DENTAL-2935; No. of Pages 9
ARTICLE IN PRESS d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s x x x ( 2 0 1 7 ) xxx–xxx
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/dema
Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin Jiale Fu a,∗ , Pipop Saikaew b , Shimpei Kawano c , Ricardo M. Carvalho d , Matthias Hannig e , Hidehiko Sano c , Denis Selimovic c a
General Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, No. 117 Nanjing Street, Heping District, 110002 Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China b Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, No. 6, Yothi Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok 10400, Thailand c Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Science, Hokkaido University, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Kita 13, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan d Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Division of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada e Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany
a r t i c l e
i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Objectives. To evaluate the influence of different air-blowing durations on the micro-tensile
Received 2 January 2017
bond strength (TBS) of five current one-step adhesive systems to dentin.
Received in revised form
Methods. One hundred and five caries-free human molars and five current one-step adhe-
22 March 2017
sive systems were used: ABU (All Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.), CUB (CLEARFILTM Universal
Accepted 23 March 2017
Bond, Kuraray), GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), OBA (OptiBond All-in-one, Kerr) and SBU (Scotch-
Available online xxx
bond Universal, 3M ESPE). The adhesives were applied to 600 SiC paper-flat dentin surfaces
Keywords:
pressure of 0.25 MPa for either 0 s, 5 s, 15 s or 30 s before light-curing. Bond strength to dentin
Micro-tensile bond strength
was determined by using TBS test after 24 h of water storage. The fracture pattern on the
according to each manufacturer’s instructions and were air-dried with standard, oil-free air
Universal system
dentin surface was analyzed by SEM. The resin–dentin interface of untested specimens was
Panoramic SEM
visualized by panoramic SEM image. Data from TBS were analyzed using two-way ANOVA
Adhesion
(adhesive vs. air-blowing time), and Games-Howell (a = 0.05).
Air-blowing time
Results. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of materials (p = 0.000) and air-
Maximum bond strength
blowing time (p = 0.000) on bond strength to dentin. The interaction between factors was also significantly different (p = 0.000). Maximum bond strength for each system were recorded, OBA/15 s (76.34 ± 19.15 MPa), SBU/15 s (75.18 ± 12.83 MPa), CUB/15 s (68.23 ± 16.36 MPa), GPB/30 s (55.82 ± 12.99 MPa) and ABU/15 s (44.75 ± 8.95 MPa). The maximum bond strength of OBA and SUB were significantly higher than that of GPB and ABU (p < 0.05). Significance. The bond strength of the current one-step adhesive systems is materialdependent (p = 0.000), and was influenced by air-blowing duration (p = 0.000). For the current
∗
Corresponding author. E-mail address: fullers@126.com (J. Fu). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015 0109-5641/© 2017 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Please cite this article in press as: Fu J, et al. Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015