Environmental Science & Engineering Magazine (ESEMAG) April 2016

Page 66

Water Supply

New options to consider for zebra mussel control By Rinita Banerjee

Z

ebra mussels were first discovered in Canada in 1988 and have become a well-established nuisance in the Great Lakes. Their rapid colonization rate and environmental resilience make them difficult to control. Zebra mussels can adhere to hard surfaces such as PVC, plastics and metal surfaces to form multilayer colonies (Griffiths et al, 1991). This results in blockage or reduced flow in pipes and water intake systems, leading to adverse long-term economic impacts. Various design techniques have been employed to control mussel infestation. The most common include a combination of chemical treatment and mechanical removal. However, concerns have been raised about the harmful effects on non-target aquatic species. continued overleaf...

Zebra mussel infestation results in blockage or reduced flow in pipes and water intake systems, leading to adverse long-term economic impacts. Photo courtesy Cottonwood County.

Technology

Advantage

Disadvantage

Usage

Chemical Oxidation

Widely used in the industry, readily available

Difficult to install and monitor, harmful to non-target aquatic species

Raw water intakes of Toronto’s water treatment plants and most GTA municipal lake based water supplies

Mechanical Removal

Simple and easy to administer, energy efficient

Labour intensive, must be repeated often to prevent buildup

Used extensively as a temporary fix

Thermal Treatment

High energy requirement

Causes damage to the ecosystem, must be repeated at least twice a year

Foul Release Coating

Different options available to suit site specific needs, long lasting

May be expensive, prone to corrosion and abrasion

Parker Dam Colorado- field test site

Low Frequency Magnetism

Highly effective, low maintenance requirements, not harmful to the lake ecosystem

Not readily available, needs electricity, expensive

US Steel Water Intake (Chicago) pilot test

Pulse Acoustics

High efficiency, not harmful to the lake ecosystem

Not readily available, needs electricity, expensive

Georgia-Pacific paper towel and tissue mill off the shore of Lake Champlain, NY- field test site

UV Light

Effective

Recommended for small systems, not efficient if water has high turbidity

Used in drinking water systems. Experimentally proven to kill zebra mussel veligers

Table 1. Different zebra mussel control technologies with their advantages and disadvantages. 66 | April 2016

Environmental Science & Engineering Magazine


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.