Instituto Mexicano de la Construcción en Acero (IMCA) X SIMPOSIO INTERNACIONAL Querétaro, Qro. - Marzo 2009
RECENT RESEARCH PROMOTES AND AIDS STEEL CONSTRUCTION
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT • • • • • • • •
Materials Members Connections Systems Demand vs supply Reliability Performance Codes
Tradition – and very practical
Expanded tradition – looking ahead
Engineering research: refined models, analysis, tests, practice, economy
THEORY TO PRACTICE
MATERIALS • Traditional steels: mild (C-Mn), HSLA, weathering • Newer steels: – – – – – – –
High performance steels (HPS) Fire-resistant steels Seismic steels Off-shore structures steel Low yield stress steels Very high strength steels Hot-rolled vs cold-formed shapes and plates – Structural stainless steels and shapes
STEELMAKING CHANGES • Use of EAF, scrap and continuous casting is much more efficient and economical, gives a much higher quality steel, and is environmentally friendly • Problems such as laminations and lamellar tearing have essentially gone away • Continuous casting is now also used for very thin sheet steel (less than 1 mm) • The change from BOF, iron ore, coke and ingots has taken place in some, but not all countries
The Steel Material The changes in steel production methods have resulted in: – Much higher quality material – More uniform crystalline structure – Much closer defined and improved mechanical and other properties – Significantly lower carbon content – Excellent toughness and weldability – The old problem of lamellar tearing has effectively gone away
Where Are We Headed? • For most structures, the traditional steels will continue to be most practical, serving all performance needs • For special applications and certain structural forms, HPS and seismic steels will be common • For certain structural applications, very high strength steels will be the choice • Cold-formed steels and structures will occupy a significantly increasing market share • Structural stainless has potential, but costs are still very high
RESEARCH ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS: BEAMS AND COLUMNS
SOME CURRENT ISSUES • Curved plate and box girders • Cold-straightened columns • Composite columns, especially with very high strength concrete • Buckling-restrained braces for braced seismic frames • Deflection of cambered beams • Members in existing and older structures
Cambered Beam Deflections: Influence of Bauschinger Effect?
CAMBERING CAN BE PROBLEMATIC “It is easy to just bend the shape a little” But if there are holes in flanges, fracture may take place Specify that holes should be made AFTER cambering
CONNECTIONS • Major influence on construction economy: 50 % and more of a project framing cost is tied to connections • Connections influence member response and frame response • Analysis with suitable connection properties can be very complex – but is needed and (now) required by codes • Consequently, there is a very large number of current studies of connection behavior and strength
CONNECTION STUDIES • Fasteners and fastening systems: mostly traditional, apart from studies of very high strength bolts, undermatched welds, novel mechanical fasteners (especially for cold-formed structures) • Compression joints (splices) • High strength tension joints
CONNECTION STUDIES – CONT’D • Beam-to-column connections: – Simple – Semi-rigid (PR) – Moment connections (FR)
• Two-dimensional • Three-dimensional • Analysis and full-scale tests
Joints with Unequal Beam Depth
Conventional and Extended Single Plate Shear Tabs
The Infamous k-Area
k-region (area) has higher strength and hardness, as well as lower ductility and fracture toughness
A ROBUST CONNECTION
Fractured k-area showing arrest marks on the fractured surfaces
ADDITIONAL k-AREA COMMENTS • k-area extends about 1 inch (25 mm) into the web, beyond the k-distance • Do not place any welds into the k-area • Chamfer stiffeners (continuity plates), to avoid welds and especially weld ends in the k-area • Do not place doubler plates with longitudinal welds into the k-area (and as a general rule, if at all possible, avoid doublers all together)
SOME OTHER CONNECTIONS
Solutions for Connections to Concrete-Filled Tubes (CFT)
Beam-to-Column Connection with Shape Memory Alloy and Post-Tension Rods
AISI Seismic Moment Connection with Cold-Formed Channel Beams
Where Are We Headed? With constantly evolving framing systems, novel materials and fastening procedures, refined analytical and testing tools, improved knowledge of loads and other structural actions, etc. – there is no limit to the types of connections – and research must continue
FRAMING SYSTEMS • • • • • • •
Gravity and lateral loads Stability Energy absorption Resistance to extreme events Redundancy Robust details and systems Structural integrity
MOMENT-RESISTING FRAMING SYSTEMS
An Old Favorite: The T-Stub Connection
Original Pre-Northridge Connection
Improved Pre-Northridge Connection
Other Post-Northridge Connections
RBS (dog bone) Connection
Side-Plate Connection
Frames with RBS Connections
Frame with Side-Plate Connections
VARIOUS FORMS OF BRACED FRAMES FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE
ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES
Bolted Eccentrically Braced Frame Connections
CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES
Typical Concentrically Braced Bay
Close-up of Bracing Connection
Bracing system fuse
View from below
View from above
STRUCTURAL FUSES Fuses are now used in various forms of structures. They are specifically used to ensure that yielding will occur in designated members and locations, providing ductility and energy absorption while preventing nonductile failures in other elements and areas
Typical Buckling-Restrained Brace
Some Typical BRB End Details
Large-Scale Braced Frame Tests
NOVEL DEVELOPMENTS FOR BRACING CONNECTIONS AND GUSSET PLATES
Thornton Brace Connection to Minimize Distortion Forces
Thornton Brace Connection to Control Distortion Forces
Thornton High Seismic Brace Connection
SPECIAL PLATE SHEAR WALLS (SPSW) (previously called steel plate shear walls)
Federal Court House in Seattle
Steel-Plate Shear Wall in Low-Yield Steel Fy = 130 to 165 MPa (1,326 to 1,683 kg/cm2)
Where Are We Headed? • Three-dimensional inelastic frame analysis will be the norm • Framing systems and their details must be robust, in all respects • Seismic-type detailing will become the norm for most structures • Checks for structural integrity will be the norm
ROBUST STRUCTURES EXTREME EVENTS
TEST FOR ROBUSTNESS
Blast test of steel elements and connection verified very high and ductile energy absorption and close agreement with analysis
ROBUST CONNECTION UNDER FIRE CONDITIONS
FULL-SCALE FIRE TEST
SOME OTHER SUBJECTS
BRIDGE STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS
Viaduc de Millau
Sutong Bridge
NOVEL COMPOSITE JOINING TECHNIQUES
NEW STRUCTURES AND INDUSTRIES
BIM Building Information Modeling
Another BIM for Nationals Stadium
Actual Structure from BIM
BIM for Entire Nationals Stadium
CONCLUSIONS • Structural steel is alive and very strong, world-wide • Most projects are truly forwardlooking, offering significant new knowledge and practical applications • Leading efforts focus on the complete structure under realistic service and ultimate conditions
CONCLUSIONS – CONT’D • Full-scale testing continues to be done, but in limited fashion due to cost considerations • Analytical techniques are highly advanced and accurate • Many connection projects, including high strength steel • Many composite construction projects
CONCLUSIONS – CONT’D • Many projects addressing robust structures, structural integrity and disproportionate collapse • Many research efforts aim to develop practical code criteria • Numerous studies focus on novel connections and framing systems • Performance-based codes may evolve over the next decade
MANY THANKS! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Gracias Danke Takk Þakka þér fyrir Qujanaq Dank U Dankie Obrigado Efkaristo Děkuji Dziękuję Köszönöm Mulţumesc Eskerrik asko Hvala lepo Faleminderit Tešekürler Tashakor Shukran
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Merci Grazie Tack Kiitos Tänan väga Spasibo Arigato Mahalo Xie xie Dortse Tou che chi Kamsahamnide Khopkun Terima kasih Salamat po Asante Ndiyabulela Ameseginalehu Yekenyeley