Cosmic Cycles, Field Inversion, and Civilizational Shift (2024–2027)

Introduction In recently years, humanity appears to be at a crossroads marked by geopolitical con ict, unusual phenomena, and strains on institutions. From the Israel–Iran hostilities of June 2025 to a surge in of cial UFO (UAP) disclosure reports, these events can be viewed through the lens of a revolutionary framework developed in the Soviet Union by engineer Valerijs Černohajev during the 1980’s-1990’s and discovered following his death in 2019 by his daughter. The translated collection of these works along with scans of the original notes are presented in the 2024 book, Engineering In nity: Earth’s First Interstellar Blueprint. Černohajev’s work – organized into numbered “Work” chapters – proposes that human civilization is in uenced by cosmic cycles and energy “ elds,” leading to periodic eld inversions and shifts in civilizational charge polarity. In simple terms, he suggests that large-scale changes in our cosmic environment can ip the energetic balance of society, with profound psychological and societal consequences.

fi

fl

fl

fi

fi

fi

fi

fi

fi

fl

fl

fl

fi

fi

fl

fi

fi

fi

fi

fi

This summary explains how, according to Černohajev’s framework, the turmoil of 2025 ties into a larger pattern of civilizational change. We will explore the concepts of eld inversion and civilizational polarity, their connection to current events (like war and UFO sightings), and following the logic of the framework what it predicts for con ict,

fl

fi

fi

Cosmic Cycles, Field Inversion, and Civilizational Shift (2024–2027)

governance, technology, and consciousness between 2025 and 2027. Černohajev’s framework starts from a cosmic perspective. He posits that our Solar System’s journey through the Milky Way Galaxy – speci cally along the Orion Arm – exposes humanity to changing energy elds that in uence civilization’s development. In Work No. 6: Planetary-Lunar Cycles and Civilizational Development, he identi es certain points in our galactic orbit where the prevailing cosmic eld ips or resets – a phenomenon we can term a eld inversion.

One such critical juncture was predicted for the year 2024, when the Solar System would cross a “zero point” in the Orion Arm. According to Černohajev, this crossing in the 2024 summer solstice represented an inversion or neutral zone in the galactic environment. Just as a magnet’s polarity can reverse when passing through a zero eld region, a similar reversal in the informationalenergy eld surrounding Earth was anticipated. In practical terms, this means the cosmic background in uence on human society would shift in orientation around that time.

What effects would a galactic eld inversion have? Černohajev’s framework suggests that the very “ eld” of human civilization’s consciousness and behavior is tied to cosmic electromagnetism and gravity.

When the Solar System moves into a new eld con guration, it can alter the subtle

forces affecting human psyches and even the stability of institutions. The 2024 “zero point” crossing was seen as heralding a broad transition: old patterns would begin to break down and new ones emerge. Indeed, Engineering In nity presents a mathematical model of history that shows regular cycles and sudden pivots in society’s trajectory.

The data indicated that after 2024, all major powers and cultures would experience marked changes in direction, implying a global phase shift rather than isolated events. In Černohajev’s view, this is not coincidence but the result of entering a different section of the galactic eld – essentially, the cosmic environment “inverts” its in uence, pushing civilization toward a new evolutionary track.

Civilizational Charge Polarity (Yin–Yang of Society) A core concept in Černohajev’s framework is what might be called civilizational charge polarity – an analogy that treats the collective psyche of humanity as if it carries an electrical charge (positive or negative) that can dominate in different eras. In Work No. 1: Reverse Engineering GravitationalCharge Dualism…, Černohajev introduces the idea of Gravitational-Charge Dualism, unifying gravity and electromagnetism, and then extends this dualism to human society.

He argues that human consciousness and societies have a kind of excess “charge.”

Notably, he claims the psyche of human civilization currently holds an “excess negative charge,” which interacts with Earth’s own negatively charged eld to produce repeating cycles over time

fl

fi

fi

fi

fl

fi

fl

In simpler terms, our civilization has been dominated by a negative polarity – one could interpret this as an era of materialism, con ict, and imbalance – which, when combined with the surrounding environment, creates recurring patterns of turmoil (“a 5th cyclic diffraction pattern in Time” in Černohajev’s words.

This negative charge polarity in society can be thought of as analogous to the “Yin” force in Chinese philosophy, which represents darkness or passive energy. Černohajev explicitly ties his dualism framework to the ancient Yin–Yang concept: at the physical level, his gravitational-charge model “fully con rms…‘Yin and Yang’ (i.e., dark and light).”

By extension, a negatively charged civilization corresponds to an excess of “dark” energy – manifesting as fear, division, or aggressive competition – while a positive charge would align with “light” energy – manifesting as unity, compassion, and creativity. Importantly, Yin and Yang are cyclical and complementary. Černohajev’s civilizational cycles imply that a prolonged dominance of one polarity (e.g. negative/Yin) will eventually give way to the other polarity (positive/Yang) as a corrective inversion.

Thus, a polarity shift is built into the cycle of history.

In the late 20th and early 21st century, according to this framework, humanity has been under a negative charge dominance – evident in widespread social stress, con ict,

and a focus on material growth over spiritual or ethical development. The concept of civilizational charge polarity helps explain why global mood and behavior can shift when cosmic conditions change. At a eld inversion point (like the 2024 crossing), the framework suggests that the accumulated negative charge can begin to dissipate or ip, allowing the

positive charge to rise in in uence. This is essentially a re-balancing of the Yin–Yang energies on a civilizational scale. Černohajev’s works imply that such a shift would herald a new era of more positive orientation – but not without turbulence during the changeover, as we will see.

Psychological and Energetic Turbulence During Transition If the cosmic eld and civilizational charge are changing, what does that feel like on the ground? Černohajev anticipated signi cant psychological and energetic consequences for humanity during the transition period around 2024–2025. In Work No. 6, which includes “The 2024 Prediction,” he foresaw a time of heightened tension and upheaval as the old polarity ghts to maintain control while the new polarity emerges. Speci cally, he described the years leading up to 2024 as a period of intense confrontation between two broad forces in society: •

On one side, the “ nancialoligarchic-militaristic capital” forces – essentially the established power structures driven by wealth, military might, and top-down control.

This represents the old paradigm (we can associate it with the negative charge polarity: competitive, hierarchical, and often coercive).

fi

fi

fi

fi

fl

fl

fi

On the other side, the “people’sdemocratic-moral development” f o rc e s – e m e rg i n g g r a s s r o o t s movements emphasizing democracy, social justice, ethical development, and the collective good. This aligns with the nascent positive polarity,

fi

fi

fl

•

focusing on humanistic and moral progress into the future. Černohajev noted that this confrontation would occur “in conditions of psychological and natural cataclysms.” In plainer language, the stress of this polarity struggle would coincide with mental-health crises and social unrest (psychological cataclysms), as well as physical disruptions like natural disasters or environmental crises. One might interpret this as the world appearing to go a bit “crazy” or chaotic during the shift – a mix of con icts, protests, institutional failures, and perhaps climate or earth disturbances adding to the turmoil.

We can see real-world parallels to this description. The early 2020s have indeed been marked by psychological strain (for example, the global anxiety and disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath) and by natural disasters intensi ed by climate change. Socially, there’s a clear tug-of-war between authoritarian, wealth-centered politics and populist or progressive movements in many countries.

Systemic institutional breakdowns – such as erosion of public trust in governments, international organizations struggling to

address con icts, and economic instabilities – also characterize this era. According to Černohajev’s framework, these struggles are not isolated incidents but interconnected symptoms of the same underlying transition.

The old “negative charge” institutions ( nancial and militaristic power structures) are under stress and beginning to lose their grip, resulting in dysfunction or crises.

Meanwhile, new paradigms are not fully in place yet, which creates a volatile gap. This is the turbulence one expects when a system is changing its fundamental orientation.

As an example, consider the Israel–Iran con ict in June 2025. This con ict, a severe military confrontation in an already tense region, can be seen as part of the larger pattern of upheaval. It re ects the lingering in uence of the old polarity – geopolitics driven by power struggles and fear – persisting even as the world’s energy is supposedly shifting. Černohajev’s timeline had predicted major transitions around 2024, but “old guard” forces often are up violently when threatened. The Israel–Iran war in 2025 exempli es such a are-up of militaristic energies. Rather than viewing it in isolation, Černohajev’s perspective frames it as one battle in a broader psychological war between

old and new societal forces during this period of eld inversion. Likewise, other con icts and crises in the mid-2020s (whether political polarization in various countries or economic shocks) form part of this turbulent transition environment.

Energetically, Černohajev’s concept of an information-energy eld means that human consciousness is in uenced by the energy it “swims” in. During a eld inversion, the background energy is in ux, which could lead to erratic behavior, confusion, or bursts of creativity and insight among the population. Many people may feel destabilized or emotionally charged without fully understanding why – this could manifest as social unrest or mass psychological phenomena. On the ip side, some individuals or groups might experience sudden awakenings, shifts in values, or innovative ideas as they tap into the emerging positive polarity. In sum, the transition period is a double-edged sword: it is chaotic and challenging, but it also contains the seeds of profound change and renewal. Černohajev’s framework treats this turbulence as a necessary phase for civilization to “ ip” into a new state.

The 2024–2025 Turning Point: From Intellectual to Spiritual Civilization

fl

fl

fl

fl

fl

fl

fl

fi

fl

fi

fl

fl

fi

fl

fi

fl

fi

One of Černohajev’s bold claims is that around 2024, humanity would begin a major transformation in consciousness – a shift he describes as moving from an “Intellectual Civilization” to a “Spiritual Civilization.”

This doesn’t mean abandoning intellect, but rather a change in what drives our society at

the deepest level. Up until this point, our global civilization has been dominated by intellectual-psychological development (often tied to material advancement and rational exploitation of nature). The next phase would emphasize spiritual-ethical development (prioritizing harmony, wisdom, and the

collective well-being). In Work No. 6, Černohajev pinpoints 2024 as the in ection point: “In 2024 there will occur a ftyp e rc e n t t r a n s i t i o n f ro m i n t e l l e c t u a l civilization (psychological level) to spiritual civilization (at psychological level).” In other words, about half of humanity (by his estimation) would start embracing a new, more spiritually oriented outlook around that year, tipping the balance of global culture.

The use of “50%” suggests a critical mass where the new mindset reaches enough people to in uence the direction of civilization.

This prediction is framed by the cosmic event mentioned earlier – the Solar System crossing the Orion Arm’s neutral zone ( eld inversion point). Černohajev correlates that astronomical milestone with an inner human milestone. As we cross into a new galactic environment, the framework asserts that the “charge” of civilization ips towards positive, enabling a widespread change in consciousness. What might this look like in everyday life? We could expect to see greater interest in topics like mindfulness, holistic well-being, ethics in technology and business, and unity across cultural divides. Early signs of this are observable: global youth-led movements for climate action and social justice, a growing acceptance of mental health and spiritual practices, and even renewed dialogue between science and spirituality.

These trends align with the idea of a spiritual civilization emerging.

fi

fi

fl

fi

fi

fl

fl

fl

Černohajev’s Work No. 10, The Tripartite Nature of Human Consciousness and Cosmic Cycles, further elaborates on how human consciousness is composed of three components – intellect (mind), spirituality (soul/heart), and material DNA (body) – and how each era of history emphasizes one over the others. The current transition can be seen as a re-balancing of these components.

For centuries, the intellectual and material aspects (thinking and building in the material world) dominated, often suppressing the spiritual aspect. The post-2024 era, according to the framework, begins to restore the spiritual component to prominence, aiming for a more holistic balance. Černohajev even notes that this progression follows regular cycles tied to celestial movements, suggesting the shift is natural and timed by cosmic rhythms. In essence, the civilizational “charge” that was negative (materialintellectual heavy) will swing toward positive (ethical-spiritual heavy) as a part of a cosmic schedule.

During 2024 and 2025, as this turning point unfolds, we can identify contrasting examples of the two paradigms. On one hand, we have continuing strife and fear-driven narratives (e.g., con icts like the one between Israel and Iran, or great-power rivalries) which are holdovers of the Intellectual/Militaristic civilization. On the other hand, we see extraordinary moments of global unity or awareness – for instance, international cooperation in science (such as sharing data openly, or collaborative missions to space), or widespread humanitarian support during crises.

One interesting real-time example in 2025 is the increase in UFO/UAP (Unidenti ed Aerial Phenomena) reports and government disclosures. Super cially, military UFO sightings might seem unrelated to spirituality; however, the very act of major governments openly discussing mysterious aerial objects breaks a longstanding taboo and could indicate a crack in the old paradigm of secrecy and top-down knowledge control. It also sparks the public’s imagination about life beyond Earth and advanced technologies, topics that can expand consciousness.

represent the tail end of the “confrontation period” Černohajev described.

Černohajev’s framework provides a broad canvas for imagining the near future. Based on his concepts, we can logically extrapolate some potential outcomes in key areas between 2025 and 2027, as the eld inversion effects deepen and the new polarity takes hold. These are speculative interpretations a l i g n e d w i t h E n g i n e e r i n g I n n i t y ’s perspective, presented objectively:

We should also consider geopolitical realignments. Černohajev’s cycles indicated that after 2024, the trajectories of major powers change signi cantly. This could mean that nations like the United States, China, Russia, and those in Europe reassess their roles. Unexpected alliances focusing on global issues (climate action, anti-poverty, disaster response) might form, cutting across the old East-West or North-South divides.

Con ict and Geopolitics (Struggles before Resolution)

fl

fi

fi

fi

fl

fi

fi

fi

fl

fl

fl

fl

fi

fl

In the domain of con ict, the years 2025– 2027 are likely to remain volatile but trend toward resolution as the old energy dissipates.

The lingering con icts (such as the Israel– Iran war of 2025 or other regional tensions)

fl

fi

Černohajev’s work is deeply involved with UFO technology – Work No. 2: Reverse Engineering UFO Propulsion Systems details designs for advanced propulsion using plasma and magnetism – implying he took UFO phenomena as real and technically understandable. The surge in UAP interest around 2024–2025 might be seen as part of the revelation of hidden knowledge that comes with the civilizational shift. As the new eld in uence grows, humanity may be ready to learn and accept formerly esoteric or suppressed knowledge (whether about energy physics, extraterrestrial life, or consciousness itself). In fact, Černohajev wrote that after passing the critical point (Point 6), “ancient wisdom, science, and knowledge encompassing physics, ethics, and energy” becomes attainable to civilization. This suggests that breakthroughs in understanding – integrating spiritual wisdom with advanced science – are a hallmark of the post-2024 spiritual civilization.2025–2027 Outlook: Con ict, Governance, Technology, and Consciousness

Initially, we might see an escalation of certain con icts – a nal intensi cation of militaristic impulses. This could manifest in new military standoffs or the deepening of existing ones, as factions rooted in fear and power struggle react strongly to the changing world. However, as the new spiritual orientation gains momentum, these con icts may lose support and momentum. Public opinion globally could swing against war and violence more strongly than before, pressuring leaders to seek diplomatic solutions.

By 2027, it’s plausible (through Černohajev’s optimistic lens) that we’ll witness breakthrough peace efforts or treaties resolving some of the major standoffs. The energy for con ict diminishes as the civilizational charge turns positive; wars literally become “out of phase” with the spirit of the times.

Conversely, some traditional alliances based purely on economic or military interest might weaken if they don’t t the new values. One could imagine, for instance, regional rivals nding common ground under public pressure to avoid destruction. The process will not be smooth – there may be power vacuums and crises of leadership. But by 2027, the framework implies a trend toward de-

Governance and Institutional Change The systemic institutional breakdowns observed in the early 2020s are likely part of a larger transformation of governance. As the eld inversion progresses, existing institutions – governments, nancial systems, international bodies – face a choice: adapt to the new paradigm or continue to crumble.

In Černohajev’s view, ethical and peoplecentric forces will gain in uence, so we can expect governance to gradually become more transparent, inclusive, and responsive to citizens. Between 2025 and 2027, this might take the shape of reforms and possibly entirely new frameworks of cooperation. For example, we might see the emergence of new global agreements that prioritize humanitarian and ecological values, lling the gaps left by old systems. The United Nations and other global institutions could undergo pressure to democratize or could be complemented by novel networks of cities, communities, and organizations working together in novel ways.

At the national level, many countries could experience political turnover or reform movements. Governments that embodied the “ nancial-oligarchic” model may face public reckonings – perhaps through elections, legal challenges, or grassroots uprisings demanding change.

fl

fi

fl

fi

fl

fi

fl

fi

Indeed, the period around 2024–2025 has seen rising public discontent with corruption and authoritarian tendencies in many places. Černohajev’s timeline suggests that by embracing the new positive charge (aligned

fi

fi

escalation: global con ict indicators could be on the decline as humanity collectively turns towards reconstruction and healing after the storm.

with moral development), societies will start correcting these issues. Thus, by 2027 we might see more representation of younger, reformist leaders, and policies that re ect long-term ethical considerations rather than short-term gains.

This doesn’t mean a utopia overnight – governance could be chaotic in transition, including possible interim failures (government shutdowns, economic recessions, etc.). But those failures are part of shedding old skins. In Work No. 6, the prediction implied a “global transition” affecting all powers, which we can interpret as a worldwide governance shake-up with a generally positive direction (toward “people’s-democratic” values).

Institutionally, one might also consider the economy and nancial systems. A civilizational eld inversion might coincide with shifts in economic paradigms – potentially a move away from extreme inequality and unsustainable growth models, towards something more equitable or community-oriented. By 2027, possibly experiments in alternative economics (local currencies, cooperative ownership, universal basic income trials, etc.) will have gained traction as old systems face legitimacy crises.

The energetic consequence of the polarity shift is that systems built on exploitation and fear become energetically unsustainable – they “vibrate” at the wrong frequency, so to speak, and start to falter. New systems that resonate with cooperation and fairness stand a better chance to ourish. In summary, expect a period of institutional soul-searching and restructuring in these years, as governance catches up with the evolving consciousness of the populace.

Technology and UFO Phenomena Technology is a fascinating area where Černohajev’s ideas and current events intersect. On one hand, technology can be wielded by the old paradigm (e.g. surveillance systems, advanced weaponry), but on the other hand, it can be the key to unlocking the future (clean energy, connectivity, even cosmic exploration). Černohajev’s technical works (like Work No. 2 and Work No. 4 on UFO propulsion) imply that humanity has the potential to make quantum leaps in technology by applying new physics principles.

The period 2025–2027 could be ripe for such leaps, especially if the integrated “EnergeticAncient knowledge” becomes accessible post-2024. In practical terms, we might anticipate breakthroughs in energy technology – for instance, progress in nuclear fusion or novel energy generation methods inspired by principles similar to those Černohajev discussed (magnetohydrodynamics, plasma reactors, etc.). If these ideas move from fringe to mainstream, they could revolutionize how we power our civilization, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and diminishing one root cause of con ict.

fl

fl

Another intriguing aspect is the UFO/UAP narrative. By 2025, governments (notably the United States) have begun openly talking about unexplained aerial phenomena, something unheard of a decade prior.

According to our framework, this openness could continue and even accelerate. We might see greater disclosure of information regarding UFOs or even the introduction of advanced aerospace technologies that were previously kept secret. Černohajev’s work essentially attempts to reverse-engineer a UFO – implying he saw or had access to such technology.

Thus, one could speculate that between now and 2027, some form of exotic technology (propulsion systems, materials, or energy devices) will be revealed or demonstrated to the public. Whether this comes as a government admission, a private sector innovation, or an academic breakthrough is hard to predict, but the timing would align with a civilization ready to take a leap in knowledge. The increasing UFO reports might be preparing the public consciousness for a paradigm where faster-than-sound craft or even the presence of non-human intelligence is not dismissed as fantasy.

Embracing this possibility expands humanity’s sense of the possible – a clear aspect of a consciousness shift.

It’s important to note that technology in the new paradigm would be coupled with ethics. Černohajev’s notion of uniting physics, e t h i c s , a n d e n e rg y m e a n s t h a t a n y technological advancement is ideally guided by spiritual wisdom. So, while the late 2020s could bring amazing tech (AI developments, space travel milestones, medical breakthroughs via biotechnology, etc.), there will also be a strong call to use these responsibly. Already we see early signs: debates on AI ethics, data privacy, and sustainable tech are intensifying.

By 2027, society may implement stronger ethical governance for technology (for example, an international agreement on AI or gene editing, in uenced by a more spiritually conscious public). In summary, technology is likely to be a central arena where the old and new values clash and then integrate – yielding potentially dramatic advances that align with the needs of a transitioning civilization.

Consciousness and Culture Finally, the most transformative changes predicted are in the realm of consciousness

and culture. As half of humanity moves toward a more “spiritual” civilization starting in 2024, the cultural landscape between 2025 and 2027 should re ect this awakening in myriad ways. We can expect a renaissance of sorts in human thought, with greater emphasis on meaning, connection, and the exploration of consciousness itself.

Practical outcomes might include: a rise in interdisciplinary studies linking science and spirituality, a boom in meditation and mindfulness practices worldwide, and perhaps new social movements that focus on inner development (sometimes termed a “consciousness revolution”). People may b e g i n t o id e n tif y le s s w ith n a r r o w nationalistic or ideological labels and more with global or even cosmic perspectives – viewing humanity as a single family on a shared planet. This aligns with the energetic notion that we exist in an informationenergy eld that doesn’t respect man-made borders.

One potential development is the normalization of experiences and topics that were once fringe: for example, open discussion of near-death experiences, psychic phenomena, or the idea of consciousness beyond the brain. As the eld inversion opens minds, such subjects might gain serious attention from researchers and the public. The arts and media could also evolve, producing content that re ects deeper existential questions and optimistic visions of the future, rather than the dystopias that dominated early 21st-century imaginations.

fi

fi

fl

fl

fi

fi

fi

By 2027, the cohort of young adults (many of whom came of age around 2024) may carry noticeably different attitudes – prioritizing community, purpose, and balance, where previous generations prioritized growth and competition. This generational shift would accelerate the cultural change. It’s worth

mentioning that Černohajev’s framework doesn’t imply everyone instantly becomes enlightened. During these years, psychological challenges will still be present.

In fact, many individuals might struggle to adjust, experiencing confusion or clinging to old worldviews. Society could temporarily split into groups moving forward and those trying to go backward. But the general trajectory points to healing. For instance, mental health might improve on the whole by 2027 as societies invest more in well-being and as people nd greater meaning in their lives.

Concepts like the collective consciousness could gain traction – the idea that humanity’s shared thoughts and feelings matter. In Work No. 5 and No. 6, Černohajev spoke about consciousness- eld interactions and cyclical development of civilizations, essentially framing history as an interplay of cosmic forces and human free will. The coming years would validate this perspective if we see a clear before-and-after in how people think and relate. By the end of 2027, one might look back at 2020 and be astonished at how much has changed in values and awareness in just a few years – a change as signi cant as the difference in atmosphere between, say, the late 1960s and the early 1950s, but compressed in time.

Conclusion In summary, Valerijs Černohajev’s works offers an intriguing, holistic lens to interpret the dramatic events of our time. It links the seemingly unconnected threads of war, UFO sightings, and institutional crises to deep cosmic and energetic patterns.

Field inversion in this context is more than a magnetic ip; it is a turning of the tide in the invisible forces that shape human civilization.

Civilizational charge polarity describes whether our collective spirit skews towards a “negative” (con ictual, materialist) or “positive” (cooperative, spiritual) state – and Černohajev asserts that we are in the midst of a historic ip from the former to the latter.

The psychological and energetic consequences of this shift explain why the mid-2020s feel so tumultuous: we are effectively undergoing a rebirth, and birth is not a gentle process.

For the general reader, the key takeaway is that the crises and anomalies we see in the news might be part of something larger and more hopeful. While con ict (like the Israel– Iran war) and confusion (like the UFO/UAP debates or failing institutions) dominate headlines, Černohajev’s framework suggests these are the labor pains of a new civilization coming into being.

The years 2025 to 2027 are likely to be pivotal in this story – a time when, if the framework holds true, humanity begins to stabilize in a new orientation. We would see con ict giving way to collaboration, secretive technology emerging for the common good, and a cultural shift towards interconnectedness and ethical consciousness.

All this is detailed in his works not as fanciful prophecy, but as the natural outcome of cycles and forces as real as gravity. Whether one subscribes to the details or not, the framework provides a neutral, big-picture narrative that connects dots across science, history, and spirituality.

fi

fl

fl

fi

fl

fi

fl

fl

fl

In the end, Černohajev’s framework is one of balance and integration. Just as Yin and Yang alternate but complete each other, our civilization may be balancing its intellect with

spirit, its darkness with light. The concept of engineering “in nity” re ects engineering not just machines, but a future where human potential is unlimited once aligned with the fundamental forces of the cosmos.

The public can take from this a sense that our turbulent times have purpose and direction.

These ideas resonate with a broader intuition: that humanity is on the cusp of a profound evolution – one that might nally harmonize our technology with wisdom, and our worldly actions with the deeper eld of consciousness in which we all reside. _____________________________________ Sources: Work No. 1: Reverse Engineering Gravitational-Charge Dualism Work No. 2: Reverse Engineering UFO Propulsion Systems Work No. 5: The Solar System and Consciousness-Field Interactions Work No. 6: Planetary-Lunar Cycles and Civilizational Development