The Chronicle
See Inside Daniel Jones’ Eli Manning connection Page 11
T H E I N D E P E N D E N T D A I LY AT D U K E U N I V E R S I T Y
MONDAY, APRIL 29, 2019 DUKECHRONICLE.COM
FOOTBALL
New York Giants draft Daniel Jones
ONE HUNDRED AND FOURTEENTH YEAR, ISSUE 55
WHO KILLED LIGHT RAIL? The answer may be more complicated than just Duke
By Derek Saul Blue Zone Editor
NASHVILLE, Tenn.—Daniel Jones’ journey from overlooked recruit to NFL quarterback is finally complete. Almost four years after coming to Durham without a guaranteed scholarship, Jones became just the second Duke quarterback to be selected in the first round of the NFL Draft, going to the New York Giants with the No. 6 pick Thursday night. He joins Dave Brown, who was taken with a first-round selection in the 1992 supplemental draft, also to the Giants. Jones is the first Blue Devil to hear his name called by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell in the first round since 2015, when the San Francisco 49ers selected offensive guard Laken Tomlinson with the 26th pick. Jones also is the program’s highest selection in the draft since 1987. “Anytime you make a decision that is something you really want to do, you make a right decision,” Duke head coach David Cutcliffe said. “There’s a joy in watching players who have worked hard and been committed to the process. Daniel Jones embraces something we believe in here–real swag is no swag.” This is not Duke head coach David Cutcliffe’s first time mentoring a highly drafted quarterback prospect. Touted as a quarterback guru, Cutcliffe was Peyton Manning’s offensive coordinator at Tennessee and Eli Manning’s head coach at Mississippi. Each of the Manning brothers were selected first overall in the NFL Draft, went on to win multiple Super Bowl titles and are likely future Hall of Famers. On the Giants, Jones will compete with Eli Manning, Alex Tanney and Kyle Lauletta to earn playing time. Often compared to the Manning brothers, Jones will look to reach a similar level of NFL success.
Juan Bermudez | Sports Photography Editor Daniel Jones was drafted 6th overall.
Selena Qian | Staff Graphic Designer
By Jake Satisky University News Editor
This story is part one in a two-part series about the Durham-Orange light rail. Part one will focus mostly on the non-Duke actors, and part two will concentrate on Duke’s reasons against signing the cooperation agreement. Congressman David Price was “profoundly disappointed” when the light rail died. Price expressed his frustration at the failure of a project that he said “voters, businesses and government leaders overwhelmingly supported” in a news release March 27, the day GoTriangle ended the light rail project. Price has represented a portion of North Carolina’s Research Triangle in Congress every year except two since 1987, and he was a professor at the Sanford School of Public Policy prior to his tenure in the House of Representatives. Price is the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development and Related Agencies, which had the power to give approximately $1.23 billion to Durham and Orange Counties to help fund a light rail spanning from Durham to Chapel Hill. The Durham-Orange County Light Rail Transit project (DOLRT) faced a number of hurdles in its lifetime. GoTriangle—the public transit authority in charge of the project—was working against a tight deadline, the North
Carolina Railroad hadn’t agreed to lease parts of its railroad corridor and costs were skyrocketing. And there was Duke, which was reluctant to sign a cooperation agreement and give up its land near the medical center by Erwin Road for the project. Then the University sent a letter to GoTriangle Feb. 27 that all but killed the light rail. “Notwithstanding these many good faith efforts, it has unfortunately not been possible to complete the extensive and detailed due diligence, by the deadlines imposed by the federal and state governments, that is required to satisfy Duke University’s legal, ethical and fiduciary responsibilities to ensure the safety of patients, the integrity of research and continuity of our operations and activities,” President Vincent Price wrote in the Feb. 27 letter to GoTriangle detailing why Duke would not sign the cooperation agreement. The backlash was swift, with IndyWeek and the New York Times running pieces that pointed fingers at Duke for the light rail’s demise. But the University defended its choice, pointing to potential dangers to the medical center. So who is to blame for derailing the light rail? If you ask Duke, the administration was clear for 20 years that building tracks 100 feet from the medical center was problematic, and GoTriangle wouldn’t
listen. GoTriangle would push back and argue that Duke has been an inconsistent, opaque negotiator that did not make its concerns clear until it was too late. But the University was just one of many entities involved in the pathway to build a light rail connecting Durham to Chapel Hill. “The issue is, it’s really fun and easy to blame Duke,” Executive Vice President Tallman Trask told The Chronicle in late March. “We’re the least of [GoTriangle’s] problems. They’re hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars over budget, even the inflated budget.” Bill Bell, former Durham mayor and IBM senior engineer, described the DOLRT as an AND gate on a computer chip—every input had to come true for the output to be true. GoTriangle had secured cooperation from many of its partners, but in addition to Duke, it still needed Federal Transit Administration funding, state funding, local and private funding and the North Carolina Railroad Company (NCRR)/Norfolk Southern’s cooperation. If everything didn’t break the right way, there would be no light rail. Transit is not a new problem The Triangle—the region anchored by Raleigh, Durham and Chapel Hill—has been See RAIL on Page 3
EMS transports up for this year’s LDOC
Read The Chronicle’s senior columns
Men’s lacrosse falls to Notre Dame
The LDOC chair says there were more EMS transports and decreased attendance compared to last year. PAGE 3
Eleven graduating seniors share their reflections on their times working at The Chronicle. PAGES 6-8, 14-15
A slow start plagues the Blue Devils as they lose to Notre Dame in the ACC semifinals. PAGE 12
INSIDE — News 2 | Sports 4 | Crossword 9 | Opinion 10 | Serving the University since 1905 |
@dukechronicle @dukebasketball |
@thedukechronicle | © 2019 The Chronicle