Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strenght of current one-step adhesives to dentin

Page 1

DENTAL-2935; No. of Pages 9

ARTICLE IN PRESS d e n t a l m a t e r i a l s x x x ( 2 0 1 7 ) xxx–xxx

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/dema

Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin Jiale Fu a,∗ , Pipop Saikaew b , Shimpei Kawano c , Ricardo M. Carvalho d , Matthias Hannig e , Hidehiko Sano c , Denis Selimovic c a

General Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, No. 117 Nanjing Street, Heping District, 110002 Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China b Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, No. 6, Yothi Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok 10400, Thailand c Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Science, Hokkaido University, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Kita 13, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8586, Japan d Department of Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, Division of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada e Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany

a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t

Article history:

Objectives. To evaluate the influence of different air-blowing durations on the micro-tensile

Received 2 January 2017

bond strength (␮TBS) of five current one-step adhesive systems to dentin.

Received in revised form

Methods. One hundred and five caries-free human molars and five current one-step adhe-

22 March 2017

sive systems were used: ABU (All Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.), CUB (CLEARFILTM Universal

Accepted 23 March 2017

Bond, Kuraray), GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), OBA (OptiBond All-in-one, Kerr) and SBU (Scotch-

Available online xxx

bond Universal, 3M ESPE). The adhesives were applied to 600 SiC paper-flat dentin surfaces

Keywords:

pressure of 0.25 MPa for either 0 s, 5 s, 15 s or 30 s before light-curing. Bond strength to dentin

Micro-tensile bond strength

was determined by using ␮TBS test after 24 h of water storage. The fracture pattern on the

according to each manufacturer’s instructions and were air-dried with standard, oil-free air

Universal system

dentin surface was analyzed by SEM. The resin–dentin interface of untested specimens was

Panoramic SEM

visualized by panoramic SEM image. Data from ␮TBS were analyzed using two-way ANOVA

Adhesion

(adhesive vs. air-blowing time), and Games-Howell (a = 0.05).

Air-blowing time

Results. Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of materials (p = 0.000) and air-

Maximum bond strength

blowing time (p = 0.000) on bond strength to dentin. The interaction between factors was also significantly different (p = 0.000). Maximum bond strength for each system were recorded, OBA/15 s (76.34 ± 19.15 MPa), SBU/15 s (75.18 ± 12.83 MPa), CUB/15 s (68.23 ± 16.36 MPa), GPB/30 s (55.82 ± 12.99 MPa) and ABU/15 s (44.75 ± 8.95 MPa). The maximum bond strength of OBA and SUB were significantly higher than that of GPB and ABU (p < 0.05). Significance. The bond strength of the current one-step adhesive systems is materialdependent (p = 0.000), and was influenced by air-blowing duration (p = 0.000). For the current

Corresponding author. E-mail address: fullers@126.com (J. Fu). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015 0109-5641/© 2017 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Please cite this article in press as: Fu J, et al. Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.