The European-Security and Defence Union Issue 37

Page 13

+++ Trade Agreement +++

The world’s largest free trade zone Photo: ©Kalyakan - stock.adobe.com

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) by Hartmut Bühl, Publisher, Paris

T

rade deals do not only have an economic impact. They also have a geopolitical aspect, cultural outcomes and often prepare a reordering of regional alignments, mostly creating All in all, the pact is a significant achievement between counstability. tries which are extremely diverse in nearly all areas, but they On 15th November 2020, the fifteen countries of the Regional were showing a high level of flexibility in the negotiations. An Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) held a solemn example is that tariff schedules extend to at least 20 years. virtual signing ceremony, creating the world’s largest free In another important area however, they stood shoulder to trade area stretching from the southern borders of Kazakhstan shoulder by agreeing on one single set of rules of origin for in the North to the South Pacific, including New Zealand. all goods. This is the first time that China has signed up to a Negotiations over the RCEP started in 2012 and were concludregional multilateral trade pact, having already some bilateral ed by the ten ASEAN countries1 as well as Australia, China, trade agreements in the region. And the RCEP is also the first Japan, New Zealand and South Korea. trade pact that includes China, Japan and South Korea. Members of the RCEP make up The main effect of this regional pact is to have wonearly a third of the world’s ven the various trade agreements of the Associapopulation and account South Korea tion of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) with for nearly 30 % of GlobJapan China the five other countries of al Gross Domestic the Indo-Pacific region into a Product (GDP). Countries participating single framework. The deal excludes the Myanmar in the RCEP Vietnam The western world mostly United States because Laos Thailand sees the pact as an extenof its withdrawal from Philippines Cambodia sion of China’s influence in the region the Trans-Pacific PartnerMalaysia Brunei Singapore and likely to boost the total Gross ship (TPP) negotiations at the Indonesia Domestic Product (GDP) of RCEP initiative of the newly elected Member States. US President in 2017, expressing The European Union’s first his doubts on globalisation which might impression of the RCEP was not be advantageous to his country. The Australia expressed by the EU High Repremaining members went on multilaterally in form resentative/Vice President of of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement the Commission, Josep Borrell, for Trans-Pacific-Partnership (CPTPP)2. The RCEP also New Zealand who said: “The Indo-Pacific shows that globalisation is not dead and China’s graphic: ESDU, using Negoworks, region is of strategic imporPremier, Li Keqiang, praised the RCEP deal as “a victory of stock.adobe.com tance to us. We must enhance multilateralism and free trade”! our engagement to make sure our voice is heard and the India, also party to the negotiations, pulled out last year on overall structure of regional cooperation remains open and somewhat nationalistic decision, but the RCEP is keeping its rules based. ” door open for India, whereas it is closed for the US – at least for the time being.

First impressions of the RCEP There is no doubt that the RCEP will boost economic integration and influence member countries’ future trade policies. The Pact includes commitments in goods, services, investment, competition and last but not least, e-commerce. Standards, intellectual property rights and dispute settlement mechanisms have also been agreed.

1 The Association of Southeast Asian Nations ASEAN) was founded on 8th August 1967 and has actually 10 members: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, and 2 Observers (Papua New Guinea and Timor Leste). Objectives: economic growth and to stimulate regional peace and stability based on the rule of law and the principle of United Nations. 2 The CPTPP is a trade agreement between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam, which entered in force on 30th December 2018. The treaty evolved from the Trans-Pacific-Partnership (TPP) which never entered in force because of the withdrawal of the US in 2017.

13


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Documentation Speech of NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană

3min
pages 46-48

Jacques Favin-Lévêque, Versailles Military mobility – vital for European defence More than a symbolic project

3min
page 45

Ruy Pinto, Luxembourg Connecting the world through satellite Vital support for critical healthcare services

3min
page 44

Fred Stoof, Borkheide Cutting-edge technologies for the security of armoured civil vehicles Adaptable to all missions

4min
pages 42-43

Patrick Bellouard, Paris The impact of Covid-19 on European defence Defence is no longer taboo

7min
pages 40-41

General Eberhard Zorn, Berlin

6min
pages 38-39

Interview with François Bausch, Luxembourg Luxembourg’s strong commitment to the EU and NATO Enlarging the security concept

9min
pages 34-37

Hartmut Bühl, Paris The Common Annual Review on Defence (CARD) New opportunities for the European defence landscape

7min
pages 30-32

Michael Gahler MEP, Brussels/Strasbourg Towards a European Defence Union Maintaining momentum

6min
pages 26-27

Frédéric Mauro, Brussels European defence forces versus European army Words in the wind

7min
pages 28-29

Brigadier General (FRA-F) Jean-Marc Vigilant, Paris A European war college, an opportunity for European defence? Time for a European strategic culture

3min
page 33

Arie Egozi, Tel Aviv stabilise the Middle East? Far away from peace in this region

6min
pages 24-25

Professor Hideshi Tokuchi, Tokyo Maintaining the rules-based international order in the age of the US-China rivalry Keep the US engaged

3min
page 23

Interview with Cyrille Schott, Strasbourg “The critical mind is also free in its thinking about religions” Our freedom is an inalienable right

10min
pages 14-17

Hartmut Bühl, Paris Commentary: What defence for Europe? For a dispassionate debate on nuclear deterrence

4min
page 20

General (ret.) Harald Kujat, Berlin Back to normal transatlantic relations The impact of the US election on Europe

5min
pages 21-22

Nicola Beer MEP, Strasbourg/Brussels Is the German presidency succeeding to consolidate the Union and reinforce the European institutions? A critical view from the European Parliament

9min
pages 10-12

Cyrille Schott, Paris Security and defence, both interdependent sides of the same coin The crisis ultimately moves the lines

6min
pages 18-19

Hartmut Bühl, Publisher, Paris The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Strategic and economic implications for the EU

3min
page 13

Josep Borrell, Brussels Concrete solutions for concrete challenges Towards a Strategic Compass for the EU

6min
pages 8-9

News, Nannette Cazaubon

5min
pages 6-7
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The European-Security and Defence Union Issue 37 by The European-Security and Defence Union - Issuu