T H E I N D E P E N D E N T D A I LY AT D U K E U N I V E R S I T Y
The Chronicle
XXXDAY, MONTH THURSDAY, MAY 30, XX,2013 2013
ONE ONEHUNDRED HUNDREDAND ANDEIGHTH EIGHTHYEAR, YEAR,ISSUE ISSUES3 X
WWW.DUKECHRONICLE.COM
JULIA MAY/THE CHRONICLE
ORANGE CRUSHED
by Andrew Beaton THE CHRONICLE
PHILADELPHIA—If it felt like No. 1 seed Syracuse barely had the ball after it nurtured a 5-0 lead against seventh-seeded Duke, it’s because the Orange barely did. Blue Devil faceoff specialist and tournament most outstanding player Brendan Fowler won 13 consecutive faceoffs in the second through fourth periods, allowing Duke to dominate possession en route to a 16-10 victory and the pro-
gram’s second national championship. “I told John [Danowski] after the game to buy his faceoff guy a big steak because he deserved one,” Syracuse head coach John Desko said. “We just couldn’t get the ball in the second half.” The Blue Devils brought home the trophy for the first time since 2010 after reaching championship weekend for seven consecutive seasons—all under head coach John Danowski and since the 2006 season was cancelled amid false allegations of rape.
Although the Blue Devils came out of the gate looking “tight” in the words of Danowski, they went on a 12-1 run in the second through fourth periods to secure a lead and the win. The Orange built a 4-0 advantage in the first period, even though Duke won 3-of-5 faceoffs. Fowler was 2-for-4 in those while getting whistled for a penalty and adjusting to the style of the referees. “I let it get to my head a little bit,” Fowler said. “Once I cooled down a little, and just stuck to what I do every day, I got into
a groove.” The junior then won 15-of-16 faceoffs in the second and third periods as the Blue Devils narrowed the gap and eventually took the lead. He finished the game 20-of-28. “We would say maybe this would be the week Brendan doesn’t win 65 percent of his faceoff and we figure out how to compete, how to win if he doesn’t,” Danowski said. “That day almost never came.” SEE M. LACROSSE ON PAGE 8
Chinese gov. bans Uni. finalizes Central topics in classrooms Campus upgrades by Carleigh Stiehm THE CHRONICLE
Chinese leaders have reportedly banned seven topics of discussion from university classrooms. Duke administrators have received no confirmation that this will impact the academic environment at Duke Kunshan University, said President Richard Brodhead. The Chronicle of Higher Education reported May 22 that the topics—freedom of press, universal values, wealth of government leaders, failures of the Communist party, judicial independence, economic neo-liberalism and civil societies— are banned because they are causing the country’s leaders to lose their ideological grip over students and younger faculty. The article said that the new bans had been decided in February after the nation’s new leaders were announced. “We heard the story, but we have no independent confirmation that this is even going to happen,” Brodhead said. “People don’t
More M. Lacrosse coverage on page 7.
even really know the nature of what we are dealing with here.” He referred to the speculation that the topics have been banned as a “rumor.” Brodhead added that administrators have spoken to several Chinese universities—including Wuhan University, Duke’s partner school in Kunshan—and none have received communication of the ban. “We are aware of the news reports concerning seven educational topics and have been following the issue with our contacts in China,” Mary Bullock, executive vice chancellor of DKU, wrote in an email Saturday. “To be clear: we have not received any written or verbal decree from the Chinese government, nor any indication that one will be coming.” She added that DKU is still in the process of establishment. Although the university was originally set to open in Fall 2011, construction issues have led to delays. The SEE CHINA ON PAGE 6
by Raisa Chowdhury THE CHRONICLE
Originally built as temporary housing in the 1970s, the Central Campus apartments are receiving their last upgrades for the next decade. This summer, the University will complete interior enhancements on apartments as part of the Central Campus enhancement plan that began in Summer 2010, said Joe Gonzalez, dean for residential life. Past upgrades included additions to the campus, such as the creation of Devil’s Bistro and Mill Village, as well as external upgrades, such as repainting the exterior of Central Campus buildings and creating new walkways. The current renovations are focused only on the apartments themselves and invole interior upgrades, such as new floors and paint jobs. The work on Central Campus this summer will cost approximately $5 million, Gonzalez said, adding that the entire Central Campus enhancement project sums up to approximately $14 million.
ONTHERECORD
“It seems as though the current immigration system incentivizes illegal immigration” —Joline Doedens, “Immigration nation.” See column page 11
“It was work that was due,” Gonzalez said. “I mean, these apartments existed for 35 years and it was time for the maintenance to be done.” The interiors of the apartments between Anderson Street and Alexander Avenue were renovated in past summers with new carpets, bathroom doors, interior paint and fencing, among other changes, Gonzalez said. The rest of the apartments will be updated this summer with wood vinyl floors, new interior paint, new bathroom sinks and vanities, stainless steel hoods and refinished cabinets in the kitchen. Gonzalez added that some of the apartments will also be redesigned, transforming some one-bedroom apartments into twobedroom suites to accommodate students who don’t want to share a room—particularly seniors. Work will also continue to replace the outside stairwells on Central Campus— a project that also started three summers SEE CENTRAL ON PAGE 6
Q&A with Holocaust survivor, Page 3