The Psychology Of Takeover. 18 Strategies Maori activists are using to try & take over New Zealand by Oke Bay Publishing

The Psychology of Takeover 18 strategies Maori activists are using to try and take over New Zealand

This document is a draft. It will become a booklet to be distributed all around New Zealand in letter boxes. If you have comments or suggestions about this booklet, please do so by emailing Julian@stopcogov.kiwi There are pictures to illustrate the text all through. make proof reading easy, they have been stripped out so just imagine they are By To Julian Batchelor 1 there for now. Thanks

Reviews (coming)

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

The Psychology Of Takeover You have been given or emailed this booklet because we want you to join in the fight for democracy and equality in New Zealand.

We are also fighting for:

• One person, one vote. All votes have equal value. • One law for all. One Flag. • The belief that all ethnic groups are of equal value and should have equal rights. • The belief that English must be preserved as our main language. • David Seymour's Treaty Referendum. • The repeal of all race based legislation. • We are fighting for the average Maori & all the other 159 cultures in NZ

We are fighting against:

• Special favours / handouts for one racial group only - Maori. • Separate Health, Justice, and Education systems for Maori. • A country name change from New Zealand to Aotearoa. • The forcing of Te Reo. • We are fighting against private tribal companies / tribal representatives and their bid to take over NZ, now well underway. • The idea that New Zealand is made up of only two groups: Maori and “the rest.”

We are not two groups. We are all New Zealanders. All these issues come under the umbrella of ‘co-governance’, which must be decisively rejected. Co-governance is the most serious political issue New Zealand has ever faced.

www.stopcogovernance.co.nz

Short Video

Short on-line book

If allowed to continue, it threatens the future of New Zealand and will dramatically affect the type of country our children and grandchildren will inherit.

https://bit.ly/ stopcogov

https://bit.ly/3Xnd3Ni

To join the fight, visit Www.stopcogovernance.kiwi and sign up to receive daily blogs and updates. Thank you.

What it is, why it’s wrong, and why it must be stopped

The Psychology Of Takeover Preamble Firstly, this book might appear to have been written by a racist. It's direct, honest, and pulls no punches. The dictionary defines a racist like this: "a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race"1 In other words, someone who believes their race is inherently superior to all others. Hitler was like that. I don't know anyone in New Zealand like that. Nothing in this book fits this definition. Secondly, every point made is backed up with examples. Nothing is simply opinion. It's therefore factual. It tells the truth. To access the examples, you have to click on the hyperlinks which are only found in the on-line version. To access the on line version, simply scan the QR code on the right. With these two points in mind, enjoy your reading. ---------------------------------Radical activist Maoris2 have got away with fraud, corruption, deceit and trickery with regard to the Treaty of Waitangi for over 45 years. Billions of dollars in cash, land, and assets have been given to Maoris, in many cases without justification. Who says that many of the payments/settlements were/are unjustified? Treaty commentator Mike Butler writes “Treaty settlements have rewritten history, the factual basis of which is open to serious challenge. Most grievances had been settled by 1960 on a full-and-final basis and that

1 Merriam Webster 2 When I talk about ‘Maori activists’ I also include in this group many woke liberals (of all cultural groups and nationalities) who have joined in with the Activist Maori cause. For many woke liberals, joining the activists' cause has morphed into a religious experience. Woke just means fully supportive of Maorification and the cause of the activists to take over New Zealand. Their conversations are peppered with Maori words, virtue signalling, and they often wear some kind of bone carving around their neck, or have something similar dangling from their ears. They are easy to spot.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

should have been the end of the story.” 3

University Law lecturer David Round says "...the Treaty Industry is now a gigantic racket, which will continue for as long as gullible New Zealanders accept everything that every plausible rogue tells them. Continuing demands for Maori entitlement are nothing but the demands of con-men.” 4 If the vast majority of payouts to Maoris are not justified, why is the gigantic Treaty racket continuing? Why is 'full and final' never 'full and final'? Answer? Let me use an analogy. To build a house, a builder uses tools such as a hammer, a saw, nails, a tape measure, a level, and so on. To defraud the New Zealand public of assets and cash, and gain undemocratic control of organisations and entities, like local councils and Maori wards, weaselling their way in, Maori activists use tools too. Their tools are what I call 'corruption strategies'. Maori activists are using these strategies to take over New Zealand little by little. They are using them to dupe/con/fool New Zealanders. It's called Maorification creep or slow boiling the frogs. Who are the frogs? Us. All New Zealanders. The boiling frog is a metaphor describing a frog being slowly boiled alive. The premise is that if a frog is put suddenly into boiling water, it will jump out, but if the frog is put in tepid water which is then brought to a boil slowly, it will not perceive the danger and will be cooked to death ("death" is another metaphor for the end of democracy and the installation of full blown tribal rule). The story is often used to illustrate

the inability or unwillingness of people to react to or be aware of sinister threats that arise gradually rather than suddenly.

Some of the evidence that a slow cooking of the frogs is going on is obvious. For example, we have all witnessed MPs being duped into unjustifiably giving away billions of dollars in cash and assets to Maoris as well as the

undemocratic giving away of power in many spheres of New Zealand life to Maoris e.g. Maori wards and Maori only fishing areas. Three Waters

was really obvious. The forcing of Te Reo into every aspect of everyday life is also obvious. However, many other aspects of the slow boiling of the frogs are not so 3 Mike Butler “Twisting the Treaty; A Tribal Grab for Wealth and Power”,4th Ed., 2018, ISBN1872970338, p.173 4 David Round, ibid., pp.110,113,121

By Julian Batchelor

obvious. For a sample of what is going on in secret that you will probably not know about, click HERE The point is, whether obvious or not, a coup by stealth is in progress and many Kiwis are not aware that they are slowly being cooked. The coup is being hidden from them. How? Via the corruption strategies. Don’t believe me that radical Maoris are slowly taking over New Zealand? Read THIS if you want proof. More proof is HERE Maori activist Syd Jackson said, "This land belongs to the Maori people and we have the right to control it. We have never been conquered or ceded our sovereignty. The government is illegal and the power that it holds is illegal. New Zealand should revert to the situation that existed before the Treaty of Waitangi was signed in 1840. As the first people of the land, the Maori should take control of the government."5 It's pretty clear, isn't it.6 Maori activists want full control of New Zealand. In this booklet, I am going to name 18 corruption strategies, then show you what you can do to beat them i.e. how you can become a savvy, very aware frog, hop out of the cooking pot, and help others hop out. Let me explain. You will have heard Maori activists talk and write about things like: •

how Maoris own New Zealand, how they want it back,

•

how Maoris want to govern New Zealand and Maorify it,

•

how they are Treaty partners, how they did not cede sovereignty in the Treaty,

•

how they are indigenous and thus deserve special rights,

•

how they demand their own government,

•

how colonisation has ruined Maoris,

•

how they want what they call 'tino rangatiratanga' over their land and destiny

All these ideas, and more, come under the umbrella of one well known word: co-governance.

Herein lies the problem. Co-governance is based entirely on a fraudulent interpretation of the Treaty7. There is nothing about co-governance or 5 Stuart C. Scott. The Travesty of Waitangi. Towards Anarchy. Caxton Press, 1995. p. 65 7 By "Treaty" we mean the Treaty in Maori. This is the one signed by over 500 chiefs in 1840.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

partnership in the Treaty. This is just a fact. Read the Treaty in English

HERE. Make up your own mind. In the Treaty, by ceding sovereignty (Article 1), Maoris signed up to be treated as equals with all the other people living in New Zealand (Article 3), forever. There is no mandate in the Treaty for Maoris to be treated with special privilege or entitlement. This too is just a fact. As such, the modern day concept of co-governance is a Mt Everest size lie, and an equally large breach of the Treaty. Why should we be concerned about knowing these strategies? Sun Tzu (left), a Chinese military general, strategist, and philosopher, once said “Know

thy enemy and know yourself; in a hundred battles, you will never be defeated.”

I would never say that all Maoris are 'the enemy', because they are not. Many are our supporters. But I would say that activist Maoris are our enemy. Anyone who wants to destroy New Zealand via treason, deceit, and dishonesty is an enemy. Watch THIS If we want to stop the co-governance racket, this treason, finally put an end to it, derail the gravy train, restore democracy and equality, get back to the original intent and meaning of the Treaty in Maori, Te Tiriti, we need to know the corruption strategies used by Maori activists well so that we can effectively counter them. We want to haul as many frogs as possible out of the boiling pot. Many non-activist Maoris, our friends, want this information too. They too detest what the Maori activists are doing and saying. They are embarrassed about what they are up to, giving Maoris a bad name. So what are these strategies? As I said, there are 18 of them, and they are all rooted in psychology. Which means what? They target our thinking and mess with our minds. Often they overlap. For example, spreading treaty misinformation involves lying and deceitfulness. Likewise frightening people is highly manipulative behaviour. Bear with me. Here they are: 1. Spreading Treaty of Waitangi misinformation 2. Verbal abuse 3. Frightening people: bullying, intimidation, threats. 4. Shaming people, making them feel guilty, so that they have to say ‘sorry’ over and over By Julian Batchelor

5. Eggshell mentality - trumping up 'offences' 6. Lying and deceitfulness 7. Camel in the tent 8. Heavy manipulation 9. Playing the victim card 10. Grooming or ‘cultural re-programming’ 11. Talking over the top of people 12. Media collaboration 13. The Maorification of local councils 14. Radicalisation 15. Creating confusion 16. Making emotionally charged statements with no proof of their veracity 17. Maoris demanding the sole right to interpret the Treaty. 18. Playing down true intentions + deflection.

SPREADING TREATY OF WAITANGI MISINFORMATION.

The population of New Zealand, generally speaking, do not know the truth about the Treaty, even people in high places. For example, when Jacinda Ardern was asked by a reporter what the first and second Articles of the Treaty were, she did not know. You can watch the video HERE. She was too lazy to study the Treaty. But laziness is not the only problem. When most people study 'the Treaty', they don't realise that what they are studying is produced by activists and therefore the commentary is deliberately misleading. e.g. THIS. Maori activists, via a corrupt and collaborative media, and many other ‘official government communications’ like Te Papa in Wellington, so called 'Maori academics', and the Waitangi Tribunal, have for decades been busy pumping out flagrant untruths about the Treaty and our history to Kiwis. Young people, particularly, have been targeted. Through our education system, our young people are drip fed misinformation about the Treaty, starting in kindergarten and extending through to the end of University. They don’t stand a chance of NOT being brainwashed. Really, it's child abuse. Why child abuse? It's shameful for children to be used as political pawns. They ought to be allowed to grow up with their innocence preserved and 8

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

protected for as long as possible. But they are not viewed this way by activists. They are viewed by activists as the next wave of potential voters i.e. activists figure that if they can capture the minds of the young voters, they can legally capture the country. It’s a very cunning and clever plan and it’s working, which makes it also despicable. It’s crucial that the new Minister of Education, Erica Stanford, is aware of this so that she can quickly detox a very toxic education system. She must, and very decisively, disassemble this cornerstone Strategy of the Maori activists. Her email is Erica.Stanford@parliament.govt.nz Write to her.

With Treaty misinformation, activists say things like “the crown needs to honour Te Tiriti” or “this was promised us through the Treaty” or “the crown needs to honour its commitment to Maoris via the Treaty” or “Maoris and the Crown are partners through the Treaty” or “Maoris didn’t cede sovereignty in the Treaty” or “Through the Treaty we have a right to tino rangatiratanga or self-determination” or "We were promised a Te Tiriti centric Aotearoa" and so on. The variations on these themes are endless. These statements are, of course, misinformation. Innocent Kiwis who hear these statements, the frogs in the pot, who don’t know any better, simply fall into line saying to themselves things like “Oh, well, they must know best, so we need to honour our commitment to Maoris via the Treaty.” Once you start saying things like this, believing the misinformation, you put yourself under the control of Maori activists, which is where they want you. Watch THIS video. About 1 minute into the video, the Maori lady speaking says "We (i.e. Maoris) should be in control of how we (i.e. Maoris) want it (i.e. the Treaty) to work." In other words, they want to be the sole arbiters of interpreting what the Treaty means and says. They want to always be in control. This is why they hate David Seymour so much. He is now in control. ANTIDOTE TO TREATY MISINFORMATION?

Education. Education. Education. We can and must counter Treaty misinformation with education. Education is the key to countering these ‘corruption strategies’. For example, what I have written in this booklet is ‘education’. How so? By Julian Batchelor

Those who read it find out how activist Maoris are taking over the country, the strategies they employ to do it. If readers of this booklet get to know these strategies, they can counter them. What then? They can play their part in stopping the coup. How? By speaking up, voicing their abhorrence, joining in with the Stop Co-Governance cause, helping to finance it, forcing a referendum, raising awareness among their friends and family, etc. Similarly, the population of New Zealand will not be able to detect misinformation about the Treaty and our history - all the deceit, lies, and trickery - if they do not know the truth about the Treaty and our history. One can't reject what one cannot detect. Think about that. It makes sense.

Truth, you see, is hugely, hugely important. In fact, it’s everything. It’s like this - if you fed someone only ice cream and lollies for six months, they would soon become sick. Being very sick, they would be vulnerable to every kind of disease / illness. It’s the same with the people of New Zealand. They have been fed a diet of Treaty misinformation (ice cream) and lies (lollies) for 45 years or so. The temperature of the water in the pot has been slowly warming over this time. The result? They have become Treaty weak and Treaty sick, like sick sheep. Once the public, MPs, and bureaucrats become Treaty sick, they easily fall prey to serious diseases like being shafted / robbed / duped, especially via the Mainstream Media. Worst of all, they give up fighting. They lie down, and just give in to the disease that has beset them. They become frogs in the

slow boiling pot, just accepting their new life, feeling powerless to change their circumstances.

And then? Radical Activists can then push on with the agenda to take over the country, unopposed. This is exactly what has happened in our country over the past 45 years or so. If we’d been vigorous healthy sheep, metaphorically speaking, what would our response have been? Vigorous pushback. We should have been full of fight, but we have not been. What should we have done? Stop donating to charities which support Maorification. Read HERE for more on this. What else? Protest marches, referenda, the publication of brochures and flyers delivered to letter boxes. Massive mobilisation of the population to say “No!” Instead of 1000 people turning out to march in protest, as was the case in 2023, we’d have 200,000 in 2026. 10

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

It can’t be just a few people. It has to be masses of people This is the way to effect real and lasting change and stop misinformation and lies. MPs only take notice of big shows of strength. Why? Because large numbers of people represent large numbers of votes. And large numbers of votes can swing elections. We have to speak the language of MPs. Effectively, the Stop Co-Governance movement was able to hugely influence the outcome of the 2023 election by printing and distributing 550,000 of our Stop Co-Governance booklets prior to the election. We educated the public about co-governance and it worked. Look at Seymour and Peters. They are the product of Treaty Truth Education. Just look at the fight they have in them to stop the corruption. They were / are incredible. Imagine if we had 120 of them in the Beehive? Imagine if you were like them? You can be. You can read the booklet we distributed HERE

This is why we have to give ourselves 100% to Treaty Education in the next 3 years. Education is powerful. It changes things. It can shift the political landscape. Think about it. The pen, truly, is mightier than the sword. Maori activists have, for the last 45 years or so, been keeping the public in the dark about what the Treaty really is and what it really says. The only way to counter this is with Treaty truth. Light always overcomes darkness. This is one reason why activists are so against David Seymour’s proposed referendum on the Treaty. At all costs, radical Maoris don’t want the truth about the Treaty and our history to get out. It would mean the end of the gravy train and the full restoration of democracy. This is why David Seymour and Winston Peters must be supported like there is no tomorrow. We can best do this by bringing the truth about the Treaty and our history to the New Zealand public. What would it look like if Maoris were in control of our country? Answer? In no time, NZ would become the Zimbabwe of the South Pacific.

Here are some highly likely outcomes: •

Tribal tolls for boats out on the water. Maori only fishing areas. Fines.

•

Tribal tolls for cars moving between tribal areas.

•

Tribal tolls to use beaches. Fines for infringements.

•

Tribal tolls to use ex-DOC land and National parks.

•

Land grabbing. Farms and private freehold property being ‘reclassified’ as Wahi Tapu (i.e. sacred Maori land) with no recourse for redress or appeal.

•

Tribal road blocks, with iwi handing out infringement notices.

By Julian Batchelor

•

The replacement of European town / city / landmark names with Maori names. Changing our country’s name to Aotearoa. Road signs in Maori.

•

An exodus of good people leaving New Zealand.

•

With fewer people living in New Zealand, the tax take will be down, so to pay the bills, taxes and rates will increase for those left in the country.

•

With a decline in the tax take, there will be less money for infrastructure maintenance and improvement. Superannuation funds will collapse.

•

With a decline in the tax take, social services like hospitals, schools, and the police will decline, causing our country to plummet to third world status.

•

An increase in corruption in government departments. Reports show that wherever the so called indigenous people have taken control of a country, this is one of the outcomes which follow. Renowned philosophers / thinkers say separation (i.e. self determination and sovereignty for Maoris), will result in disaster for Maoris and only assimilation will work i.e. Maoris joining the modern world and being Westernised, while at the same time being free and encouraged to retain and grow their language and culture. This is hugely important, not just for Maoris, but for all cultural groups living in New Zealand.

•

Tourists will choose not to come to New Zealand because of our “Zimbabwe Of The South Pacific” reputation. So the tourist industry will collapse.

•

Development costs will skyrocket, since tribal involvement adds another layer of bureaucracy. Developers will pass these costs on to end users.

•

A water meter on every dwelling in NZ with 50 percent of water charges going to private tribal companies.

•

Special preference given to Maoris in employment situations.

•

An end to free speech. Punishment (e.g. fines or imprisonment) for people who speak out against tribal rule. Intense Maorification of

society.

•

Radicalisation of young Maori people. Aggressive behaviour toward others.

•

Bullying behaviour, typical of Maori land occupations, will increase as will noisy marches and rude interruptions to meetings.

•

Fighting between tribes as they jostle for dominance.

•

Maoris corruptly screwing other businesses over. HERE is a prime

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

example •

The emergence of authoritarian Maori dictatorship where subservience and submission is demanded, including from Maoris of the non-dominant tribes.

To stop all this, we have to bring Treaty truth to the public. We have 3 years. Why three years? Our political situation increases the urgency to educate the public about the Treaty. Meaning what?

Luxon is a huge worry because he is going to keep co-governance going. He’s said so. He is a frog in the pot, only he doesn't know it. For more details, click HERE His deputy has capitulated already. Click HERE Luxon has appointed a Minister of Maori Development who is an out and out activist. His name? Tama Potaka. Proof? Read THIS Why would Luxon put Potaka in such a strategic and powerful position if he was not himself an activist, albeit a closet variety? It's a good question. Remember how Kiwis in great numbers voted Ardern into power in 2020? And now, in retrospect, this was a terrible error of judgement? Many Kiwis are living with huge regrets about voting for her in 2017 and 2020. In three years from now, Luxon will be viewed in the same light if he does not EXPUNGE co-governance during his first term. Activist Maoris are already mobilising, urging more frogs to jump in to the pot, pleading with those already in it, not to get out. Luxon is about to be tested. His feet are about to be held to the fire. Will he willingly and knowingly stay in the pot, or will he jump out? If Luxon does not expunge co-governance completely, what then? There is a good chance that at the next election, 2026, which is not far away, Te Pati Maori, The Greens, and Labour will be back in power. Remember, they collectively received 40% of the vote in the 2023 election, almost enough to form a government. It's truly a terrifying thought that three of the worst Parties on the planet (i.e. Labour, Greens, and Te Pati Maori) received as many votes as they did. This tells me that there are a lot of people who have fallen prey to activist Treaty misinformation and the 18 corruption strategies. There are a lot of frogs still in the pot, slowly being boiled. But it gets worse. By Julian Batchelor

A new crop of brainwashed / heavily groomed young voters who were not eligible to vote in the 2023 election, will be eligible in the 2026 election. This group could help Labour and its friends to win the 2026 election. This ought to alarm us. Watch THIS video. Don’t forget too, a good number of elderly voters who voted in the 2023 election to stop co-governance and Maorification will have passed on. So really, a double blow for the Stop Co-Governance cause. What am I saying? I am saying that this last election was close. It was not a landslide victory for National/ Act / NZ First I am also saying that we are fools in the extreme if we put our feet up and think that with National in and Labour out, the problem of co-governance and the Activist Maori takeover of our country is no longer a threat. In my view, the threat level is rising and will continue to rise.

The reality is that Te Pati Maori, The Greens, and Labour will be back one day. This is certain. Definite. And when this happens, Maorification and CoGovernance will be back too, full force. What about NZ First and Act, and their influence? Good question. Seymour and Peters are absolute heroes.

Together these two have been able to significantly curb racism, Maorification, apartheid, and separatism. They have slowed the pace of the coup. We must applaud them for their stellar efforts. Truly, they have done so well. Incredibly, unbelievably, their only handbrake is Luxon.

Really it’s squarely Luxon’s fault that co-governance was not dealt a death blow in the coalition talks. Seymour and Peters wanted to, but not Luxon. He could have done it, but he didn’t. Peters and Seymour gave him the opportunity. Luxon did not take that opportunity. I want voters to remember this.

Why is expunging co-governance so important? Co-governance, you see, is like cancer. If you leave a bit of it in the body, it will come back with a vengeance and ravage that body. It will kill it. Likewise, co-governance will kill New Zealand if it’s not expunged. Luxon is not awake to the seriousness of this situation. He seems oblivious, blind to it. Conclusion? It's inexcusable that he does not understand the Treaty and thus does not understand this issue. This is a tragedy for a Prime 14

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

Minister in a time of national crisis. Let's believe / hope he will self correct during his first term under the tutelage of people like Peters, Seymour, Jones, and Costello. Treaty ignorance blinds people to the most dangerous and obvious-toothers political realities. Currently, Luxon is one of those blind people.

What I am saying is that the changes to co-governance and Maorification that ACTand NZ First are able to effect while they are in power will likely be quickly and easily reversed by Labour, The Greens, and Te Pati Maori when they taste election success again. And so a ridiculous and very costly / wasteful cycle of enact, repeal, enact, repeal idiocy will be set in motion. Do Kiwis want this? No. Enough of all this nonsense. Co-governance must be expunged (i.e. Completely eliminated). Erased. Constitutional change must be enacted to ensure that it never comes back.

To keep the cancer analogy going, New Zealand must go into co-governance remission. By this we mean, no trace of it is left. i.e. full cure.

What’s our message to all Kiwis? At the expense of repeating myself, I’ll say it again. Co-governance must be EXPUNGED. ERASED. We have a small window of opportunity. We have three years. This is not much time. It will pass quickly. In these three years, the Greens, Te Pati Maori and Labour will be re-grouping, getting ready for their next offensive, when they are back in power. Already we've seen them squealing like stuck pigs, protesting against the goals of the coalition government. Mark my words 2023-2026 will be remembered for Maori protests and activist squealing. And when they get back in power, their assault on democracy, stopping free speech, trashing the democratic principle that only people who are elected can stand for councils etc will be back too. They will be back promoting racism, apartheid, and inequality. Their vision of taking control of New Zealand will fire up again. Meanwhile, during 2023-26, the Waitangi Tribunal will grind on, through fraud and corruption, giving away billions of our taxes to equally corrupt and undeserving recipients. As I have said before, the Tribunal and how it works has also become one gigantic racket.

What can you do? By Julian Batchelor

Start a TEG (i.e. Treaty Education Group) in your town or suburb. It’s really a discussion group. We provide all the materials, coach you, show you how to do it. What do you learn at a TEG meeting? •

Mainly, you will learn about the Treaty. You’ll learn the truth about it, verified by reputable scholars

•

In no time, you’ll be able to explain the Treaty, in a simple and easy to understand way

•

You’ll also discuss and learn about the history of New Zealand leading up to the Treaty, and after the Treaty was signed

•

You’ll discuss issues and news related to co-governance, so that you are at all times fully informed and up to speed with ‘the latest’

•

You’ll also make friends with like minded people, which is powerful and rewarding

•

You’ll meet in someone’s home, or a community building

If you want to grow as a person, increase your skills, your usefulness to New Zealand and democracy, this is your chance. There is no better way to use your time. One more thing. TEGs are not just about being educated in a small group situation in someone’s home. No. They are also, importantly, about doing practical things like delivering flyers and brochures to letter boxes, putting up billboards, and inviting people to TEG meetings, growing them. We must support Seymour and Peters. We must lobby and bring Luxon into a place of a mindset change. Why do all this? Good question. Answer? If a referendum on the Treaty happens, or David Seymour's Treaty Bill is introduced, the New Zealand public will be asked to vote or make a submission. They must know the Treaty so that they can vote / make a submission intelligently. We cannot and must not be lulled into a place of complacency. Don’t wait until 6 months out from the next election to suddenly get going, which is the norm. Absolutely not. This would be the ultimate foolish thing to do. We have a ton of work to do, so we must start now to prepare people for the next election in 2026. We also want to support Peters and Seymour. This is going to be slow-going and hard, because the co-governance

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

propaganda has been so intense for so long. Detoxing takes time. There is no quick fix.

It’s also crucially important that all the great organisations / people who are fighting against co-governance and Maorification - people like John Porter, Democracy Action, Hobson’s Pledge, NZCPR, NZ Tax Payers' Union, Voices for Freedom , RCR Radio, Terry Opines, Bob Jones, Garrick Tremain, Sean Plunket's Platform, the Free Speech Union, Bruce Moon, Dr John Robinson, Mike Butler, Cameron Slater and the BFD, the Red Baiter, Whangarei Tim, Brad Mitchell, Waikanae Watch, Tony Fellingham, Cultural Dementia, Chris Trotter, Karl Du Fresne, Lee Williams and others - sing from the same song sheet. There is great power in unity.

What song sheet? The main song being that we all advertise and promote the Littlewood draft as the only bona fide final English draft of the Treaty AND that we return, rightly, to the Treaty in Maori, Te Tiriti AND that we get back to the right interpretation of key words / phrases like ‘tino rangatiratanga’ which is the Maori translation of the English word ‘possession’ in Article 2 of the Treaty. Other key words are 'kawanatanga' and 'taonga'. You can read the correct interpretation of ‘tino rangatiratanga’ HERE, 'Kawanatanga' HERE, and 'Taonga' HERE. The Littlewood draft was precisely translated into the Ngapuhi dialect by the Henry Williams and his son Edward on the night of 4/5 February with the singular addition of the word “maori” before “people of New Zealand” in Article third – proof, if more were needed, that the so-called “Littlewood treaty” indeed preceded the actual Maori treaty text, is accurately dated “4th February 1840” and is indeed Hobson’s final English text. Not only was this final draft signed by Hobson, but Busby said that he penned the final English draft. HERE is the proof. HERE is a picture of this final English draft in Busby's handwriting. This final English draft should rightly be displayed at Te Papa, alongside the Treaty in Maori, Te Tiriti.

VERBAL ABUSE

Another Strategy used by Maori activists is verbal abuse. What does this mean? Whenever someone criticises Maoris, or challenges them, the person doing the criticism or challenging is quickly labelled by activists as racist! Or White By Julian Batchelor

supremacist! Or Nazi! Or Colonist! Or Fascist! And so on. 8 Most people are shocked when they are verbally assaulted with these labels. They don’t want these names slapped on them, so they back off as soon as these verbal assaults are issued. Activists know this, so they use these labels often. Most Kiwis are too nice and lovely, and too gullible to understand what’s going on here. They don’t realise that this is simply a trick of the activists to silence opposition. Most activists, if asked, couldn't define the word 'racist'. So how should you react when someone calls you “a racist!”? ANTIDOTE TO VERBAL ABUSE?

Just ignore it, and carry on. A racist is someone who believes one race is superior to all others. Hitler was like that. He was a racist. You are not like that. You believe all people are equal. So never take it personally when someone labels you a racist because you know you are not a racist. As I said, recognise that this is nothing more than a cheap psychological trick that is being played on you by activists. Smile. Be strong and muscle up on the inside. Show that you are not bothered at all. Stand on the truth of who you really are. You are not a racist. This will take the wind out of their sails. It will show them that their trick did not work on you. If enough people react like this, the activists will stop using it. The only reason they keep using it? They use it because they witness Kiwis caving in when labelled with it. By caving in I mean going to ground, quitting, shutting down, withdrawing, shutting up. When activists see you react in these ways, they laugh, knowing that they have got you under their control, which is where they want you. 8 Ironically, they themselves are the greatest racists in New Zealand, only they just can’t see it.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

When I was doing my tour of New Zealand in 2023, I would receive sometimes a dozen texts / emails / phone calls a day from activists telling me I was a racist. I just laughed, and carried on. I want you to react in the same way.

FRIGHTENING PEOPLE: BULLYING, INTIMIDATION, THREATS

Here, Maori activists have used a variety of behaviours such as bullying, intimidation, threats of war, threats to protest, doing the haka with throat cutting gesticulations, Utu (revenge). These are employed to manipulate people to do what they want. As people, we are equipped with powerful imaginations, some more so than others. When someone frightens us, we imagine (watch a movie in our minds) about what it would be like if the threat made by an activist was enacted. What happens next? We become frightened and back off. We cave in. By doing this, we allow activists to control us. We must never ever cave in. If you cave in, you blow wind into the sails of the activists. You'll encourage them to try frightening people more often. If you are a PM, and there is

Maori civil unrest, call in the police, call in the army, but never ever cave in. John Key was a terrible coward who caved in to threats. Watch THIS

video of John Key caving in.

Frightening people is a key activist Strategy to manipulate people into doing what you want. HERE is just one example. HERE is another. HERE is another. Historically, bullying and intimidation were big in Maoridom. "Maori took offence at the breaking of any tapu, however innocently it was done. Slaves were beaten for entering a kumara store, which defiled its contents, entering a cemetery without stripping, and for stepping over the legs of anyone seated or lying down. Some were beaten for remaining silent after receiving a master's orders, which implied dissent, and for approaching a master without adopting a crouching stance. Vengeful masters did not permit their slaves the indulgence of an erect posture and one group of slaves, seen by a French mariner at the Bay of Islands in 1824, crouched at the feet of their master By Julian Batchelor

"waiting in silence for his orders"9 All these 'rules' were made up by chiefs. Why? To bully people. To control people. They want to control you too. Maori took great delight in bullying and intimidating. Their thrill came from having power over people. Today, it's also their way of cancelling free speech. If they don't like what you are saying, they will bully and intimidate you until you stop talking. They will simply cancel you. Activists are good at this.

The point is, people who are frightened are easy to control. Activist Maori know this, so they use this Strategy often. ANTIDOTE TO ACTIVISTS FRIGHTENING PEOPLE?

As I said, never ever give in to being frightened. Stay strong on the inside. Recognise this Strategy for what it is. It’s a cheap psychological trick that activists are trying out on you. Stay strong. Keep your imagination under control and keep moving forwards. Never appease aggressors. Ever. Remember the lesson from WW2? In 1938, British PM Chamberlain agreed to allow Hitler to occupy the Sudetenland (a part of Czechoslovakia populated mostly by Germanspeakers) in exchange for Hitler’s pledge not to invade any other European territories. Basically, Chamberlain was saying to Hitler "OK, your invasion of Sudetenland is illegal and therefore wrong, but I will let you get away with this, as long as you don't invade any other countries." Chamberlain was frightened and caved in. What happened next? The ease with which Hitler was able to squeeze the concession of Czechoslovak territory from Chamberlain at Munich in 1938 emboldened Hitler first to seize all of Czechoslovakia and then to make demands on Poland — demands that would ultimately lead to the outbreak of a general war in Europe. And the enduring “lesson” of 1938? When Maori activists make demands, always choose resolute defiance over naïve appeasement. To do otherwise is to invite catastrophe. "Never appease Maori activists". This sums up this entire booklet.

When you appease them, they laugh and say “See how easy it was to cause him / her / them to cave in! See how easy it is to get cash and assets 9 Trevor Bentley. Pakeha Slaves, Maori Masters. The Forgotten Story Of New Zealand's White Slaves. New Holland Press. p111

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

out of them! See how easy it was to control them!" HERE is an excellent commentary by a Maori medical doctor, written in the 1960s about this issue. We are barely into 2024, and the National Party is appeasing already. Nicola Willis just gave $28m to Maoris for their kapa haka cultural festival Te Matatini. There are 160 cultures in New Zealand, and many have festivals. Can we expect to see the same given to all of them too? If not, then Willis has just promoted apartheid, racism, and separatism. Read the News item HERE By caving in, by appeasing activists in this way, Willis shows she is under their control already. She's just put fresh wind in their sails. She's a frog in the pot. Now here is a good point. Maoris often boast about 'how much they are worth'. In THIS interview, Tuku Morgan says Maori are worth $70billion. Well, Tuku, why are you paying for your own Kapa Haka festival? Why plunder the coffers of all New Zealanders to advance your culture when all other cultures have to pay their own way to advance their culture? It's bludging Tuku. When I was doing my tour of New Zealand in 2023, I sometimes had up to 200 protesters outside the building where I was speaking. Often they were doing a haka. In one place, while I was speaking, the building literally shook as if in an earthquake. A Maori woman got inside the building and at one point, leapt out of her seat, in a split second grabbed my laptop, lid open, raised it above her head, and thrust it down onto a concrete floor. She tipped the data projector onto the ground and the light went out. Watch the video HERE and HERE The result? I just calmly picked up the laptop and data projector, reconnected all the wires, and carried on because I was sure I was speaking the truth, and in the end, truth always wins. There was not one scratch on the laptop or the data projector. Not one. Zero. Don’t wobble on this. Be sure, and keep going forwards boldly and bravely because if you are speaking the truth, you are on solid ground.

MAKING PEOPLE FEEL GUILTY AND ASHAMED

Another Strategy of Maori activists is to make people feel guilt and shame. For example, we are often told that ‘institutional racism’ is everywhere in our By Julian Batchelor

country directed against Maoris, that colonisation has destroyed Maoris, that the reason Maoris top the negative social statistics in every area is the fault of white people, in that whatever ills have beset Maoris, it’s the fault of someone other than Maoris, that Maoris were pushed off their land by colonists, that Maoris had all their land confiscated, that Maoris are suffering today from “the trauma of colonisation”, and so on. Watch THIS video The truth, in fact, is more the opposite. Colonisation has been a Lotto win for Maoris. To know more about the positive effects of colonisation, click HERE If you want to know what the real reason is why Maoris struggle, read THIS. Yes, some Maoris had some land unlawfully confiscated but reparations were made between 1926 and 1960 via a royal commission under Justice Sim. All historic grievances were investigated and full and final settlements were made.10 Significant people, like the great Sir Apirana Ngata (right) , said these confiscations were justified. “Some have said that these confiscations were wrong and that they contravened the articles of the Treaty of Waitangi. The Government placed in the hands of the Queen of England, the sovereignty and the authority to make laws. Some sections of the Maori people violated that authority. War arose from this and blood was spilled. The law came into operation and land was taken in payment. It was their own chiefs who ceded that right to the Queen. The confiscations cannot therefore be objected to in the light of the Treaty”11

We must all remember too that ‘injustices’ were perpetrated in our history by Maoris against Europeans too. Many Europeans were ripped off by Maoris in the early period of our history through dodgy land sales, but we never hear about this. Many others were butchered by Maoris. You can read some of these cases HERE

What happens when people feel guilty and ashamed? They feel that they owe the offended party (i.e. Maoris) something. Maoris demand appeasement12. Like what? Giving Maoris assets like forests and fisheries, or large tracts of land, or rivers, or mountains, money, reparations, apologies. Or even free entry onto local councils, via Maori wards, and so on. To use a Biblical term, they demand ‘guilt offerings’. They are given to 10 Mike Butler. Twisting the Treaty. Tross Publishing, 2014, pp143ff 11 Sir Apirana Ngata. The Treaty Of Waitangi. An Explanation. pp 15-16 12 The dictionary defines ‘appeasement’ like this: “giving people what they want to prevent them from harming you or being angry with you.”

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

appease / relieve the offender’s guilt. What happens next? The guilty also stop opposing any Maori plans and initiatives, no matter how wrong / illegal / undemocratic they might be. Tragically, the guilty and ashamed even join in with the Maori activist cause. That is to say, they feel like they have to keep on saying ‘sorry’ for the supposed wrongs they have done i.e. they jump into the slow boiling pot. To activist Maoris, these people who can’t stop saying sorry are welcomed as new recruits. These new recruits help the activists achieve their plans and initiatives. What’s most important of all for Maori activists is that they have new recruits completely under their control. As I have said before, the goal of all these strategies is to get control of people and to squeeze cash and assets out of them. This explains why weak and naive non-Maori people have joined in with the activist Maori cause, particularly naive easily duped young people and the army of bureaucrats working inside government in Wellington. The following is an example of an encounter I had with a white 'convert'. One day, I was in a supermarket checkout. There were two people in front of me. I struck up conversation with the lady in her 50s next in line to me. We got eye contact and, smiling, I asked her “Hi, are you a reader?” She replied “Yes, I am. What have you got?” I had some Stop Co-Governance booklets in my trolley and pulled one out. I handed it to her. She read the cover and said “Oh good. I wanted to know about this. Thank you”. At this point, a 17 year old white girl, who was packing the bags next to the teller chipped in. She was like a feral wild cat. Truly, her face was all contorted with raging anger. She said “Excuse me, no one wants your racist booklets! Never hand them out in our shop again!” To which I replied “Excuse me. This is a private conversation and none of your business. By the way, we’ve printed half a million of these booklets in eight months and most Kiwis appreciate them. Have you read it?” “No!” she hissed. “And I don’t want to!” Other customers and staff were listening in to this. She stormed off. The checkout operator took over the packing duties of the girl who had just left. I tried to stay calm, as though nothing had happened. This girl had obviously By Julian Batchelor

been brainwashed at school. For some, joining in with the cause of Maori activists has morphed into a religious experience. This girl was an example. She was obsessed, like a devotee in a religious cult, which no doubt is down to cultural programming, otherwise filling a religious vacuum. The Maorification cause had given her meaning in life. ANTIDOTE TO ACTIVISTS' WANTING YOU TO FEEL GUILT AND SHAME?

This incident could have destabilised me. It could have rocked me. To be honest it did shake me a little, mainly because others were listening in. I could have felt guilty and ashamed that I had caused a fuss. The antidote? I went outside into the carpark and started giving out booklets. Half a dozen in fact. Every single person I spoke to was ‘on the same page’ as me. I had a wonderful time. What’s the lesson? When you are attacked, or made to feel guilty or ashamed, react by going on the offensive. Go out and give out more books. Put up a billboard. Give out some flyers. Always end your day on a note of victory, never defeat. Why? If I had walked out of that supermarket with my tail between my legs and gone home, come evening that so called ‘incident’ will have played on my imagination. Then I would start to say in my mind “I am never doing that again” or “I don’t like this. I am going to stop doing it” or “Man, this is full on. I am withdrawing” and so on. It would be so easy to go into a dark place in my mind. This is exactly where the activists want you to be - defeated. That’s the whole point of making you feel guilty and ashamed. You also have to be sure in your own mind, as I have mentioned before, that you are on the side of truth. You have to be sure that you are fighting for a just cause. That you are, truly, the one fighting against racism, apartheid, and separatism. That you are the one fighting for all the 160 cultures living in New Zealand. When you do this, you get bigger and stronger on the inside. Then the darts of shame and guilt will not be able to penetrate your armour. Now here is a great truth. When you go on the offensive, when you react to an ‘incident’ in a good way, you get stronger and better able to handle the next one. 24

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

In other words, you become a bigger better person. Instead of being a wuss, a coward, you become a person of courage and character. You become a winner instead of someone who caves in. The opposite is true too. If you cave in, you’ll cave in for a lesser thing next time. That is to say, you become a smaller person on the inside, and if you keep caving in, you become the worst person of all - a coward. So be careful how you react. When it comes to being made to feel guilty and ashamed, no matter who we are, the antidote is really knowing the history of our country. I want you to never forget what the great Sir Apirana Ngata (right) said. He was New Zealand’s greatest Maori. “Let me acknowledge first that, in the

whole world I doubt whether any native race has been so well treated by a European people as the Maori.” 13

His message? Don’t feel guilty. Be proud about how you and your ancestors have helped Maori. Lift your head high. You need to know the enormous contributions made by ‘colonials’ which have benefitted all people, including Maoris. On the left is a good book to read. You can buy this on our website www. stopcogovernance.kiwi Click HERE to go straight to it on our website.

TRUMPING UP OFFENCES

Another Strategy used by activists is what I call the creation of an eggshell

view of Maoris in the minds of Kiwis.

What is this all about? It’s making Kiwis feel that whenever they deal with Maoris, they have to walk on eggshells. What does this mean? It means activist Maoris work hard on acting like they have been highly offended by something and these offences are deeply grievous to them. They give the impression that they are a very sensitive cultural group who are offended at the slightest thing. Even, for example, pronouncing a Maori word wrongly will attract a strong rebuke from a Maori activist. In the early contact

13 Adam Plover. The Benefits of Colonisation. Tross Publishing. 2022. p94

By Julian Batchelor

period, "...even frowning at a Maori was insulting."14 When the expressway was installed between Auckland and Hamilton, Maoris were able to stop the work. Why? They claimed there was a taniwha in the swamp. At great tax payer expense, the expressway was diverted. Hard to believe this happened, but it did. Read more HERE Most books on the history of New Zealand mention that 'being offended' is a key feature of Maori life. For example, in a memo from Samuel Enderby to Earl Bathurst in the Colonial Office in London, Maori are described as "...a people extremely susceptible to injury and insults." 15 Bruce Moon observes Maoris in history were " Proud, haughty and quick to take offence."16 Dr John Robinson reports similarly: "Where there had been hara, or offences against mana, there had to be utu (or some kind of return)."17 This is an effective Strategy for activist Maoris because they can make up what offends them, on the spot, according to the situation. No one dares challenge them because Maoris operate, so they say, according ‘to deep knowledge and mystical understanding’ which no one else is privy to. So you simply have to believe what they are saying. You then find yourself saying ‘sorry’. Remember how activists wanted a memorial in Wanganui removed? Because it offended them? Read about it HERE. Read Bruce Moon's response HERE. Activist Maori say things like ‘we find such and such offensive’ or ‘such and such showed no respect for our beliefs’ or ‘what you are doing is disrespectful to Maoris’ or ‘by doing such and such you are insulting our mana’ or ‘such and such did not consult iwi’ or ‘The crown did not meet its Treaty obligations and this is offensive to us’ and so on. This Strategy is used often by activist Maoris because it’s worked like a dream for them. How so? Most Kiwis, rightly, do not want to offend anyone, so they immediately back off what they were doing or planning which was ‘offending’ Maoris. They say to themselves about the Maoris ‘Oh, I am so so sorry. I didn’t mean to offend you. What can I do to make amends?’

14 Matthew Wright. Illustrated History of New Zealand. David Bateman Press. 2013. p35 15 Cited in Ian Wishart. The Great Divide. The Story Of New Zealand And Its Treaty. Howling At The Moon Publishers. P122 16 Bruce Moon. New Zealand. The Fair Colony. Second Edition, p15 17 Dr John Robinson. Twisting The Treaty. Tross Publishing, 2014, p18

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

This is exactly what Maori activists want you to think. When they hear someone respond in this way, inside they say ‘Gotcha!’ Being offended is simply a trick. How can we know? Well, there are 160 cultures in New Zealand. How is it that Maoris are the only ones who are continually offended? How is it that we don't hear about any of the other 159 other cultures being offended by anything or anyone, only Maoris? Don't you think that's odd? Why are Maoris the only group who are continually being offended? It's a corruption Strategy, that's why. With the eggshell mentality, activists play on the good natures of Kiwis. Kiwis then cave in. By caving in, they put themselves under the control of activist Maoris, becoming subservient to them. It's activists keeping the frogs in

the pot.

You are the offender, they the offended. Psychologically speaking, offenders humble themselves, bow to those offended and come under them. This goes right back to pre-1840 days when Maoris had slaves. Maori Chiefs had slaves and these slaves did whatever their chief wanted. They bowed to their masters who were easily offended. The desire to control is one of two dark threads running through all these strategies. The other is lying. ANTIDOTE TO ACTIVISTS WANTING YOU TO FEEL LIKE YOU ARE TREADING ON EGGSHELLS WHEN DEALING WITH THEM?

As I have said, no one wants to deliberately offend anyone. Ordinarily, we of course want to avoid doing this. It's a mark of the civilised to be respectful. But what happens if the motive behind the offence is to manipulate you? To control you? What is the best way to handle this? Start by watching THIS video by British comedian Rowan Atkinson on this issue. He clarifies how we should respond. So how should we respond? I ask the activist person who says they have been offended what exactly they are offended about. They will answer that it’s such and such. I say (calmly and gently) “Well, I am sorry you are offended. In my culture, we value free speech very highly. What matters is that all of us are free to express ourselves. If someone is offended by what we say, it does not stop us saying what we want to say. I would ask you to show respect for our culture and the high priority we place on free speech. Have a good day.” And if the issue is about something being Tapu or sacred then say "Your belief that such and such is Tapu is a belief unique to Maoris. I respect the right of your culture to hold this belief. But don't let your Tapu such and By Julian Batchelor

such affect my life and my freedom because what you believe is not what I believe." Whose culture and beliefs should dominate in a country with 160 cultures? Who decides? Why? Obviously, we don't set out to offend people. However, we ought to be able to say whatever we like, graciously and gently, and if in doing so we offend someone, then put it down to a clash of cultures. Whatever you do, don’t apologise for offending activist Maoris. It's all part of the games they play, so don't join in. This will only cause them to use this Strategy on more people to control and manipulate them too.

LYING AND DECEITFULNESS

Activist Maoris are terrible liars. People lie to deceive someone. Why do they deceive? Lying allows activist Maoris to establish control over a situation by manipulating it. When one considers this definition, activists can be seen lying right left and centre. Examples? They lie about: •

colonisation, and how bad it was (read THIS to show otherwise)

•

the Treaty and how Maori chiefs did not cede sovereignty (read THIS and THIS to show otherwise),

•

the Treaty and how the chiefs did not know what they were doing, (watch THIS video to show otherwise),

•

how all their land was stolen (read THIS to show otherwise),

•

how the British did not honour the Treaty (no examples are ever given as to how the British did not honour the Treaty),

•

how our health system is racist (read THIS to see how this lie was exposed),

•

how the Treaty has principles when the original Treaty does not have them (read THIS to see how this lie was exposed). To hear a podcast from Elizabeth Rata on this issue, click HERE

•

how tino rangatiratanga (the Te Reo translation of the English word 'possession' in Article 2 in the Treaty) does not mean what they say it

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

means (i.e. self determination. Read THIS to see why), •

how He Puapua was just a discussion document when in fact it wasn’t (read THIS to get proof that it wasn’t ‘just a discussion document’),

•

the 3 Waters Legislation which was sold as being better for everyone when really it was just theft and corruption. (Read HERE for a report on the dishonesty in this legislation).

Seriously, the lies and deceit coming out of the mouths of Maori activists are as frequent as the sun rising in the East and setting in the West. Recently, a senior Maori leader, Te Huia Bill Hamilton, (right) was caught out bare faced lying about Julian Batchelor and what he was saying in seminars on his 2023 road tour of New Zealand. Bill was also creating racial division. Hence he now appears in this publication. You can read the details HERE. Government statistics show Maori are overrepresented when it comes to dishonesty offences. You can read the details HERE. Then there is the case of chief archivist at Archives New Zealand Anahera Morehu. She lied about the Littlewood final English draft of the Treaty. You can read the details HERE. Samuel Marsden (left) first came to New Zealand in 1814. He was one of the earliest missionaries who lived among Maoris. He reports in his diary that Maoris have two great standout vices. And what were they? Theft and lying.18 Activists also use spin and 'talking it up' to deceive and control people. 'Spin' and 'talking it up' are both forms of lying. Read how they do it HERE. ANTIDOTE TO LYING AND DECEITFULNESS?

Absolutely everything from a Maori activist, either oral or written, must be fact checked. To beat this one you have to presume that everything they are saying or writing is a lie until proven otherwise. They can look you in the eye, smile, and tell you something is true when in actual fact it’s a bare faced lie. So these activists are Oscar winning actors as well, which makes dealing with them trickier than catching an eel with bare hands. Now here I make a very important point. Decent Maori, of whom there 18 Ian Wishart. The Great Divide. The Story Of New Zealand And Its Treaty. Howling At The Moon Publishers. P99

By Julian Batchelor

are many, don't lie and thieve. I consider these people my friends. They are highly embarrassed by the activists whose lying and thieving is bringing shame on them. I have a challenge for 'decent' Maori. Rise up. Turn all the Maori negative social statistics around. Don't leave it to us Pakeha to do the work for you. You do it. Maori activists and other struggling Maori are your people. Take responsibility. Reach down and help them up.

HERE is a good place to start.

THE CAMEL IN THE TENT STRATEGY

The next corruption Strategy is what I have called ‘The Camel In The Tent Strategy’. This Strategy is best explained by a parable which originates in the

Middle East and here it is:

According to this classic tale, one cold night, a camel asks his master if he can put his head in the tent for warmth. “By all means and welcome,” said the man; and the camel stretches his head into the tent. Soon after, the camel inquires if he may also bring his neck and front legs inside. Again, the master agrees. Finally, the camel asks, “May I not stand wholly within?” With pity, the master beckons him into the warm tent. But when the camel comes forward it becomes clear that the tent is too small for them both. “I think,” the camel said, “that there is not room for both of us here. It will be best for you to stand outside, as you are the smaller; there will then be room enough for me.” And with that, the man is forced outside of his tent. The fable is a warning that small, seemingly harmless acts can often lead, over time, to huge negative repercussions. How does this parable relate to Maori activists? To gain control of some piece of land, some situation, or sea, or lake, or mountain, or river, some asset, some person, some entity, some project, they start small. For example, when the Treaty of Waitangi Act was enacted in 1975, the Waitangi Tribunal was mandated to investigate breaches of the Treaty forward from 1975. Only 9 claims were registered. Activists infiltrated the Tribunal. Then in 1984, the Act was amended to investigate claims back 30

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

to 1840. The number of claims rocketed up to 2034 by 200919. The rest is history. The activists start with seemingly small, harmless statements. Usually it’s iwi saying they are offended about something. No one takes much notice. We roll our eyes and carry on. The statements morph into requests and these become more frequent over time. Eventually the requests morph into demands. Then things like 'occupations' happen. Gradual is the key word. They do things over time, like the camel in the tent. Eventually, the demands come to the notice of the public. By then it’s too late. What the activists have done has become entrenched. Often Laws have been passed without the public knowing. And so the takeover progresses. MP Rawiri Waititi is a classic example. His first complaint was that he didn't want to wear a tie in Parliament when everyone else had to. He won that one. The Speaker of the House caved in. Next he was ejected for performing a haka. He lost that one. Next, he started asking questions in the debating chamber in Maori. Now he wants to ask all his questions in Maori. The speaker of the House, Gerry Brownlee (right), allowed it. He caved in. He appeased. This is foolishness. In his 2023 acceptance speech, Waititi did a war dance, and was not ejected. See how he is slowly moving into the tent? It seems that Brownlee and other MPs don't know about this camel in the tent Maori activist Strategy. To their peril, by allowing Waititi to get away with all this, MPs are putting fuel on the fires of Maori takeover. That is to say, the Maori activist camel is

moving more and more into the tent i.e. taking control inside parliament.

Another example? By using all the strategies I have detailed in this booklet, iwi were gifted ownership of Lake Taupo. Next came the Lake bed. After that, the air space above the Lake. Now in full control, they are ratcheting up the corruption. Businesses which use the Lake are being screwed over. HERE is a classic example. The camel has taken over the tent called Lake Taupo. Naive and gullible Kiwis allowed this to happen. Their mistake? Not stopping the first hint of an iwi claim on Lake Taupo. ANTIDOTE TO THE CAMEL IN THE TENT?

19 Mike Butler. Twisting The Treaty. Tross Publishing, 2014, p172

By Julian Batchelor

Watch THIS short video. Across the Tasman, Aboriginal activists saw how well Maori activists were doing, how many billions were pocketed by them, so thought they would have a crack in Australia. Fortunately, Australian MPs were a lot smarter than Kiwi MPs and they put the issue to a referendum. This was, wisely, the right thing to do - let the people decide. That’s how true democracy works. What did the Australian public do? They voted against THE VOICE with a resounding “No!” We need a binding referendum on the Treaty in our nation too, and it needs to happen urgently. The key to beating this one is to have a keen eye out for any activist activity and to oppose it vigorously at the very start. We must demand that Maori clean up their own back yard. Click HERE to know what ‘cleaning up your own back yard’ means. We make the mistake of waiting until the end of a situation before we launch a protest / push back.

HEAVY MANIPULATION / DEVIOUSNESS

Historian Dr Trevor Bentley writes "Maori admired cunning as much as courage."20 Please read this classic case before you go any further. Click HERE. As you just read, a developer wanted to develop a block of land in Whangarei for housing. Local Maoris heard about it. They objected, claiming the site was ‘sacred’. This objection ought not to have progressed. Such a claim ought not to be able to hold up a development. Why? Maoris believe sites are sacred when a Maori has been buried under the ground in the area. They then believe the bones of the dead person are alive. Believing that the bones of people remain alive after they are dead is a religious belief. Science does not support this belief. How is it that in modern New Zealand, religious beliefs of one cultural group 20 Trevor Bentley. Pakeha Slaves, Maori Masters. The Forgotten Story Of New Zealand's White Slaves. New Holland Press. p224

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

can dictate development rights of other people on their private freehold land? This is akin to the same beliefs which led to the burning of witches in the Middle Ages and beyond. This ought never to be allowed, but it is allowed. Church and State must be separated. What does this mean? Here is a definition “In 2014, the Supreme Court [in the US] held that “It is an elemental First Amendment principle that

government may not coerce its citizens to support or participate in any religion or its exercise.”

Did you hear that? The State (i.e. the New Zealand government or local council) should not and cannot force its citizens to participate in any religious exercise. Yet this is happening literally everywhere in NZ. A Maori prayer here, a Maori blessing there - all of this is evidence of religious beliefs being forced on New Zealanders. It's a giant racket, Maori often demanding money to 'bless' something. Really, it's Kiwis forking out to pay for Maori religion. But it's more than this. It's extortion and it's absolutely wrong. If Christians pray at a civic event, or the opening of Parliament, there is never money exchanged for the service. OK, back to the landowner in Whangarei. The activists threaten occupation (bullying and intimidation) which is heavy psychological warfare. The Environment Court is mentioned. This court is stacked with activist judges who are appointed because they are woke and naive, people who have been sucked in by the psychological warfare I am describing here. For more on judicial activism, click HERE These judges are frogs who have been in the frog pot for a very long time. They too are victims of Maori activist propaganda. The key statement in the report is this one “It’s a kahore (means 'no') for all of us. This will not benefit us at all. The 93 homes that are proposed will be for everyone else, except our hapu.” What’s going on here? Answer? Activist Maoris are complaining, objecting, trumping up some offences, citing some fake ‘sacred sites’, hoping to be able to manipulate the land development company into giving them some of those 93 sections for free. The corrupt woke councils nearly always side with Maoris, so the developer By Julian Batchelor

nearly always caves in because he has no choice. Some developers now even factor ‘iwi extortion’ into their development plans. What is this? It’s bribery and corruption, plain and simple. It’s an iwi tax. It’s apartheid. It’s racism. It's witch hunting. Here is another example. Recently, there was a case of a man who wanted to develop his property. You can read the story HERE This involved cutting a path through some sand dunes on his land. Local Activist Maoris kicked up a huge fuss, claiming that there were bones of deceased relatives in the sand dunes. The local man backed down, and now can’t develop his property in the way he wants to. My view? As I said before, he should have fought this all the way and not backed down, at all. As I have said, believing that the bones of people remain alive after they are dead is a religious belief. The landowner in Northland,The Sand Dunes Man, is being forced to participate in Maori religion. So are the Councils. So is the Government. So are young people at our schools and universities. It’s being forced everywhere. All of us are caught up in Maori religion. It is completely wrong.

Why isn’t the media all over this? Answer? The media in New Zealand has been bought out by the government via what’s known as the $55m Public Interest Journalism Fund. They are in league with the activists. You can read about it HERE and HERE But that’s not the end of the matter. I believe activist Maoris make up stories to control people and situations. You should have heard the stories they made up about my land in Rawhiti. You can read my book about our home invasion HERE Really, this ‘bones in the sand dunes’ case was nothing to do with ‘bones in the sand dunes’. It was a made up story. It was about controlling people and getting the upper hand, making other people subservient to Maoris. In other words, as I have already said, a return to pre-1840 New Zealand, where Maori chiefs had slaves. 34

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

Proof that the sand dunes story was made up? Heritage New Zealand archaeologists, as the newspaper article explains, conducted a dig in the dunes and found no bones. In other words, it was proven to be all about control and manipulation. Incredibly, the council is still going to reclassify his land as sacred Maori land.

One developer I know had similar threats made to him, so what did he do? He simply ignored Maoris and carried on developing. The council arrived and demanded he stop developing. He carried on. The council issued fines. He didn’t pay them. He carried on. He didn’t pay the fines. None of them. He refused to back down. He carried on. I believe this is the right response. It’s stressful but it’s the right thing to do. Never forget the lesson the British learned in New Zealand in our early history when dealing with Maoris. (see Lord John Russell's comment on page 49) Maori Activists through their communications put politicians on notice, saying things like 'we are watching' or 'let's see what happens' or 'previous National governments did such and such, will this one do the same?' etc. HERE is an example. Really, it's just heavy manipulation and being devious. ANTIDOTE TO HEAVY MANIPULATION AND DEVIOUSNESS?

Never ever give in to iwi demands, no matter what. If you do, you will blow wind into their sails, and you will embolden them. You will encourage more bribery and corruption. What happens when the next developer comes along? Iwi will be asking for 20 sections instead of 3 out of the 93, all because you caved in to their demands.

ACTING, PLAYING THE VICTIM CARD

Sometimes Maori activists add crying and shows of high emotion into the mix. Acting is a big part of Maori activist psychological warfare. Shows of emotion break down the people watching, making them feel they must back off quickly and support the Maori crying, and then, of course, the activist Maori cause. This is exactly the result the activists are wanting. When I was doing my Stop Co-Governance tour of New Zealand in 2023, I By Julian Batchelor

experienced activist acting on several occasions, usually during the Q&A time. For example, at one of my meetings, a Maori lady in a wheelchair was given the microphone. She explained how she had had to pay $5000 to learn Te Reo. This, she said, was because her parents and grandparents had had Te Reo 'beaten out of them' at school, and as a result of this Te Reo was no longer in her family. By now she was crying. I stopped her, firmly, and told her to stop crying, which she did - instantly. Was her crying an act? You know the answer. I told her that in our early history Maori parents were going to the schools where their kids were being taught, demanding that the Maori children be strapped if they spoke Te Reo. Wisely, these parents and Maori elders knew that learning English was the way forwards for their children. They were right. They were wise. To find out more about how Europeans are not the cause of the decline of Te Reo, click HERE Another example? A city councillor told me that his entire council were taken on a field day to visit ‘sacred Maori sites’, all under the guise of ‘cultural safety’21 and when they got there, on cue, a group of ladies began wailing and crying. Within a few minutes of the councillors passing by, the same ladies were in the cafe laughing and joking around, enjoying a coffee and a muffin. The councillor was only able to report this because he broke away from the group to go to the bathroom and saw it all with his own eyes. Watch THIS video. In a six minute interview, nearly all the strategies are demonstrated. For example, threatening to go to war with the Government (Strategy 3, frightening people), 50,000 person protests (Strategy 3, frightening people), saying that the Treaty is a partnership when it’s not (Strategie 6, lying); Strategy 1, which is spreading Treaty misinformation; telling lies about Rangiriri (Strategy 6 lying, and Strategy 9, playing the victim card), verbal abuse (Strategy 2, calling David Seymour a racist), “it's an attack on the Treaty” (Strategy 6, lying. Seymour is wanting the truth about the Treaty to come out). Tuku Morgan is also using Strategy 8, which is heavy manipulation. So in one interview, 6 strategies were employed: Strategies 1,2,3,6,8,9. 21 ‘Cultural safety’ is code for brainwashing and being subjected to heavy propaganda.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

ANTIDOTE TO ACTING, PLAYING THE VICTIM CARD?

Keep control of your own emotions. Recognise quickly that these activist shows of emotion are fake and they are attempting to manipulate and control you. Stay objective and focused on the issue at hand. They want you to cave in, to become emotional. What happens next? You’ll give in to their demands. Once you give in, they will say to themselves “Gotcha!” Maori author Alan Duff (right), who adapted his novel into the movie "Once Were Warriors" summarises it succinctly when he says: “What we Maori have been hearing, by way of messages and urgings from our leaders, is that we are not at fault for our woes, not at fault for anything bad that happened and is still happening to us. All roads of cause and effect, according to our spokesmen and women, lead to the white man. It’s not our fault we fail at getting the same numbers through high school to university. It’s “Pakeha education, with its Pakeha values, which has failed the Maori”. Think of something, anything, that has gone wrong with Maori, and one or more of our spokesmen will jump up and say, “Hold it a minute. This is not Maori failure. It is the system. We are oppressed.”22

Drill down. What is causing this victim mentality? Answer? Lack of character. It's not taking responsibility for one's weaknesses and flaws. You can read more about Maori and character development HERE

10 GROOMING OR CULTURAL RE-PROGRAMMING There is another aspect of psychological warfare I want to alert you to. What’s that? Grooming or what we might call “cultural re-programming”. What is this about? Activists want to prepare Kiwis for the changeover from democracy to tribal rule. They do this by re-programming / grooming the population, Maorifying us. How? One example was planning to introduce road signs with Maori language on them. This had nothing to do with road safety at all. So what was it? It was a way of forcing Te Reo on the population, reprogramming us. Having Te Reo spoken on the 6pm TV news is another example of cultural re-programming as was the switch of our country's name from New Zealand to Aotearoa. 22 Alan Duff. Maori. The Crisis And The Challenge. Harper Collins. 1998. p16

By Julian Batchelor

A more recent case? Activists are taking the government to court (all legal fees paid by the tax payer of course which is racism and apartheid) for changing the names of government departments back into English. Read

THIS

One has to ask the question "Why all the fuss?" "Why are they demanding that Te Reo be forced on the population?" If Maori want to call a government department by a Maori name, no one is stopping them. So why are they demanding that everyone has to call government departments by a Maori name? Answer? Their drive is a crucial part of grooming the country, getting it ready for tribal rule. The list of other examples is endless. Why are they doing this? The activists believe that by forcing all things Maori, particularly Te Reo, that Kiwis will by osmosis gradually come to accept and embrace Maoridom. That is to say, they will get used to the idea of Maoris being in control, then eventually, over time, will welcome full blown tribal rule. This is how they want their plan to work. Activists have targeted real estate agents, lawyers, the judiciary, medical centres, local councils, schools, hospitals, the police, DOC, and a host of other sectors in our country, grooming them, Maorifying them, re-programming them. These sectors are often required to do what they call ‘cultural safety’ courses. They say these courses are about ‘making the working environment safe for Maoris’ and 'revitalising and preserving the Maori language' but really when they say these things, we are being lied to. They are not the real reasons. These labels are just a ruse. We are being conned. The real motive is grooming / cultural re-programming. And behind this, as I have said, is Maori takeover of the country. How do we know calls for 'revitalising and preserving the Maori language' are a ruse? Well, since 1840 Maoris have had ample opportunity to vitalise and preserve their culture, but they have not taken that opportunity. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been given to Maori for this purpose, but nothing changed. $600m HERE. If you love something, you focus on it, and get it done, especially if you are given a lot of money to do it. The other 159 cultures in New Zealand have shown this to be so. They have taken responsibility to make sure their culture and language flourish, and no government money was given to them to do it. They did it in their own time with their own money. They did it because they love their 38

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

culture and want it to flourish. They are genuine, whereas Maori activists are not. They have hidden agendas. Let me re-iterate - why has Maori culture and language not flourished, in spite of massive financial assistance? What's going on here? Answer? Other motives are at play here. What motives? Cultural re-programming. Nothing more, nothing less. Bruce Moon quotes Apanui Ngahiwi of the Maori Language Commission who wrote: “In fact, it is a taonga protected by article two of the Treaty of Waitangi because that is exactly what the Maori Language Act 2016 (section 8 (g)) says it is. The act creates a partnership between Maori and the Crown for the revitalisation of te reo Maori. It recognises te reo Maori as the foundation of Maori culture and identity and that the lives of iwi and Maori are enhanced by knowledge and use of the language.”23 If the foundation of Maori culture and identity and the lives of iwi and Maoris are enhanced by knowledge and use of the language, why have they not taken responsibility to get the job done in the last 180 years? You now know the answer. What's even more dangerous is that many public servants are being 'required' to speak Te Reo as part of their job description. This is reminiscent of Nazi Germany in the 1920s and 30s where Nazification was forced on the people, getting them ready for what was to come in the 1940s. Read more

HERE

Maorification / cultural re-programming has morphed into a monster with 100 heads and 10,000 tentacles. No sector of New Zealand society has escaped the invasion of a tentacle. Foolishly, and unwittingly, many shops and businesses, not aware of the activists' hidden ideological agendas, have allowed themselves to be Maorified. Recently, local iwi supported by activist MPs placed two Maori "pou" poles outside the steps of Parliament. They cost $500,000 to erect. Why were these erected? Firstly, they are there to groom MPs going in and out of parliament. It’s a subliminal message. Secondly, they are Maori territorial markers for local iwi. What does that mean? It's local iwi saying "This Parliament is ours."

What does that mean? 23 Bruce Moon. New Zealand. The Fair Colony. Second Edition, p65

By Julian Batchelor

Subliminal messages aim to be processed below the level of conscious perception. By doing this, the message is still interpreted by the individual’s senses, but without their conscious awareness. What is the message radical Maori MPs want other MPs to get? "Put the demands of Maoris at the forefront of your minds". "Put Maori needs before all the other cultures". "Maoris demand your attention". "Meet our Maori demands". "Maoris are of utmost importance". "Maoris are not the same as all other cultures in this country". "The British promised Maoris a share of the power, so you had better give it to us." "Maoris demand to be given special treatment and preference". "Maoris are Treaty partners so never forget this", and so on. The truth of the matter is that Maoris are just settlers here, like the rest of us. They are not indigenous. They arrived here around 1250AD. We are all New Zealanders and ought to be treated equally. Democracy demands this. What radical Maori demand is undemocratic - privilege, partnership, and entitlement. None of this is mandated in the Treaty. Other examples of grooming / cultural re-programming? Many businesses, like the BNZ, New World Supermarkets, Westpac, The Reserve Bank, Dominos Pizzas , Mitre Ten, Pak N Save, have been swept up into the Maori religion. These businesses are actively encouraging people to use Maori words. Their communications are sprinkled with Te Reo. ANTIDOTE TO GROOMING AND CULTURAL RE-PROGRAMMING?

If you are with BNZ, change to a non-Maorified bank. Switch service providers. If with New World, change supermarkets. There are lots of things you can do to counter grooming / re-programming. If you have a service provider who sends you correspondence with Maori words, ask them not to. Ask them to show some respect for your culture, whatever your non-Maori culture is. Push back. Demand to be addressed in the language of your own culture, or at the very least in English, the universal and international common language. Tell them that you don’t appreciate being brainwashed, groomed, culturally re-programmed and Maorified. 40

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

Tell them you don’t like it when someone messes with your mind without your permission. If everyone pushed back like this, these woke companies would soon get the message that we want English back as the main language and we want the freedom to be able to choose what language we use in our own country. This is a freedom of choice issue. If Maori want to be communicated with in Maori, then go for it. This is their right too. We applaud this. If there are some woke people who want to be addressed in Te Reo, then so be it. That’s fine too. But don’t force Te Reo on everyone. Let people choose. Go on the offensive. Here are nine things you can do. 1. Put up billboards. You can view some designs HERE. 2. Join your local TEG (Treaty Education Group) Get hold of us to find out where there is one near you (get our contact details by going to Www. stopcogovernance.kiwi). 3. Put bumper stickers on your car (go to Www.stopcogovernance.kiwi to view them). 4. Purchase books about our New Zealand history. ( go to Www. stopcogovernance.kiwi to view them). Be careful though. Many books and publications have been doctored. We only sell books on our site which are written by reputable authors and commentators. 5. Sign up to receive Julian Batchelor’s daily blog (go to Www. stopcogovernance.kiwi ). 6. Become a volunteer to give out flyers. 7. Give financially to support the cause. 8. Stop giving to Charities who have Maorified. 9. Change service providers if they Maorify e.g. change your bank/ supermarket.

11 SHOUTING PEOPLE DOWN I have had many many encounters with Maori activists. You can’t have a conversation with them as they often talk over the top of what you are saying. They usually combine this with aggression. Either way, they are rude. So in order to compete, you have to talk more loudly than them, and become more aggressive than them, which in turn leads to a shouting match. By Julian Batchelor

Most people don’t want a shouting match and they are not aggressive by nature, so they withdraw quickly when they are aggressively shouted at. Activists know this well. 99% of people who are aggressively shouted at by a Maori activist will just walk away. This is the antidote - walk away. Why do activists shout people down? In shouting you down, they want to shut you up. Once again, they want to subdue you, and in subduing you, silence you. And behind this is their need / desire to control people. Once they have you subdued and controlled, they can push on with their agenda to do whatever they want to do, unopposed.

12 MAINSTREAM MEDIA COLLUSION It needs to be noted that the mainstream media in New Zealand is corrupt to the core. Via The $55m Public Interest Journalism Fund, they support and encourage Maori activists with all these strategies. They have morphed into being the Opposition Party, a powerful ally for activists. We could say, rightly, that they are the 12th corruption Strategy. What’s the antidote? Flood New Zealand with the Truth about the Treaty and our history. We must circumvent the media. If the truth in this booklet became widely known, the gravy train would come to a grinding halt. Ultimately, voters hold all the power so we have to get to voters.

The media in New Zealand are working very hard to get as many frogs as possible into the slowly warming pot. We are working to get them out of it. This is war.

Via the generosity of wealthy donors, we are taking TV1 and the Disinformation Project to court, suing them for defamation. They need to be held to account. To counter them, you have to get serious with them, and publicly confront their corruption. The plan is for the 83% non-Maori majority to pay for this co-governance

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

process - in perpetuity. So this change will not be financed by the Maori economy which is growing steadily. This situation will never be clearly explained to NZ citizensv by the media. In reality, they have, and will continue, to hide the fact. The media spin is to push co-governance through as " an established and widely accepted practice". This is a perception which will never be measured nor concrete evidence provided.

13 THE MAORIFICATION OF COUNCILS Most local councils in New Zealand are crawling with woke liberals of all colours and nationalities who have been Maorified. This is because Maori activists have targeted councils. How? They have required them to undertake 'cultural safety courses' which is code for being groomed for Maorification. It's also code for frogs being lured into the pot. These courses have been very effective. Councils have become centres for Maori activism. Now most council staff are well and truly on board with Maorification. Which means what? This means that council staff deliberately try to be vexatious (i.e. make things difficult) for anyone who opposes the Maorification of the country. How do they do this? The following is an example. Up and down the country, we wanted to hire council managed buildings to run public Stop Co-Governance events. So we’d book the venue with the council in the usual way. When they saw that the application for hire had come from Stop Co-Governance, they kicked in with their game playing. What happened? We’d usually make application six weeks out from the event to hire a hall. For example, we’d ask for Saturday night, 7-10pm. They would ask us to submit a 'health and safety plan'. There would be lots of forms to fill out, boxes to tick, toing and froing between us and council. The council would take their time replying. The weeks ticked by. By being polite and ‘nice’, (e.g. starting their letters with 'Dear Julian....' ) you would be led to believe they were genuinely helping you. But they were not helping you. It was part of their game. . By Julian Batchelor

Then, on the Friday afternoon before the event, usually about 4pm, they would notify us that our health and safety plan was “inadequate” and we couldn’t use the building. They obviously chose last minute notification so that there was no time to fix the imaginary/contrived issue. Clearly, they delighted in wasting six weeks of our time. They had a predetermined outcome from the start. They, of course, were all being paid while they played these games. As council employees, they are all on salaries. Essentially, they were being paid to play games. We, as volunteers, were not. This pattern of behaviour was played out, exactly to script, in roughly 10 attempts to hire a council building with 10 different councils. It became obvious that they were colluding. Such is the level of corruption inside local councils. In the end, we switched to only hiring private venues, and this worked. What is sickening about this is that under the guise of 'health and safety' and 'bylaws,' what's really going on here is apartheid and racism and the denial of free speech. It's cancel culture at work. As such, it's also a display of cowardice because the people driving this behaviour don't come right out and say they are racist, promoting apartheid and the cancellation of free speech. Portraying a persona of virtuousness, they hide away facelessly in council buildings, busy with their dirty work.

Another example? We put up billboards all over the country. Soon after we started, woke liberals inside councils who had joined in with the Maori religion started writing letters to us threatening fines. They told us ‘complaints had been received’ and that our signs ‘did not comply with local bylaws’. When asked how they did not comply, the council refused to say specifically. They just said they didn't. When quizzed about this, they replied ‘we’ll send you a link to the council rules so you can find out’. The council ‘rules’ are very complicated and hard to understand. This is why professional planners start private businesses. They become sacred priests who alone can interpret ‘the rules’. If these rules were easy to understand, they would be out of business.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

As I said, initially when asked to specify how our billboards did not comply, no answer was forthcoming. It was up to us to guess. This was done so that we would have to spend a lot of time guessing and searching for clues on the council website. Eventually, 'the rules' around billboards were sent to us but only after continual requests. They hoped we would waste money on hiring a professional planner. Their overall goal was to frustrate, annoy, waste our time, and create unnecessary expense for us. Really, all they needed to do was tell us what we needed to do to comply, and we would have done it. Such a simple solution. But it did not end there. The planner we were dealing with in Whangarei was Kate Biddlecombe (kate.biddlecombe@wdc.govt.nz). We found out, through a professional planner, that we were only allowed one sign per site. We pointed out to Ms Biddlecombe that while we were driving around Whangarei, we noticed that many businesses had up to four signs on one site. I said “What are you going to do about those people? All those who are not complying?” Her reply? “We only investigate the ones we receive complaints about.” Conclusion? This was just a case of censorship, the shutting down of free speech. The punishments issued by council were being dished out selectively. To whom? To those whose message opposed the Maorification of New Zealand, no one else. This was apartheid in action, racist behaviour from council staff. No matter how they dress it up, this is North Korean style local government. What is the antidote to this?

•

Let councillors know what’s going on. Many councillors have not joined the Maori religion and will thus step in and help.

•

Let the mayor know.

•

Name and shame the council staff who are involved.

•

File an Official Information request to find out who complained and get the records of internal correspondence inside the council. It is possible no one complained i.e council staff contrived the complaint.

•

You can't let the media know, because they are corrupt as well. In fact, they lead the charge.

By Julian Batchelor

THE RADICALISATION OF THE GENERAL MAORI POPULATION BY MAORI LEADERS

One of the key strategies used by Maori activists is to radicalise other Maoris. The dictionary defines radicalisation as “the action or process of causing someone to adopt radical or extreme positions on political or social issues.”

Radicalisation in New Zealand is done mostly by Maori leaders. Why? Because what they say is picked up by the Mainstream Media so that it can be read / heard / watched by average Maoris. What’s the purpose of this? It’s to whip up anger, hate, and resentment against non-Maori, particularly Europeans who are seen as 'evil colonists’. HERE is a video of Maoris being radicalised by a Maori leader. Waititi is not alone. HERE is another video of a young Maori who has been radicalised. I am going to ask you to read THIS newspaper article to illustrate what I mean by 'radicalised'. For example, Dame Tariana Turia says ‘the system’ makes Maoris ‘slaves within a foreign system that has been imposed upon them’. She wants Maoris who read this to think that they are victims. That is to say, the reason they are not succeeding in life is because something bad (i.e. the foreign system) has been imposed upon them. What does this do? It gets them thinking that they can’t do anything about their bad circumstances until this bad thing has been removed. It is not within their control to remove the bad thing, whatever it is. Then what? They start to hate / resent / feel angry towards the people who are doing the imposing, which is non-Maori, mainly 'white people'. Hate quickly develops. Then what? Racial division and animosity are accelerated. The extreme end of this is civil war. But this is not all. Non-Maori watching on see more and more angry Maoris about the place, seemingly looking eager for confrontation. In turn this makes them feel that Maoris are a dangerous, angry, resentful mob who must be appeased. Non-Maori, generally speaking, compared to Maoris, are a peaceful culture. They want to de-escalate conflict. Maori activists are seen as people who want to escalate it. After that? Two responses. First non-Maori feel that to get Maoris to calm 46

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

down, appease the mob, they have to start saying "sorry". Or second, they keep quiet, go into hiding, keeping a low profile. Either way, these results are exactly what the Maori activists want. Which is? They want to get you under their control so that they can push on with their agenda, unopposed. If you are an MP, they want you to cave in to their demands by appeasing them. Another leader, Ken Mair, is quoted as saying “Anybody that believes in justice will have no choice but to get up and take action at a real fundamental level of systemic change, overturning the system. And it’s going to be challenging, it’s going to be extremely difficult because we’ve got a small number of people who are very well off economically and in a sense have the political grunt behind them to continue with this behaviour.” What is the effect of statements like these on young impressionable Maori minds? They read this as “We have to rebel against the government. Fight

back. Commit violence. Protest. White rich people are causing my life to be hell.”

Then what? More racial division and hate towards non-Maoris. Then what? Same as before - Non-Maoris watching on see more and more angry Maoris about the place and they respond in the ways I have already described. This is exactly the result the Maori activists want. Which is? They want to get you under their control so that they can push on with their agenda, unopposed. So there is a pattern here. It looks like this. Maori leader / Activist: They say something in public which gives average

Maoris reason to think that they are victims.

Maoris listening: Becomes angry, resentful, hateful towards ‘the oppressors’. Thus the radicalisation process begins. Maoris listening: Expresses himself / herself with outbursts of anger and

violence.

Non-Maori: Observe Maori aggression / violence / anger Non-Maori: Want to de-escalate the situation. Non-Maori: Reach out to average Maoris to appease them, say sorry to them. Maori leader / Activist: They celebrate because non-Maori have come under

their control.

By Julian Batchelor

Conclusion: Radicalising average Maoris is a successful means to get non-

Maori to lie down and not oppose the Maori takeover of the country. i.e. keep the frogs slowly boiling in the pot AND get more frogs to jump into the pot. Other inflammatory statements made in this article intended to radicalise those who are reading?

Turia (right): this is our land. Turia: we are not putting up with this. Turia: we need to stand up and be counted. Turia: we need to go out and stop them in their tracks. Turia: do whatever it takes.

For radicalisation to work, lies and misinformation have to be woven in. For example: Ken Mair ( right) :

•

[colonials] came in and thieved and stole our land.

•

they continue to perpetuate their privileges through theft of our land.

•

foreigners (i.e. the British) told us we would be decision makers in our lands.

Mair: On David Seymour’s Treaty Bill.

•

It’s an attack on us as Maoris.

•

It’s an attack on us.

•

It’s all about putting us in our place.

•

It’s Pakeha saying to Maoris ‘you do as we tell you and we know what’s best for you'.

•

the attack is right across the board, and we should be standing up and responding to those attacks.

•

we are not going to tolerate this.

•

we still remain slaves to them (i.e. Pakeha)

•

every election brings anti-Maori rhetoric, anti-Maori people or movements. How long are we going to put up with that nonsense?

•

[Seymour is saying] Let’s do away with the Treaty.

Mair: They [presumably the Government] have been emboldened with all of

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

this so we’ve got to get serious. Turia: I didn’t get to this age in life to have people think that they’re going to do this to us and there won’t be a response. There will be.

These statements by Maori leaders are fuel on the fires of Maori radicalisation. They are also loaded with corruption strategies e.g. "It's an attack on Maoris" (Strategy 9, playing the victim card). "They came in and thieved and stole our land" (Strategy 6, Lying). Essentially, they constitute hate speech because they are inciting hate. What’s the antidote? Respond with facts. De-escalate. Show how Peters and Seymour and the Government are not attacking Maoris. Rather, they are defending democracy, free speech, one person one vote, all votes of equal value. They are fighting against apartheid and racism. They are taking New Zealanders back to the original intent and meaning of the Treaty in Maori, Te Tiriti. They are exposing these 18 strategies. Show how the Treaty Bill is not doing away with the Treaty but going back to the original meaning of it. The Bill is about fact checking. It’s about being honest and what the Treaty really says. Show how Maori land was not stolen but sold. Click HERE to see the research on this. It's showing Maoris that they are suffering from

seller's remorse, and they need to face this fact and deal with it once and for all.

Show how the Treaty does not mandate ‘partnership’ or ‘co-governance’. Rather it mandates all New Zealanders coming together as one people under one government, with everyone having equal rights and responsibilities. With all these strategies, the key word is unopposed. By controlling people, activists knock out opposition. Essentially, they want to go about their work unopposed. This is why I was so vigorously opposed by activists on my 2023 tour of New Zealand. You saw how hard they tried. For them, thus far, these Strategies to knock out opposition have worked like a dream. They have been able to spread misinformation without opposition, abuse people without opposition, make people feel guilty and ashamed without opposition, make us feel like we have to tread on eggshells when we are around them without opposition, frighten people without opposition, lie and deceive people without opposition, act and play the victim card without By Julian Batchelor

opposition, groom and re-program the population without opposition, act out their racism without opposition, spread their apartheid without opposition, confuse people without opposition, make emotionally charged statements with no proof of their veracity without opposition, and so on. They have been able to get into the tent, like the parable of the camel, without opposition. Watch other Maori leaders radicalising young people HERE and HERE and HERE The great problem with all this is, as former US President Jimmy Carter said, ‘aggression unopposed becomes a contagious disease’.

Which means? The big mistake Kiwis have made in the past 45 years or so is that we have not stood up and opposed all this. We have failed to learn from history because we have failed to study our history. Now Maori activism has become a contagious disease. Thankfully, in the 2023 elections, defibrilator style, many New Zealanders finally woke up, and began to oppose all this. But as I have said, we have a long way to go. Many are still asleep. They are frogs still in the pot. We must continue to stand up and oppose the Maori activists and their woke fellow travellers vigorously until co-governance is expunged. Many Kiwis do not know / realise that in 1843, the British Parliament considered that they had failed with colonising New Zealand. The first governor, Hobson, had died two years after taking office. It was put down to stress. The second governor, Fitzroy, committed suicide. What was causing all this stress? There were many factors, but the main one, it was considered, was that the British had been too soft on Maori, bowing down to them and appeasing them.

Back then, in the early 1800s, Maori were using intimidation and bullying to manipulate British officials. As well, they started to realise that land was valuable so they were hiking up prices. They had started to milk the system as far back as the early 1840s. Professor Bain Attwood reports : "[Governor Fitzroy (1843-45) reported to the British government]...the exhorbitant prices the natives were asking for their land."24 They began to disregard British law and authority, thus breaching the Treaty. Sound familiar? (e.g. “Tweaking democracy” “Maori wards” “The tyranny 24 Bain Attwood. Empire and the Making of Native Title. Sovereignty, Property, And Indigenous People. Cambridge University Press. 2022. p 252

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

of the majority” “Taking revenge against Auckland City Councillors who voted ‘no’ to Maori wards” etc) Commenting on this problem, the former colonial secretary Lord John Russell (right) said in 1843: “This is the consequence of want of firmness in not resisting unjust demands. Such conduct [being soft on Maori] appears humane and generous, and kind;

But really it is a weak yielding to intimidation and foolish concessions which lead to absurd demands. Such is always the consequences, especially when you are dealing with savage tribes”.25

This is significant. It's the truth of history and we ought to learn from it. Can you see how history is repeating itself? Colonial administrators in our early history created problems by not being firm with Maoris. The weakness and cowardice of certain New Zealand MPs, going back to 1840, of all parties, are to blame for the rampant apartheid, racism, and separatism - for the breakdown of democracy - that we see in our nation today. Our MPs have succumbed to one or more of the corruption strategies detailed in this booklet, and look at the results. For example? Maori seats were first created in 1867 under the Maori Representation Act. They were created in order to give Maoris a more direct say in parliament. The electorates were intended as a temporary measure lasting five years but were extended in 1872 and made permanent in 1876. Weak wussy politicians have never had the guts to abolish them. The 1986 Royal Commission on Electoral Reform recommended that if a proportional voting system was adopted, the Maori seats should be abolished. In the 2023 election, Te Pati Maori got 3.08% of the vote, and 6 MPs. Act got 8.64% and only 11 MPs. NZ First 6.08% and 8 MPs. It's plain wrong that Maoris are so advantaged in this way i.e. so few votes and so many MPs. After the election in 2023, over 30% of MPs identified as Maoris yet Maoris are only about 14% of the population.

They are doubly over-represented. 25 Bain Attwood. Empire And The Making Of Native Title. Cambridge University Press. 2022. pp224-25

By Julian Batchelor

Where are the gutsy MPs to stop this nonsense? Read more HERE

Succumbing cannot, and must not, continue. No more appeasement. No more caving in. Want another example from history? "On his return to Sydney (from New Zealand) in October 1834, an exasperated Captain Anglem reported that both the shore station at Otago Harbour and his ship Lucy Ann had been plundered by Maori. 'They often take whatever suits their fancy, such as clothing, and food off our very plates - help themselves to oil, in such quantities as they require, from our pots. They say white people are afraid of them, for great number of vessels have been taken and plundered by them and white men killed, and Europeans dare not come and punish them." 26 What's the lesson? Give in to activist Maoris, and you seal your own fate. What fate? When you appease them, you fuel their fires to demand more and more. You feed an insatiable monster, making it bigger and stronger. Another example? In New Zealand's early history, Maoris were dead keen to have settlers set up communities close to their pa. Their motive? Well, it looked like they were being friendly and kind. But in reality? It was self interest. Here is a first hand account: "At the Bay of Islands in 1821, the missionary Frances Hall recorded how Ngapuhi, when preparing for their great musket campaign against the Hauraki tribes, took control of the three missionary blacksmith's shops at Rangihoua: 'The Natives have been casting Balls all day in Mr. Kemp's shop. They come in when they please, and do what they please and take away what they please." James Kemp, one of the affected blacksmiths, complained, "The object in letting us live amongst them, is to get all they can from us, self interest is the motive by which they are attached."27

The lesson? Missionaries and early settlers were too kind and gracious with Maoris. They failed to stand up to them. The result? Maoris abused their kindness and grace, and trampled all over the settlers. Successive governments have bent over backwards to help / be kind to Maoris. But how have Maori activists responded? They have responded by spitting in the faces of New Zealanders with the 18 Strategies. 26 Trevor Bentley. Pakeha Slaves, Maori Masters. The Forgotten Story Of New Zealand's White Slaves. New Holland Press. p207 27 Trevor Bentley. Pakeha Slaves, Maori Masters. The Forgotten Story Of New Zealand's White Slaves. New Holland Press. p197

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

We need strong powerful leaders in Parliament, savvy brave people who know the Treaty like scholars, and who know all these corruption Strategies and Maori Activists like the back of their hand. Only these kinds of leaders can get us out of the mess we are in now and back into Treaty Truth, equality, one law for all, and back to full blown democracy. No more cowards, no more appeasers, no more pussies.

15 SOWING CONFUSION Activists try to confuse the public. How? By interspersing the Maori language with the English language. In other words, they cloud clear communication. Why do they do this? They want to frustrate their readers, hoping that they will eventually give in, and start learning Te Reo in order to get the meaning of what they are reading. Basically, it’s manipulating the population to learn the Maori language. The ultimate goal of interspersing English with Maori words is to have people join in with the Maori takeover, or at the very least not oppose it. In other words, once you start learning Te Reo, and using it, and you become proficient, your desire to oppose Maorification will dissipate. That's their plan. In legal documents or contracts, it’s particularly dangerous to intersperse Maori with English because Maoris can then make up what the Maori words mean as they go along. The key to good contracts and other legal documents is that the language is clear to all parties at the point of signing, and the words can’t change in meaning as the contract ages. If Maori words are in contracts, and one of the parties signing is Maori, they can, as time goes on, revisit the contract, claiming that such a word did not mean such and such. Rather it means such and such. As such, the door is wide open for corruption. But it is more than this. Interspersing Te Reo and English is grooming and conditioning the population, preparing them for ever increasing levels of Maorification, the end game being the installation of full blown tribal rule. By Julian Batchelor

The fact is, most people don’t ‘crack’ and start learning Te Reo. The opposite is happening. The general population is becoming anti-Te Reo, pushing back against learning it or speaking it. When something is forced on people, anger rises. This is how Kiwis are. Kiwis don't like to be conned.

MAKING EMOTIONALLY CHARGED STATEMENTS WITH NO PROOF OF THEIR VERACITY

Another Strategy Maori activists use to great effect is making emotionally charged statements without providing proof/ detail / verification i.e. they make baseless claims.

HERE is an article written by Margaret Mutu (her surname used to be MutuGrigg) which is packed with examples of this 16th Strategy. For example, she says things like: "The [coalition agreement] the parties have made is in breach of so many international laws" No detail is given as to which laws. "The [coalition agreement] is also just in breach of common humanity." No detail is given about how this is so. The politicians in the coalition agreement " ..are stripping us [Maori] of fundamental human rights that we’ve struggled over the past 50 years to take small steps towards." No detail is given as to what rights Margaret is talking about. "I think a lot of people don’t realise that Maori human rights aren’t recognised in this country the way they were supposed to be." Again, Margaret gives no detail as to what rights she is referring to. "If we look at it through an ao Maori lens and what was agreed to in Te Tiriti, our property isn’t properly protected, our rights to medical care, education, and housing aren’t properly protected — there’s a whole heap of things." We are not told where in the Treaty these things are promised to Maoristis. The truth? They are not promised in the Treaty, but Margaret just says they are. "[Maori] are working towards a constitutional basis for this country that doesn’t allow the sort of horrible, grossly obnoxious behaviour that we’re currently seeing [from politicians involved in the coalition]" 54

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

Notice how emotionally charged her statements are? Yet she gives no examples. What is the effect of these statements? They elicit strong emotions in those who read them. Then what? People become emotionally charged in favour of the activist cause. Readers just presume that because Mutu is a professor in Maori studies at Auckland University, she must be telling the truth.

There is no need to fact check what she is saying or to drill down deeper.

HERE is a deeper analysis of what Margaret said.

What is the net result of all these strategies? There are many results, but two results stand out from the rest. First, as I have said earlier, these strategies have created terrible racial division. Ironically, Luxon keeps saying that he doesn't want a referendum because it will create division. Incredibly, he does not understand that division is already here, and that the activists, via these 18 strategies, have created it. How can a Prime Minister be so out of touch with reality? Non-Maori, and many Maoris, have observed with their own eyes elite Maori getting richer and richer, and many Maoris on the street getting poorer and poorer. They resent what they see. So the division is now inside Maoridom, Maoris resenting Maoris. It's not strictly 'racial division' but it's unnecessary division. The other 159 cultures living in New Zealand have also noticed Maoris receiving special privilege and handouts not given to any other cultural group. Kiwis detest this racism and apartheid, which is what this is. They abhor unfairness. This too has bred resentment and anger in non-Maori towards Maoris. The result? More racial division. But there is more to come. Maori leaders have radicalised young Maoris, filling their minds with the idea that they are victims. So in turn, they begin to hate non-Maoris, the Government, and 'the system'. Non-Maoris observe angry Maoris roaming around, and they resent their aggression and obnoxious behaviour. The result? Non-Maoris hate towards Maoris. By Julian Batchelor

Put all these aspects of racial division together, and what do you have? One socially very sick divided country. A powder keg, in fact. What is most fascinating to observe is how Maori activists twist the narrative, accusing the coalition government of causing division. Hard to believe they do this, but it's true. Click HERE and HERE for examples. Such twisting is evidence of Strategy 6 (lying and deceitfulness), Strategy 9 (playing the victim card), Strategy 15 (creating confusion), Strategy 16 (making emotionally charged statements with no proof of their veracity), and Strategy 1 (spreading Treaty misinformation). All these strategies are evident in THIS NZ Herald article. When a government compromises on democracy, not treating people equally, to any degree, as successive governments since 1975 have done, then racial division is a natural result. "Please, Mr Luxon, wake up. Get out of the fast warming pot with all the other frogs. Racial division is already here, slowly brewing since 1975, the very cause of which, through policy, you are going to support and encourage."

The utter folly of Luxon's position on co-governance is eye watering. He appears seriously mixed up / confused in his thinking. For more click

HERE

A second standout result of these 18 corruption strategies? Many Kiwis have believed the lies put out by the activists about the Treaty. Meaning what? Look at the table below. This table gives facts about the Treaty.

The Treaty in Maori, AKA Te Tiriti What Activists Say It Says

The Truth About What It Says

Maori chiefs did not cede sovereignty. Therefore NZ belongs to Maoris and they want it back.

The Chiefs ceded sovereignty completely and forever.i.e.agreed to be ruled by the British government

Maoris only gave the British Maoris gave the British the right to permission to govern unruly settlers, rule over Maoris and settlers.. not Maoris. In 1840, Maoris considered that all In 1840, the British considered that the land in New Zealand belonged to all the land in New Zealand belonged them. to Maoris. 56

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

Today Maori say all their land was stolen.

Maori did not have their land stolen. They sold most of it. Maori sold 92% of their land. Evidence? Click HERE What Maori are suffering from today is sellers' remorse. They have never accepted the fact that they sold their land.

Maori today say their land was confiscated.

Sir Apirana Ngata says land confiscations were justified. Click

The Maori's end game is tribal rule replacing democracy. Again, activists and the media are being deceitful by hiding this final goal.

Via the Treaty, The British installed democracy in New Zealand. The Treaty does not give a mandate for tribal rule.

Maoris say they deserve and demand special status and privilege because of their imagined 'indigenous' status.

In a democracy, all people are to be treated equally. No group is to be given special status and privilege.

HERE Any unjust confiscations were compensated prior to 1960. Today Maori say they are in a There is nothing in the Treaty about partnership / co-governance partnership or co-governance. Click arrangement with the Crown HERE for proof. Maoris today cite Justice Cooke's An apple is akin to an orange statement that "The Treaty is akin to because they both grow on a tree. a partnership". But an apple is not an orange. Cooke did not say the Treaty was a partnership, nor was it a partnership. To have any group take control Maoris talk co-governance and partnership, but ultimately they want of the country other than the democratically elected government full control. Proof is HERE. They is treason. It's a coup. downplay this goal.

By Julian Batchelor

Maoris claim they are oppressed by colonisation, and thus are victims.

Colonisation has been a Lotto win for Maoris. Pre-1840, they were a primitive stone age tribal group, self-annihilating. Today they live in relative peace with all the benefits of the modern world. There is no hard evidence to back their claims that they have been oppressed by colonisation. Why? No evidence exists.

Maoris claim their poor performance Maori today cannot point out one is caused by 'the white system' right / privilege / benefit which nonimposed upon them. Maori receive that Maori cannot receive. In fact, Maoris today receive more rights / privileges / benefits than the rest of the population so they ought to be thriving as a race. But they are not. HERE is why. Again, there is no hard evidence to back these claims. If there is a ‘white system’, it is called ‘civilisation’. i.e. their claims are baseless. Maoris say they are indigenous and therefore deserve special status and treatment. Again, there is no hard evidence to back their claim to be indigenous. There is much evidence to the contrary i.e. other cultures were here before Maoris.

Maoris are not indigenous. They came here from elsewhere in the Pacific. Other Kiwis have come from different parts of the world too. We are all just settlers and therefore equal. Proof Maoris are not indigenous? Click HERE.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

The word Kawanatanga is the Maori word for sovereignty. Activists say it does not mean sovereignty the way the dictionary defines it. For activists, it only means Maoris gave the British permission to rule over settlers. i.e. the British had no control over Maoris. e.g “The chiefs do allow the Queen to have kawanatanga, a nominal and delegated authority so that she can control her people.” Assoc. Prof Sandy Morrison, Waikato University, “Waikato Times” 1 December 2017

The British understood this word to mean '‘government’ or ‘complete power to govern a country” From a British perspective, Maoris ceded sovereignty i.e. Maoris gave the British the right to completely rule over Maoris forever. Sir Apirana Ngata would agree. Click HERE to read his comments. “The chiefs ... cede to the Queen of England for ever the entire Sovereignty of their country” (Hobson’s final text in English of 4/2/40. “Kawanatanga katoa o ratou wenua”. (The treaty). “Kawanatanga” is the translation of “Sovereignty”.

Maori Activists claim they are fighting The truth of the matter is that activist against genocide, apartheid, and Maori have created an apartheid state by demanding special rights. colonisation. Watch THIS video. There was never 'genocide' in NZ. No proof is given as to how or where genocide ever happened in our history. Colonisation has been a Lotto win for Maoris. Maori were not the subject of genocide, ever. Rather they were the group of people who perpetrated it. Click HERE

By Julian Batchelor

The phrase 'tino rangatiratanga' is Maori for the English word 'possession' in Article 2. Activists say it means 'unqualified exercise of chieftainship' i.e. Maoris never gave up their right to rule and reign New Zealand. It is from this word that activists get the idea that the right to rule New Zealand is theirs. By twisting the meaning of this word, they claim that they did not cede sovereignty.

For the British, 'tino rangatiratanga' simply means 'possession'. The British were wanting to assure the chiefs that the ownership of their land would be protected. i.e. not taken from them by force. Via the Treaty, Maoris were free to retain or sell their land. That is all. They sold 92% of it. Which means what? When they sold it, they lost control of it forever.

The word 'taonga' is the Maori word for 'property' in Article 2. The original meaning of the word was 'property acquired by the spear'. Activists changed this meaning to 'treasures' i.e. anything Maoris treasure, which gives Maoris unlimited scope to 'claim' whatever they like

The British intended the word to mean the property on the land they 'occupied and enjoyed'. In today's terms, it would be anything on your quarter acre section, in or outside your house, but within the boundaries of your section. i.e. House and contents. That is all.

What happens when the population of New Zealand drink in all this misinformation about the Treaty shown in the table above, left hand column? Answer? Many become activists. Not only do they jump into the pot with all the other frogs, but they become 'useful idiots'. Lenin used the term often during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and psychological manipulation. In the picture there are two young women who look non-Maori. They have been duped by Maori activist misinformation. Succumbing to lies, they have joined in with the Maori activist cause. How does this pan out in reality? The following is an example. We (i.e. Stop Co-Governance) held a march in Wellington, calling for the nation to honour Te Tiriti, the Treaty in Maori. Some of our placards said 'Honour Te Tiriti'. At the same march, anti Stop Co-Governance protesters, those who opposed our movement, would turn up with banners saying 'Honour Te Tiriti'! The table on the previous pages explains why this tragic situation exists. It's just a fact that Treaty misinformation has flooded our country with no 60

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

alternative voice in existence to challenge it. Remember, the media in New Zealand, via the $55m Public Interest Journalism Fund, have been paid to promote the left hand column. With only one voice out there, the two girls in the photo above didn't stand a chance of NOT being recruited into the Maori activist cause. They were easy pickings. Really, if all the claims made in the left hand column were true, I would join in with the Maori activist cause. The problem is, none of them are true. Not one. Thus in 2024, Julian Batchelor will be touring the country from town to town, teaching the truth about the Treaty - The Treaty Truth Tour 2024!

MAORIS DEMANDING THE SOLE RIGHT TO INTERPRET THE TREATY

I touched on this in Strategy 1, and I am going to expand on it here. Activists have no basis / proof that the Treaty mandates partnership or cogovernance, or self determination, or dual government. So how do they get around this? Answer? They insist that they be the sole arbiters of what the Treaty in Maori says. Counter-interpretations by non-Maoris are denigrated. In this way they can bend and contort what the Treaty really says and no one can challenge them. There can be no open debate. This makes fraud easy. Anyone with an IQ over room temperature will see through all the smoke to what is really going on here. It's corruption, plain and simple. HERE is an example of what I mean. For example, the Waitangi Tribunal uses its own unique interpretation of the Treaty as the basis of all its recommendations. They can therefore make up what the Treaty says and does not say. The tribunal members have morphed into sacred priests, and the Treaty a sacred document up there with the Bible. No one can argue with them, for their interpretation, according to them, is the only one that is correct. But if the Tribunal has been hijacked by activists, and it has, what then? You know the answer. Professor Elizabeth Rata puts it like this: "Here the treaty is transformed from an historical document to a sacred text. This mystical transubstantiation takes the treaty into the realm of the spiritual from where it acquires a By Julian Batchelor

doctrinal authority – one to be interpreted for we common folk by a new priesthood – treatyist intellectuals." Read her full essay HERE.

HERE is another article where the author insists that Te Papa displays on its wall not the final English draft of the Treaty (i.e. the Littlewood draft) but a fresh 'interpretation' of the Treaty provided by, of course, the sacred priests of Maoridom. HERE is another article full of the same ideas, written, as you would expect, by an activist. On the right above was a post produced by activists28 and given to the staff at Te Papa. Only a complete fool would not be able to see the real intention behind this propaganda. The 'Maori experts' will lie about what the Treaty really says, and so fool the public into believing more Treaty misinformation. Why has David Seymour's proposed referendum on the Treaty invoked such ire and fear among Maoris? It would bypass the sacred priests, the untouchable class inside the activist network. What's the risk for Maoris if non-Maoris interpret the Treaty? The truth about the Treaty would become public knowledge. And then? All the Treaty fraud and corruption would be exposed. The Waitangi Tribunal would be disbanded. The Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 repealed. And then? There will be massive public pushback leading to the end of the gravy train. This, of course, is the worst nightmare for activists. The activists' party would, finally, be over. Hundreds of thousands of frogs would be jumping out of the pot, free from the bondage of relentless and sustained activist propaganda. New Zealand would return to democracy and peace.

18 DOWNPLAYING TRUE INTENTIONS + DEFLECTION Activists are extremely cunning and there is no one as cunning as Willie Jackson. In one 14 minute interview, he employs nearly ALL 18 Strategies Watch THIS video. Activists will never tell you their true intentions. Why? Because if they came straight out and said "We are working steadily and determinedly towards taking over the country and we are enjoying cooking all you frogs slowly" there would be public uproar. So what do they do? They play down their intentions so as to put their readers / listeners / watchers at ease. They calm the frogs down. 28 Facebook post on the website of the Aotearoa Liberation League, December 20, 2023

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

Why have the population of New Zealand in a state of ease? People who are in such a state let their guard down, and pay less attention to activist manoeuvring. Pay less attention to the heat of the water. This is what activists want. Three times Willie Jackson assures Jack Tame that "co-governance is nothing to worry about" (go to 1:15, 4:26; and 7: 54 on the video). Jackson bluffs and blusters, lies, not answering the key question Tame puts to him which is "Is co-governance democratic?" Jack Tame, ever the left wing liberal, let's him off the hook. Jackson's answer should have been "No, co-governance is not democratic". That would be the truth. The truth is also that co-governance ought to be a huge worry for all New Zealanders. The point is, Jackson, a machine gun liar, does not say what Maoris are really up to, which is taking over the country. Full analysis is HERE Another term for bluffing and blustering is deflection. What is deflection? It's when the person being asked the question (i.e Jackson) by the interviewer (i.e. Tame) doesn't answer the question. What do they do? They try and either answer with another question, or change the subject. Jackson does this over and over in this interview. Sean Plunket would never have let Jackson off the hook, but Tame did. OK, back to the Strategy of downplaying true intentions.

HERE is another example. Buddy Mikaere, a self-proclaimed Maori historian, is questioned by Sean Plunket about the coalition government wanting to cut back on the use of Maori language in public. Mikaere's response? "[the speaking of Te Reo] ...it's an evolution and it's unstoppable [here, Mikaere is just talking it up. It's very stoppable as few people are actually speaking it]. Why not just let it happen?" In other words, "Don't worry about Te Reo being forced on the population. Relax. Let it happen. Everything is going to be OK." Really, it's also gaslighting. Which means what? Mikaere is implying that you are a bit of a nutcase if you worry about the population all speaking Te Reo. Jackson is the same. You are a nutcase if you are worried about co-governance. No one wants to be labelled a nutcase, so they start to say to themselves "Co-

By Julian Batchelor

governance is nothing to worry about" and "Everyone is speaking Te Reo, so just roll with it." Just like Willie Jackson, Mikaere is downplaying the reality. What reality? Activist Maoris are using Te Reo to groom the population, getting us ready for tribal rule, downplaying true intentions. Another favourite line of Maori activists is "Co-governance is going to be good for everyone." Over and over they say this, trying to calm everyone down by putting them at ease. Watch THIS video. Really, when they say these things, it's Strategy 6 in action, lying and deceitfulness plus Strategy 1, spreading misinformation, and Strategy 10, grooming. The truth? Co-governance is not going to be good for everyone. It's going to permanently wreck our nation, because it destroys democracy, spreads apartheid and racism, creates racial division and inequality. It replaces democracy with tribal rule. And given that it's illegal, and not mandated in the Treaty, it should not be entertained in any way whatsoever. The good news? Kiwis are waking up to this nonsense, and they are saying 'No!' to being conned and gaslit. They have had enough of Maori activists' lying, deceit, bluff and bluster. Watch THIS Alan Jones (Australian broadcaster) video. Thomas Sowell (above) said “When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.”

He's talking about Maori activists. They have become like that.

Where to from here? In combination, these 18 corruption strategies have enabled Maori activists and their woke fellow travellers to progress with their plans to take over the country, unopposed. Too many Kiwis are frogs being slowly boiled. It would be fair to say that New Zealand as a nation is fighting for its life at the moment. This is not the first time. Others have fought for our freedom, for our democracy, for equality, in the two great World Wars, and other wars. That was their time to fight, and they did it, with honour, bravery, and valour. Many lost their lives in the process. You know that. This is what ANZAC Parades are all about. We must not let their deaths be in vain. This is our time in history. 64

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

What am I going to tell my children and grandchildren when they ask me about what I did to save my country in my generation? Will I just go quiet, and change the topic of the conversation, or will I quietly get up and leave the room without responding? Honestly, what will I say? What will you say? Now is our time! Now is your time! Through an intense nationwide Treaty education initiative, suitable for all age groups, we can accrue massive political influence, and through massive political influence, effect massive political change. This will only be achieved by opposing the spread of Activist Maori Treaty misinformation, and opposing Activist Maori psychological warfare. There is no other way to eliminate the curse of co-governance. Tinkering with co-governance and Maorification on the fringes, fiddling with it, will never cut it. We need cataclysmic reversal that can never be undone. Maori activists live in a bubble, with a deep seated delusion, that selfdetermination aka sovereignty would somehow launch the Maori people into a new age of plenty. Standing back, the social psychology driving all of this is quite simply of a primitive culture unable to adapt to a more advanced one. They hide this failure by attacking the “white” oppressive culture/thinking, as if “brown thinking” would release them from this oppression, resulting in some kind of new age of Maori renaissance. It's an illusion created by a deranged minority, the reality of which is nothing more than a mirage. It's just another example of the kind of flawed logic behind Maori failure to evolve, which apart from any democratic considerations, is the last thing this nation needs with regards its governance. The Maori hyperbole is pure fiction and it is time to bring it to a head. Both Labour and National are responsible for this racist rort that we are now subject to. They attempted gallantly and failed miserably. The Te Pati Party Maori are abetted by the Greens and Labour parties. Parliament is for the business of the nation, not for the pushing of the dreams of one racial group.

Remember Theodore Roosevelt, US President? (right) His quote below is about striving valiantly and daring greatly. Allow yourself to be motivated and guided by his great words. What it is, why it’s wrong, and why it must be stopped

“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming. Who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause. Who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

Theodore Roosevelt Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, April 23, 1910.

A FINAL WORD TO ALL MAORIS, NOT JUST ACTIVIST MAORIS If Maoris want to ‘revive their culture’ and ‘preserve their language’, as they say they do, all well and good. We applaud this. Seriously. No Kiwi would have a problem with this. I certainly don’t. But I say to Maoris, do it using your own money, on your own Marae, in your own time, in your own homes, not forcing it on everyone else, just as all the other 159 cultures who live in New Zealand have to do, and are doing very successfully. As to the issue of being denied 'rights'? As I have said, I can't think of one right that non-Maoris have that Maoris don't have. Not one. I challenge anyone anywhere to name one. Just one. In fact, Maoris have more rights than everyone else, and this is not right in a democracy. Te Tiriti mandates that we all have equal rights. No one would argue with this, except Maori radicals who insist / demand that Maoris have more rights than everyone else. Thus I applaud David Seymour's referendum. Re: your religious beliefs. If you believe the bones of dead relatives are alive under the ground, it is your right to believe this. No one would deny you this right. But don't use your beliefs to interfere with the lives of other New Zealanders who don't believe what you believe. So how should we summarise?

Believe me, the Luxon, Peters, Seymour coalition has left the door wide open for a Maorification / co-governance 66

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

comeback. As I said, that this is so, is squarely Luxon’s fault. The Greens, Labour, and Te Pati Maori will be back. It’s just a question of when, not if. What would ‘expunging’ co-governance look like? I have listed some of these on the inside front cover, but just to re-iterate, here they are again. 1. Repeal all race-based legislation. Treat all the 160 cultures living in New Zealand equally. The Treaty mandates this. 2. Outlaw co-governance, not just tinker with it, re-arranging the deck chairs 3. Abolish the Maori seats (i.e. remove racism) 4. Remove all provisions that require public servants to learn Te Reo (i.e. remove racism) 5. Remove all Te Reo from public signage.(i.e. stand against cultural reprogramming) 6. Remove all Te Reo from public documents (i.e. stand against cultural reprogramming) 7. Enforce payment of rates on Maori land so that they share the cost of the facilities that councils provide for all landowners.(i.e. remove racism and apartheid) 8. Return to the original intent and meaning of the Treaty in Maori. (i.e. stand against Treaty misinformation) 9. Ensure that no ethnic group gets any sort of preferential medical treatment. 10. Remove all special Treaty of Waitangi provisions from our statutes (i.e. remove racism) 11. Ensure that no special provisions for co-governance are introduced. (i.e. stand against apartheid and racism) 12. Repeal all existing co-governance arrangements.(i.e. remove racism and apartheid) 13. Hold a referendum on the names of our country, islands and cities. (i.e. restore democracy) 14. Change all government department names back to English to remove the current state of confusion.(i.e. stand against cultural re-programming) What it is, why it’s wrong, and why it must be stopped

15. Remove any form of compulsory teaching of Te Reo from schooling at all levels (i.e. stand against cultural re-programming) 16. If the government wants to work in partnership with private sector groups or entities, and enter into contracts with them, for goods and services, they must be tendered out to all the 160 cultures in New Zealand, not simply gifted to Maori. (i.e. stand against apartheid and racism) 17. Launch compulsory character education in schools. Click HERE for details. 18. Completely re-write the new ideologically slanted history curriculum so that it tells the truth about our history. (i.e. stand against cultural reprogramming) 19. Write 1-18 above into a new constitution so that they can never be reversed.

How to apply these 'corruption strategies' to any newspaper article, video, news item, or speech. Here again are the 18 strategies. 1. Spreading Treaty of Waitangi Misinformation 2. Verbal abuse 3. Frightening people: bullying, intimidation, threats 4. Shaming people, making them feel guilty, so that they have to say ‘sorry’ over and over 5. Eggshell mentality - dealing with Maori is like treading on eggshells. Deliberately, they make out that they are easily offended 6. Lying and Deceitfulness 7. Camel in the tent 8. Heavy manipulation 9. Playing the victim card 10. Grooming or ‘cultural re-programming’ 11. Talking over the top of people 12. Media collaboration 13. The Maorification of local councils 14. Radicalisation 15. Creating confusion 16. Making emotionally charged statements with no proof of their veracity 68

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TAKEOVER

17. Maoris demanding the sole right to interpret the Treaty. 18. Downplaying the reality of the situation + deflection. Whatever you are listening to, watching, or reading, number the statements made by whoever is speaking, assigning one of the Strategy numbers to each statement. Sometimes a sentence might have two or more strategies attached to it. Often this is the case. You'll quickly become an expert at detecting what is going on so that you, for one, won't be fooled / duped / sucked in. You'll become a smart savvy frog, climbing out of the hot pot.

If enough people do this, particularly MPs, we can undo all the damage done over the past 45 or so years and return to democracy, one person one vote, all votes of equal value, all people being treated equally. We'll see the end of apartheid, racism, and racial division. To do this would constitute a return to the original intention and meaning of the Treaty in Maori, Te Tiriti. So essentially, this is what David Seymour is doing with his proposed referendum. He is calling the country back to the original intention and meaning of the Treaty in Maori, as signed on the 6th of February 1840 at Waitangi.

We need to get behind David Seymour and make the referendum happen. Meantime, we must be busy about informing / educating the New Zealand public about what the Treaty actually says and means, and about these 18 Strategies, so that when the time to vote comes they will vote intelligently, and thus rightly. New Zealand used to be an incredible country. Not so now. It's worth fighting to get it back.

Please share this booklet with everyone everywhere. Copy this link: https://issuu.com/esisite/docs/the_psychology_of_ takeover_rejig?fr=xKAE9_zU1NQ Then send the link to everyone on your address book. Thank you!

What it is, why it’s wrong, and why it must be stopped

Download a really neat one page sheet of all the strategies, and start anaylysing videos and articles against the 18 Strategies! Click HERE to download it for free. Try and do one a day. You'll get good at it!

We are going to have this book printed and delivered to as many homes as possible. You can help us by chipping in for the cost of printing. The bank account number is : 12-3232-0016590-00 Small amount or large, every bit helps. Thank you so much.

CO-GOVERNANCE

Eventually, there will be a referendum on the Treaty in New Zealand. These booklets will help people vote intelligently and rightly. Buy some, and give them out to your friends, family, neighbours and people generally as you go about your day. Every booklet you give out could help a frog get out of the slowly heating pot. The mainstream media won’t tell Kiwis the truth about what’s going on with co-governance, so we have to go directly to the people. Your participation is vital. Take action now! These booklets are $2 each + courier fees and packaging. To order email julian@stopcogov.kiwi or phone 0274764430 Provide your name + email + physical address + phone number. We’ll do the rest. Now is the time to step up and take responsibility for our nation! If everyone does a little bit, a lot can be achieved. The e-book is packed with hyperlinks, giving you much more detailed information than what you have just read in your hard copy. To access the e-book, scan the QR code below. Help save New Zealand. Awareness is the key to change. Order these booklets To Register For News and Updates and To Donate visit Www.stopcogovernance.kiwi or bank 02-0261-0025679-000 To join the fight, visit Www.stopcogovernance.kiwi and sign up to receive 71

What it is, why it’s wrong, andblogs why it and mustupdates. be stopped daily Thank you.

CO-GOVERNANCE