Winter 2016
Templeton Financial Group
NATURAL GAS
5300 West Atlantic Ave Suite 612 Delray Beach, FL 33484 866-413-2974
Supply Templeton Financial Group feels most of Americas gas 5ields are now experiencing production declines. It appears that almost half of U.S. supply of conventional gas is in a terminal decline, at the same time shale gas is declining. Conventional gas supply has fallen 16.75 bcfd since July 2008. It looks like the increases in shale gas production more than offset those losses. Templeton believes, that is changing as of July 2016. We believe that conventional gas will continue to decline at about 5% per year because few companies are drilling those plays. Shale gas must, therefore, continue to grow by at least 15bcfd per year just to offset our forecasted annual conventional gas decline of 2.5bcfd and legacy shale gas production decline of 12.5 bcfd. Shale gas production replacement and growth for 2015 were 14.5 bcfd, down from almost 18 bcfd in 2014. In our opinion, it will be dif5icult to match 14.5 bcfd in 2016 because shale gas production has been falling 2.2bcfd annualized. Although additional reserves exist in other areas such as Barnett and F a y e t t e v i l l e , t h e s e p l a y s r e q u i r e substantially higher gas prices to be commercial.
The EIA forecasts that net dry gas production will increase 1.4bcfd in 2016 and 1.6bcfd for 2017. Even with this optimistic forecast , their data still shows that the U.S. will have a supply de5icit beginning in the last quarter of 2016. Templeton feels a more realistic forecast implies a potentially much greater de5icit and beginning sooner. A supply de5icit doesn’t mean we will run out. What is different now is that we feel the net imports will reach zero in early 2017 because of decreasing imports from Canada and increasing exports. Adding that challenge to the replacing of conventional gas depletion, and there is potentially much more serious supply problems than EIA’s forecast suggests.
FUTURES AND OPTIONS TRADING INVOLVE SIGNIFICANT RISK OF LOSS AND MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR EVERYONE. OPTIONS, CASH AND FUTURES MARKETS ARE SEPARATE AND DISTINCT AND DO NOT NECESSARILY RESPOND IN THE SAME WAY TO SIMILAR MARKETS STIMULUS. A MOVEMENT IN THE CASH MARKET WOULD NOT NECESSARILY MOVE IN TANDEM WITH THE RELATED FUTURES & OPTIONS CONTRACT BEING OFFERED. SEASONAL DEMAND AND CURRENT NEWS IN COMMODITIES ARE ALREADY REFLECTED IN THE PRICE OF THE UNDERLYING FUTURES.
[1]