Christmas Special
Pick the perfect present, find a festive frock and more page 13
Puzzles
THE COURI ER Monday December 12 2011
Sudoku
Easy
You can find ans week’wers to the this thecous puzzle s co.uk/rieronlineat puzzle . s
thecouriero Puzzles
nline. 38 c2.pu co.uk/puzzles Editor:zzles@ncl.ac.uk Laura Armit age
Yule Logs
Using a can you little LOGic (Chris work out tmas is the grid? which numb accep er shouonly ld replace table time for bad the ques tion mark jokes!), in the
Medium
Hard
Shape Up
Word Perfe ct
Each of the to the right different shap es below of the bottom are the sumgrid are the sum has a numerical shape? No of each colum of each value. The shape has numbers n. Can yourow and the numb a value less ers at the out than 1. work Enter thethe value of each solution into the empty grid.
How many from the words of four, five word TINSE and no letter L? No or six letters word. Apart may be used plurals or propecan you make words, but from TINSEL more than once r nouns allowed, itself, I have in an 20 should be your aim. found 25 individual different
Plus four-page puzzles pullout
C OURIER THE
thecourieronline.co.uk · Issue 1242 Monday December 12 2011
The Independent Voice Of Newcastle Students
Est 1948
Uni loses battle over animal testing
• 250,000 spent on legal fees Kat Bannon Editor
Following a lengthy legal battle costing £250,000 Newcastle University has been ordered to release governing licenses on their experiments on primates. The British Union of the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) �irst placed a Freedom of Information request (FOI) in June 2008, asking for details of the licenses held by researchers who conduct vivisection work on macaques. This was rejected by the University on the grounds that it would endanger staff and prejudice research interests. The University then embarked on a legal battle lasting over three years with the aim of protecting the information, which they claim for regulatory reasons is required to be kept con�idential. However, the University has now released the details to BUAV “solely as a result of a Tribunal order obliging it to so” after it noted the “strong public interest in animal welfare and in transparency and accountability” in relation to the animal experiments. “It is simply not true that the University is required to keep the licences con�idential.” said BUAV The Information Tribunal and Upper Tribunal
decided that the University was free to do whatever it liked, including FOI disclosure, with the information in the licences. The University has now abandoned its appeal to the Court of Appeal on this point, so clearly recognise it is without merit. There never was the slightest prospect that the Home Of�ice would prosecute the University for complying with a Tribunal order for disclosure premised on the fact that no criminal offence could be committed by the University by complying with a FOI request.” The papers BUAV requested contain details of two licenses granted by the Government to University researchers for projects, which required some work with primates. The work was aimed at increasing understanding of brain function and to potentially �ind treatment for ADHD and other attention and learning disorders. The research has lead to over 20 papers being published, supporting efforts that could lead to new and better treatments in the future. Originally reported in The Courier in November 2010, BUAV logged a FOI after the publication of articles by three researchers documenting ‘highly invasive’ brain experiments on macaques. These experiments involved implanting electrodes into the animals’ Continued on page 4
The University’s treatment of macaque monkeys for medical research, similar to the one pictured above, has been questioned by BUAV