The Redevelopment of Känta-Häme Rural Areas. Reimagining the users of the abandoned buildings.

The Redevelopment of Kanta-Häme Rural Areas — Reimagining the Uses of Abandoned Buildings GROUP 8 - ERONEN, HORN, LANKINEN, SITRAKOVA, SUVOROVA

1

PROJECT BOOK GROUP 8

ERONEN, HORN, LANKINEN, SITRAKOVA, SUVOROVA

1

ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS

1.1

Identifying regional phenomena 3

1.3

Strategic questions 9

1.2

2

Synthesis of the analysis 8

REGIONAL STRATEGY

2.1

Introduction to the strategy 13

Implementation: actors, networks and timeline

2.2

3

2.3

2.4

Scenarios and foresight 15 Future vision and spatialization of the strategy

15 21

REFERENCES

3.1

3.2

Bibliograpfy 24

Image sources 24 2

1. Analysis and synthesis 1.1

Identifying regional phenomena

The Kanta-Häme region has a rich historical and industrial background, as well as a variety of natural locations of interest and a beautiful nature. It is located between Finland’s three largest and fastest-growing regions, Helsinki, Tampere and Turku, and it is now experiencing population loss due to migration to other areas.

According to the analytical part of our project, we found some spatial patterns and statistical data where we can clearly see the phenomenon of the degrowth of the Kanta-Häme region in the future in 2040, since it is situated between the three largest and fastestgrowing regions of the whole of Finland (figure1).

Figure2. Chart of population share.

In Figure 2, we can observe the statistic of internal net migration by language in 2020, where we can see the trend of the three most developed regions having more people migrating into. Kanta-Häme is on 4th place, and in comparison, to the three most developed regions, it does not have a large migration net.

Figure1. The proportional population growth of Finnish regions (NUTS3) 20192040. Source: Statistics Finland, population projection 2019

Figure3. Map of city population growth.

3

Furthermore, we noticed a pattern in which the region’s most developing cities, such as Hämeenlinna and Riihimäki, which are located on major railways and roads, have a growth in population and will continue to grow in the future. We compared municipalities in the region to see the big picture. We identified a trend of migration to the region’s most developed cities, such as Hämeenlinna, Riihimäki and Forssa, which resulted in reduction in each municipality’s other minor cities.We decided to have a look at the municipals internal net migration. In Figure 3, we can observe how that works between inside the municipalities and the region itself. We can see that the single municipality with the largest population growth is the Hämeenlinna municipality.

There is also a scheme of how the railways are placed and the destinations of those railways.

Figure2. Internal net migration of regions by language in 2020. Statistics Finland.

The 4th figure illustrates the percentage of the urbanized territories across the region, so we can assume that people migrate to the big cities and leave the rural areas. So we decided to watch the biggest cities in the municipalities, and we found out that two of the biggest cities in the whole region increased in population during the last decades. (Figure5)

Figure5. Map of city population growth.

Figure6. Employed persons aged 18 to 64 in industries with the highest and lowest pay levels per 1,000 persons of the same age by region in 2019 Figure4. Percentage of the urbanized territories across the region.

4

While we were exploring the territory, we noticed that there were a lot of industrial buildings across the territory. On map 1, we can see the buffer zones of the industrial and public/business buildings across the territory, so we could observe how buildings are spread around and we noticed the pattern of how differently those industrial buildings are situated, but they mostly have good accessibility as they stick to the main roads and railroads mainly.

Then we put the workplaces on the buffers to see where there are workplaces nearby or in those buildings (Map2), so we can see that there are industrial buildings that are still in operation, as well as those that have significantly fewer workplaces or even don’t have any.

On Map3, where there is a population, we can see how the population is spread across the region and, of course, there are more people in the bigger cities, which are situated mostly across the railways and main roads. But we can see that there are people across the whole region, except for the central part.

MAP 2. Industrial buildings buffer with the workplaces of Kanta-Häme region.

The next step in the investigation was to determine the causes of shrinkage. So, we evaluated the reasons for this phenomenon, and we discovered that most people move to different regions in order to have more job opportunities, more local facilities, and in some places, there is a bad connection and a lack of facilities, as well as lack of entertainment venues, which may be the reason why people choose to move to larger cities in search for better possibilities, job opportunities and variety of hobbies and services.

When looking at the region as a whole, the most valuable employment and opportunities are concentrated in the country’s largest regions(Figure5), this pattern allows us to examine those trends and see the chances for resolving those challenges in 2050.

MAP 3. Population map of Kanta-Häme region.

MAP 1. Industrial buildings buffer and the public/business buildings buffer in Kanta-Häme region.

5

6

7

1.2 Synthesis of the analysis As a result of our research we can see some spatial phenomenon Region is loosing the population. We saw the phenomenon of the shrinkage in the region itself and we think that the major problem is the workplaces and job possibilities and facilities nearby.

People are moving to the urban areas. It is clearly seen that people inside the region are moving to the urban areas generally.

People are probably going to the more developed territory in order to have more work possibilities and facilities nearby. We identify that the reason of shrinkage could be in the having job opportunities.

The region is rich with the industrial buildings and there are some abandoned buildings across the Kanta-Häme. We found out that the region is rich with the industrial buildings and they could be the way to solve the problem of migration.

When we focused on the issue of shrinkage, we realized that there are old abandoned buildings across the region that might be one of the solutions to tackle the problem of shrinkage. On the one hand, the buildings have a great possibility to become places of identity for the location and people’s attraction on the other. We conducted research in order to discover those locations and evaluate each location based on certain criteria and as a potential location of interest. We began to consider how to draw new people to the region, how to make it special, and how to entice people to stay not just in the region’s major cities, but also in rural regions, which suffer more and more because of different types of ‘tunnel effects’ caused by the highly intensive transportation system between the most developed cities. According to the maps, there are less opportunities and services in small cities and towns nowadays. So we began to consider that we needed to use diverse methods for different areas and take a different strategy to each site rather than focusing on a single spot.

8

1.3 Strategic questions CLOTHING STORES

How to get young people stay, return or move into Kanta-Häme municipalities?

RESTAURANT

& CAFE

WORKPLACES

GROCERY STORES

BUS

What is the problem of the area? Why are they moving away? How to change conditions and attract them back?

The biggest cities of Kanta-Häme -- Hämeenlinna, Riihimäki and Forssa -- are perfectly situated in the middle of the triangle formed between the largest urban settlements in Finland (Helsinki, Tampere, Turku) and have comfortable transitions and accessibility. It is a common phenomena that people move to bigger cities in search of better opportunities for work, education and lifestyle. Kanta-Häme region also faces the problem of population decline across its small municipalities.

As a result, it causes a lack of working-age residents, economic and local institutions’ issues, and others. Our concept came up with the ways and approaches how to refresh those small municipalities and their small towns, attract people and provide even development for the country.

What to improve in small towns: Add more recreational function Create new workplaces Create opportunities for freelance/remote work Promote contact with nature, more hedonistic lifestyle and mental stability

BASIC CLOTHING STORES SERVICES RESTAURANT

& CAFE HARDWARE STORES ERIKOISLIIKKEET

KANTA-HÄME WORKPLACES

GROCERY STORES

TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS

HOW I CAN STAY?

BUS CAR

BASIC SERVICES

HARDWARE STORES

OTHER MEETING ERIKOISPLACES LIIKKEET

SOCIAL ACTIVITIES

EVENTS

TRAIN

RIDESHARING

KANTA-HÄME HOW I CAN STAY?

TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS

CAR

HOBBIES

RIDESHARING

Add eco-tourism and rental housing for working people Relocate possible companies’ offices to small towns Show possibilities and inspire new businesses to work from the countryside

How to improve: One way to change the situation and fulfill almost every point mentioned above is to rethink abandoned buildings and make multifunctional centers from them. It can be non-used industrial or office buildings of the region that we can improve by creating new functions and opportunities there.

TRAIN

SOCIAL ACTIVITIES

OTHER MEETING PLACES EVENTS

HOBBIES

Illustration of mindmap.

9

TURENKI, The sugar factory was built in 1946-1947. Architect was Jalmari Peltonen and contructor engineer Toi o R. h kallio. Two e#!ansions was com!leted in 19 and 196 .

Rauhaniemen brick factory Tiilitie 2, 12380 Janakkala

HÄMEENLINNA, The finnish fur factory.

df`eba_][_Z[f`cf`eba_]eY[ZW]cba_][Vae[f`ZW]cba_]eYa\eba_][ _Z[]_]UW^`T[a]TW^bfaeY[XWaYTa]S^ M;RORD Q P * (& & & !& ** * G Q *& !& (&!- * @ Q 8 * & !& ,- * & * *- & - *@ Q 3 * & ,& & * # 0& !&$ ,- * & - , ( & 0 & ,&. & * *0& 0 & & & ** *&* & , * !0& , ,&$ ,- * & - , ( ,& & ( ( *& - , ( &* *& & * *0&! & &* &%

Sotka woodworking factory and sawmill was established in Hämeenlinna 1942. Main products were sawn timber and windows. The power plant and the service house left without use.

Metsäliitto: A group of businessmen established the thread roll factory in Hämeenlinna in 1911. In 1930 the Sillander's brothers established the plywood factory in the building. In 1952 Metsäliitto (Forest cooperative) bought the whole factory and it started large renovation and expanding projekt.

"Vaaran furniture factory" in Hausjärvi

Vintage 2015: Oy Ferraria AB, Power station

Jokioisten lankatehdas

Map of work intensity and potential industrial buildings.

Examples of industrial buildings in Kanta-Häme.

10

Mindmap of implementation.

IIllustration of industrial buildings with different statuses.

11

References: Jiuli Workspace Creative Industry Center • OFFICE BUILDINGS • SHANGHAI, CHINA • Architectc Architectural Design Studio

Red Plum Culture and Creative Park • CULTURAL CENTER • SHENYANG SHI, CHINA • AAarchitects, IIA Atelier

Drangar Renovation • TOURISM, RENOVATION • ICELAND • Studio Granda

Renovation and Eºtension of ArcelorMittal³s • OFFICE BUILDINGS • AVILES, SPAIN • Çbaraga¹o¥

Mason Bros Warehouse Renovation • OFFICES, ADAPTIVE REUSE, SUSTAINABILITY • AUCðLAND, NEW ZEALAND • Warren and Mahoney

Silo Erlenmatt Renovation • OFFICE BUILDING S • BASEL, SWITZERLAND • Harry Gugger Studio

Urban Renovation of Tianjin Tractor Factory • RENOVATION, COMMERCIAL ARCHITECTUR E • TIANJIN, CHINA • Archiland

La Poste du Louvre Renovation • MIXED USE ARCHITECTURE, MUSEUM, CULTURAL CENTER • PARIS, FRANCE • Domini9ue Perrault Architecte

Bookstore Renovation • MOSCOW, RUSSIA • Architectural buro A2M

12

2. Regional strategy 2.1 Introduction to the strategy More and more industry buildings will lose their relevance and will change the production processes due to the sustainability trend. As a result, more abandoned industrial buildings will appear in the next 30 years. Moreover, some of them remain architectural heritage that should be preserved.

The abandoned and potentially non-used buildings keep an interesting architecture and free earth resources, have opportunities for region development and a great potential inside for new functions. That is why reimagining the uses of abandoned buildings is one of the efficient ways for countryside regions to develop and improve, making more people to stay.

13

WhY to work with industrial buildings

Many have iconic architectural features such as bricX eUteriors, large glass windows and eUposed duct worX

Often locate on prime sites near bodies of water and railroads for easy transportation of products

Used to be drivers for a town and its economy, as a result, have potential for new boost

Have opportunities for region development and a great potential inside for new functions

What to improve in small towns to return people back in into Kanta-Häme municipalities from big cities

Add more recreational function

Create new and modern workplaces

Provide opportunities for freelance/ remote work

“Promote” contact with nature

SWOT - analysis. of the region.

Add ecoktourism and rental housing for working people

Relocate possible companiesw o}ces to small towns

Show possibilities and inspire new businesses to work from the countryside

“Promote” more hedonistic lifestyle and mental stability

14

2.2 Scenarios and foresight In our strategy we look on to the small villages and towns of Kanta-Häme.

We recognize that they are in very different positions and that they have different scenarios and therefore they need different solutions.

The following scenarios are created to adjust our concept not for just one but multiple locations. Also, the connections, networks and number of workplaces varies over time so the scenarios will provide appropriate approach for each location’s current situation. We think that when it comes to the attractiveness of the area the accessibility and workplaces are in the biggest part. In our scenarios we have taken into consideration these two aspects and based on those we have divided the localities into four different scenarios.

In our scenario 1 the town is already in what we might consider as good situation.

It is located well and has a good accessibility. There are workplaces and therefore citizens. These towns and villages are located close to main roads or railways so they have short and fast connections elsewhere. Because of the good location businesses are interested to stay there now and in the future. And in the future, it is attractive by its accessibility, for new businesses also. The accessibility enables the business and workplaces and that enables inhabitants. Also, the location and accessibility enable people to live in this town but maybe work somewhere near city.

In 2. scenario the town has a situation where it has quite bad location and therefore bad accessibility still there is workplaces and inhabitants have jobs. The business there is maybe something that can manage with little less accessibility and maybe relies on something else for example closeness to resources or space. The workplaces keep the town alive and, in the future, it is vital for this town to find those businesses that find the tow attractive.

In 3. scenario we look onto the town that have little harder situation. It is located well and has a good accessibility but there are very little workplaces, and it affects to the number of inhabitants negatively. People can’t stay because they have no work and therefore income. Even though the accessibility is good the businesses still don’t find the town attractive enough to come or stay there.

In 4. scenario the town is in very bad situation: the accessibility is bad, and the town has no workplaces. Because there are no workplaces people can’t stay. And because the location is bad it doesn’t allow to shuttle from this town to work somewhere else.

So the number of inhabitants in decreasing. The decreasing amount of inhabitants and the lack of business put the town in hard situation: Something should be done to attract people there but because of the situation the town has very little it can do.

2.3 Implementation: actors, networks and timeline

Illustration of the four scenarios.

For each scenario we have chosen an example location to which our strategy is applied. In this part we briefly introduce our strategy through the following examples, but without going too far into details. For more detailed plan we have chosen to present the scenario 3 in part 2.4. Future vision and spatialization of the strategy.

15

HATTULA

(HÄMEENLINNA)

JANAKKALA

TAMMELA

(FORSSA)

LOPPI (RIIHIMÄKI)

16

Scenario 1 Hattula is a good example of scenario 1 (good accessibility with workplaces). It is located close to Hämeenlinna and between roads 57 and highway E12, which leads to Tampere. Hattula has less than average percentage of unemployed people in Häme region (Häme Työllisyyskatsaus 2021). In this example the workplaces for Hattula residents locate also outside Hattula, for instance in Hämeenlinna. In this scenario we want to create the center as an option for working in Hämeenlinna. The location needs to be considered through connections and residential perspectives. The purpose of the new center in this case is to ease resident’s life by bringing workplaces closer to avoid the need of commuting. The new center is located so that residents have opportunity to work there instead of the closest city. Our strategy in this case would be to locate new center on the opposite side of Hattula, from which Hämeenlinna is located. This way the new center would possibly shorten the commute also from those coming even further.

Since the accessibility is already good, we think it’s not the first place to take an action.

Although, when locating the new center, it should maintain the areas good connections.

For instance, best location for the center would be close to the railway that leads to closest cities. In this example we are locating the new center in Moijala. Now there is a course center that is surrounded by agricultural and industrial buildings. Having existing functions benefit our strategy, but we also want to include new functions to the center.

Since there already are arranged courses, it would be fluent to include remote studying and remote working spaces there. There could also be different multifunctional spaces for multiple users for example auditorium or hall for events, restaurant and rooms for businesses to rent. Using the abandoned buildings surround the course center would not only make the area livelier and more attractive, but also help the course center itself to keep the courses ongoing or even get more students for the courses.

Aerial view of the area.

Accessibility of Hattula

Picture of the example industrial building.

17

Scenario 2 For scenario 2 (bad accessibility with workplaces) we have chosen Loppi. Loppi is located directly East from Riihimäki and South from Hämeenlinna. It is not close to any highways and there are no railway connections nearby. Based on statistics, Loppi has the lowest number (5,6%) of unemployed job seekers in whole Häme region. Also, the number of open job positions has increased 156% compared to last year (Häme Työllisyyskatsaus 2021). Since the connections and accessibility are bad in this scenario, we think it is necessary to locate the new center directly in the village. Locating the center in the village instead of just near it, allows it to focus directly on the needs of Loppi’s residents.

In this example the center would be targeted for residents that have remote working possibilities. Our strategy is to get people work “remotely” in this new center instead of their own home. So, the actual workplace could locate anywhere in Finland. This approach would decrease the use of cars for commuting and attract people who don’t necessarily want to live in the city but are doing so because that is where their offices are located. For this example we have chosen a building that locates approximately two kilometers South-East from the village. Currently there is an operating business of aluminium casting, but we see it being potentially abandoned in the future. Having these abandoned building taken into use is cost-effective since they do not need to be maintained as empty buildings. Also, it makes area less attractive if there is abandoned buildings. The new center for remote working would benefit best the people living close to it. Our second act for Loppi would be to improve accessibility near the village by making sure the roads are in good shape and wide enough for year-round commuting..

Aerial view of the area.

Accessibility of Loppi.

Picture of the area and the industrial building.

18

Scenario 3 We have chosen Janakkala as an example for our third scenario (good accessibility, no workplaces). Janakkala has a good location right next to the main railway and it is close to the highway that connects Helsinki and Tampere. Since the accessibility is already good like in the first scenario, we think it is not priority to act on that. We do want to take advantage of the existing railway connection by locating the new center next to it. Train connection could bring residents from areas along the railway, and it could be used for daily commuting. In this example we are using old brick factory that locates in Leppäkoski, Janakkala. The location is approximately nine kilometers South of Janakkala village. The factory is located well along the railway. Due to the factory’s good location, it could be used for multiple functions. First, we need to act on the workplace issue by creating remote offices for studying or working. There could also be other functions to increase attractiveness of the area. Such functions could be spaces for different kinds of spare time activities, restaurant, common sauna or grocery store. Later, some residential buildings would be added if wanted or needed.

We took this scenario into closer review and developed the idea further in part 2.4.

Accessibility of Janakkala.

Photo taken at the site, Lankinen, M.

Aerial view of the area.

Photo taken at the site, Lankinen, M.

Photo taken at the site, Lankinen, M.

19

Scenario 4 For the last scenario (bad accessibility, no workplaces) we have chosen a place in Tammela that locates approximately 9 kilometers East from the city of Forssa. For place like this, ideal would be to implement our strategy of the “center” in a smaller scale. We want to maintain areas peacefulness and by doing so, attract retired people and encourage people who have cottages to stay there permanently. As an example building, there currently is an isolated bakery that could potentially be used as functional center in the future. The example area is too close to the city to be considered as efficient remote-working center. So, in this kind of situation our strategy would be to include other functions there, such as combined rental living- and spare time activity center for retired people for example. Spare time activity center could be in common use with the villages surrounding. We want to improve the accessibility by upgrading roads maintaining the areas natural feeling and keeping it separated from urban environment.

Accessibility of Tammela.

Aerial view of the area.

Picture of the area and the industrial building.

20

2.4 Future vision and spatialization of the strategy In this part we look more deeply into the Scenario 3 (good accessibility and no workplaces) that was presented in 2.3 Implementation: actors, networks and timeline, where you can also find basics of the situation. We located the implementation into an old brick factory Rauhaniemi, located in Leppäkoski, Janakkala. As a tribute to the area’s history we named the new center according to the old factory.

In Rauhaniemi area we wanted to create a living environment which combines the most functional aspects of both the urban environment and

the countryside. The new area can also serve as a tourist destinations or venues that would increase the area’s attractiveness. We approached the design with variety of influencing factors.

Firstly, we noticed an opportunity to create new commuter train stop right next to the center. The train stop makes the center very easy to travel from and to bigger cities. Good public transport connections also entice users and residents who do not want to support private motoring.

Nowadays people are more interested in ecological solutions, and it is important to take a notice about the latest technologies and ecological solutions also in smaller cities. We need a flexible transformation environment using long-term

solutions for example material choices, newest technical creations and recycling. In Rauhaniemi area we want to use these ways of rebuilding and renovating the old factory area and its buildings.

Plan for land use in Janakkala.

Plan for land use and connections.

21

Communality One element we chose is communality. We want to create a living environment that attracts both other city residents and municipality’s own residents. The plan aims to combine the best features of urban and rural community. Like in countryside the help of neighbors is natural action, people know each other’s more often and it is good thing in everyday life. The new Rauhaniemi area brings together the residents of the Janakkala and the same time creates new opportunities to live in the countryside but work somewhere else simultaneously. New hubs create meeting places where you can easily come by bike, by foot, by train or by car to socialize with friends and meet new people. Services are close by and there are good opportunities to engage in culture.

Rauhaniemi is the place where people can organize bigger events which brings attention to the area, which invigorates the city, creates job opportunities and increases tourism.

Users Generally, among potential users of this multifunctional center are working-aged people looking for life balance and a variety of different opportunities simultaneously.

It is a place where they can perfectly combine remote/freelance work and a great network base with mental stability and contact with nature. One more strategy of the concept devotes to relocating companies’ offices to small towns and villages cause not all companies’ departments have to be in one location to proceed with their business. And the strategy also plans to show possibilities for new businesses and inspire them to work from the countryside if possible. Among ownership we plan to attract developers, companies and city organisations to invest in those places. Towns are supposed to invest into social-oriented places, developers can invest into living spaces and companies would become one of the main investors.

Lecture halls / auditorium

Company’s ofces (Rental workplaces)

New housing building Administrative ofces

New housing building Food court New housing building Greenhouse, museum, recreation

Technical premises

Club room, store

Sauna Sport, gym, hobby

Technical premises

Graph of area’s functions.

Nature connection Nature connections and biodiversity have decreased in big cities. The reduction of microbial exposure with urbanization is one major factor in the prevalence of several allergies, asthma and autoimmune diseases. Humans need repeated exposure to soil and other natural elements. In rural areas, like in Janakkala, nature occurs in its original form providing the necessary microbial and micro-organism growth. We take this into consideration by adding more natural microbial exposure in the city environment by increasing urban cultivation opportunities and preserving existing nature. In janakkala urban cultivation solutions could be allotments, vegetable patches and greenhouses. By these solutions we want to strengthen people’s nature connection and create a community.

All these measures will help attract young generations to the Kanta-Häme region and increase the population within its municipalities. As a result, it will help to solve economic and local institutions’ issues.

Outdoor vizualization of the plan.

22

Photo taken at the site, Lankinen, M.

Indoor vizualization of the plan.

Photo taken at the site, Lankinen, M.

Photo taken at the site, Lankinen, M.

23

3. References 3.1 Bibliography Stiglitz M.S. Industrial Architecture in the Field of ”Industrial Archeology”. St. Petersburg: White and Black, 2003.

Shagin, A.L. Reconstruction of Buildings and Structures / A.L. Shagin, Yu.V. Bondarenko, D.F. https://vaxer.stockholm/globalassets/omraden/-stadsutvecklingsomraden/ ostermalm-norra-djurgardsstaden/royal-seaport/media/sustainable_urbandevelopment-programme.pdf

3.2 Image sources https://www.archdaily.com/970402/endless-bookstore-architectural-bureau-a2m?ad_ source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab https://www.archdaily.com/960089/la-poste-du-louvre-renovation-dominiqueperrault-architecte?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab https://www.archdaily.com/967805/jiuli-workspace-creative-industry-center-architectplus-architectural-design-studio?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab https://www.archdaily.com/967099/red-plum-culture-and-creative-park-aaarchitectsplus-iia-atelier?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab

https://www.archdaily.com/941786/silo-erlenmatt-renovation-harry-guggerstudio?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab https://www.archdaily.com/940352/urban-renovation-of-tianjin-tractor-factoryarchiland?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab https://www.archdaily.com/926383/mason-bros-warehouse-renovation-warren-andmahoney-architects?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab Figure1 The proportional population growth of Finnish regions (NUTS3) 2019-2040.

Source: Statistics Finland, population projection 2019 Figure2 Internal net migration of regions by language in 2020. Statistics Finland. https://www.stat.fi/til/muutl/2020/muutl_2020_2021-05-12_tie_001_en.html Figure3 Map of city population growth. source: https://www.citypopulation.de/en/ finland/admin/05__kanta_h%C3%A4me/ Figure4 Percentage of the urbanized territories across the region. Source: https:// www.citypopulation.de/en/finland/admin/05__kanta_h%C3%A4me/ Figure5 Map of city population growth. source: https://www.citypopulation.de/en/ finland/admin/05__kanta_h%C3%A4me Figure6 Employed persons aged 18 to 64 in industries with the highest and lowest pay levels per 1,000 persons of the same age by region in 2019 https://www.stat.fi/til/ tyokay/2019/03/tyokay_2019_03_2021-10-21_tie_001_en.html

https://www.archdaily.com/925031/drangar-renovation-studio-granda?ad_ source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab https://www.archdaily.com/301608/renovation-and-extension-of-arcelormittalsbaragano?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab https://www.archdaily.com/941786/silo-erlenmatt-renovation-harry-guggerstudio?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab

24