rendering, Convocation Center Figure # 80 Final Plan, Recreation, and Athletics Figure # 8 1 Final Plan, Longwood Golf Course Figure # 82 Final Plan, Infrastructure Figure # 83 Hull Springs Farm Recomendation Figure # 84 Final Plan, Sustainability, Water Figure # 85 Final Plan, Sustainability, Material Flows Figure # 86 Final Plan, Sustainability, Energy Figure # 87 Final Plan, Sustainability, Transportation

VIII

Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1

Figure # 88 Proposed Property Acquisition Figure # 89 Monitoring and Updating

• • • •• •• • •• •• •• •• •• f

• N

The Existing Campus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1

Table # 20. 1 Existing and Future Parking Demand Table # 20.2 Future Parking Shortfall Table # 25. 1 Future Building Storm Sewer Summary Table # 26. 1 Future Building Steam Summary Table # 26.2 Future Building Electric Summary

V

Future Campus Requirements and Preferences . . . . . . . . . . 4 1

Table # 27. 1 Existing Space By Space Category Table # 27.2 Space Requirements By College / Unit Table # 27.3 Space Requirements By Category Table # 27.4 Issue Identifying Matrix Table # 28. 1 Student Enrollment Projections Table # 28.2 Faculty / Staff Projections

VI

LIST OF REPORTS Other planning documents were used in the compilation of this Master Plan. Complete versions of these documents can be accessed through the universi ty website or Longwood University Facilities Management office.

1. Carter Burgess. Campus Wide Facilities Condition Assessment.

Arlington, VA : 2007.

Appendix

•

LIST OF TABLES

2. Martin Alexiuo Bryson. Longwood Universi ty Master Plan, Farmville, VA, Campus Transportation Elements. Raleigh, NC : 2008.

3. Moseley Architects. Longwood Universi ty Campus Sustainability Assessment and Long-term Goal Setting. Richmond, VA : 2008.

4. Paulien & Associates Incorporated. Space Needs Analysis and Planning for the Master Plan at Longwood Universi ty. Denver, CO : 2008.

Development of the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Table # 53. 1 Parking Reconciliation Table # 59. 1 Future Student Housing Requirements

VII

The Final Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

Table # 31. 1 Wayfinding Sign Type Descriptions

107

• 4 4 PERSONNEL

President's Cabinet Dr. Patricia Cormier President

Ms. Brenda Atkins Executive Assistant to the President for Governmental Affairs and Special Projects

Mr. Richard Bratcher Vice President for Facilities and Real Property

Ms. Diane Easter Special Assistant to the President and Director of Events and Ceremonies Dr. Wayne McWee Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs

Dr. Frank Moore Vice President for Information and Instructional Technology Dr. Kenneth Perkins Executive Assistant to the President for Student Success

Dr. Tim Pierson Vice President for Student Affairs

Mr. Craig Rogers Vice President for University Advancement

Ms. Kathy Worster Vice President for Administration and Finance

Steering Committee

Mr. Richard Bratcher Vice President for Facilities and Real Property

Mr. Ken Copeland Executive Director of the Longwood University Real Estate Foundation

108

Dr. Frank Moore Vice President for Information and Instructional Technology

Dr. Tim Pierson Vice President for Student Affairs

Mr. Craig Rogers Vice President for University Advancement

Edward Pawlowski Senior Associate

Nicole Warmsley Associate AIA

Planning Consultants

Dr. Wayne McWee Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs

Paulien & Associates Incorporated Kate Herbolsheimer Associate

Ms. Kathy Worster Vice President for Administration and Finance

Engineering Consultants

Mr. J.W Wood Director of Capital Planning and Construction, and University Architect

University Master Plan Team

Mr. Richard Bratcher Vice President for Facilities and Real Property Mr. R.W Jerome Campus Master Plan Coordinator

Ms. Kelly A. Martin Assistant Campus Master Plan Coordinator Ms. Louise Waller Space Planning and Real Property Manager PLANNING AND DESIGN TEAMS

Master Planning

Moseley Architects David Harnage Director of Higher Education, Vice President

Patton Harris Rust & Associates Engineering John Reno PE Senior Project Engineer RMF Engineering Incorporated Stephen E. Mc Adams PE Associate Oleg Shifrin Design Engineer

Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Consultant Martin Alexiou Bryson George Alexiou, PE Principal

Adam Wroblewski Associate

•

• •• = =• •• •• •• ••

=-