FSU College of Law 2018-2021 Faculty Scholarship

2018-2021

FACULTY SCHOLARSHIP FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW

SCHOLARSHIP REPORT 2018-2021 Frederick M. Abbott...............................................1

Wayne A. Logan....................................................16

Robert E. Atkinson, Jr.......................................... 3

David L. Markell.................................................. 18

Shawn J. Bayern................................................... 4

Michael T. Morley............................................... 18

Courtney Cahill..................................................... 5

Erin O’Hara O’Connor.........................................20

Charles W. Ehrhardt............................................. 6

Erin Ryan..............................................................21

Avlana K. Eisenberg.............................................. 6

Lauren Scholz.....................................................23

Elissa Philip Gentry.............................................. 7

Mark B. Seidenfeld.............................................24

Shi-Ling Hsu.......................................................... 7

Justin T. Sevier...................................................25

Steve R. Johnson..................................................9

Mark Spottswood...............................................26

Jeffrey H. Kahn.....................................................9

Nat S. Stern.........................................................27

Jay Kesten........................................................... 10

Sarah L. Swan.....................................................28

Lawrence S. Krieger........................................... 10

Manuel A. Utset, Jr.............................................29

David E. Landau................................................... 11

Donald J. Weidner..............................................29

Tahirih V. Lee........................................................14

Kelli Alces Williams............................................30

Jake Linford.........................................................15

Mary Ziegler.........................................................31

The scholarly output of our faculty is impressive both in range of subject matter and quality of craftsmanship. Our faculty is rated the nation’s 29th best in terms of scholarly impact in the 2018 Leiter-Sisk ranking.

08/2021

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 1

FREDERICK M. ABBOTT Edward Ball Eminent Scholar Professor of International Law LL.M., U NIV E RS ITY O F CALIFO RNIA , BER KEL EY, 1989 J .D ., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 1977 B.A., U NIV E RS ITY O F CALIFO RNIA , BER KEL EY, 1 97 4

Supplement to the UNDP Guidebook for Low- and MiddleIncome Countries: Using Competition Law to Promote Access to Health Technologies (UNDP Publications) (forthcoming 2021) International Intellectual Property in an Integrated World Economy (with updated teacher’s manual) (with Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry) (4th ed., Kluwer/Aspen Publishers 2019) Technology Governance in a Devolved Global Legal Order: lessons from the China-USA strategic conflict, in A New Global Economic Order (Cheng Chia-Jui et al., editors) (Brill/Nijhoff Publishers) (forthcoming 2021) Managed Trade and Technology Protectionism: A Formula for Perpetuating Inequality?, in Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Global Inequality (Daniel Benoliel, Francis Gurry, Keun Lee and Peter Yu, editors) (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Legislative and Regulatory Takings of Intellectual Property: early stage intervention against a new jurisprudential virus, in Honor of Pedro Roffe, Liber Amicorum Pedro Roffe, Intellectual Property, Technology Transfer and Investment: Understanding the Interfaces and Development Impact (C. Correa & X. Seuba, editors) (Springer 2019) Public-Private Partnerships as Model for New Drug R&D: the future as now, in The Cambridge Handbook of Public-Private Partnerships, Intellectual Property Governance, and Sustainable Development (M. Chon, A. Abdel-Latif & P. Roffe, editors) (Cambridge University Press 2018) Health and Intellectual Property, in Research Handbook on Global Health Law (G-L Burci & B. Toebes, editors) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2018) The Generics Pathway in the USA: The American Experience, a Model for the World?, in Industria Farmacéutica, Derecho a la Salud y Propiedad Intelectual: El Reto del Equilibrio (M. (continued next page)

2 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

Frederick M. Abbott continued

Becerra & R. Martinez, editors) (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 2018) Child-Proofing Global Public Health in Anticipation of Emergency, 20 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021), at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3789677 Opportunities, Constraints and Critical Supports for Achieving Sustainable Local Pharmaceutical Manufacturing in Africa: With a Focus on the Role of Finance (with R. Abbott, J. Fortunak, P. Gehl Sampath & D. Walwyn,), Final Report, March 18, 2021 (Nova Worldwide), at https://nova-worldwide.com/OSF-PHP_report Facilitating Access to Cross-Border Supplies of Patented Pharmaceuticals: The Case of the COVID-19 Pandemic (with Jerome H. Reichman), 23 J. Int’l Econ. L. 535 (2020) (Oxford), at doi.org/10.1093/jiel/ jgaa022 Under the Radar: Reflections on ‘Forced’ Technology Transfer and the Erosion of Developmental Sovereignty, 69 GRUR Int’l 260 (2020) (Oxford), at doi: 10.1093/grurint/ikz023 The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal’s Misguided Reprieve for Pfizer’s Excessive Pricing Abuse, 49 Int’l Rev. Intell. Prop. & Competition L. 845 (2018), at doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-0734-y Let International Competition Negotiations Sleep a While Longer: Focus on Tools and Capacity, 49 Int’l Rev. Intell. Prop. & Competition L. 259 (2018), at doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-0683-5

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 3

ROBERT E. ATKINSON, JR. Greenspoon Marder Professor J .D ., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 198 2 B.A., WAS H ING TO N AND LE E U NI VER SITY, 1 97 9

The Proper Relationship of Private Philanthropy and the Liberal Democratic State: The Inquiry and the Inquirers as the Answer, in The Routledge Handbook on Taxation and Philanthropy (Henry Peter & Giedre Lideikyte Huber, editors) (Routledge) (forthcoming 2021) Back to Basics, and Beyond Belief: The Radical Re-Valuation Project of the New Standard Conception, in Leading Works in Legal Ethics ( Julian Webb, editor) (Routledge) (forthcoming 2021) A Primer on the Neo-Classical Republic Theory of the Nonprofit Sector (And the Other Three Sectors, Too), in Research Handbook on Not-for-Profit Law (Matthew Harding, editor) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2018) Sea Captains and Philosopher Kings: Billy Budd as Melville’s Republican Response to Plato’s Republic, 47 Hofstra L. Rev. 1139 (2020) For-Profit Managers as Public Fiduciaries: A Neo-Classical Republican Perspective, 19 Fla. St. Univ. Bus. Rev. 1 (2020), abbreviated version in Fiduciaries and Trust: Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law (Matthew Harding & Paul Miller, editors) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Writer Re-Written: What Really (Might Have) Happened to Atticus and Scout, 69 Ala. L. Rev. 595 (2018)

4 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

SHAWN J. BAYERN Larry and Joyce Beltz Professor of Torts and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F CALIFO RNI A , BER KEL EY, 2006 B.S ., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 1999

Autonomous Organizations (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Gilbert Law Summaries on Contracts (with Melvin A. Eisenberg) (15th ed., West Academic 2020) Closely Held Organizations (2d ed., Carolina Academic Press 2020) Reverse Engineering (by) Artificial Intelligence, in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence (Edward Elgar) (forthcoming 2022) Introduction to Contract Law, in Laws of Medicine: Core Legal Aspects for the Healthcare Professional (Springer) (forthcoming 2022) Intelligent Remedies, in The Cambridge Handbook on Artificial Intelligence and The Law (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2022) Agreements, Algorithms, and Agency, in The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms (Woody Barfield, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Artificial Intelligence and Private Law, in Research Handbook on Law and Artificial Intelligence (Woodrow Barfield & Ugo Pagallo, editors) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2018) Business Law Beyond Business, 46 J. Corp L. _ (forthcoming 2021) Are Autonomous Entities Possible?, 114 NW. U. L. Rev. Online 23 (2019) Methodological Failures in Leading American Economic Analyses of the Private Law, 5 Critical Analysis L. 19 (2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 5

COURTNEY CAHILL Donald Hinkle Professor J .D ., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 20 0 1 P H .D ., CO MP ARATIV E LITE RATU R E, PR IN CETON UN IVER SITY, 1999 B.A., CO LU MBIA U NIV E RS ITY , 19 93

Estates in Land and Future Interests: A Step-by-Step Guide (with Linda H. Edwards) (6th ed., Wolters Kluwer) (forthcoming 2022) Reproductive Exceptionalism in and Beyond Birthrights, 100 B.U. L. Rev. Online 152 (2020) The New Maternity, 133 Harv. L. Rev. 2221 (2020) After Sex, 97 Neb. L. Rev. 1 (2018)

Professor Courtney Cahill’s article, The New Maternity, 133 Harvard Law Review 2221 (2020), argues that constitutional maternity warrants reform and argues that one promising pathway of reform is family law’s less regressive and more multidimensional vision of motherhood. Cahill argues that progressive advances surrounding the new maternity ought to unsettle regressive tendencies surrounding constitutional maternity and imagines what the new maternity emerging from family law would mean for constitutional sex equality law.

6 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

CHARLES W. EHRHARDT Professor Emeritus J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F IO WA, 1964 B.S ., IO WA S TATE U NIV E RS ITY , 1962

Florida Evidence (2021 ed., West Publishing) Florida Trial Objections (6th ed., West Publishing 2019)

AVLANA K. EISENBERG Gary & Sallyn Pajcic Professor J .D ., S TANFO RD U NIV E RS ITY , 2004 B.A., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 1997

Discontinuities in Criminal Law, 21 Theoretical Inquiries in L. 137 (2021) The Prisoner and the Polity, 95 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1 (2020) Criminalizing Hate: Legal Frameworks and Enforcement Challenges in the United States, 132: 3 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 644 (2020)

Professor Avlana Eisenberg’s article, The Prisoner and the Polity, 95 New York University Law Review 1 (2020), uses the case study of higher education programs in prison to consider what duties the state incurs when it chooses to incarcerate someone as part of a termlimited punishment.

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 7

ELISSA PHILIP GENTRY Assistant Professor P H .D ., LAW & E CO NO MICS , V ANDER BIL T UN IVER SITY, 2016 J .D ., V AND E RBILT U NIV E RS ITY , 2016 B.S ., V AND E RBILT U NIV E RS ITY , 201 0

A Socially Beneficial False Claims Act?, 88 Tenn. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Contaminated Relationships in the Opioid Crisis (with Benjamin McMichael), 72 Hastings L.J. 827 (2021) Responses to Liability Immunization: Evidence from Medical Devices (with Benjamin McMichael), 17 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 789 (2020) Empirical Evidence of Risk Penalties for NTI Drugs, 52 J. Risk & Uncertainty 219 (2019) Asymmetric Effects of Changes in Workers’ Compensation Laws (with W. Kip Viscusi), 21 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 307 (2019)

SHI-LING HSU D’Alemberte Professor P H .D ., AGRICU LTU RAL AND RE S OUR CE ECON OMICS, U NIV E RS ITY O F CALIFO RNIA, DA VIS, 1998 M.S ., E CO LO G Y , U NIV E RS ITY O F CA L IFOR N IA , DA VIS, 1994 J .D ., CO LU MBIA U NIV E RS ITY , 1987 B.S ., CO LU MBIA U NIV E RS ITY , 19 83

Capitalism and the Environment: A Proposal to Save the Planet (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Ocean and Coastal Resources Law (with Josh Eagle) (Wolters Kluwer 2019) Prices Versus Quantities, in Policy Instruments in Environmental Law (K.R. Richards & J. van Zeben, editors) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020) (continued next page)

8 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

Shi-Ling Hsu continued

Carbon Pricing, in Legal Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in the United States ( J. Dernbach & M. Gerrard, editors) (Oxford University Press 2018) Human Capital in a Climate-Changed World, in Climate Change and Its Impact: Risks and Inequalities (C. Murphy, P. Gardoni & R. McKim, editors) (Springer 2018) Whither, Rationality? 120 Mich. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Carbon Taxes and Economic Inequality, _ Harv. L. & Pol’y Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Anti-Science Ideology, 74 U. Miami L. Rev. 405 (2021) Climate Triage: A Resources Trust to Address Inequality in a Climatechanged World, 50 Envtl. L. 97 (2020) Natural Gas Infrastructure: Locking in Emissions? (with Sam Kalen), 34 Nat. Res. & Envt. 3 (2020) A Green-ish New Deal? 50 Trends 1 (2019) Cooperation and Turnover in Law Faculties: A Game-theoretic Model and Empirical Study, 102 Marq. L. Rev. 1 (2018) Antitrust and Inequality: The Problem of Super-firms, 63 Antitrust Bulletin 104 (2018)

In Whither, Rationality? 120 Michigan Law Review _ (forthcoming 2021), Professor Shi-Ling Hsu evaluates how the authors of Retaking Rationality: How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health confront the recent challenge of leaders casting public doubt on the legitimacy of federal agencies.

Hsu argues that the case for rationality can be extended further afield, beyond cost-benefit analysis, and marshaled in a broader defense of welfarism and a still-broader defense of consequentialism.

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 9

STEVE R. JOHNSON Dunbar Family Professor J .D ., NE W Y O RK U NIV E RS ITY , 19 81 B.A., S T. FRANCIS CO LLE G E (NE W YOR K), 1 97 6

Teaching Tax Through the Simulation Method, 19 Pitt. Tax Rev. _ (forthcoming 2022) Federal Professional Responsibility Rules and State Malpractice Litigation, 75 Tax Lawyer _ (forthcoming 2021) Gitlitz and the Role of the Courts in Tax Administration, 40 Tax Times (2020) Seminole Rock in Tax Cases, 36 Yale J. Reg.: Notice & Comment (2018)

JEFFREY H. KAHN Harry M. Walborsky Professor and Associate Dean for Business Law Programs J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F MICH IGAN, 1997 B.A., D U KE U NIV E RS ITY , 1994

Taxation of S Corporations in a Nutshell (with Douglas Kahn) (3d ed., Thomson/West 2020) Principles of Corporate Tax (with Douglas Kahn) (2d ed., West 2019) Federal Income Tax (with Douglas Kahn) (8th ed., Foundation 2019) Too Much Salt? The Nuanced Impact of the State and Local Tax Deduction Cap on Pass-Through Business Taxpayers (with Miles Romney & John Treu), 25 Fla. Tax Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Tax and Cross-Collateralized Nonrecourse Liability (with Douglas Kahn), 24 Fla. Tax Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) (continued on next page)

10 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

Jeffrey H. Kahn continued

Recovery for Causing Tax Overpayment – Lyeth v. Hoey and Clark Revisited (with Douglas Kahn), 74 Tax Law. 437 (2021) Liability Insurance: A Reply to Professor Utz, 171 Tax Notes 423 (2021) Res Ipsa Loquitur: Reducing Confusion or Creating Bias? (with John Lopatka), 108 Kentucky L.J. 239 (2020) The Tax Treatment of Liability Insurance Coverage, 163 Tax Notes 1381 (2019) GoTaxMe: Crowdfunding and Gifts, 22 Fla. Tax Rev. 180 (2018) The Misfortune of the Deduction for Business and Personal Casualty Losses, 21 Fla. Tax Rev. 622 (2018)

JAY KESTEN Associate Professor LL.M., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 2009 LL.B., U NIV E RS ITY O F BRITIS H C OL UMBIA , 2002 B.A., U NIV E RS ITY O F BRITIS H COL UMBIA , 1 999

The Law and Economics of the Going-Public Decision, in The Oxford Handbook of IPOs (Douglas Cumming & Sofia Johan, editors) (Oxford University Press 2018) Of Convergence and Contingency: Some Thoughts on Public Firm Fiduciary Duties, _ Fla. L. Rev. Forum _ (forthcoming 2021)

LAWRENCE S. KRIEGER Clinical Professor and Co-Director of Clinical Externship Programs J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F FLO RID A, 197 8 A.B., P RINCE TO N U NIV E RS ITY , 19 67

Being the Happiest, Most Effective Lawyer You Can Be, in Becoming the Best Lawyer You Can Be (Levine, Stewart, editors) (American Bar Association 2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 11

DAVID E. LANDAU Mason Ladd Professor and Associate Dean for International Programs P H .D ., P O LITICAL S CIE NCE , H ARVA R D UN IVER SITY, 2015 J .D ., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 20 04 A.B., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 20 01

Abusive Constitutional Borrowing (with Rosalind Dixon) (Oxford University Press 2021) Comparative Constitution-Making (co-editor with Hanna Lerner) (Edward Elgar Press 2019) The Evolution of the Separation of Powers (co-editor with David Bilchitz) (Edward Elgar Press 2018) Constitutional Backsliding and its Responses in Colombia, in Constitutionalism in Context (David Law, editor) (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2022) Defensive Social Rights (with Rosalind Dixon), in Oxford Handbook of Economic and Social Rights (Malcolm Langford & Katharine G. Young, editors) (Oxford University Press) (forthcoming 2021)

(continued next page)

Professor David Landau’s co-authored article, The Uses and Abuses of Presidential Impeachment, 88 University of Chicago Law Review 81 (2021, with Tom Ginsburg & Aziz Huq), examines the law and practice of presidential impeachment globally. It draws first on case studies from countries such as South Korea, Paraguay, Brazil and South Africa, and then on empirical analysis of constitutional texts. This comparative analysis has significant implications for the design and practice of impeachment, especially in the United States. In particular, it supports a broader, more political gloss on the famously cryptic phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

12 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

David E. Landau continued

The Myth of the Illiberal Democratic Constitution, in Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Stephen Holmes, Andras Sajo & Renata Uitz, editors) (Routledge) (forthcoming 2021) Designing and Protecting Term Limits (with Rosalind Dixon), in Elgar Handbook of Comparative Election Law ( James A. Gardner, editor) (forthcoming 2021) Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America: Closing the Gap Between the Ideal and the Real, in Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law: Human Rights and Distributive Justice (Oxford University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Justice Cepeda’s Institution-Building on the Colombian Constitutional Court: A Fusion of the Political and the Legal, in Towering Judges (Rehan Abeyratne & Iddo Porat, editors) (Cambridge University Press 2021) Courts and Constitution Making: A Contextual Approach, in Redrafting Constitutions in Democratic Regimes: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives (Gabriel Negretto, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Term Limits and the Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment Doctrine: Lessons from Latin America (with Rosalind Dixon & Yaniv Roznai), in The Politics of Presidential Term Limits (Alex Baturo & Robert Elgie, editors) (Oxford University Press 2019) Constitutional Non-Transformation? Socioeconomic Rights Beyond the Poor (with Rosalind Dixon), in The Future of Social and Economic Rights (Katharine G. Young, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2019) Constitution-Making and Authoritarianism in Venezuela: The First Time as Tragedy, the Second as Farce, in Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Mark Tushnet, Sandy Levinson & Mark Graber, editors) (Oxford University Press 2018) Courts and Support Structures: Beyond the Classic Narrative, in Comparative Judicial Review (Erin F. Delaney & Rosalind Dixon, editors) (Edward Elgar Press 2018) Socioeconomic Rights and Majoritarian Courts in Latin America, in Constitutionalism in the Americas (Colin Crawford & Daniel Bonilla Maldonado, editors) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 13

South African Social Rights Jurisprudence and the Global Canon: A Revisionist View, in Constitutional Triumphs, Constitutional Disappointments: A Critical Assessment of the 1996 South African Constitution’s Local and International Influence (Theunis Roux & Rosalind Dixon, editors) (Cambridge University Press 2018) Legal Pragmatism and Comparative Constitutional Law, in Comparative Constitutional Theory (Gary Jacobsohn & Miguel Schor, editors) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2018) A Broad Read of Ely: Political Process Theory for New Democracies (with Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa), 19 Int’l J. Const. L. _ (forthcoming 2021) Federalism, Democracy, and the 2020 Election (with Hannah J. Wiseman & Samuel Wiseman), 99 Texas L. Rev. Online 96 (2021) The Comparative Constitutional Law of Presidential Impeachment (with Tom Ginsburg & Aziz Huq), 88 U. Chicago L. Rev. 81 (2021) The Causes and Consequences of a Judicialized Peace Process in Colombia, 18 Int’l J. Const. L. 1303 (2020) Personalism and the Trajectories of Populist Constitutions, 16 Ann. Rev. L. & Soc. Sci. 293 (2020) Federalism for the Worst Case (with Hannah Wiseman & Samuel Wiseman), 105 Iowa L. Rev. 1187 (2020) Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy (with Rosalind Dixon), 53 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1313 (2020) Constitutional End-Games: Making Presidential Term Limits Stick (with Rosalind Dixon), 71 Hastings L.J. 359 (2020) New Directions in the Comparative Law and Politics of Judicial Review (review of Theunis Roux, The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis and David M. Brinks & Abby Blass, The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America), 55 Tulsa L. Rev. 225 (2020) Choosing Between Simple and Complex Remedies in Socioeconomic Rights Cases, 69 U. Toronto L.J. 105 (2019) (continued on next page)

14 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

David E. Landau continued

From an Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment to an Unconstitutional Constitution? Lessons from Honduras (with Yaniv Roznai & Rosalind Dixon), 8 Global Constitutionalism 40 (2019) Presidential Term Limits in Latin America: Transnational Constitutional Dialogue as a Double-Edged Sword, 12 L. & Ethics Hum. Rts. 225 (2018) Constitutional Design, International Law and Vulnerable Insiders: The Victims of Internal Armed Conflict in Colombia, 57 Va. J. Int’l L. 679 (2018) Tiered Constitutional Design (with Rosalind Dixon), 86 Geo. Wash.

L. Rev. 438 (2018) Populist Constitutions, 85 U. Chi. L. Rev. 521 (2018)

TAHIRIH V. LEE Associate Professor P H .D ., H IS TO RY , Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY, 1990 J .D ., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 198 9 M.P H IL, H IS TO RY , Y ALE U NIV E RSITY, 1989 M.A., H IS TO RY , Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY, 1989 A.M., S TANFO RD U NIV E RS ITY , 1985 A.B., S TANFO RD U NIV E RS ITY , 1985

By the Light of the Moon: Looking for China’s Rich Legal Tradition, in Oxford Handbook of Historical Legal Research (Markus D. Dubber & Christopher Tomlins, editors) (Oxford University Press 2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 15

JAKE LINFORD Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F CH ICAGO , 2008 B.A., U NIV E RS ITY O F U TAH , 1996

The Path of the Trademark Injunction, in Research Handbook on the Law & Economics of Trademarks (Glynn Lunney, editor) (Edward Elgar Publishing) (forthcoming 2021) Democratizing Access to Survey Evidence of Distinctiveness, in Research Handbook on Trademark Law Reform (Graeme Dinwoodie & Mark Janis, editors) (Edward Elgar Publishing 2021) ‘Tell the Truth:’ Truth in Music Advertising Post Tam, in The Oxford Handbook of Music Law and Policy (Sean O’Connor, editor) (Oxford University Press 2020) Copyright and Attention Scarcity, 42 Cardozo L. Rev. 143 (2020) Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online (with Wayne Logan), 104 Minn. L. Rev. 101 (2019) Placebo Marks, 47 Pepp. L. Rev. 1 (2019) Valuing Residual Goodwill After Trademark Forfeiture, 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. 811 (2018) Datamining the Meaning(s) of Progress, 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1531 (2018)

Professor Jake Linford’s article, Copyright and Attention Scarcity, 42 Cardozo Law Review 143 (2020), argues that reducing copyright protection may worsen the costs of attention scarcity on consumers of creative expression. Linford argues that preserving copyright protections—especially the derivative right—may have unexpected benefits for consumers, including keeping attention costs in check.

Thus, lawmakers and judges should exercise caution before sacrificing the attention-assisting aspects of copyright protection based solely on the intuition that creators could survive with weaker incentives.

16 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

WAYNE A. LOGAN Steven M. Goldstein Professor J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F WIS CO NS IN , 1991 M.A., CRIMINO LO G Y , S TATE U NIVER SITY OF N EW YOR K, A L BA N Y, 1986 B.A., WE S LE Y AN U NIV E RS ITY , 19 83

Sentencing Law, Policy & Practice (with Michael O’Hear) (Foundation Press) (forthcoming 2022) The Ex Post Facto Clause: Its History and Role in A Punitive Society (Oxford University Press) (forthcoming 2022) Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws: An Empirical Evaluation (co-editor with J.J. Prescott) (Cambridge University Press 2021) Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction: Law, Policy and Practice (with Margaret Love & Jenny Roberts) (4th ed., Thomson Reuters 2021) Questions and Answers, Q & A: Criminal Procedure-Police Investigation (4th ed., Carolina Academic Press 2021) Questions and Answers, Q & A: Criminal Procedure-Adjudication (4th ed., Carolina Academic Press 2021) Florida Search and Seizure Law (LexisNexis 2020 & 2021) Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction: Law, Policy and Practice (with Margaret Love & Jenny Roberts) (3d ed., Thomson Reuters 2018)

In Crowdsourcing Crime Control, 99 Texas Law Review 137 (2020), Professor Wayne Logan describes the use of crowdsourcing techniques in criminal investigations, of late undertaken by police working alongside amateur web and forensic genetic sleuths, armchair detectives and others seeking to identify and apprehend criminal suspects. The article discusses how current doctrine is illequipped to address this development and provides a framework for its regulation, in the hope of ensuring that the wisdom of the crowd does not become the tyranny of the crowd.

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 17

Criminal Procedure: The Post-Investigative Process (with Stanley Adelman et al.) (5th ed., Carolina Academic Press 2018) Origins and Evolution of SORN Laws, in Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws: An Empirical Evaluation (co-editor with J.J. Prescott) (Cambridge University Press 2021) Community-based Approaches to Sex Offender Management, in What Works with Sexual Offenders: Contemporary Perspectives in Theory, Assessment, Treatment and Prevention ( Jean Proulx et al., editors) (Wiley-Blackwell 2020) Geography and Reasonable Suspicion in Auto Stops, 48 N. Ky. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2022) Sex Offender Registration in a Pandemic, 19 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. _ (forthcoming 2021) Crowdsourcing Crime Control, 99 Texas L. Rev. 137 (2020) The Case for Greater Transparency in Sixth Amendment Pretrial Right to Counsel Warnings, 52 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 23 (2019) Gundy v. United States: Gunning for the Administrative State, 17 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 185 (2019) Indiana v. Timbs: Toward the Regulation of Mercenary Criminal Justice, 32 Fed. Sent. Rep. 3 (2019) Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online (with Jake Linford), 104 Minn. L. Rev. 101 (2019) Policing Police Access to Criminal Justice Data, 104 Iowa L. Rev. 619 (2019) What the Feds Can Do to Rein in Local Mercenary Criminal Justice, 2019 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1731 (2019) Fourth Amendment Localism, 93 Ind. L.J. 369 (2018) Challenging the Punitiveness of “New Generation” SORN Laws, 21 New Crim. L. Rev. 426 (2018) False Massiah: The Sixth Amendment Revolution That Wasn’t, 50 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 153 (2018)

18 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

DAVID L. MARKELL (1953-2021) Professor Emeritus J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F V IRGINIA, 1 97 9 B.A., BRAND E IS U NIV E RS ITY , 197 5

Environmental Protection: Law and Policy (with Dan Bodansky, William W. Buzbee, Robert L. Glicksman, Emily Hammond & Daniel R. Mandelker) (8th ed., Aspen Law & Business 2019) An Empirical Assessment of Agency Mechanism Choice (with Robert Glicksman & Justin Sevier), 71 Ala. L. Rev. 1039 (2020) Unraveling the Administrative State: Mechanism Choice, Key Actors, and Regulatory Tools (with R. Glicksman), 36 Va. Envtl. L.J. 318 (2018)

MICHAEL T. MORLEY Associate Professor J .D ., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 20 0 3 A.B., P RINCE TO N U NIV E RS ITY , 2000

Floor Fight: Protecting the Presidential Nomination Process from LastMinute Manipulation of the Rules for National Party Conventions, in The Best Candidate: Presidential Nominations in Polarized Times (Eugene Mazo & Michael Dimino, editors) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Erroneous Injunctions, _ Emory L.J. _ (forthcoming 2022) The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, _ Fordham L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Interpreting Injunctions (with F. Andrew Hessick), _ Va. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) The Framers’ Inadvertent Gift: The Electoral College and the Constitutional Infirmities of the National Popular Vote Compact, _ Harv. L. & Pol’y Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Disaggregating the History of Nationwide Injunctions: A Response to Professor Sohoni, 72 Ala. L. Rev. 239 (2020)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 19

Bush v. Gore’s Uniformity Principle and the Equal Protection Right to Vote, 28 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 229 (2020) The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Federal Elections, and State Constitutions, 55 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (2020) The Enforcement Act of 1870, Federal Jurisdiction over Election Contests, and the Political Question Doctrine, 72 Fla. L. Rev. 1153 (2020) Book Review, Litigating Imperfect Solutions: State Constitutions in Federal Court, 35 Const. Comment. 401 (2020) Vertical Stare Decisis and Three-Judge District Courts, 108 Geo. L.J. 699 (2020) Postponing Federal Elections Due to Election Emergencies, 77 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online 179 (2020) Disaggregating Nationwide Injunctions, 71 Ala. L. Rev. 1 (2020) Book Review, Republicans and the Voting Rights Act, 54 Tulsa L. Rev. 281 (2019) Beyond the Elements: Erie and the Standards for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions, 52 Akron L. Rev. 457 (2019) (continued on next page)

In Interpreting Injunctions, _ Virginia Law Review _ (forthcoming 2021, with F. Andrew Hessick), Professor Michael Morley proposes that courts apply a modified textualist approach to injunctions. He suggests that courts should generally interpret injunctions according to the ordinary meaning of their language, but may consider whether a defendant’s acts undermined the injunction’s purpose at the remedial stage, when deciding whether to issue a contempt order. The article further recommends that appellate courts review trial courts’ interpretations of injunctions de novo to promote principles of notice and prevent government overreach.

20 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

Michael T. Morley continued

Spokeo: The Quasi-Hohfeldian Plaintiff and the Non-Federal Federal Question, 25 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 583 (2018)

Prophylactic Redistricting? Congress’s Section 5 Power and the New Equal Protection Right to Vote, 59 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2053 (2018) Election Emergencies: Voting in the Wake of Natural Disasters and Terrorist Attacks, 67 Emory L.J. 545 (2018) The Federal Equity Power, 59 B.C. L. Rev. 217 (2018) The Disparate Impact Canon, 166 U. Penn. L. Rev. Online 249 (2018)

ERIN O’HARA O’CONNOR Dean and McKenzie Professor J .D ., GE O RG E TO WN U NIV E RS ITY, 1990 B.A., U NIV E RS ITY O F RO CH E S TE R , 1 987

Conflict of Laws: Cases and Materials (with Lea Brilmayer & Jack Goldsmith) (8th ed., Aspen 2019) Conflict of Laws: A Recipe for Transformative Contributions, in Resolving Conflicts in the Law (Chiara Giorgetti & Natalie Klein, editors) (Brill Nijhoff 2019) Is Labor Arbitration Lawless? (with Ariana Levinson & Paige Marta Skiba), 48 Fla St. U. L. Rev. 447 (2021) Predictability of Arbitrators’ Reliance on External Authority? (with Ariana Levinson & Paige Marta Skiba), 69 Am. U. L. Rev. 1827 (2020) Protecting Consumer Privacy with Arbitration, 96 N.C. L. Rev. 711 (2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 21

ERIN RYAN Elizabeth C. & Clyde W. Atkinson Professor and Associate Dean for Environmental Programs J .D ., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 20 01 M.A., E TH NO MU S ICO LO G Y , WE S L EYA N UN IVER SITY, 1994 B.A., H ARV ARD -RAD CLIFFE CO LL EGE, 1 991

The Public Trust Doctrine, Private Rights in Water, and The Mono Lake Story (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2022) The Twin Environmental Law Problems of Preemption and Political Scale, in Environmental Law, Disrupted (Keith Hirokawa & Jessica Owley, editors) (Environmental Law Institute 2021) Federalism as Legal Pluralism, in The Oxford Handbook on Legal Pluralism (Paul Berman, editor) (2020) Environmental Rights for the 21st Century: Comparing the Public Trust Doctrine and the Rights of Nature Movement (with Holly Curry & Hayes Rule), 43 Cardozo L. Rev. _ (2021) Tribute to Professor David Markell: A Colleague among Colleagues, 36 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. _ (forthcoming 2021) (continued on next page)

Professor Erin Ryan’s co-authored article, Environmental Rights for the 21st Century: Comparing the Public Trust Doctrine and the Rights of Nature Movement, 43 Cardozo Law Review _ (forthcoming 2021, with Holly Curry & Hayes Rule), compares two theoretically distinct approaches to related objectives of environmental protection: the public trust doctrine and the rights of nature movement.

It reviews the development of both approaches in domestic and international contexts, contrasts their underlying environmental ethics and compares surprising points of pragmatic commonality as they unfold.

22 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

Erin Ryan continued

Environmental Law, Disrupted by COVID-19 (with Rebecca Bratspies, Vanessa Casado Perez, Robin Kundis Craig, Lissa Griffin, Keith Hirokawa, Sarah Krakoff, Katrina Kuh, Jessica Owley, Melissa Powers, Shannon Roesler, Jonathan Rosenbloom, J.B. Ruhl & David Takacs), 51 Envtl. L. Rep. 10509 (2021) A Short History of the Public Trust Doctrine and its Intersection with Private Water Law, 39 Va. Envtl. L.J. 135 (2020) Rationing the Constitution vs. Negotiating It: Coan, Mud, and Crystals in the Context of Dual Sovereignty, 2020 Wis. L. Rev. 165 (2020) From Mono Lake to the Atmospheric Trust: Navigating the Public and Private Interests in Public Trust Resource Commons, 10 Geo. Wash. J. Energy & Envtl. L. 39 (2019) Environmental Law. Disrupted. (with Inara Scott, David Takacs, Rebecca Bratspies, Vanessa Casado Pérez, Robin Kundis Craig, Keith Hirokawa, Blake Hudson, Sarah Krakoff, Katrina Fischer Kuh, Jessica Owley, Melissa Powers, Shannon Roesler, Jonathan Rosenbloom & J.B. Ruhl), 49 Envtl. L. Rep. 10038 (2019) Juliana v. United States: Debating the Fundamentals of the Fundamental Right to a Sustainable Climate (with Mary Wood, James Huffman, Richard Frank & Irma Russell), 45 Fla. St. L. Rev. Online 1 (2018) at fsulawreview.com/article/ juliana-v-united-states-debatingthe-fundamentals-of-the- fundamental-right-to-a-sustainable-climate/ Breathing Air with Heft: An Experiential Report on Environmental Regulation and Public Health in China, 42 U.C. Davis Environs 195 (2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 23

LAUREN SCHOLZ McConnaughhay and Rissman Professor J .D ., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 20 1 4 B.A., Y ALE U NIV E RS ITY , 20 0 9

Algorithms and Contract Law, in The Cambridge Handbook on the Law of Algorithms (Woodrow Barfield, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Algorithmic Contracts and Consumer Privacy, in The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms (Larry DiMatteo, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2019) Toward a Consumer Contract Law for an Algorithmic Age, in Law and Autonomous Systems (Horst Eidenmueller, editor) (C.H. Beck 2019) The Significance of Private Rights of Action in Privacy Regulation, 63 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Fiduciary Boilerplate: Locating Fiduciary Relationships in Information Age Transactions, 46 J. Corp. L. 143 (2020) Indivisibilities in Technology Regulation, 2020 U. Chi. L. Rev. Online 70 Big Data is Not Big Oil: The Role of Analogy in the Law of New Technologies, 86 Tenn. L. Rev. 863 (2019) Privacy Remedies, 93 Ind. L.J. 94 (2018)

In The Significance of Private Rights of Action in Privacy Regulation, 63 William & Mary Law Review _ (forthcoming 2021), Professor Lauren Scholz contests the conventional wisdom that states the key to providing individuals with more privacy protection is strengthening the power government has to directly sanction actors that hurt privacy interests of citizens. The article argues that private rights of action are essential for privacy regulation and provides examples of how private rights of action can improve privacy regulation in a suite of key modern privacy problems.

24 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

MARK B. SEIDENFELD Patricia A. Dore Professor of Administrative Law J .D ., S TANFO RD U NIV E RS ITY , 19 83 M.A., TH E O RE TICAL P H Y S ICS , BR A N DEIS UN IVER SITY, 197 9 B.A., RE E D CO LLE G E , 1975

Book Review, The Limits of Deliberation about the Public’s Values: Reviewing Blake Emerson, The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy, 119 Mich. L. Rev. 1111 (2021) Textualism’s Theoretical Bankruptcy and Its Implications for Statutory Interpretation, 100 B.U. L. Rev. 1817 (2020) The Bounds of Congress’s Spending Power, 61 Ariz. L. Rev. 1 (2019) The Problem with Agency Guidance – or Not, 36 Yale J. on Reg.: Notice & Comment (2019), at http://yalejreg.com/nc/the-problemwith-agency-guidance-or-not-by-mark-seidenfeld/ A Process-Based Approach to Presidential Exit, 67 Duke L.J. 1775 (2018) Revisiting Congressional Delegation of Interpretive Primacy as Foundation for Chevron Deference, 24 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 3 (2018)

In The Limits of Deliberation about the Public’s Values, 119 Michigan Law Review 1111 (2021), Professor Mark Seidenfeld reviews The Public’s Law: Origins and Architecture of Progressive Democracy and argues that author Blake Emerson’s suggestions for how to achieve American administrative law that is deeply democratically deliberative are unrealistic. The article provides a different theory on the best way to implement deliberative democracy via the regulatory process.

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 25

JUSTIN T. SEVIER Charles W. Ehrhardt Professor of Litigation P H .D ., P S Y CH O LO G Y , Y ALE U NIVER SITY, EX PECTED 2021 M.S. AND M.PHIL., SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, YALE UNIVERSITY, 2013 J .D ., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 20 06 A.B., CO RNE LL U NIV E RS ITY , 20 03

Evidence Law and Empirical Psychology, in Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law (Christian Dahlman, Alex Stein & Giovanni Tuzet, editors) (Oxford University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Procedural Justice in COVID-19-Era Civil Courts, 71 DePaul L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) A [Relational] Theory of Procedure, 104 Minn. L. Rev. 1978 (2020) An Empirical Assessment of Agency Mechanism Choice (with David L. Markell & Robert Glicksman), 71 Ala. L. Rev. 1039 (2020) The Paradox of Executive Compensation Regulation (with Minor Myers), 44 J. Corp. L. 755 (2019) Legitimizing Character Evidence, 68 Emory L.J. 441 (2019) Consumers, “Seller-Advisors,” and the Psychology of Trust (with Kelli Alces Williams), 59 B.C. L. Rev. 931 (2018) Evidentiary Trapdoors, 103 Iowa L. Rev. 1155 (2018)

Professor Justin Sevier’s article, A [Relational] Theory of Procedure, 104 Minnesota Law Review 1978 (2020), proffers an updated model of the institutional legitimacy of legal tribunals informed by insights from experimental social psychology. It reports the results from three original psychology experiments which demonstrate the perceived legitimacy of legal dispute resolution is enhanced when the public perceives an alignment between the goals of a legal dispute and the perceived priorities of the procedure that resolves the dispute.

26 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

MARK SPOTTSWOOD David and Deborah Fonvielle Professor J .D ., NO RTH WE S TE RN U NIV E RS ITY, 2007 B.S ., NO RTH WE S TE RN U NIV E RS ITY, 2002

Burdens of Proof, in Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law (Christian Dahlman, Alex Stein & Giovanni Tuzet, editors) (Oxford University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Paradoxes of Proof, in Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law (Christian Dahlman, Alex Stein & Giovanni Tuzet, editors) (Oxford University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Continuous Burdens of Proof, _ Nev. L.J. _ (forthcoming 2021) Proof Discontinuities and Civil Settlements, 22 Theoretical Inquiries in L. 201 (2020) On the Limitations of a Unitary Model of the Proof Process, 23 Int’l J. Evidence & Proof 75 (2019) Truth, Lies, and the Confrontation Clause, 89 Colo. L. Rev. 565 (2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 27

NAT S. STERN John W. & Ashley E. Frost Professor J .D ., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 197 9 A.B., BRO WN U NIV E RS ITY , 1976

The Enduring Enigma of Public Official Status in Libel Law, 54 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) The Stubborn Survival of the Central Hudson Test for Commercial Speech, 45 Seattle ​​U. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Guess Who? Reducing the Role of Juries in Determining Libel Plaintiffs’ Identities, 93 St. John’s L. Rev. 101 (2020) Don’t Answer That: Revisiting the Political Question Doctrine in State Courts, 21 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 153 (2018) Judicial Candidates’ Rights to Lie, 77 Md. L. Rev. 774 (2018) The Judicial and Generational Dispute over Transgender Rights (with Mark Joseph Stern, Karen Oehme, Ember Urbach & Elena Simonsen), 29 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 159 (2018)

28 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

SARAH L. SWAN Assistant Professor J .S .D ., CO LU MBIA U NIV E RS ITY , 2016 LL.M., CO LU MBIA U NIV E RS ITY , 2010 J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F BRITIS H COL UMBIA , 2004 B.A., U NIV E RS ITY O F BRITIS H COL UMBIA , 2001

Constitutional Off-loading at the City Limits, 135 Harv. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2022) Tort Law and Feminism, in The Oxford Handbook on Feminism and Law in the United States (Deborah L. Brakes et al., editors) (forthcoming 2021) Farwell v. Keaton: Rewritten Opinion, in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Torts Opinions (Lucinda Finley & Martha Chamallas, editors) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Running Interference: The Role of Third Parties in Preemption, Petition, and the Powers of Local Government, 36 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. _ (forthcoming 2021) Exclusion Diffusion, 70 Emory L.J. 847 (2021) Procedural Discriminatory Dualism: Campus Sexual Assault and Title IX, 73 Okla. L. Rev. 69 (2020) Discriminatory Dualism, 54 Ga. L. Rev. 869 (2020)

In Constitutional Off-loading at the City Limits, 135 Harvard Law Review _ (forthcoming 2022), Professor Sarah Swan explores whether municipalities may exclude constitutionally-protected land uses by pointing to availability in a neighboring town. She shows that courts have adopted a tailored approach, allowing small localities, but not large cities, to engage in constitutional off-loading, and discusses the ensuing implications for localism, urban and rural polarization, and city-state power relations.

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 29

Aiding and Abetting Matters, 12 J. Tort L. 255 (2019) Preempting Plaintiff Cities, 45 Ford. Urb. L.J. 1241 (2019) Plaintiff Cities, 71 Vand. L. Rev. 1227 (2018)

MANUEL A. UTSET, JR. William & Catherine VanDercreek Professor and Associate Dean for Juris Master Programs J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F MICH IGAN, 1987 B.S ., GE O RG E TO WN U NIV E RS ITY, 1 984

Predictive Policing and Criminal Law, in Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence ( John L.M. McDaniel & Ken Pease, editors) (Routledge 2021)

DONALD J. WEIDNER Dean Emeritus and Alumni Centennial Professor J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F TE XAS AT AUSTIN , 1969 B.S ., FO RD H AM U NIV E RS ITY , 1966

The Unfortunate Role of Special Litigation Committees in LLCs, _ Bus. Law. _ (forthcoming 2022) LLC Default Rules Are Hazardous to Member Liquidity, 76 Bus. Law. 151 (2020) The Revised Uniform Partnership Act (with Robert W. Hillman & Allan G. Donn) (Thomson Reuters 2020) (also 2018, 2019 eds.)

Dissatisfied Members in Florida LLCs: Remedies, 18 Fla. St. Bus. Rev. 1 (2019)

30 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

KELLI ALCES WILLIAMS Matthews & Hawkins Professor of Property and Associate Dean for Research J .D ., U NIV E RS ITY O F ILLINO IS , 2005 B.A., CO LLE GE O F WILLIAM AND MA R Y, 2001

Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten (co-editor with A. Choike & U. Rodrigues) (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2022) Introduction (with A. Choike & U. Rodrigues), in Feminist Judgments: Corporate Law Rewritten (co-editor with A. Choike & U. Rodrigues) (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2022) Self-Interested Fiduciaries and Invulnerable Beneficiaries: When Fiduciary Duties Don’t Fit, in Fiduciary Obligations in Business (Arthur B. Laby & Jacob Hale Russell, editors) (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Leaders Are Not Fiduciaries, 72 Ala. L. Rev. 363 (2020) Market-Based Innovation in Consumer Protection, 51 Conn. L. Rev. 155 (2019) Externalizing Board Governance Means Changing the Board’s Function, 74 Bus. Law. 297 (2019) Consumers, “Seller-Advisors,” and the Psychology of Trust (with Justin Sevier), 59 B.C. L. Rev. 931 (2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 31

MARY ZIEGLER Stearns Weaver Miller Professor J .D ., H ARV ARD U NIV E RS ITY , 20 07 B.A., H ARV ARD CO LLE GE , 20 0 4

Abortion and The Constitution (Routledge Press) (forthcoming 2023) Dollars for Life: The Antiabortion Movement, Campaign Finance, and the Transformation of the Republican Party (Yale University Press) (forthcoming 2022) Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present (Cambridge University Press 2020) Beyond Abortion: Roe v. Wade and the Battle for Privacy (Harvard University Press 2018) Before Roe v. Wade, in Cambridge History of Sexuality in the United States (Nicholas Syrett & Jennifer Mannion, editors) (Cambridge University Press) (forthcoming 2022) Introduction, in International Abortion Law: A Research Handbook (Mary Ziegler, editor) (Edward Elgar Publishing) (forthcoming 2022)

(continued on next page)

Professor Mary Ziegler has published three books and numerous chapters and articles that examine the legal history of the abortion debate, and she is working on two forthcoming books. She is widely quoted in the national and international media for her expertise in the area and has published multiple opinion pieces in outlets including The New York Times and The Washington Post. Her latest book, Abortion And The Law In America: Roe V. Wade To The Present (Cambridge University Press 2020), studies the legal history that has shaped contemporary constitutional battles about abortion, helping to make sense of the current polarization of the conflict.

32 | FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSIT Y COLLEGE OF L AW

Mary Ziegler continued

Women’s Body, Women’s Right: Abortion Before Roe v. Wade, in The Cambridge History of Sexuality in the United States (Nicholas Syrett & Jen Manion, editors) (forthcoming 2022) From Reproductive Rights to Reproductive Justice, in The Oxford Handbook of Feminism Law in the United States (Deborah Brake, Martha Chamallas & Verna Williams, editors) (Oxford University Press) (forthcoming 2021) Roe v. Wade and the Cultural Politics of Abortion, in The Companion to the Politics of American Health (Sophia A. Jones & Martin Halliwell, editors) (University of Edinburgh Press) (forthcoming 2021) Comment: Young v. UPS, in Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Reproductive Justice (Kim Mutcherson, editor) (Cambridge University Press 2020) Unsettled Law: Social-Movement Conflict, Stare Decisis, and Roe v.

Wade, _ Conn. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2022) Abortion and the Law of Innocence, _ U. Ill. L. Rev. _ (forthcoming 2021) Unessential: Abortion Law Before and After COVID-19, _ Cornell L. Rev. Online _ (forthcoming 2021) Contesting the Legacy of the Nineteenth Amendment: Abortion and Equality from Roe to the Present, 92 U. Colo. L. Rev. 751 (2021) Bad Effects: The Misuse of History in Box v. Planned Parenthood, 105 Cornell L. Rev. Online 165 (2020) Earned Rights, 44 N.Y.U. J.L. & Soc. Change 261 (2020) Men’s Reproductive Rights, 47 Pepp. L. Rev. 665 (2020) Taming Unworkability Doctrine: Rethinking Stare Decisis, 50 Ariz.

St. L.J. 1215 (2018) What is Race?, 50 Conn. L. Rev. 279 (2018) Beyond Balancing: Rethinking the Law of Embryo Disposition, 68 Am. U. L. Rev. 515 (2018)

FACULT Y SCHOL ARSHIP | 33

Rethinking an Undue Burden: Whole Woman’s Health’s New Approach to Fundamental Rights, 85 Tenn. L. Rev. 461 (2018) After Life: Governmental Interests and the New Antiabortion Incrementalism, 73 U. Miami L. Rev. 78 (2018) The Jurisprudence of Uncertainty: Knowledge, Science, and Abortion, 2018 Wis. L. Rev. 317 (2018) What is Sexual Orientation?, 106 Ky. L.J. 61 (2018) Some Kind of Punishment: Penalizing Women for Abortion, 26 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 735 (2018) The New Negative Rights: Abortion Funding and Constitutional Law after Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 96 Neb. L. Rev. 577 (2018) Facing the Facts: The New Era of Abortion Conflict After Whole Woman’s Health, 52 Wake Forest L. Rev. 231 (2018)

COLLEGE OF LAW

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY TALLAHASSEE, FL 32306-1601 la w.f s u. e du

NONPROFIT ORG US POSTAGE PAID TALLAHASSEE, FL PERMIT #55