The Semblance of Legality Luke 22:66 The Jewish leaders had just had a nighttime trial for Jesus, a trial that wouldn’t have convinced any impartial observer that Jesus was actually guilty. But their nighttime trial had casually ignored that inconvenient truth and ended with them declaring Jesus to be worthy of death. Then they beat him with their fists, spit on him, and in general acted like a bunch of animals. When that nighttime trial was over, they took a moment to recompose themselves, put on somber frowny faces, and…have another trial for Jesus at daybreak? Hadn’t they just done that? Well, yes. But also, no. You see, the Sanhedrin – the Jewish ruling council – wasn’t allowed to meet at night, perhaps to avoid the very thing that just happened the night before. And this prior trial had been carried out under the cover of darkness in more ways than one. They had kept certain members of the Sanhedrin in the dark about the meeting in order to ensure they got the outcome they desired regardless of the truth. People aren’t as likely to try that sort of shady behavior in the daylight. Since the Sanhedrin wasn’t allowed to meet at night, they had not officially declared Jesus guilty of death in that off-the-books trial. So as day broke, they convened an official meeting, a legal meeting of the Sanhedrin. As an author once wrote, “They were extremely anxious to maintain a semblance of legality.” (William Lauterbach from Northwestern Publishing House’s The Crucial Hours) Part of the reason the Jewish leaders wanted to hold this official trial was to cover all their bases, to prepare for every eventuality. They didn’t want their verdict to get challenged by Sanhedrin members like Nicodemus or Joseph of Arimathea who were also Christians. It seemed certain that neither of these men were made aware of the nighttime meeting and its verdict. What if one of them later showed up at Pilate’s residence and claimed that the nighttime trial had been invalid? The Sanhedrin didn’t want the guilty verdict to get thrown out on a technicality. The Sanhedrin might have been even more concerned that Pilate would throw out the verdict on a technicality than because it was plain false. As Pilate would later demonstrate, he wasn’t too concerned about upholding the truth. He sentenced Jesus to death even though he had found Jesus guilty of nothing. Pilate’s symbolic washing of his hands showed that he too was more interested in a semblance of legality (and perhaps plausible deniability) than in doing what was right.
1