VOL. 8 ISSUE 233 • WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2016
www.edgedavao.net
EDGEDAVAO Serving a seamless society
P 15.00 • 20 PAGES WHO’S TO BLAME? Davao City Vice Mayor Paolo Z. Duterte presides over yesterday’s City Council session. The vice mayor has blamed councilor Maria Belen S. Acosta for the controversy surrounding the amendment of the City Land Use Plan (CLUP) removing the additional 10 percent area in subdivision for green spaces. Lean Daval Jr.
PAOLO BLASTS MABEL ON GREEN SPACE ROW By ARMANDO B. FENEQUITO JR.
D
abf@edgedavao.net
AVAO City Vice Mayor Paolo Z. Duterte yesterday blamed councilor Maria Belen S. Acosta for the controversy surrounding the amendment of the City Land Use Plan (CLUP) removing the additional 10 percent area in the subdivision for green space. “Nahimo ning issue because of councilor Mabel Acosta. Mao na akong nakit-an na rason maong isyu na even atong second reading aning amendment… Naa sa minutes sa session, there was no request for a deferment during the second reading (This became
an issue because of councilor Mabel Acosta. This is what I have seen because during the second reading of the amendment… the minutes of the session show that there was no request for deferment),” Paolo said in an interview yesterday after a closed door meeting with the councilors. The closed door meeting was done immediately after a privilege speech by Acosta, during which she had asked Ateneo de Davao University (AdDU) president Fr. Joel Tabora, SJ to speak on the matter. During the interview, Paolo said he had even asked
Acosta and councilors Antoinette Principe and Mary Joselle Villafuerte during the second reading to give their take on the amendment. He said none of the three made any objection. Paolo said it was only on the third and final reading that Acosta manifested her objection, saying she wanted the item deferred so she could invite civic groups that were not informed of the amendment. “Nganong wala man niya na gibuhat atong second reading na gipangutana man nako siya (Why did she not do that during the second reading
when asked her about it)?,” he said. Paolo said Tabora was also not informed that he had asked Acosta for her take on the amendment. He said he explained to Tabora that under house rules, an amendment is considered final once it is on third reading. “Dili na pwede i-debate, dili na pwede i-amend. Diretso na botohan immediately, mao na ang nakabutang sa house rules (There are no more debates, no more amendments. The only thing left to do is vote on it immediately. That is what
F PAOLO, 10
EDGEDAVAO Sports Go lifts DuCay quintet P14
Rody bares plans for PHL sports P15