Paper For Above instruction
Perception plays a crucial role in how individuals interpret and respond to their social environment, influencing interpersonal communication significantly. Among the six influences on perception discussed in the course materials, the influence of *schemas* is particularly impactful, as it shapes our expectations and biases based on past experiences and social context. An example from my professional life illustrates how schemas can lead to misperception and affect workplace interactions.
Several months ago, I interacted with a new team member who, due to her reserved demeanor, I initially perceived as aloof or disengaged. This perception was influenced by my schema that associates reticence with disinterest. As a result, I was less inclined to seek her input during team discussions, which inadvertently limited our collaboration. In hindsight, I realize that I could have employed *perception checking*—a term discussed in the course—to verify her engagement before forming a conclusion. Asking open-ended questions about her ideas or experiences would have provided a clearer understanding of her true attitude and fostered better communication.
Conversely, I have experienced being misperceived myself. Once, a colleague assumed I lacked confidence because I was quiet during meetings. This misperception stemmed from her schema linking verbosity with confidence, which did not align with my typical communication style. Recognizing this, I could have actively shared more about my thoughts or provided verbal affirmations to dispel her assumptions. Additionally, demonstrating assertiveness and providing context about my working style could have helped her reframe her perception.
These experiences highlight the importance of *perception management* techniques, such as clarifying assumptions and actively engaging with others, to reduce misunderstandings. Understanding the influence of schemas and applying perceptual checking can significantly improve interpersonal communication by fostering trust and mutual understanding. Overall, awareness and proactive strategies are essential in mitigating misperceptions caused by cognitive biases and interpersonal misunderstandings.
References
Adler, R. B., Rosenfeld, L. B., & Proctor, R. F. (2018). *Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication* (14th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bochner, S., & Morling, B. (2015). *Intercultural communication*. Routledge. Floyd, K. (2018). *Interpersonal communication* (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Hogben, D., & McCroskey, J. C. (2007). Quantitative measures of source credibility. *Qualitative Research Reports in Communication*, 8(1), 63-70.
McCroskey, J. C. (2006). An introduction to Rhetorical Communication. *Hampton Press*.
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2014). *Communication in the classroom*. Routledge.
Scherer, K. R., & Ekman, P. (2014). Approaches to emotion. *Handbook of emotions*, 3, 26-40.
Triandis, H. C. (2018). *Communicating across cultures*. Routledge.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (2011). *Pragmatics of human communication*. W. W. Norton & Company.
Wood, J. T. (2015). *Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture* (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.