Granby Drummer November 2017

Page 1

Drummer FO R I M ME DIAT E DE LI V E RY

*****************ECRWSS****

PAID

Local Postal Customer

The Granby

PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE AVON, CT PERMIT NO. 466

Your hometown VOLUNTEER newspaper

Follow us on:

Published by Citizens for a Better Granby a non-profit 501(c)3 organization

Volume XLVIII, No. 3 • November 2017

www.granbydrummer.com

FREE

Board of Ed eyes potential cuts if state budget isn’t passed By Debora Timms The Granby Board of Education met on the first and third Wednesdays of October at the Town Hall Meeting Room. At both sessions, the pressing issue was the budget crisis in the state capital. The first deposit of the Education Cost Sharing (ECS) grant was not made to towns, so the district is currently holding off on all non-essential programming. During the Oct. 18 meeting, it was noted that the district administration has started looking at cuts that might be needed depending upon the resolution that the state comes to. The situation threatens to be a setback to Connecticut’s educational system. “It’s not going to be pretty,” Dr. Addley warned. “The options aren’t great.”

The state is supposedly moving closer to passing a budget, but recently announced agreement on the framework for a bipartisan deal, key details including the distribution of town aid remain unresolved. Addley pointed out that this means that, though planning continues for lesser outcomes, there is still hope a deal will be struck allowing Granby’s state funding to hold or even improve. Some of the initiatives underway in Granby schools were discussed during both sessions. During the first meeting, Assistant Superintendent Christopher Tranberg made a presentation on the district’s gifted and talented student programming. He addressed identifying gifted and talented students; 24 students have cur-

Board of Ed. cont’d. on p. 2

Municipal Election on Nov. 7 There are 11 different races to be decided by the Nov. 7, 2017, municipal election including first selectman, board of selectmen, board of finance, board of education, board of assessment appeals, planning and zoning, zoning board of appeals and town moderator. Voters will have the opportunity to vote for 24 open seats. It takes an extralong, one-sided ballot to include all of these offices. In the past, the board of selectmen race has caused some confusion. All five seats are open every two years but voters can only choose one candidate for first selectman and two candidates from those running for the board. The Board of Education has been getting additional attention this year because six candidates are running for three open seats.

Candidates for the Nov. 7, 2017 Municipal Ballot First Selectman 1 Opening 2-yr. term (Vote for 1) B. Scott Kuhnly – R Board of Selectman Four Openings 2-yr. term (Vote for 2) James C Lofink and Sally S King – D Edward E. Ohannessian and Mark Neumann – R Board Of Finance Three Openings 4-yr. term (Vote for 3) Frederick A. Moffa – D Alfred G. Wilke and Gordon C. Bischoff – R Board Of Education Three Openings 4-yr. term (Vote for 3) Brandon C. Webster and Valorie A. Hollister and Kimberly L. Becker – D Melissa E. Migliaccio and Stephen Royer and Sarah Thrall – R Board Of Assessment Appeals 2 Openings 4-yr. term (Vote for 2) Daniel Chapple – D Celia Eggert – R

Planning and Zoning Commission 3 Openings 4-yr. term (Vote for 3) Eric Lukingbeal and Margaret Q. Chapple – D Eric W. Myers – R Planning and Zoning Commission Alternate 1 Opening 4-yr. term (Vote for 1) Christine L. Chinni – D Zoning Board Of Appeals 2 Openings 4-yr. term (Vote for 2) Wayne E. Chapple – D Robert M. Lindeyer – R Zoning Board of Appeals Alternates 2 Openings 4-yr. term (Vote for 2) Suzanne L. Yucha – D William O’Leary – R Zoning Board of Appeals Alternates 2 Openings 2-yr. term (Vote for 1) David Hennessey – D Town Moderator 1 Opening 2-yr. term (Vote for 1) John E. Adams – R

See Election guide, page 29

Inside Historic Footnotes............ 11

Humans of Granby............. 17

Daylight Savings Time....... 12

Election Guide.................. 29

Striking a bargain at the SBHS Flea This youngster finally got the toy she wanted after 10 minutes shopping at this table, as her father looked on and paid for it. Photo by Peter Dinella

Governor vetoes budget; legislators try again By Michael B. Guarco, Jr. Chair, Board of Finance Early in October the Governor vetoed the budget proposal passed by the legislature in September. His reasons centered on a lesser amount allocated for pensions than he sought, as well as lesser amounts to UCONN and the state college system. He also condemned what he views as other budget gimmickry that seems to be contained in all proposals to date, regardless of source. In the meantime the impasse casts a long shadow, causing great angst amongst municipal leaders statewide, with places big and small—Hartford and Scotland, talking about going under if resolution doesn’t materialize shortly. In mid-October the leaders of all four legislative caucuses continued budget negotiations to find and create common ground to resolve this fiscal fiasco. This was without the Governor in the room, as he seems to be more part of the problem than the solution. In recent days the lead legislators came forward saying they believe they have agreed upon a revised framework for this bi-

ennial budget albeit months late. While information is scant at this writing, it appears that under this proposal, Granby will get basically what we budgeted for from the state in this fiscal year. Each of the legislative proposals did the same over the past few months, though the Democrat proposal would have given Connecticut more in the way of tax and fee increases and less structural change going forward than the Republican proposal did. That’s one reason that some brave Democrat legislators chose to not support their leadership’s proposal and instead joined in supporting the Republican budget proposal last month. As the Democrat state rep from Branford said on the floor of the House, she was tired of being punished by her leadership for going against the party line, and wouldn’t vote for the Democrat proposal that had more rats (pork) in it than the London subway system. As we await the actual numbers lineby-line, town-by-town, we also watch for what else is in the budget proposal, both for the FY19 revenues to towns, but also in terms of mandate relief or

Board of Finance cont’d. on p. 3

Photos by Peter Dinella


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.