Exness vs FBS Comparison
Choosing the right forex broker is a critical decision for traders, as it directly impacts trading costs, execution speed, and overall success in the dynamic forex market. Two well-known brokers, Exness vs FBS, often come up in discussions among traders due to their competitive offerings and global presence. In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll dive into the key aspects of Exness vs FBS, including regulation, trading platforms, account types, fees, trading instruments, customer support, and more, to help you decide which broker best suits your trading needs in 2025.
Overview of Exness vs FBS
Exness: A Trusted Global Leader
Founded in 2008, Exness has established itself as a leading forex and CFD broker, headquartered in Cyprus. Known for its transparency, competitive spreads, and advanced trading technology, Exness caters to both beginner and professional traders. With a monthly trading volume exceeding $4 trillion and over 145,400 active traders worldwide, Exness is a powerhouse in the forex industry. It is regulated by top-tier authorities like the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), ensuring a high level of trust and security.
FBS:
A Retail Trader Favorite
FBS, established in 2009, is a Belize-based broker with a strong presence in Asia, particularly in countries like Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia. FBS is renowned for its user-friendly platforms, low minimum deposits, and attractive promotional offers. With over 17 million clients and a focus on accessibility, FBS appeals to beginners and experienced traders alike. It operates under the regulation of the International Financial Services Commission (IFSC) in Belize and other authorities, though its regulatory framework is less stringent compared to Exness.
Regulation and Security: Which Broker is Safer?
Regulation is a cornerstone of a broker’s credibility, ensuring the safety of client funds and adherence to industry standards.
Exness: Exness is regulated by multiple top-tier authorities, including the FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), Financial Services Commission (FSC) in Seychelles, and Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in South Africa. These regulatory bodies enforce strict standards, such as segregating client funds from company funds and providing negative balance protection. Exness is also a member of the Financial Commission, offering an investor compensation fund of up to €20,000 per trader. This robust regulatory framework makes Exness a highly trustworthy choice.
FBS: FBS operates under the IFSC in Belize, which is considered a Tier-3 regulator with less stringent oversight compared to FCA or CySEC. It also holds licenses from CySEC (for its European entity) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). While FBS segregates client funds and offers negative balance protection, its primary regulation under the IFSC may raise concerns for traders prioritizing maximum security.
Verdict: Exness has an edge in regulation due to its oversight by multiple Tier-1 and Tier-2 authorities, making it a safer option for traders who value robust client protection.
Trading Platforms: Which Offers Better Tools?
The trading platform is the backbone of your trading experience, providing tools for analysis, execution, and strategy development.
Exness: Exness supports MetaTrader 4 (MT4), MetaTrader 5 (MT5), and its proprietary Exness Terminal and Exness Trade App. The Exness Terminal is user-friendly, offering advanced charting, real-time market data, and mobile accessibility. Both MT4 and MT5 are industry standards, providing robust tools for technical analysis, automated trading via Expert Advisors (EAs), and multi-asset trading. Exness’s platforms are known for ultra-low latency and fast order execution, ideal for scalpers and high-frequency traders.
FBS: FBS also offers MT4 and MT5, alongside its proprietary FBS Trader app, designed for mobile trading. The FBS Trader app is intuitive, with features like real-time market news, price alerts, and charting tools, making it appealing for traders on the go. FBS’s platforms support scalping, hedging, and copy trading, catering to diverse trading styles. However, its platform suite is slightly less advanced compared to Exness’s proprietary offerings.
Verdict: Both brokers offer MT4 and MT5, but Exness’s proprietary Exness Terminal and faster execution speeds give it a slight advantage, especially for professional traders.
Account Types: Flexibility for All Traders
Account types determine the accessibility and cost structure for traders, catering to different experience levels and strategies.
Exness: Exness offers five account types: Standard, Standard Cent, Pro, Raw Spread, and Zero. The Standard and Standard Cent accounts are ideal for beginners, with low minimum deposits (as low as $10 in some regions) and commission-free trading. The Pro, Raw Spread, and Zero accounts cater to experienced traders, offering tighter spreads (from 0.1 pips) and low commissions (as low as $0.05 per lot for the Zero account). Exness also provides swap-free Islamic accounts for all account types.
FBS: FBS offers a range of accounts, including Cent, Micro, Standard, Zero Spread, and ECN. The Cent and Micro accounts are beginner-friendly, with minimum deposits as low as $5. The Zero Spread account appeals to traders seeking tight spreads (from 0.0 pips) but involves a commission. FBS’s high leverage (up to 1:3000) is a standout feature, though it comes with increased risk. Like Exness, FBS offers swap-free accounts, but only for specific regions.
Verdict: Exness provides more account variety and lower minimum deposits for professional accounts, while FBS is better for beginners due to its ultra-low $5 deposit requirement.
Fees and Spreads: Which is More Cost-Effective?
Trading costs, including spreads and commissions, are critical when choosing a broker.
Exness: Exness is known for competitive spreads, with the Standard account averaging 1.0 pips on EUR/USD, below the industry average of 1.08 pips. The Raw Spread and Zero accounts offer spreads as low as 0.0 pips with commissions starting at $0.05 per lot per side. Exness also provides commission-free trading on its Standard accounts and does not charge withdrawal fees, making it cost-effective.
FBS: FBS offers variable spreads starting from 0.7 pips on its Standard account and 0.0 pips on the Zero Spread account, though the latter incurs a commission. FBS’s commission-free accounts have slightly higher spreads compared to Exness. Additionally,
FBS may charge withdrawal fees depending on the payment method, which could increase trading costs.
Verdict: Exness generally offers lower spreads and a more transparent fee structure, making it the better choice for cost-conscious traders.
Trading Instruments: Diversity of Options
A diverse range of trading instruments allows traders to explore multiple markets and diversify their portfolios.
Exness: Exness provides access to over 230 instruments, including forex (over 90 currency pairs), CFDs, cryptocurrencies (34 options, including Bitcoin and Ethereum), stocks, indices, metals, energies, and commodities. This extensive selection makes Exness suitable for traders looking to diversify across asset classes.
FBS: FBS offers forex, metals, indices, energies, stocks, and a smaller selection of cryptocurrencies (5 options). While FBS’s instrument range is broad, it is less extensive than Exness, particularly in the cryptocurrency market.
Verdict: Exness has a clear advantage with a wider range of trading instruments, especially for cryptocurrency traders.
Deposit and Withdrawal: Speed and Convenience
Efficient and cost-effective deposit and withdrawal processes are essential for a seamless trading experience.
Exness: Exness supports a variety of payment methods, including bank transfers, credit/debit cards, e-wallets (Skrill, Neteller), and cryptocurrencies. Deposits are instant, and withdrawals are processed within 24 hours, often instantly for verified accounts. Exness does not charge withdrawal fees, adding to its appeal.
FBS: FBS also offers multiple payment options, including bank cards, e-wallets, and cryptocurrencies like USDT. Deposits are typically instant, but withdrawals can take 5–20
minutes via FBS’s automated system. However, FBS may charge higher withdrawal fees depending on the method, which could be a drawback.
Verdict: Exness leads with faster, fee-free withdrawals and broader deposit currency support.
Customer Support and Education: Which Broker Supports Traders Better?
Quality customer support and educational resources are vital, especially for beginners.
Exness: Exness offers 24/7 multilingual customer support via live chat, email, and phone. Its educational resources include webinars, tutorials, and market analysis from FXStreet and Trading Central. Exness’s focus on education is strong but less extensive compared to FBS.
FBS: FBS provides 24/7 support in multiple languages and excels in educational offerings, including forex guides, webinars, trading ideas, and a Forex Intensive course. FBS also hosts seminars and events to engage its trading community, making it a top choice for beginners.
Verdict: FBS stands out for its comprehensive educational resources and community engagement, while Exness offers reliable support with a slightly less robust educational suite.
Pros and Cons: A Quick Summary
Exness Pros
Regulated by multiple Tier-1 authorities (FCA, CySEC).
Ultra-low spreads (from 0.0 pips) and low commissions.
Wide range of trading instruments (230+), including 34 cryptocurrencies.
Fast, fee-free withdrawals and instant deposits.
Proprietary Exness Terminal for enhanced trading.
Exness Cons
Educational resources are less extensive compared to FBS.
High leverage (up to 1:2000) may pose risks for inexperienced traders.
FBS Pros
Low minimum deposit ($5) for beginner accounts.
Extensive educational resources and community events.
High leverage (up to 1:3000) for experienced traders.
User-friendly FBS Trader app for mobile trading.
FBS Cons
Weaker regulation (primarily IFSC).
Higher withdrawal fees compared to Exness.
Fewer trading instruments, especially in cryptocurrencies.
Which Broker is Better in 2025?
Choosing between Exness vs FBS depends on your trading goals and preferences:
Choose Exness if: You prioritize a well-regulated broker with tight spreads, low fees, and a wide range of trading instruments. Exness is ideal for professional traders, scalpers, and those interested in cryptocurrency trading due to its robust platforms and fast execution.
Choose FBS if: You’re a beginner seeking low minimum deposits, extensive educational resources, and high leverage. FBS’s community-focused approach and promotional offers make it appealing for retail traders.
Both brokers are reputable, but Exness generally offers a more competitive and secure trading environment, particularly for experienced traders. FBS, however, shines for beginners with its accessibility and educational support.
Conclusion
In the Exness vs FBS comparison, both brokers have unique strengths that cater to different trader profiles. Exness excels in regulation, low-cost trading, and instrument diversity, making it a top choice for professionals. FBS stands out for its beginner-friendly accounts, high leverage, and extensive educational resources. Ultimately, your decision should align with your trading style, risk tolerance, and priorities. Evaluate your needs, test demo accounts, and choose the broker that best supports your journey in the forex market.
