None of the editorial or photographs may be reproduced without prior written permission from the publishers. East Park Communications Ltd would like to point out that all editorial comment and articles are the responsibility of the originators and may or may not reflect the opinions of East Park Communications Ltd. Correct at time of going to press.
As President of our local law society, it gives me great pleasure to write this, my first, bulletin piece as President.
The highlight of the Society’s calendar was our recent Dinner and Awards evening which was a resounding success. I hope you all enjoyed the evening and this bulletin is jampacked with photos which showcase the evening. It was heartening to see so many of you gather, reconnect, and celebrate the outstanding achievements within our community. The event was a testament to the dedication that define our Society.
The atmosphere was one of celebration as we recognised individuals who have contributed significantly to our legal community. Congratulations to all our award
winners—you all are an inspiration to us. I would also like to thank everyone who helped organise the event, as well as those who attended and supported their colleagues and award winners. Events like these remind us of the strength and vibrancy of our legal network.
In our increasingly digital world, the value of genuine personal connections cannot be overstated. Our Society thrives not only on professional excellence but also on the friendships and support networks that develop among our members. I encourage each of you to continue reaching out and engaging with one another—these relationships are the foundation of our collective success and wellbeing.
We must all be mindful of the most significant developments in our profession recently - the Mazur judgement. The judgement has sent shockwaves through the profession and made us all think about the different branches of our legal profession. Each branch has its strengths. Though the full ramifications are still unfolding it has affected a vast sector of our legal profession, it is essential that we remember to support all the branches of our profession and that we unite to be able to offer vital services to our clients.
Another very recent major change to be aware of is the recent loss of regulatory
authority by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). This shift marks a new era in the regulation of our profession, and while the transition may bring uncertainty, it also presents an opportunity for renewed focus on ethical standards and professional development. The Society will be monitoring these changes closely and will keep you informed as more details become available.
As we move forward, let us continue to support one another, uphold the highest standards in our work, and remain engaged with both the challenges and opportunities ahead. Northamptonshire Law Society is the heart of our local legal profession and it is vitally important that members engage and support us. The Society is always welcoming new members (so pass the message around) and would be pleased to hear if anyone wishes to join the Council. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have questions, suggestions, or simply wish to connect.
Thank you for your ongoing commitment to our Society and to each other.
Kind regards,
Laura Carter
President Northamptonshire Law Society
Northamptonshire Law Society Officers & Council Members 2025
President
Laura Carter
Vice President
Ika Částka
Immediate-Past President
Sarah Franklin
Honorary Secretary
Ika Castka
Honorary Treasurer
Jabeer Miah
Constituency Member
Steven Mather
Council Members:
Maurice Muchinda
Louise Tyler
Euan Temple
David Browne
Michael Orton-Jones
Lyndsey Ward
Oliver Spicer
Edward St John Smyth
Society Manager
Carolyn Coles
Northamptonshire Law Society
The Gatehouse, Stable Lane
Pitsford Northampton NN6 9NG
Tel: 01604 881154
Email: Sec.nls@outlook.com
All Council members should in the first instance be contacted through the Society Manager.
Northamptonshire
Commercial leases –possession dispute & related monetary claims.
Al Saleh & Anor v Croydon Estates Ltd [2025] EWHC 99 (KB) (22 January 2025)
Context
In late January 2024 the Central London Country Court heard the trial of the claim by the landlord Croydon Estates Ltd (CEL) regarding possession for commercial property together with claims for monetary orders. There were five defendants in the original case, two of which are now the appellants in the case discussed herein. The defendants were at one point or another during the term of the lease, a tenant or someone expected to pay the rent of the property. They were Mohamed Hussain Saleh Al-Anazi (D1), Persons Unknown (D2), Ammar Al Saleh (D3), Hoffman Estates Ltd (D4) and Swalih Ltd (D5). It was noted that D3 was a director of D4 from 10.06.18 to 1.12.19. D3 was also a director of D5 from 01.08.18 to 09.10.18 and again from 01.07.19.
The lease debated in this case ran from 23.12.13 to its expiry 24.3.21, a 7-year tenancy. The lease then continued with an alleged verbal agreement until the date of the judgment 30.04.24. Where it was found that the defendants had all occupied the property at a given time, and payments had been missed or paid by the incorrect parties due to D3 not being director of a certain company at a certain point in the lease to meet the informal agreements made with CEL.
CEL sought possession of the property at 190 Edgeware Road due the apparent arrears that were accrued during the period of the lease and subsequent informal agreements. The Judge found an
entitlement to possession by reasons of arrears and ordered monetary judgments against the appellants. D4 was ordered to pay £180,342.40 and D3 was ordered to pay £45,5151.40.
Overview
Al Saleh & Anor v Croydon Estates Ltd [2025] EWHC 99 (KB) (22 January 2025)*
This case concerned the dispute over possession of commercial property and the related monetary claims. The appellants, whom were among the defendants in the original trial against Croydon Estates Ltd, claimed that the Judge had mischaracterised payments made by the appellants and as such misdirected himself in his judgment. The Judge at the High Court considered whether there was an error in judgment from the lower court that would allow for an appeal to progress. The appellants failed to prove their case.
The Claim
The primary legal issues were centred around problems regarding the identification of the tenant during the relevant periods, the validity of the informal agreement alleged by the applicants and the alleged mischaracterisation and miscalculation of the arrears.
The appellants alleged that there had been a mischaracterisation of payments made in what the Judge titled ‘Phase 2’ (the date of expiry of the lease to the forfeiture). They claimed that the payments made included the arrears, and that the judge in the lower court was also wrong in his finding of who was the tenant during this phase, suggesting that the tenant was not D4 and was in fact D5 (Swalih Ltd), and that the payments made by D5 during phase 1 was enough to cover their apparent tenancy in phase 2.
The appellants also presented the estoppel argument that was never advanced to the at the original trial before the Judge. The appellants claimed that there was to be a new lease provided in the name of D5 as part of the informal agreement, there was never
doubt that the informal agreement was in place however the allocation of the tenancy into D5’s name was in fact inconsistent with the Judge’s finding on the evidence. However, the Judge in the appeal explained that there is no evidential foundation in which it could be said that the Judge should have found that their informal agreement had this additional content, and the payments agreed were not in any event made.
The Judgment
The Judge concluded that the decision before it in the lower court was undoubtedly correct and therefore considered there to be no circumstances for which he would grant a permission to appeal. The judge also found that none of the claims discussed Al Saleh (D3)’s liability who was found to be the tenant in Phase 3 and as such declared the original findings and conclusions decided by the lower court are to remain as such with Croydon Estates Ltd (CEL) granted possession of the property and Hoffman Estates Ltd (D4) and Ammar Al Saleh (D3) ordered to pay CEL £180,342.40 and £45,515.40, with provisions made for interest.
Implications
This case highlights the importance of having a clear and outlined lease wherein if there are to be lease assignments so different tenants can occupy a property during the term of the lease it is vital that it is clear and obvious who is occupying the property and who is to pay the rent during the term of occupation for the property at any given time and if you are to pay on behalf of the tenant (like in D3’s case paying on behalf of D4) this does not absolve you of having to pay the correct rent whilst you are in occupation (D3 failing to pay any rent from the date of the forfeiture of the lease to the date of the judgment).
This year’s awards event was held at the Delta by Marriott on Friday October 17th.
Firms from in and around Northamptonshire came together to celebrate the profession within the county.
The worthy winner of the heads and tales game- Adam
Rachel McGrath, CEO of Northamptonshire Community Foundation, addressing the guests regarding the work that they do within the community, and alongside NLS
For many years the Society has supported the Law Division of the University of Northampton by awarding a prize to the best performing student in their final year. The award recognises academic achievement and rather than applying rigid criteria, exercises a judgment to a worthy recipient.
“Lauren’s dissertation focused on the complex and sensitive issue of assisted dying and explored whether the continuing illegality of the practice in England and Wales is out of date in contemporary society. Her dissertation was exceptionally well researched, carefully argued, and strongly supported by literature. She engaged deeply with the core debates surrounding autonomy, human rights, and medical ethics, and examined how shifts in public opinion and international legal developments challenge the current position in England and Wales.
A few images taken from the pre dinner drinks reception
Top Table guests. Ika Castka, Michelle Foster, Rachel McGrath, Greg Hollingsworth Laura Carter
Hall
The President Laura Carter, delivering her presidential speech
Alongside her in-depth analysis of the domestic framework, Lauren also explored comparative perspectives from jurisdictions where assisted dying has been legalised. This provided a valuable context to highlight both the safeguards and challenges that other systems have faced, and allowed her to critically evaluate whether such approaches could be here.
Lauren’s dissertation was a testament to her dedication and eagerness to learn. She consistently brought fresh ideas and a wide range of sources to supervisory meetings, showing determination to refine her arguments and strengthen her conclusions. The resulting piece was thoughtful, balanced, and compelling, tackling a challenging topic with sensitivity and academic rigour”
The NLS Prize for Outstanding Academic Achievement (Best Undergraduate Dissertation) was awarded to Lauren Knights
Support Personnel of the Year
The judges were looking for displays of the following attributes from the candidates
• Going the extra mile to support their team
• Excellent standards of work
• Dedication to the role & profession
• Professional development
• Contribution to client relationships & business development
• Community contribution including pro bono work
The nominee’s creativity and energy underpin everything she does — from organising flagship events and managing campaigns to producing award-winning submissions and high-impact marketing materials. Nothing is too much troubleAlways calm under pressure and unflappable in a crisis, This nominee is the dependable team player colleagues turn to time and again. Like many ‘support staff’ their efforts can sometimes go unnoticed, and winning this award would mean the world to her.
The Winner of the Northamptonshire Law Society Support person of 2025 was presented to Naomi Boszeat- Edwards
Unfortunately, due to other commitments, Naomi was unable to attend the event, so her award was accepted by her colleague Kevin Rogers on her behalf.
Young Lawyer of the year- The Sarah Banner Award
Sponsored by Shoosmiths, presented by Elaine Seamark
The shortlisted nominees were
• Connor O’Dell
• Chloe Cooper
• Beth Kay
• Olivia Sullivan
• Tom Charteress
• Shakira Khan
As in previous years this category attracted a large entry and has proved very competitive with some extremely able and talented people making the shortlist. The awards give an opportunity for us to celebrate some of the best young and rising talent in the county.
All of the nominees were impressive in terms of the quality of work that they are undertaking and the regard with which they are held by their colleagues and clients, but this nomination paperwork really stood out in terms of their dedication to publicly funded work in a challenging area of the law. Their rapid professional development post-qualification was evident as is her empathy and care for clients in very difficult circumstances. Her commitment to pro bono and community-focused work is truly impressive, supporting vulnerable and marginalised people within our local community.
The Winner of the Northamptonshire Law Society Young Lawyer of the Year was Chloe Cooper
Chloe Cooper being awarded her award by Elaine Seamark, Shoosmiths.
Award Winners 2025
Large Firm of the Year
Sponsored by Anstee and Co, presented by
Caroline Anstee
The Judges were looking for examples of the following attributes:
• Training initiatives & accreditations in development (e.g. CQS)
• Growth in reputation
• Client appreciation & recognition
• Staff welfare & development programmes
• Client initiatives that set the firm apart from others
• Contribution to the legal community
• Recognition from other firms
• Exceptional contribution to the local community or public service
• Strong and dedicated commitment to pro bono work for the benefit of individuals or organisations in the local community
• Demonstrate commitment to supporting local causes and projects
This year the judges were looking for Firms who not only demonstrated exceptional legal skill, but also embodied a genuine commitment to the profession through innovative client service, engagement with staff initiatives, and a meaningful impact on the wider community. Special attention was paid to those who set themselves apart by leading local projects, or contributing to the reputation and development of their firm and the legal sector as a whole.
The Winner of the Northamptonshire Law Society Large Firm of the year was Wilson Browne
Large Law Firm of the Year, presented by Caroline Anstee, accepted by John Punni
Small Law Firm of the year
The Judges were looking for examples of the following attributes:
• Growth in reputation
• Client appreciation & recognition
• Client initiatives that set the firm apart from others
• Contribution to the legal community
• Exceptional contribution to the local community - taking part in local events and being a focal point for the community
• Strong and dedicated commitment to pro bono work for the benefit of individuals or organisations in the local community
• Demonstrate commitment to supporting local causes and project
• Development of niche area of law
This year, the winning firm stood out not only for its exceptional legal expertise but also for its unwavering dedication to the local community. Their innovative client initiatives, combined with a focused development in a niche area of law, have significantly enhanced their reputation within the legal sector. The judges were particularly impressed by the firm’s active participation in local events and its strong commitment to pro bono work, which has delivered tangible benefits to both individuals and organisations in the area.
And the Winner of the Northamptonshire Law Society Small Firm of the year was Motorsport Legal
Winner of Small Law Firm of the Year Motorsport Legal . Sarah Franklin accepting the award from Laura Carter
Lawyer of the year 2025
The Fiona Moore Award
Sponsored by Wilson Browne presented by Tom Warrender
The Society would like to thank Wilson Browne for their support of this award given in memory of Fiona Moore, a Past President of the Society and former partner at Wilson Browne.
The winning nomination stands out because of his impressive and longstanding commitment to pro bono work across a range of areas and in collaboration with the 3rd sector and universities. His energy and commitment to widening access to legal advice and access to working in the profession is evident in his work, including mentoring young lawyers of colour, supporting activities at regional universities, and setting up the Law Clinic as a lead in the collaborative partnership. He also has impressive testimonials evidencing his range of work in practice.
The Winner of the Northamptonshire Lawyer of 2025 was Jabeer Miah
Winner of the Solicitor of the Year – Jabeer Miah, presented by Tom Warrender, on behalf of Wilson Browne
Kerrie Laurie from Rainbows Charity delivering an emotional speech regarding the amazing services they offer families within the county.
Party Time!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Council wish to extend their thanks to their Patrons for their continued support and engagement, and to the individual firms who sponsored the award categories.
Many congratulations to all the nominees, and those shortlisted.
We look forward to celebrating with you all again 2026.
PATRONS
Hawson’s Accountants
Marsh
University of Northampton
Landmark information Group
Headline Sponsors- Review
SPONSORS
Wilson Browne
Shoosmiths
Anstee & Co
A massive thanks to all that came and supported. Well done to all for those who were nominated, shortlisted and to the winners .
Finally, many thanks to all of the patrons and sponsors who continue to support the Society.
Looking forward to celebrating with you all in 2026 !
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023: Impact of identification doctrine reforms on D&O insurance
In this article, we examine how changes to the identification doctrine impact organisations and what that might mean for directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance.
Changes to the identification doctrine Under English Law, a company is a separate legal entity capable of acting in its own right. A company is, therefore, capable of committing a crime, entering into a contract, or being negligent, even though it is inanimate. The identification doctrine is the legal means by which intent (for example, the intention to deceive, or to take money that isn’t yours) can be attached to a company or partnership as opposed to a natural person, for the purposes of prosecuting a crime that requires evidence of a state of mind, such as theft.
Historically, a company or partnership could only be held legally liable for crimes that require dishonest intent if prosecutors could identify a sufficiently senior individual, typically the highest ranking executives in a company, who could be said to represent the “directing mind and will” of the company, whose criminal conduct and state of mind could, therefore, be attributed to the company. This made it difficult for enforcement agencies to tie fraudulent acts to entities, particularly in large and complex organisations.
The Act changes this. With effect from 26 December 2023, the knowledge of any “senior manager… acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority” can be imputed to a company or partnership for the purposes of prosecuting a wide range of economic crimes. Prosecutors no longer need to find a guilty party who represents the “directing mind and will” of the
entity. This is a fundamental change to English law that will have far-reaching implications for all organisations operating in the UK.
Senior managers include anyone who plays a “significant role” in the decision making, management, or organisation of the activities, or a substantial part of the activities, of the company or partnership. Note that it is not a question of the title held by an individual, but the substance of their role. In a large organisation, this could include lots of regional directors, departmental heads, team leaders, or managers. This change applies to theft, fraud, false accounting, tax evasion, bribery, and other financial crimes. It will make it much easier to bring criminal prosecutions against companies and partnerships.
What does this mean for your D&O cover?
The changes outlined above are intended to make it easier for organisations to be prosecuted for economic crimes. This is likely to increase the number of investigations and prosecutions by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). SFO Director Nick Ephgrave made a point of saying that changes to the law introduced by this Act offer new tools to facilitate prosecutions. This creates a number of risk areas that might impact directors and officers, and in turn, their D&O cover.
In the event of an SFO investigation or prosecution, the following considerations apply:
Insured persons: The broadening of the people whose knowledge can be attributed to the company or partnership is likely to lead to an
increase in the SFO’s interest in such individuals in the event of a criminal investigation. This, in turn, increases the risk of them being named in a criminal prosecution or other legal action arising out of the allegations. Insureds should check their definition of insured person in their D&O policies to see if senior managers are covered by their policy, and if there are any restrictions or limitations on this cover. If in doubt, speak to your Marsh representative.
Defence costs: SFO investigations into organisations require individuals to provide evidence, for which they may well want or need legal representation, leading to Side A or B claims. Those individuals can (if they are not already) become targets for the SFO, if evidence points to their wrongdoing, which can lead to their incurring legal defence costs that may fall to be covered by the D&O policy.
As a reminder, Side B D&O insurance is intended to indemnify the policyholder where it has paid the defence or investigation costs, or other losses, incurred by a director or officer. Side A D&O insurance protects directors and officers when their organisation cannot or will not indemnify their costs or losses in the event of a claim.
Side A ramifications: In some situations, there may be a conflict between an organisation and an individual that an organisation views as a potential bad actor. This could arise if interests and defences between the organisation and the individual are not aligned. In such instances, an organisation may be able to negotiate a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with the SFO which effectively “settles” the organisation’s liability but not that of the individual.
The organisation may separately bring claims or make allegations against an individual relating to the subject matter of the investigation or carry out its own internal investigation. An organisation is unlikely to indemnify an individual’s legal costs in a potential conflict scenario. This is where having sufficient Side A D&O cover becomes particularly important, as well as cover for internal investigation costs.
Investigation costs: The SFO has also been given increased power under the Act to require disclosure before a formal investigation is opened. Policyholders should consider the
definition of investigation and similar or related terms in their D&O policies, and consider if they have sufficient protection, including for internal investigations arising from a regulatory inquiry of request for documents, and if there is cover available for preinvestigation costs.
Other claims: If an organisation is prosecuted by the SFO for economic crimes, or for failure to prevent fraud as discussed in our first article, the directors could face allegations by shareholders or other stakeholders that they have failed to take reasonable steps to conduct appropriate fraud
risk assessments or take adequate prevention measures. This is, therefore, a new risk area that could lead to claims under the D&O policy.
How Marsh can help
To establish whether your D&O policy provides sufficient protection given the increased legal and regulatory risks created by the Act, and how it would respond in the event of one of the claims set out above, please speak to your Marsh contact.
Zelda Pitman
Senior Client Executive, Management Liability, Marsh UK
Mazur and the conduct of litigation
Much has been in the legal press about the High Court’s judgement in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys, where Sheldon J said the Legal Services Act makes it clear that only regulated individuals can conduct litigation as it is a reserved legal activity. Non-authorised individuals can support litigation – as they do in other areas – but only an authorised individual, such as a solicitor, should be conducting litigation.
The Legal Services Board has approved a fast track application from CILEx Regulation to allow Legal Executives to obtain standalone litigation practice rights.
The Law Society and the SRA have issued guidance on this issue and basically say that the law has not been changed but clarification has been brought.
A person who is not authorised cannot carry on the conduct of litigation, notwithstanding that they are an employee or manager of an authorised firm and/or working under the supervision of an authorised person. However, the definition of the conduct of litigation is narrow and limited to formal steps in proceedings. For example, the issuing, filing and serving of applications and statements of case.
This means that much of the work involved in litigation can be carried out by nonauthorised staff – either as it does not amount to the reserved activity of the
conduct of litigation or as it falls within their role assisting an authorised person. This includes activities that take place prior to proceedings being initiated and will also generally include matters such as:
• the giving of general legal advice
• drafting pleadings, particulars of claim, applications and correspondence
• proofing witnesses, and drafting and signing statements of truth on witness statements
When considering who is responsible for the conduct of litigation this will be a question of fact and degree in each case.
Solicitors and firms will need to ensure that their processes and records demonstrate that appropriately authorised persons are exercising their professional responsibility for the key formal steps and strategic decisions in connection with proceedings initiated before the courts.
‘Tick-box’ oversight from an authorised person will not be sufficient.
Practical steps that firms can take towards compliance with the rules, include:
• reviewing policies and procedures to make sure these document the steps involved in litigation processes and who carries each of these out
• making sure that an authorised person is involved in each matter. Check that
the practising rights of the authorised person include the conduct of litigation and that they have the relevant technical skills and competences for the litigation in question
• making sure that those key formal trigger points which amount to the conduct of litigation are the responsibility of the authorised person. Document decision-making to demonstrate the professional judgement applied to these steps in the proceedings
• training all staff involved in litigation processes on the policies and procedures to be followed and the reasons for them and have suitable supervision and review processes in place to make sure that the policies and procedures are being followed in practice
Whilst Mazur has caused alarm within the legal community as firms have to rethink how their teams conduct litigation once the dust settles and processes are updated things may not be as bleak as they may seem to some.
12 months, WhatsApp has nearly doubled in popularity as a review method.
Collecting client feedback isn’t always easy, especially when your focus is on delivering specialist legal work. That’s why we’ve put together six practical tips tailored specifically for UK law firms, brought to you by ReviewSolicitors — the UK’s leading legal review platform.
1. Ask at the right time Timing is everything. Asking a client to leave a review at 5 PM on a Friday is unlikely to receive a response, but waiting six months after a case concludes is unlikely to work either.
With over 10 million reviews collected, ReviewSolicitors understands the optimal times to send out review requests. Our data shows that early afternoons on Mondays and Thursdays, and between 8 AM and 10 AM on Wednesdays and Thursdays, are the most effective times.
At ReviewSolicitors, we can integrate with your case management system to automate your review collection, ensuring your review requests are sent at the most effective times.
2. Make it easy for the client Clients expect flexibility. To maximise the number of responses, your law firm should offer multiple ways for clients to leave a review: email, QR code, SMS, WhatsApp, and even paper reviews for those less comfortable with technology. Over the last
We can equip your firm with all of these options — each fully automatable — so clients can choose the method that best suits them, and your team can stay focused on feeearning work.
3. Encourage a feedback-driven culture
Some clients will want to leave feedback for a specific individual. That’s why it’s important to create a culture where review collection is part of the everyday workflow for paralegals, solicitors, and partners.
Build a ‘review culture’ where outstanding team members receive positive recognition… and maybe even a public pat on the back!
ReviewSolicitors offers individual profiles for all clientfacing staff under your firm’s listing, helping boost trust, transparency, and team morale.
4. Respond to your reviews
Whether a review is positive or negative, your firm should aim to respond within four days. Prompt replies show clients that their feedback matters and that your firm is actively listening. It also encourages more clients to leave reviews, knowing they’ll be heard.
Our easy-to-use dashboard allows you to respond quickly and easily, often in seconds. If you’re short on time, we can even support you by crafting responses on your behalf.
5. Share your best reviews
With 89% of consumers checking online reviews (SRA, 2024), it’s crucial to showcase them prominently. Add reviews to your website and share them across your social media channels to highlight your expertise and client satisfaction.
At ReviewSolicitors, we make sharing your 4-star and 5-star reviews easy. We provide a legal-specific, customisable widget that effortlessly displays your best reviews on your website. Your reviews will also appear on page one when a potential client searches for your law firm on Google, improving your SEO and boosting your firm’s visibility.
We can also integrate with your social media (LinkedIn, Facebook, and X) to automatically post your best reviews.
6. Offer review collection via a third party Clients want to be heard and to help others make informed choices. Increasingly, they’re sharing their experiences on independent platforms, where their feedback feels visible and impactful.
Credibility and transparency matter: according to the SRA, over two-thirds of clients trust third-party review sites more than a law firm’s own website.
That’s why, when it comes to legal services, they turn to trusted platforms like ReviewSolicitors — the UK’s leading site for verified law firm reviews.
Ready to improve your review collection?
We’d love to hear how your law firm currently gathers client feedback and to show you how we can help enhance your review collection process.
Get started today at: www.reviewsolicitors. co.uk/joinup
Or reach out directly to Adam Hall: adam. hall@reviewsolicitors.com
Part of the wider community –an HCR perspective
Community and connection lie at the heart of what we do — not just in our legal work, but in how we engage with those around us. Over the past year, HCR’s (formerly HCR Hewitsons) Central England office, based on the university campus on the serene River Nene, has been proud to support a range of local initiatives, charities, and businesses that bring people together across the professional and wider community.
One of the ways we’ve done this is through HCR Emerge, a series of networking events organised for junior professionals who are, quite literally, “emerging” into their careers. The idea behind Emerge is simple: to create an environment where lasting, meaningful professional relationships can
develop - beyond the usual business card exchange.
We’ve enjoyed some wonderfully creative and community-driven events so far. From painting and prosecco at The Ark, a vegan café on a boat moored in Northampton, to pizza-making at Yellow Bus Catering, every Emerge event has supported a local business and encouraged collaboration in an informal, enjoyable setting.
Our most recent event was a charity badminton doubles tournament, hosted at the University of Northampton’s sports facilities. It was a brilliant mix of fun and friendly competition, raising funds for our two office-nominated charities, Maggie’s Northampton and Cynthia Spencer Hospice Charity.
Looking ahead, we’re preparing for our annual Trustees’ Week event in early November. Each year, we invite local trustees, and anyone involved in the voluntary and charity sector, for an afternoon of updates, discussion, and connection.
This year’s event will feature a legal update from our Charities and Not-for-Profit team, insights from a local accountancy firm and banking representative, and a talk
from Cynthia Spencer Hospice Charity, one of our office’s chosen charities. The session will close with a panel discussion exploring the current challenges facing charities in the local community.
Across all these activities, a common theme emergespartnership.
Partnership transcends mere cooperation - it entails a commitment to shared goals, mutual respect and collective responsibility, serving as a reminder that notable progress occurs when individuals collaborate, each contributing their unique skills and perspectives. A recent firmwide initiative has highlighted HCR Law’s strong culture of corporate social responsibility and community engagement.
In May, our Central England Office held an online charity auction in collaboration with Aitch & Bee Auction House to raise vital funds for Cynthia Spencer Hospice, who provide patients with specialist palliative care and family support across West Northamptonshire.
We saw this as the perfect opportunity to collaborate with business owners in our community. With their
generous support, we created two hampers with the themes of self-care and local produce and coined these ‘Central England Hampers’ – comprising products and gifts that feel truly “Northamptonshire”. We also received generous internal support from HCR employees
The benefit of using local produce and goods is twofold: raising money for charity and shining a spotlight on businesses who are doing their bit to support the wider community we serve.
Thanks to HCR’s ongoing partnership with Northampton Saints, a signed shirt from the 2024/2025 squad was also donated for our auction - a prized possession to celebrate the team’s history.
Whether we’re raising funds, sharing knowledge, or simply creating opportunities for people to meet, our aim as a sector should be to always strengthen the links that make our community thrive – there is always more we can do, and never too much of it.
Priya Parmar and Jack Tozer HCR Law
Highways made simple: Landmark’s solution for smarter conveyancing
For conveyancing transactions, a Highways report is an essential resource, helping identify potential access issue and infrastructure considerations. However, as some conveyancers would agree, it can be a challenge to get this information. Local Authority highways departments often face resource constraints, leading to delayed turnaround times for extents plans, and in some cases, highways departments have stopped providing highways information all together.
Introducing SiteSolutions Highways SiteSolutions Highways1 is Landmark’s unique highways report. It provides detailed insights about the roads, footpaths, and verges that adjoin and abut a site, helping customers stay informed about:
• whether roads, footpaths, and verges are maintainable at public expense
• nearby road improvement schemes or traffic regulation orders
• temporary roadworks and their anticipated impact
• existing rights of way through the site
• proposed changes to rights of way that could affect the site
• Our report answers the core highways questions and requirements posed by
the London Property Support Lawyers Group (LPSLG) and the Association of Property Support Lawyers (APSL) for comprehensive due diligence.
Faster turnaround with in-house data
At Landmark, we have our own in–house database of highways extents. This means:
• no need to contact the Local Authority for most sites
• quicker turnaround times
• line-only reports available where full extents data isn’t accessible
Keeping it consistent
• Each Local Authority varies in the quality, speed, and cost of highways data.
With SiteSolutions Highways, you eliminate that uncertainty.
Here’s why:
• clarity: no more messy, hard-toread plans. We digitise the extents data from the Local Authority so our customers will always receive a clear plan with the same high quality regardless of location. Our remastered landscape design and hyperlinked search results make it easier than ever to interpret the data.
• speed : some councils are taking over 100 working days to provide extents information. Landmark’s in-house data means most reports are returned within 7 working days, and if all data is available, within 2 working days. For urgent cases, we can produce a line– only report at no extra cost while waiting for the full results.
• fixed price : for standard sites*, our Highways report is offered at a fixed RRP of £175.00 + VAT, regardless of Local Authority fees. Larger sites or those requiring additional roads may incur additional fees.
More than just maintenance status The highways report goes beyond basic data. We include traffic schemes and orders, roadworks and rights of way data, helping our customers gain a clearer understanding of how nearby infrastructure could impact their site.
In summary
Landmark’s SiteSolutions Highways1 report delivers clear and consistent highways data with fast turnaround times, fixed pricing, and comprehensive insights, all backed by expert support. By reducing reliance on Local Authority data, it helps conveyancers avoid long delays and unpredictable costs, making the highways search process smoother, faster and more reliable.
Download the Sitesolutions Highways sample report2 and product card.3 Alternatively, find out more about Landmark’s SiteSolutions Highways report here.4
New Research Reveals Prevalence of Charitable Legacies Among the UK’s Wealthiest
Context
• 50% of high net worth individuals have included a charitable gift in their Will
• Charitable Will Trusts and Donor Advised Funds used by one in three millionaires
• Legacy giving is more prevalent amongst millionaires with children than those without; a contrast to mass market trends
New research from Remember A Charity, the UK’s national legacy giving campaign, reveals the prevalence of charitable gifts in Wills amongst high net worth individuals (HNWIs), highlighting the opportunity for further growth.
Charitable legacies prevalent
The study, commissioned by Remember A Charity and conducted by independent research firm Savanta*, surveyed 500 people with over £1 million in investable assets. It reveals that half (50%) of millionaires have already included a charitable gift in their Will, rising to 75% for those with estates of £5 million+.
Noting that legacy giving amongst high net worth individuals may extend beyond a simple donation in a Will, the research finds that nearly one third of the group (32%) have established a charitable Will Trust, and three in ten (28%) donated using a Donor Advised Fund (DAF).
There are generous tax incentives in the UK for those who leave a charitable gift from their estate**. Donations are tax-free and if 10% or more of the net value of the estate is donated this can reduce the Inheritance Tax rate from 40% to 36%.
Amongst those millionaires who have not included a charitable legacy in their estate plans, the large majority (58%) say they are open to doing so and just over 1 in 4 (26%) said that they simply hadn’t thought about it before. This indicates there is opportunity to engage this audience at the Will-planning stage.
Percentage gifts
Although only around one quarter of millionaires (26%) say they have prepared to leave a percentage of their estate to charity, rather than pledging a fixed sum, many more (40%) say they would be willing to
donate a share of their estate. With market studies showing that around 90% of legacy income comes from residuary gifts*** and that high value estates are driving up legacy values, this demonstrates the importance and potential impact of increasing percentage gifts in this market.
Family dynamics and intestacy
In contrast to mass market trends, where child-free individuals are twice as likely as those with children to leave a charitable gift1, this study finds that – for high net worth individuals – gifts in Wills are more prevalent for those who do have children (50%) than for those who don’t (42%). This indicates that, at this level of wealth, individuals may well recognise they are able to both secure their family’s future and provide support for charitable causes. This may also reflect the fact that intestacy tends to be higher amongst those without dependents, with 1 in 5 saying they don’t have a Will and have no plans to write one.
The research showed a surprising lack of up-to-date Wills amongst a demographic that is likely to leave considerable wealth to the next generation. Only 3 in 10 (31%) of millionaires have an up-to-date Will, and over one third (35%) of those aged 55-65 don’t have a Will at all. One quarter of the millionaires in this study say they are in the process of writing or updating their Will, reinforcing the opportunity to integrate charitable giving into estate planning.
“Charitable legacies are hugely valued across the sector, no matter the size of the gift or estate. But these insights into the high value legacy market reveal that legacy giving is even more prevalent in this space than many of us will have anticipated,” says Lucinda Frostick, Director of Remember A Charity.
“While this is certainly encouraging for charities, many of which are becoming increasingly reliant on donations from those with wealth, this also helps to reinforce to professional advisers just how relevant philanthropy is to their client base – and how crucial it is that they can support their clients in achieving their charitable legacy.”
Remember A Charity has developed a range of resources, case studies and practical tips for wealth advisers5, alongside materials for solicitors and Will-writers6, equipping them to explore the topic of legacy giving with clients. A new training programme for wealth advisers will launch this Remember A Charity Week7 (08-14 September 2025).
Professional advisers are encouraged to use the platform of Remember A Charity Week as an opportunity to raise the topic of legacy giving with clients.
To find out more, visit the campaign website.8
1Savanta / Remember A Charity, High Net Worth Legacy Study, 2025
This research on the high net worth audience was commissioned by Remember A Charity and conducted by Savanta, as part of its MillionaireVue omnibus study. The sample included 500 people with over £1 million in investable assets (high net worth individuals). The fieldwork was carried out from February to March 2025.
Legal translation services play a vital role in ensuring effective communication across language barriers in various legal contexts. From immigration proceedings to criminal justice and international business contracts, accurate legal translations are essential for maintaining the integrity of legal processes and protecting individuals’ rights.
Legal translation is more than just converting words from one language to another. It requires a deep understanding of legal terminology, cultural nuances, and the specific requirements of different legal systems. Legal translation services are crucial for:
1. Immigration and DocumentationImmigration processes rely heavily on accurate translations of vital documents such as life documents and Criminal Record checks. These documents must be translated with precision to meet immigration authorities’
requirements. Certified translations, complete with translator credentials and attestation, are often mandatory for official proceedings. Any mistranslations can have severe consequences, such as visa rejections, deportation orders, and other adverse outcomes. Accurate translation is crucial for ensuring that immigration documents are correctly interpreted and processed.
2. Criminal Justice System - Errors in legal translation can significantly impact court proceedings which is why accurate translations and interpreting are fundamental to ensuring fair trials and the process proceeds smoothly.
3. International Business and ContractsFor businesses operating across borders, legal translation services are essential for watertight contracts, regulatory compliance and corporate documentation.
The consequences of legal translation errors can be severe and far-reaching from having a financial impact to loss of professional reputation. Poor translations often lead to miscommunication and misunderstandings between parties, often distorting the meaning of agreements, contracts, or legal obligations, leading to disputes or noncompliance.
When it comes to legal translation, there’s no room for compromise. The investment in quality translation services is minimal compared to the potential costs of errors and their consequences.
To minimise risks and ensure accurate translations, it is important to work with professionals like WS Translations who are specialists and have extensive experience in the subject.
www.wstranslations.co.uk
Unlock the Full Picture: Why Clarity is Your Strongest Asset in Commercial Transactions
In commercial conveyancing, the margin for error is slim. Clients expect certainty, lenders demand accuracy, and one overlooked detail can jeopardise the deal. However, in practice, many solicitors still approach searches as a mere formality, a tick box, something to complete rather than something to analyse thoroughly. That mindset could be holding the profession back.
Clarity is more than data
The truth is, data is only as powerful as the insight it provides. A drainage and water report isn’t just a bundle of technical facts; it’s a window into the risks and responsibilities that shape your client’s decision-making. If the information is patchy, outdated, or poorly understood, you’re effectively advising in the dark.
That’s why clarity is the most valuable commodity in today’s commercial property market. As transactions become more complex, from mixed-use developments to
portfolios spread across regions, the need for complete, reliable, and expertly analysed data has never been greater. It’s not about having a report, it’s about trusting what’s inside it.
Celebrating 15 years of commercial drainage and water data
The CON29DW Commercial data has now been serving solicitors for 15 years. Its role has grown beyond providing drainage and water data: it has become an essential foundation for informed decisions. But the profession must challenge itself to use it to its full potential. That means asking not just “What’s in the report?” but “What does this mean for my client?” and “How could this affect the transaction six months or six years down the line?”
This is where experience matters. At Geodesys, with nearly 30 years of experience in the industry, we’ve seen firsthand the consequences of incomplete insight: disputes, delays, and renegotiations.
We’ve also seen how the right information, presented clearly and acted upon early, can transform outcomes. That’s why our reports are more than data dumps; they’re interpreted, quality-assured, and designed to give you confidence in every recommendation you make.
Unlock the full picture
The challenge for conveyancers is simple: don’t settle for the minimum. In a world where clients judge you on speed and certainty, clarity isn’t optional; it’s your strongest asset. By unlocking the full picture, you not only protect your clients’ interests but also strengthen your role as a trusted adviser in every transaction.
If you’re ready for the full picture, head over to the Geodesys website to get in touch* or call on 0800 085 8050. The team is here to answer any questions you may have.
* https://www.geodesys.com/contact-us
Lady Simler appointed as President of the EWI
The Expert Witness Institute is delighted to announce that Lady Simler, Justice of the Supreme Court, was appointed as President of the Institute on 15th October 2025.
Lady Simler was called to the Bar by Inner Temple in 1987, having read law at Cambridge University, and completed a post-graduate diploma in EU law at the Europa Institute, University of Amsterdam. She practised at the Bar at Devereux Chambers where she became Head of Chambers before becoming a judge. During her time at Devereux she was a member of the Attorney General’s Civil Panel A and was Junior Counsel to the Inland Revenue (Common Law) between 2002 and her appointment to silk in 2006.
She became a Judge of the High Court King’s Bench Division in October 2013. In January 2015 she was appointed President of the Employment Appeal Tribunal for a three-year term which ended on 31 December 2018.
Having served as High Court Liaison Judge for Diversity she was appointed chair of the Diversity Committee of the Judges’ Council in 2019. She also served as a member of the Civil Executive Team chaired by the Deputy Head of Civil Justice, reporting to the Master of the Rolls. She was sworn in as a Lady Justice of the Court of Appeal in June 2019. She was appointed as a Justice of the Supreme Court in November 2023.
Lady Simler succeeds The Right Hon Lord Hodge , Deputy President of the Supreme Court who became president in 2020 and stepped down as he is due to retire from the Supreme Court at the end of the year.
EWI Chair, Sir Martin Spencer , said “ We are thrilled to welcome Lady Simler as our new President. She has already demonstrated a strong interest in the role of experts, expert evidence and the work of the Institute. We look forward to working with her and bringing her strategic insight to the organisation and membership.”
Lady Simler said “It is a pleasure and a privilege to have been asked to take over from Lord Hodge as president of the Expert Witness Institute. There is a strong public interest in the work performed by experts and the justice system depends on expert evidence being both impartial and of the highest quality it can be. The EWI has an important role to play in supporting this and I look forward to working with the EWI and taking forward the excellent work done by my predecessor, Lord Hodge.”
Faces of expertise: Meet our Two Experts
At FHM Forensic Accountants we have two experienced experts in the team. Both Fiona and Tom take instructions and focus exclusively on forensic accounting and business valuations. We typically accept 60 to 70 instructions annually and most are as expert witness. We also take instructions as Single Joint Expert, Party Expert and Shadow Adviser, and prepare business valuations for tax planning and commercial purposes.
Team members Kirsty Shuckford and Graham Hines help our experts and, beyond FHM, we work with a wider team of professional contacts when specific input is needed such as on international tax.
In this article we asked the Experts to give some insight into what makes them tick.
What do you enjoy about forensic accounting and expert witness work?
Fiona: I enjoy the challenge of working through a tricky financial dispute or valuation - large or small - and putting together a report that is clear, concise and credible. It is important to me that our reports are understandable to all parties and their legal counsel. At the outset of a new instruction, it can be quite daunting but by methodically working through the financial disclosure and technical arguments, the most complex issues often become relatively simple.
Tom : Without doubt it is the variety of different cases that we take on. No case or day is the same so it keeps things fresh and interesting. There is also a strong sense
of satisfaction when our reports can help clients settle their disputes and result in a fair resolution.
What is the most challenging aspect of your work?
Tom When a particularly complex case comes along, it can be challenging to determine the most suitable approach to take as there is no “rule book” for forensic accounting. This means taking each case on its own merits and sometimes thinking outside of the box to ensure that specific characteristics of the case and their impacts are fully considered and well-evidenced. Whilst this is no doubt a significant challenge of the role, it can at the same time be very rewarding to present an argument that perhaps the client or their instructing solicitors had not identified.
Fiona: Managing several ongoing cases and unpredictable deadlines and client requirements. At FHM we work closely as a team and the added resource helps alleviate that stress and allows us to maintain the high service levels that we set ourselves to ensure we deliver to the agreed timetable at each stage of a financial dispute.
How do you find working in a specialist independent practice (FHM)?
Fiona: It has been great to start the practice from fresh adopting the latest technology and best practices without the challenges of historical systems or internal politics. A focus on our key values has allowed us to build a sustainable practice which delivers the service we aim for and allows each team member flexibility.
Tom I really enjoy the autonomy and flexibility that comes with a specialist independent practice. As a small but closeknit team we are able to adapt to meet the various demands of ongoing cases and can manage our own workload independently. This allows for flexibility and promotes a good work-life balance as much as possible whilst ensuring a high level of client service.
What is your top three tips for instructing lawyers?
Fiona: (1) In a commercial dispute I recommend early engagement with your expert as early input on the quantum of a dispute tends to help contain costs; (2) In family cases, I recommend thinking about making more use of shadow experts, both on disclosure and to review the Single Joint Expert Report; and (3) attend our regular free webinars for more tips on valuation, tax and demystifying company accounts, and our recent case studies (contact us via the website to join the invite list)
Tom (1) In the case of business valuations, obtain full statutory accounts with detailed profit and loss statements as early as possible. If these can be provided upon initial instruction, then it can save a lot of time and also enables us to quickly get a grasp of the key issues and provide a more reliable quote for our work. This gives both lawyers and their clients a bit more certainty during what can be a very uncertain process.
(2) Always ensure that instruction letters are clear and unambiguous. Sometimes instructions can be interpreted in several ways so it helps to be clear on requirements from the outset to prevent any unnecessary delay in the process.
(3) Maintain full and transparent communication with the expert throughout the process. If we are fully informed of the position of cases and made aware of any potential delays with, for example, the provision of information then it can make the process much more efficient and costeffective. If we know the latest position of each case and its likely timeline, then we can manage our workload and ensure we are in position to prepare our report on a timely basis in line with the lawyers’ anticipated timescales.
Fiona Hotston-Moore
Tom Arnold
How do you see FHM developing over the next year?
Tom I am now beginning to take on assignments in my own name as a second expert in the firm in addition to Fiona. This is an exciting development and I anticipate that by the end of the year I will have a good variety of cases under my belt in my own name. Having worked with and learnt from Fiona for many years, I have gained significant experience in a broad range of matters and am looking forward to putting my own name to reports and assisting clients in my own right.
I would also hope that growth of the team would be a natural consequence of having an additional expert and therefore would hope
to expand the team within the next year.
Fiona: I am very proud to see what Team FHM has already achieved. I look forward to seeing Tom develop his career further as an expert and issuing reports in his own name. Alongside Tom, I am delighted to see the contribution Kirsty is already making to FHM. I hope we will see another year of growth both in terms of expansion of the team and continuing to build new relationships with instructing lawyers in family law and dispute resolution across the East of England, the UK and beyond.
The work can be stressful and time pressured. How do you wind down after work?
Tom I always make sure to find time in my day to get out and get some fresh air whether that is a walk or a run. It helps clear the mind and sometimes this is when the best ideas for solving a particular issue come to me. I also have a two-year-old son who keeps me on my toes and seeing him at the end of the day quickly helps me switch out of work mode.
Fiona: I enjoy travel and with the benefits of technology, it is great to be able to work anywhere in the world. This year has seen me sitting at my desk in 20 countries.
The Law Society has, as part of its diversity and inclusion work, issued guidance on the standard greetings to be used in legal correspondence.
The use of the traditional formal greeting of “Dear Sirs” is no more.
The Law Society says that the greeting originates from a time when the profession was predominantly male and “perpetuates the assumption that the recipients of correspondence are by default men”.
Gender-inclusive (or neutral) greetings, avoiding gender-specific terms should now be used, and accord with the SRA’s Principle 6, requiring solicitors to act “in a way that encourages equality, diversity and inclusion”.
The Law Society gives some suggestions as to alternatives to Dear Sirs when you do not know the recipient’s name, or are addressing a group, and recommends you consider using:
Dear team
Dear [organisation]
Dear colleagues
Dear [role]. For example, “Dear managing partner” or “Dear head of HR”
Dear counsel
Dear [organisation name] [department name] team
To whom it may concern
Dear legal team
Dear [department name]. For example, “Dear HR team”
Greetings
Good morning or Good afternoon
Dear all
If you know the person’s name, always use it. If not, keep it simple and neutral rather than overly formal.
It’s been a busy few months since our last bulletin. Laura Carter has stepped into the role of President, with Ika taking on the position of deputy. Many thanks to Sarah for her dedication and hard work over the past year.
We recently hosted the annual awards dinner—congratulations to all the winners, nominees and those who made the shortlist; you certainly made the judges’ decisions challenging.
As this is my final message, (I’m leaving to concentrate on caring for my parents, one of whom is terminally ill) I want to say it’s been an absolute pleasure meeting, working
with, and being part of Northamptonshire’s Law community for the past six years. I have had the honour of collaborating with some amazing charities, inspiring individuals and businesses.
I’ve planned and delivered 6 Awards Dinners, where we have acknowledging and celebrated the talent in Northamptonshire.
I’ve worked with Joe Hobbins in planning 6 Great Legal walks, where participants have experienced a variety of weather conditions, all in one night! Whilst raising must needed funds for local legal charities.
I’ve assisted in getting the Pro Bono clinic off the ground, joining forces with Community Law, Citizen’s advice, Law Works, The University and Northants community foundation. Whilst it is still in its infancy, we would be grateful for any offers of support
from local solicitors who would be willing to donate some of their time to sustain a much-needed service in the community. For further information please contact Sarah Hayle at Community Law, or Jabeer Miah or Maurice Muchinda
Finally, a special note of thanks to those on Council who it has been a pleasure to support during their terms as President of the Society, and for those Council members who have supported me through the dayto-day challenges that this role can present. And to those of you who welcomed me, a non-Legal person into their communityThank you !
