NEWS NEWS
Village
The
15 - 21 May 2018
Mayoral Entrepreneurial Winner
Cape Whale Coast
FREE COPY
Bypass plans to be revised T
agreement on how to proceed will depend on discussions regarding how best to deal with these aspects, which will require input from a number of parties. “Once a way forward and a timeline have been agreed upon, stakeholders will be informed, and the amended final EIA report and/or other appropriate documentation will be released. This may well be some months into the future.
According to Sue Reuther, Principal Environmental Consultant and Associate Partner at SRK Consulting, a final decision on the way forward has not been taken, but once agreement on this has been reached, an amended final EIA report will be released.
“The Western Cape Department of Transport and Public Works (WCDTPW) also plans to address the issues raised by DEA&DP, which will feed into an amended final EIA report. Normal procedure foresees that the DEA&DP letter will be released as part of the amended report, which will also indicate how the various aspects raised by DEA&DP were addressed,” Reuther said.
De Waal Steyn
he rejection of the final Hermanus CBD Bypass Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report in March by the Provincial Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEA&DP) has stalled but not stopped the plan to build the road, despite serious resistance from the Hermanus community.
This photograph of the Hermanus Old Harbour was taken from an unusual angle on a glorious autumn day. Residents can look forward to another week of sunny days and mild temperatures, with little chance of rain. With the level of the De Bos Dam continuing to drop, however, residents may soon have to pay water levies if the winter rains do not start soon. PHOTO: Kürt Krause, MAKU Visuals
“The DEA&DP issued a letter rejecting the final EIA report and listing a number of aspects that need to be addressed in an amended final EIA report, which must be released for public comment once amended and before being resubmitted to DEA&DP for decision-making. These include aspects relating to biodiversity offset and the golf course wetland, an alternative market site, a timeline, and a specialist study review,” she said in a statement to interested and affected parties. According to Reuther, final
In March the DEA&DP said the EIA report was rejected as it does not “adequately address all the pertinent issues and will require further revised or additional information before further consideration will be given to it”. According to the report, more than 500 comments were received during the four formal commenting periods of the last few years, with the clear majority of them being critical of the bypass. Continues on P 3