Consortium survey results

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q1 What Museum Property are you answering this survey for?

Answered: 65

Skipped: 0

#

Responses

Date

1

Hermann-Grima House

6/16/2015 10:26 AM

2

The Betts House

6/2/2015 2:46 PM

3

Historic Indian Agency House Portage, Wisconsin

6/2/2015 10:05 AM

4

Wilton House Museum

6/1/2015 4:59 PM

5

Neill-Cochran House Museum

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

6

The Powder Magazine

4/29/2015 5:13 PM

7

Okefenokee Heritage Center

4/24/2015 7:42 PM

8

Casa Estudillo, Old Town San Diego

4/20/2015 2:01 PM

9

Casa Estudillo, Old Town San Diego

4/20/2015 1:25 PM

10

Neill-Cochran House Museum

4/17/2015 10:45 AM

11

Joel Lane Museum House

4/14/2015 3:52 PM

12

Travellers Rest

4/12/2015 8:12 PM

13

The Old Schoolhouse

4/10/2015 5:48 PM

14

Peachfield

4/10/2015 5:40 PM

15

Oakley Plantation

4/10/2015 4:07 PM

16

OAKLEY PLANTATION

4/10/2015 3:53 PM

17

Casa Estudillo, Old Town San Diego

4/9/2015 5:28 PM

18

McAllister House Musuem

4/9/2015 1:05 PM

19

Clarke House Museum

4/8/2015 10:14 PM

20

Delaware's First Presbyterian Church of Wilmington

4/8/2015 4:26 PM

21

New France- The OTHER Colonial America at the Bolduc House Museum

4/8/2015 3:34 PM

22

Webb-Deane-Stevens Museum

4/8/2015 11:57 AM

23

Octagon House

4/7/2015 6:08 PM

24

The Powder Magazine (Charleston, SC)

4/7/2015 11:57 AM

25

Delaware: First Presbyterian Church of Wilmington

4/6/2015 10:03 PM

26

Liberty Hall Historic Site

4/6/2015 9:29 AM

27

Liberty Hall Historic Site, Frankfort, KY

4/6/2015 9:05 AM

28

Octagon House

4/5/2015 10:30 PM

29

Moffatt-Ladd

4/3/2015 3:36 PM

30

Joel Lane Museum House

4/3/2015 2:14 PM

31

Wilton House Museum

4/3/2015 11:01 AM

32

Moffatt-Ladd House and Garden

4/2/2015 9:30 PM

33

Moffatt-Ladd House and Garden

4/2/2015 2:10 PM

34

Conde Charlotte Museum House

4/1/2015 11:14 AM

35

Stenton (NSCDA/PA)

4/1/2015 11:12 AM

1 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey 36

Webb-Deane-Stevens Museum

3/31/2015 3:37 PM

37

Van Cortlandt House Museum

3/31/2015 1:08 PM

38

Hoover-Minthorn House Museum

3/30/2015 8:35 PM

39

David Lenz House

3/30/2015 8:25 PM

40

Historic Indian Agency House

3/30/2015 12:59 PM

41

bl

3/30/2015 12:48 PM

42

Plum Grove, Iowa City, Iowa

3/30/2015 11:55 AM

43

Andrew Low House

3/30/2015 11:07 AM

44

Craik-Patton House

3/30/2015 10:57 AM

45

quincy homestead

3/29/2015 4:58 PM

46

William Hickling Prescott House

3/29/2015 4:55 PM

47

Ximenez-Fatio House Museum in St. Augustine FL

3/29/2015 2:51 PM

48

Wilton

3/29/2015 1:38 PM

49

None

3/29/2015 8:40 AM

50

Octagon House

3/28/2015 6:28 PM

51

McAllister House

3/28/2015 6:09 PM

52

Headquarters NSCD in NY

3/28/2015 5:38 PM

53

Plum Grove,Iowa City,Iowa

3/28/2015 11:34 AM

54

Stenton

3/27/2015 5:42 PM

55

Webb-Deane-Stevens Museum

3/27/2015 5:16 PM

56

The Tate House Museum, Portland, Maine

3/27/2015 3:50 PM

57

Mount Clare Museum House

3/27/2015 3:27 PM

58

Plum Grove

3/27/2015 3:19 PM

59

Ximenez-Fatio House Museum

3/27/2015 2:48 PM

60

Craik-Patton House

3/27/2015 2:28 PM

61

Clarke House Museum, Chicago, IL

3/27/2015 2:23 PM

62

Andrew Low House

3/27/2015 2:18 PM

63

Mount Clare Museum House

3/27/2015 2:03 PM

64

The Powder Magazine (Charleston, SC)

3/27/2015 1:50 PM

65

KILBOURNTOWN HOUSE Milwaukee, Wisconsin

3/27/2015 1:47 PM

2 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q2 How many visitors does your Museum typically have per year?

Answered: 60

Skipped: 5

Less than 500

500 - 999

1,000 - 2,999

3,000 - 4,999

Greater than 5,000

N/A: Museum is not open to ...

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Answer Choices

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Responses

Less than 500

15.00%

9

500 - 999

11.67%

7

1,000 - 2,999

13.33%

8

3,000 - 4,999

11.67%

7

Greater than 5,000

43.33%

26

N/A: Museum is not open to the public

5.00%

3

Total

60

3 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q3 Please rank the needs of your Museum from 1 (need most assistance and support in this area) to 11 (need least assistance and support in this area).

Answered: 65

Skipped: 0

Collections Care...

Community Outreach and...

Strategic Planning Education Programs and...

Facilities Management...

Financial Management...

Fundraising (grant writi...

Governance (Bylaws, Boa...

Preservation (historic...

Staff Recruitment ...

Website Development ...

0

1

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

8

8

9

9

10

Total

Score

18.46% 12

7.69% 5

7.69% 5

10.77% 7

9.23% 6

9.23% 6

9.23% 6

1.54% 1

10.77% 7

7.69% 5

7.69% 5

65

6.63

Community Outreach and Engagement (marketing, friends groups, etc)

10.77% 7

27.69% 18

15.38% 10

7.69% 5

4.62% 3

12.31% 8

1.54% 1

6.15% 4

1.54% 1

9.23% 6

3.08% 2

65

7.60

9.23% 6

7.69% 5

9.23% 6

10.77% 7

9.23% 6

7.69% 5

6.15% 4

6.15% 4

6.15% 4

16.92% 11

10.77% 7

65

5.77

Education Programs and Exhibits

4.62% 3

9.23% 6

13.85% 9

13.85% 9

13.85% 9

4.62% 3

13.85% 9

4.62% 3

12.31% 8

4.62% 3

4.62% 3

65

6.42

Facilities Management (HVAC, cyclical maintenance, etc.)

4.62% 3

7.69% 5

10.77% 7

12.31% 8

12.31% 8

16.92% 11

7.69% 5

7.69% 5

6.15% 4

6.15% 4

7.69% 5

65

6.18

4 / 30

7

7

Collections Care (cataloging, digitizing, conservation)

Strategic Planning

2

1

10

11

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey Financial Management (budgeting, investment policies, 990s)

1.54% 1

12.31% 8

9.23% 6

4.62% 3

15.38% 10

7.69% 5

10.77% 7

16.92% 11

7.69% 5

9.23% 6

4.62% 3

65

5.82

29.23% 19

10.77% 7

13.85% 9

10.77% 7

7.69% 5

10.77% 7

9.23% 6

1.54% 1

3.08% 2

3.08% 2

0.00% 0

65

8.26

Governance (Bylaws, Board structure and responsibilities, etc.)

7.69% 5

4.62% 3

6.15% 4

4.62% 3

6.15% 4

7.69% 5

13.85% 9

20.00% 13

9.23% 6

6.15% 4

13.85% 9

65

5.15

Preservation (historic structures and landscapes, etc)

7.69% 5

4.62% 3

6.15% 4

3.08% 2

7.69% 5

13.85% 9

13.85% 9

12.31% 8

15.38% 10

10.77% 7

4.62% 3

65

5.38

Staff Recruitment and Management (paid and volunteer)

4.62% 3

3.08% 2

7.69% 5

13.85% 9

7.69% 5

6.15% 4

10.77% 7

15.38% 10

12.31% 8

13.85% 9

4.62% 3

65

5.37

Website Development and Social Media

1.54% 1

4.62% 3

0.00% 0

7.69% 5

6.15% 4

3.08% 2

3.08% 2

7.69% 5

15.38% 10

12.31% 8

38.46% 25

65

3.42

Fundraising (grant writing, special events, annual giving, etc.)

5 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q4 Are there other areas of need, not included in the list above, that your Museum needs support/assistance with? If so, please list: Answered: 14

Skipped: 51

#

Responses

Date

1

I love the idea of working as a group to achieve cost savings in gift shop inventory purchasing. I would also love to have a listserv of museum directors - I am sure we could help one another out if we could easily ask questions of one another.

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

2

donation of appropriate articles

4/20/2015 2:01 PM

3

donation of small, historically accurate items

4/20/2015 1:25 PM

4

Development planning

4/6/2015 9:05 AM

5

Operations are leased to a third party. Would benefit from expert guidance on managing these relationships.

3/30/2015 8:25 PM

6

increased volunteer commitment

3/30/2015 12:59 PM

7

need help working with State Government that owns the building

3/29/2015 4:58 PM

8

interpretive docent script

3/29/2015 4:55 PM

9

No

3/29/2015 8:40 AM

10

Money

3/28/2015 6:09 PM

11

NO

3/27/2015 5:16 PM

12

Serious lack of membership involvement..

3/27/2015 3:27 PM

13

Plum Grove is owned by the state. The Dames care for the interior

3/27/2015 3:19 PM

14

better partnerships

3/27/2015 1:47 PM

6 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q5 Which of the following organizations does your Museum collaborate with?

Answered: 60

Skipped: 5

Other Museum Properties/H...

Museum Organization...

Historical Society...

Schools (K-12) Universities/Un iversity...

Girl Scouts/Boy...

Other Heritage Organization...

Government (federal/sta...

Preservation Society Other Women's Groups (Juni...

Park District (state/local)

Library

Other (please specify) We generally do not...

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Answer Choices

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Responses

Other Museum Properties/Historic Houses

68.33%

41

Museum Organizations (AAM, AASLH, state or local museum associations, etc.)

65.00%

39

Historical Society (state/local)

63.33%

38

Schools (K-12)

63.33%

38

Universities/University Programs

50.00%

30

Girl Scouts/Boy Scouts

48.33%

29

Other Heritage Organizations (DAR, Colonial Warriors, SAR, etc)

45.00%

27

Government (federal/state/local)

45.00%

27

7 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey Preservation Society

36.67%

22

Other Women's Groups (Junior League, Garden Club, Women's Clubs, etc)

36.67%

22

Park District (state/local)

25.00%

15

Library

20.00%

12

Other (please specify)

13.33%

8

We generally do not collaborate with other organizations

1.67%

1

Total Respondents: 60

#

Other (please specify)

Date

1

Per exhibit, those organizations that are connected to the subject of the exhibit

6/2/2015 2:46 PM

2

governance and outreach/education

4/20/2015 2:01 PM

3

State controlled outreach/education

4/20/2015 1:25 PM

4

We do not advertise with any group. We give home for local pilgrimage, garden club, schools

4/10/2015 4:07 PM

5

Chamber of Commerce, Dept. of Tourism

4/8/2015 3:34 PM

6

Nature Conservancy; Blue Star Museums

4/5/2015 10:30 PM

7

Portsmouth Black Heritage Trail

4/2/2015 2:10 PM

8

Questors

3/28/2015 11:34 AM

8 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q6 Do you belong to any other national museum consortium or national program?

Answered: 59

Skipped: 6

Yes

No

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Answer Choices

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Responses

Yes

37.29%

22

No

62.71%

37

Total

59

#

If yes, please explain:

Date

1

AAM, AASLH

6/16/2015 10:26 AM

2

AASLH

6/2/2015 2:46 PM

3

I do not know. Anne Vravick will be able to answer this question on our behalf.

6/2/2015 10:05 AM

4

National Trust, NARM, AAM, ASLH

6/1/2015 4:59 PM

5

National Association for Interpretation

4/29/2015 5:13 PM

6

allied with other State Museums in governance, budget, and collections

4/20/2015 2:01 PM

7

AASLH, NARM, Time Travelers, AAM

4/14/2015 3:52 PM

8

Blue Star Museums AASLH

4/12/2015 8:12 PM

9

AASLH, AAM

4/10/2015 5:48 PM

10

AASLH, AAM

4/10/2015 5:40 PM

11

Blue Star Museums

4/9/2015 1:05 PM

12

AAM

4/8/2015 10:14 PM

13

ALHFAM and MOMCC

4/8/2015 3:34 PM

14

AAM, SEMC

4/6/2015 9:29 AM

15

AASLH

4/3/2015 3:36 PM

16

NARM

4/3/2015 2:14 PM

17

Local such as Historic Houses of Greater Richmond and statewide such as The Road to Revolution

4/3/2015 11:01 AM

18

We do participate in a local consortium of 16 historic sites and cultural attractions- Historic Germantown.

4/1/2015 11:12 AM

19

Our Executive Director coordinates with museums in St. Augustine and around the state.

3/29/2015 2:51 PM

20

National Trust, AAM, ASLH

3/29/2015 1:38 PM

21

Placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1972

3/28/2015 6:28 PM

9 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey 22

Hotel de Paris. Georgetown Colorado

3/28/2015 6:09 PM

23

DAR, Mayflower,

3/27/2015 3:19 PM

24

NTHP,and AASLH

3/27/2015 2:48 PM

10 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q7 How do you think a national museum consortium could benefit your Museum?

Answered: 51

Skipped: 14

#

Responses

Date

1

Collections sharing, pooled administrative resources, economies of scale for administrative expenses

6/16/2015 10:32 AM

2

Webinars that help us address our operations and exhibit areas of need

6/2/2015 2:47 PM

3

I love the idea of crowdsourcing answers to questions - right now everyone works in our own little bubbles and I am guessing we do a lot of reinventing wheels. Any way of leveraging publicity through national would be helpful - we desperately want to expand our reach but do not have the financial tools to do so.

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

4

The collaboration would be useful and to potentially network collections/resources

4/29/2015 5:18 PM

5

The exposure and experience that comes with a national museum consortium

4/24/2015 7:43 PM

6

Only with exchange of ideas . The Casa is wholly controlled by our State government. (Dames furnish and consult)

4/20/2015 2:08 PM

7

funding, promotion

4/14/2015 3:53 PM

8

Shared purchasing power Shared marketing Shared ideas

4/12/2015 8:15 PM

9

Do not perceive it as beneficial for us

4/10/2015 5:50 PM

10

Skeptical about benefits

4/10/2015 5:43 PM

11

Advertising, training docents, lobbying for funds from state

4/10/2015 4:08 PM

12

ADVERTISEMENT

4/10/2015 3:55 PM

13

Getting the word out to people who might be visiting Colorado Springs

4/9/2015 1:11 PM

14

Shared resources - information, collections, publicity, etc.

4/8/2015 10:29 PM

15

Shared resources and brainstorming, conferences, group health insurance possibly

4/8/2015 3:37 PM

16

By providing an accessible resource/forum for the exchange of information as well as ideas relating particularly to museum governance and methods for attracting outside (i,e., non-Dame) funding and volunteer support.

4/8/2015 12:36 PM

17

Exposure

4/7/2015 6:11 PM

18

Museums, particularly house museums, need to work together to expand their offerings . . . and a national consortium could only improve the number and variety of ideas to be shared.

4/7/2015 12:05 PM

19

Our Site could benefit from knowing the experience of other NSCDA sites. Also, we need a consortium to help our board understand big picture issues like the importance of developing a community audience, broader than dames.

4/6/2015 9:35 AM

20

Exchange of ideas and peer review of policies.

4/6/2015 9:12 AM

21

Increase our visibility; give us better access to resources and ideas for addressing our biggest problems (low visitation and difficulty finding docents) and improving the Octagon House as a house museum

4/5/2015 10:36 PM

22

sharing ideas, BMP's etc.. Not clear if this intended to be a NSCDA org--which would be good-institutionalizing the work of the committee; if the intent is to start an organization of all museums. I think it is duplicative and a waste of time and energy. There might be a role for one just of house msuems, but I'm not sure.

4/3/2015 3:41 PM

23

Forum for sharing ideas

4/3/2015 2:16 PM

24

Increase national awareness of the preservation efforts of the Society.

4/3/2015 11:06 AM

25

Sharing information about policies, practices, programs, staff development.

4/2/2015 10:03 PM

11 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey 26

Members need the perspective that comes from working with other museums. The professional staff does well in this regard, but many members are not aware of the national standards that the staff works to maintain. It also could be very helpful in making sure that the various state societies understand the need for strategic planning and Board training. The latter is, I think, especially critical for sites such as ours where the issues are complex.

The Board officers, in particular, need to keep up with training in nonprofit fiscal management, historic preservation standards, and board ethics and responsibilities. By creating a set of expectations for ongoing Board training and strategic planning, the consortium could really help to elevate the level of professionalism in NSCDA museums.

4/2/2015 2:25 PM

27

Collaboration would help with setting priorities and problem solving.

4/1/2015 10:04 PM

28

Leverage fundraising through larger funding sources, individuals, goverment and large foundations (i.e. David Rubenstein), and provide more fundraising support for out museum properties, probably the biggest area of need for all of our Societies.

4/1/2015 11:19 AM

29

Attendance and recognition

4/1/2015 11:15 AM

30

It could benefit the Museum by negotiating special discounts for routine purchases such as custodial supplies, archival supplies, etc. It would also ideally be a place to go to to find resources such as curators, contractors, conservators, and other consultants. This would be a list of recommended providers who have successfully completed projects.

3/31/2015 1:16 PM

31

Share best practices in all aspects of management and administration, marketing and fundraising.

3/30/2015 8:36 PM

32

the more publicity, the better; we also have a new, incoming executive director who could probably benefit as well.

3/30/2015 1:00 PM

33

Needs assessment.

3/30/2015 11:57 AM

34

Educational programs and grant writing

3/30/2015 11:09 AM

35

leverage others learnings and experience

3/29/2015 4:58 PM

36

we could leverage each other

3/29/2015 4:55 PM

37

The sharing of ideas; collaboration on local projects; networking with professionals and volunteers, who are interested in saving and maintaining historic properties; finding ways to work together to promote the history of a particular area as it pertains to the American story

3/28/2015 6:49 PM

38

Don't Know

3/28/2015 6:11 PM

39

best practices- although it must be noted this building is used primarily as Headquarters for the NYC chapter

3/28/2015 5:39 PM

40

Support

3/28/2015 11:35 AM

41

Raise awareness. Raise profile. Raise funds.

3/27/2015 5:45 PM

42

It could perhaps offer support that may be helpful without our having to seek it from afar. It might prevent us from "reinventing the wheel" syndrome.

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

43

I eel we are a very small group, at this point, but hearing ideas from more successful groups is always very helpful.

3/27/2015 3:52 PM

44

Could be helpful in number of visitors

3/27/2015 3:52 PM

45

Not sure what a national consortium does.

3/27/2015 3:20 PM

46

Help us with strategic planning. Teach the Board how to put time frames, dollar amounts & specific people on projects and prioritize them.

3/27/2015 2:52 PM

47

Save money on and raise level of professional consultants since costs could be shared. Museum houses could be resources for each other. Staff training could be combined. Exhibits might travel from one house to another over a three year period using the same marketing materials/educational materials. Might have a spring and fall tour group visiting our properties.

3/27/2015 2:38 PM

48

Ability to share resources; Exposure to varied approaches in solving similar problems; Networking; Inspire creative programming and exhibits

3/27/2015 2:31 PM

49

By providing shared expertise with its members

3/27/2015 2:21 PM

50

Marketing, networking, collective-knowledge, on-line exhibits, collective-digital initiatives. Think this needs to have concrete measurable benefits for participants.

3/27/2015 2:11 PM

51

possible passport with stamps for all NSCDA sites visited

3/27/2015 1:50 PM

12 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q8 How do you expect a national museum consortium would benefit the NSCDA nationally?

Answered: 46

Skipped: 19

#

Responses

Date

1

Public perception of business acumen, serious strategic thinking for sustainability of house museums, leveraged network of shared resources

6/16/2015 10:32 AM

2

Stronger collaboration between NSCDA sites

6/2/2015 2:47 PM

3

I think that the NSCDA has a major perception issue - those who actually know about the Dames are few, from the people who walk in our doors, and the few who do have no idea how involved the organization is in historic preservation. Using the properties as a marketing tool for the organization is a great idea.

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

4

It might bring museum property managers closer for greater programming ideas

4/29/2015 5:18 PM

5

I don`t believe that it would help

4/20/2015 2:08 PM

6

funding, promotion

4/14/2015 3:53 PM

7

More visibility for the NSCDA and their role in historic preservation and education

4/12/2015 8:15 PM

8

Skeptical as to benefits

4/10/2015 5:50 PM

9

Seriously question that it would benefit the organization as a whole

4/10/2015 5:43 PM

10

same as no. 8

4/10/2015 4:08 PM

11

ADVERTISEMENT

4/10/2015 3:55 PM

12

I really don't know

4/9/2015 1:11 PM

13

By reinforcing NSCDA name, mission and branding, a consortium could raise awareness of the Dames and of our "product" (museums).

4/8/2015 10:29 PM

14

See #7

4/8/2015 3:37 PM

15

Enhance its visibility as a concerned and proactive participant in contemporary museum matters.

4/8/2015 12:36 PM

16

NSCDA owns many properties but they are not known as NSCDA properties - would publicize the important work we do

4/7/2015 6:11 PM

17

It would bring the NSCDA's museums (many of which are small) to the attention of the national museum community.

4/7/2015 12:05 PM

18

The consortium would help the NSCDA with marketing and publicity to gain the respect it deserves for preserving our nation's historic treasures. It could build PR for a forward thinking organization that serves the nation and our communities.

4/6/2015 9:35 AM

19

It would raise the awareness of national standards within NSCDA and demonstrate to others our high professional standards.

4/6/2015 9:12 AM

20

Increase visibility of property. Share knowledge, ideas and solutions to problems.

4/5/2015 10:36 PM

21

raise visability

4/3/2015 3:41 PM

22

Increase national awareness of the preservation efforts of the Society.

4/3/2015 11:06 AM

23

More visibility.

4/2/2015 10:03 PM

24

It won't benefit the NSCDA unless museum professionals and NSCDA members interact and participate in the same workshops and training. That being said, what is VERY helpful is when the National organization supports professionals and volunteers in the various museums as we try to maintain best practices and high standards. A national consortium could help to ensure that we are all doing the best job we can of engaging the general public, preserving our sites using the highest standards and best consultants and preservation craftsmen available, and governing the museums in a responsible and ethical manner that remains consistent even when society officers and professional staff change.

4/2/2015 2:25 PM

25

Broaden awareness of all historical properties under NSCDA operation.

4/1/2015 10:04 PM

13 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey 26

Would solidify the NSCDA as one of the leading organizations in Preservation in America, behind only the National Park Service. Could be an advocate for historic sites and preservation on a national stage which is desperately needed right now with rentrenchment of the National Trust, cuts to the Park Service, and desperate situation of many historic house museums.

4/1/2015 11:19 AM

27

Awareness to properties and purposes

4/1/2015 11:15 AM

28

A national museum consortium, comprised of the NSCDA's member properties, would elevate the profile of the NSCDA Member Societies as serious keepers of history. There is potentially great power in numbers.

3/31/2015 1:16 PM

29

Promote NSCDA with more clarity and credibility. Would raise the standard for our museums, lifting the lower ones to a higher benchmark.

3/30/2015 8:36 PM

30

Collaboration

3/30/2015 11:57 AM

31

Communication

3/30/2015 11:09 AM

32

by forging a stronger link between our museum properties, a consortium may enable us to create a stronger presence nationally and in our 4 regions.

3/28/2015 6:49 PM

33

Don't Know

3/28/2015 6:11 PM

34

again, best practices

3/28/2015 5:39 PM

35

Consistancy

3/28/2015 11:35 AM

36

Raise our profile as "ladies who do museums" rather than "ladies who do lunch".

3/27/2015 5:45 PM

37

It would bring greater recognition to the organization.

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

38

Publicity for our beautiful House and Collection could be tremendously helpful in our fundraising attempts.

3/27/2015 3:52 PM

39

With programs of the Colonial period

3/27/2015 3:52 PM

40

No idea.

3/27/2015 3:20 PM

41

It will help us all learn from one another and not have to "re-invent the wheel"

3/27/2015 2:52 PM

42

It would provide a more accurate picture of the impact of the National Society in the field of Preservation.

3/27/2015 2:38 PM

43

Will create a stronger community among the individual societies holding museum properties and foster unity in meeting mission

3/27/2015 2:31 PM

44

Improve communication, Standardized policies and procedures

3/27/2015 2:21 PM

45

Raise public awareness of NSCDA.

3/27/2015 2:11 PM

46

develop a National program to engage people in history again/ America has stopped teaching history in our primary schools and that is where a love of history begins

3/27/2015 1:50 PM

14 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q9 What types of projects do you think our historic house museums could work together on as part of a Consortium?

Answered: 42

Skipped: 23

#

Responses

Date

1

Shared collections (traveling exhibits, loans), shared admin resources (insurance pools, web-based tools, standardized practices (forms, policies and procedures, accreditation practices)

6/16/2015 10:32 AM

2

Travelling exhibits, shared programs

6/2/2015 2:47 PM

3

A traveling exhibition could be interesting to some properties - depending on whether they have exhibit space. I think a listserv of directors would be incredibly beneficial. I also think as I said somewhere else, that it would be great if we could work together on some elements of gift shop inventories.

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

4

Exhibit rotation (artifacts and portable exhibits), management collaboration, and support for large-scale public programs.

4/29/2015 5:18 PM

5

Brief review of other properties era and style of interest so that our edited articles might aid another museum.

4/20/2015 2:08 PM

6

publications

4/14/2015 3:53 PM

7

A national marketing effort

4/12/2015 8:15 PM

8

No opinion

4/10/2015 5:50 PM

9

We already have a basis for this kind of collaboration, I'm unclear how a "Consortium" would change the potential to work together

4/10/2015 5:43 PM

10

same as above

4/10/2015 4:08 PM

11

TRAINING DOCENTS ADVERTISING, TRAINING STAFF,

4/10/2015 3:55 PM

12

Finding funds for preservation and expensive maintenance; grant locating and writing.

4/9/2015 1:11 PM

13

Collection database, workshops for AAM accreditation, staff development, publications.

4/8/2015 10:29 PM

14

Shared Mobile Phone Aps, connecting the dots between our histories

4/8/2015 3:37 PM

15

See answer to #7.

4/8/2015 12:36 PM

16

We could develop traveling exhibitions within a region and perhaps nationally to show the range of our collections and encourage visitation to the lending museums.

4/7/2015 12:05 PM

17

Building a national reputation as the leading preservation organization in the country. Strengthening the reputation of NSCDA properties would help the sites gain national recognition as important Sites to visit.

4/6/2015 9:35 AM

18

Together we could engage nationally recognized experts to speak to us as a group on topics of general interest.

We can market our sites collectively.

4/6/2015 9:12 AM

19

increase visitation/ community engagement Increase awareness of our properties among the public

4/5/2015 10:36 PM

20

digitalization, etc

4/3/2015 3:41 PM

21

Getting history education into the schools, something like "Why America is Free?" but better

4/3/2015 2:16 PM

22

Marketing

4/3/2015 11:06 AM

23

Ideas for involving the public. 21st century techniques for showcasing the property.

4/2/2015 10:03 PM

24

I was very pleased to be able to gain support from National regarding a museum ethics issue that the local state society did not understand. This is the kind of support that is very helpful.

4/2/2015 2:25 PM

25

Shared information on property management and collections care.

4/1/2015 10:04 PM

26

Joint marketing, sharing best practices, advocacy at the National and state levels (a la AAM/AASLH), join fundraising. Developing model educational programs for museum properties.

4/1/2015 11:19 AM

27

Educational - studies of Colonial History

4/1/2015 11:15 AM

15 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey 28

A continuation of national object surveys such as paintings, samplers, chairs, etc. Also making these surveys available online to researchers. There are incredible yet little known collections in each of the museum properties that need to be made available.

3/31/2015 1:16 PM

29

Identify common themes for tours, regional promotions. Great American Treasures compilation is a start, but we could do more with little additional effort. Educating our members on what we have across the country would be a great start.

3/30/2015 8:36 PM

30

Exhibits and propgrams

3/30/2015 11:09 AM

31

An education program focusing on the privilege and responsibility of living in a free society would be wonderful

3/28/2015 6:49 PM

32

Don't Know

3/28/2015 6:11 PM

33

Blog of shared ideas?

3/28/2015 11:35 AM

34

1--Education programs tailored to specific periods in history: Civil War sites, Revolutionary War sites, etc. 2-National locations for celebrating Flag Day.

3/27/2015 5:45 PM

35

Celebrating major anniversaries -- milestone of history.

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

36

I think that it might help us to learn how to write Grants for upkeep would be a huge help. Ideas for exhibits to attract more visitors.

3/27/2015 3:52 PM

37

Visitors Membership Fundraising

3/27/2015 3:52 PM

38

Tying them all in to a larger story about the development of our country.

3/27/2015 3:20 PM

39

Exhibits, Education Programs, Marketing, Fundraising

3/27/2015 2:38 PM

40

Thematic interpretation - it might be fun for all Dames museum properties to center one exhibit a year around a single common topic, tailored to their site, region and time period.

3/27/2015 2:31 PM

41

Conservation, educational program collections exchange

3/27/2015 2:21 PM

42

Marketing, networking, collective-knowledge, on-line exhibits, collective-digital initiatives, social media.

3/27/2015 2:11 PM

16 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q10 Would you be interested in serving on a committee to develop a National Museum Consortium?

Answered: 49

Skipped: 16

Yes

No

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Answer Choices

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Responses

Yes

26.53%

13

No

73.47%

36

Total

49

#

If yes, please provide your personal area of interest or expertise:

Date

1

Strategic planning, management, marketing

6/16/2015 10:32 AM

2

I have a PhD in 19th century American Art. My background until becoming ED of the NCHM was almost entirely academic, and not in house museums. However, I would be happy to help if you would like me to.

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

3

I am experienced (35yrs) and vitally interested, but I am too old and disabled....unfortunately

4/20/2015 2:08 PM

4

I would be happy to serve on any committee. I am particularly interested in collections and publications.

4/8/2015 10:29 PM

5

Maybe if our director had the time - her area of expertise is museum interpretation

4/8/2015 3:37 PM

6

I have worked for the past decade in organizing decorative arts lecture programs.

4/7/2015 12:05 PM

7

I do not have particular expertise, but am supportive of the idea.

4/6/2015 9:12 AM

8

Absolutely. I think that with my professional training and experience, along with my 15 years as Director/curator at the Moffatt-Ladd House & Garden I could be very helpful.

4/2/2015 2:25 PM

9

Currently preside over Historic Germantown, a consortium of 16 historic sites and cultural attractions in the Philadelphia region.

4/1/2015 11:19 AM

10

I have experience working with a consortium of historic house museums in New York City.

3/31/2015 1:16 PM

11

Possibly. Would have to learn more about it.

3/30/2015 8:36 PM

12

Unfortunately I am moving back to New England so cannot really commit to this project.

3/30/2015 1:00 PM

13

Volunteer, retired museum director-health issues.

3/30/2015 11:57 AM

14

Too busy as president.

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

15

Sorry but my life is to busy these days!

3/27/2015 3:52 PM

16

Finances

3/27/2015 2:52 PM

17

Living History Interpretation; Historic Foodways

3/27/2015 2:31 PM

18

Twenty years museum experience in both large and small venues (11 at the executive level). Personal interest in colonial interpretation to include transportation, exhibits, collections management.

3/27/2015 2:11 PM

17 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q11 If you are interested in a follow-up personal interview to discuss a National Consortium, please provide your contact information.

Answered: 16

Skipped: 49

Answer Choices

Responses

Name

100.00%

16

Corporate Society

0.00%

0

Position within the Society

0.00%

0

Address 2

0.00%

0

City / Town

0.00%

0

State / Province

0.00%

0

ZIP / Postal Code

0.00%

0

Country

0.00%

0

Email

100.00%

16

Phone

100.00%

16

#

Name

Date

1

Mamie Gasperecz

6/16/2015 10:32 AM

2

Rowena Dasch

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

3

Susan Walker

4/12/2015 8:15 PM

4

Mary Glerum

4/8/2015 10:29 PM

5

Connie Baldwin

4/7/2015 12:05 PM

6

Julienne Foster

4/6/2015 9:35 AM

7

Leslie Miller

4/6/2015 9:12 AM

8

Janis Horne

4/5/2015 10:36 PM

9

Barbara Ward

4/2/2015 2:25 PM

10

Sarah Munro

4/1/2015 10:04 PM

11

Dennis S. Pickeral

4/1/2015 11:19 AM

12

Laura Carpenter Myers

3/31/2015 1:16 PM

13

Charbra Adams Jestin

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

14

Jane Boylin

3/27/2015 2:38 PM

15

Becky LaBarre

3/27/2015 2:31 PM

16

David Shackelford

3/27/2015 2:11 PM

#

Corporate Society

Date

There are no responses. #

Position within the Society

Date

There are no responses. #

Address 2

Date

18 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey There are no responses. #

City / Town

Date

There are no responses. #

State / Province

Date

There are no responses. #

ZIP / Postal Code

Date

There are no responses. #

Country

Date

There are no responses. #

Email

Date

1

mamieg@hgghh.org

6/16/2015 10:32 AM

2

rhdasch@nchmuseum.org

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

3

sgww1@bellsouth.net

4/12/2015 8:15 PM

4

meglerum@gmail.com

4/8/2015 10:29 PM

5

cmbaldwin48@gmail.com

4/7/2015 12:05 PM

6

director@libertyhall.org

4/6/2015 9:35 AM

7

miller444@bellsouth.net

4/6/2015 9:12 AM

8

jhorne@bailard.com

4/5/2015 10:36 PM

9

moffattladd@gmail.com

4/2/2015 2:25 PM

10

sarahmunro@comcast.net

4/1/2015 10:04 PM

11

dennis.pickeral@stenton.org

4/1/2015 11:19 AM

12

Laura.Carpenter@vchm.org

3/31/2015 1:16 PM

13

charbra1@comacst.net

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

14

jane@boylin.com

3/27/2015 2:38 PM

15

curator@clarkehousemuseum.org

3/27/2015 2:31 PM

16

director@mountclare.org

3/27/2015 2:11 PM

#

Phone

Date

1

504.228.1584

6/16/2015 10:32 AM

2

(512) 478-2335

6/1/2015 3:27 PM

3

615-790-6211

4/12/2015 8:15 PM

4

847-920-0315

4/8/2015 10:29 PM

5

843-577-3096

4/7/2015 12:05 PM

6

502-227-2560

4/6/2015 9:35 AM

7

502-551-9626

4/6/2015 9:12 AM

8

(650)571-5800

4/5/2015 10:36 PM

9

(603) 430-7968

4/2/2015 2:25 PM

10

503-806-7286

4/1/2015 10:04 PM

11

215-329-7312

4/1/2015 11:19 AM

12

718-543-3344

3/31/2015 1:16 PM

13

860-677-6735

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

14

304-525-0043

3/27/2015 2:38 PM

15

312-326-1480

3/27/2015 2:31 PM

19 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey 16

410-215-1093

3/27/2015 2:11 PM

20 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q12 Does your Corporate Society own and operate the Museum independently? (Your Society fully owns the building and grounds and all the collections, if any. Your Society governs the Museum with a Board or Committee entirely made up of Dames.)

Answered: 51

Skipped: 14

Yes

No

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Answer Choices

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Responses

Yes

56.86%

29

No

43.14%

22

Total

51

21 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q13 Please explain the ownership of the Museum Building/Historic Structure: Answered: 21

Skipped: 44

We own the museum building

The state owns the museum...

The county/munic...

Another 501c3 organization...

Other ownership...

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Answer Choices

Responses

We own the museum building

14.29%

3

The state owns the museum building

33.33%

7

The county/municipality owns the museum building

38.10%

8

Another 501c3 organization owns the museum building (please identify below)

9.52%

2

Other ownership situation (please identify below)

4.76%

1

Total

21

#

Details:

Date

1

The Dames (local Committee) owns the furnishings which are loaned to the specific site for a determined period.

Furnishings are maintained by the State and all operations. Dames are responsible for periodic inventory and appraisal.

4/20/2015 2:21 PM

2

NSCDA-NC owns the property, Joel Lane Museum House, Inc., owns the collection

4/14/2015 3:56 PM

3

The City of Chicago owns the building.

4/8/2015 10:33 PM

4

The NSCDA/PA has administered Stenton since 1899. The building and grounds are owned by the City of Philadelphia, but an ordinance and lease give the Dames full custody of the property and the Society funds all preservation projects, programs and administration of the site. The Society also owns all of the collections in the museum and equipment on the property.

4/1/2015 11:23 AM

5

NSCDA in Maine owns the Museum but is its own 501 C-3 governed bu a Board of Dames and Community members

3/27/2015 3:55 PM

6

The Dames established a community board which is a separate 501c3m but 60% of the Directors of the Board must be Dames. While another board owns and operates; the governing majority is made up of Dames so we are in charge in my opinion.

3/27/2015 2:43 PM

7

City owns building, NSCDA manages and sub-lets to B&O Railroad Museum for day-to-day operations

3/27/2015 2:13 PM

8

the house sits on Milwaukee County Park lands and is owned by the county, the Milwaukee County Historical Society runs the house, the NSCDA-Wisconsin owns the collection of antiques inside the house and the House Chairperson usually sits on the MCHS board to help run the house

3/27/2015 1:54 PM

22 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q14 Please explain the ownership of the collections within the Museum: Answered: 21

Skipped: 44

We own the collections

The state owns the collections

The county/munic...

Another 501c3 organization...

Other (please identify below)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Answer Choices

Responses

We own the collections

71.43%

15

The state owns the collections

0.00%

0

The county/municipality owns the collections

0.00%

0

Another 501c3 organization owns the collections (please identify below)

9.52%

2

Other (please identify below)

19.05%

4

Total

21

#

Details:

Date

1

The State gives prominent and full recognition to the Dames as donors of the furniture. There are 23,000 visitors a year. Saturdays often 1000. The most visited of all Calif. State Park sites

4/20/2015 2:21 PM

2

NSCDA owns furnishings in library

4/10/2015 4:10 PM

3

The Colonial Dames owns the furnishings in the library

4/10/2015 3:57 PM

4

The Dames own the collections, although the City of Chicago owns a collection (largely ephemera) related to the history of the building.

4/8/2015 10:33 PM

5

The other 501c3 owns much of the collection with the NSCDA owning some parts.

4/6/2015 9:36 AM

6

Joel Lane Museum House, Inc. which paid for them.

4/3/2015 2:20 PM

7

The answer to #13 is the same.

3/27/2015 2:43 PM

8

Dames owned collection.

3/27/2015 2:13 PM

23 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q15 Please explain the ownership of the grounds/lands on which the Museum sits: Answered: 21

Skipped: 44

We own the land

The state owns the land

The county/munic...

Another 501c3 organization...

Other (please identify below)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Answer Choices

90% 100%

Responses

We own the land

9.52%

2

The state owns the land

33.33%

7

The county/municipality owns the land

33.33%

7

Another 501c3 organization owns the land (please identify below)

9.52%

2

Other (please identify below)

14.29%

3

Total

21

#

Details:

Date

1

Gounds are maintained by State Park employees..

4/20/2015 2:21 PM

2

NSCDA-NC is the owner and the City of Raleigh owns a portion of the lot, for which we have an easement.

4/14/2015 3:56 PM

3

The Chicago Park District owns the park in which the house sits. The City of Chicago owns the ground under the house and approximately 6 feet around it.

4/8/2015 10:33 PM

4

The other 501c3 owns 1/2 ofthe property with the NSCDA owning the other.

4/6/2015 9:36 AM

5

The City owns part of the land and the NSCDA in NC owns part.

4/3/2015 2:20 PM

6

The city owns the land but the NSCDA/PA cares for the property and has a 50-year lease.

4/1/2015 11:23 AM

7

Chicago Park District owns the land, but the City of Chicago retains the footprint under the building plus a five foot easement

3/27/2015 2:33 PM

8

City owns park and grounds.

3/27/2015 2:13 PM

24 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q16 Please explain the Museum's Board structure: Answered: 21

Skipped: 44

Our Board/Commit...

Our Museum has a...

Other (please specify)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Answer Choices

90% 100%

Responses

Our Board/Committee is made up entirely of Dames

33.33%

7

Our Museum has a community/independent Board

9.52%

2

Other (please specify)

57.14%

12

Total

21

#

Other (please specify)

Date

1

State, State contracted professionals, Dames.

4/20/2015 2:21 PM

2

Mostly Dames, plus a few community volunteers

4/14/2015 3:56 PM

3

State hires full time director. Oakley has Friends board

4/10/2015 4:10 PM

4

There is a full time director and a Friends board

4/10/2015 3:57 PM

5

The CHM Advisory Committee is made up of representatives of the Dames, the Department of Cultural Affairs and Glessner House Museum.

4/8/2015 10:33 PM

6

Board of made up of Dames and community members. Makes for a much stronger Board.

4/3/2015 2:20 PM

7

Falls under the State of Iowa's Cultural Affairs Office

3/30/2015 11:59 AM

8

Board is made up of Dames and Community members independent of the Dames board

3/27/2015 3:55 PM

9

One Dame works with the state / many Dames clean the house in the spring.

3/27/2015 3:22 PM

10

Community board with Colonial Dames controlling 60%.

3/27/2015 2:43 PM

11

Our Museum Advisory Council is made up of three representatives from each of the museum's partner organizations: NSCDA-IL, City of Chicago, and Glessner House Museum.

3/27/2015 2:33 PM

12

the Milwaukee County Historical Society Board and staff govern the house

3/27/2015 1:54 PM

25 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q17 If your Museum has a community/independent Board, which of the following best describes it: Answered: 19

Skipped: 46

It includes a majority of...

It includes some Dames

Our Society maintains...

Not applicable

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Answer Choices

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Responses

It includes a majority of Dames

10.53%

2

It includes some Dames

26.32%

5

Our Society maintains certain reserve power (please describe below)

10.53%

2

Not applicable

57.89%

11

Total Respondents: 19

#

Please describe:

Date

1

Contractural restrictions of furrnishings.

4/20/2015 2:21 PM

2

Oakley has Friends board.

4/10/2015 4:10 PM

26 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q18 What Corporate Society are you a member of?

Answered: 48

Skipped: 17

#

Responses

Date

1

Louisiana

6/16/2015 10:40 AM

2

NSCDA-OH

6/2/2015 2:48 PM

3

Texas

6/1/2015 3:28 PM

4

South Carolina

4/29/2015 5:19 PM

5

San Diego County

4/20/2015 2:28 PM

6

N/A

4/14/2015 3:57 PM

7

Tennessee

4/12/2015 8:16 PM

8

New Jersey

4/10/2015 5:50 PM

9

New Jersey

4/10/2015 5:44 PM

10

Louisiana

4/10/2015 4:11 PM

11

Louisiana

4/10/2015 3:58 PM

12

NSCDA-CO

4/9/2015 1:13 PM

13

Illinois

4/8/2015 10:34 PM

14

Missouri

4/8/2015 3:37 PM

15

Connecticut

4/8/2015 12:36 PM

16

California

4/7/2015 6:12 PM

17

South Carolina Society

4/7/2015 12:06 PM

18

NSCDA in Kentucky

4/6/2015 9:37 AM

19

Kentucky

4/6/2015 9:13 AM

20

California

4/5/2015 10:37 PM

21

NH

4/3/2015 3:42 PM

22

NC

4/3/2015 2:20 PM

23

NSCDA-VA

4/3/2015 11:08 AM

24

New Hampshire

4/2/2015 10:04 PM

25

None. I am the professional director/curator

4/2/2015 2:26 PM

26

NSCDA/PA

4/1/2015 11:23 AM

27

Alabama

4/1/2015 11:16 AM

28

N/A

3/31/2015 1:18 PM

29

Indiana

3/30/2015 8:37 PM

30

Questers of Iowa City

3/30/2015 12:01 PM

31

Savannah

3/30/2015 11:11 AM

32

massachusetts

3/29/2015 4:59 PM

33

massachusetts

3/29/2015 4:56 PM

34

California

3/28/2015 6:51 PM

35

Colorado

3/28/2015 6:13 PM

27 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey 36

New York

3/28/2015 5:40 PM

37

Davenport Borough

3/28/2015 11:38 AM

38

PA

3/27/2015 5:51 PM

39

Connecticut

3/27/2015 5:19 PM

40

Maine

3/27/2015 3:56 PM

41

NSCDA-MD

3/27/2015 3:54 PM

42

Iowa

3/27/2015 3:23 PM

43

Florida

3/27/2015 2:53 PM

44

West Virginia

3/27/2015 2:43 PM

45

None - I am staff

3/27/2015 2:33 PM

46

Georgia

3/27/2015 2:21 PM

47

NSCDA-Maryland Chapter

3/27/2015 2:13 PM

48

Wisconsin

3/27/2015 1:55 PM

28 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q19 What NSCDA Region are you in?

Answered: 48

Skipped: 17

Region 1 (AZ, CA, HI, KS, ...

Region 2 (IA, IL, IN, KY, ...

Region 3 (AL, AR, FL, GA, ...

Region 4 (CT, DC, DE, MA, ...

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Answer Choices

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Responses

Region 1 (AZ, CA, HI, KS, NE, NV, OR, WA)

12.50%

6

Region 2 (IA, IL, IN, KY, MI, MN, MO, OH, WI)

22.92%

11

Region 3 (AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX)

27.08%

13

Region 4 (CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VA, VT, WV)

37.50%

18

Total

48

29 / 30

National Historic House Museum Consortium Impact Survey

Q20 What position best describes your role with your Corporate Society?

Answered: 48

Skipped: 17

Corporate Society...

Corporate Society Muse...

Museum Staff

Other (please specify)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90% 100%

Answer Choices

Responses

Corporate Society President

25.00%

12

Corporate Society Museum Property Chair/Individual Museum House Chair

33.33%

16

Museum Staff

27.08%

13

Other (please specify)

14.58%

7

Total

48

#

Other (please specify)

Date

1

I am a Dame, a museum director of a Dames-affiliated (but not Dames-owned) museum and Region 3 Accreditation chair

6/16/2015 10:40 AM

2

House Museum Chair, History consultant

4/20/2015 2:28 PM

3

I'm not a Dame.

4/14/2015 3:57 PM

4

I am the current MPC Chair, although I will be succeeded by Camilla Burgess in May.

4/8/2015 10:34 PM

5

ex-President, committee chair, active w/ a number of NH preservation organizations, on boards of several

4/3/2015 3:42 PM

6

President, Museum Chair, and Executive Director completed together.

4/3/2015 11:08 AM

7

Volunteer, Research

3/30/2015 12:01 PM

30 / 30