www.financialstandard.com.au
06
11
22
Aware Super, SSGA
Financial advice
MAX Awards
07
14
32
Andrew Russell Class
Custody
Phil Anderson AFA
News:
Opinion:
Advice reforms to avail wealthy clients Karren Vergara
he barrage of financial advice industry reT forms is working in favour of the rich and driving an even bigger inequality gap that is making it difficult for everyday Australians to access advice. The exodus of financial advisers is forging an even bigger divide. The total number of authorised financial advisers has declined to 19,922 as at June 3, according to ASIC’s Financial Adviser Register, marking about a 30% slump since 2018. All these factors will come to a head at the end of 2021, as the total number of advisers is tipped to fall to 15,000, according to Colin Williams, a consultant to advice practices and director of Wealth Data. Even the major banks’ withdrawal from advice will potentially cause bigger issues down the track, Williams says; “In 2017, the banks had 2500 financial advisers. There are now less than 500.” The big banks’ vertically integrated networks were able to reach many mums and dads, whose first exposure to advice was via financial planners embedded in branches. The banks were once the “nursery” for financial advisers, who have now either left the industry or set up their own practices, he says, adding that no other organisations have stepped in to take the mantle from the banks. Many predicted that the superannuation funds will fill that hole. “But they are losing advisers as well. In 2017, super funds had 1260 advisers, but there are now 890,” Williams says. Modelling by the University of New South Wales using ATO FY2017-18 data reveals Australians’ wealth is distributed “extremely unequally”. Average wealth stood at $1.026 million. The top 20% meanwhile have $3.26 million on average – 90 times more wealth than the bottom 20% with $36,000. Some advisers are turning away clients with assets less than $300,000, choosing instead to service the high end of town, not only because they bring in more revenue, but they require less pen pushing. Lime Actuarial founder Greg Einfeld knows many advisers whose threshold is between $500,000 to $1 million. Some will only talk to clients with either $2.5 million of assets or earn $250,000 in income. This is because the rules for advising sophisticated investors are more relaxed and make it
easier for advisers to meet their compliance obligations, he says. By way of example, advisers do not need to complete a Statement of Advice or meet their best interest obligations. “They still need to do the right thing by the client, but the regulatory obligations [in terms of] dotting the Is and crossing the Ts falls away,” he says. “When the regulators swing the pendulum too far, it is not that simple to undo the harm that is being done.” Credit Suisse estimates that Australia’s median wealth per adult is $315,000 in 2020. “There is still considerable wealth and income inequality in Australia despite us having one of the highest levels of median wealth in the world,” Lifespan Financial Planning chair and founder John Ardino says. Ardino suggests several ways advice can be made more affordable. One recommendation is for the government to provide a tax incentive for for the cost of the initial advice. “If we assume that the numerous superannuation, tax, investment and insurance options, not to mention aged care and estate planning rules, require advice, then the government should support those who may be challenged paying for the requisite financial counselling,” he says. Another suggestion is reforming pro-bono advice. While some advisers already provide this, Ardino says it can be made widely available if the government relaxes some of the onerous requirements. The industry had high hopes in making roboadvice a silver bullet for clients with less assets. But the regulatory landscape is making it challenging for robo-advisers to flourish. Einfeld, who co-founded the now-defunct robo-adviser Plenty, knows too well the difficulty in making holistic digital advice attainable after ASIC determined it did not meet sections of the Corporations Act despite receiving guidance on several occasions that it was compliant. Australians, particularly Millennials, are now turning to ‘finfluencers’, an unregulated channel in which social media influencers dish out financial management and share trading tips on TikTok and Instagram. Self-education is the way to go for those who cannot afford a qualified financial adviser, Willaims says; “But ultimately, you want someone to tell you that what you are doing is correct.” fs
28 June 2021 | Volume 19 Number 12 www.financialstandard.com.au 20 January 2020 | Volume 18 Number 01
Featurette:
Feature:
Events:
Profile:
Your Future, Your Super passes Elizabeth McArthur
Greg Einfeld
founder Lime Actuarial
The Your Future, Your Super reforms were passed in the Senate on June 17. One Nation and Jackie Lambie voted with the government in favour of the bill, while Labor and the Greens objected to it. However, an amendment was passed which will delay benchmarking and stapling until November. Independent Senator Rex Patrick failed to find support for his proposed amendment, which would have extended performance tests to more choice products in the retail super sector. Labor Senator Deborah O’Neill passionately opposed the reforms. “How could it be that someone who calls themselves a Liberal could vote for this bill, could bring into this chamber a bill, which contains in it a provision to enable the Australian Treasurer to take control of Australian people’s savings and to give that Treasurer the power to direct the way their savings are invested?” she said. The reforms will see members stapled to the first Continued on page 4
AFA calls out Labor attack Karren Vergara
The Association of Financial Advisers has slammed the Labor Party’s attack on financial advisers, which paints the profession as dodgy and continuing to rip-off consumers. AFA acting chief executive Phil Anderson is calling for an end to the “persecution” of financial advisers, after hearing shadow cabinet secretary Jenny McAllister’s comments on June 17 in debating the Treasury Laws Amendment (SelfManaged Superannuation Funds) Bill 2020 that is proposing the maximum number of SMSF members is increased from four to six. McAllister said that Labor does not support the bill, arguing that having six members will not make a meaningful contribution to delivering better member outcomes in an environment where barriers to accessing un-conflicted financial advice persist. “That’s at the heart of our concerns about this bill, because the risk is that the people who Continued on page 4