2007_11_05_af_iv_c__final_olympia__last by Dimitrios Nikolopoulos

Acronym

OLYMPIA-Magna Graetzia

Title of the project

Modeling and management of natural risks in the regional scale

Type of intervention

Type 1:

'Regional Initiative Project'

Type 2:

'Capitalisation Project'

Colour code white field

Fields to be completed by Applicant

grey field

Fields not to be completed or data automatically transferred / calculated from another field

The Excel protection must not be removed. Damaged Application Forms will be declared ineligible.

-1-

Table of Contents Cover Page General Instructions for filling in the Application Form Checklist for submission Section 1: Project Summary Section 2: Detailed Description of the Project 2.1 Rationale 2.2 Policy context 2.3 Management and coordination Section 3: Components 3.0 Component ‘Preparation activities’ 3.1 Component 1 3.2 Component 2 3.3 Component 3 3.4 Component 4 3.5 Component 5 Section 4: Budget 4.1 Budget overview by budget lines and components (in EUR) 4.2 Payment forecast 4.3 Specification of budget line ‘External expertise and services’ 4.4 Specification of budget line ‘Equipment’ Section 5: Partnership

-2-

General Instructions for filling in the Application Form This Application Form is part of the “application pack” for INTERREG IVC applicants. Before filling in this Form, please also read all programme related documents, especially: a) the INTERREG IVC Operational Programme and b) the Programme Manual . In particular, the Programme Manual will provide you with further guidance on the way to develop an INTERREG IVC project and to prepare the application form. The two above mentionned documents are available on the programme web site (www.interreg4c.net). Paper version Application Form The Application Form must be completed, printed out, dated, signed by a duly authorised representative of the Lead Partner, and stamped with the stamp of the Lead Partner‟s institution. It should be sent together with the annexes (cofinancing statements and project time plan) by mail/courier to the INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat (JTS) at the latest by the end date of the call. This will be checked through the date of postal stamp on the envelope. The JTS address can be found on the programme's web site: www.interreg4c.net

Co-finaning statements Co-financing Statements in original or fax version must be included in the mail sent to the JTS for all partners listed in Section 5 of the Application Form. The standard form of the co-financing statement available on the Programme website must be used, no amendments to the text are allowed. The figures listed in the co-financing statements must correspond to the individual budget figures of each partner given in Section 5 of the Application Form.

Project Time plan A project Time plan must also be included in the mail to the JTS. A template is available on the programme web site but each project is free to propose its own time plan. Electronic version An electronic version of the completed Application Form must be sent by email to the JTS at the latest by the end date of the call at the following address application@interreg4c.net Technical instructions • Applicants are asked to complete only the white fields of this Application Form. For technical reasons, most of the white fields have been split up into 2 or 3 sub-fields. As soon as the first sub-field is filled in, please continue in the next sub-field. • Grey fields are not to be completed. For the grey fields, certain information will automaticaly be transferred to these sections after details are entered in other fields of the Application Form. Formulae for automatic calculations have been included in the relevant fields. These fields cannot be changed or edited. • All input fields (white fields) are locked in order to ensure that all applicants have the same amount of space for describing their project and answering the questions. The number of characters (with spaces) is limited to 1000 characters per field. Any text exceeding this space will not be visible in the printout and therefore cannot be taken into account when assessing the operations. • All input fields must be filled in unless stated otherwise in the instructions field. As different Sections of the Application form depend on the type of interventions, it is strongly recommended that the applicants start by selecting the type of intervention they are applying to. • Certain questions in the Application Form must be answered by marking a tick-box. When clicking on the box, an arrow will appear. Please click on the arrow and select the option provided in the drop-down field, which will appear on the screen. • If you want to use a bullet point list in any of the input fields, please press „Alt+Enter‟.

Application Forms with error messages or with uncompleted Sections will automatically be declared ineligible. -3-

Checklist for submission Please make sure that you have fulfilled the requirements listed below before submitting the documents.

X 1. The electronic version of the completed application form is submitted via e-mail to application@interreg4c.net by the end date of the call at the latest.

X 2. The paper version of the completed application form and the relevant annexes (co-financing statements and project time plan) is sent to the JTS in Lille by the end date of the call at the latest (date of the post stamp).

X 3. All documents are in the working language of the Programme (English). X 4. The paper version includes the completed application form and the relevant annexes (co-financing statements and project time plan) in one single package/envelope.

X 5. The paper version is not bound in order to ease later photocopying for the JTS. X 6. Co-financing statements in original or fax version are submitted for all partners. They are printed on headed note paper, signed, dated and stamped. The standard form presented in the programme manual has been used and no amendments to the text have been made.

X 7. The figures in the submitted co-financing statements correspond to the individual budget figures of each partner given in Section 5 of the application form.

X 8. All partners participating in the operation, i.e. including partners from third countries, are listed in Section 5 of the Application Form with their institutionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s name in original and English languages.

X 9. A project time plan providing a chronological overview of the activities and ouputs is attached. X 10. The Application Form is signed by a duly authorised representative of the Lead Partner. X 11. The Application Form is dated and stamped. X 12. The applicant has verified the compliance of the application with the eligibility criteria of the INTERREG IVC programme described in the Programme Manual.

X 13. The applicant has verified that all fields have been filled in and no error messages appear.

-4-

Section 1: Project Summary

1.1 Acronym:

OLYMPIA-Magna Graetzia

1.2 Title of the project:

Modeling and management of natural risks in the regional scale

1.3 Type of intervention:

Regional Initiative Project

yes

1.4 Duration Please indicate when the operation will start and finalise its activities. Concerning the start date, the following elements should be taken into consideration. Decisions on projects are expected to be taken within five months after the end date of each call. Projects should therefore be ready to start implementation within two months following the date of approval of the operation. For the recommended duration of projects, please refer to the Programme Manual.

Start: beginning of 01 2009

Closure: end of 12 2011

TOTAL N째 MONTHS:

1.5 Sub-theme selected: Please select the sub-theme the project focuses on. Please note that only one sub-theme can be chosen. In cases where several sub-themes are addressed (cross cutting approach), further explanation can be provided under Section 2.1.2 (Problem description/ issue addressed). Priority: 2: Environment and risk prevention Sub-theme: Natural and technological risks (including climate change)

-5-

1.6 Brief summary of the project Please provide a brief summary of the project‟s background, objectives, partnership, main activities and expected outputs and results. It is strongly advised that this field is filled in after the entire Application Form has been completed. Note that should the project be approved, this summary will be published on the programme‟s website. Thus, it should be clear, self-explanatory and without references to other parts of the Application Form or to other documents. The project focuses on the modelling and management of natural risks due to earthquakes, environmental pollution, waste management and floods and fires in the regional scale. The project aims at the confrontation of the resulting damages from natural risks in the regional scale, because these could be excruciating and may be followed by human and material casualties,numerous injuries and other destructive side effects such as consequent floods, limitation of territorial development, negative socio-economical outcomes both in the regional and national scale and even desertification of certain areas. The scientific partners (Technological Educational Institutes of Pireus, Athens and Ionian Islands, Universities of Athens and Aegean, University of Cyprus, GRAM3RA, GUGRI and Polithechic University of Valencia) were involved in developing the project proposal and communicated with the regional policy making partners (municipality of Olympia, Zakintos Prefecture, municipalities of Camisano

Vicentino and Voula) for the further development of the project’s idea in accordance to the regional policy strategies and plans. The main objective of the present project is to create a model for managing natural risks caused by earthquakes, environmental pollution, waste disposal, fires and related floods. The sub-objectives of the project are the development of a theoretical and computation base for the understanding,creation of models for prediction and mitigation of seismic risks,understanding of air pollution mechanisms (radon,suspending particulate matter-CO,NOx,SOx,heavy metals,ozone and photochemical oxidants,air toxics-with estimation of associated risks,understanding of pollution's diffusion mechanisms in groundwater deposits,development of a water pollution surveillance network with a decision support system,use efficient techniques for the identification of pollutant substances in water horizons,development of on-line GIS landfill sitting tool with recycle infrastructures

design of a green area (Olympia) and selection of indexed natural risks based on a real-time GIS dynamical mapping. The project employes crosscutting actions to other priorities (water management, waste prevention and management) and cross-border activities through an Interregional approach between Greece, Italy, Cyprus and Spain. Expected outputs:1.Organisation seminars, site visits, staff exchanges, inter-partner brochure, Experience-knowledge exchange and Dissemination events (Web site,informative leaflets,methodology and technique guides for natural risks,strategic guidelines for confrontation of natural risks, informative, exhibitions and demonstrations to local authorities, regional press conferences, Electronic forum, scientific publications, policy recommendations, GIS for natural risks and a Conference) Expected results 1. Areas which benefit by the model application, improved policies and staff with increased experience.

-6-

1.7 Partnership information Number of partners financed under INTERREG IVC Austria: 0 Belgium: 0 Bulgaria 0 Cyprus: 1 Czech Republic: 0 Denmark: 0 Estonia: 0 Finland: 0 France: 0 Germany: 0 Greece: 9 Hungary: 0 Ireland: 0 Italy: 3 Latvia: 0 Lithuania: 0 Luxembourg: 0 Malta: 0 Netherlands: 0 Poland: 0 Portugal: 0 Romania 0 Slovak Republic: 0 Slovenia: 0 Spain: 1 Sweden: 0 United Kingdom: 0 Total: 14 Norway: 0

Number of partners not financed under INTERREG IVC EU-MS: 0 Switzerland: 0 Others: 0

Overview of project partners (details of the partnership have to be filled in in Section 5) Institution country Partner budget TECHNOLOGICAL ERDF Funding: EU Nat. Cofi Other: EDUCATIONAL LP GR INSTITUTION OF 552.500,00 € 97.500,00 € 0,00 € PIREUS TECHNOLOGICAL ERDF Funding: EU Nat. Cofi Other: EDUCATIONAL P2 GR INSTITUTION OF 127.500,00 € 22.500,00 € 0,00 € ATHENS NATIONAL AND ERDF Funding: EU Nat. Cofi Other: KAPODISTREAN P3 GR UNIVERSITY OF 85.000,00 € 15.000,00 € 0,00 € ATHENS ERDF Funding: EU Nat. Cofi Other: UNIVERSITY OF THE P4 GR AEGEAN 357.000,00 € 63.000,00 € 0,00 € -7-

TOTAL:

650.000,00 € TOTAL:

150.000,00 € TOTAL:

100.000,00 € TOTAL:

420.000,00 €

TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF IONIAN ISLANDS Industrial Systems Institute / Research Centre "Athena" University of Cyprus

ERDF Funding:

85.000,00 € GR

ERDF Funding:

127.500,00 € CY

ERDF Funding:

215.475,00 € P8

P10

P11

P12

P13

University of Catania CRAM3RA

Politechnical University of Valencia - MCFM

PREFECTURE OF ZAKYNTHOS

THE MUNICIPALITY OF VOULA

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCIENT OLYMPIA

MUNICIPALITY OF CAMISANO VICENTINO

396.000,00 €

Prevention of Large Risks P15

ERDF Funding:

112.500,00 € ERDF Funding:

68.000,00 € ERDF Funding:

68.000,00 € IT

ERDF Funding:

60.000,00 €

University Centre for P14 Prediction and

ERDF Funding:

75.000,00 € ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P16

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P17

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P18

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P19

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € -8-

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

15.000,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

0,00 € Other:

22.500,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 € Other:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

100.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

80.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

80.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

25.000,00 €

80.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

20.000,00 €

80.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

12.000,00 €

150.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

12.000,00 €

528.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

12.000,00 €

253.500,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

37.500,00 €

150.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

132.000,00 €

100.000,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

38.025,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

TOTAL:

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 € Other:

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

P20

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P21

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P22

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P23

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P24

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P25

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P26

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P27

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P28

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P29

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P30

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P31

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P32

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P33

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P34

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € -9-

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

0,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

0,00 € Other:

0,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 € Other:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

TOTAL:

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 € Other:

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

P35

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P36

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P37

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P38

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P39

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P40

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P41

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P42

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P43

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P44

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P45

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P46

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P47

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P48

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € P49

ERDF Funding:

0,00 € -10-

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

0,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

0,00 € Other:

0,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

EU Nat. Cofi

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 € Other:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

0,00 € EU Nat. Cofi

TOTAL:

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 € Other:

0,00 € TOTAL:

0,00 €

ERDF Funding:

P50

0,00 €

EU Nat. Cofi

Other:

0,00 €

TOTAL:

0,00 €

1.8 Project budget (in EUR) (based on the partner budget described in Section 5) Amount ERDF Funding National Public Co-financing Total budget eligible to ERDF Norwegian Funding Norwegian Co-financing Total Budget Norway INTERREG IVC BUDGET Other funding TOTAL BUDGET

2.397.475,00 € 524.025,00 € 2.921.500,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 € 2.921.500,00 € 0,00 € 2.921.500,00 €

1.9 Lead Partner confirmation By signing the Application Form the Lead Partner hereby confirms that -

the project neither in whole nor in part has or will receive any other complementary EU funding (except for the funding indicated in this Application form) during the whole duration of the project.

the project is in line with the relevant EU and national legislation and policies of the countries involved.

all partners in the partnership receiving funding from the INTERREG IVC programme (ERDF or Norwegian funding) fulfil the criterion of a public body or a body governed by public law as defined in the Programme Manual.

all partners described in Section 5 of the Application Form are committed to taking part in the projects’ activities

the information is accurate and true to the best knowledge of the Lead Partner

Signature of the Lead Partner FALSE

Name of the signatory Title of the signatory Lead Partner’s institution Date of signature

Official stamp of the Lead Partner’s institution FALSE

Prof. Dr. Athanassios Zisos Vice President ΣΔΥΝΟΛΟΓΗΚΟ ΔΚΠΑΗΓΔΤΣΗΚΟ ΗΓΡΤΜΑ ΠΔΗΡΑΗΑ 14-Jan-2008 -11-

Section 2: Detailed Description of the Project 2.1 Rationale 2.1.1 Brief history of the project Please describe how the project idea and partnership was developed and how the partners were involved in developing the project proposal. The project idea was developed after the forest fires that recently (2007) struck the Ileia prefecture (Greece) and especially OLYMPIA the birthplace of the ancient Olympic Games. The resulting damages in the regional scale were excruciating followed by human and material casualties and numerous injuries. Other destructive side effects are still faced such as consequent floods, limitation of territorial development, negative socioeconomical outcomes both in the regional and national scale and even desertification of certain areas. Similar effects were also faced in the same prefecture 10 years ago (1997) after a series of catastrophic earthquakes. In addition, the territory (of agricultural and industrial economy) faces intense problems of environmental pollution (in surface and ground waters and in indoor-outdoor air) caused by the agricultural and industrial activities. It also faces difficulties in the disposal of wastes. Comparable are the effects of natural risks

(earthquakes, environmental pollution, waste disposal, forest fires and resulting floods) in the nearby prefecture of Zakynthos (Ionian Islands) and, generally, in the Mediterranean Basin (Italy, Cyprus, Spain). Additionally, South Italy and the island of Cyprus, are further characterised by extreme scarceness of surface water due to their karstic geological nature. In the aforementioned logic, Technological Educational Institutes of Pireus, Athens and Ionian Islands, Universities of Athens and Aegean, University of Cyprus, GRAM3RA, GUGRI and Polithechic University of Valencia) were involved in developing the project proposal in the field of mitigation of the effects of natural risks (earthquakes, environmental pollution, waste disposal, forest fires and floods) on human lives and activities in the regional scale. These communicated with the regional policy making partners (municipality of Olympia, Zakyntos Prefecture, municipalities of Camisano Vicentino and Cogoleto) for the

further development of the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s idea in accordance to the regional policy strategies and plans. It should be mentioned that the mitigation of the effects of natural risks is a priority all around the world [1,2]. Among the actions that can be carried out, appropriate modeling and management plays a very important role. The further enhancement in the regional scale benefits the development of innovative strategies which can optimize territorial competitiveness and accumulated wealth. To address effective risk reduction a collaborative approach is required, where managing risk is seen as everyoneâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s business. Thus, with the proposed project, partners from the public and scientific community of South Eastern Europe are going to work in partnership to reduce natural risks contribute to safer communities. 1.Fiorucci, P., Gaetani, F., Minciardi, R. Trasforini, E. Natural risk assessment and decision planning for disaster mitigation Adv. Geosc 2, 161-165, 2005. 2. http://www.cred.be

-12-

2.1.2 Problem description / issue addressed Please describe what problem(s) and/or issue(s) the project will address. Explain the background of the problem(s) / issue(s) and their relevance to the partnership and the INTERREG IVC programme. The project will address in Mediterranean Basin modeling and management of natural risks due to earthquakes, environmental pollution, waste disposal, fires and resulting floods in the regional scale towards the development of innovative strategies. Due to the issue diversity,collaboration of various scientific partners is required working in association with public policy making partners. Earthquakes are the most destructive phenomena of nature.Changes of the electromagnetic field in the interested area occur just before earthquakes and wideband electromagnetic emissions are measured representing a practical parameter for earthquake prediction (epicentre, intensity)[1].Also significant radon release in soil and thermal waters has been observed after earthquakes [2].Modeling and management of such issues will contribute to earthquake prediction and is important for strategies supporting emergency planning and action. Environmental pollution (natural, anthropogenic) occurs in air,

water and soil. Air pollution is due to harmful gases, aerosols and natural gamma radiation. Water and soil pollution is due to soluble chemicals from urban, industrial, agricultural activities and natural sources. Soil and water pollution also occurs due to waste disposal. All issues are of importance for regional environmental policies. The most serious air pollutants are [3]: 1.Radon 2. Suspending particulate matter 3. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 4. Carbon monoxide (CO) 5. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) 6.Sulfur oxides (SOx) 7. Pb and other heavy metals 8. Ozone and other photochemical oxidants.9. Air toxics. Natural sources (e.g. volcanoes, fires, dust storms, plants) emit air pollutants. Car exhausts, central heating systems are anthropogenic pollutants. Pollutant 1 is the most significant as it is the main natural carcinogen and the main source of natural radiation exposure [4]. It is present in soil, rocks, building materials and waters and decays to progeny which attach to

nature due to the catastrophic impact on the affected population. Consequently, modeling and management of the prediction of earthquakes (time, place, intensity) is significant. Significant is also the environmental pollution which is natural or anthropogenic and occurs in air, water and soil. Air pollutants (gases and aerosols) affect harmfully population both outdoors and indoors. Water pollutants are also important both for human consumption and because they affect groundwater quality. Moreover they are necessary for the support of habitat as well as for maintaining the quality of base flow to rivers. Of importance is modelling and management of solid wastes particularly for public authorities. Storage, collection transportation and final deposition are issues of major concern. Landfilling the globally widest disposal method, is used in many countries alongside Mediterranean Basin causing leachate generation, groundwater contamination methane and carbon dioxide (biogas) production.

Soil and water pollution due to waste disposal is a crucial issue for public authorities. Landfilling, chemical and biological processing has been already applied, yet storage, collection transportation and final deposition are the issues of major concern. Decomposition of organic matter combined with iron, mercury, lead, zinc, and other metals from rusting cans, discarded batteries, and appliances (spiced with paints, pesticides, cleaning fluids, newspaper inks, and other chemical) and the fire ignition due to biogas from open or closed landfills are also issues connected to natural risks. All above risks are boosted by fires (and resulting floods) causing environmental damage (e.g. fauna and flora destruction). References 1.Earth Planet Space 54, 1237-1246, 2002 2.Radiat. Meas. 41 634 – 637, 2006 3.The World Bank, World Development Report, 1992, New York, Oxford University Press. 4.UNSCEAR 2000 5.Water Sci Technol 34:41–50, (1994) 6.Sci Tot Envir 294(1–3):41–56, (2002)

-13-

2.1.3 Objectives of the project Please describe the overall objective and sub-objectives of the project. Overall objective: The main objective of the present project is to create a experimental model for managing natural risks caused by earthquakes, environmental pollution, waste disposal, fires and related floods. Expectations from the achievement of this objective are the:1.Improvement of regional policies.2.Regional economic modernization.3.Increase in regional competitiveness through integrated innovative interventions.4.Contribution on safer communities. A target action region is proposed (Ileia Prefecture, Greece especialy OLYMPIA municipality) for which a tangible framework (good practice guide and regional policy recommendation) of a transferability potential is expected to be cooperatively formed. Parallel actions will be undertaken in 3 additional regions (Italy-Sicily, Cyprus-Larnaka, Spain-Valencia) and the framework will be transferred for further development and specialization. General sub-objectives: 1. Forge partnerships and networks among key actors and sectors

involved in natural risk management. 2. Promote policy to advocate for greater attention and commitment to be given to natural risk management by leaders and decision-makers. 3. Improve practice to promote the development of innovative approaches and applications for reducing risk. 4. Manage knowledge and information about good practices, tools and resources for natural risk management. 5. Increase employment within the framework of the prospects that will come about from the introduction of new natural risk reduction methods. 6. Improve quality of life through the application of natural risk reduction methods. Specific sub-objectives: 1. Develop new theoretical and computation base for the understanding, creation of models and prediction of seismic risks. 2. Mitigate seismic risks on the basis of accurate 3-D modeling of earth structure and earthquake sources. 3. Understand the mechanisms of air pollution (radon, suspending particulate matter, VOCs

CO,NOx,SOx,heavy metals,ozone and photochemical oxidants,air toxics) and estimation of associated risks. 4. Understand mechanisms of pollution's diffusion in groundwater deposits. 5. Develop a network of water pollution surveillance stations. 6. Develop a decision support system for groundwater resources management and pollution prevention. 7. Use efficient techniques for the identification of pollutant substances in water horizons, such as phosphates, nitrates, insecticides or pesticides. 8. Develop a dynamical real-time GIS and multi-criteria landfill sitting tool which could be used in other annoyance activities sitting. 9. Recycle infrastructures on GIS base. 10. Design a green area based on the historical significance of Olympia. 11. Selecti indexed natural risks based on a real-time GIS cartography tool.

-14-

2.1.4 Expected outputs and results of the project Please describe the outputs and results the project intends to produce. For further information, please refer to the Programme Manual. ( Outputs are tangible deliverables and visible outcomes or products of the project. They directly result from the activities carried out in the project. Output indicators are typically measured in concrete units such as number of seminars, study visits, conferences, participants, publications, good practices identified, policies addressed. Results are direct and immediate effects resulting from the project and from the production of the outputs. Compared to outputs, results imply a qualitative value. They should be also measured in concrete units such as the number of staff with increased capacity, the number of good practices successfully transferred, the number of policies improved.) OUTPUTS 1.Organisation (joint training seminars, site visits, staff exchanges, organisation inter-partner brochure 2. Experience-knowledge exchange (measurement-study visits, staff exchanges, thematic training seminars, joint on-site studies, joint launches, models (associated with the test areas informative inter-partner brochures 3. Dissemination (Web site, informative leaflets, methodology and technique guides for natural risks, strategic guidelines for confrontation of natural risks, informative CD's

exhibitions and demonstrations to local authorities,regional press conferences, Electronic forum, publications:policy recommendations, Conference:1 For numbers please see Detailed Work plan RESULTS 1. Areas which benefit by the model application, Population covered by the model application, Work positions by the project Employment, policies improved, staff with increased experience-knowledge, good practices in natural risks transferred For numbers please see Detailed Work plan

-15-

2.1.5 Intensity of cooperation Please describe the level of intensity of cooperation that you intend to achieve within your project (see chapter 2.1.1 of the programme manual) The intensity of cooperation of the proposed project will be medium. The cooperation comprises 14 partners from 4 different EU Member States. All partners will be involved and exchange experience for the development of new approaches in the issue of modeling and management of natural risks at the regional scale working in parallel in the proposed regions. The partnership will exploit the exchange, dissemination and transfer of good practices in terms of organisation of joint seminars, study visits, staff exchanges, joint training sessions, production of joint studies and surveys (in the regional scale). The exchange of experience will at first lead to the production of a case study (in OLYMPIA region) for which a regional policy tool (experimental model methodology and action) will be build.

This experimental tool (model) will be a new development approach and will include initiatives (experimental methodologies, techniques and management processes) and communication (development, publication and dissemination of joint leaflets, development of a web site). It is expected to lead to the production of methodology, action and information guides (good practice guides) together with recommendations for possible regional policies and production of strategic guidelines and action plans. The tool will be disseminated among partners(also in other EU members) for specialization and further development and among involved policy making partners. Finally, through the latter partners the model will affect parts of the EU population and even upper level policy makers.

-16-

2.1.6 Approach and methodology Please describe the approach and the methodology (e.g. sequence, combination and interrelation between the activities; logic behind the different Components) proposed to achieve the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x;s objectives and to produce the intended outputs and results. The proposed project approach and methodology is separated into the following 7 Work Packages: 1.Development of Infrastructure Material: a)Research on current situation of the natural risks in each country (Greece, Cyprus, Italy,Spain) of the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s partnership.b)Identification of the organizational structure of public and private institutions that deal with the confrontation of natural risks in each country,c)Identification of the degree of cooperation between public authorities and scientific community in each country,d)Research on current situation of human capital of organizations deal with the confrontation of natural risks in each country,e)Identification of the technologies used by organizations deal with the confrontation of natural risks in each country,f)Identification of best practices worldwide for the confrontation of natural risks,g)Identification of the environmental parameters that affect natural risks, 2.Collection of data for specific risks:

a) Earthquakes Prediction. b) Environmental pollution. c) Fires & Floods. 3. Data analysis and mapping a) Earthquakes Prediction. b) Environmental pollution. c) Fires & Floods. 4. Development of methodological guides - Implementation a. Ileia Prefecture-OLYMPIA a1. Risk analysis and assessment.a2. Indexing of the data collected using prior analysis a3. Modeling in a multi - parameter map of the selected area 2. Transfer and specialization in other areas.5. Evaluation of Project Implementation and Results for further utilizing to the Readjustment of Data and the Fulfillment of Project Objectives a) Design of methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation. b) Draft six-month as well as intermediate and final evaluation reports 6. Dissemination of Project Results and Awareness-raising Activities: a) Creation of a website. b) Design and production of CD-Rom(s). c) Creation of printed information material (flyers, bilingual

printouts, quality printouts, posters, leaflets) d) Organization of exhibitions and demonstrations for local government authorities, public and private authorities, NGOs, social partners and the general public. e) Organization of conferences. f) Creation of a forum and an e-forum. g) Participation in expositions, conferences and workshops h) Create a real time experimental GIS tool for natural risks in Mediterranean Basin.7. Project Administration and Coordination: a) Formation of a central administrative structure. b) Formation of partner local structures. C) Creation of common infrastructure for inter-partner communication (portal). d) Authentication of expenses. e) Organization of national and international Steering Committee and Work Group meetings.

-17-

2.1.7 Components of the project Activities have to be organised logically into a certain number of Components. The description of these Components is provided in Section 3 of the Application Form. For further information on the Components, please refer to the Programme Manual. Applicants are also required to attach a „project time plan‟ to the Application Form providing a chronological overview of the main activities and outputs. The template of the project time plan is available with the application pack on the programme‟s website.

Component 'Preparation Activities'

Component 1

Component 2

Component 3

Component 4

Title Responsible partner

Preparation activities TEI of PIREUS

Title Responsible partner Planned results

Management and coordination TEI of PIREUS A well managed project reaching its objectives, without serious conflict between the partners, without irregularities and with smooth reporting to the programme

Title Responsible partner Planned results

Communication and dissemination TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF Staff with increase capacity:28

Title

Exchange of experiences dedicated to the identification and analysis of good practices

Responsible partner Planned results

TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF 6 regions with benefit

Title

Evaluation of Project Implementation for Readjustment

Responsible partner Planned results

TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF 6 regions with benefit

-18-

Title

Component 5

Responsible partner Planned results

2.1.8 Durability of the project results Please describe how the durability of the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x;s achievements will be ensured. How, when and by whom will the outputs be used and how will they be maintained after the end of the project? How will the results/impacts of the project be sustained? The clustering of several research organisations and local authorities from Italy,Greece,Cyprus and Spain,will lead to exchange of significant experience into the fields of natural risk modeling and management. Problems in natural resources quality are common throughout the INTERREG zone. The demand for natural risk management is continuing to increase as a result of the growing consumption by households, agriculture and tourism. In the Mediterranean areas, the problems are particularly acute.The project proposes integrated strategies for the management of natural risks.An overall quantitative and qualitative assessment of natural resources in the studied regions will be accomplished through this project, which in time will lead to better exploitation of the natural and anthropogenic environment. The project will give the chance to young scientists to gain an insight in the fields of earthquake prediction, air pollution, hydrology, groundwater modeling,

groundwater model validation,waste management,recent communication technologies and improved laboratory analysis and,thus,will offer a great support for their research work.The know-how will be a considerable asset for the establishment of relevant spin-off companies. Dissemination of the results will take not only the standard form of publications and conference presentations, but also through leaflets/brochures/CD's/press conferences/speeches and a web page, so that a wider audience can be reached. The web page will also be a method of exchanging data between the participants.The problems of natural risk management is global and has by no means yet been solved. In order to present the results of this project and to start a dialogue with other researchers in this field, a specialist workshop will be held at the end of the project.The workshop will be addressed to (i) the scientific community,(ii) local and regional authorities, policy makers, and environmental managers. The practical

exploitation of the developed strategies will initially follow wider publication and advertising through the INTERNET and through scientific journals. They will also follow a more dedicated form, of giving demonstrations to interested authorities and decision making organisations. A possible way to promote the developed natural risk monitoring / management system to all interested companies and organisations would be to launch an information campaign a few months before the end of the project.

-19-

2.2 Policy context 2.2.1 Contribution to the programmeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s objectives and to the Lisbon and Gothenburg agendas Please describe how the project will help to achieve the objectives of the INTERREG IVC programme and contribute to the Lisbon and Gothenburg agendas. What added value will interregional cooperation bring in this context? The INTERREG IVC Programme is part of the European Territorial Cooperation Objective of the Structural Fund policies for the period 2007-2013. With focus on encouraging regional and local authorities to view interregional cooperation as a way for enhancing the development, it's overall objective is to improve effectiveness of regional development policies in the areas of innovation, the knowledge economy, the environment and risk prevention, as well as, to contribute to the economic modernisation and increased competitiveness of Europe,through exchange, sharing and transfer of policy experience. That way the successful experiences gained in the different regions can spread throughout Europe.

The project <Olympia>-Magna Graetzia will help to achieve the objectives of the INTERREG IVC Programme, especially the environment and risk prevention, as it will create an experimental model for managing environmental and natural risks caused by environmental pollution, waste disposal, earthquakes, fires and floods, towards the sustainable development of partnerships and networks among the key stakeholders involved in natural risk management, the promotion of policies for greater attention and commitment by leaders and decision - makers to natural risk management, the improvement of practices concerning the promotion of innovative interventions to cope effectively with reducing risk from environmental and natural disasters, the development of a innovative model managing knowledge and information about good practices, tools and resources from environment and natural risk management, the increase of employment and the improvement the quality of life.

The European Union is committed to sustainable development, which involves protecting and improving the quality of environment. That means safeguarding the earth's capacity to support life in all its diversity and respecting the limits of the planet's natural resources. The environmental strategic context rests on several key EU agreements and policies. The strategy for sustainable development (SDS) that was agreed in Gothenburg by the European Council in June 2001, completes the Union's political commitment to economic and social renewal by adding a third environmental dimension to the Lisbon Strategy and establishes a new approach to policy making. This approach is based on the principle that the economic, social and environmental effects of all policies should be examined in a coordinated way. So the project

<Olympia>-Magna Graetzia is consistent with the Lisbon and Gothenburg agendas as it promotes the sustainable development and proposes a methodology that takes into consideration in a coordinated way the economic, social and environmental effects of its actions. The model for managing environmental and natural risks that is going to be created with the actually contribution of all the members of the partnership and with point of report the world crandle of sports and culture Ancient Olympia, which was recently struck by natural disasters (fires). It will be transferred within the partnership for further development and specialisation. During development, all partners will act in the proposed regions cooperatively and supplementary one to the other and will reach the public authorities in order to build safer communities and reduce environmental and natural risks through exchange, sharing and tranfer of their scientific and practical experience.

-20-

2.2.2 Involvement of the relevant policy makers For the Capitalisation Projects, please explain how, in each participating region, the relevant bodies responsible for the Operational Programme will be involved? These explanations will be complementary to the information provided in Section 5 (field â&#x20AC;&#x17E;relevance of the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;). For further information, please refer to the Programme Manual

-21-

2.2.3 Consistency of the project with EU horizontal policies a) Equal opportunities Please state if the project will: have its main focus on equal opportunities X be positive in terms of equal opportunities be neutral in terms of equal opportunities b) Environmental sustainability Please state if the project will: X have its main focus on environmental sustainability be positive in terms of environmental sustainability be neutral in terms of environmental sustainability c) Consistency of the project's theme with EU horizontal policies Please explain how the theme tackled by your project will address directly or indirectly each of the two EU horizontal policies. The project <Olympia>-Magna Graetzia is committed to provide equal opportunities in accordance to the European Union regulations. The meaning is that the outputs and results of the proposed project will affect in the same manner populations without discrimination. It is obvious that the results of the project will offer better opportunities for employment in the examined areas. New jobs will be created consistent with natural risk management while the project partners will be responsible for the dissemination and exploitation of the project's technological outcomes. On the other hand, the proposed project will result in the transfer of technical expertise to the participating EU regions. Scientific knowledge will be obtained in the areas of experimental modeling, model validation, communication systems,software technology, hydrology and hydro-chemical analysis together with eathquakes, air pollution, floods, fires, waste managment and prediction. This, will be a significant

benefit for the educational level of these areas. Thus, they will have equal opportunities to improve their technical knowledge and their professional skills through their participation in this project. As the overall objective of the project is the creation of a experimental model for managing environment and natural risks towards the promotion of sustainable development at regional level, the outputs and results of the project are consistent with the Environmental policies laid down in the Gothenburg Agenda since they are promote environmental protection with a view towards sustainable development. The proposed project gives emphasis on the early diagnosis, prediction and management of natural risks. Predicting and/or stopping the degradation of natural resources at a premature stage is more effective than applying costly restoration measures after the damage has been completed. The project will succeed preventive maintenance of the natural resources through:

(i) continuous monitoring, (ii) methods to deduce trends from the obtained measurements, (iii) the definition of alarm thresholds, (iv) expert knowledge on remediation actions. The project will apply methods for the selection of optimal alarm thresholds. This is important for the minimization of false alarms. If a body of natural resource is wrongly considered to be of poor status unnecessary restoration measures may be taken, wasting considerable amounts of money. Conversely, if because of the wrong data natural resources are considered to have good status, then evidence of deterioration may be overlooked, together with possible damage to the environment and human health. Any such doubts will not only have the adverse effects on decision making, but will also result in a loss of public confidence.

-22-

d) Consistency of the project's implementation with EU horizontal policies Please explain how the day-to-day implementation of your project may address equal opportunities and how it may impact the environment. The day - to - day implementation of project <Olympia>-Magna Graetzia is committed to providing equal opportunities in accordance with the European Union regulations. Within the framework of the project the most qualified individuals will be recruited where needed without race, colour, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, disability, and age distinction. The dissemination activities will be address the relative target groups without any kind of discrimination. Equal opportunities will be given for men and women, by removing existing inequalities which affect women's opportunities. The project leader and all partners will receive advice on equal opportunity as part of the project, at times and locations convenient to them.

As already we have mentioned, the overall objective of the project <Olympia>-Magna Graetzia is the creation of a model for managing environment and natural risks towards the promotion of sustainable development at regional level. So the day - to - day implementation of the proposed project witch consists of six work packages is consistent with the Environmental policies laid down in the Gothenburg Agenda since it promotes environmental protection with a view towards sustainable development.

-23-

2.3 Management and coordination 2.3.1 Coordination a) Will coordination be sub-contracted? b) Details of the coordinator Name Institution Address Postal code Town Country Phone (office) Fax Email

Prof. Dr. Athanasios Zisos TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF OF PIREUS Petrou Ralli & Thivon 250 GR 12244 Athens GR Athens (mobile) 03 210 5381229 gianisz@gmail.com

c) Management and coordination Please describe the main coordination tasks and the way the day-to-day management of the project will be organised. 1. Allocation of responsibilities Project management will be conducted by scheduled appointments of each partner with a representative responsible for the in-time completion of the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s phases. A detailed definition of the obligations of each partner will be necessary for the progress of the project. To this end, 3-monthly management meetings, chaired by the project coordinator, will be organized. For each work-package of the project, a work leader will be appointed and will be charged with the task to deliver to the project coordinator a 3-monthly progress report. 2 Decision Making procedure. Each contractor will appoint a manager with responsibility for completing the work on time and within budget. Further definition of the work required will be agreed at the 3-monthly management meetings. These will be chaired by the coordinator. Decisions will be made by consensus wherever possible, though in the event that a vote is needed, each contractor present will have one vote.

In the event of major changes to the project work (e.g. withdrawn of a partner) an additional management meeting will be called to which the INTERREG Steering Committee representative will be invited. The consortium will seek to resolve problems internally, or by using minor subcontractors. However, the consortium reserves the right to invite additional partners to join the project if this becomes necessary or desirable. 3. System of Communication Communication will be through regular 6-monthly management meetings, supplemented by technical meetings on specific topics. During the project, staff from several different organisations will be working together in the same location. Since this face to face communication is the most effective, the regular management meetings will held only every 6 months. However, every 3 months a written progress report will be required from all partners covering progress against plan and financial expenditures. Written communication will be by email.

4. Information System A web page will be used for the exchange of data between partners and will be maintained where the progress and the results of the project will be exposed. The information system will serve for direct access to useful information and updated knowledge on project issues. 5. Mobilization Project partners will put effort for the dissemination and exploitation of the results. Dissemination will be through publications and conference presentations. An international workshop will be held at the end of the project, aiming at the scientific community and the regional authorities. Partners will launch a campaign so as to promote the results to all interested policy makers and organisations. For exploitation, an exploitation manager dedicated to this project will be appointed. A report on exploitation plans will be provided at the mid-term and at the end of the project. The 3-monthly progress reports will also include any developments on exploitation issues

-24-

a) Will financial management be sub-contracted? b) Details of the Financial Manager Name Institution Address Postal code Town Country Phone (office) Fax Email

Dr.Nikolopoulos Dimitrios TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF OF PIREUS Petrou Ralli & Thivon 250 GR 12244 Athens GR 03 210 5381229 (mobile) 03 6977298318 03 210 5381161 dniko@teipir.gr

c) Financial management Please describe the main tasks of the financial manager and the way the day-to-day financial management of the project will be organised. The main tasks of the financial manager of the project will be the quality control of the financial management of the project partners according to the EU regulations and requirements. The day-to-day financial management of the project will be organised under the financial rights of each country participating in the project and will be under the surveillance of the financial manager. This task is of a great importance because it benefits' the effectiveness of the project and the ongoing collaboration of the project partnership. This will be organised with respect to the day-to-day timetable and the working plan of the staff of each institute participating in the project. The financial manager will be responsible for the accounts, financial reports, the internal handling of ERDF funds and the national co-financing. The financial manager will work in close contract with the coordinator, the controllers and the partners in order to enable efficient financial management of the operation.

The financial manager will be familiar with accounting rules, international transactions, EU and national legislation for the management of ERDF, public procurement and financial control.

-25-

2.3.3 Strategic level Please describe the decision-making, monitoring and evaluation structure of the project, including the composition of the Steering Group, its competences and procedures. Structure of the project: Decision making Decision making for more intense cross-cutting actions will be carried out after meetings between involved partners. An initial meeting will appoint research route and demands. Collected data will be analysed in a specific way to the target of the convenient adaption as inputs in a cartographic tool focused on a environmental sustainable development. Decision making for this action will burden University of the Aegean Dept of Environment and Geography due to they prior experience. The actions will include cartography plotting of all selected risk components in the selected areas. Risk components indexing. Multi - level experimental dynamic maps composition presented risk visualization and relative concern from policy makers. Monitoring. It will comprise 3 Levels 1. Each partner will be responsible for its action monitoring. 2. Project leader will be responsible for the whole project monitoring by organisation working (start,

intermediate, close) meetings between partner action leaders. 3. Total monitoring will carried out after 3-month project reports Evaluation Evaluation in the same formula 3 levels 1. Partner â&#x20AC;&#x201C; cross cutting meetings 2. Leader + partners (start, intermediate, close) 3. Total/ partly from conferences results Composition Selection of partners carried out from universities, labs, and research foundations to process the scientific work of the project (Data collection, data analysis and risk evaluation indexing and visualization). In the other hand selection of the local authorities, municipalities, and others from areas alongside the Mediterranean arc. Competence Steering group partners with expertise in research practices and evaluation according the role undertaken. Selected municipalities and local authorities are the scientific results receivers and applicants. Local authorities

worried on similar problems these are because climate characteristics as earthquakes, fires, floods wastes and because socio-economic characteristics as waste management, air and water pollution etc.

-26-

2.3.4 Roles and tasks among the partners Please describe if there is any division of roles and tasks among the partners as far as coordination is concerned (e.g. partners responsible for administrative and/or financial tasks, components and/or activities). The management and coordination tasks will be carried out by the lead partner as described in section 2.3.4. The leader partner will manage and coordinate not only the implementation and transfer of good practices within partnership but also the financial as well as the communication and dissemination tasks. Specifically regarding communication and dissemination, not only will the lead partner distribute material (CD's,leaflets etc.) but also will coordinate the appropriate tasks of the policy-making (municipalities) and the scientific partners in their specific regions. The role of the lead partner will be organisational and task acting. On the other hand, each partner will define a certain work leader (good practice manager) and a communication (and dissemination) manager. Both managers will have the task of implementing the appropriate tasks organised by the lead partner to the regional scale. All partnersâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; managers will meet the corresponding managers of the lead partner and work

in close contact with them. These managers will specialise the tasks in the regional scale and transfer upwards to the specific implementation issues. Each partner will also define a financial controller as described in 2.3.1.c. The involved staff of each partner will bemotivated and act according to the instructions of the corresponding coordination, financial and communication managers of the partner. The staff will transfer to all managers the partial implementation issues and will work in close relation to them for the effective fulfilment of the projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s aims and objectives. During the knowledgegood practice transfer, each partner will act (according to this partner's prooved good-practice) cooperatively with the partners or similar expertise in the specific region partner's Country. Those partners demanding knowledge transfer for model development and specialisation, will be associated by the expertise (in these field) partners. The latter will travel and transfer the know-how

on-site (site visits/ joint studies/ pilot actions) or through educational seminars. If needed, the transfer will continue through the expected e-forum or the web -page

-27-

Section 3: Components 3.0 Component ‘Preparation activities’ Title Preparation activities Total eligible costs 30.000,00 € Responsible partner TEI of PIREUS Please describe the preparation activities which have taken place The preparation activities were the following: 1. Development of the project idea. 2. Partner search 3.Development of e-forum 4.Coordination 5.Meetings with partners 6.Completion of the Application Form. Clarifications: 1.Development according to 2.1.1 2.A core of partners (scientific/public) in Greece was contacted. The lead partner searched partners via email and phone. 3. Upon partners’ participation acceptance an e-forum was developed and coordinated by the lead partner for the inter-partner communication. 4. The lead partner mobilized and organized the partners for the collection of data needed.5. Organized and coordinated by the lead partner 6. Implemented by the lead partner, the University of the Aegean and the Institute of Industrial Systems (Greece). with partners 6) Completion of the Application Form. 1 was developed according to the description given in 2.1.1. (Persons: Dr. Nikolopoulos 15,000.00 Euros, Dr.Vogiannis Efstratios 8,000 Euros, External service 7,000 Euros)

3.1 Component 1 3.1.1 Component main features Title Total eligible costs Responsible partner Planned results

Management and coordination 183.450,00 € TEI of PIREUS

A well managed project reaching its objectives, without serious conflict between the partners, without irregularities and with smooth reporting to the programme

Output indicators

Indicators Average number of Steering Committee (SC) meetings organised per year

Target 2

3.1.2 Component general description Information on the way the management and coordination will be carried out has to be provided in Section 2.3 of the Application Form.

-28-

3.1.3 Detailed work plan (if no activities and outputs are planned in a semester, please indicate â&#x20AC;&#x17E;not applicableâ&#x20AC;&#x; in the relevant fields).

Activities Jan-Jun 2008

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2008

Output(s)

1. Formation of a central administrative structure, 2.Formation of partner local structures, 3.Creation of common infrastructure for inter-partner communication (portal), 4.Authentication of expenses,5.Organisation of national and international Steering Committee and Work Group meetings

Activities Jan-Jun 2009

1) Number of participants: 7 2)Number of participants: 7 3)Number of participants: 7 4)Number of participants: 7 5)Number of participants: 6, Number of Steering Meetings : 1

Output(s)

-29-

1.Authentication of expenses, 2.Organisation of national and international Steering Committee and Work Group meetings

Activities Jul-Dec 2009

1) Number of participants: 7 1) Number of participants: 6, Number of Steering Meetings : 1

Output(s)

1.Authentication of expenses, 2.Organisation of national and international Steering Committee and Work Group meetings

Activities Jan-Jun 2010

1) Number of participants: 7 1)Number of participants: 6, Number of Steering Meetings : 1

Output(s)

1.Authentication of expenses, 2.Organisation of national and international Steering Committee and Work Group meetings

Activities Jul-Dec 2010

1) Number of participants: 7 1)Number of participants: 6, Number of Steering Meetings : 1

Output(s)

-30-

1.Authentication of expenses, 2.Organisation of national and international Steering Committee and Work Group meetings

Activities Jan-Jun 2011

1) Number of participants: 7 1)Number of participants: 6, Number of Steering Meetings : 1

Output(s)

1.Authentication of expenses, 2.Organisation of national and international Steering Committee and Work Group meetings

Activities Jul-Dec 2011

1) Number of participants: 7 1)Number of participants: 6, Number of Steering Meetings : 1

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2012

Output(s)

-31-

Activities Jul-Dec 2012

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2013

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2013

Output(s)

-32-

Activities Jan-Jun 2014

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2014

Output(s)

-33-

3.2 Component 2 3.2.1 Component main features Title Total eligible costs Responsible partner Planned results

Output indicators

Communication and dissemination 790.600,00 € TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF PIREUS

Staff with increase capacity:28

Indicators

N° of press releases disseminated N° of brochures created N° of copies of brochure disseminated N° of newsletters created N° of copies of brochure disseminated N° of dissemination events organised N° of other events participated in Possible additional output e-forums

Target 4 6 30000 0 0 8 8 4

indicators

Result indicators

Indicators N° of articles/appearances in press and media Estimated n° of participants in events Average n° of visits per month on operation’s website

Possible additional result indicators

-34-

Target 4 28 100

3.2.2 Component general description Please describe the content of this Component in further detail (e.g. issue tackled, proposed approach, nature of the planned activities). For further information on the Components, please refer to the Programme Manual. Communication and dissemination will take the standard format of scientific publications, conference presentations, leaflet/brochures/informative CDâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s distribution, organisation of joint lunches, development of a web site for dynamical data presentation/inter-partner information exchange, organisation and implementation of press conferences/ public dialogue, organisation of a specialist conference for the dissemination of scientific data to the public authorities/general population and the production of methodological guides for the confrontation of natural risks/good practice guides/action-policy recommendations. The expected overall-dissemination aim will be the exploitation of the good practices and experiences (successfully transferred within scientific partnership) at first to the public-authority partners (municipalities and communities) and, through them, to the local population (through a door-to-door leaflet/brochure approach, an open dialogue, or, organisation of speeches

/seminars/local information points/contacts) and to the upper level policy authorities/makers (through official contacts). From the latter authorities it will be possible to transfer the good practices to populations of a wider basis achieving transferability aside from the regional scale offering, in that manner, benefits to the overall population of South-Eastern Europe. Project partners themselves will put effort for the dissemination and exploitation of the results in their local area. Partners will also launch a campaign so as to promote the results to all interested policy makers and organizations. Communication and dissemination will be managed by the Lead Partner. The lead partner will manage/mobilize the overall tasks as well as reports on exploitation plans/actions in the local scale which will be provided at the mid-term and at the end of the project from each partner. For better exploitation, an exploitation manager dedicated to this project will be defined.

Each partner will also define a communication and dissemination manager dedicated to the organization of communication and exploitation actions in the local scale. The 3-monthly progress reports will also include any developments on exploitation issues Moreover the web page and the information system will serve for direct access to useful information and updated knowledge on project issues.

-35-

3.2.3 Detailed work plan (if no activities and outputs are planned in a semester, please indicate „not applicable‟ in the relevant fields).

Activities Jan-Jun 2008

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2008

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2009

Output(s)

1.Research on current situation of the natural risks in each country (Greece, Cyprus, Italy) of the project’s partnership. Also research on current desertification risks, 2. Identification of the organizational structure of public and private institutions that deal with the confrontation of natural risks in each country. Also identification for desertification risks 3. Identification of the degree of cooperation between public authorities and scientific community in each country. Also identification for desertification risks, 4.Research on current situation of human capital of organizations deal with the confrontation of natural risks in each country. 5.Identification of the technologies used by organizations deal with the confrontation of natural risks in each country. 6.Identification of best practices worldwide for the confrontation of natural risks. 7. Identification of the environmental parameters that affect natural risks.

1.Number of Reports: 4 ,Number of participants: 12, 2.Number of Reports: 4 ,Number of participants: 15, 3.Number of Reports: 4 ,Number of participants: 18, 4.Number of Reports: 4 ,Number of participants: 11, 5.Number of Reports: 4 ,Number of participants: 14, 6.Number of Reports: 4 ,Number of participants: 17, 7.Number of Reports: 4 ,Number of participants: 19

-36-

1.Creation of a website, 2.Design and production of CD-Rom(s), 3.Creation of printed information material (flyers, bilingual printouts, quality printouts, posters, leaflets), 4.Organisation of exhibitions and demonstrations for local government authorities, public and private authorities, NGOs, social partners and the greater public, 5.Organisation of conferences, 6.Creation of a forum and an e-forum

Activities Jul-Dec 2009

Output(s)

Number of participants: 18, Number of publications : 2, Number of printed material : 1, Number of copies : 7500, Number of seminars : 2, Number of exhibitions/speaches: 2, Number of interregional events : 2, Number of participants in events : 125, Number of press releases: 2,Number of policy reccomendations : 2, Number of e-forums : 1

Activities Jan-Jun 2010

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2010

Output(s)

-37-

Activities Jan-Jun 2011

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2011

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2012

Output(s)

-38-

Activities Jul-Dec 2012

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2013

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2013

Output(s)

-39-

Activities Jan-Jun 2014

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2014

Output(s)

-40-

3.3 Component 3 3.3.1 Component main features Title Total eligible costs Responsible partner Planned results

Output indicators

Exchange of experiences dedicated to the identification and analysis of good practices

1.820.000,00 € TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF PIREUS

6 regions with benefit

Indicators N° of interregional events (seminars, workshops, study visits, etc.) organised by the project to exchange experience N° of participants in these interregional events N° of good practices identified

Target 49 10 25

N° of regional/local policies and instruments addressed in the field tackled by the operation

Possible additional output indicators

Result indicators

Indicators

Target

N° of staff members with increased capacity (awareness / knowledge / skills) resulting from the exchange of experience at interregional events

N° of good practices successfully transferred

N° of regional/local policies and instruments improved in the field tackled by the operation

Possible additional result indicators

-41-

3.3.2 Component general description Please describe the content of this Component in further detail (e.g. issue tackled, proposed approach, nature of the planned activities). For further information on the Components, please refer to the Programme Manual. The exchange of knowledge/good-practice and expertise will be carried out through bi-directional actions (horizontal, vertical). The horizontal action will be for the experience share between scientific partners and the vertical action for the exchange between local authorities. Horizontal actions. (Acts between research institutions) Study visits: Partners of similar expertise will act at the specific Country regions implementing the good practices (e.g data collection). These partners will implement cooperatively and in close contact to the Lead partner. When actions should be undertaken for which knowledge transfer should be performed other partners will take the responsibility of good practice tranfering. Towards this purpose, study visits/ pilot measurements/ joint studies for experience and good practices sharing will take place targeting to a homogenous way of data collection and recording. In parallel if it considered necessary that researchers will be travel among

regions sharing knowledge and practices between research groups. Meetings: Horizontal meetings will be organised among partners working in the same expertise (earthquakes, water pollution, wastes, etc). The scope will be the knowledge diffusion and the coordination of the work. Meetings. In the proposed every six-month meetings, knowledge, good practices, innovation and other scientific findings will be shared among partners in a third level of project dissemination. Scientific participants will analyse and share experience gain from specific area investigation. Horizontal actions. (Acts between communities) Meetings: Local authorities with representatives will organize working meetings aimed their experience share. Experience got from prior fires, floods, earthquakes, pollution etc confrontation or the organisation faced natural disasters and pollution. Ascertain of scientific support demand will be another important meeting issue. Web awareness: Existing municipalitiesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; web

sites could be an easy way for experience and good practices diffusion. Project web site could be connection point throw it scientific information flows to local leaders. (vertical action) Vertical actions (acts between research groups and local leaders) Vertical actions are composed of good practices and policy making tool transfer from research structure to the local authoritiesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; level. It will be succeeded by research results transferring after completion of the specified work packages. Transferring process could be achieved by vertical meetings organization, this will be performed in 2 levels Level 1, working groups and leaders from municipalities under investigation. Working groups and local leaders will be in a two way co-operation transferring results and accommodations focusing to the projects aims progress. Level 2, Collected experience and results carried out from working groups concerning widest research areas will be diffused to local policy makers in conferences.

-42-

3.3.3 Detailed work plan (if no activities and outputs are planned in a semester, please indicate â&#x20AC;&#x17E;not applicableâ&#x20AC;&#x; in the relevant fields).

Activities Jan-Jun 2008

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2008

Output(s)

All methodologies described in section 2.1.6 for Workpackages 2,3 and 4.

Activities Jan-Jun 2009

Number of participants: 21, Number of site visits : 8, Number of publications : 2

Output(s)

-43-

All methodologies described in section 2.1.6 for Workpackages 2,3 and 4.

Activities Jul-Dec 2009

Number of participants: 21, Number of site visits : 8, Number of publications : 2

Output(s)

All methodologies described in section 2.1.6 for Workpackages 2,3 and 4.

Activities Jan-Jun 2010

Number of participants: 21, Number of site visits : 8, Number of publications : 2

Output(s)

All methodologies described in section 2.1.6 for Workpackages 2,3 and 4.

Activities Jul-Dec 2010

Number of participants: 21, Number of site visits : 8, Number of publications : 2

Output(s)

-44-

All methodologies described in section 2.1.6 for Workpackages 2,3 and 4.

Activities Jan-Jun 2011

Number of participants: 21, Number of site visits : 8, Number of publications : 2

Output(s)

All methodologies described in section 2.1.6 for Workpackages 2,3 and 4.

Activities Jul-Dec 2011

Number of participants: 22, Number of site visits : 9, Number of publications : 6

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2012

Output(s)

-45-

Activities Jul-Dec 2012

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2013

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2013

Output(s)

-46-

Activities Jan-Jun 2014

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2014

Output(s)

-47-

3.4 Component 4 3.4.1 Component main features Title Total eligible costs Responsible partner Planned results

Evaluation of Project Implementation for Readjustment

97.450,00 â&#x201A;Ź TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF PIREUS

6 regions with benefit

Output indicators

Indicators Number of partcipants

Number of interregional events

Result indicators

Target

Indicators Number of partcipants

Target 42

Number of visits in web site Number of Publications

100 12

Number of methodological guidelines

-48-

3.4.2 Component general description Please describe the content of this Component in further detail (e.g. issues to be tackled, proposed approach, nature of the planned activities). For further information on the Components, please refer to the Programme Manual. Each partner should design methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation. This tool design will be in accordance of specific issues undertaken by each partner. In general project evaluation will be carried out in the level of each partner conducting the work packages by 1. Draft six - month reports. Working diary, includes staff, actions, results and anything useful for project - part evaluation 2. Maps, models, web sites as research evidence 3. Intermediate report thoroughly illustrated up to now the work done 4. Final reports after the end of each planned action. 5. For cartography action maps and models work as reports

Conferences will put in their agenda the evaluation of projectâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s progress. Evaluation process will be for each working package, partner, and the total project. A general evaluation report will be produced on the round-table discussion among partner representatives at the conference closure. In the other hand prospective way will be drought out. Close conference is responsible for total project evaluation. The degree of good practice diffusion among partners in the horizontal dimension and from research teams to the public authorities is of major importance. The aim to visualization the collected data in hazardous thematic maps is to create a useful tool. This will help public and authorities to perceive and confront risks from various natural and anthropogenic hazards, and natural disasters. Efficiency degree will be the utility of the cartographic tool delivered to the local policy makers

Project manager will keep all the report copies collected after each action deadline and summarize them for the next conference agenda.

-49-

3.4.3 Detailed work plan (if no activities and outputs are planned in a semester, please indicate â&#x20AC;&#x17E;not applicableâ&#x20AC;&#x; in the relevant fields).

Activities Jan-Jun 2008

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2008

Output(s)

1.Design methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation, 2.Draft sixmonth as well as intermediate and final evaluation reports

Activities Jan-Jun 2009

Number of participants :7, Number of interregional events: 1

Output(s)

-50-

1.Design methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation, 2.Draft sixmonth as well as intermediate and final evaluation reports

Activities Jul-Dec 2009

Number of participants :7, Number of interregional events: 1

Output(s)

1.Design methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation, 2.Draft sixmonth as well as intermediate and final evaluation reports

Activities Jan-Jun 2010

Number of participants :7, Number of interregional events: 1

Output(s)

1.Design methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation, 2.Draft sixmonth as well as intermediate and final evaluation reports

Activities Jul-Dec 2010

Number of participants :7, Number of interregional events: 1

Output(s)

-51-

1.Design methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation, 2.Draft sixmonth as well as intermediate and final evaluation reports

Activities Jan-Jun 2011

Number of participants :7, Number of interregional events: 2

Output(s)

1.Design methodological guidelines for the evaluation of the project throughout the duration of its implementation, 2.Draft sixmonth as well as intermediate and final evaluation reports

Activities Jul-Dec 2011

Number of participants :7, Number of interregional events: 2

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2012

Output(s)

-52-

Activities Jul-Dec 2012

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2013

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2013

Output(s)

-53-

Activities Jan-Jun 2014

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2014

Output(s)

-54-

3.5 Component 5 3.5.1 Component main features Title Total eligible costs Responsible partner Planned results

0,00 â&#x201A;Ź

Output indicators

Indicators

Target

Result indicators

Indicators

Target

-55-

3.5.2 Component general description Please describe the content of this Component in further detail (e.g. issues tackled, proposed approach, nature of the planned activities). For further information on the Components, please refer to the Programme Manual.

-56-

3.5.3 Detailed work plan (if no activities and outputs are planned in a semester, please indicate â&#x20AC;&#x17E;not applicableâ&#x20AC;&#x; in the relevant fields).

Activities Jan-Jun 2008

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2008

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2009

Output(s)

-57-

Activities Jul-Dec 2009

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2010

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2010

Output(s)

-58-

Activities Jan-Jun 2011

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2011

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2012

Output(s)

-59-

Activities Jul-Dec 2012

Output(s)

Activities Jan-Jun 2013

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2013

Output(s)

-60-

Activities Jan-Jun 2014

Output(s)

Activities Jul-Dec 2014

Output(s)

-61-

Section 4: Budget

4.1 Budget overview by budget lines and components (in EUR) Please provide a detailed budget by budget line and component for the partners from the EU-MS and Norway to be financed under INTERREG IVC. The amounts for the budget categories “External expertise and services” and “Equipment” have to be provided under Sections 4.3 and 4.4. Figures reported under these Sections will automatically be transferred into the table below. For further information concerning the definition of budget lines and components, please refer to the programme manual. Preparation activities

CP1 Management and coordination

CP2

CP3

Communicatio Exchange of n and experiences dissemination dedicated to the identification and analysis of good practices

CP4

CP5

Evaluation of Project Implementatio n for Readjustment

TOTAL per budget line

EUR

Staff 20.000,00

86.933,64

532.226,53

910.494,07

60.345,76

0,00

1.610.000,00

55,11 %

3.000,00

31.934,09

139.857,21

286.724,63

16.984,08

0,00

478.500,01

16,38 %

0,00

39.908,59

99.042,58

348.928,67

20.120,16

0,00

508.000,00

17,39 %

7.000,00

24.673,68

19.473,68

155.352,63

0,00

206.499,99

7,07 %

0,00

118.500,00

0,00

118.500,00

4,06 %

183.450,00

790.600,00 1.820.000,00

0,00 97.450,00

0,00 0,00

0,00 2.921.500,00

0,00 %

30.000,00 1,03 %

6,28 %

3,34 %

0,00 %

100 %

Administration Travel and accommodation External expertise and services (see 4.3) Equipment (see 4.4) Sub-projects EUR %

TOTAL per CP

27,06 %

62,30 %

100 %

Remark: if preparation costs are reported, Section 3.0 must be filled in.

4.2 Payment forecast Please provide in the table below the expected amounts to be paid and reported by semester. EUR %

Jan-Jun 2008 Jul-Dec 2008 Jan-Jun 2009 Jul-Dec 2009 Jan-Jun 2010 Jul-Dec 2010 Jan-Jun 2011 0,00 0,00 200.000,00 597.000,00 531.125,00 531.125,00 531.125,00 0,00 % 0,00 % 6,85 % 20,43 % 18,18 % 18,18 % 18,18 %

EUR %

Jul-Dec 2011 Jan-Jun 2012 Jul-Dec 2012 Jan-Jun 2013 Jul-Dec 2013 Jan-Jun 2014 Jul-Dec 2014 531.125,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 18,18 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 % 0,00 %

Total

2.921.500,00 Preparation costs to be added in first reporting period

-62-

4.3 Specification of budget line â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;External expertise and servicesâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; Contracting partner

Partners with whom costs are to be shared (if applicable)

Description of external expertise / services to be contracted

Amount (EUR)

Preparation

Service by Panayiotaras Dionysios

5.500,00

Service by Patsoules Theodoros

1.500,00

Sub-total Service by Patsoules Theodoros Researcher

7.000,00

20.000,00

4.673,68

Component 1 Sub-total Researcher

24.673,68 19.473,68

Component 2 Sub-total

-63-

19.473,68

Contracting partner

Partners with whom costs are to be shared (if applicable)

Description of external expertise / services to be contracted

Amount (EUR)

Service by Panayiotaras Dionysios

20.000,00

Researcher

3.000,00

Researcher

47.500,00

Coordination,events ,financial control,software,translation

72.000,00

12.852,63

Researcher

Component 3 155.352,63

Sub-total

0,00

Component 4

Sub-total

-64-

Contracting partner Description of external expertise / services to be contracted

Partners with whom costs are to be shared (if applicable)

Amount (EUR)

Component 5 Sub-total Total

-65-

0,00 206.499,99

4.4 Specification of budget line ‘Equipment’ Contracting partner

Description of ‘Equipment’

Amount (EUR)

Preparation 0,00

Sub-total

0,00

Sub-total

0,00

Component 1

Sub-total

Component 2

-66-

Contracting partner

Description of â&#x20AC;&#x2DC;Equipmentâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;

Amount (EUR)

Component 3

CR-39 SSNTD's for passive radon measurement

5.000,00

Active Radon Monitor for earthquake prediction and environmental risks

25.000,00

Spectrum analyser

7.500,00

Spectrum discriminator

5.000,00

Highresolution,panchromatic,multispectral satellite (ICONOS,QUICKBIRD) maps

20.000,00

Computers

5.000,00

Sensors for wireless communication network

7.500,00

2 laptos for in situ measurements

7.500,00

Alpha Guard detector

2.600,00

CR-39 SSNTD's for passive radon measurement

2.400,00

IT and computer equipment

26.000,00

Sub-total

5.000,00 118.500,00

Sub-total

0,00

Sub-total Total

0,00

Ancillary equipment for Radon detector

Component 4 Component 5

-67-

118.500,00

Section 5: Partnership Contact details of the Lead Partner Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 * NUTS Level 2 * NUTS Level 3 * Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

ΣΔΥΝΟΛΟΓΗΚΟ ΔΚΠΑΗΓΔΤΣΗΚΟ ΗΓΡΤΜΑ ΠΔΗΡΑΗΑ TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF PIREUS Body governed by public law Petrou Ralli & Thivon 250 GR 12244 Athens GR ATTIKI Attiki Attiki

03 210 5381229 (mobile) 03 6977208318 03 210 5381161 dniko@teipir.gr www.teipir.gr Dr. Dimitrios Nikolopoulos, Prof.Dr. Athannasios Zisos, Vice President Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf Control will be through an internal certified public accountant

Bank details Bank name Address Postal code Town Country IBAN SWIFT code Internal reference Holder of the account

AGRICALTURAL BANK OF GREECE DIMARCHIOU 1 AND CONSTANTINOUPOLEOS 12244 EGALEO GR GR55-0431-4100-0038-9030-0201-141 ABGR GRAA Prof. Constantinos Cantzos

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

650.000,00 € 552.500,00 € 97.500,00 € -68-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? In the case of a Norwegian Lead Partner, please justify the reason why this partner has to be the Lead Partner. The Technological Institution of Pireus (TEIP) is an institution belonging to the Greek Ministry of Education and Religions Affairs. The Administrative Committee of TEIP is based on Egaleo and covers the fields of Computer Science, Electronics, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Automated Systems and Architecture. Its mission is to run interdisciplinary research programs and provide education curricula for undergraduate, graduate and continuing education students. It provides appropriate equipment and administrative infrastructure needed for management/mobilization of the overall and individual partner tasks and for reporting on exploitation plans/actions in the regional scale. It has also appropriate financial network with specialised staff needed for the financial management of the project. In this manner, TEIP will be able to coordinate the administrative, financial, good practice exchanging as well as the dissemination tasks needed for the successful implementation of

the project. TEIP has experience in studying earthquake risks as electromagnetic variations prior to seismic events. It has equipment and experience in radon research needed for the management of seismic and environmental pollution risks. It has also equipment and experience in computer programming, which will be used in all phases of the project (eg. signal and data processing in earthquakes prediction, risk analysis and assessment, web site and GIS development). TEIP will contribute in the management of natural risks caused by earthquakes and environmental pollution through supporting of awareness-raising and emergency planning actions, developing and coordinating observatories for the better understanding and finally developing actions for minimising natural risks. It will benefit from the project through the exchange of experience, the specialization from the knowledge transfer in the interregional scale and from the coordination, communication and dissemination practices.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). TEIP was/is a participant of numerous projects financed by the EU (e.g. ERASMUS, SOCRATES, CLEAN MAG, ARCHIMEDES). Information can be found in the following web pages: 1) http://w3i.teipir.gr/sl/TEI-EE/ECTS/ 2) http://gun.teipir.gr/~kalgar/CleanMag/cleanmag.html 3) http://archimedesrd.teipir.gr . TEIP has/is a collaborator in MSc Educational courses in the national level (University of the Aegean-1, University of Athens-3, University of Pireus-1, Universities of Paisley-1 and Kenducy-1, City University of Washington state-1 and HERIOT WATT-1). Available information is found in web page http://gdias.teipir.gr/postgrad.htm. It has also founded the Centre of Technological Reserch (http://ikaros.teipir.gr/tp/research/ActionLINC.htm) and has orginised conferences and workshops(http://ikaros.teipir.gr/tp/conf.htm)

The postal address of the partner determines the selection of the NUTS levels. A list to all NUTS levels is available under http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nuts/codelist_en.cfm?list=nuts

-69-

Contact details of partner 2 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

ΣΔΥΝΟΛΟΓΗΚΟ ΔΚΠΑΗΓΔΤΣΗΚΟ ΗΓΡΤΜΑ ΑΘΖΝΑ΢ TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF ATHENS Body governed by public law AG. SPIRIDONOS 12210 EGALEO ATHENS GR ATTIKI Attiki Attiki

03 210 5385763 03 210 5385304 cnomicos@teiath.gr www.ee.teiath.gr Prof. C . NOMICOS

(mobile)

Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf Control will be through an internal certified public accountant

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

150.000,00 € 127.500,00 € 22.500,00 €

If, in exceptional case, the participation of this partner is not to be financed from INTERREG IVC but from its Convergence or Competitiveness programmes (see programme manual for further information), please click in the box below:

-70-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partner‟s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? TEI of Athens-TEIA has a long lasting (since 1982) experience in studying earthquake risks as electromagnetic variations prior to seismic events, including relationships between the precursory signal patterns and the preceding seismic activities and developing signal and data processing solution for earthquakes prediction. During the last five years a telemetric network is operated in Greece, measuring the electromagnetic field variations (EMV) at low and high frequencies using tuned loop antennas in low frequencies (LF) ( 3-10 kHz) and λ/2 dipoles in high frequencies (HF) (41 and 46 MHz). The developed technology is based on a data logger, which digitizes and stores the information. This network uses the already existing field facilities network of 11 digital field stations spread almost all over Greece. The communication of the new stations is based on a real time telemetry using leased telephone lines. By using multiplexing technique the seismological data are transferred in real

time at the baud rate of 9600 bits/s and simultaneously seven others information streams. The telemetric system has been designed to work unattended. TEIA will contribute in the management of natural risks caused by earthquakes through supporting of awareness-raising and emergency planning actions, developing and coordinating observatories for the better understanding of earthquakes and finally developing actions for minimising seismic risks. TEIA will benefit from the project through the exchange of experience with the other seismic-risk working partners, the specialization from the knowledge transfer in the interregional (as well as the regional) scale and through the communication and dissemination practices which will be followed and especially specially for those concerning the contact with probably sensitive populations and policy making public authorities.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). TEI of Athens-TEIA has experience in Structural Funds financed projects. TEIA has cooperated in 16 research funds cofinanced at the rate of 75% for EU and additional 3 projects finaced 100% by Greek Authorities. TEIA has also experience in interregional cooperation through 1 one finaced project of Greek-German cooperation and has also experience in financed projects in the whole of the Greek territory (3 projects). During the last five years TEIA has collaborated in 8 finaced projects in 3 of which it was the coordinator.

-71-

Contact details of partner 3 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

EΘΝΗΚΟ ΚΑΗ ΚΑΠΟΓΗ΢ΣΡΗΑΚΟ ΠΑΝΔΠΗ΢ΣΖΜΗΟ ΑΘΖΝΩΝ NATIONAL AND KAPODISTREAN UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Body governed by public law Panepistimioupolis ZOGRAFOU 15784 Athens GR ATTIKI Attiki Attiki

03 210 7276733 03 210 7276733 ceftax@phys.uoa.gr

(mobile)

Ass. Prof. Eftaxias Constantinos Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf Control will be through an internal certified public accountant

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

100.000,00 € 85.000,00 € 15.000,00 €

-72-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? A twenty years experience in both the theoretical and experimental activities on identifying pre-seismic electromagnetic anomalies in various frequency bands (from DC-ULF up to VHF) provides the specific background of the University of Athens-UOA for this project. Presently UOA is collaborating with other teams as well in Greece. This has as a result the existence of a telemetric network of approximately 12 EM measuring stations (from ULF up to VHF) of precursory EM anomalies. The role of UOA in this project will be to contribute and support of TEA (partner 2) in analysing and processing EM anomalies for pre-seismic fingerprints (inputs to WP 2200) and to provide the characteristics of the EM signals to be monitored (inputs to WP 1500). In particular, concerning the scientific part, UOA expertise will perform data analysis using modern methods for noise separation. Specific effort will be focused on the understanding and modelling of fracture through the experiment in order to

establish criteria for EM pre-seismic signal detection. UOA will contribute (as the close collaborating partner 2) in the management of natural risks caused by earthquakes through supporting of awareness-raising and emergency planning actions, developing and coordinating observatories for the better understanding of earthquakes and finally developing actions for minimising seismic risks. UOA will benefit from the project through the exchange of experience with the other seismic-risk working partners, the specialization from the knowledge transfer in the interregional (as well as the regional) scale and through the communication and dissemination practices which will be followed and especially specially for those concerning the contact with probably sensitive populations and policy making public authorities.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). UOA has experience in Structural Funds financed projects. UOA has cooperated in many research funds cofinanced by EU or finaced 100% by Greek Authorities. The partner of UOA (partner 3) has gained experience form 5 funded projects, one of which was a Chech-Greek collaboration (i.e. in the Interregional scale). Two other projects were financed for collaboration between Greece ang Georgia. The partner of UOA has also experience in financed projects in the whole of the Greek territory as has this partner's research collaborator parner 2.

-73-

Contact details of partner 4 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

ΠΑΝΔΠΗ΢ΣΖΜΗΟ ΑΗΓΑΗΟΤ UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN Body governed by public law LOFOS PANEPISTIMIOU GR 81100 MYTILINI GR NISIA AIGAIOU, KRITI Voreio Aigaio Lesvos

03 22510 36700 (mobile) 03 22510 36709 ru@aegean.gr www.aegean.gr/rc Prof. Vitsilaki Chryssi, Vice-Rector Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf Control will be through an internal certified public accountant

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

420.000,00 € 357.000,00 € 63.000,00 €

-74-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partner‟s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The Geography of Natural Disasters Laboratory is a research unit in the Department of Geography (DG). Its mission is to i) run interdisciplinary research programs on natural disasters and civil protection; ii) provide relative education curricula for undergraduate, graduate and continuing education students; and iii) disseminate information to the profession and public through service and outreach. It performs academic and research activities in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), satellite remote sensing and applied latgeo-informatics on environmental hazards management-including wildland fires. Laboratories are equipped with lates technology hardware and software infrastructure, including specialized apparatus and stations. The Waste Managment Laboratory (WML) is an integral part of the Department of Environmental Studies.The research focuses on the following areas: i)Estimation of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of waste ii) Study of Waste Management Systems

(WMS) and database generation using GIS qualitative characteristics of waste ii) Study of WMS and database generation using GIS, iii) Siting.The research program of the Waste Management Laboratory (WML) focuses on: i)Estimation of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of waste ii) Study of WMS and database generation using GIS, iii) Siting Methodology for MSW and hazardous waste management facilities and other environmentally hazardous activities, iv) Design of sanitary landfills, material recovery facilities, municipal and industrial wastewater treatment facilities, facilities' monitoring and operation, v) Application of linear and integer programming tools for the economic and environmental vi) systems Mathematical modeling of environmental systems vii) Strategic analyses and planning of WMS with special emphasis on: a) environmental management of enterprises and public/private organisations, b) life cycle analysis of natural resources, products and wastes, and c) Product

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). Eco-labeling. WML focuses also on: i)natural radiation environment, ii) dispersion of radioactive isotopes in the environment, and iii) risk assessment and analysis. There are currently 26 ongoing research projects funded by the EU dealing with waste and hazardous management. The partners will contribute to the content of the cooperation by providing expertise and will benefit from the mutual exchange of experiences and practices. Until the present moment the University of the Aegean, as an international research oriented university, had successfully participated in 20 projects of the Interreg initiative (1.646.500,00€ IIIA, 1.750.000,00€ IIIB) in the scientific fields of environmental studies, ICT’s, multimedia and design, humanities, Mediterranean studies, making the UoA a pioneering and competitive institution at Greek and European level.

-75-

Contact details of partner 5 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

ΣΔΗ ΗΟΝΗΩΝ ΝΖ΢ΩΝ TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION OF IONIAN ISLANDS Body governed by public law 56 SYGROU AV. GR 11742 ATHENS GR KENTRIKI ELLADA Ionia Nisia Zakynthos

03 210 9250280 03 210 9250290 gramde@teiion.gr http://www.teiion.gr Effie Skotti

(mobile)

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

100.000,00 € 85.000,00 € 15.000,00 €

-76-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partner‟s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The department of the Ecology & the Environment branch of TEI of IONIAN islands provides laboratory facilities for the environmental quality monitoring, as well as a GIS lab for the implementation of the project. All the analytical equipment provided at the moment has been financed at 75% by the European Regional Development Fund and at 25% by National Resources, and put on very recently – on April 2007

The TEI of IONIAN ISLANDS (TIO) is a newly established institution founded in 2003 and belongs to the Greek Ministry of Education and Religions Affairs. The Administrative Committee of TIO is based on Athens while the Departments are spread in three Ionian Islands (Kefallinia,Zakynthos and Lefkada) and cover the following scientific fields: Environment, Biological Agriculture,Administration,Public Relations,Sound Technology,Information Technology.TIO hosts 2.400 students whereas the total number of the educational staff members is about 250.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). From 2005 TIO belongs to ERASMUS MAP and is participating in European programs concerning education and training such as SOCRATES – ERASMUS, LEADER+ and three INTERREG projects, the INTERREG TRIANET (partner of agrotourism and biological cultivation projects), the INTERREG Development and promotion for organic farming producting systems and the INTERREG "cooperazione nel campo della ricerca dello sviluppo e del trasferimento delle technologie".

-77-

Contact details of partner 6 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

Ηνστιτούτο Βιομητανικών ΢σστημάτων / Δρεσνητικό Κέντρο "Αθηνά" Industrial Systems Institute / Research Centre "Athena" Body governed by public law Patras Science Park 26504 Platani Patras bld GR KENTRIKI ELLADA Dytiki Ellada Achaia

03 2610 910302 (mobile) 03 2610910303 ger9711@ath.forthnet.gr http://www.isi.gr Dr. Rigatos Gerasimos (Researcher) Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf Control will be through an internal certified public accountant

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

150.000,00 € 127.500,00 € 22.500,00 €

-78-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The Industrial Systems Institute is a public equivalent body with scientific and technological objectives which operates under the supervision of the Greek Secretariat for Research and Technology. The research activities of the Institute are: (i) industrial communication systems, (ii) industrial software, (iii) embedded systems, (iv) intelligent automation. The fields of technological activity of the Institute are: (i) real-time information and communication systems for industrial applications (ii) modelling and control of industrial systems (iii) integrated production systems and large scale systems (iv) embedded systems (v) industrial software. The proposed project requires advanced techniques for modelling the groundwater regime and for the in-time risk diagnosis and the efficient risk management. Moreover, there is need for reliable methods for data collection and transmission. It is clear that the technological expertise of ISI serves the project's goals.

ISI has worked in close cooperation with Ministries, Governmental agencies and European and International organizations, providing environmental management inputs for the development and implementation of national strategies and action plans. ISI team will be in close collaboration with the rest of the partners by providing and gaining knowledge in the field of groundwater management, collect the necessary information and will be involved in measuring the water pollution. Initialization, selection and preparation of the test region. Use of past hydrogeological data to initialize the models. Installation of the distributed measurement stations. Selection of sensors to measure groundwater parameters (salinity, pH, temperature, conductivity). Selection of the equipment for the detection of groundwater pollution (trace elements, hydro-chemical analysis). Development of a wireless communication network. Data filtering

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). Industrial Systems Institute (ISI) research work is relevant to the objectives and the technical approach of the project. The Industrial Systems Institute carries out research on machine learning for system modelling and control. Environmental and large scale systems are among the fields of application of this research work. Selection of relevant publications: 1. G.G. Rigatos and Q. Zhang, Fuzzy Model Validation using the Local Statistical Approach, IEEE SMC Intl. Conf., Hammamet, Tunisia, 2002. Selection of relevant projects. Title: Low-Cost Catastrophic Event Capturing (LOCCATEC), Contract number: IST-2000-29401 ,Programme: IST 2000, Coordinator: Tardito Costruzioni e Impianti Srl, Budget (Euros): 3.337.496 Start: 1-Sep-2001, Duration (Months): 36, Results: A data recording and transmission system for building damages caused by earthquakes.

-79-

Contact details of partner 7 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

Πανεπιστήμιο Κύπροσ University of Cyprus Body governed by public law 75 Kallipoleos Str, P.O. Box 20537 1678 NICOSIA CY KYPROS / KIBRIS Kypros / Kibris Kypros / Kibris

0357 22 892275, 892697 (mobile) 0357 22 892295,892701 dfatta@ucy.ac.cy, pattichi@ucy.ac.cy

0357 99 313906

Dr. Despo Fatta Kassinos, Dr. Constantinos S. Pattichis Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. Cyprus has opted for a decentralised control system. Beneficiaries will select a controller from a short list of private control bodies set up by the following body: Planning bureau, George Georghiu, 29 Byron Avenue, 1409, Nicosia, Cyprus Tel: +35722602814 Fax: +35722666810 Email: ggeorghiu@planning.gov.cy

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

253.500,00 € 215.475,00 € 38.025,00 €

-80-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The main activities of GAIA, Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, cover the development of systems for prevention and control of environmental pollution, the development of programs for the integrated management of wastewater and solid waste, the development and application of inventory programs concerning the production of solid waste (municipal and industrial) and industrial wastewater, the development of appropriate schemes for the integrated management of municipal solid waste and other priority waste streams at a local and national level, life cycle analysis, development of green technologies, risk assessment applied for environmental decision making and solid waste management etc. GAIA has worked in close cooperation with competent Ministries, Governmental agencies and European and International organisations, providing environmental management inputs for the development and implementation of national strategies and action plans. GAIA team will be in close collaboration

with the rest of the partners by providing and gaining knowledge in the fields of water and waste, collect the necessary information and will be involved in measuring the physicochemical characteristics of water in the areas under concern. The Department of Computer Science worked extensively in measurements of ionizing radiation and environmental monitoring, performing radon measurements all over the free part of the island of Cyprus. The work has been published. Furthermore, they have supervised University final year students whose assignment lay in the same field. Their work was also published. The experience gained will help in setting-up a new main station to perform environmental and other measurements, which will be analyzed by members of the group. The group aims towards developing a data bank of information and examining possible correlation with EMF measurements and examine whether there is a correlation with earthquake signals, in order to set up a warning system.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). GAIA has extensive experience in European Projects: LIFE projects:(1)Development of methods and tools for the establishment of good environmental performance in the tourist accommodation sector in Jordan,(2)Life Cycle Assessment as a Decision Support Tool for the ecoproduction of olive oil,(3)Sustainable Construction in Public and Private Works through IPP approach, COST Action 636:Xenobiotics in the urban water cycle, ESF: Nitrogen in Europe, Assessment of current problems and future solutions. The Department of Computer Science has participated in many projects in collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency, involving participants from at least 20 Member States and handled all financial matters. From February 2005 to April 2007 they have been involved in a European Union funded project, SENTINEL, whereby monitoring of patient doses for different diagnostic examinations were requested and simultaneously monitoring the image quality of the diagnostic images.

-81-

Contact details of partner 8 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

Università degli Studi di Catania - CRAM3RA University of Catania - CRAM3RA Body governed by public law Viale Andrea Doria, 6 95125 Catania IT ISOLE Sicilia Catania

039.095.7385201 039.095.330424 info.cram3ra@unict.it www.unict.it/cram3ra Prof. Vito Librando

(mobile)

039.333.5418817

Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. The first level control has carried out in compliance with Italian specific control requirements (the information is not available in the updated version of "Country Specific Control Requirements" by InterregIVC website.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

75%

528.000,00 € 396.000,00 € 132.000,00 €

-82-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? Considered that the technical and scientific experimental competences of CRAM3RA in environmental field are diffused in different Departments and Faculties of the University of Catania, the role of CRAM3RA is in analysis, monitoring and mitigation methodologies for environmental risk with an interdisciplinary and synergic approach, although centred on the environmental chemical science. Besides, the CRAM3RA has the ability to communicate on the processes related to organization and innovative management of environmental risk, acting in the phase of research and advancement and in the application of applied methodologies. The CRAM3RA can also contribute to the content of the cooperation promoting the dissemination of results, organizing conferences and workshops and coordinating research activities and studies of analysis and environmental monitoring.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). The CRAM3RA is a new research center not participating in previous Interreg IIIC projects, but its technical and scientific staff was already involved in other research and academic projects financed by European Funds, and actually is high motivated in the opportunity to become partner of a new team submitting a Interreg IVC project proposal.

-83-

Contact details of partner 9 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE VALENCIA - CMMF Politechnical University of Valencia - MCFM Body governed by public law Camino de Vera s/n 46022 Valencia ES ESTE Comunidad Valenciana Valencia / València

034 96 387 98 90 (mobile) 34 96 387 79 81 mgarcia@gmmf.upv.es ; rperez@gmmf.upv.es www.gmmf.upv.es ; www.upv.es Marta Garcia Martin (Projects Manager);Rafael Perez García (Director) Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. Decentralised control through internal public accountants of Universidad Politecnica de Valencia certified at national level

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

75%

150.000,00 € 112.500,00 € 37.500,00 €

-84-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The CMMF (Multidisciplinary Center of Fluids Modelling) has a wide experience in the research about water and air. The main topics are related with water supply systems (analisys, design, operation and management), but also in water an air quality and pullution. One of the most important research lines that the CMMF is developing now is about Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Intelligent Information Systems and Data Minig, and its environmental applications.

The CMMF (Multidisciplinary Center of Fluids Modelling) can contribute with its expertise in all all the tasks related with models and environmental techniques (Water and air), as well as in horizontal tasks, directed to the intelligent management of the obtained information. The CMMF has experience also in the organization of meetings and congresses at international level, and also in dissemination and diffusion of the scientific and technic information (publications, websites, etc.).

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-85-

Contact details of partner 10 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

ΝΟΜΑΡΥΗΑΚΖ ΑΤΣΟΓΗΟΗΚΖ΢Ζ ΕΑΚΤΝΘΟΤ PREFECTURE OF ZAKYNTHOS Regional Public Authority Dioikitirio Zakynthos GR 29100 Zakynthos GR KENTRIKI ELLADA Ionia Nisia Zakynthos

03 2695-3-60392 03 2695-3-60392 dionisisrallatos@yahoo.gr

(mobile)

03 6976-768783

Dionisis Rallatos Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

80.000,00 € 68.000,00 € 12.000,00 €

-86-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The prefecture of Zakynthos will serve as a receptor of the methodological and good practice guides for the confrontation of natural risks in the regional scale. This partner will help the scientific (good practice producing) partners in their communication tasks regarding the part of the EU population that resides in Zakynthos. The partner will help in the dissemination of the produced outputs i.e. distribution of leaflets/brochures/newsletter/informative CD's, organisation of public speeches/seminars, organisation of press conferences. The partner will provide the scientific partners with population data (address, telephones etc.) and will help in a door-to door approach for the guide difussion. In adittion, the partner will receive the policy recommendations of the project and will try to promote these to the higher level of policy and decision making public organisations and authorities. The partner will take into consideration the project's outputs and will act appropriately for

the optimisation of the quality of life in regional scale. In this manner, the partner will succeed in the better environmental mangement and in the confrontation of natural risks. The partner will also benefit in financial terms anticipating satisfactory natural risks.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-87-

Contact details of partner 11 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

Γήμος Βούλας THE MUNICIPALITY OF VOULA Local Public Authority 18 KONSTANTINOU KARAMANLI AVENUE GR 16673 Voula GR ATTIKI Attiki Attiki

03 2108953851 (mobile) 03 2109657131 dapostolopoulos@dimosvoulas.gr www.dimosvoulas.gr Dimitris Apostolopoulos- Department of EU programmes Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

80.000,00 € 68.000,00 € 12.000,00 €

-88-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The municipality of Voula (Attica region, Athens, Greece) has the activities of development and maintenance of the necessary material and technical infrastructure for the safe and sound operation of the city, of rendering of services to its residents in the areas of entertainment, culture, athletics, education, environment and social protection etc, of application of civil protection programmes. This partner will serve as a receptor of the methodological and good practice guides for the confrontation of natural risks in the regional scale. This partner will help the scientific (good practice producing) partners in their communication tasks regarding the part of the EU population that resides in Voula. The partner will help in the dissemination of the produced outputs i.e. distribution of leaflets/brochures/newsletter/informative CD's, organisation of public speeches/seminars, organisation of press conferences. The partner will

provide the scientific partners with population data (address, telephones etc.) and will help in a door-to door approach for the guide difussion. In adittion, the partner will receive the policy recommendations of the project and will try to promote these to the higher level of policy and decision making public organisations and authorities. The partner will take into consideration the project's outputs andwill act appropriately for the optimisation of the quality of life in regional scale. In this manner, the partner will succeed in the better environmental mangement and in the confrontation owill act appropriately for natural risks. The partner will also benefit in financial terms anticipating satisfactory natural risks.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). The Department for E.U. Affairs and Programmes of the Municipality of Voula with the collaboration of D.E.A.V. has been implementing projects with EU financial contribution on areas such as Information & Communication Technologies (I&CT), combating social exclusion, town twinning, information campaigns and dissemination events, environmental protection etc.

-89-

Contact details of partner 12 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

ΓΖΜΟ΢ ΑΡΥΑΗΑ΢ ΟΛΤΜΠΗΑ΢ MUNICIPALITY OF ANCIENT OLYMPIA Local Public Authority P Spiliotopoulou 11 GR 27065 Ancient Olympia GR KENTRIKI ELLADA Dytiki Ellada Ileia

03 26240 22549, 22250 0 3 26240-23124 aolympia@otenet. gr

(mobile)

3 6972 827805

Panagiotis Flessas Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. According to Country Specific Control Requirements, (EU-27 + Norway), Updated version, Status: 19/12/07, Greece has not specified yet the country’s specific requirements for first level control http://www.interreg4c.net/load/Country_Specific_Control_Requirements.pdf

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

85%

80.000,00 € 68.000,00 € 12.000,00 €

-90-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The municipality of Olympia (Ileia prefecture) will serve as a receptor of the methodological and good practice guides for the confrontation of natural risks in the regional scale. This partner will help the scientific (good practice producing) partners in their communication tasks regarding the part of the EU population that resides in Ileia. The partner will help in the dissemination of the produced outputs i.e. distribution of leaflets/brochures/newsletter/informative CD's, organisation of public speeches/seminars, organisation of press conferences. The partner will provide the scientific partners with population data (address, telephones etc.) and will help in a door-to door approach for the guide difussion. In adittion, the partner will receive the policy recommendations of the project and will try to promote these to the higher level of policy and decision making public organisations and authorities. The partner will take into consideration the project's outputs and

will act appropriately for the optimisation of the quality of life in regional scale. In this manner, the partner will succeed in the better environmental mangement and in the confrontation owill act appropriately for natural risks. The partner will also benefit in financial terms anticipating satisfactory natural risks. The outputs regarding the confrontation of fires and floods is a crucial issue for this partner (for the Olympia Region) due to recent (summer 2007) fires which damaged the physical environment in unextended level affecting the environmental, social, economical and cultural quality of life.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any). There are three ongoing EU financed 2002-2006 projects in this partner.

-91-

Contact details of partner 13 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

COMUNE DI CAMISANO VICENTINO MUNICIPALITY OF CAMISANO VICENTINO Local Public Authority Community of Camisano Vicentino CAP 36043 Camisano Vicentino IT NORD-EST Veneto Vicenza

0044 419914 (mobile) 0044 419960 segreteria@comune.camisanovicentino.vi.it Eleftherios Prezalis, Mayor Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. The first level control has carried out in compliance with Italian specific control requirements (the information is not available in the updated version of "Country Specific Control Requirements" by InterregIVC website.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

75%

80.000,00 € 60.000,00 € 20.000,00 €

-92-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? The municipality of Camisano Vincentino will serve as a receptor of the methodological and good practice guides for the confrontation of natural risks in the regional scale. This partner will help the scientific (good practice producing) partners in their communication tasks regarding the part of the EU population that resides there. The partner will help in the dissemination of the produced outputs i.e. distribution of leaflets/brochures/newsletter/informative CD's, organisation of public speeches/seminars, organisation of press conferences. The partner will provide the scientific partners with population data (address, telephones etc.) and will help in a door-to door approach for the guide difussion. In adittion, the partner will receive the policy recommendations of the project and will try to promote these to the higher level of policy and decision making public organisations and authorities. The partner will take into consideration the project's outputs and

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-93-

Contact details of partner 14 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller

Consorzio inter-Universitario (C.U.G.RI.) University Centre for Prediction and Prevention of Large Risks Body governed by public law P.zza V. Emanuele – Penta di Fisciano 84080 - SA - ITALY 84080 Fisciano IT SUD Campania Napoli

39089964087 (mobile) 39089968900 g.bevento@unisa.it:;v.bovolin@unisa.it www.cugri.unisa.it Giuseppe Benevento; Vittorio Bovolin

39 338 707 1249

Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection. The first level control has carried out in compliance with Italian specific control requirements (the information is not available in the updated version of "Country Specific Control Requirements" by InterregIVC website.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

75%

100.000,00 € 75.000,00 € 25.000,00 €

-94-

Please describe the relevance of this partner in the proposed project: What are the partnerâ&#x20AC;&#x;s competences and experiences in the field tackled? How will the partner contribute to the content of the cooperation and benefit from it? C.U.G.RI. is a consortium between the Universities of Salerno and Napoli established in 1993. C.U.G.RI. mission is to supply operational, technical and financial help to the associated, in the field of the prediction and prevention large risks, particularly in sectors of: geology, geotechnical, hydraulic engineering, structural engineering and industrial engineering C.U.G.RI. is financially and administrative independent from the two partner Universities: the administrative base is in Penta di Fisciano near the main Campus of the University of Salerno. C.U.G.RI. operates through two operational bases one in Penta di Fisciano and the other in Napoli. C.U.G.RI. is governed through a Directive Board and a Scientific Board each Board is composed by 6 members (3 nominated by each University Rectors). The 2 Boards are renewed every 3 years.

C.U.G.RI. activity is funded through contracts with both public and private organization. As non-profit scientific Institution C.U.G.RI. also funds Research Grant for young researchers and the purchase of scientific equipment for the Laboratories of the two partner Universities. C.U.G.RI. through many contracts has developed a large expertise in the field of hydrology and hydraulics and in the monitoring of natural resources.

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-95-

Contact details of partner 15 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-96-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-97-

Contact details of partner 16 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-98-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-99-

Contact details of partner 17 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-100-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-101-

Contact details of partner 18 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-102-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-103-

Contact details of partner 19 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-104-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-105-

Contact details of partner 20 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-106-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-107-

Contact details of partner 21 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-108-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-109-

Contact details of partner 22 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-110-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-111-

Contact details of partner 23 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-112-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-113-

Contact details of partner 24 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-114-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-115-

Contact details of partner 25 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-116-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-117-

Contact details of partner 26 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-118-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-119-

Contact details of partner 27 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-120-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-121-

Contact details of partner 28 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-122-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-123-

Contact details of partner 29 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-124-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-125-

Contact details of partner 30 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-126-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-127-

Contact details of partner 31 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-128-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-129-

Contact details of partner 32 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-130-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-131-

Contact details of partner 33 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-132-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-133-

Contact details of partner 34 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-134-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-135-

Contact details of partner 35 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-136-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-137-

Contact details of partner 36 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-138-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-139-

Contact details of partner 37 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-140-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-141-

Contact details of partner 38 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-142-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-143-

Contact details of partner 39 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-144-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-145-

Contact details of partner 40 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-146-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-147-

Contact details of partner 41 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-148-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-149-

Contact details of partner 42 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-150-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-151-

Contact details of partner 43 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-152-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-153-

Contact details of partner 44 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-154-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-155-

Contact details of partner 45 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-156-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-157-

Contact details of partner 46 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-158-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-159-

Contact details of partner 47 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-160-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-161-

Contact details of partner 48 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-162-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-163-

Contact details of partner 49 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-164-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-165-

Contact details of partner 50 Institution (original language) Institution (EN) Legal status Address Postal code Town Country NUTS Level 1 NUTS Level 2 NUTS Level 3 Phone (office) (mobile) Fax Email Website Contact person Independent financial controller Please indicate the way you plan to carry out the first level control. Please refer to the country specific information section on the INTERREG IVC website for further details concerning the country specific requirements for first level control. If already known (and selection is not subject to public procurement), the contact details of the independent controller should be provided. Otherwise, just indicate the type of controller and procedure for selection.

Partner budget (in EUR) ERDF co-financing rate: Total amount: ERDF Funding: EU National Co-financing:

0,00 € 0,00 € 0,00 €

-166-

Please describe the previous experience of the partner in interregional cooperation and Structural Funds financed projects (if any).

-167-