Indiana Energy Conservation Code Fiscal Impact Assessment - Summary Report by Daniel Overbey

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY EDITION 1.00 FEBRUARY 4, 2021

Prepared by Ball State University 2000 West University Avenue Muncie, IN 47306 Browning Day 626 North Illinois Street Indianapolis, IN 46278 Pepper Construction 1850 West 15th Street Indianapolis, IN 46202

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY EDITION 1.00 FEBRUARY 4, 2021

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 2

COPYRIGHT Copyright © 2021 by Daniel Overbey. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form on by an electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review.

DISCLAIMER None of the parties involved in the funding or creation of this study assume any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use of or reliance on any information contained within this document. This study is based on a unique body of work during a specific period of time and the results may not be consistent in other applications.

TRADEMARK ASHRAE® is a registered trademark of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 3

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 7 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 8 RESEARCH AND POLICY BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................................................................................... 11 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................... 12 EXPLANATION OF KEY FINDINGS .......................................................................................................... 16 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 24 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................................. 25

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 5

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Indiana Energy Conservation Code Fiscal Impact Assessment (IECC-FIA) and the following summary has been made possible through the efforts of many professional contributors. The authors wish to thank the following companies for their support:

Principal Investigator Daniel Overbey, AIA, LEED Fellow

Other Contributors1 (alphabetical) TWG Development, Management and Construction

Primary Contributors Primary Investigator and Primary Contributors are collectively referred to henceforth as “the authors.”

Special Thanks (alphabetical by last name)

Ball State University John Bates Browning Day Amanda Doenges Pepper Construction Toju Eshedagho Secondary Contributors (alphabetical)

John Hawkins Susan Heinking

Heapy Engineering Josh March Michael Timberlake Treus Sestoso Jason Shelley Calvin Young Joseph Yount

Various subcontractors / suppliers provided input regarding specific portions of this study. These companies are known

to the research team; however, the names of the companies have been withheld from this report by request.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 7

INTRODUCTION The following report summarizes the scope, methodology, and key findings of the Indiana Energy Conservation Code Fiscal Impact Assessment, henceforth referred to as IECC-FIA. The fiscal impact assessment and summary was developed by Ball State University in collaboration with a team of Indiana-based professionals from the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry as a public service to assist in future policy decisions with regard to the state’s energy code.

represent the majority of nonresidential construction in the State of Indiana. 2.

The three case studies were building projects recently completed within the state. For each case study, the research team assessed the fiscal impact of changing these recently completed projects to meet three subsequent editions of energy standard that the 2010 IECC is based off of, which is ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2007 - Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings3. Standard 90.1 has a three-year update cycle. Therefore, the IECC-FIAS assessed the three case studies for compliance with the 2010, 2013, and 2016 editions of Standard 90.1. In many cases, the requirements of the 2010 IECC no longer meet the current market standard. Therefore, the comparison between the asbuilt condition of the three case studies and the three subsequent editions of Standard 90.1 represent a skewed comparison but nevertheless reflect the current market condition and meet the requirement of the fiscal impact study.

The IECC-FIA was developed as an independent effort comprised of Ball State University faculty research and pro bono contributions from AEC professionals. The report did not receive any external funding. Disclaimer The State of Indiana requires a fiscal impact statement when a new rule or statute is being considered for adoption. In anticipation of future policy decisions regarding the state’s 2010 energy code, Ball State University initiated this voluntary study as a public service to the people of Indiana. Ball State University is a public research university based in Muncie, Indiana. The university’s R. Wayne Estopinal College of Architecture and Planning offers leading degree programs in architecture, landscape architecture, urban planning, and construction management and interior design. As such, the institution has the expertise and is well-positioned to develop this study based on professional judgement and the expected standard of care for the building design and construction industry.

While this study is representative of the real approximate difference in cost between the scenarios compared, it should not be used a metric for design for the building typologies represented by the three case studies. The time-adjusted costs were based on the specific qualities and parameters of the projects as they were designed and constructed. It can be argued that the methodology used to determine the real costs differences would not accurately reflect the realized market construction cost differences. However, for the purposes of this study, the important element is the determination of whether constructing the three build case study projects per ASHRAE 90.12010, 2013, or 2016 compared to 2007 (with Indiana amendments) has a fiscal impact. Even using a large probability of effort in the costs, the results of the IECC-FIAS would remain as stated in the Summary for Policymakers.

The IECC-FIA was conducted as a “comparison” analysis in accordance with the precedent set by the Fiscal Impact Report for the Indiana Department of Homeland Security, which was issued in September 2009 as a fiscal impact assessment for the current 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code (2010 IECC)2. The report was obtained by public request and has been induced in the appendix of this report. The intent of the IECC-FIA was two-fold: 1.

Further examine the three case studies in order to assess the potential energy cost savings of updating the state’s energy code.

Assess the fiscal impact of designing and constructing three building projects that

State of Indiana. Article 19: Energy Conservation Codes. 2010. <http://www.in.gov/legislative/iac/T06750/A00190.PDF> (last accessed 24 January 2021).

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and AirConditioning Engineers. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.12007: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: ASHRAE, 2007.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 8

RESEARCH AND POLICY BACKGROUND Indiana Energy Conservation Code Fiscal Impact Assessment (IECC-FIA) The State of Indiana requires a fiscal impact statement when a new rule or statue is being considered for adoption. Ball State University, in collaboration with local professionals from the architecture, engineering, and construction industry, has voluntarily performed a fiscal impact study of updating the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code (2010 IECC) as a public service to the people of Indiana.

(LEED) rating system and numerous other green building certification frameworks. ASHRAE currently maintains a three-year update cycle for the standard. As such, the 2007 edition of the standard was updated by the 2010 edition, which was followed by the 2013 edition, etc. IECC-FIA Studied Three Update Cycles (“Steps”) For all three case studies, the IECC-FIA examined the fiscal impact and energy cost savings of three incremental update cycles for Standard 90.1. The study refers to these incremental updates as “steps” and the three steps were as follows:

The Indiana Energy Conservation Code Fiscal Impact Assessment (IECC-FIA) was conducted as a “comparison” analysis and therefore only represents “comparison” values in lieu of absolute values.

•

Step 1: Current 2007 edition to 2010

•

Step 2: 2010 edition to 2013

•

Step 3: 2013 edition to 2016

The IECC-FIA consists of two separate components: •

Fiscal impact assessment

•

Energy cost savings assessment

The IECC-FIA averaged results across three incremental updates across the three representative case studies to ascertain an order-of-magnitude fiscal impact assessment with a sufficient degree of confidence from which the State of Indiana may consider new rules. (For reference, the fiscal impact assessment conducted in 2009 for the most recent update to Indiana’s energy code, which was obtained by public request, is included in the appendix of the full report of this study.)

The IECC-FIA examined three recently completed building projects that represent current standard practices for a higher education, commercial, and multifamily building project. Referencing the most recent available data, these three case studies constitute the majority of the types of buildings that file for plan review with the state. 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code In accordance with 675 IAC 19-4, Indiana’s current energy code is based on the 2007 edition of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings (commonly referred to as ASHRAE Standard 90.1) with state-developed/adopted amendments.

Using Three Representative Case Studies The IECC-FIA is based on data from the Plan Review Section of the Division of Fire and Building Safety of the Department of Homeland Security. The data are from all projected filed with Plan Review in the most recent calendar year for which such aggregated data is available. However, there is no reason or evidence to suggest that data from one calendar year is more or less valid than another year. In 2009, three volunteers provided fiscal impact analyses of sample construction projects. This served as a basis for why the IECC-FIA examined three case studies. The three case studies – a higher education facility, freestanding commercial office building, and a multi-story multifamily project – where strategically chosen to represent standard practices. Moreover, these categories of structures represent over half of the types of projects filed for Plan Review in the most recently available annual dataset from the state.

ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 Standard 90.1 provides the minimum requirements for energy-efficient design of most buildings, except lowrise residential buildings. It offers, in detail, the minimum energy-efficient requirements for design and construction of new buildings and their systems, new portions of buildings and their systems, and new systems and equipment in existing buildings, as well as criteria for determining compliance with these requirements. Standard 90.1 has been a benchmark for commercial building energy codes in the United States and a key basis for codes and standards around the world for more than 35 years. Standard 90.1 is a foundational reference document to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design

Indiana Requirements for Cost-Benefit Analysis The State of Indiana’s Financial Management Circular #2010-4, which addressed “Required Documents for

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 9

Budget Agency Approval” was issued on November 1, 2010 and refers to Indiana Code (IC) Title 4. State Office and Administration4 section IC 4-3-22-13, section IC 4-12-1-13, and Executive Order 2-89. Under the requirements for Cost-Benefit Analysis, the circular state:

greater than $500,000 on all regulated person (IC 4-22-2-28). The [State Budget Agency] shall describe here the data used and assumption made in making that determination.” The phrasing “total estimated impact” is the subject of debate. It is unclear whether the total impact is with regard to any given Class 1 structure (i.e., any structure that is used or occupied by the public, employees, or three or more tenants) or with regard to the aggregate impact for all filed Class 1 structures in any given year. The former interpretation has been assumed for the IECC-FIA. If the latter interpretation was assumed, the average fiscal impact per Class 1 structure filed in any given year would be negligible. For instance, if 9,000 projects were filed with the state in a year, the average fiscal impact per project would be $55.56.

Prior to State Budget Agency approval of a new rule under Executive Order 2-89, the agency proposing the adoption of a new rule or the adoption of an amendment to an existing rule must complete and submit to the Budget Agency a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed rule or amendment. All costbenefit analyses will be reviewed by the agency’s budget analyst and the Office of Management and Budget pursuant. To IC 43-22-13 and IC 4-22-2-28. For reference, the following are included in the appendix of the IECC-FIA: •

Executive Order 2-89

•

Financial Management Circular #2010-4

The scope of the IECC-FIA was designed to ascertain the fiscal impact on an individual project basis. Indiana Requirement: Regulatory Moratorium The IECC-FIA research team also wishes to acknowledge Executive Order 13-03, effective January 14, 2021, and Financial Management Circular #2015-1, effective December 18, 2015, which clarify the State of Indiana’s Regulatory Moratorium and procedure for requesting an exception to the Regulatory Moratorium at the time of the publication of this report.

The IECC-FIA does not independently constitute a complete Cost-Benefit Analysis in accordance with State of Indiana requirements, but it does align with the requirements insofar as its defined scope and may serve as a reference for a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Indiana Requirement: $500,000 Impact Financial Management Circular #2010-4 also defines a requisite maximum estimated economic impact of $500,000 as one of the requirements under “CostBenefit Analysis”:

For reference, the following are included in the appendix of the IECC-FIA:

d. In order to consider an update to any building code, the Indiana Code requires, “A determination as to whether the proposed rule will have a total estimated impact

•

Executive Order 13-03

•

Financial Management Circular #2015-1

Indiana Code, Title 4. State Offices and Administration. <http://iga.in.gov/legislative/laws/2020/ic/titles/004> last accessed 30 January 2021).

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 10

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Key Findings from the IECC-FIA The key findings of the IECC-FIA suggested the following:

Three Critical Economic Impacts The IECC-FIA determined the following potential economic impact for every incremental update to the state energy code:

Key Finding A. Nearly 60% of the United States has an energy code that is more current and stringent than the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code (which is based on ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 with amendment).

0.39% average building project cost increase. For every iterative update – or “step” – to the current 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code, project costs increased by an average of 0.39%.

Key Finding B. The fiscal impact on a building project averaged $133,304 per step. This is significantly below the State of Indiana’s fiscal impact limitation of $500,000.

5.9% average building project energy cost savings. The average energy cost savings for a codecompliant project increased an average of 5.9% with every code update.

Key Finding C. The average fiscal impact per incremental update to Indiana’s current energy code was $1.83 per square foot.

$64.2 million in annual state-wide energy Key Finding D. The average project cost increase from incrementally updating Indiana’s current energy code equated to 0.39%.

cost savings. For every iterative update to Indiana’s energy code, an average of $64.2 million dollars is saved every year in energy costs – based on current rates.

Key Finding E. Total energy consumption was reduced by an average of 5.9% per incremental update to Indiana’s current energy code. This equated to $0.12 per square foot per year based on current energy prices. Key Finding F. A single incremental update to Indiana’s current energy code would save the state over $64 million dollars per year in energy costs. Please see Explanation of Key Findings for more information on each key finding.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 11

METHODOLOGY Goals of the Assessment The goals of the Indiana Energy Conservation Code Fiscal Impact Assessment (IECC-FIA) were as follows: 1.

Assess built projects rather than theoretical models.

Evaluate the fiscal impact in accordance with Indiana statues.

Differentiate the impacts of a 1-step versus 3-step update to Indiana’s energy code.

Clarify the degree to which the “market standard” may currently be beyond the code.

Gauge potential benefits to the state’s economy.

For each of the three updates to the code considered in the fiscal impact assessment, the case studies were examined for the minimum changes to the building enclosure, lighting, and mechanical systems necessary to comply with the next three editions of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 (i.e., the 2010, 2013, and 2016 editions). The minimum required changes to the case studies were itemized and assigned anticipated project cost values. These costs incorporated labor, materials, and, when appropriate, design service fees. The costs associated with the itemized changes were developed in a collaborative effort of volunteers from Indiana’s architecture, engineering, and building construction professional body (please see Acknowledgements for a list of contributors). Energy cost savings assessment: Separate from the fiscal impact assessment of updating the Indiana Energy Conservation Code, the research team also conducted an energy costs savings assessment for updating the code. Similar to the fiscal impact assessment component, the energy cost savings assessment component considered three update “steps”: from the 2007 edition of Standard 90.1 to 2010; then 2010 to 2013; finally, 2013 to 2016. The research team examined the project design and construction documents as well as the filed energy code compliance reports for all three case studies and then conducted an independent building energy modeling exercise for each project.

Scope and Approach In order to achieve the research goals of the assessment, the IECC-FIA sought to examine the fiscal impact of updating the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code (2010 IECC) on three representative case studies in accordance with state regulations. Additionally, the case studies would be utilized to examine the potential realized energy cost savings for Indiana-based projects. Therefore, the IECC-FIA consists of two components: 1.

Fiscal impact assessment

Energy cost savings assessment

Acknowledgement of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Cost-Effectiveness Studies For every edition of ASHRAE Standard 90.1, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) assesses the energy cost savings associated with updated editions of the standard. The DOE conducts a thorough exercise using a validated methodology for both the national and custom state-level analysis.5 Although the DOE did not conduct a state-specific study for updating the 2007 edition of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 to the 2010 edition, the DOE did conduct such a study for updating the 2010 edition to 20136 and the 2013

Fiscal impact assessment: The fiscal impact assessment component is the primary component of the study. It examines the fiscal impact of updating the state’s energy code by adopting each of the next three updates of the energy standard that the state’s energy code is based on: the 2007 edition of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1 (commonly referred to as ASHRAE 90.1 or Standard 90.1). This exercise was applied to three recently constructed building projects in Indiana.

U.S. Department of Energy. Commercial Energy & Cost Savings Analysis. <https://www.energycodes.gov/commercial-energy-costsavings-analysis> (last accessed: January 29, 2021).

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Cost-Effectiveness of ASHARE Standard 90.1-2013 for the State of Indiana. December 2015. <https://www.energycodes.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ Cost-effectiveness_of_ASHRAE_Standard_90-1-2013Indiana.pdf> (last accessed 30 January 2021).

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 12

edition to 20167. Among other key findings, the studies determined the following:

with state-developed/adopted amendments. 675 IAC 19-4-2 through 19-4-11 define the amendments.9

Edition Cost Savings 2013 $0.144 / ft2 2016 $0.117 / ft2

About ASHRAE Standard 90.1 Standard 90.1 provides the minimum requirements for energy-efficient design of most buildings, except lowrise residential buildings. It offers, in detail, the minimum energy-efficient requirements for design and construction of new buildings and their systems, new portions of buildings and their systems, and new systems and equipment in existing buildings, as well as criteria for determining compliance with these requirements. Standard 90.1 has been a benchmark for commercial building energy codes in the United States and a key basis for codes and standards around the world for more than 35 years. Standard 90.1 is a foundational reference document to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system and numerous other green building certification frameworks. ASHRAE currently maintains a three-year update cycle for the standard. As such, the 2007 edition of the standard was updated by the 2010 edition, which was followed by the 2013 edition, etc.

Add Construction Cost $0.579 / ft2 $0.005 / ft2

The approach of energy costs savings assessment component of the IECC-FIA was not to duplicate, mimic, or reinforced the DOE work. Rather, the IECCFIA research team sough to expand upon the case study approach utilized for the fiscal impact assessment component in order to ascertain a more comprehensive examination of the economic consequence of updating Indiana’s energy code. Moreover, the energy costs savings were assessed for equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduced through the calculated energy savings based on Indiana’s utility grid mix. This was determined by applying the Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).8 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code Indiana Administrative Code (IAC), Article 19. Energy Conservation Codes, Rule 4. 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code states:

ASHRAE Standard 90.1 as the basis of the IECCFIA The IECC-FIA was developed under an assumption that ASHRAE Standard 90.1 will remain the basis of Indiana’s energy code for the foreseeable future. As such, the IECC-FIA examined the financial impact of updating the energy code via adoption of the next three editions of ASHRAE 90.1 – i.e., the 2010, 2013, and 2016 editions of the standard. The IECC-FIA assumes that future state-developed/adopted amendments will not substantively alter the requirements of the standard as it applies to the case studies examined.

Sec. 1. That certain document, being titled the Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, I-P Edition, ANSI/ASHRAE 90.1, 2007 Edition, published by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. 1791 Tullie Circle NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, is hereby adopted by reference as if fully set out in this rule save and except those revisions made in sections 2 through 11 of this rule. (Fire Prevention and Building Safety Commission; 675 IAC 19-4-1; filed Apr 6, 2010, 2:55 p.m.: 20100505-IR-675090388FRA; readopted filed Oct 31, 2017, 11:25 a.m.: 20171129-IR675160329RFA)

Tracking the Efficiency of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 Since 2002, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has contracted comparative analyses of the latest edition of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 versus the most recent previous edition of the standard regarding energy efficiency improvements.

675 IAC 19-4-1 effectively adopts the 2007 edition of ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings

U.S Environmental Protection Agency. Energy and the Environment: Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. <https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gasequivalencies-calculator> (last accessed 30 January 2021). 9 State of Indiana. Article 19: Energy Conservation Codes. 2010. <http://www.in.gov/legislative/iac/T06750/A00190.PDF> (last accessed 24 January 2021).

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Cost Effectiveness of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2016 for the State of Indiana. August 2020. <https://www.energycodes.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ 90.1-2016_State_Cost-Effectiveness_IN.pdf> (last accessed 30 January 2021).

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 13

Figure 1: Percent reduction of site and source energy of various editions of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 compared to the 1989 edition of the standard using data from the U.S. Department of Energy.

After completing a comparative analysis, the DOE will publish a "determination" memorandum in the Federal Register. The document provides public notice of the DOE's findings.

By aggregating the totality of the DOE determinations, the 2016 edition of Standard 90.1 results in 46.6% less source energy use and 43.6% less site energy use compared to the 1989 edition. (See Figure 1).

Determinations are publicly available on the DOE's website appear to go back as far as 2002, when the department published a comparative analysis of the 1999 edition to the 1989 edition.

Impact of Updating the Energy Code on State and Local Government The impact of on state and local government can be estimated only in very general terms, based on the data from all construction projects filed with the Plan Review Section of the Division of Fire and Building Safety of the Department of Homeland Security. Upon public request it became evident that aggregated records are not readily kept of building projects that file for Construction Design Release (CDR). The two most recent recovered annual records of aggregated filings were for 2008 and 2012. A summary of the architectural projects filed with the plan review section of the Division of Fire and Building Safety of the Indiana Department of Homeland Security in 2012 are summarized in Table 1. The aggregated data did not identify or otherwise breakout state and/or local government projects. However, in the preceding 2009 fiscal impact study, a rationale was offered that suggested that state government-related projects may constitute roughly 1.3% of projects filed annually and local government-related projects may constitute roughly 0.5% of projects filed annually.

Each subsequent DOE determination compares the current edition of Standard 90.1 to the most recent previous edition in terms of energy efficiency improvements related to both source energy and site energy. Though, it appears that the DOE has begun to assess relative energy cost savings, starting with the 2016 edition. The DOE also estimates energy use intensity (EUI) in their comparative analyses. The DOE determinations track incremental improvements from one edition of Standard 90.1 to the next. For instance, the DOE has determined that buildings built to Standard 90.1–2013, as compared with buildings built to Standard 90.1–2010, would result in national source energy savings of approximately 8.5 percent and site energy savings of approximately 7.6 percent of commercial building energy consumption.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 14

Code A B E F H I M R S U TOTAL

Case Study 2: Business – Commercial Office The second case study was a two-story 14,023square foot commercial office development with food services on the ground floor. The project costs totaled $5,876,563 (2020 USD). The project was filed with the state in 2017.

Project Count 1,233 2,056 207 439 25 212 903 3,119 949 68 9,211

Case Study 3 The third case study was a four-story 183,970-square foot multifamily development. The project consisted of one structure with 188 residential units and various amenity spaces. The project costs were estimated to be $34,034,450 (2020 USD). The project was filed in 2019.

Note: This data is for new construction projects. Remodeling projects were excluded.

Evaluation of Cost and Benefit In the absence of a fiscal impact analysis for each occupancy classification represented by the annual CDR filings, it is not possible to further evaluate the fiscal impact of the proposed rule as it pertains to specific occupancy types. However, the preceding 2009 fiscal impact study only assess one project. This fiscal impact study builds off of that precedent by offering three case studies representative of the occupancy types (i.e., B and R) that constitute 56% of the total filings in the aggregated CRR data identified above. The evaluation of cost and benefit is averaged across three updates to ASHRAE Standard 90.1 (i.e., the 2010, 2013, and 2016 editions) across the three case studies assessed for this study. The averaged data across three update cycles and three projects offers a limited but nevertheless substantiated fiscal impact assessment with regard to updating the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code.

Table 1: Architectural projects filed with the plan review section of the Division of Fire and Building Safety of the Indiana Department of Homeland Security in 2012. According to the most recently recovered aggregated CDR data, the largest percentage of new construction projects was for “B” – business – occupancies, which includes a wide range of projects types including private commercial development as well as higher education projects for state-funded institutions. As such, these two project types were considered for study in this fiscal impact assessment. The second largest percentage of new construction projects was for “R” – residential – occupancies. However, 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code does not apply to one- and two-family dwellings. Therefore, the R projects filed would consist largely of multifamily development. As such, a large multifamily project was considered for study in this fiscal impact assessment.

Assumptions and Clarifications Please note the following assumptions and clarifications regarding the scope of the study and the format of this report.

The IECC-FIA Case Studies The research team examined three built projects for the fiscal impact assessment. As such, actual construction costs could be examined for each project. Case Study 1: Business – Higher Education The first case was a four-level 107,655-square foot facility for a state-funded institution for higher education. The project costs totaled $42,822,786 (2020 USD). The project was filed with the state in 2016.

The project costs for all three case studies were adjusted to 2020 dollars.

Energy costs fluctuate. However, for the purposes of the energy cost savings analysis, a constant energy costs of $0.12 per kilowatt-hour was assumed.

Project identifiers were intentionally withheld from this summary at the request of the collaborators for the IECC-FIA.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 15

EXPLANATION OF KEY FINDINGS A. Nearly 60% of the United States has an energy code that is more current and stringent than the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code (which is based on ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007 with amendment). (Figure 2)

Please note that this information is accurate as of December 31, 2020 and is subject to change. In some states, local municipalities are permitted to adopt energy codes – even if one does not exist at the state level.

In the U.S., each state determines its own building codes. Additionally, the District of Columbia determines its own building codes. Collectively, the U.S. exhibits 51 jurisdictions of building codes. Of the 51 jurisdictions: •

29 jurisdictions have energy codes that are more stringent than Indiana’s current energy code.

•

14 jurisdictions have energy codes that are generally equivalent to Indiana’s current energy code.

•

8 jurisdictions do not have mandatory statelevel energy codes.

Figure 2: Nearly 60% of the state-level jurisdictions in the U.S. have energy codes that are more current and stringent than the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code (which is based on ASHRAE Standard 90.1 with amendments). The information presented here uses data from the U.S. Department of Energy as of December 31, 2020.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 16

B. The fiscal impact on a building project averaged $133,304 per step. This is significantly below the State of Indiana’s fiscal impact limitation of $500,000. (Figure 3)

The average project cost increase per incremental update (i.e., “step”) to Indiana’s energy code was $133,304. The average project cost increase has been broken out categorically in Table 2. Whether by case study or by their combined average, the fiscal impact is significantly below the state’s regulatory limit of $500,000 per project.

The final project cost for all three case studies were equated to 2020 USD for an apt comparison. The Business – Higher Education (BH) project had a total project cost of $42,822,786. The average project cost impact after three iterations of energy code updates (i.e., Standard 90.1-2007 to 2010; 2010 to 2013; and 2013 to 2016) was $261,213.

Please see Appendix F for more information about the State of Indiana’s regulatory requirements for rule changes.

The Business – Commercial (BC) project had a total project cost of $5,876,563. The average project cost impact after the same three iterations of energy code updates was $26,883. The Residential – Multifamily (RM) project had a total project cost of $34,034,450. Unlike the business case studies in which the general contractor’s project costs were used, for this example multiple development entities in Indianapolis were consulted in order to arrive at reasonable project cost parameters. The average project cost impact after the same three iterations of energy code updates was $111,815.

Figure 3: Graphic summary of the fiscal impact of incrementally updating Indiana’s current energy code on all three case studies.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 17

Category

System

Cost

Above Grade Wall Construction

$118,229

Below Grade Wall Construction

$49,067

Roof Construction

$71,873

Air Distribution

$38,667

Space Heating and Cooling

$14,300

Electrical Power

$43,850

Lighting

$28,200

Lighting Control

$31,560

Service / Other

$4,167

Cost Impact

$133,304

Percent Cost Impact

0.39%

Total Cost Impact per Square Foot

$1.83

Table 2: Breakout of the average fiscal impact per incremental update to Indiana’s current energy code across all three case studies.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 18

C. The average fiscal impact per incremental update to Indiana’s current energy code was $1.83 per square foot. (Figure 4) Additionally, it was determined that if Indiana’s energy code was updated by three increments (e.g., the 2007 edition of ASHRAE 90.1 to the 2016 edition), the average fiscal impact per incremental update diminished. Stated differently, although the average fiscal impact per incremental update – or “step” – was $1.83 per square foot, a three-step update was not $5.49 (or $1.83 x 3) per square foot but rather $3.84 per square foot. On an individual case study basis, the Business – Higher Education (BH) project exhibited a one-step average project cost increase of $2.74 and a threestep average increase of $5.26. The Business – Commercial (BC) project exhibited a one-step average project cost increase of $2.02 and a three-step average increase of $4.83. The Residential – Multifamily (RM) project exhibited a one-step average project cost increase of $0.74 and a three-step average increase of $1.43.

Figure 4: Graphic summary of the average fiscal impact on project costs on the basis of unit area. The data exhibits the average one-increment (or “1-step”) and three-increment (or “3-step”) energy code update impact.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 19

D. The average project cost increase from incrementally updating Indiana’s current energy code equated to 0.39%. (Figure 5) Additionally, it was determined that if Indiana’s energy code was updated by three increments (e.g., the 2007 edition of ASHRAE 90.1 to the 2016 edition), the average fiscal impact per incremental update diminished. Stated differently, although the average project cost increase per incremental update – or “step” – was 0.39%, a three-step update was not 1.17% (or 0.39% x 3) but rather 0.89%. On an individual case study basis, the Business – Higher Education (BH) project exhibited a one-step average project cost increase of 0.51% and a threestep average increase of 1.09%. The Business – Commercial (BC) project exhibited a one-step average project cost increase of 0.36% and a three-step average increase of 0.89%. The Residential – Multifamily (RM) project exhibited a one-step average project cost increase of 0.30% and a three-step average increase of 0.68%.

Figure 5: Graphic summary of the average fiscal impact on project costs on a percentage basis. The data exhibits the average one-increment (or “1-step”) and three-increment (or “3-step”) energy code update impact.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 20

E. Total energy consumption was reduced by an average of 5.9% per incremental update to Indiana’s current energy code. This equated to $0.12 per square foot per year based on current energy prices. (Figure 6)

The Business – Commercial (BC) project exhibited a one-step average energy cost savings of $0.16 per square foot and a three-step average savings of $0.47 per square foot. The Residential – Multifamily (RM) project exhibited a one-step average energy cost savings of $0.08 per square foot and a three-step average savings of $0.23 per square foot.

The research team conducted an independent energy use analysis for all three case studies in order to support a cost-benefit analysis of updating the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code. Cost information was based on the average retail costs of energy as of December 17, 2020. It was determined that if Indiana’s energy code was updated by one increment (e.g., the 2007 edition of ASHRAE 90.1 to the 2010 edition), the average energy cost savings would be $0.12 per square foot. Additionally, if the energy code was updated by three increments (e.g., the 2007 edition of ASHRAE 90.1 to the 2016 edition), the average energy cost savings would be $0.31 per square foot. On an individual case study basis, the Business – Higher Education (BH) project exhibited a one-step average energy cost savings of $0.12 per square foot and a three-step average savings of $0.35 per square foot.

Figure 6: Graphic summary of the energy cost savings determined for the three case studies based on current energy prices. The average reduction in total energy consumption was determined to be 5.9% per incremental update in Indiana’s current energy code.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 21

F. A single incremental update to Indiana’s current energy code would save the state over $64 million dollars per year in energy costs. (Figure 7) A regular update cycle to the energy code would yield exponentially more energy cost savings. Based on the state’s current energy resource mix, a single incremental update to the current energy code would spare the equivalent of 834.5 million pounds of carbon dioxide emissions.

Consistent number of Plan Review filings per year based on the annual figures used for the IECC-FIA.

An average gross project area of 50,000 square feet per Plan Review filing.

Carbon emissions as determined by the U.S. EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator.

In light of these assumption, it the expressed intention of the research team that these multi-year state-level figures are considered preliminary, broad, and conceptual in order to articulate the impact at-scale across the state for updating the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Code with regularity.

If the State of Indiana committed to a regular threeyear incremental update cycle, it would yield approximately $1.4 billion in cumulative energy cost savings and a total reduction of approximately 18.4 billion pounds of equivalent carbon dioxide emissions. These figures are obviously high-level projects and meant only to articulate an order-of-magnitude. These figures were arrived to through an analysis that included the following assumptions: 1.

Consistent energy costs based on prices as of December 17, 2020.

Figure 7: Graphic summary of the potential state-wide impact of incrementally updating Indiana’s current energy code.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 22

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 23

REFERENCES American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2007: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: ASHRAE, 2007. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: ASHRAE, 2010. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: ASHRAE, 2013. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2016: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: ASHRAE, 2016. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Cost-Effectiveness of ASHARE Standard 90.1-2013 for the State of Indiana. December 2015. <https://www.energycodes.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Costeffectiveness_of_ASHRAE_Standard_90-1-2013-Indiana.pdf> (last accessed 30 January 2021). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Cost Effectiveness of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2016 for the State of Indiana. August 2020. <https://www.energycodes.gov/sites/default/files/documents/90.1-2016_State_CostEffectiveness_IN.pdf> (last accessed 30 January 2021). State of Indiana. Article 19: Energy Conservation Codes. 2010. <http://www.in.gov/legislative/iac/T06750/A00190.PDF> (last accessed 24 January 2021). U.S. Department of Energy. Commercial Energy & Cost Savings Analysis. <https://www.energycodes.gov/commercial-energy-cost-savings-analysis> (last accessed 30 January). U.S Environmental Protection Agency. Energy and the Environment: Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. <https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator> (last accessed 30 January 2021). Note: In addition to the listed references below, multiple public record references have been included in the appendix of this summary.

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 24

APPENDIX APPENDIX A: ASHRAE STANDARD 90.1 COMPARISON: 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 APPENDIX B: CASE STUDY B-H BUSINESS – HIGHER EDUCATION APPENDIX C: CASE STUDY B-C BUSINESS – COMMERCIAL APPENDIX D: CASE STUDY R-M RESIDENTIAL – MULTIFAMILY APPENDIX E: 2010 INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDIX F: HISTORIC STATE REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 25

APPENDIX A: ASHRAE STANDARD 90.1 COMPARISION: 2007, 2010, 2013 AND 2016 The following tables compare the critical changes in successive editions of ASHRAE Standard 90.1 as follows: a. b. c.

2007 edition vs 2010 edition. 2010 edition vs 2013 edition. 2013 edition vs 2016 edition.

Climate Zone

ASHRAE 90.1-2007

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

---

Section 3 includes addtional definitons: daylight area, ulti-level occupancy sensor, critical circuit, dynamic glazing, thermally effective panel surface, field-fabricated fenestration, skylight effective aperture

ASHRAE 90.1-2007

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

Component

Section 3: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

System

---

Climate Zone

5A System

Component

5.4.3.1. The entire building envelope shall be designed and constructed with a continuous air barrier with the exception for semi-heated spaces.

Air Barrier Mandatory Provision

5.4.3.1. The following areas of the building shall be sealed, caulked, gasketed to minimize air leakage: joints, junctions, openings in penetration, building assemblies used as ducts or plenums, site-bilt fenestrations and doors Air leakage: Glazing swinging and revolving doors - max 1 cfm/ft2 non-swinging doors - 0.4 cfm/ft2

Air barrier materials shall have an air permeanance not exceeding 0.004 cfm/sq ft under a pressure differential of 0.3 in wg Sealants, tapes, other assemblies of materials - 0.04 cfm/ft2 Curtainwall and storefront glazing - 0.06 cfm/sf Glazing swinging and revolving doors - 1 cfm/ft2 non-swinging doors - 0.4 cfm/ft2

Section 5: Building Envelope

Prescriptive Option - Roofs

Prescriptive Option - Walls

Prescriptive Option - Floors

Prescriptive Option - Glazing

Climate Zone

5A System

Non-Residential/Residential: Insulation Entirely Above Deck Assembly U-Value - 0.048, R-20 ci Attic or other roof: R-38 insulation , U-0.027 Metal Building: R-19, U-0.065 Reflectivity - 0.3 per Table G3.1, page 176, right column, item e.

Non-Residential/Residential: Insulation Entirely Above Deck Assembly U-Value - 0.048, R-20 ci Attic or other roof: R-38 insulation , U-0.027 Metal Building: R-19, U0.065

Non-Residential: Non-Residential: Steel-Framed Above Grade Wall, Assembly U-Value - 0.064 (R-13 + R-7.5 ci) Mass Wall Assembly U-value Steel-Framed Above Grade Wall, Assembly U-Value - 0.064 (R-13 + R-7.5 ci) Mass Wall Assembly U-value -0.09 (R-11.4 ci) -0.09 (R-11.4 ci) Metal Building U-value 0.113 (R-13) Metal Building U-value 0.069 (R-13+R-5.6 ci) Wood-Framed U-value 0.064 (R-13 +R-3.8 ci) Wood-Framed U-value 0.064 (R-13 +R-3.8 ci) Residential: Mass Wall Assembly U-value -0.080 (R-13.3 ci) Air leakage requirement - N/A

Residential: Mass Wall Assembly U-value -0.080 (R-13.3 ci) Air leakage requirement - N/A

Non-Residential: Slab-On-Grade: F-Value - 0.73, No Insulation Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.074, R-10.4 ci

Residential: Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.064, R-12.5 ci Slab-On-Grade Unheated: F-Value - 0.54, R-10 for 24"

All Areas 0-40% of Wall Area, all exposures. Curtainwall System: Assembly U-Value - 0.45, SHGC - 0.40; Window U-value -0.55, SHGC - 0.4 Glass Door U-value - 0.8 SHGC - 0.40; Swinging Door U-value - 0.7

ASHRAE 90.1-2007

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

Component Gas/Hybrid: Gas/Hybrid: System 1: Packaged PTAC with HW fossil boilers (Residential)

Baseline HVAC System Type(s)

System 3: Packaged DX AC with gas-fired heat exchangers (Non-Residential and 3 floors or less and <25,000 ft2) System 5: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW fossil boilers (Nonresidential and 4 or 5 floors and < 25,000 ft2 or 5 floors or less and 25,000 to 150,000 ft2) System 7: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW Fossil Boilers (Nonresidential and more than 5 floors or > 150,000 ft2)

Energy Recovery Section 6.5.6 Prescriptive Option

Required if system has more than 5,000 cfm and minimum OA of 70% or greater. 50% efficiency. Exception: systems that are not cooled and are heated to less than 60F Lab systems, cooling systems in zones 3c, 4c,5b,5c,6b,7,8. etc

System 1 Packaged PTAC with HW fossil boilers (Residential) System 3 Packaged DX AC with gas-fired heat exchangers (Non-Residential and 3 floors or less and <25,000 ft2) System 5: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW fossil boilers (Nonresidential and 4 or 5 floors and < 25,000 ft2 or 5 floors or less and 25,000 to 150,000 ft2) System 7: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW fossil boilers (Nonresidential and more than 5 floors or > 150,000 ft2) System 9*new: Heating & Ventilation; warm air furnace, gas fired; no cooling; with fossil fuel (Heated Only Storage)

Required for systems that exceeds values of Table 6.5.6.1 50% efficiency. Exception: systems that are not cooled and are heated to less than 60F; Lab systems meeting 6.5.7.2; Cooling systems in zones 3c, 4c,5b,5c,6b,7,8. etc

Fan Power Prescriptive Option

CV System: HP ≤ CFM * 0.0011 BHP ≤ CFM*0.00094+ A VAV System: HP ≤ CFM * 0.0015 BHP ≤ CFM*0.0013+ A A = SUM (PD*CFM/4131) , PD from Table 6.5.3.1.1B 1. Fan with motors 10 hp or larger shall have variable speed drive. 2. Motors efficiency must comply with EPAct 1992 as shown in Table 10.8

Cooling Efficiency Mandatory Provisions

Air Conditioners, Air cooled: < 65 Mbh -13 SEER ≥ 65 Mbh - <135 Mbh - 11 EER ≥ 135 Mbh - < 240 Mbh - 10.8 EER ≥ 240 Mbh - < 760 Mbh - 9.8 EER ≥ 760 Mbh - 9.5 EER

CV System HP ≤ CFM * 0.0011 BHP ≤ CFM*0.00094+ A VAV System: HP ≤ CFM * 0.0015 BHP ≤ CFM*0.0013+ A A = SUM (PD*CFM/4131) , PD from Table 6.5.3.1.1B 1. Fan with motors 10 hp or larger shall have variable speed drive. 2. Motors efficiency must comply with EPAct 1992 as shown in Table 10.8A before December 19, 2010 Motors efficiency must comply with EIA 2007 as shown in Table 10.8-1b after December 19, 2010 3. Multiple-zone VAV System Ventilation Optimization Control

Air Conditioners, Air cooled: < 65 Mbh -13 SEER ≥ 65 Mbh - <135 Mbh -11 EER/ 11.2 IEER ≥ 135 Mbh - < 240 Mbh - 10.8 EER/11.0 IEER ≥ 240 Mbh - < 760 Mbh -9.8 EER/9.9 IEER ≥ 760 Mbh - 9.5 EER/ 9.6 IEER

Section 6: Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning

Computer and VRF Air-to-Air unit efficiencies based on equipment size

Controls Prescriptive Option

Thermal Comfort Mandatory Provisions Heating Efficiency Mandatory Provisions

Pipe Insulation Table 6.8.3

Elevators, Kitchens Equipment, Miscellaneous Load

Climate Zone

5A System

Component

1. Economizer is required for units ≥ 54,000 Btuh, for computer rooms: ≥ 135,000 Btuh Not required for residential spaces with system capacity ≤ 10,800 Btuh 2. CV Systems ≥ 15,000 btuh shall have a temperature setback to 55F and 90F during unoccupied hours except spaces with continuous operation (Mandatory) 3. Optimum start controls for systems with greater than 10,000 cfm or Individual heating and cooling systems with setback controls and DDC (Mandatory) 4. All outdoor air intake and exhaust systems shall be equipped with Motorized Damper (Mandatory) 1. Economizer is required for units ≥ 135,000 Btuh 5. Motorized damper air leakage 4 cfm/ft2 (Mandatory) Not required for residential spaces with system capacity ≤ 27,000 Btuh 6. Enclosed Parking Garage Ventilation systems shall detect contaminant level and to reduce air to 50% Integrated economizer is required for systems ≥65,000 Btuh and 2 two stages of cooling in climate zone or less of design 3b, 4b capacity. Exception: garage less 30,000 ft2 without cooling or heating (Mandatory) 2. CV Systems ≥ 15,000 btuh shall have a temperature setback to 55F and 90F during unoccupied hours 7. DCV for spaces with > 500ft2, < 25 ft2/person and systems with OA > 3000 cfm or an air-side except spaces with continuous operation (Mandatory) economizer.(Exception: 3. Optimum start controls for systems with greater than 10,000 cfm (Mandatory) Section 6.4.3.9) 4. Exhaust fan with greater than 300 cfm, not for continuous exhaust shall have gravity or motorized 8. Single Zone VAV Controls in compliance with section 6.4.3.10 (Mandatory) damper (Mandatory) 9. Sensible Heating panel & Radiant bottom floor Heating Insulation - R-3.5 (Mandatory) 5. Motorized damper air leakage 10 cfm/ft2 (Mandatory) 10. Where rehearing is permitted, zones that have both supply and return/exhaust opening shall not 6. DCV for spaces with > 500ft2, ≤ 25 ft2/person and systems with OA > 3000 cfm or an air-side supply heating air economizer (Exception: Section 6.4.3.9) more than 20F above the space temperature setpoint 7. MERV 13 Filter for ventilation systems (LEED 2009) 11. VAV systems with DDC shall include means to reduce OA below design rates to change system ventilation efficiency as defined by App A of ASHRAE 62.1. Exception: system with ERW 12. Multiple zone HVAC Systems must include controls to reset the SA temperature at least 25% of the difference between the SA temperature and the design room air temperature. 13 Pipe sizing limitations based on gpm. Table 6.5.4.5 14. Limitation on Centrifugal Fan Open Circuit cooling towers listed in Table 6.8.1G 15. MERV 13 Filter for ventilation systems, in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-2007 (LEED V4) Office, Lobbies, Residential spaces : 75F/50% , Winter- 70F/35% Office, Lobbies, Residential spaces : 75F/50% , Winter- 70F/35% Kitchen: 70F/50%, and Winter -68F Kitchen: 70F/50%, and Winter -68F Fitness Room: 68-75F/50%, and Winter -68F Fitness Room: 68-75F/50%, and Winter -68F Stairwells - summer ambient, winter -55F Stairwells - summer ambient, winter -55F Utility Rooms - summer 89F, winter -55F Utility Rooms - summer 89F, winter -55F Vestibule - 60F Vestibule - 60F Gas Fired Furnace -80% Efficiency Gas Fired Furnace -80% Efficiency Gas-Fired Boilers: < 300 Mbh -80% Efficiency Gas-Fired Boilers: < 300 Mbh -80% Efficiency ≥ 300 Mbh - < 2,500 Mbh - 80% Efficiency ≥ 300 Mbh - < 2,500 Mbh - 80% Efficiency >2,500 Mbh 82% Efficiency >2,500 Mbh 82% Efficiency Electric Furnace with ≥ 225 mbh - 0.75% losses Electric Furnace with ≥ 225 mbh - 0.75% losses Insulation for 141-200F Temperature Range: Insulation for 141-200F Temperature Range: <1" pipe/tube size -1" insulation <1" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation 1 to <1 1/2" pipe/tube size -1" insulation 1 to <1 1/2" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation 1 1/2" to <4" pipe/tube size - 1" insulation 1 1/2" to <4" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation 4" to <8" pipe/tube size - 1.5" insulation 4" to <8" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation

Section 6.5.7 : Kitchen exhaust hoods ≥ 5,000 cfm shall be provided with makeup air sized at least for 50% of EA that is unheated or heated to 60F Fume hood with ≥ 15,000 cfm shall include VAV exhaust to reduce air volume by 50% , etc

1. Section 6.5.7 : Make-up air introduced into hood cavity of Kitchen exhaust hoods shall not exceed 10% of the EA airflow rate. Conditioned SA delivered to any space with a kitchen hood shall not exceed the supply flow required to meet the space heating/cooling or the available transfer air from adjacent spaces. If kitchen exhaust hoods ≥ 5,000 cfm , each hood shall have an exhaust rate that complies with Table 6.5.7.1.3 and it shall have one of the following: a) at least 50% of all replacement air is transfer air that would otherwise be exhausted b) DCV on at least 75% of EA c) ERW on at least 50% of the EA. Lab exhaust systems ≥ 5,000 cfm shall include VAV exhaust or direct MA supply equal to 75% of the EA rate heated no warmer than 2F below room setpoint, cooled to no colder than 3F above room setpoint. 2. Elevator systems shall comply with section 10.4.3.(Lighting efficacy not less than 35 lumens/watt, cab ventilators - max 0.33 W/cfm at max speed) 3. Pool Heaters (Mandatory): heaters must be equipped with a readily accessible ON/OFF switch. Time switches must be installed on pool heaters/pumps except those that require 24/7 operation

ASHRAE 90.1-2007

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

Section 7: Service Water Heating Climate Zone 5A System

Hot Water

Plumbing fixtures: Lavatory - 0.5 gpm Residential Lavatory -2.2 gpm Water Closets - 1.6 gpf Urinal -1.0 gpf Bath tub - 2.5 gpm Kitchen Sink - 2.2 gpm Pre-rinse valve -1.6 gpm Dishwasher undercounter -1.6 gal/rack, single tank conveyor - 1 gal/rack 1. Heat Recovery systems shall be installed for heating/preheating of hot water if the facility operates 24 hrs/day, the total installed heat rejection capacity of the water cooled systems exceeds 6,000 MBH of heat rejection and design service water heating load exceeds 1,000 MBH. Table 7.8 in 90.1-2007 on page 57: Electric water heaters ≤ 12 kW Performance: 0.93-0.00132V EF >12 KW Performance: 20+35 √V SL, Btuh Gas instant. water heaters: < 200 Mbh Performance: 0.62-0.0019V EF > 200 Mbh Performance: 80% or 80%( Q/800+110√V SL, Btuh)

Plumbing fixtures: Lavatory - 0.5 gpm (0.4 gpm -Prescriptive Compliance) Residential Lavatory -2.2 gpm (1.5 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Water Closets - 1.6 gpf (1.28 gpf -Prescriptive Compliance) Urinal -1.0 gpf (0.5 gpf -Prescriptive Compliance) Showerhead - 2.5 gpm (2.0 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Kitchen Sink - 2.2 gpm (1.75 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Pre-rinse valve -1.3 gpm Dishwasher undercounter -1.6 gal/rack, single tank conveyor - 1 gal/rack 1. WH-1,2 Standby Loss: 20+35 √50 = 267.5 Btuh, SL Heat Recovery systems shall be installed for heating/preheating of hot water if the facility operates 24 hrs/day, the total installed heat rejection capacity of the water cooled systems exceeds 6,000 MBH of heat rejection and design service water heating load exceeds 1,000 MBH. 2. New Buildings with gas service HW Systems of 1,000 MBh or greater shall have min thermal efficiency of 90% except water heaters installed in individual dwelling units. 3. Fire pump motors and NEMA Design B, general purpose electric motors with a power rating of more than 200 hp, but not more than 500 hp must have minimum full load efficiency that is not less than as shown in Table 10.8C 4. Service Water Pressure Booster System must be designed with the section 10.4.2 Table 7.8 in 90.1-2007 on page 57: Electric water heaters ≤ 12 kW Performance: 0.97-0.00132V EF >12 KW Performance: 20+35 √V SL, Btuh Gas instant. water heaters: < 200 Mbh Performance: 0.62-0.0019V EF > 200 Mbh Performance: 80% or 80% (Q/800+110√V) SL, Btuh

ASHRAE 90.1-2007

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

Interior Lighting: Office - 1.1 W/sqft Lobby/Waiting - 1.3 W/sqft Corridors - 0.5 W/sqft Kitchen - 1.2 W/sqft Breakroom - 0.9 W/sqft Conference - 1.3 W/sqft Active Storage - 0.8 W/sqft Electrical / Mechanical - 1.5 W/sqft Restrooms - 0.9 W/sqft Data / Communication = 1.5 W/sqft Dining Area = 0.9 W/sqft Laundry = 0.6 W/sqft Apartments/Hotel Rooms = 1.1 W/sqft Exercise Area = 0.9 W/sqft Retail -1.7 W/sqft Stairway -0.69 W/SF

Interior Lighting: Office - 0.98-1.11 W/sqft Lobby/Waiting - 0.64-0.90 W/sqft Corridors - 0.66 W/sqft Kitchen/Breakroom - 0.99 W/sqft Conference - 1.23 W/sqft Training - 1.24 W/sqft Storage - 0.63 W/sqft Electrical / Mechanical - 0.95 W/sqft Restrooms - 0.98 W/sqft Data / Communication = 0.95 W/sqft Dining Area = 0.9 W/sqft Laundry = 0.6 W/sqft Apartments/Hotel Rooms = 1.11 W/sqft Exercise Area = 0.72 W/sqft Retail -1.1 W/sqft Stairway -0.69 W/SF

1. Occupancy sensor or time switch that turns lighting off within 30 minutes after the last occupant in conference/meeting and break/lunch rooms, classrooms 2. Automatic shut off of Lighting is required in buildings > 5,000 SF 3. Enclosed spaces must have manual or automatic control for general lighting

Component

Electrical Systems

Lighting Power Density (using space-by-space method) Prescriptive Option (All Controls are Mandatory Requirements)

ASHRAE 90.1 Standard does not apply to lighting within dwelling units or any emergency lighting

Power Section 8 Mandatory Provisions

1. Feeder Conductors shall be sized for a max. voltage drop of 2% at design load 2. Branch Circuits shall be sized for a max. voltage drop of 3% at design load

Site Exterior Lighting (All Controls are Mandatory Requirements)

Parking Lots and Drives - 0.15 W/SF Walkways <10 ft -1W/lin ft Walkways ≥ 10 ft - 0.2 W/SF Main Entry - 30W/lin ft Other Doors - 20W/lin ft Canopies/Overhangs -1.25 W/ft2 Building facade -0.2 W/ft2 1. Lighting must be OFF during the day (when daylight available)

Requirements based on the lighting zone 0,1,2,3 or 4. more stringent and detailed than ASHRAE 90.1-2007. Parking Lots and Drives - 0.04-13 W/SF Walkways <10 ft -0.7-1 W/lin ft Walkways ≥ 10 ft - 0.14-0.2 W/SF Main Entry - 20-30 W/lin ft Other Doors - 20 W/lin ft Canopies/Overhangs -0.6-1.0 W/ft2 Building façade -0.1-0.2 W/ft2 1. Lighting must be OFF during the day by photosensor 2. Lighting is regulated during the night so it is either OFF or operating at a reduced level depending on the purpose of the lighting

Climate Zone

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Section 3 includes addtional definitons: metal-coiling door, lamp efficacy, IT equipment energy , power usage effectivness (PUE), PRV

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Component

Section 3: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

System

---

Climate Zone

5A System

Component

5.4.3.1. The entire building envelope shall be designed and constructed with a continuous air barrier with the exception for semi-heated spaces.

Air Barrier Mandatory Provision

Air barrier materials shall have an air permeanance not exceeding 0.004 cfm/sq ft under a pressure differential of 0.3 in wg Sealants, tapes, other assemblies of materials - 0.04 cfm/ft2

Same as ASHRAE 90.1-2010

Curtainwall and storefront glazing - 0.06 cfm/sf Glazing swinging and revolving doors - 1 cfm/ft2 non-swinging doors - 0.4 cfm/ft2

Section 5: Building Envelope

Prescriptive Option - Roofs

Prescriptive Option - Walls

Prescriptive Option - Floors

Non-Residential/Residential: Insulation Entirely Above Deck Assembly U-Value - 0.048, R-20 ci Attic or other roof: R-38 insulation , U-0.027 Metal Building: R-19, U0.065

Non-Residential/Residential: Insulation Entirely Above Deck Assembly U-Value - 0.032, R-30 ci Attic or other roof: R-49 insulation, U-0.021 Metal Building: R-10 + R11 Ls , U-0.037 Reflectivity - 0.3 per Table G3.1. Requires roof solar reflectance and thermal emittance testing to be in accordance with CRRC-1 Standard (5.5.3.1)

Non-Residential: Steel-Framed Above Grade Wall, Assembly U-Value - 0.064 (R-13 + R-7.5 ci) Mass Wall Assembly U-value -0.09 (R-11.4 ci) Metal Building U-value 0.069 (R-13+R-5.6 ci) Wood-Framed U-value 0.064 (R-13 +R-3.8 ci)

Non-Residential: Steel-Framed Above Grade Wall, max U-0.055 (R-13 + R-10 ci) Mass Wall max U-0.090 (R-11.4 ci) Metal Building max U-0.050 (R-19 ci) Wood-Framed max U-0.051 (R-13 +R-7.5 ci)

Residential: Mass Wall Assembly U-value -0.080 (R-13.3 ci) Air leakage requirement - N/A

Residential: Mass Wall Assembly U-value -0.080 (R-13.3 ci) Air leakage requirement - not exceed 0.4cfm/SF of wall.

Non-Residential: Slab-On-Grade: F-Value - 0.73, No Insulation Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.074, R-10.4 ci Residential: Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.064, R-12.5 ci Slab-On-Grade Unheated: F-Value - 0.54, R-10 for 24"

Non-Residential: Slab-On-Grade Unheated: F-Value - 0.52, R-15 for 24" Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.057, R-14.6 ci Residential: Slab-On-Grade Unheated: F-Value - 0.51, R-20 for 24" Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.051, R-16.7 ci All Areas 0-40% of Wall Area, all exposures. Curtainwall System: Assembly: U-0.42, SHGC-0.40; VT/SHGC-1.10

Prescriptive Option - Glazing

Operable: Assembly: U-0.50, SHGC-0.40; VT/SHGC-1.1 0 Window, Fixed, Assembly: U-0.42, SHGC-0.4, VT/SHGC-1.10 Glass Door: U-0.77 SHGC-0.40; VT/SHGC-1.10 Swinging Door: U-0.5 Low-e requirements for storm window retrofits

Climate Zone ASHRAE 90.1-2010

5A System

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Component Climate Zone 4-8*revised: Gas/Hybrid: System 1 Packaged PTAC with HW fossil boilers (Residential) System 3 Packaged DX AC with gas-fired heat exchangers (Non-Residential and 3 floors or less and <25,000 ft2) Baseline HVAC System Type(s)

System 5: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW fossil boilers (Nonresidential and 4 or 5 floors and < 25,000 ft2 or 5 floors or less and 25,000 to 150,000 ft2) System 7: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW fossil boilers (Nonresidential and more than 5 floors or > 150,000 ft2) System 9*new: Heating & Ventilation; warm air furnace, gas fired; no cooling; with fossil fuel (Heated Only Storage)

Energy Recovery Section 6.5.6 Prescriptive Option

System 1: Packaged PTAC with HW fossil boilers (Residential) System 3*revised: Packaged DX AC with gas-fired heat exchangers (Public Assembly <120,000 ft2, Retail and 2 floors or less, Non-Residential and 3 floors or less and <25,000 ft2) System 5: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW fossil boilers (Nonresidential and 4 or 5 floors and < 25,000 ft2 or 5 floors or less and 25,000 to 150,000 ft2) System 7: Packaged VAV with Reheat with HW fossil boilers (Nonresidential and more than 5 floors or > 150,000 ft2) System 9: Heating & Ventilation; warm air furance, gas fired; no cooling; with fossil fuel furnace (Heated Only Storage) System 12*new: Single-zone constant volume; chilled water, HW fossil fuel boiler (Public Assembly)

Required for systems that exceeds values of Table 6.5.6.1-1 or 6.5.6.1-2 (more stringent that 90.1-2010) 50% efficiency. Exception: systems that are not cooled and are heated to less than 60F; Lab systems meeting 6.5.7.2; Cooling systems in zones 3c, 4c,5b,5c,6b,7,8. etc

Fan Power Prescriptive Option

Cooling Efficiency Mandatory Provisions

Section 6: Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning

Computer and VRF Air-to-Air unit efficiencies based on equipment size

Controls Prescriptive Option

Thermal Comfort Mandatory Provisions Heating Efficiency Mandatory Provisions

Pipe Insulation Table 6.8.3

Elevators, Kitchens Equipment, Miscellaneous Load

Climate Zone Component

Air Conditioners, Air cooled: < 65 Mbh -14 SEER ≥ 65 Mbh - <135 Mbh - 12.7 IEER ≥ 135 Mbh - < 240 Mbh - 12.2 IEER ≥ 240 Mbh - < 760 Mbh -11.4 IEER ≥ 760 Mbh - 11 IEER Computer and VRF Air-to-Air unit efficiencies based on equipment size Efficiency Requirements for evaporative condensers with ammonia refrigerants

1. Economizer is required for units ≥ 54,000 Btuh, for computer rooms: ≥ 135,000 Btuh 1. Economizer is required for units ≥ 54,000 Btuh, for computer rooms: ≥ 135,000 Btuh Not required for residential spaces with system capacity ≤ 10,800 Btuh Not required for residential spaces with system capacity ≤ 10,800 Btuh 2. CV Systems ≥ 15,000 btuh shall have a temperature setback to 55F and 90F during unoccupied hours Integrated economizer is required for systems ≥65,000 Btuh and 2 two stages of cooling except spaces Sensor Accuracy requirements Section 6.5.1.1.6 with continuous operation (Mandatory) 2. CV Systems ≥ 15,000 btuh shall have a temperature setback to 55F and 90F during unoccupied hours 3. Optimum start controls for systems with greater than 10,000 cfm or Individual heating and cooling except spaces with continuous operation(Mandatory) systems with setback 3. Optimum start controls for systems with any DDC system Section 6.4.3.3.3 (Mandatory) controls and DDC (Mandatory) 4. All outdoor air intake and exhaust systems shall be equipped with Motorized Damper (Mandatory) 4. All outdoor air intake and exhaust systems shall be equipped with Motorized Damper (Mandatory) 5. Motorized damper air leakage 4 cfm/ft2 (Mandatory) 5. Motorized damper air leakage 4 cfm/ft2 (Mandatory) 6. Enclosed Parking Garage Ventilation systems shall detect contaminant level and to reduce air to 50% 6. Enclosed Parking Garage Ventilation systems shall detect contaminant level and to reduce air to 50% or less of design capacity. Exception: garage less 30,000 ft2 or less of design without cooling or heating (Mandatory) capacity. Exception: garage less 30,000 ft2 without cooling or heating (Mandatory) 7. Humidification Controls shall prevent the use of fossil fuel or electricity to produce 30RH in the warmest 7. DCV for spaces with > 500ft2, < 25 ft2/person and systems with OA > 3000 cfm or an air-side zone or to reduce RH to 60% in the coldest zone (Mandatory) economizer.(Exception: 8. DCV for spaces with > 500ft2, ≤ 25 ft2/person and systems with OA > 3000 cfm or an air-side Section 6.4.3.9) economizer.(Exception: Section 6.4.3.9) 8. Single Zone VAV Controls in compliance with section 6.4.3.10 (Mandatory) 9. Heating in Vestibules shall include automatic controls to shut off the heating when OAT ≥45F and 9. Sensible Heating panel & Radiant bottom floor Heating Insulation - R-3.5 (Mandatory) thermostat setpoint limited to 60F (Mandatory) 10. Where rehearing is permitted, zones that have both supply and return/exhaust opening shall not 10. DDC Control are required for systems with fan power > than 10 hp or cooling & Heating plants with > supply heating air 300 Mbh except systems that comply with Section 6.4.3.10 more than 20F above the space temperature setpoint (Mandatory) 11. VAV systems with DDC shall include means to reduce OA below design rates to change system 11. Sensible Heating panel & Radiant bottom floor Heating Insulation - R-3.5 (Mandatory) ventilation efficiency as 12. Walk-in Coolers/Freezers: Coolers door insulation R-25, freezers -R-32, freezer's floor insulation R-28, defined by App A of ASHRAE 62.1. Exception: system with ERW etc (Section 6.4.5)(Mandatory) 12. Multiple zone HVAC Systems must include controls to reset the SA temperature at least 25% of the 13. Refrigerated Display case: Lighting controls to reduce 50% lighting power, temperature control difference between (Section 6.4.6)(Mandatory) the SA temperature and the design room air temperature. 14. Where reheating is permitted, zones that have both supply and return/exhaust opening shall not 13 Pipe sizing limitations based on gpm. Table 6.5.4.5 supply heating air more than 20F above the space temperature setpoint 14. Limitation on Centrifugal Fan Open Circuit cooling towers listed in Table 6.8.1G 15. VAV systems with DDC shall include means to reduce OA below design rates to change system 15. MERV 13 Filter for ventilation systems, in accordance with ASHRAE 52.2-2007 (LEED V4) ventilation efficiency as defined by App A of ASHRAE 62.1. Office, Lobbies, Residential spaces : 75F/50% , Winter- 70F/35% Office, Lobbies, Residential spaces : 75F/50% , Winter- 70F/35% Kitchen: 70F/50%, and Winter -68F Kitchen: 70F/50%, and Winter -68F Fitness Room: 68-75F/50%, and Winter -68F Fitness Room: 68-75F/50%, and Winter -68F Stairwells - summer ambient, winter -55F Stairwells - summer ambient, winter -55F Utility Rooms - summer 89F, winter -55F Utility Rooms - summer 89F, winter -55F Vestibule - 60F Vestibule - 60F Gas Fired Furnace -80% Efficiency Gas Fired Furnace -80% Efficiency Gas-Fired Boilers: < 300 Mbh -80% Efficiency Gas-Fired Boilers: < 300 Mbh -82% Efficiency ≥ 300 Mbh - < 2,500 Mbh - 80% Efficiency ≥ 300 Mbh - < 2,500 Mbh - 80% Efficiency >2,500 Mbh 82% Efficiency >2,500 Mbh 82% Efficiency Electric Furnace with ≥ 225 mbh - 0.75% losses Electric Furnace with ≥ 225 mbh - 0.75% losses Insulation for 141-200F Temperature Range: Insulation for 141-200F Temperature Range: <1" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation <1" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation 1 to <1 1/2" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation 1 to <1 1/2" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation 1 1/2" to <4" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation 1 1/2" to <4" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation 4" to <8" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation 4" to <8" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation

1. Section 6.5.7 : Make-up air introduced into hood cavity of Kitchen exhaust hoods shall not exceed 1. Section 6.5.7 : Make-up air introduced intro hood cavity of Kitchen exhaust hoods shall not exceed 10% of the EA airflow 10% of the EA rate. Conditioned SA delivered to any space with a rate. Conditioned SA delivered to any space with a kitchen hood shall not exceed the supply flow kitchen hood shall not exceed the supply flow required to meet the space heating/cooling or the available required to meet the space transfer air from adjacent spaces. heating/cooling or the available transfer air from adjacent spaces. If kitchen exhaust hoods ≥ 5,000 cfm , each hood shall have an exhaust rate that complies with Table If kitchen exhaust hoods ≥ 5,000 cfm , each hood shall have an exhaust rate that complies with Table 6.5.7.1.3 and it shall have one of the following: a) at least 50% of 6.5.7.1.3 and it shall all replacement air is transfer air that would otherwise be exhausted b) DCV on at least 75% of EA c) ERW have one of the following: a) at least 50% of all replacement air is transfer air that would otherwise be on at least 50% of the EA. exhausted b) DCV on Lab exhaust systems ≥ 5,000 cfm shall include VAV exhaust or direct MA supply equal to 75% of the EA at least 75% of EA c) ERW on at least 50% of the EA. rate heated no warmer than 2F below room setpoint, cooled to Lab exhaust systems ≥ 5,000 cfm shall include VAV exhaust or direct MA supply equal to 75% of the EA no colder than 3F above room setpoint. rate heated no 2. Refrigeration display cases, walk-in coolers or walk-in freezers connected to remote compressors shall warmer than 2F below room setpoint, cooled to no colder than 3F above room setpoint. meet section 6.5.11 2. Elevator systems shall comply with section 10.4.3.(Lighting efficacy not less than 35 lumens/watt, cab 3. Freezers/Refrigerators efficiency in compliance with Table 6.8.1-12, 6.8.1-13 ventilators - max 4. Elevator systems shall comply with section 10.4.3 (Lighting efficacy not less than 35 lumens/watt, cab 0.33 W/cfm at max speed) ventilators - max 0.33 W/cfm at max speed) 3. Pool Heaters (Mandatory): heaters must be equipped with a readily accessible ON/OFF switch. Time 5. Pool Heaters (Mandatory): heaters must be equipped with a readily accessible ON/OFF switch. Time switches must be switches must be installed on pool heaters/pumps except those installed on pool heaters/pumps except those that require 24/7 operation that require 24/7 operation

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

5A System

CV System HP ≤ CFM * 0.0011 BHP ≤ CFM*0.00094+ A VAV System HP ≤ CFM * 0.0015 BHP ≤ CFM*0.0013+ A A = SUM (PD*CFM/4131) , PD from Table 6.5.3.1-2 (More stringent) 1. The fan BHP must be indicated with HP on the design documents 2. Fan efficiency shall have 67 FEG grade of higher. Total efficiency at the design point of operation shall be within 15 percentage points of the max total efficiency. Exception: fans with motor 5 hp or less. 3. All Units based on space temperature shall have 2-stage fan control with the minimum speed not exceed 66% of full load and 40% of fan power 4. All other units that control temperature by modulating the airflow to the space, shall have modulating fan controls. 5. Fractional HP motors ≥ 1/12 hp needs to be electronically-commutated motors or have a min. 70% efficiency in accordance with 10 CFR 4321 5. Motors efficiency must comply with EIA 2007 as shown in Table 10.8-1 6. Multiple-zone VAV System Ventilation Optimization Control

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Section 7: Service Water Heating Climate Zone 5A System

Hot Water

Plumbing fixtures: Lavatory - 0.5 gpm (0.4 gpm -Prescriptive Compliance) Residential Lavatory -2.2 gpm (1.5 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Water Closets - 1.6 gpf (1.28 gpf -Prescriptive Compliance) Urinal -1.0 gpf (0.5 gpf -Prescriptive Compliance) Showerhead - 2.5 gpm (2.0 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Kitchen Sink - 2.2 gpm (1.75 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Pre-rinse valve -1.3 gpm Dishwasher undercounter -1.6 gal/rack, single tank conveyor - 1 gal/rack 1. WH-1,2 Standby Loss: 20+35 √50 = 267.5 Btuh, SL Heat Recovery systems shall be installed for heating/preheating of hot water if the facility operates 24 hrs/day, the total installed heat rejection capacity of the water cooled systems exceeds 6,000 MBH of heat rejection and design service water heating load exceeds 1,000 MBH. 2. New Buildings with gas service HW Systems of 1,000 MBh or greater shall have min thermal efficiency of 90% except water heaters installed in individual dwelling units. 3. Fire pump motors must have minimum full load efficiency that is not less than as shown in Table 10.8-6 4. General purpose electric motors with a power rating of more than 200 hp, but not more than 500 hp must have minimum full load efficiency that is not less than as shown in Table 10.8-3 5. Service Water Pressure Booster System must be designed with the section 10.4.2 Table 7.8 in 90.1-2007 on page 57: Electric water heaters ≤ 12 kW Performance: 0.97-0.00035V EF >12 KW Perfomance:5.9+5.3/Vm %h Gas instant. water heaters: < 200 Mbh Performance: 0.62-0.0005V EF > 200 Mbh Performance: 80% or 80% (Q/800+110√V) SL, Btuh

ASHRAE 90.1-2010

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Interior Lighting: Office = 0.98-1.11 W/sqft Lobby/Waiting = 0.59-1.8 W/sqft (varies based on facility type) Corridors = 0.41-0.92 W/sqft Kitchen = 1.21 W/sqft Breakroom = 0.73-0.92 W/sqft Conference = 0.72-1.23 W/sqft Active Storage = 0.63-1.24 W/sqft Electrical / Mechanical = 0.42 W/sqft Restrooms = 0.98-1.21 W/sqft Data / Communication = 1.71 W/sqft Dining Area = 0.89 W/sqft Laundry = 0.6 W/sqft Apartments/Hotel Rooms = 0.91 W/sqft Exercise Area = 0.72 W/sqft Retail = 1.1 W/sqft Stairway = 0.69 W/SF

1. Occupancy sensor or time switch that turns lighting off within 30 minutes after the last occupant in conference/meeting and break/lunch rooms, classrooms, lecture halls, training rooms, storages, restrooms, locker/dressing, fitting rooms, offices less than 250 SF 2. Automatic shut off of Lighting is required in all spaces 3. Enclosed spaces must have Manual On or Automatic On to 50% or less control for general lighting 4. Enclosed spaces must have controls that reduce the power level by 30-70% of all connected load in addition to turning off all lighting 5. Automatic, multi-level daylighting controls must be installed in enclosed spaces with sidelit areas 250 SF or more and all toplit areas greater than 900 SF 6. Parking Garage Lighting must be reduced automatically by at least 30% of connected power when motion is not detected within 30 minutes. Automatic daylighting controls must be installed for perimeter lighting 7. All Installed lighting controls must be tested and documentation must be submitted certifying compliance 8. Automatic lighting controls for guestroom type spaces. Section 9.4.1.3 9. Continuous Dimming controls in secondary sidelighted areas, which is based on an installed wattage rather than area of the space 10. Submittal requirements

Component

Electrical Systems

Lighting Power Density (using space-by-space method) Prescriptive Option (All Controls are Mandatory Requirements)

ASHRAE 90.1 Standard does not apply to lighting within dwelling units or any emergency lighting

Power Section 8 Mandatory Provisions

1. Feeder Conductors shall be sized for a max. voltage drop of 2% at design load 2. Branch Circuits shall be sized for a max. voltage drop of 3% at design load 3. Automatic receptacle control for at least 50% of all 125-volt, 15- and 20 amp receptacles in all private offices =, conference rooms, printing/copy rooms, breakrooms, classrooms, and individual workstations except equipment for 24/7 operation. Controls shall function in compliance with section 8.4.2 4. Automatic receptacle control for at least 25% of branch circuits feeders installed for modular furniture not shown in construction document. 5. Electrical Energy Monitoring for total electrical use, HVAC Systems, Interior lighting, exterior lighting, receptacle circuits. All data shall be recorded for every 15 minutes with the data storage for 36 months and shall be available for a tenant. Exception: Building less than 25,000 ft2, dwelling units 6. Low-Voltage Dry-type Transformers shall comply with EPAct 2005 and efficiencies by Table 8.4.4. Exceptions based on EPAct 2005 and 10CFR 431 7. Section 10.4.5 Whole-Building Energy Monitoring: Gas, Chilled Water, Hot Water, Steam for every 60 minutes with the data storage for 36 months

Requirements based on the lighting zone 0,1,2,3 or 4. more stringent and detailed than ASHRAE 90.1-2007.

Site Exterior Lighting (All Controls are Mandatory Requirements)

Parking Lots and Drives - 0.04-13 W/SF Walkways <10 ft -0.7-1 W/lin ft Requirements based on the lighting zone 0,1,2,3 or 4. more stringent and detailed than ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Walkways ≥ 10 ft - 0.14-0.2 W/SF Main Entry - 20-30 W/lin ft 1. Lighting must be OFF during the day by photosensor Other Doors - 20 W/lin ft 2. Lighting is regulated during the night so it is either OFF or operating at a reduced level depending on the purpose of Canopies/Overhangs -0.6-1.0 W/ft2 the lighting Building façade -0.1-0.2 W/ft2 1. Lighting must be OFF during the day by photosensor 2. Lighting is regulated during the night so it is either OFF or operating at a reduced level depending on the purpose of the lighting

Climate Zone

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

ASHRAE 90.1-2016

Section 3 includes addtional definitons: metal-coiling door, lamp efficacy, IT equipment energy , power usage effectivness (PUE), PRV

Addional definitions: dimmer, driver, DX-dedicated outdoor air system units (DX-DOAS units), enthalpy recovery ratio, fluid economizer, IEC Design H motor, IEC Design N motor, indoor pool dehumidifier, integrated seasonal coefficient of performance (ISCOP), integrated seasonal moisture removal efficiency (ISMRE), moisture removal efficiency (MRE), NEMA Design A motor, NEMA Design B motor, NEMA Design C motor, networked guest room control system, regulated energy use, sidelighting effective aperture, unregulated energy use

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

ASHRAE 90.1-2016

Component

Section 3: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

System

---

Climate Zone

5A System

Component 5.4.3.1.1 Continuous Air Barrier Design / .2 Instalation: Minor revisions; essentially the same as ASHRAE 90.1-2013. Air leakage: Maximum air leakage threshold values have been added for sectional garage doors. (5.4.3.2) Air Barrier Mandatory Provision

Same as ASHRAE 90.1-2010

Whole building air leakage testing added to Section 5.4.3.1.3. Testing (and not exceeding 0.40 cfm/ft2 under 0.3 in. of water)) is now an option for compliance in addition to the existing continuous air barrier options. (5.4.3.1.3) If whole building testing is not performed, then an air barrier design and installation verification program is required. Loading Dock Weatherseals: Cargo doors and loading dock doors shall be equipped with weatherseals to restrict infiltration when vehicles are parked in teh doorway (5.4.3.3).

Prescriptive Option - Roofs

Appendix G Performance Rating added as a compliance path. (Previously it was used only to rate “beyond code” performance of buildings.) Climate zones updated. Some Indiana counties (including Marion) have shifted from 5A to 4A. cz5A and cz4A Non-Residential and Residential same as 2013: Insulation entirely above deck: assembly max U-0.032; R-30 c.i. (same as 2013cz5A and cz4A) Attic and other: assemvbly max U-0.021; R-49 (same as 2013cz5A and cz4A) Metal building: assembly max U-0.037; R-19 + R-11 Ls or R-25 + R-8 Ls (same as 2013cz5A and cz4A)

Section 5: Building Envelope

cz5A opaque wall requirments are the same as 2013; cz4A varies.

Prescriptive Option - Walls

Non-Residential: Steel-Framed Above Grade Wall, max U-0.055 (R-13 + R-10 ci) Mass Wall max U-0.090 (R-11.4 ci) Metal Building max U-0.050 (R-19 ci) Wood-Framed max U-0.051 (R-13 +R-7.5 ci) Residential: Mass Wall Assembly U-value -0.080 (R-13.3 ci) Air leakage requirement - not exceed 0.4cfm/SF of wall.

Non-Residential: Steel-Framed Above Grade Wall, U-Value max 0.055 (R-13 + R-10 ci) or max U-0.064 (R-13 + R-7.5 ci) Mass Wall U-value max 0.090 (R-11.4 ci) or max U-0.104 (R-9.5 ci) Metal Building max U-0.050 (R-19 ci) or max U-0.060 (R-15.8 ci) Wood-Framed max U-0.051 (R-13 + R-7.5 ci or R-19 + R-5 ci) or max U-0.064 (R-13 + R-3.8 ci or R-20) Below-grade max C-0.119 (R-7.5 ci) (same w/ cz4A) Residential same as 2013; cz4A varies. Mass Wall max U-0.080 (R-13.3 ci) or max U-0.090 (R-11.4 ci) Below-grade max C-0.092 (R-10 ci) (same w/ cz4A) Air leakage requirement: not exceed 0.4cfm/SF of wall. cz5A (and cz4A) opaque doors: nonresidential / residential: swinging / non-swinging U-0.500 max (same as cz4A); semiheated: swinging U-0.700 max.; non-swining U-1.450 max (same as cz4A).

Prescriptive Option - Floors

Prescriptive Option - Glazing

Climate Zone

5A System

Non-Residential: Slab-On-Grade Unheated: F-Value - 0.52, R-15 for 24" Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.057, R-14.6 ci

Non-Residential: same as 90.1-2013

Residential: Slab-On-Grade Unheated: F-Value - 0.51, R-20 for 24" Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: U-0.051, R-16.7 ci

Residential: Slab-On-Grade Unheated: same for cz5A or F-0.520, R-15 for 24" Exposed Mass Floor/Ceiling: same for cz5A and cz4A and 90.1-2013

All Areas 0-40% of Wall Area, all exposures.

Curtainwall System: Assembly: U-0.42, SHGC-0.40; VT/SHGC-1.10

Curtainwall System: Assembly: U-0.38, SHGC-0.38; VT/SHGC-1.10

Operable: Assembly: U-0.50, SHGC-0.40; VT/SHGC-1.1 0

Operable: Assembly: U-0.46, SHGC-0.38; VT/SHGC-1.10

Window, Fixed, Assembly: U-0.42, SHGC-0.4, VT/SHGC-1.10

Window, Fixed, Assembly: U-0.38, SHGC-0.38, VT/SHGC-1.10

Glass Door: U-0.77 SHGC-0.40; VT/SHGC-1.10

Glass Door: U-0.68 SHGC-0.38; VT/SHGC-1.10

Swinging Door: U-0.5

Swinging Door: U-0.370

Low-e requirements for storm window retrofits

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

ASHRAE 90.1-2016

Component Climate Zone 4-8*revised: System 1: Packaged PTAC with HW fossil boilers (Residential) System 3*revised: Packaged DX AC with gas-fired heat exchangers (Public Assembly <120,000 ft2, Retail and 2 floors or less, Non-Residential and 3 floors or less and <25,000 ft2)

Baseline HVAC System Type(s)

Same as ASHRAE 90.1-2013 New requirements have been added to section 6.1.1.3 to define requirements for replacement equipment which in prior versions of 90.1 were only required on new construction

System 9: Heating & Ventilation; warm air furance, gas fired; no cooling; with fossil fuel furnace (Heated Only Storage) System 12*new: Single-zone constant volume; chilled water, HW fossil fuel boiler (Public Assembly) Energy Recovery Section 6.5.6 Prescriptive Option

Replaces "energy recovery effectiveness" with "energy recovery ratio," which clarifies the intent of the standard with regard to the performance requirements of air-to-air heat exchangers. (Table 6.5.6.1-2) Exhaust Air Recovery Requirements for Ventilation Systems Operating Greater than or Equal to 8000 Hours per year: Design supply fan airflow rate (cfm) increased for 4A and 5A.

Fan Power Prescriptive Option

Same as ASHRAE 90.1-2013 with the following revisions: 6.5.3.2.4 Return and Relief Fan Control section added. 6.5.3.4 Parallel-Flow Fan-Powered VAV Air Terminal Control section added.

Air Conditioners, Air cooled: < 65 Mbh -14 SEER (same) ≥ 65 Mbh - <135 Mbh - 12.7 IEER (same) ≥ 135 Mbh - < 240 Mbh - 12.2 IEER (same) ≥ 240 Mbh - < 760 Mbh -11.4 IEER (same) ≥ 760 Mbh - 11 IEER (same) Table 6.8.1-7 One change was made to the table to increase the efficiency requirement for Propeller or axial fan closed-circuit cooling towers from 14.0 gpm/hp to 16.1 gpm/hp. Section 6.5.5.2 there are new requirements for cooling tower fan control.

Section 6: Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning

Cooling Efficiency Mandatory Provisions

Table 6.8.1-11 Computer Room Units Table 6.8.1-11 was totally revised to add 3 classification of computer units to reflect the trend in the industry to higher computer room operating temperatures: Class 1 – 75 F DB/52 F WB ... Class 2 – 85 F DB/52 F WB ... Class 3 – 95 F DB/52 F WB New COPc values were then defined for the various products and new categories. This goes along with revisions to the AHRI 1360 rating standard.

Computer and VRF Air-to-Air unit efficiencies based on equipment size Efficiency Requirements for evaporative condensers with ammonia refrigerants

Chilled Water Coil Selection In a new section 6.5.4.7 requirements have been added for chilled water coil selection. Revised Exhaust Air Energy Recovery Tables Transfer Air The requirements for exhaust systems and transfer air in 6.5.7.1 were revised Hydronic Variable Flow Systems The requirements for hydronic variable flow system in section 6,5,4,2 was modified to clarify that it applies to both heating and cooling pumping systems

Controls Prescriptive Option

Thermal Comfort Mandatory Provisions Heating Efficiency Mandatory Provisions

Pipe Insulation Table 6.8.3

Elevators, Kitchens Equipment, Miscellaneous Load

Climate Zone

1. Economizer is required for units ≥ 54,000 Btuh, for computer rooms: ≥ 135,000 Btuh Not required for residential spaces with system capacity ≤ 10,800 Btuh Integrated economizer is required for systems ≥65,000 Btuh and 2 two stages of cooling Sensor Accuracy requirements Section 6.5.1.1.6 2. CV Systems ≥ 15,000 btuh shall have a temperature setback to 55F and 90F during unoccupied hours except spaces with continuous operation(Mandatory) 3. Optimum start controls for systems with any DDC system Section 6.4.3.3.3 (Mandatory) 4. All outdoor air intake and exhaust systems shall be equipped with Motorized Damper (Mandatory) 5. Motorized damper air leakage 4 cfm/ft2 (Mandatory) 6. Enclosed Parking Garage Ventilation systems shall detect contaminant level and to reduce air to 50% or less of design capacity. Exception: garage less 30,000 ft2 without cooling or heating (Mandatory) 7. Humidification Controls shall prevent the use of fossil fuel or electricity to produce 30RH in the warmest zone or to reduce RH to 60% in the coldest zone (Mandatory) 8. DCV for spaces with > 500ft2, ≤ 25 ft2/person and systems with OA > 3000 cfm or an air-side economizer.(Exception: Section 6.4.3.9) 9. Heating in Vestibules shall include automatic controls to shut off the heating when OAT ≥45F and thermostat setpoint limited to 60F (Mandatory) 10. DDC Control are required for systems with fan power > than 10 hp or cooling & Heating plants with > 300 Mbh except systems that comply with Section 6.4.3.10 (Mandatory) 11. Sensible Heating panel & Radiant bottom floor Heating Insulation - R-3.5 (Mandatory) 12. Walk-in Coolers/Freezers: Coolers door insulation R-25, freezers -R-32, freezer's floor insulation R-28, etc (Section 6.4.5)(Mandatory) 13. Refrigerated Display case: Lighting controls to reduce 50% lighting power, temperature control (Section 6.4.6)(Mandatory) 14. Where reheating is permitted, zones that have both supply and return/exhaust opening shall not supply heating air more than 20F above the space temperature setpoint 15. VAV systems with DDC shall include means to reduce OA below design rates to change system ventilation efficiency as defined by App A of ASHRAE 62.1. Office, Lobbies, Residential spaces : 75F/50% , Winter- 70F/35% Kitchen: 70F/50%, and Winter -68F Fitness Room: 68-75F/50%, and Winter -68F Stairwells - summer ambient, winter -55F Utility Rooms - summer 89F, winter -55F Vestibule - 60F Gas Fired Furnace -80% Efficiency Gas-Fired Boilers: < 300 Mbh -82% Efficiency ≥ 300 Mbh - < 2,500 Mbh - 80% Efficiency >2,500 Mbh 82% Efficiency Electric Furnace with ≥ 225 mbh - 0.75% losses Insulation for 141-200F Temperature Range: <1" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation 1 to <1 1/2" pipe/tube size -1.5" insulation 1 1/2" to <4" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation 4" to <8" pipe/tube size - 2" insulation

Component

Chilled Water Plant Monitoring A new section was added for large chilled water plant monitoring. Control Setpoint Configuration Requirements In many of the controls requirements, it was stated that controls must be capable of some configuration. This has been changed to not only require that they are capable but they shall be configured to the defined requirement. Chilled and Hot Water Temperature Reset Control 6.5.4.4 Chilled and Hot Water Temperature Reset Control – A new requirement has been added to water temperature reset where DDC is used to control valves, the set point shall be reset based on valve positions until one valve is nearly wide open or setpoint limits of the system equipment or application have been reached. There are some exceptions. Economizer Control Diagnostics 1. Air-cooled direct-expansion cooling units listed in Tables 6.8.1-1 and 6.8.1-2, where an air economizer is installed in accordance with Section 6.5.1, shall include a fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) system complying with the following: 2. The outdoor air, supply air, and return temperature sensors shall be permanently installed to monitor system operation and the control shall include a means to display values 3. The control system shall be capable of and configured to display the specified faults. Return and Relief Fan Control New requirement: 6.5.3.2.4 Return and Relief Fan Control Return and relief fans used to meet Section 6.5.1.1.5 shall comply as required. Chilled Water Plant Monitoring A new section was added for large chilled water plant monitoring. Parallel-Flow Fan-Power VAV Terminal Control Set points and schedules for HVAC systems that automatically provide occupant thermal comfort via means other than directly controlling the air dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperature may be allowed to differ, provided that equivalent levels of occupant thermal comfort are demonstrated via the methodology in ASHRAE Standard 55, Section 5.3.3, “Elevated Air Speed,” or Standard 55, Appendix B, “Computer Program for Calculation of PMV-PPD.” Efficiency as of 3/2/2020: Gas Fired Furnace: 80% Efficiency (unchanged) Gas-Fired Boilers: < 300 Mbh: 82% Efficiency (unchanged) Gas-Fired Boilers: ≥ 300 Mbh and < 2,500 Mbh: 80% Efficiency (unchanged) Gas-Fired Boilers: >2,500 Mbh: 82% Efficiency (unchanged)

Same as ASHRAE 90.1-2013

1. Section 6.5.7.1: The requirements for exhaust systems and transfer air in 6.5.7.1 were revised. 1. Section 6.5.7 : Make-up air introduced intro hood cavity of Kitchen exhaust hoods shall not exceed 6.5.7.1 Transfer Air - Conditioned supply air delivered to any space with mechanical exhaust shall not 10% of the EA rate. Conditioned SA delivered to any space with a exceed the greater of kitchen hood shall not exceed the supply flow required to meet the space heating/cooling or the available a. the supply flow required to meet the space heating or cooling load; transfer air from adjacent spaces. b. the ventilation rate required by the authority having jurisdiction, the facility Environmental Health and If kitchen exhaust hoods ≥ 5,000 cfm , each hood shall have an exhaust rate that complies with Table Safety department, or ASHRAE Standard 62.1; or 6.5.7.1.3 and it shall have one of the following: a) at least 50% of c. the mechanical exhaust flow minus the available transfer air from conditioned spaces or return air all replacement air is transfer air that would otherwise be exhausted b) DCV on at least 75% of EA c) ERW plenums on the same floor, not in different smoke or fire compartments, and that at their closest point are on at least 50% of the EA. within 15 ft. of each other. Available transfer air is that portion of outdoor ventilation air that Lab exhaust systems ≥ 5,000 cfm shall include VAV exhaust or direct MA supply equal to 75% of the EA - is not required to satisfy other exhaust needs, rate heated no warmer than 2F below room setpoint, cooled to - is not required to maintain pressurization of other spaces, and no colder than 3F above room setpoint. - is transferable according to applicable codes and standards and to the class of air recirculation 2. Refrigeration display cases, walk-in coolers or walk-in freezers connected to remote compressors shall limitations in ASHRAE Standard 62.1. meet section 6.5.11 3. Freezers/Refrigerators efficiency in compliance with Table 6.8.1-12, 6.8.1-13 2. Refrigeration display cases, walk-in coolers or walk-in freezers connected to remote compressors shall 4. Elevator systems shall comply with section 10.4.3 (Lighting efficacy not less than 35 lumens/watt, cab meet section 6.5.11. (unchanged) ventilators - max 0.33 W/cfm at max speed) 3. Freezers/Refrigerators efficiency in compliance with Table 6.8.1-12, 6.8.1-13. (unchanged) 5. Pool Heaters (Mandatory): heaters must be equipped with a readily accessible ON/OFF switch. Time 4. Elevator systems shall comply with section 10.4.3 (Lighting efficacy not less than 33 lumens/watt, cab switches must be installed on pool heaters/pumps except those ventilators - max 0.33 W/cfm at max speed). (unchanged) that require 24/7 operation 5. Pool Heaters (Mandatory): heaters must be equipped with a readily accessible ON/OFF switch. Time switches must be installed on pool heaters/pumps except those that require 24/7 operation. (unchanged)

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

5A System

Air Conditioners, Air cooled: < 65 Mbh -14 SEER ≥ 65 Mbh - <135 Mbh - 12.7 IEER ≥ 135 Mbh - < 240 Mbh - 12.2 IEER ≥ 240 Mbh - < 760 Mbh -11.4 IEER ≥ 760 Mbh - 11 IEER

ASHRAE 90.1-2016

Section 7: Service Water Heating Climate Zone 5A System

Hot Water

Plumbing fixtures: Lavatory - 0.5 gpm (0.4 gpm -Prescriptive Compliance) Residential Lavatory -2.2 gpm (1.5 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Water Closets - 1.6 gpf (1.28 gpf -Prescriptive Compliance) Urinal -1.0 gpf (0.5 gpf -Prescriptive Compliance) Showerhead - 2.5 gpm (2.0 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Kitchen Sink - 2.2 gpm (1.75 gpm-Prescriptive Compliance) Pre-rinse valve -1.3 gpm Dishwasher undercounter -1.6 gal/rack, single tank conveyor - 1 gal/rack 1. WH-1,2 Standby Loss: 20+35 √50 = 267.5 Btuh, SL Heat Recovery systems shall be installed for heating/preheating of hot water if the facility operates 24 hrs/day, the total installed heat rejection capacity of the water cooled systems exceeds 6,000 MBH of heat rejection and design service water heating load exceeds 1,000 MBH. 2. New Buildings with gas service HW Systems of 1,000 MBh or greater shall have min thermal efficiency of 90% except water heaters installed in individual dwelling units. 3. Fire pump motors must have minimum full load efficiency that is not less than as shown in Table 10.8-6 4. General purpose electric motors with a power rating of more than 200 hp, but not more than 500 hp must have minimum full load efficiency that is not less than as shown in Table 10.8-3 5. Service Water Pressure Booster System must be designed with the section 10.4.2 Table 7.8 in 90.1-2007 on page 57: Electric water heaters ≤ 12 kW Performance: 0.97-0.00035V EF >12 KW Perfomance:5.9+5.3/Vm %h Gas instant. water heaters: < 200 Mbh Performance: 0.62-0.0005V EF > 200 Mbh Performance: 80% or 80% (Q/800+110√V) SL, Btuh

ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Revisions for 2016: In 7.4.3 regarding service hot water piping insulation, a new requirement was added to require the first 8 ft. of branch piping connecting to recirculated, heat-traced, or impedance heated piping to be insulated. In Table 7.8, which defines the minimum efficiency for water heating equipment, the requirements for the following products were moved to an Informative Appendix and referenced to the U.S. Department of Energy requirements and applicable test procedures found in the Code of Federal Regulations 10 CFR Part 430: a. Electric table top water heaters with a storage capacity ≥ 20 gal b. Electric water heaters < 12 kW and with a storage capacity ≥ 20 gal c. Heat pump water heaters with ≤ 24 amps power and ≤ 250 volts power supply d. Gas storage water heaters < 75,000 Btu/h and > 20 gallons e. Oil storage water heaters < 105,000 Btu/h and > 20 gallons

ASHRAE 90.1-2016

Component

Reduced Lighting Power Allowance – Exterior, Interior, Retail Display - Primarily based on improved efficacy of LED lighting - Exterior lighting power reduced an average of 30% - Interior space-by-space reduced an average of 26% - Retail display reduced ~25% Note: Allowances for decorative lighting were also reduced ~25% from 1.0 W/ft2 to 0.75 W/ft2 to reflect LED technology

Lighting Power Density (using space-by-space method) Prescriptive Option (All Controls are Mandatory Requirements)

Electrical Systems

Interior Lighting: Office = 0.81-0.93 W/sqft Lobby/Waiting = 0.45-2.03 W/sqft (varies based on facility type) Corridors = 0.29-0.92 W/sqft Kitchen = 1.06 W/sqft Breakroom = 0.62-0.78 W/sqft Conference = 1.07 W/sqft Active Storage = 0.46-0.97 W/sqft Electrical / Mechanical = 0.43 W/sqft Restrooms = 0.85-0.96 W/sqft Computer Room (rather than Data / Communication) = 1.33 W/sqft Dining Area = 0.63-2.00 W/sqft Laundry = 0.43 W/sqft Guest Room (rather than Apartments/Hotel Rooms) = 0.77 W/sqft Exercise Area = 0.50 W/sqft Retail = 0.50-0.90 W/sqft Stairwell (Stairway now governed by space containing it) = 0.58 W/SF

1. Occupancy sensor or time switch that turns lighting off within 30 minutes after the last occupant in conference/meeting and break/lunch rooms, classrooms, lecture halls, training rooms, storages, restrooms, locker/dressing, fitting rooms, offices less than 250 SF 2. Automatic shut off of Lighting is required in all spaces 3. Enclosed spaces must have Manual On or Automatic On to 50% or less control for general lighting 4. Enclosed spaces must have controls that reduce the power level by 30-70% of all connected load in addition to turning off all lighting 5. Automatic, multi-level daylighting controls must be installed in enclosed spaces with sidelit areas 250 SF or more and all toplit areas greater than 900 SF 6. Parking Garage Lighting must be reduced automatically by at least 50% of connected power when motion is not detected within 30 minutes. Automatic daylighting controls must be installed for perimeter lighting 7. All Installed lighting controls must be tested and documentation must be submitted certifying compliance 8. Automatic lighting controls for guestroom type spaces. Section 9.4.1.3 9. Continuous Dimming controls in secondary sidelighted areas, which is based on an installed wattage rather than area of the space 10. Submittal requirements New: Lighting in open-plan office spaces will be allowed to turn on automatically to more than 50% (i.e. full auto-on) New: New requirements for parking areas with shorter poles (24ft or less) and lights greater than 78 W

ASHRAE 90.1 Standard does not apply to lighting within dwelling units or any emergency lighting New: Dwelling Unit Lighting: Apartments, condos, living space must have at least 75% of permanently installed fixtures with minimum lamp efficacy of 55 lumens/Watt ... Likely requires LED or fluorescent

Power Section 8 Mandatory Provisions

50% of receptacles (wall plugs) in a space must have automatic shutoff control: - Private offices, conference rooms, print/copy, breakroom, classroom individual workstations - Requires automatic control (ex: occupancy sensor or time-of-day schedule) - Controlled receptacles must be marked and uniformly distributed - Plug-in type devices do not comply

Requirements based on the lighting zone 0,1,2,3 or 4. more stringent and detailed than ASHRAE 90.1-2013.

Site Exterior Lighting (All Controls are Mandatory Requirements)

Requirements based on the lighting zone 0,1,2,3 or 4. more stringent and detailed than ASHRAE 90.1-2010. 1. Lighting must be OFF during the day by photosensor 2. Lighting is regulated during the night so it is either OFF or operating at a reduced level depending on the purpose of the lighting

Parking Lots and Drives - 0.03-0.08 W/SF Walkways <10 ft - 0.5-0.7 W/lin ft Walkways ≥ 10 ft - 0.10-0.14 W/SF Main Entry - 14-21 W/lin ft Canopies/Overhangs - 0.20-0.40 W/ft2 Building façade - No allowance or 0.1-0.2 W/ft2 1. Lighting must be OFF during the day by photosensor 2. Lighting is regulated during the night so it is either OFF or operating at a reduced level depending on the purpose of the lighting

APPENDIX B: CASE STUDY B-H BUSINESS – HIGHER EDUCATION This appendix includes the following information: a. b. c. d. e.

Project cost breakdown. Average fiscal impact breakdown. Itemized compliance measures. COMcheck compliance reports. Energy simulation summary reports.

B-H: Final Cost of Work Bid Package 01

Bid Package Scope Description Temporary Construction

Final Costs (2017) $0

Today (2020) $0

Guardrail Maint.

$250,015

$273,198

Temporary Heating/Cooling

$128,345

$140,246

Temporary Stone Access

$72,058

$78,740

Final Cleaning

$47,405

$51,801

Field Engineering

$9,564

$10,451

Exterior Consultant

$26,175

$28,602

02A

Building Demolition

02B

Sitework, Site Utilities

02C

Termite Control

$118,000

$128,942

$1,452,191

$1,586,848

$6,750

$7,376

Concrete Superstructure

$5,781,058

$6,317,118

Masonry

$1,286,367

$1,405,648

Structural Steel

$1,152,165

$1,259,002

06A

General Trades

$1,516,947

$1,657,609

06B

06B Architectural Millwork

$240,359

$262,647

07A

Waterproofing, Air Barrier

$499,512

$545,830

07B

Metal Panels

$129,810

$141,847

07C

Roofing

$620,667

$678,220

07D

Firestopping

$163,659

$178,835

07E

Fireproofing

08C

Curtainwall

08D

Storefront

08E

Overhead Coiling Doors

09A

Metal Studs, Drywall

09B 09C

$21,400

$23,384

$1,850,710

$2,022,321

$478,500

$522,870

$17,911

$19,572

$2,507,713

$2,740,246

Hard Tile

$224,025

$244,798

Resilient Flooring

$475,320

$519,395

09D

Painting

$281,827

$307,960

09E

Perimeter Metal Stud & Sheathing

$420,000

$458,945

10A

Interior and Exterior Signage

$51,396

$56,162

12A

Window Treatments

$135,318

$147,866

12B

Office Glass Partitions

$200,943

$219,576

12C

Laboratory Casework

$2,771,228

$3,028,196

Elevators

$584,820

$639,049

14B

Bridge Cranes

$107,850

$117,851

Fire Suppression

$464,775

$507,872

Plumbing

$2,146,492

$2,345,530

Mechanical

$6,996,061

$7,644,785

Electrical

$5,301,753

$5,793,369

32A

Site Concrete

$188,698

$206,195

32C

Asphalt Pavement

$61,164

$66,836

Construction Fence

$33,835

$36,972

$38,822,786

$42,422,706

Total Spend

B-H: Average Fiscal Impact Category

System

Above Grade Wall Construction

$100,476

Below Grade Wall Construction

$49,067

Roof Construction

$71,873

Air Distribution

$27,333

Cooling

$750

Heating

$750

Electrical Power

Lighting

Lighitng Control

$9,430

Service Heating

Cost Impact Percent Cost Impact Total Cost Impact per Square Foot

Cost

$4,668 -$3,133

$261,213 0.51% $2.74

B-H: ASHRAE 90.1 Compliance - Itemized Changes Item No. 0701

Title [Step-back] Reduce insulation in brick veneer walls by 1/2 inch.

0702

Compliance 90.1-2007

Section Envelope

Type Performance

Cost Impact -$14,006.80

Assumptions CM take-offs from GMP: -$.40/SF

[Step-back] Eliminate spray foam at vertical The XPS within the brick veneer features spray foam at vertical joints in brick veneer wall system. joints as a measure to ensure that the envelope has an effective air barrier. The 2007 edition of the standard does not call for a continuous air barrier. This shall be eliminated and the rated Rvalue of the XPS may remain and therefore comply with the code.

90.1-2007

Envelope

Mandatory

-$87,542.50

CM take-offs from GMP: $2.50/LF

1001

Increase insulation in foundation walls by 1/2 inch.

90.1-2010

Envelope

Performance

-$101,549.30 $7,976.00

Total for 2007 step-back. CM take-offs from GMP: + 0.40/SF

1002

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2010

Project Controls

Mandatory

1003

Mandatory requirement.

1004

Mandatory requirement.

1005

Mandatory requirement.

1006

Mandatory requirement.

1007 1008

Description The primary opaque wall assembly is the brick veneer assembly. This wall system features 3" of XPS insulation. This layer shall be reduced by a half inch to 2-1/2" of XPS.

1-1/2" of rigid XPS perimeter insulation. This shall be increased to 2" of XPS. This shall occur across all 19,940 square feet of belowgrade foundation wall. [8.4.2] At least 50% of all 125 volt 15- and 20-Amp receptacles are controlled by an automatic control device.

[9.4.1.4] Sidelighted areas equal to or exceeding 250sf shall be separately controlled by at least one multilevel photocontrol (including continuous dimming devices).

90.1-2010

[9.4.1.6] Additional lighting controls: Task-lighing to have readilyaccessible controls [9.4.1.6] Additional lighting controls: Stairwell lighting - one more control devices to automatically reduce lighting power in any one controlled zone by at least 50% withing 30 minutes of all occupants leaving the room. [9.4.2] Exit signs do not exceed 5 watts per face.

90.1-2010

Mandatory requirement. Mandatory requirement.

Branch circuits sized for maximum drop of 3%. [6.5.3.3] Multiple zone VAV systems with DDC of individual zone boxes have static pressure setpoint reset controls.

90.1-2010 90.1-2010

1009

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.3.4] Multiple zone HVAC systems have supply air temperature reset controls.

1301

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$7,503.00

$14,260.00

All private offices, classrooms, conference rooms, break rooms and individual workstations should have 50% of the receptacles on a automatic shut off. This could be a centralized time of day control for the circuit or it could be an occupancy sensor in the room that shuts them off. Exemptions: receptacles for 24/7 equipment or life safety. Occupancy sensors already included in each space.Cost includes powerpack and labor on 50% of receptacles in spaces noted above. Approximately 366 receptacles total or 183 with auto control device. Spaces that are enclosed with 250sf of windows need to have daylighting controls. Lights should be able to dim or control to multiple lighting levels. Primary sidelighted area is an area on a plan directly adjacent to each vertical glazing, one window head height deep into the area, and window width plus 0.5 times window head height wide on each side of the rough opening of the window. 62 enclosed perimeter rooms x ($150 sensor + $30 low voltage cable from sensor to power pack + ($10 dimming cable premium x 5 fixtures/room)). LED lighting comes with 0-10V dimming standard. No cost. Task lighting is part of the FF&E Package and would have an on/off switch standard with task lighting provided. No cost. Occupancy sensors provided in stairwells. Cost would be 2 stairwells x 4 floors x $200/EA for switch = $1,600

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Wattage Plan Review Mandatory HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

No cost change; a matter specification.

$0.00 $0.00

No cost change per electrical sub This is a basic component of all VAV systems at this point. It would be hard to spec a system without this. No additional cost. ACB-03 is the only one with static pressure control - drawings page 355. ACB-01 and ACB-02 are both constant volume 100% OA systems. Static pressure reset needs to be added to ACB-03. No cost. Wouldn't apply to non-VAV systems.

90.1-2010

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

Increase insulation in foundation walls by 1- 1-1/2" of rigid XPS perimeter insulation. This shall be increased to 1/2 inches above item 1001. 3.5" of XPS. This shall occur across all 19,940 square feet of below-grade foundation wall. Changed insulation brick veneer wall type The baseline brick veneer wall system features 3 inches of XPS from 3" of XPS to 3" of polyiso. insulation. This shall be changed to polyisocyanurate.

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$29,739.00 $39,880.00

This is a basic component of all VAV systems at this point. It would be hard to spec a system without this. No additional cost. Temperature reset control is needed. No cost. Standard option for equipment. Total for 2010 step-forward. CM take-offs from GMP: $2.00/SF

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$31,515.30

CM take-offs from GMP: +$0.90/SF

1303

Updated WW-1 to UT system

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$4,056.00

CM take-offs from GMP: +$6.00/SF

1304

Updated 1600 WS 2 CW to UT system

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$138,396.00

1305

Added R-30 min. mineral wool insulation to 8" stud framing of brick veneer

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$122,559.50

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$2,400.00

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$190,547.20

CM take-offs from GMP: +$7.60/SF

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$25,072.00

CM take-offs from GMP: +$1.00/SF

90.1-2013

Envelope

Performance

$99,344.00

CM take-offs from GMP: +$3.50/SF

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$4,830.00

1302

1306

1307

1308

1309 1310

1311

The WW-1 BOD Kawneer 1600 Wall System 1 shall be changed to the "ultra thermal" 1600 UT version of the system. The CW BOD Kawneer 1600 Wall System 2 shall be changed to the "ultra thermal" 1600 UT version of the system.

The baseline brick veneer wall type features 8 inche steel framing without batt insulation infill. The framing shall be infilled with a rated R-30 mineral wool batt insulation product. Upgraded high-bay rolling door to Insulated The baseline high-bay rolling door was assumed to be equivalent sectional steel door to a BOD Overhead Door insulated rooling door (U-0.84). This shall be upgraded to a BOD Overhead Door insulated sectional steel back door (U-0.10) Increased roof insulation from R-20 min. to The R-20 minimum tapered polyisocyanurate insulation above the R-44 min. roof deck is assumed to exhibit an average thickness of 4 inches. This shall be increased by 4 inches overall to an R-44 minumum and an 8 inch average. Increased entry canopy and rooftop elect Though there is limited space to do so on the main entry canopy, room tapered insulation by 1" to coply with the above-deck insulation atop the entry canopy and rooftop prescriptive minimums. electrical roof areas shall be increased by 1 inch to an a 2.5 inch minimum. Added 2.5" of XPS under entire slab-onThe entire basement slab shall receive 2-1/2 inches of under-slab grade XPS insulation. Mandatory requirement. [9.4.1.1.b] Interior Lighting Controls - Either "restricted to manual ON" or "restricted to partial automatric ON" where no more than 50% of the lighting power for the general lightings shall be allowed to be automatically turned on and none of the remaining lighting shall be automatically turned on. Mandatory requirement. [9.4.1.1.d] Interior Lighting Controls - Bilevel Lighting Control

90.1-2010

$0.00

Increase $6.00/SF; note that CW-1, CW-2, CW-4, and CW-5 all have WS2. Unclear where CW-3 (274SF) is located; but considered part of this change. CM take-offs from GMP: +$3.50/SF

CM take-offs from GMP: +$15/SF

If you end up having lighting controls or lighting tied into BAS, this should just be a little extra programming or already included. No cost. Programming of lighting controls included, Occ sensors shown for other areas Changing the type of switching or potentially adding another zone of lights to allow a 30%, 50% and 70% lighting option between ON and OFF. No additional cost for dimming switch, includes $10 cost premium for dimming cable per light fixture for 50% of total light fixtures not including exit signs or exterior lighting. 965 total x 50% = 483 ea, Note other fixtures have dimming cable as part of 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4]

1312

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$9,200.00

1313

Mandatory requirement.

1314

Perimeter rooms covered under 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4]. Assume areas with 4+ fixtures to be over 150W. Add 10 areas per floor x 4 floors x ($150 sensor + $30 low voltage cable from sensor to power pack + ($10 dimming cable premium x 5 fixtures/room)). LED lighting comes with 0-10V dimming standard.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

No cost. Included in 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4] and 90.1-2013 [9.4.1.1.e]

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.3.1.3] Fan have efficiency grade (FEG) >= 67. The total efficiency of the fan at the design point of operation <=15% of maximum total efficiency of the fan.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

1315

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$500.00

1316

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.3.2.2] VAV fans have static pressure sensors positioned so setpoint <=1.2 in. w.c. design pressure.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

1317

Mandatory requirement.

REVISED [6.5.3.2.3] New requirements on provide contols system: Zone damper monitoring or indicator of static pressure need; autodetection, alarm, and operator override of zones excessively triggering reset logic.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

As designed, the exhaust fan for ACB02 is only 65 and the return fan for ACB03 is only 61. They would need upgraded. However, the team consulted with the system manufacturer whose units were installed. The manufacturer confirmed that their fans met this criteria. Through our investigation, we have arrived to the assumption that most/all high-end manufacturers already meet this criteria. It may be a premium for more standard "off-the-shelf" RTUs. On this job, there is no cost increase. Restroom exhaust fans have ECM with speed controller. Fan coil unit fans do not appear to comply. FCD models are AC fan motor - FED model is EC motor - EC motors needed to comply. BCHD models seem to all be standardized as EC motors so these should comply. These are tiny motors. Small premium (if any) on a small unit that is a small part of the project. Negigible cost change. Plugging $500 to cover the premium. Currently programmed to setpoint of 1.5"wc. (pg 354-355). Should just be a control set point update. $180/box per ALC rep (1 hour tech time per box); however this cost is covered by initial programming time. (page 296 specs) - VAV terminal units to have AO and AI of Damper Position. Seems to have a majority if not all of this capability with existing controls. No additional cost per ALC rep.

1318

Mandatory requirement.

REVISED [6.4.3.8]] Demand control ventilation provided for spaces >500 ft2 and >25 people/1000 ft2 occupant density and served by systems with air side economizer, auto modulating outside air demper control, or design airflow >3,000 cfm.

90.1-2013

HVAC

Mandatory

$81,500.00

1319

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.2.4.2] Humidification system dispersion tube hot surfaces in the airstreams of ducts or air-handling units insulated >= R-0.5.

90.1-2013

HVAC

Mandatory

$4,500.00

1601

All baseline 20% gray fritted glass shall be changed to 60% gray. This includes the spandrel glazing. Reduce C2 fixture count by 10% or 3 fixtures (27 total). C2: FIN Lighting Fixtures: TYPE C2 - 4' LED Lamp - 120

90.1-2016

Envelope

Performance

$754,300.00 $0.00

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting Performance

-$900.00

Reduce C2A fixture count by 10% or 4 fixtures (32 total). C2A: FIN Lighting Fixtures: TYPE C2A - 8' LED FIN - 120

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting Performance

-$1,600.00

CM take-offs from GMP: -$400/EA

Reduce C2 fixture count by 10% or 6 fixtures (50 total). C7: Axis Lighting Slim 2X SurroundLight: Pendant Light - 8'

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting Performance

-$2,400.00

CM take-offs from GMP: -$400/EA

Reduce C7A fixture count by 10% or 9 fixtures (86 total). C7A: Axis Lighting Slim 2X SurroundLight: Pendant Light - 12'

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting Performance

-$4,500.00

CM take-offs from GMP: -$500/EA

1602

Increased 20% gray frit to 60% on all fritted glass (and spandrel) Reduced lighting fixtures in open office areas by 10% (except for undercabinet fixture type M1): Type C2 Reduced lighting fixtures in open office areas by 10% (except for undercabinet fixture type M1): Type C2A Reduced lighting fixtures in open office areas by 10% (except for undercabinet fixture type M1): Type C7 Reduced lighting fixtures in open office areas by 10% (except for undercabinet fixture type M1): Type C7A Mandatory requirement.

Envelope

Mandatory

$2,500.00

Per CM data, +$2,500/EA

Mandatory requirement.

[5.4.3.3] Loading Dock Weatherseals: Cargo doors and loading dock doors shall be equipped with weatherseals to restrict infiltration when vehicles are parked in the doorway. [8.4.3a] Monitoring - Measurement device(s) shall be installed to measure total electrical energy.

90.1-2016

1603

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$6,500.00

1604

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

1605

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1606

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1607

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1608

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

No cost. Very similar to criteria in 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4] and 90.1-2013 [9.4.1.1.e]

1609

Mandatory requirement.

Need to monitor total electric and electric consumption of each of the following: HVAC, interior lighting, exterior lighting and receptacle circuits. So if designed and single line done, could be 5 electric meters at a minimum. If tenants, those need to be metered separately too. (this addresses the following few items), 5 Meters x ($2,500/meter + 4 hrs * $75/hr) Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

90.1-2016

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

1610

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.4.7] Chilled-water cooling coils provide a 15*F or higher temperature difference between leaving and entering water temperatures and a minimum 57*F leaving water temperatures at design conditions.

90.1-2016

HVAC

$0.00

Does not require. As a worst case scenario, the project team would need to assume that every room on the VAV box would need fin tube heating. However it seems like all rooms that could possibly need fin tube heating probably have it already so we are probably looking at the best case scenario: programming changes, which the system would already require. Again, the language is a bit vague. Note that the operative word is "can", not "shall". Most automation systems have this capability already so long as the points are landed. Some zones will just require reheat or interior cooling/perimeter heat regardless. As worded and given the current technology in the market, this is considered a zero cost item. Pg 203 schedule shows 12F delta on water side. Design does not comply. Fan coil units don't need to comply. Constant volume systems do not need to comply. Worst case scenario, need to upsize fan and cooling coil for ACB-03. This requirement should reduce the cost of the chilled water system because higher delta-T = less flow = smaller pipe and pump sizes. There's a chance the chiller might cost more. We are presuming this would be a wash in terms of cost. Total for 2013 step-forward.

1601

Mandatory

-$400.00

They would need to add CO2 sensors to all spaces >500sf and >25 ppl/1000ft2. They seem to have the other things they would need besides: CO2 sensors, programming for DCV, and may need to add OA airflow measuring station(s). It is appoximated that the CO2 sensors would be required in the following quantities: 11 on Level 0, 21 on Level 1, 21 on Level 2, and 21 on Level 3. This totals 74 occupancy sensors. It is assumed that no less than one airflow station will be required per AHU. Installer feedback indicated an installed cost of $1,000 per CO2 sensor and $2,500 per airflow station. Many modern humidifiers have this. Small cost impact. Need to confirm with a cut sheet if base design had this. Assuming GMP premium 3.8% on the cost of the humidifier. Maybe $1000 or $2000 per humidifier. Assuming $1500 per humidifier. One humidifer in each of the tree AHUs. Total for 2013 step-forward. Per CM data, standard Frit pattern at $2.00/SF; should be no additional cost to change one standard pattern to another. CM take-offs from GMP: -$300/EA

-$101,549.30

90.1-2007 Code-Compliance

$29,739.00

90.1-2010 Code-Compliance

$754,300.00

90.1-2013 Code-Compliance

-$400.00

90.12016 Code-Compliance

$170,522.43

Average cost premium per edition update

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction 20%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Building Area

Designer/Contractor: IN

Floor Area

1-Office : Nonresidential

107846

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Floor: Slab-On-Grade: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, Vertical 1 ft., [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (d) Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls: Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 1: Insulation Enitirely Above Deck: Other Insulation Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 2: Entry Canopy / Roof Elec Room: Other Insulation Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding: Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1: WW-1 (GL 1 2): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 2: WW-1 (GL 3 4): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.23, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 3: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 1 2): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.39, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 4: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 3 4 5 6): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.30, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 5: CW 3 (GL 1 2) (Clearwall): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.41, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Glazed Entry Doors: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.24, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 2: Coiling Door: Other Door, Non-Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Exterior Wall 3: CW w/ GL-E7/E8 Spandrel: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 0.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim: Other Mass Wall,

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1004

---

7.5

0.600

19959

---

0.037

0.108

25166

---

0.030

0.048

455

---

0.039

0.048

43178

---

0.053

0.064

---

0.380

0.450

544

---

0.380

0.450

447

---

0.320

0.450

12825

---

0.330

0.450

404

---

0.320

0.450

204

---

0.430

0.800

80 8613

-----

0.840 0.370

0.500 0.064

365

---

0.061

0.090

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 00 - 2007 Baseline (90_12007).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 24

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room: Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Door 3: Insulated Metal: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (a) (b) (c) (d)

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

391

---

0.048

0.064

---

0.360

0.700

Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONLY, and are not code requirements. 'Other' components require supporting documentation for proposed U-factors. Fenestration product performance must be certified in accordance with NFRC and requires supporting documentation. Slab-On-Grade proposed and budget U-factors shown in table are F-factors.

Envelope PASSES: Design 1% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 00 - 2007 Baseline (90_12007).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 24

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category 1-Common Space Types:Laboratory 2-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan 3-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical 4-Common Space Types:Corridor/Transition 5-Common Space Types:Restrooms

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

36467 29205 14345 15544 2044

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

1.40 1.10 1.50 0.50 0.90

51054 32126 21518 7772 1840

Total Allowed Watts =

114308

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1-Common Space Types:Laboratory LED 1: Other: LED 2: LED Linear 33W: LED 15: Other:

1 1 1

65 221 8

240 33 240

15600 7293 1920

1 1 1 1 1

30 36 56 95 12

48 95 120 180 10

1440 3420 6720 17100 120

1 1

22 92

36 45

792 4140

1 1 1 1

137 48 41 40

16 47 16 40

2192 2256 656 1600

2-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan LED 3: LED Other Fixture Unit 50W: LED 4: LED Other Fixture Unit 95W: LED 5: Other: LED 6: Other: LED 16: LED A Lamp 11W:

3-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical LED 7: LED Panel 36W: LED 8: LED Other Fixture Unit 46W:

4-Common Space Types:Corridor/Transition LED 9: LED A Lamp 13W: LED 10: LED Other Fixture Unit 46W: LED 11: LED Linear 15W: LED 14: Other:

5-Common Space Types:Restrooms LED 12: LED A Lamp 13W: LED 13: LED Other Fixture Unit 40W:

1 1

20 16 11 30 Total Proposed Watts =

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 00 - 2007 Baseline (90_12007).cck

320 330 65899

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 24

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 42% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 00 - 2007 Baseline (90_12007).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 24

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Illuminated length of wall or surface Walkway < 10 feet wide

180 ft 360 ft of

C Allowed Watts / Unit 5 1

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

No Yes

900 360 360 1260 63

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 63 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

Illuminated length of wall or surface (180 ft): Non-tradable Wattage LED 1: Other:

640

Walkway < 10 feet wide (360 ft of walkway length): Tradable Wattage LED 2: Other:

1 4 75 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

300 300

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 29% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 00 - 2007 Baseline (90_12007).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 5 of 24

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

ACB-01 (Multiple-Zone w/ PerimeterSystem): Heating: 1 each - Hydronic or Steam Coil, Steam, Capacity = 2803 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Hydronic Coil, Capacity = 3981 kBtu/h, No Economizer, Economizer exception: Humidity Requirements No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: ACB01 | Laboratory -- Compliance (Brake HP method) : Fails: ACB01 : Nameplate hp is greater than max nameplate hp Fans: ACB01 Supply, Multi-Zone VAV, 24743 CFM, 80.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (17.6 max. BHP) MHER01 Exhaust, Multi-Zone VAV, 28454 CFM, 50.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (11.4 max. BHP) Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 4.8414 credit Return and/or exhaust airflow control devices, 4.8414 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 8.7146 credit

ACB02 (Multiple-Zone w/ PerimeterSystem): Heating: 1 each - Hydronic or Steam Coil, Steam, Capacity = 1577 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Hydronic Coil, Capacity = 2239 kBtu/h, No Economizer, Economizer exception: Humidity Requirements No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: ACB02 | Office Chilled Beam -- Compliance (Brake HP method) : Fails: ACB02 : Nameplate hp is greater than max nameplate hp Fans: ACB02 Supply, Constant Volume, 17390 CFM, 40.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (16.6 max. BHP) GER01 Exhaust, Constant Volume, 10255 CFM, 15.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (7.0 max. BHP) Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 2.7233 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 4.9020 credit

ACB03 (Multiple-Zone w/ PerimeterSystem): Heating: 1 each - Hydronic or Steam Coil, Steam, Capacity = 437 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Hydronic Coil, Capacity = 842 kBtu/h, Air Economizer No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: ACB03 | Office VAV -- Compliance (Brake HP method) : Fails: ACB03 : Nameplate hp is greater than max nameplate hp Fans: ACB03 Supply, Multi-Zone VAV, 11753 CFM, 30.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (9.8 max. BHP) ACB03 Return, Multi-Zone VAV, 9112 CFM, 10.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (0.6 max. BHP) Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 1.9366 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 3.4858 credit

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 00 - 2007 Baseline (90_12007).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 6 of 24

Quantity System Type & Description 1

DWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 50 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

LWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 70 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 00 - 2007 Baseline (90_12007).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 7 of 24

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction 20%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Building Area

Designer/Contractor: IN

Floor Area

1-Office : Nonresidential

107846

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1004

---

7.5

0.600

19959

---

0.037

0.108

25166

---

0.030

0.048

455

---

0.039

0.048

43178

---

0.061

0.064

---

0.380

0.450

544

---

0.380

0.450

447

---

0.320

0.450

12825

---

0.330

0.450

404

---

0.320

0.450

204

---

0.430

0.800

80 8613

-----

0.840 0.370

0.500 0.064

365

---

0.061

0.090

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2007 Compliance (Step-backPage 1 of 24 measures) (90_1-2007).cck

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

391

---

0.048

0.064

---

0.360

0.700

Envelope PASSES: Design 0.5% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

36467 29205 14345 15544 2044

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

1.40 1.10 1.50 0.50 0.90

51054 32126 21518 7772 1840

Total Allowed Watts =

114308

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1-Common Space Types:Laboratory LED 1: Other: LED 2: LED Linear 33W: LED 15: Other:

1 1 1

65 221 8

240 33 240

15600 7293 1920

1 1 1 1 1

30 36 56 95 12

48 95 120 180 10

1440 3420 6720 17100 120

1 1

22 92

36 45

792 4140

1 1 1 1

137 48 41 40

16 47 16 40

2192 2256 656 1600

2-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan LED 3: LED Other Fixture Unit 50W: LED 4: LED Other Fixture Unit 95W: LED 5: Other: LED 6: Other: LED 16: LED A Lamp 11W:

3-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical LED 7: LED Panel 36W: LED 8: LED Other Fixture Unit 46W:

4-Common Space Types:Corridor/Transition LED 9: LED A Lamp 13W: LED 10: LED Other Fixture Unit 46W: LED 11: LED Linear 15W: LED 14: Other:

5-Common Space Types:Restrooms LED 12: LED A Lamp 13W: LED 13: LED Other Fixture Unit 40W:

1 1

20 16 11 30 Total Proposed Watts =

320 330 65899

Name - Title

Signature

Date

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Illuminated length of wall or surface Walkway < 10 feet wide

180 ft 360 ft of

C Allowed Watts / Unit 5 1

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

No Yes

900 360 360 1260 63

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

Illuminated length of wall or surface (180 ft): Non-tradable Wattage LED 1: Other:

640

Walkway < 10 feet wide (360 ft of walkway length): Tradable Wattage LED 2: Other:

1 4 75 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

300 300

Name - Title

Signature

Date

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

Quantity System Type & Description 1

DWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 50 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

LWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 70 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

Name - Title

Signature

Date

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction 20%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Building Area

Designer/Contractor: IN

Floor Area

1-Office : Nonresidential

107846

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1004

---

10.0

0.580

19959

---

0.034

0.108

25166

---

0.030

0.048

455

---

0.039

0.048

43178

---

0.053

0.064

---

0.380

0.450

544

---

0.380

0.450

447

---

0.320

0.450

12825

---

0.330

0.450

404

---

0.320

0.450

204

---

0.430

0.800

80 8613

-----

0.840 0.370

0.500 0.064

365

---

0.061

0.090

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2010 Compliance (90_1Page 1 of 25 2010).cck

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

391

---

0.048

0.064

---

0.360

0.700

Envelope PASSES: Design 0.1% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2010 Compliance (90_1Page 2 of 25 2010).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan 2-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical 3-Common Space Types:Restrooms

C Allowed Watts / ft2

29205 14345 2044

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.98 0.95 0.98

28621 13628 2003

Total Allowed Watts =

44252

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan LED 3: LED Other Fixture Unit 50W: LED 4: LED Other Fixture Unit 95W: LED 5: Other: LED 6: Other: LED 16: LED A Lamp 11W:

1 1 1 1 1

30 36 56 95 12

48 95 120 180 10

1440 3420 6720 17100 120

1 1

22 92

36 45

792 4140

2-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical LED 7: LED Panel 36W: LED 8: LED Other Fixture Unit 46W:

3-Common Space Types:Restrooms LED 12: LED A Lamp 13W: LED 13: LED Other Fixture Unit 40W:

1 1

20 16 11 30 Total Proposed Watts =

320 330 34382

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 22% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2010 Compliance (90_1Page 3 of 25 2010).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction 3 (Other)

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Illuminated length of facade wall or surface Walkway < 10 feet wide

180 ft 360 ft of

C Allowed Watts / Unit 3.75 0.8

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

No Yes

675 288 288 963 750

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 750 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

Illuminated length of facade wall or surface (180 ft): Non-tradable Wattage LED 1: Other:

640

Walkway < 10 feet wide (360 ft of walkway length): Tradable Wattage LED 2: Other:

1 4 75 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

300 300

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 71% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2010 Compliance (90_1Page 4 of 25 2010).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2010 Compliance (90_1Page 5 of 25 2010).cck

Quantity System Type & Description 1

DWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 50 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

LWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 70 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2010 Compliance (90_1Page 6 of 25 2010).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction 20% EnergyPlus 8.1.0.009 (EPW: USA_IN_Indianapolis.Intl.AP.724380_TMY3.epw)

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area: Performance Sim. Specs:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Building Area

Designer/Contractor: IN

Floor Area

1-Office : Nonresidential

107846

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Floor: Slab-On-Grade: Other Floor, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 1: Insulation Enitirely Above Deck: Other Insulation Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 2: Entry Canopy / Roof Elec Room: Other Insulation Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) NORTH Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (N): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (N): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 2: WW-1 (GL 3 4) (N): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.23, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 5: CW 3 (GL 1 2) (Clearwall) (N): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.41, VT 0.62, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (N): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (N): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) EAST Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (E): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (E): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 3: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 1 2) (E): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.38, VT

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

27586 25166

-----

0.060 0.018

0.033 0.032

455

---

0.032

3412

---

0.027

0.108

9367

---

0.030

0.055

327

---

0.310

0.420

164

---

0.320

0.420

---

0.061

0.090

117

---

0.048

0.055

6546

---

0.027

0.108

10120

---

0.030

0.055

308

---

0.300

0.420

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2013 Compliance (90_1Page 1 of 28 2013).cck

Assembly

0.63, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 4: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 3 4 5 6) (E): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.30, VT 0.41, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 5: CW 3 (GL 1 2) (Clearwall) (E): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.41, VT 0.62, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Glazed Entry Doors (E): Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.24, VT 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall 3: CW w/ GL-E7/E8 Spandrel (E): Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 0.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (E): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (E): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) SOUTH Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (S): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (S): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1: WW-1 (GL 1 2) (S): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.35, VT 0.63, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 2: WW-1 (GL 3 4) (S): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.23, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 5: CW 3 (GL 1 2) (Clearwall) (S): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.41, VT 0.62, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Glazed Entry Doors (S): Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.24, VT 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (S): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (S): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) WEST Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (W): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (W): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 3: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 1 2) (W): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.38, VT 0.63, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 4: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 3 4 5 6) (W): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.30, VT 0.41, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Glazed Entry Doors (W): Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.24, VT 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 2: Coiling Door: Other Door, Non-Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Exterior Wall 3: CW w/ GL-E7/E8 Spandrel (W): Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 0.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (W): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

8745

---

0.310

0.420

---

0.320

0.420

---

0.430

0.770

6262

---

0.350

0.051

213

---

0.061

0.090

---

0.048

0.055

3412

---

0.027

0.108

9371

---

0.030

0.055

---

0.310

0.420

218

---

0.310

0.420

164

---

0.320

0.420

---

0.430

0.770

---

0.061

0.090

117

---

0.048

0.055

6589

---

0.027

0.108

14342

---

0.030

0.055

139

---

0.300

0.420

4080

---

0.310

0.420

128

---

0.430

0.770

80 2351

-----

0.102 0.350

0.500 0.051

120

---

0.061

0.090

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2013 Compliance (90_1Page 2 of 28 2013).cck

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (W): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Door 3: Insulated Metal: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Office]

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

---

0.048

0.055

---

0.360

0.500

(a) Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONLY, and are not code requirements. (b) 'Other' components require supporting documentation for proposed U-factors. (c) Fenestration product performance must be certified in accordance with NFRC and requires supporting documentation.

Envelope PASSES: Design 0.1% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2013 Compliance (90_1Page 3 of 28 2013).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan 2-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical 3-Common Space Types:Restrooms

C Allowed Watts / ft2

29205 14345 2044

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.98 0.42 0.98

28621 6025 2003

Total Allowed Watts =

36649

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan LED 3: LED Other Fixture Unit 50W: LED 4: LED Other Fixture Unit 95W: LED 5: Other: LED 6: Other: LED 16: LED A Lamp 11W:

1 1 1 1 1

30 36 56 95 12

48 95 120 180 10

1440 3420 6720 17100 120

1 1

22 92

36 45

792 4140

2-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical LED 7: LED Panel 36W: LED 8: LED Other Fixture Unit 46W:

3-Common Space Types:Restrooms LED 12: LED A Lamp 13W: LED 13: LED Other Fixture Unit 40W:

1 1

20 16 11 30 Total Proposed Watts =

320 330 34382

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 6% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2013 Compliance (90_1Page 4 of 28 2013).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction 3 (Other)

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Illuminated length of facade wall or surface Walkway < 10 feet wide

180 ft 360 ft of

C Allowed Watts / Unit 3.75 0.8

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

No Yes

675 288 288 963 750

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

Illuminated length of facade wall or surface (180 ft): Non-tradable Wattage LED 1: Other:

640

Walkway < 10 feet wide (360 ft of walkway length): Tradable Wattage LED 2: Other:

1 4 75 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

300 300

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 71% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2013 Compliance (90_1Page 5 of 28 2013).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

ACB-01 (Multiple-Zone w/ PerimeterSystem): Heating: 1 each - Hydronic or Steam Coil, Steam, Capacity = 2803 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Hydronic Coil, Capacity = 3981 kBtu/h, No Economizer, Economizer exception: Humidity Requirements No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: ACB01 | Laboratory -- Compliance (Brake HP method) : Fails: ACB01 : Nameplate hp is greater than max nameplate hp Fans: ACB01 Supply, Multi-Zone VAV, 24743 CFM, 80.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (17.6 max. BHP), 72.0 fan efficiency grade MHER01 Exhaust, Multi-Zone VAV, 28454 CFM, 50.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (11.4 max. BHP), 72.0 fan efficiency grade Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 4.8414 credit Return and/or exhaust airflow control devices, 4.8414 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 8.7146 credit

ACB02 (Multiple-Zone w/ PerimeterSystem): Heating: 1 each - Hydronic or Steam Coil, Steam, Capacity = 1577 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Hydronic Coil, Capacity = 2239 kBtu/h, No Economizer, Economizer exception: Humidity Requirements No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: ACB02 | Office Chilled Beam -- Compliance (Brake HP method) : Fails: ACB02 : Nameplate hp is greater than max nameplate hp Fans: ACB02 Supply, Constant Volume, 17390 CFM, 40.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (16.6 max. BHP), 71.0 fan efficiency grade GER01 Exhaust, Constant Volume, 10255 CFM, 15.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (7.0 max. BHP), 65.0 fan efficiency grade Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 2.7233 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 4.9020 credit

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2013 Compliance (90_1Page 6 of 28 2013).cck

Quantity System Type & Description ACB03 Return, Multi-Zone VAV, 9112 CFM, 10.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (0.6 max. BHP), 61.0 fan efficiency grade Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 1.9366 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 3.4858 credit 1

DWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 50 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

LWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 70 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2013 Compliance (90_1Page 7 of 28 2013).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction 20% EnergyPlus 8.1.0.009 (EPW: USA_IN_Indianapolis.Intl.AP.724380_TMY3.epw)

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area: Performance Sim. Specs:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Building Area

Designer/Contractor: IN

Floor Area

1-Office : Nonresidential

107846

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Floor: Slab-On-Grade: Other Floor, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 1: Insulation Enitirely Above Deck: Other Insulation Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 2: Entry Canopy / Roof Elec Room: Other Insulation Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) NORTH Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (N): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (N): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 2: WW-1 (GL 3 4) (N): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.18, VT 0.30, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 5: CW 3 (GL 1 2) (Clearwall) (N): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.41, VT 0.62, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (N): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (N): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) EAST Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (E): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (E): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 3: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 1 2) (E): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.38, VT

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

27586 25166

-----

0.060 0.018

0.033 0.032

455

---

0.032

3412

---

0.027

0.108

9367

---

0.030

0.055

327

---

0.310

0.380

164

---

0.320

0.380

---

0.061

0.090

117

---

0.048

0.055

6546

---

0.027

0.108

10120

---

0.030

0.055

308

---

0.300

0.380

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2016 Compliance (90_1Page 1 of 31 2016).cck

Assembly

0.63, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 4: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 3 4 5 6) (E): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.23, VT 0.26, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 5: CW 3 (GL 1 2) (Clearwall) (E): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.41, VT 0.62, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Glazed Entry Doors (E): Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.24, VT 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall 3: CW w/ GL-E7/E8 Spandrel (E): Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 0.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (E): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (E): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) SOUTH Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (S): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (S): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1: WW-1 (GL 1 2) (S): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.35, VT 0.63, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 2: WW-1 (GL 3 4) (S): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.18, VT 0.30, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 5: CW 3 (GL 1 2) (Clearwall) (S): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.41, VT 0.62, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Glazed Entry Doors (S): Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.24, VT 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (S): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (S): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) WEST Exterior Wall 1: Below-Grade Foundation Walls (W): Other Basement Wall, Normal Density, Furring: None, Wall Ht 20.0, Depth B.G. 20.0, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 2: BR-1 Brick Cladding (W): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 3: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 1 2) (W): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.38, VT 0.63, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Window 4: CW1, CW2, CW4, CW5 (GL 3 4 5 6) (W): Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.23, VT 0.26, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Glazed Entry Doors (W): Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Pending ID, SHGC 0.24, VT 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 2: Coiling Door: Other Door, Non-Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Exterior Wall 3: CW w/ GL-E7/E8 Spandrel (W): Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 0.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall 4: MTL-E1 Formed Metal Coping / Trim (W): Other Mass Wall, Heat capacity 25.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

8745

---

0.310

0.380

---

0.320

0.380

---

0.430

0.680

6262

---

0.350

0.051

213

---

0.061

0.090

---

0.048

0.055

3412

---

0.027

0.108

9371

---

0.030

0.055

---

0.310

0.380

218

---

0.310

0.380

164

---

0.320

0.380

---

0.430

0.680

---

0.061

0.090

117

---

0.048

0.055

6589

---

0.027

0.108

14342

---

0.030

0.055

139

---

0.300

0.380

4080

---

0.310

0.380

128

---

0.430

0.680

80 2351

-----

0.102 0.350

0.310 0.051

120

---

0.061

0.090

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2016 Compliance (90_1Page 2 of 31 2016).cck

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Exterior Wall 5: Rooftop Electrical Room (W): Other Steel Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Door 3: Insulated Metal: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Office]

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

---

0.048

0.055

---

0.360

0.370

Envelope PASSES: Design 0.4% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2016 Compliance (90_1Page 3 of 31 2016).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan 2-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical 3-Common Space Types:Restrooms

C Allowed Watts / ft2

29205 14345 2044

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.81 0.43 0.85

23656 6168 1737

Total Allowed Watts =

31562

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1-Common Space Types:Office - Open Plan LED 3: LED Other Fixture Unit 50W: LED 4: LED Other Fixture Unit 95W: LED 5: Other: LED 6: Other: LED 16: LED A Lamp 11W:

1 1 1 1 1

27 32 50 86 12

48 95 120 180 10

1296 3040 6000 15480 120

1 1

22 92

36 45

792 4140

2-Common Space Types:Electrical/Mechanical LED 7: LED Panel 36W: LED 8: LED Other Fixture Unit 46W:

3-Common Space Types:Restrooms LED 12: LED A Lamp 13W: LED 13: LED Other Fixture Unit 40W:

1 1

20 16 11 30 Total Proposed Watts =

320 330 31518

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 0.1% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2016 Compliance (90_1Page 4 of 31 2016).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building New Construction 3 (Other)

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Illuminated length of facade wall or surface Walkway < 10 feet wide

180 ft 360 ft of

C Allowed Watts / Unit 3.75 0.6

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

No Yes

675 216 216 891 500

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 500 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

Illuminated length of facade wall or surface (180 ft): Non-tradable Wattage LED 1: Other:

640

Walkway < 10 feet wide (360 ft of walkway length): Tradable Wattage LED 2: Other:

1 4 75 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

300 300

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 58% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2016 Compliance (90_1Page 5 of 31 2016).cck

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building West Lafayette, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent: IN

Designer/Contractor: IN

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

ACB-01 (Multiple-Zone w/ PerimeterSystem): Heating: 1 each - Hydronic or Steam Coil, Steam, Capacity = 2803 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Hydronic Coil, Capacity = 3981 kBtu/h, No Economizer, Economizer exception: Humidity Requirements No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: ACB01 | Laboratory -- Compliance (Brake HP method) : Fails: ACB01 : Nameplate hp is greater than max nameplate hp Fans: ACB01 Supply, Multi-Zone VAV, 24743 CFM, 80.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (17.6 max. BHP), 72.0 fan efficiency grade MHER01 Exhaust, Multi-Zone VAV, 28454 CFM, 50.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (11.4 max. BHP), 72.0 fan efficiency grade Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 4.8414 credit Return and/or exhaust airflow control devices, 4.8414 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 8.7146 credit

ACB02 (Multiple-Zone w/ PerimeterSystem): Heating: 1 each - Hydronic or Steam Coil, Steam, Capacity = 1577 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Hydronic Coil, Capacity = 2239 kBtu/h, No Economizer, Economizer exception: Humidity Requirements No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: ACB02 | Office Chilled Beam -- Compliance (Brake HP method) : Fails: ACB02 : Nameplate hp is greater than max nameplate hp Fans: ACB02 Supply, Constant Volume, 17390 CFM, 40.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (16.6 max. BHP), 71.0 fan efficiency grade GER01 Exhaust, Constant Volume, 10255 CFM, 15.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 design brake hp (7.0 max. BHP), 65.0 fan efficiency grade Pressure Drop Credits: Fully ducted return and/or exhaust air systems, 2.7233 credit Particulate filtration credit: MERV 13 through 15, 4.9020 credit

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2016 Compliance (90_1Page 6 of 31 2016).cck

DWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 50 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

LWHB01: Electric Instantaneous Water Heater, Capacity: 70 gallons w/ Circulation Pump No minimum efficiency requirement applies

Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Higher Education Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Falcon - 01 - 2016 Compliance (90_1Page 7 of 31 2016).cck

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1600373 - REV1 Project Falcon ASHRAE 90.1 2007 205 Gates Rd West Lafayette, IN 47906

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: cyoung@pepperconstruction.com (mailto:cyoung@pepperconstruction.com)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Higher Education Energy Code: ASHRAE2007

Building Area (SF): 107,655 Stories: 4 Occupants: 1241

2007 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $129,379

Electricity

Natural Gas

$92,742

$36,637

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$24,923

$42,970

$3,864

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=224

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$36,637

$20,985

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

209,853

927,430

36,637

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

249,229

429,705

38,643

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $6,862,590

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=224

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$75,595

$1,511,902

$80,739

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$1,076,550

$565,189

$3,229,650

Window

Light

Roof

Vinyl Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

Fluorescent NonArchitectural

6" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Conventional Appliances

VAV - 100% OA Central Plant

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

2,643

46,252

$1,982,500

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=224

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1600373 - REV1 Project Falcon ASHRAE 90.1 2010 205 Gates Rd West Lafayette, IN 47906

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: cyoung@pepperconstruction.com (mailto:cyoung@pepperconstruction.com)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Higher Education Energy Code: ASHRAE2010

Building Area (SF): 107,655 Stories: 4 Occupants: 1241

2010 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $97,613

Electricity

Natural Gas

$55,358

$42,255

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$14,323

$21,485

$3,174

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=225

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$42,255

$16,376

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

163,760

553,592

42,255

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

143,235

214,852

31,745

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $7,104,814

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=225

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$75,595

$1,511,902

$80,739

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$1,238,033

$565,189

$3,229,650

Window

Light

Roof

Vinyl Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

LED Non-Architectural

6" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Energy Star Appliances

VAV - 100% OA Central Plant

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

1,577

27,598

$1,182,500

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=225

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1600373 - REV1 Project Falcon ASHRAE 90.1 2013 205 Gates Rd West Lafayette, IN 47906

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: cyoung@pepperconstruction.com (mailto:cyoung@pepperconstruction.com)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Higher Education Energy Code: ASHRAE2013

Building Area (SF): 107,655 Stories: 4 Occupants: 1241

2013 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $93,562

Electricity

Natural Gas

$55,325

$38,237

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$14,323

$21,485

$3,103

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=226

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$38,237

$16,414

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

164,137

553,253

38,237

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

143,235

214,852

31,029

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $7,301,736

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=226

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$131,409

$1,511,902

$201,848

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$1,258,033

$565,189

$3,229,650

Window

Light

Roof

Fiber Glass Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

LED Non-Architectural

12" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Energy Star Appliances

VAV - 100% OA Central Plant

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

1,577

27,598

$1,182,500

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=226

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1600373 - REV1 Project Falcon ASHRAE 90.1 2016 205 Gates Rd West Lafayette, IN 47906

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: (mailto:)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Higher Education Energy Code: ASHRAE2016

Building Area (SF): 107,655 Stories: 4 Occupants: 1241

2016 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $92,062

Electricity

Natural Gas

$55,320

$36,742

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$14,323

$21,485

$3,079

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=227

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$36,742

$16,433

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

164,326

553,205

36,742

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

143,235

214,852

30,792

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $7,301,738

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=227

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$131,411

$1,511,902

$201,848

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$1,258,033

$565,189

$3,229,650

Window

Light

Roof

Fiber Glass Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

LED Non-Architectural

12" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Energy Star Appliances

VAV - 100% OA Central Plant

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

1,577

27,598

$1,182,500

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=227

1/19/2021

APPENDIX C: CASE STUDY B-C BUSINESS – COMMERCIAL This appendix includes the following information: a. b. c. d. e.

Project cost breakdown. Average fiscal impact breakdown. Itemized compliance measures. COMcheck compliance reports. Energy simulation summary reports.

B-C: Final Cost of Work Bid Package 1

Scope Description Temporary Construction

Final Costs (2017) $87,774

Today (2020) $95,913

Concrete

$347,493

$379,715

Masonry

$10,180

$11,124

Structural Steel

$523,346

$571,874

06A

General Trades

$31,831

$34,783

06B

Architectural Millwork

$315,964

$345,262

07A

Waterproofing, Air Barrier

$51,208

$55,956

07B

Roofing

$106,315

$116,173

07C

Metal Panels

$226,050

$247,011

07D

Firestopping

$8,100

$8,851

07E

Joint Sealant

$8,062

$8,810

08A

Doors, Frames & Hardware

$36,380

$39,753

08B

Glass & Glazing

$429,220

$469,020

08C

Overhead Coiling Doors

$7,425

$8,113

09A

Metal Studs, Drywall

$592,635

$647,588

09B

Flooring & Tile

$469,552

$513,092

09C

Painting

$40,232

$43,963

Specialties

$83,226

$90,943

Food Service

$219,984

$240,382

Window Treatments

$4,621

$5,049

Elevators

$76,134

$83,194

Fire Suppression

$52,998

$57,912

Plumbing & Mechanical

$642,394

$701,961

Electrical

$527,973

$576,930

Earthwork

$347,802

$380,053

Site Improvements

$121,804

$133,099

Construction Fence

$9,185

$10,037

$5,377,888

$5,876,563

Total

B-C: Average Fiscal Impact Category

System

Above Grade Wall Construction

$17,753

Below Grade Wall Construction

Roof Construction

Air Distribution

Cooling

Heating

Electrical Power

Lighting

Lighitng Control

$1,463

Service Heating

Cost Impact Percent Cost Impact Total Cost Impact per Square Foot

Cost

$7,667 $0

$26,883 0.36% $2.02

B-C: ASHRAE 90.1 Compliance - Itemized Changes Item No. 0701

0702

1001 1002

1003 1004 1005

Title Description Upgrade the glass for a better U-value but retain roughly theh same visible light transmittance. Upgrade the entryway system to be a highperformane, thermallly-broken product. Upgrade to a thermall-broken curtainwall system. Change the standard fiberglass insulation to an R-21 "dense" type to increase Rvalue. Increase the semi-rigid exterior insulation by 1" to increase R-value. Add an additional inch of roof insulation across the entire roof. Mandatory requirement. [8.4.2] At least 50% of all 125 volt 15- and 20-Amp receptacles are controlled by an automatic control device.

Compliance 90.1-2007

Section Envelope

Type Performance

Cost Impact $13,382.50

90.1-2007

Envelope

Performance

$4,150.00

90.1-2010

Envelope

Performance

$4,150.00 $26,765.00

90.1-2010

Envelope

Performance

$938.40

90.1-2010

Envelope

Performance

$5,520.00

90.1-2010

Envelope

Performance

$20,036.00

90.1-2010

Project Controls

Mandatory

$3,000.00

Assumptions Upgrade all glazing to Viracon VNE1-63 or equivalent.

Upgrade entryway system to "thermal" option. BOD Kawneer 500 changed to 500 T. Total for 2007 step-forward. Upgrade curtainwall to "ultra thermal" option. BOD Kawneer 1600 UT. R-19 fiberglass batt insulation changed to R-21 high-density fiberglass batt insulation or equivalent. Semi-rigid rock wool Insulation increased by 1" (to 3" total) Increase from R-22 to R-30. Polyisocyanurate insulation increased by 1" (to an aveage of 5"), making it a nominal R-30 installation (from R-25). Affects 6 Rooms. Assume 5 receptables per circuit. ln private offices, classrooms, conference rooms, break rooms and individual workstations should have 50% of the receptacles on a automatic shut off. This could be a centralized time of day control for the circuit or it could be an occupancy sensor in the room that shuts them off. Exemptions: receptacles for 24/7 equipment or life safety. Occupancy sensors already included in each space.Cost includes powerpack and labor on 50% of receptacles in spaces noted above. Approximately 120 receptacles total or 60 with auto control device.

1006

Mandatory requirement.

[9.4.1.4] Sidelighted areas equal to or exceeding 250sf shall be separately controlled by at least one multilevel photocontrol (including continuous dimming devices).

90.1-2010

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$1,500.00

It does not appear that any spaces feature multilevel photocontrol (with dimming). Six (6) different spaces meet this criteria and would be subject to this. (Pepper rationale)

1007

Mandatory requirement.

1008

Mandatory requirement.

1009

Mandatory requirement.

1010 1011

Mandatory requirement. Mandatory requirement.

1012

Mandatory requirement.

1301

Mandatory requirement.

1302

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2010

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

Branch circuits sized for maximum drop of 3%. [6.5.3.3] Multiple zone VAV systems with DDC of individual zone boxes have static pressure setpoint reset controls. Should 6.5.3.3 state: Multiple Zone VAV systems with DDC of individual zone boxes have means to automatically reduce OA intake flow based on zone conditions. (see page 52 for 90.1-2010; see page 40 for 90.1-2007) [6.5.3.4] Multiple zone HVAC systems have supply air temperature reset controls.

90.1-2010 90.1-2010

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Wattage Plan Review Mandatory HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

No cost change; a matter specification.

$0.00 $0.00

90.1-2010

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

[9.4.1.1.b] Interior Lighting Controls - Either "restricted to manual ON" or "restricted to partial automatric ON" where no more than 50% of the lighting power for the general lightings shall be allowed to be automatically turned on and none of the remaining lighting shall be automatically turned on. [9.4.1.1.d] Interior Lighting Controls - Bilevel Lighting Control The general lighting in the space shall be controlled so as to provide at least one intermediate step in lighting power or continuous dimming in addition to full ON and full OFF. At least one intermediate step shall be between 30% and 70% (inclusive) of full lighting power.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

No cost change per electrical sub This is a basic component of all VAV systems at this point. It would be hard to spec a system without this. No additional cost. Heapy: RTU1 is the only multizone unit, but all RTUs per schedule have the listed minimum OA CFM requirement which would be based off their specific occupancy category (60.1-2010). As stated this is a basic component of all VAV systems. This is a basic component of all VAV systems at this point. It would be hard to spec a system without this. No additional cost. Temperature reset control is needed. No cost. Standard option for equipment. Total for 2010 step-forward. If you end up having lighting controls or lighting tied into BAS, this should just be a little extra programming or already included.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

90.1-2010

$0.00

$57,759.40 $1,500.00

$1,390.00

No cost. Task lighting is part of the FF&E Package and would have an on/off switch standard with task lighting provided. No cost. Occupancy sensors provided in stairwells. Cost would be 2 stairwells x 2 floors x $200/EA for switch = $800

No cost. Programming of lighting controls included, OS shown for other areas. (Pepper to confirm) Changing the type of switching or potentially adding another zone of lights to allow a 30%, 50% and 70% lighting option between ON and OFF. No additional cost for dimming switch, includes $10 cost premium for dimming cable per light fixture for 50% of total light fixtures not including exit signs or exterior lighting. 277 total x 50% = 139 ea, Note other fixtures have dimming cable as part of 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4]

1303

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

Perimeter daylit rooms covered under 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4]. No additional spaces would apply Heapy: No daylighting controls could be found on drawings. Only occupancy sensors were found, which were used in most areas (i.e. conference spaces, storage, corridors, kitchen, janitor's closet, vestibule, fitness, etc.) There may be potential integral daylighting available through the scheudled fixtures (this is a means to provide daylighting, if separate sensors were not put in place). Only one fixture had a note where dimming was capable (P2). For each space open to windows it would need to be calculated to determine what areas need to be controlled by photocontrols. [Primary sidelighted areas shall be controlled by photocontrols 150W to 299W. Primary and secondary sidelighted areas >=300 W shall be controlled by photocontrols.] The 2nd Floor Fitness area where the P2s are located is an area where the photocontrols are applicable with the internal daylighting within the fixture (this is believed to be the cae). The lounge area also looks to fit the mold of requiring photocontrols, however, the fixtures installed do not specify being able to control the daylighting. Sheets E002,E201 and E203 were referenced. No cost. Included in 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4] and 90.1-2013 [9.4.1.1.e]

1304

Mandatory requirement.

[9.4.1.1.h&i] Interior Lighting Controls - Automatic Full OFF or Scheduled Shutoff for open plan spaces and spaces over 250sf.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

1305

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.3.1.3] Fan have efficiency grade (FEG) >= 67. The total efficiency of the fan at the design point of operation <=15% of maximum total efficiency of the fan.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

Heapy: FEG is calculated by the fan manufacturer (and can also be available in software selections that an engineer can access). The verified data will then determine if the criteria is met. Equipment submittals would be necessary to verify. ECM motors are commonplace now so there may not be an added premium as such. Could vary across manufacturer. This measure is inconclusive based of the information available.

1306

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

1307

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.3.5] Motors for fans >=1/12 hp and <1 hp are electronicallycommutated motors or have a minimum motor efficiency of 70%. These motors are also speed adjustable for either balancing or remote control. [6.5.3.2.2] VAV fans have static pressure sensors positioned so setpoint <=1.2 in. w.c. design pressure.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

1308

Mandatory requirement.

REVISED [6.5.3.2.3] New requirements on provided controls system: Zone damper monitoring or indicator of static pressure need; autodetection, alarm, and operator override of zones excessively triggering reset logic.

90.1-2013

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

1309

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2013

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

The Exhaust Fans per the Fan Schedule are VG (electronically commutated motors) therefore meet this criteria. Per the description, hp range is how a fan system would be selected for this case. The smaller fireplace flue fans are not included within this category. The VAV Terminal Unit Schedule (Electronic Heating Coil) in the Notes section advised that a pressure sensor be furnished. Within the Specification section for Terminal Units (23 36 16) the the advised setpoint criteria can be listed. Downstream of VAV Boxes is considered the Low Pressure Zone area, so meeting the setpoint criteria should not be an issue. Heapy: It is common that buildings will have or has a Building Management System (BMS) where the DDC can tie in to be able to communicate based off the feedback from the sensors and reset based on the zone requiring the most pressure. This building has a BMS and will allow for tie back for the equipment. Specification Section 23 36 16 (pg. 728) and 23 09 13 (pg. 676). Effort and cost to do the programming would be minimum to make sure all required control points are included to adhere to the criteria. This is a conventional practice. Per Specification Section 23 81 00 (pg. 753) the (3) RTUs are packaged with an economizer section. Most designs attempt to take advantage of the free cooling, no mechanical cooling needed, through an economizer section. Design airflow is >3,000 cfm and OA damper is auto modulating. Current design would meet this criteria based off the information provided.

1310

Mandatory requirement.

[6.5.2.4.2] Humidification system dispersion tube hot surfaces in the airstreams of ducts or air-handling units insulated >= R-0.5.

90.1-2013

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

1601

Mandatory requirement.

[5.4.3.3] Loading Dock Weatherseals: Cargo doors and loading dock doors shall be equipped with weatherseals to restrict infiltration when vehicles are parked in the doorway.

90.1-2016

Envelope

Mandatory

$2,890.00 $0.00

Not applicable. This method/system was not a part of the design and would be design specific based off space type, occupancy category, climate zone, or etc. Total for 2013 step-forward. No loading dock and/or equipment in project scope

1602

Mandatory requirement.

[8.4.3a] Monitoring - Measurement device(s) shall be installed to measure total electrical energy.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$20,000.00

1603

Mandatory requirement.

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1605

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1606

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1607

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

No cost. Very similar to criteria in 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4] and 90.1-2013 [9.4.1.1.e]

1608

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

1604

90.1-2016

HVAC: Mandatory ACB-01, 02, 03

$0.00

1609

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

HVAC

$0.00

Heapy: Standard programming for Temperature Controls based within Specification Section 23 09 93 will provide the methodology of how to thermostatically control/operate the various zones allowing energy consumption to be reduced. (pg. 685 - 693). Current design meets requirement based off information provided. Heapy: Not applicable. Chilled water was not a component of this design. The RTUs were DX/Gas Fired Packaged Units. This criteria is job specific.

Mandatory

$20,000.00

Pepper: Add 4 electrical meter bases to project. Heapy: f this standard is followed, you can expect an increased premium, as 5 meters (total eletrical eneergy, HVAC systems, Interior Lighting, Exterior Lighting, and Receptaple circuits) would need to be added to the scope. Since the measaures would be code required you can state that it's a cost that has to be there to meet the measure. A metering specification section would also need to be added to the Electrical Specification group.

Total for 2013 step-forward.

$4,150.00

90.1-2007 Code-Compliance

$57,759.40

90.1-2010 Code-Compliance

$2,890.00

90.1-2013 Code-Compliance

$20,000.00

90.12016 Code-Compliance

$21,199.85

Average cost premium per edition update

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 37%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Office : Nonresidential

14023

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Exterior Wall EW1: Steel Stud Porcelain Tile: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1A: 1600 with Type A Glass: Other Window, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.30, PF 0.29, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Entryway System: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.19, PF 0.53, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 2: HM Door (Uninsulated): Uninsulated Double-Layer Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Door 3L: Overhead Door: Insulated Metal, Non-Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] Exterior Wall EW2: CMU Porcelain Tile: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 8.4, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW3: Steel Stud w/ Metal Shingle Cladding: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW4: Steel Stud w/ Woodgrain Metal Cladding: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Wintow 1B: 1600 with Type B Spandrel: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Floor 1: Slab-on-Grade: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (d) Roof 1: Insulated Roof Deck: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 2: Entry Canopy: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) (a) (b) (c) (d)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

7971

---

0.056

0.064

4500

---

0.610

0.350

192

---

0.870

0.800

---

1.200

0.700

---

0.840

0.500

---

0.115

0.064

1997

---

0.062

0.064

2094

---

0.062

0.064

472

---

0.610

0.064

386

---

0.730

5940 75

-----

0.043 0.064

0.027 0.027

Project Notes

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 00 - Existing.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 15

Envelope FAILS: Design 7% worse than code Project Area: 0.72 acres = 31,363.2 sf Buidling Footprint: 7,486 sf Project area - building footprint = 23,877 sf Site impervious area = 21,780 sf Site pervious area = 2,097

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 00 - Existing.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 15

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category 1-Office

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

14023

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

1.00

14023

Total Allowed Watts =

14023

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1-Office EX: EX: Edgelit Exit Sign: Other: R1 / R1A: R1 / R1A: 4" Aperture Square: LED Panel 33W: R4: R4: Recessed Trough: LED PAR 18W: R2A: R2A: 4" x 12' Linear Recessed: LED Linear 8W: R2: R2: 4" x 2' Linear Recessed: LED Linear 33W: R2B: R2B: 4" x 4' Linear Recessed: LED Linear 8W: P1: P1: Pendant: LED MR 6W: P6: P6: Decorative Pendant: LED Panel 33W: W4: W4: Enclosed & Gasketed Industrial: LED Panel 60W: P3: P3: Industrial Pendant: Other: W1 / W2: W1 / W2: Direct / Indirect Wall Sconce: LED Other Fixture Unit 36W: R5A: R5A: Troffer: LED Panel 33W: R5: R5: Troffer: LED Panel 55W: R5B: R5B: Troffer: LED Panel 40W: R5BE: R5BE: Troffer: LED Panel 40W: R5E: R5E: Troffer: LED Panel 55W: R3: R3: 4" Downlight: LED PAR 13W: R3A: R3A: 4" Downlight: LED PAR 11W: R3B: R3B: 4" Downlight: LED PAR 18W: W3: W3: Linear D / I Sconce: LED Linear 10W: W3A: W3A: Linear D / I Sconce: LED Linear 10W: P2: P2: Highbay: Other:

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 00 - Existing.cck

1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 4 1

21 5 72 32 24 40 8 65 12 30 9 40 4 6 33 30 2 64 6 42 2 32 3 32 7 55 3 40 1 40 2 55 39 13 15 11 16 18 4 80 1 40 21 67 Total Proposed Watts =

105 2304 960 520 360 360 24 990 128 252 64 96 385 120 40 110 507 165 288 320 40 1407 9545

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 15

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 32% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 00 - Existing.cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 15

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Impervious (Parking area(s)) Canopy (Attached canopy) Illuminated Building Area (Illuminated area of wall or surface) Pervious (Plaza area)

21780 ft2 1275 ft2 3056 ft2 2097 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.15 1.25 0.2 0.2

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes No Yes

3267 1594 611 419 5280 5891 295

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 295 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

Impervious ( Parking area(s) 21780 ft2): Tradable Wattage S1: S1: Parking Lot Light (Existin: Metal Halide: Standard: S2: S2: Decorative Pole Top: LED Roadway-Parking Unit 42W: S3: S3: Bollard: LED Other Fixture Unit 25W:

1 1 1

4 2 9

400 40 24

1600 80 216

255

6 3

11 10

66 30

Canopy ( Attached canopy 1275 ft2): Tradable Wattage C1: C1: Surface Mount Downlight: LED PAR 15W:

Illuminated Building Area ( Illuminated area of wall or surface 3056 ft2): Non-tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W: S5: S5: Accent with Linear Spread Lens: LED PAR 10W:

1 1

Pervious ( Plaza area 2097 ft2): Tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W:

1 9 11 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

99 2250

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 60% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 00 - Existing.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 5 of 15

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 00 - Existing.cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 6 of 15

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard Project Talon New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: Indianapolis, IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category 1-Office

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

14023

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

1.00

14023

Total Allowed Watts =

14023

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 4 1

21 5 72 32 24 40 8 65 12 30 9 40 4 6 33 30 2 64 6 42 2 32 3 32 7 55 3 40 1 40 2 55 39 13 15 11 16 18 4 80 1 40 21 67 Total Proposed Watts =

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

105 2304 960 520 360 360 24 990 128 252 64 96 385 120 40 110 507 165 288 320 40 1407 9545

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 8

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard Project Talon New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: Indianapolis, IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Impervious (Parking area(s)) Canopy (Attached canopy) Illuminated Building Area (Illuminated area of wall or surface) Pervious (Plaza area)

21780 ft2 1275 ft2 3056 ft2 2097 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.15 1.25 0.2 0.2

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes No Yes

3267 1594 611 419 5280 5891 295

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 1

4 2 9

400 40 24

1600 80 216

255

6 3

11 10

66 30

Canopy ( Attached canopy 1275 ft2): Tradable Wattage C1: C1: Surface Mount Downlight: LED PAR 15W:

Illuminated Building Area ( Illuminated area of wall or surface 3056 ft2): Non-tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W: S5: S5: Accent with Linear Spread Lens: LED PAR 10W:

1 1

Pervious ( Plaza area 2097 ft2): Tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W:

1 9 11 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

99 2250

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 8

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 37%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Office : Nonresidential

14023

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Exterior Wall EW1: Steel Stud Porcelain Tile: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1A: 1600 with VNE1-63: Other Window, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.23, PF 0.29, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Entryway System 500 T + VNE1-63: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.13, PF 0.53, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 2: HM Door (Uninsulated): Uninsulated Double-Layer Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Door 3L: Overhead Door: Insulated Metal, Non-Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] Exterior Wall EW2: CMU Porcelain Tile: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 8.4, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW3: Steel Stud w/ Metal Shingle Cladding: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW4: Steel Stud w/ Woodgrain Metal Cladding: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Wintow 1B: 1600 with Type B Spandrel: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Floor 1: Slab-on-Grade: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (d) Roof 1: Insulated Roof Deck: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 2: Entry Canopy: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) (a) (b) (c) (d)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

7971

---

0.056

0.064

4500

---

0.380

0.350

192

---

0.520

0.800

---

1.200

0.700

---

0.840

0.500

---

0.115

0.064

1997

---

0.062

0.064

2094

---

0.062

0.064

472

---

0.760

0.064

386

---

0.730

5940 75

-----

0.043 0.064

0.027 0.027

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Env).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 9

Envelope PASSES: Design 0.1% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Env).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 9

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category 1-Office

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

14023

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

1.00

14023

Total Allowed Watts =

14023

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 4 1

21 5 72 32 24 40 8 65 12 30 9 40 4 6 33 30 2 64 6 42 2 32 3 32 7 55 3 40 1 40 2 55 39 13 15 11 16 18 4 80 1 40 21 67 Total Proposed Watts =

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

105 2304 960 520 360 360 24 990 128 252 64 96 385 120 40 110 507 165 288 320 40 1407 9545

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 8

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

Impervious (Parking area(s)) Canopy (Attached canopy) Illuminated Building Area (Illuminated area of wall or surface) Pervious (Plaza area)

21780 ft2 1275 ft2 3056 ft2 2097 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.15 1.25 0.2 0.2

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes No Yes

3267 1594 611 419 5280 5891 295

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 1

4 2 9

400 40 24

1600 80 216

255

6 3

11 10

66 30

Canopy ( Attached canopy 1275 ft2): Tradable Wattage C1: C1: Surface Mount Downlight: LED PAR 15W:

Illuminated Building Area ( Illuminated area of wall or surface 3056 ft2): Non-tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W: S5: S5: Accent with Linear Spread Lens: LED PAR 10W:

1 1

Pervious ( Plaza area 2097 ft2): Tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W:

1 9 11 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

99 2250

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 8

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 01 - 2007 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 37%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Office (Office) : Nonresidential

14023

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Exterior Wall EW1: Steel Stud Porcelain Tile: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1A: 1600 UT with VNE1-63: Other Window, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.23, PF 0.29, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 1: Entryway System 500 T + VNE1-63: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.13, PF 0.53, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 2: HM Door (Uninsulated): Uninsulated Double-Layer Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Door 3L: Overhead Door: Insulated Metal, Non-Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] Exterior Wall EW2: CMU Porcelain Tile: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 8.4, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW3: Steel Stud w/ Metal Shingle Cladding: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW4: Steel Stud w/ Woodgrain Metal Cladding: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Wintow 1B: 1600 with Type B Spandrel: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Floor 1: Slab-on-Grade: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (d) Roof 1: Insulated Roof Deck: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 2: Entry Canopy: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) (a) (b) (c) (d)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

7971

---

0.045

0.064

4500

---

0.320

0.350

192

---

0.520

0.800

---

1.200

0.700

---

0.840

0.500

---

0.084

0.064

1997

---

0.051

0.064

2094

---

0.051

0.064

472

---

0.760

0.064

386

---

0.730

5940 75

-----

0.035 0.063

0.027 0.027

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 02 - 2010 Compliant (Env).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 10

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 02 - 2010 Compliant (Env).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 10

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2010) Standard Project Talon New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: Indianapolis, IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category 1-Office

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

14023

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.90

12621

Total Allowed Watts =

12621

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 4 1

21 5 72 32 24 40 8 65 12 30 9 40 4 6 33 30 2 64 6 42 2 32 3 32 7 55 3 40 1 40 2 55 39 13 15 11 16 18 4 80 1 40 21 67 Total Proposed Watts =

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 02 - 2010 Compliant (Lght).cck

105 2304 960 520 360 360 24 990 128 252 64 96 385 120 40 110 507 165 288 320 40 1407 9545

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 8

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 24% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 02 - 2010 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site: Indianapolis, IN

90.1 (2010) Standard Project Talon New Construction 4 (High activity metropolitan commercial district)

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category Impervious (Parking area) Canopy (Entry canopy) Illuminated Building Area (Illuminated area of facade wall or surface) Pervious (Plaza area)

B Quantity 21780 ft2 1275 ft2 3056 ft2 2097 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit

D Tradable Wattage

0.13 0.4 0.2 0.2

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes No Yes

2831 510 611 419 3761 4372 1300

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 1300 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

Impervious ( Parking area 21780 ft2): Tradable Wattage S1: S1: Parking Lot Light (Existin: Metal Halide: Standard: S2: S2: Decorative Pole Top: LED Roadway-Parking Unit 42W: S3: S3: Bollard: LED Other Fixture Unit 25W:

1 1 1

4 2 9

400 40 24

1600 80 216

255

6 3

11 10

66 30

Canopy ( Entry canopy 1275 ft2): Tradable Wattage C1: C1: Surface Mount Downlight: LED PAR 15W:

Illuminated Building Area ( Illuminated area of facade wall or surface 3056 ft2): Non-tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W: S5: S5: Accent with Linear Spread Lens: LED PAR 10W:

1 1

Pervious ( Plaza area 2097 ft2): Tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W:

1 9 11 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

99 2250

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 56% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 02 - 2010 Compliant (Lght).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 8

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 02 - 2010 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 37% EnergyPlus 8.1.0.009 (EPW: USA_IN_Indianapolis.Intl.AP.724380_TMY3.epw)

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area: Performance Sim. Specs:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Office (Office) : Nonresidential

14023

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Floor 1: Slab-on-Grade: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (d) Roof 1: Insulated Roof Deck: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Roof 2: Entry Canopy: Other Roof, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) NORTH Exterior Wall EW1: Steel Stud Porcelain Tile NORTH: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1A: 1600 UT with VNE1-63 NORTH: Other Window, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.23, PF 0.29, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (c) Door 1: Entryway System 500 T + VNE1-63 NORTH: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.13, PF 0.53, VT 0.23, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall EW4: Steel Stud w/ Woodgrain Metal Cladding NORTH: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Wintow 1B: 1600 with Type B Spandrel NORTH: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) EAST Exterior Wall EW1: Steel Stud Porcelain Tile EAST: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1A: 1600 UT with VNE1-63 EAST: Other Window, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.23, PF 0.29, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (c) Door 1: Entryway System 500 T + VNE1-63 EAST: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.13, PF 0.53, VT 0.23, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall EW4: Steel Stud w/ Woodgrain Metal Cladding EAST: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Wintow 1B: 1600 with Type B Spandrel EAST: Other Exterior Wall,

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

386

---

0.730

0.520

5940 75

-----

0.035 0.063

0.021 0.021

1631

---

0.045

0.051

806

---

0.320

---

0.520

0.770

904

---

0.051

104

---

0.760

0.051

2579

---

0.045

0.051

2531

---

0.320

---

0.520

0.770

313

---

0.051

203

---

0.760

0.051

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 03 - 2013 Compliant (Env).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 11

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) SOUTH Exterior Wall EW1: Steel Stud Porcelain Tile SOUTH: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1A: 1600 UT with VNE1-63 SOUTH: Other Window, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.23, PF 0.29, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (c) Door 1: Entryway System 500 T + VNE1-63 SOUTH: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.13, PF 0.53, VT 0.23, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Door 2: HM Door (Uninsulated) SOUTH: Uninsulated Double-Layer Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Door 3L: Overhead Door SOUTH: Insulated Metal, Non-Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] Exterior Wall EW2: CMU Porcelain Tile SOUTH: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 8.4, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW4: Steel Stud w/ Woodgrain Metal Cladding SOUTH: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Wintow 1B: 1600 with Type B Spandrel SOUTH: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) WEST Exterior Wall EW1: Steel Stud Porcelain Tile WEST: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Window 1A: 1600 UT with VNE1-63 WEST: Other Window, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.23, PF 0.29, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Office] (c) Door 1: Entryway System 500 T + VNE1-63 WEST: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID NA, SHGC 0.13, PF 0.53, VT 0.23, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (c) Exterior Wall EW3: Steel Stud w/ Metal Shingle Cladding WEST: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Exterior Wall EW4: Steel Stud w/ Woodgrain Metal Cladding WEST: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) Wintow 1B: 1600 with Type B Spandrel WEST: Other Exterior Wall, Heat capacity 1.0, [Bldg. Use 1 - Office] (b) (a) (b) (c) (d)

1881

---

0.045

0.051

875

---

0.320

---

0.520

0.770

---

1.200

0.500

---

0.840

0.500

---

0.084

0.051

477

---

0.051

103

---

0.760

0.051

1880

---

0.045

0.051

288

---

0.320

---

0.520

0.770

1997

---

0.051

400

---

0.051

---

0.760

0.051

Envelope PASSES: Design 3% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 03 - 2013 Compliant (Env).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 11

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category 1-Office

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

14023

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.82

11499

Total Allowed Watts =

11499

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 4 1

21 5 72 32 24 40 8 65 12 30 9 40 4 6 33 30 2 64 6 42 2 32 3 32 7 55 3 40 1 40 2 55 39 13 15 11 16 18 4 80 1 40 21 67 Total Proposed Watts =

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 03 - 2013 Compliant (Lght).cck

105 2304 960 520 360 360 24 990 128 252 64 96 385 120 40 110 507 165 288 320 40 1407 9545

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 8

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 17% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 03 - 2013 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site: IN

90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building New Construction 4 (High activity metropolitan commercial district)

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category Impervious (Parking area) Canopy (Entry canopy) Illuminated Building Area (Illuminated area of facade wall or surface) Pervious (Plaza area)

B Quantity 21780 ft2 1275 ft2 3056 ft2 2097 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit

D Tradable Wattage

0.13 0.4 0.2 0.2

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes No Yes

2831 510 611 419 3761 4372 1300

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 1

4 2 9

400 40 24

1600 80 216

255

6 3

11 10

66 30

Canopy ( Entry canopy 1275 ft2): Tradable Wattage C1: C1: Surface Mount Downlight: LED PAR 15W:

Illuminated Building Area ( Illuminated area of facade wall or surface 3056 ft2): Non-tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W: S5: S5: Accent with Linear Spread Lens: LED PAR 10W:

1 1

Pervious ( Plaza area 2097 ft2): Tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W:

1 9 11 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

99 2250

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 56% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 03 - 2013 Compliant (Lght).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 8

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 03 - 2013 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Indianapolis, Indiana 4a New Construction 37% EnergyPlus 8.1.0.009 (EPW: USA_IN_Indianapolis.Intl.AP.724380_TMY3.epw)

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area: Performance Sim. Specs:

Construction Site: IN

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Office (Office) : Nonresidential

14023

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

386

---

0.730

0.520

5940 75

-----

0.035 0.063

0.021 0.021

1631

---

0.045

0.064

806

---

0.320

0.310

---

0.520

0.680

904

---

0.051

0.064

104

---

0.760

0.064

2579

---

0.045

0.064

2531

---

0.320

0.310

---

0.520

0.680

313

---

0.051

0.064

203

---

0.760

0.064

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 04 - 2016 Compliant (Env).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 11

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1881

---

0.045

0.064

875

---

0.320

0.310

---

0.520

0.680

---

1.200

0.370

---

0.840

0.310

---

0.084

0.064

477

---

0.051

0.064

103

---

0.760

0.064

1880

---

0.045

0.064

288

---

0.320

0.310

---

0.520

0.680

1997

---

0.051

0.064

400

---

0.051

0.064

---

0.760

0.064

Envelope PASSES: Design 2% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Commercial Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 04 - 2016 Compliant (Env).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 11

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2016) Standard Project Talon New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site: Indianapolis, IN

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category 1-Office

B Floor Area (ft2)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

14023

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.79

11078

Total Allowed Watts =

11078

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 4 1

21 5 72 32 24 40 8 65 12 30 9 40 4 6 33 30 2 64 6 42 2 32 3 32 7 55 3 40 1 40 2 55 39 13 15 11 16 18 4 80 1 40 21 67 Total Proposed Watts =

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 04 - 2016 Compliant (Lght).cck

105 2304 960 520 360 360 24 990 128 252 64 96 385 120 40 110 507 165 288 320 40 1407 9545

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 8

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 14% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 04 - 2016 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 8

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site: Indianapolis, IN

90.1 (2016) Standard Project Talon New Construction 4 (High activity metropolitan commercial district)

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category Impervious (Parking area) Canopy (Entry canopy) Illuminated Building Area (Illuminated area of facade wall or surface) Pervious (Plaza area)

B Quantity 21780 ft2 1275 ft2 3056 ft2 2097 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit

D Tradable Wattage

0.08 0.4 0.2 0.14

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes No Yes

1742 510 611 294 2546 3157 900

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 900 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 1

4 2 9

400 40 24

1600 80 216

255

6 3

11 10

66 30

Canopy ( Entry canopy 1275 ft2): Tradable Wattage C1: C1: Surface Mount Downlight: LED PAR 15W:

Illuminated Building Area ( Illuminated area of facade wall or surface 3056 ft2): Non-tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W: S5: S5: Accent with Linear Spread Lens: LED PAR 10W:

1 1

Pervious ( Plaza area 2097 ft2): Tradable Wattage S4: S4: Landscape Accent: LED PAR 11W:

1 9 11 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

99 2250

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 35% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 04 - 2016 Compliant (Lght).cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 8

Name - Title

Signature

Project Title: Project Talon Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Talon - 04 - 2016 Compliant (Lght).cck

Date

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 8

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1601867 - REV1 Project Talon ASHRAE 90.1 2007 550 E. 96th Street Carmel, IN 46280

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: cyoung@pepperconstruction.com (mailto:cyoung@pepperconstruction.com)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Commercial Office Energy Code: ASHRAE2007

Building Area (SF): 14,023 Stories: 2 Occupants: 350

2007 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $25,872

Electricity

Natural Gas

$17,934

$7,938

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$3,060

$9,329

$869

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=220

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$7,938

$4,676

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

46,761

179,334

7,938

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

30,598

93,288

8,687

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $990,587

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=220

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$19,292

$385,836

$21,033

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$140,230

$73,621

$308,506

Window

Light

Roof

Vinyl Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

Fluorescent NonArchitectural

6" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Conventional Appliances

VAV - Return Air Package (Roof Top Units)

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

510

8,925

$382,500

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=220

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1601867 - REV1 Project Talon ASHRAE 90.1 2010 550 E. 96th Street Carmel, IN 46280

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: cyoung@pepperconstruction.com (mailto:cyoung@pepperconstruction.com)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Commercial Office Energy Code: ASHRAE2010

Building Area (SF): 14,023 Stories: 2 Occupants: 350

2010 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $19,499

Electricity

Natural Gas

$11,197

$8,302

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$1,866

$4,664

$754

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=221

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$8,302

$3,913

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

39,127

111,971

8,302

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

18,658

46,644

7,542

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $1,039,886

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=221

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$33,536

$385,836

$52,583

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$133,219

$73,621

$308,506

Window

Light

Roof

Fiber Glass Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

LED Non-Architectural

9" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Energy Star Appliances

VAV - Return Air Package (Roof Top Units)

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

320

5,600

$240,000

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=221

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1601867 - REV1 Project Talon ASHRAE 90.1 2013 550 E. 96th Street Carmel, IN 46280

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: cyoung@pepperconstruction.com (mailto:cyoung@pepperconstruction.com)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Commercial Office Energy Code: ASHRAE2013

Building Area (SF): 14,023 Stories: 2 Occupants: 350

2013 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $19,720

Electricity

Natural Gas

$11,198

$8,522

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$1,866

$4,664

$757

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=222

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$8,522

$3,911

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

39,106

111,976

8,522

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

18,658

46,644

7,568

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $1,087,932

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=222

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$33,536

$385,836

$52,583

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$181,265

$73,621

$308,506

Window

Light

Roof

Fiber Glass Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

LED Non-Architectural

9" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Energy Star Appliances

VAV - Return Air Package (Roof Top Units)

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

320

5,600

$240,000

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=222

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 1 of 7

1601867 - REV1 Project Talon ASHRAE 90.1 2016 550 E. 96th Street Carmel, IN 46280

Client: Phone: (tel:) Email: (mailto:)

Climate Zone: 5 Building Type: Commercial Office Energy Code: ASHRAE2016

Building Area (SF): 14,023 Stories: 2 Occupants: 350

2016 BASE - (1/19/2021) Annual Energy Cost Total $19,335

Electricity

Natural Gas

$11,196

$8,139

Lights

Plugs

Fans

$1,866

$4,664

$752

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=223

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Heating

Cooling

$8,139

$3,914

Page 2 of 7

Energy Consumption Cooling [kWh]

Electricity [kWh]

Natural Gas [therms]

39,144

111,970

8,139

Lights [kWh]

Plugs [kWh]

Fans [kWh]

18,658

46,644

7,524

Wall

Roof

Construction Cost Total Cost $1,087,932

Window

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=223

1/19/2021

Pepper High Performance Tools | View

Page 3 of 7

$33,536

$385,836

$52,583

Light/Plug

Floor

HVAC

$181,265

$73,621

$308,506

Window

Light

Roof

Fiber Glass Double Pane Insulated & Low-E

LED Non-Architectural

9" Batt

Wall

Equipment

Hvac

Glazing with Spandrel

Energy Star Appliances

VAV - Return Air Package (Roof Top Units)

Solar Panel

Solar SF

Solar Cost

320

5,600

$240,000

Equipment

Code Components

Solar

https://www.pepperhighperformance.com/Reports/ClientROI?projId=223

1/19/2021

APPENDIX D: CASE STUDY R-M RESIDENTIAL – MULTIFAMILY This appendix includes the following information: a. b. c. d. e.

Project cost breakdown. Average fiscal impact breakdown. Itemized compliance measures. COMcheck compliance reports. Energy simulation summary reports.

R-M: Final Cost of Work Bid Package 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 02A 02B 02C 03 04 05 06A 06B 07A 07B 07C 07D 07E 08C 08D 08E 09A 09B 09C 09D 09E 10A 12A 12B 12C 14 14B 21 22 23 26 32A 32C 33

Bid Package Scope Description Temporary Construction Guardrail Maint. Temporary Heating/Cooling Temporary Stone Access Final Cleaning Field Engineering Exterior Consultant Building Demolition Sitework, Site Utilities Termite Control Concrete Superstructure Masonry Structural Steel General Trades 06B Architectural Millwork Waterproofing, Air Barrier Metal Panels Roofing Firestopping Fireproofing Curtainwall Storefront Overhead Coiling Doors Metal Studs, Drywall Hard Tile Resilient Flooring Painting Perimeter Metal Stud & Sheathing Interior and Exterior Signage Window Treatments Office Glass Partitions Laboratory Casework Elevators Bridge Cranes Fire Suppression Plumbing Mechanical Electrical Site Concrete Asphalt Pavement Construction Fence Total Spend

Final Costs (year built)

Today (2020)

Cost data witheld by development team. Advised unitary project cost of $185.00/sf assumed.

$34,034,450

B-H: Average Fiscal Impact

B-C: Average Fiscal Impact

Category

System

Above Grade Wall Construction

$100,476

Below Grade Wall Construction

$49,067

Roof Construction

$71,873

Air Distribution

$27,333

Cooling

$750

Heating

$750

Electrical Power

$4,668

Lighting

-$3,133

Lighitng Control

$9,430

Service Heating

Cost Impact

Cost

Category

$261,213

Percent Cost Impact

0.51%

Total Cost Impact per Square Foot

$2.74

Average Fiscal Impact (All Case Studies) Category

System

Above Grade Wall Construction

$118,229

Below Grade Wall Construction

$49,067

Roof Construction

$71,873

Air Distribution

$38,667

Cooling

$7,150

Heating

$7,150

Electrical Power

$43,850

Lighting

$28,200

Lighitng Control

$31,560

Service Heating

$4,167

Cost Impact

Cost

$133,304

Percent Cost Impact Total Cost Impact per Square Foot

0.39% $1.83

C: Average Fiscal Impact System

R-M: Average Fiscal Impact Cost

Category

Above Grade Wall Construction

$17,753

Below Grade Wall Construction

Roof Construction

Air Distribution

Cooling

Heating

$7,667

Electrical Power Lighting Lighitng Control

$1,463

Service Heating

Cost Impact Percent Cost Impact Total Cost Impact per Square Foot

$26,883 0.36% $2.02

M: Average Fiscal Impact System

Cost

Above Grade Wall Construction

Below Grade Wall Construction

Roof Construction

Air Distribution

$11,333

Cooling

$6,400

Heating

$6,400

Electrical Power

$31,515

Lighting

$31,333

Lighitng Control

$20,667

Service Heating

$4,167

Cost Impact Percent Cost Impact Total Cost Impact per Square Foot

$111,815 0.30% $0.74

R-M: ASHRAE 90.1 Compliance - Itemized Changes Item No. 0701

Title [Step-back] No air barrier.

0702

1001 1002

Description [5.4.3.1] Continuous Air Barrier The entire building envelope shall be designed and constructed with a continuous air barrier. Would need water barrier, but measures to accomplish a continuous air barrier are not required. Would result in less air-tight construction.

Compliance 90.1-2007

Section Envelope

Type Performance

Cost Impact $73,588.00

[Step-back] 100% Outside Air Rooftop Unit: OAU-1 Step back from EER 14.2 to EER 11.0.

90.1-2007

Mechanical

Performance

$0.00

OAU 1 (outside air unit) requires an economizer. Branch circuits sized for maximum drop of 3%. Automatic shut off of Lighting is required in all non-dwelling spaces.

Assumed to be an air economizer in this instance.

90.1-2010

Systems

Performance

$73,588.00 $9,000.00

Branch circuits sized for maximum drop of 3%.

Assumptions Tyvek type product - assumed $40/sf to account for labor and material associated with ensuring continous air barrier.

No cost impact. EER 14 or better is assumed standard for most unit purchases today. Total for 2007 step-back. RTU would require an economizer per 90.1-2010.

90.1-2010

Plan Review

Mandatory

$0.00

17 spaces on first floor plan - area A; 2 spaces on first floor plan area C; 5 on second floor; 5 on third; 5 on fourth. Total = 34 spaces. Automatic controls for fans on OAU 1 + AH [6.4.3.4.4] Ventilation fans >0.75 hp have automatic controls to 1-1, 1-2-, 1-3 (4 total). shut off fan when not required. OAU 1 supply air temperature reset [6.5.3.4] Multiple zone HVAC systems have supply air controls. temperature reset controls. Approved field testing. [6.5.7.1.5] Approved field test used to evaluate design air flow rates and demonstrate proper capture and containment of kitchen exhaust systems. WHE-1, WHE-2, WHE-3 outlet piping [7.4.3] First 8 feet of outlet piping is insulated. insulation. WHE-1, WHE-2, WHE-3 heat traps. [7.4.6] Heat traps installed on non-circulating storage water tanks.

90.1-2010

Controls Mandatory Interior Lighting

$6,800.00

90.1-2010

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

No cost impact. Assumed standard with most unit purchases today.

90.1-2010

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

No cost impact. Basic component of RTU and other unitary systems today.

90.1-2010

HVAC

Mandatory

$20,000.00

90.1-2010

Mechanical

Mandatory

$5,000.00

90.1-2010

Mechanical

Mandatory

$3,000.00

1009

Certain receptacles on automatic control devices.

[8.4.2] At least 50% of all 125 volt 15- and 20-Amp receptacles are controlled by an automatic control device.

90.1-2010

Controls

Mandatory

$94,546.00

1010

Lighting controls.

[9.4.1.6] Additional lighting controls: Stairwell lighting - one more control devices to automatically reduce lighting power in any one controlled zone by at least 50% withing 30 minutes of all occupants leaving the room.

90.1-2010

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$3,200.00

1301

Door switches.

90.1-2013

HVAC

1302

Interior lighting controls.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

1303

Interior lighting controls.

Doors separating conditioned spaces from the outdoors must have door switches to disable the mechanical heating/cooling or reset their setpoints within five minutes of opening the door. [9.4.1.1.b] Interior Lighting Controls - Either "restricted to manual ON" or "restricted to partial automatric ON" where no more than 50% of the lighting power for the general lighting shall be allowed to be automatically turned on and none of the remaining lighting shall be automatically turned on. [9.4.1.1.d] Interior Lighting Controls - Bilevel Lighting Control

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$6,000.00

1003

1004 1005 1006

1007 1008

Mandatory

$141,546.00 $38,400.00

No cost impact. 34 spaces x $200/EA for switch = $6,800.

Additional service required as part of mechanical installation.

Miscellaneous item to be designed / coordinated / and installed. Estimate assumed. 3 heat traps x assumed $1,000/EA for installed cost. An anverage cost of $41/EA was established on another cost study as part of this project. Average applied here to 188 units x 12 receptacles apiece + 50 additional receptacles. Cost would be 4 stairwells x 4 floors x $200/EA for switch = $3,200.

Total for 2010 step-forward. Assumed averaged installed costs across all 188 units and 4 stairwells of $200/EA. Other conditioned spaces are separated by entryway systems / vestibules. No cost impact. Applicable spaces have occupancy sensors.

Changing the type of switching or potentially adding another zone of lights to allow a 30%, 50% and 70% lighting option between ON and OFF. No additional cost for dimming switch, includes $10 cost premium for dimming cable per light fixture for 50% of total light fixtures not including exit signs or exterior lighting. Assuming average 3 per unit along with various support spaces = 600 total x $10/EA. Note other fixtures have dimming cable as part of 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4]

1304

Mandatory requirement.

1305

Fan efficiency.

1306

Fan motors.

1307

Humidification requirement.

[9.4.1.1.e] Interior Lighting Controls - Automatic Daylight Responsive Controls for Sidelighting: In any space where the combined input power of all general lighting is 150 W or greater, the general lighting in the primary sidelighted areas shall be controlled by photocontrols. In any space where the combined general lighting is 300 W or greater, the general lighting in the primary sidelighted areas and secondary sidelighted areas shall be conrolled by photocontrols. The control system shall allow for continuous dimming. [6.5.3.1.3] Fan have efficiency grade (FEG) >= 67. The total efficiency of the fan at the design point of operation <=15% of maximum total efficiency of the fan. [6.5.3.5] Motors for fans >=1/12 hp and <1 hp are electronicallycommutated motors or have a minimum motor efficiency of 70%. These motors are also speed adjustable for either balancing or remote control. [6.5.2.4.2] Humidification system dispersion tube hot surfaces in the airstreams of ducts or air-handling units insulated >= R-0.5.

90.1-2013

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$46,000.00

Perimeter rooms covered under 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4]. Assume areas with 4+ fixtures to be over 150W. Add approximately 200 spaces (188 units + other applicable spaces) x ($150 sensor + $30 low voltage cable from sensor to power pack + ($10 dimming cable premium x 5 fixtures/room)). LED lighting comes with 0-10V dimming standard.

90.1-2013

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

No cost impact. Assumed to be standard.

90.1-2013

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

No cost impact. Assumed to be standard.

90.1-2013

HVAC

Mandatory

$4,500.00

1601

Mandatory requirement.

[8.4.3a] Monitoring - Measurement device(s) shall be installed to measure total electrical energy.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$94,900.00 $94,000.00

1602

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

1603

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1604

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1605

Mandatory requirement.

90.1-2016

Controls

Mandatory

$0.00

Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

1606

Mandatory requirement.

[8.4.3b] Monitoring - Measurement device(s) shall be installed to measure HVAC systems. [8.4.3c] Monitoring - Measurement device(s) shall be installed to measure interior lighting. [8.4.3d] Monitoring - Measurement device(s) shall be installed to measure exterior lighting. [8.4.3e] Monitoring - Measurement device(s) shall be installed to measure receptacle circuits. [9.4.1.1.e] Interior Lighting Controls - Automatic Daylight Responsive Controls for Sidelighting: In any space where the combined input power of all general lighting is 150 W or greater, the general lighting in the primary sidelighted areas shall be controlled by photocontrols. The control system shall allow for continuous dimming. [6.4.3.4.2, 6.4.3.4.3] Outdoor air and exhaust systems have motorized dampers that automatically shut when not in use and meet maximum leakage rates. [6.5.2.1] Zone controls can limit reheating, recooling, simultaneous heating and cooling and sequence heating and cooling to each zone. [6.5.4.7] Chilled-water cooling coils provide a 15*F or higher temperature difference between leaving and entering water temperatures and a minimum 57*F leaving water temperatures at design conditions. Dwelling Unit Lighting: Apartments, condos, living space must have at least 75% of permanently installed fixtures with minimum lamp efficacy of 55 lumens/Watt. Likely requires LED to comply.

Many modern humidifiers have this. Small cost impact. One humidifer in the "OAU 1" DOAS. Total for 2013 step-forward. Need to monitor total electric and electric consumption of each of the following: HVAC, interior lighting, exterior lighting and receptacle circuits. So if designed and single line done, could be 5 electric meters at a minimum. Tenants, those need to be metered separately too. Assuming an average of $500/unit. Covered under 90.1-2016 [8.4.3a]

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting - Mandatory Controls

$0.00

No cost. Very similar to criteria in 90.1-2010 [9.4.1.4] and 90.1-2013 [9.4.1.1.e]

90.1-2016

HVAC

Mandatory

$5,000.00

90.1-2016

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

No cost impact. Matter of design and specification.

90.1-2016

HVAC

Mandatory

$0.00

No cost impact. Assumed to be standard.

90.1-2016

Interior Lighting Mandatory

$0.00

No cost impact. All LED package.

1607

1608

Mandatory requirement.

1609

Mandatory requirement.

1610

Lighting: Lamp Efficacy

Small cost impact on "OAU 1" DOAS.

$99,000.00

Total for 2013 step-forward.

$73,588.00

90.1-2007 Code-Compliance

$141,546.00

90.1-2010 Code-Compliance

$94,900.00

90.1-2013 Code-Compliance

$99,000.00

90.12016 Code-Compliance

$102,258.50

Average cost premium per edition update

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 24%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily) : Residential

183970

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Floor 1: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (d) NORTH Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) NORTH Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Insulated Metal Door: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) EAST Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) EAST Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Storefront Window copy 1: Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1570 316

-----

0.730 0.054

0.540 0.051

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

14312

---

0.054

0.051

2316

---

0.300

0.350

572

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.370

0.500

836

---

0.300

0.800

2109

---

0.054

0.051

381

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

20103

---

0.054

0.051

3179

---

0.300

0.350

233

---

0.300

0.450

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 1 of 25

Assembly

Insulated Metal Door copy 1: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 1: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Insulated Metal Door copy 2: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) WEST Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Storefront Window copy 3: Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) WEST Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Roof 1: Insulation Entirely Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (a) (b) (c) (d)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

---

0.370

0.500

1756

---

0.300

0.800

2974

---

0.054

0.051

320

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.370

0.500

115

---

0.300

0.800

11640

---

0.054

0.051

983

---

0.300

0.350

356

---

0.300

0.350

751

---

0.300

0.800

2384

---

0.054

0.051

292

---

0.300

0.350

270

---

0.300

0.450

140

---

0.300

0.800

19829

---

0.054

0.051

3455

---

0.300

0.350

1733

---

0.300

0.800

56236

---

20.0

0.048

Envelope PASSES: Design 2% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 2 of 25

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 3 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

183970

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.70

128779

Total Allowed Watts =

128779

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily) LED 1: B1: CORRIDOR: Other: LED 2: C9: CLOSET: Other: LED 3: B15: STAIRWELL: Other: LED 4: C1: GENERAL: Other: LED 5: B16: ELEVATOR PIT: Other: LED 6: B10: LEASING: Other: LED 7: B10.1: LEASING: Other: LED 8: B10.2: LEASING: Other: LED 9: C4: VANITY: Other:

1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2

266 15 17 15 32 54 34 45 4 32 2 10 3 8 2 19 2 25 Total Proposed Watts =

3990 255 1728 1530 128 20 24 38 50 7763

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 94% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 4 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

SITE LIGHTING (Parking area(s)) POOL (Special feature area)

190000 ft2 8200 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.15 0.2

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes

28500 1640 30140 30140 1507

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 1507 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

SITE LIGHTING ( Parking area(s) 190000 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 1: S5: SITE POLE: Other: LED 2: B6: SITE WALL PACK: Other:

1 1

12 11

150 80

1800 880

POOL ( Special feature area 8200 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 3: S10: POOL BOLLARD: Other: LED 4: S11: POOL TREE LIGHT: Other:

1 19 25 1 6 7 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

475 42 3197

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 90% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 5 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site:

90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

OAU 1 (outside air unit) (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Gas, Capacity = 100 kBtu/h Proposed Efficiency = 80.00% Et, Required Efficiency: 80.00 % Et (or 78% AFUE) Cooling: 1 each - Single Package DX Unit, Capacity = 66 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 14.20 EER, Required Efficiency: 11.00 EER Fan System: OAU FAN -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 3 Supply, Constant Volume, 1000 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp

AH 1A (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Electric, Capacity = 19 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Split System, Capacity = 17 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 13.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 600 CFM, 1/3 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 600 CFM, 0.3 motor nameplate hp

AH 1B (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Electric, Capacity = 19 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Split System, Capacity = 17 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 13.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 600 CFM, 1/3 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 600 CFM, 0.3 motor nameplate hp

AH SA (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Electric, Capacity = 19 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Split System, Capacity = 17 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 13.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 600 CFM, 1/3 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 600 CFM, 0.3 motor nameplate hp

AH SB (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Electric, Capacity = 19 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Split System, Capacity = 19 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 6 of 25

Quantity System Type & Description Proposed Efficiency = 13.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 600 CFM, 1/3 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 600 CFM, 0.3 motor nameplate hp 1

AH 2A (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Electric, Capacity = 26 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Split System, Capacity = 22 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 13.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 600 CFM, 1/3 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 600 CFM, 0.3 motor nameplate hp

AH 2B (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Electric, Capacity = 26 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Split System, Capacity = 22 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 13.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 600 CFM, 1/3 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 600 CFM, 0.3 motor nameplate hp

AH 2C (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Electric, Capacity = 26 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Cooling: 1 each - Split System, Capacity = 22 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 13.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 600 CFM, 1/3 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 600 CFM, 0.3 motor nameplate hp

AH 1-1 (Single Zone): Single Package Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 48 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 46 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 1600 CFM, 1 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp

AH 1-2 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 48 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 46 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 1600 CFM, 1 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp

AH 1-3 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 48 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 46 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: 1600 CFM, 1 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 7 of 25

Quantity System Type & Description Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp 1

MSAH 1-1 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 33 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 30 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-2 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 37 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 36 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-3 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 18 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 12 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-4 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 18 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 12 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-5 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 18 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 12 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 4-1 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 11 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 9 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 30.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 4-2 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 11 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 9 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 30.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 4-3 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 11 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 7.70 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 9 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 30.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 13.00 SEER Fan System: None

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 8 of 25

Quantity System Type & Description 1

WHE-1: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 38 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 EF, Required Efficiency: 0.88 EF

WHE-2: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 47 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 EF, Required Efficiency: 0.87 EF

WHE-3: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 28 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 EF, Required Efficiency: 0.89 EF

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Report date: 01/18/21 Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 00 - Existing.cck Page 9 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 24%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily) : Residential

183970

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1570 316

-----

0.730 0.054

0.540 0.051

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

14312

---

0.054

0.051

2316

---

0.300

0.350

572

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.370

0.500

836

---

0.300

0.800

2109

---

0.054

0.051

381

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

20103

---

0.054

0.051

3179

---

0.300

0.350

233

---

0.300

0.450

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 25

Assembly

Insulated Metal Door copy 1: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 1: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Insulated Metal Door copy 2: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) WEST Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Storefront Window copy 3: Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) WEST Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Roof 1: Insulation Entirely Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (a) (b) (c) (d)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

---

0.370

0.500

1756

---

0.300

0.800

2974

---

0.054

0.051

320

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.370

0.500

115

---

0.300

0.800

11640

---

0.054

0.051

983

---

0.300

0.350

356

---

0.300

0.350

751

---

0.300

0.800

2384

---

0.054

0.051

292

---

0.300

0.350

270

---

0.300

0.450

140

---

0.300

0.800

19829

---

0.054

0.051

3455

---

0.300

0.350

1733

---

0.300

0.800

56236

---

20.0

0.048

Envelope PASSES: Design 2% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2007) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 25

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

183970

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.70

128779

Total Allowed Watts =

128779

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2

266 15 17 15 32 54 34 45 4 32 2 10 3 8 2 19 2 25 Total Proposed Watts =

3990 255 1728 1530 128 20 24 38 50 7763

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

SITE LIGHTING (Parking area(s)) POOL (Special feature area)

190000 ft2 8200 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.15 0.2

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes

28500 1640 30140 30140 1507

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

SITE LIGHTING ( Parking area(s) 190000 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 1: S5: SITE POLE: Other: LED 2: B6: SITE WALL PACK: Other:

1 1

12 11

150 80

1800 880

POOL ( Special feature area 8200 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 3: S10: POOL BOLLARD: Other: LED 4: S11: POOL TREE LIGHT: Other:

1 19 25 1 6 7 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

475 42 3197

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 5 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site:

90.1 (2007) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

OAU 1 (outside air unit) (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Gas, Capacity = 100 kBtu/h Proposed Efficiency = 80.00% Et, Required Efficiency: 80.00 % Et (or 78% AFUE) Cooling: 1 each - Single Package DX Unit, Capacity = 66 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser Proposed Efficiency = 11.00 EER, Required Efficiency: 11.00 EER Fan System: OAU FAN -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 3 Supply, Constant Volume, 1000 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 6 of 25

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 7 of 25

Quantity System Type & Description Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp 1

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 8 of 25

Quantity System Type & Description 1

WHE-1: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 38 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 EF, Required Efficiency: 0.88 EF

WHE-2: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 47 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 EF, Required Efficiency: 0.87 EF

WHE-3: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 28 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 EF, Required Efficiency: 0.89 EF

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 01 - 2007.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 9 of 25

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 24%

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily) : Residential

183970

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1570 316

-----

0.730 0.054

0.540 0.051

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

14312

---

0.054

0.051

2316

---

0.300

0.350

572

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.370

0.500

836

---

0.300

0.800

2109

---

0.054

0.051

381

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

20103

---

0.054

0.051

3179

---

0.300

0.350

233

---

0.300

0.450

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 31

Assembly

Insulated Metal Door copy 1: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 1: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Insulated Metal Door copy 2: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) WEST Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Storefront Window copy 3: Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) WEST Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Checked, SHGC 0.40, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID 0000, SHGC 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Roof 1: Insulation Entirely Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (a) (b) (c) (d)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

---

0.370

0.500

1756

---

0.300

0.800

2974

---

0.054

0.051

320

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.300

0.350

---

0.370

0.500

115

---

0.300

0.800

11640

---

0.054

0.051

983

---

0.300

0.350

356

---

0.300

0.350

751

---

0.300

0.800

2384

---

0.054

0.051

292

---

0.300

0.350

270

---

0.300

0.450

140

---

0.300

0.800

19829

---

0.054

0.051

3455

---

0.300

0.350

1733

---

0.300

0.800

56236

---

20.0

0.048

Envelope PASSES: Design 3% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 31

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

183970

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.60

110382

Total Allowed Watts =

110382

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2

266 15 17 15 32 54 34 45 4 32 2 10 3 8 2 19 2 25 Total Proposed Watts =

3990 255 1728 1530 128 20 24 38 50 7763

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 93% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site:

90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction 2 (Residential mixed use area)

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

SITE LIGHTING (Parking area) POOL (Special feature area)

190000 ft2 8200 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.06 0.14

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes

11400 1148 12548 12548 600

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 600 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

SITE LIGHTING ( Parking area 190000 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 1: S5: SITE POLE: Other: LED 2: B6: SITE WALL PACK: Other:

1 1

12 11

150 80

1800 880

POOL ( Special feature area 8200 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 3: S10: POOL BOLLARD: Other: LED 4: S11: POOL TREE LIGHT: Other:

1 19 25 1 6 7 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

475 42 3197

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 76% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 5 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site:

90.1 (2010) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

OAU 1 (outside air unit) (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Gas, Capacity = 100 kBtu/h Proposed Efficiency = 80.00% Et, Required Efficiency: 80.00 % Et (or 78% AFUE) Cooling: 1 each - Single Package DX Unit, Capacity = 66 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser, Air Economizer Proposed Efficiency = 14.20 EER, Required Efficiency: 11.00 EER Fan System: OAU FAN -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 3 Supply, Constant Volume, 1000 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 6 of 31

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 7 of 31

Quantity System Type & Description Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp 1

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 8 of 31

Quantity System Type & Description 1

WHE-1: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 38 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, Btu/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 235.75 SL, Btu/h (if > 12 kW)

WHE-2: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 47 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, Btu/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 259.95 SL, Btu/h (if > 12 kW)

WHE-3: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 28 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, Btu/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 205.20 SL, Btu/h (if > 12 kW)

Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2010) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2010.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 9 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction 24% EnergyPlus 8.1.0.009 (EPW: USA_IN_Indianapolis.Intl.AP.724380_TMY3.epw)

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area: Performance Sim. Specs:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily) : Residential

183970

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Floor 1: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (d) Roof 1: Insulation Entirely Above Deck, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] NORTH NORTH Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) NORTH Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Insulated Metal Door: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) EAST EAST Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 -

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1570 56236

-----

--20.0

0.730 0.048

0.510 0.032

316

---

0.054

0.051

---

0.300

0.320

---

0.300

0.320

14312

---

0.054

0.051

2316

---

0.300

0.320

572

---

0.300

0.320

---

0.370

0.500

836

---

0.330

0.680

2109

---

0.054

0.051

381

---

0.300

0.320

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 31

Assembly

Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) EAST Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Storefront Window copy 1: Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Insulated Metal Door copy 1: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 1: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH SOUTH Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Insulated Metal Door copy 2: Insulated Metal, Swinging, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) SOUTH Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window - OPERABLE: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Fiberglass Window - FIXED: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 2: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) WEST WEST Exterior Wall BRICK: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (b) Fiberglass Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 Multifamily Area] (c) Storefront Window copy 3: Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) WEST Exterior Wall FIBER CEMENT PANEL: Other Wood Framed Wall, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (b) Window copy 3: Vinyl/Fiberglass Frame, Perf. Specs.: Product ID VT based on Andersen, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.47, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c)

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

---

0.300

0.320

20103

---

0.054

0.051

3179

---

0.300

0.320

233

---

0.300

0.420

---

0.370

0.500

1756

---

0.330

0.680

2974

---

0.054

0.051

320

---

0.300

0.320

---

0.300

0.320

---

0.370

0.500

115

---

0.330

0.680

11640

---

0.054

0.051

983

---

0.300

0.320

356

---

0.300

0.320

751

---

0.330

0.680

2384

---

0.054

0.051

292

---

0.300

0.320

270

---

0.300

0.420

140

---

0.330

0.680

19829

---

0.054

0.051

3455

---

0.300

0.320

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 31

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) (a) (b) (c) (d)

1733

---

Proposed U-Factor

Cont. R-Value ---

0.330

Budget UFactor(a) 0.680

Envelope PASSES: Design 1% better than code Envelope Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed envelope systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

183970

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.51

93825

Total Allowed Watts =

93825

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2

266 15 17 15 32 54 34 45 4 32 2 10 3 8 2 19 2 25 Total Proposed Watts =

3990 255 1728 1530 128 20 24 38 50 7763

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 92% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site:

90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction 2 (Residential mixed use area)

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

SITE LIGHTING (Parking area) POOL (Special feature area)

190000 ft2 8200 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.06 0.14

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes

11400 1148 12548 12548 600

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

SITE LIGHTING ( Parking area 190000 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 1: S5: SITE POLE: Other: LED 2: B6: SITE WALL PACK: Other:

1 1

12 11

150 80

1800 880

POOL ( Special feature area 8200 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 3: S10: POOL BOLLARD: Other: LED 4: S11: POOL TREE LIGHT: Other:

1 19 25 1 6 7 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

475 42 3197

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 76% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 5 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site:

90.1 (2013) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 5a New Construction

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

OAU 1 (outside air unit) (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Gas, Capacity = 100 kBtu/h Proposed Efficiency = 80.00% Et, Required Efficiency: 80.00 % Et (or 78% AFUE) Cooling: 1 each - Single Package DX Unit, Capacity = 66 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser, Air Economizer Proposed Efficiency = 14.20 EER, Required Efficiency: 11.00 EER + 12.7 IEER Fan System: OAU FAN -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 3 Supply, Constant Volume, 1000 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 fan efficiency grade

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 6 of 31

AH 1-1 (Single Zone): Single Package Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 48 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.00 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 46 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: 1600 CFM, 1 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 fan efficiency grade

AH 1-2 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 48 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 46 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: 1600 CFM, 1 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 fan efficiency grade

AH 1-3 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 48 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 46 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: 1600 CFM, 1 HP -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 7 of 31

Quantity System Type & Description Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 fan efficiency grade 1

MSAH 1-1 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 33 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 30 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-2 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 37 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 36 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-3 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 18 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 12 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-4 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 18 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 12 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 1-5 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 18 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 12 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 4-1 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 11 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 9 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 30.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 4-2 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 11 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 9 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 30.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

MSAH 4-3 (Single Zone): Split System Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 11 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF, Required Efficiency = 8.20 HSPF Cooling Mode: Capacity = 9 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 30.00 SEER, Required Efficiency: 14.00 SEER Fan System: None

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 8 of 31

Quantity System Type & Description 1

WHE-1: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 38 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 1.01 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW)

WHE-2: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 47 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 0.87 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW)

WHE-3: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 28 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 1.26 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW)

Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2013) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2013.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 9 of 31

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Envelope Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 4a New Construction 24% EnergyPlus 8.1.0.009 (EPW: USA_IN_Indianapolis.Intl.AP.724380_TMY3.epw)

Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type: Vertical Glazing / Wall Area: Performance Sim. Specs:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Building Area

Designer/Contractor:

Floor Area

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily) : Residential

183970

Envelope Assemblies Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

1570 56236

-----

--20.0

0.730 0.048

0.520 0.032

316

---

0.054

0.064

---

0.300

0.310

---

0.300

0.310

14312

---

0.054

0.064

2316

---

0.300

0.310

572

---

0.300

0.310

---

0.370

836

---

0.330

0.680

2109

---

0.054

0.064

381

---

0.300

0.310

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 1 of 38

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Cont. R-Value

Proposed U-Factor

Budget UFactor(a)

---

0.300

0.310

20103

---

0.054

0.064

3179

---

0.300

0.310

233

---

0.300

0.380

---

0.370

1756

---

0.330

0.680

2974

---

0.054

0.064

320

---

0.300

0.310

---

0.300

0.310

---

0.370

115

---

0.330

0.680

11640

---

0.054

0.064

983

---

0.300

0.310

356

---

0.300

0.310

751

---

0.330

0.680

2384

---

0.054

0.064

292

---

0.300

0.310

270

---

0.300

0.380

140

---

0.330

0.680

19829

---

0.054

0.064

3455

---

0.300

0.310

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 2 of 38

Assembly

Gross Area Cavity or R-Value Perimeter

Glazed Door copy 3: Glass (> 50% glazing):Metal Frame, Entrance Door, Perf. Specs.: Product ID Assumption on VT, SHGC 0.40, VT 0.35, [Bldg. Use 1 - Multifamily Area] (c) (a) (b) (c) (d)

1733

---

Proposed U-Factor

Cont. R-Value ---

0.330

Budget UFactor(a) 0.680

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 3 of 38

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Interior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information 90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction

Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type:

Construction Site:

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Interior Lighting Power A Area Category

B Floor Area (ft2)

1-Multifamily Area (Multifamily)

C Allowed Watts / ft2

183970

D Allowed Watts (B X C)

0.68

125100

Total Allowed Watts =

125100

Proposed Interior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2

266 15 17 15 32 54 34 45 4 32 2 10 3 8 2 19 2 25 Total Proposed Watts =

3990 255 1728 1530 128 20 24 38 50 7763

Interior Lighting PASSES: Design 94% better than code Interior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed interior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed interior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 4 of 38

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Exterior Lighting Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Project Type: Exterior Lighting Zone

Construction Site:

90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building New Construction 2 (Residential mixed use area)

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Allowed Exterior Lighting Power A Area/Surface Category

B Quantity

SITE LIGHTING (Parking area) POOL (Special feature area)

190000 ft2 8200 ft2

C Allowed Watts / Unit 0.04 0.1

D Tradable Wattage

E Allowed Watts (B X C)

Yes Yes

7600 820 8420 8420 400

Total Tradable Watts (a) = Total Allowed Watts = Total Allowed Supplemental Watts (b) =

(a) Wattage tradeoffs are only allowed between tradable areas/surfaces. (b) A supplemental allowance equal to 400 watts may be applied toward compliance of both non-tradable and tradable areas/surfaces.

Proposed Exterior Lighting Power A Fixture ID : Description / Lamp / Wattage Per Lamp / Ballast

B Lamps/ Fixture

C D # of Fixture Fixtures Watt.

E (C X D)

SITE LIGHTING ( Parking area 190000 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 1: S5: SITE POLE: Other: LED 2: B6: SITE WALL PACK: Other:

1 1

12 11

150 80

1800 880

POOL ( Special feature area 8200 ft2): Tradable Wattage LED 3: S10: POOL BOLLARD: Other: LED 4: S11: POOL TREE LIGHT: Other:

1 19 25 1 6 7 Total Tradable Proposed Watts =

475 42 3197

Exterior Lighting PASSES: Design 64% better than code Exterior Lighting Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed exterior lighting design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed exterior lighting systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 5 of 38

COMcheck Software Version 4.1.5.1

Mechanical Compliance Certificate Project Information Energy Code: Project Title: Location: Climate Zone: Project Type:

Construction Site:

90.1 (2016) Standard IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Indianapolis, Indiana 4a New Construction

Owner/Agent:

Designer/Contractor:

Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type & Description 1

OAU 1 (outside air unit) (Single Zone): Heating: 1 each - Central Furnace, Gas, Capacity = 100 kBtu/h Proposed Efficiency = 80.00% Et, Required Efficiency: 80.00 % Et (or 78% AFUE) Cooling: 1 each - Single Package DX Unit, Capacity = 66 kBtu/h, Air-Cooled Condenser, Air Economizer Proposed Efficiency = 14.20 EER, Required Efficiency: 11.00 EER + 12.7 IEER Fan System: OAU FAN -- Compliance (Motor nameplate HP method) : Passes Fans: FAN 3 Supply, Constant Volume, 1000 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 fan efficiency grade

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 6 of 38

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 7 of 38

Quantity System Type & Description Fans: FAN 1 Supply, Constant Volume, 1600 CFM, 1.0 motor nameplate hp, 0.0 fan efficiency grade 1

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 8 of 38

Quantity System Type & Description 1

WHE-1: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 38 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 1.01 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW)

WHE-2: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 47 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 0.87 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW)

WHE-3: Electric Storage Water Heater, Capacity: 28 gallons Proposed Efficiency: 0.95 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW), Required Efficiency: 1.26 SL, %/h (if > 12 kW)

Mechanical Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 90.1 (2016) Standard requirements in COMcheck Version 4.1.5.1 and to comply with any applicable mandatory requirements listed in the Inspection Checklist.

Name - Title

Signature

Date

Project Title: IECC-FIAS - Multifamily Building Data filename: \\bdmd.local\UEM\UserShare\doverbey\Desktop\Project Hawk COMcheck - 02 - 2016.cck

Report date: 01/18/21 Page 9 of 38

Name Email Company Name

Project link Project Name

Dan Overbey djoverbey@bsu.edu Ball State University Mon Jan 18 2021 12:20:29 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) https://sefaira.sketc hup.com/page/proje ct/345469 Project Hawk

Input Type

Units (IP)

Date

Building Location Orientation Building Area Conditioned Area Ignored Zones Area

Sefaira ID deg ft2 ft2 ft2

Zoning Strategy Perimeter Depth Massing Energy Plus version

ft2 Sefaira ID -

Exterior Wall Assembly Type

North East South West

ft2⋅h⋅°F/BTU ft2⋅h⋅°F/BTU ft2⋅h⋅°F/BTU ft2⋅h⋅°F/BTU

90.1-2007 cz5 MF 332392 Indianapolis, US 0 208552 208552 0 Basic Perimeter / Core 4.572 1586399 8.5

Existing (actual wall U; OAU-1 same as 2007) 332392 Indianapolis, US 0 208552 208552 0 Basic Perimeter / Core 4.572 1587140 8.5

90.1-2010 cz5 MF 332392 Indianapolis, US 0 208552 208552 0 Basic Perimeter / Core 4.572 1588130 8.5

90.1-2013 cz5 MF 332392 Indianapolis, US 0 208552 208552 0 Basic Perimeter / Core 4.572 1588133 8.5

90.1-2016 cz5 MF 332392 Indianapolis, US 0 208552 208552 0 Basic Perimeter / Core 4.572 1588135 8.5

Stud Stud Stud Stud Stud U-factor / R-value U-factor / R-value U-factor / R-value U-factor / R-value U-factor / R-value 13.3 18.36 18.36 18.36 18.36 13.3 18.36 18.36 18.36 18.36 13.3 18.36 18.36 18.36 18.36 13.3 18.36 18.36 18.36 18.36

Facade Glazing U-factor

U-factor 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

U-factor

North East South West

Floors Assembly Type U-factor / R-value

ft2⋅h⋅°F/BTU

Roof Glazing U-factor SHGC

BTU/h⋅ft2⋅°F -

Roofs Assembly Type U-factor / R-value

ft2⋅h⋅°F/BTU

Slope Frame

Infiltration Air Changes Facade Area 50 Pa Facade Area 75 Pa Crack Infiltration

cfm/ft2 cfm/ft2 cfm/ft

Window to Wall Ratio North East South

n/a n/a n/a

SHGC 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

Carpet

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

U-factor

BTU/h⋅ft2⋅°F BTU/h⋅ft2⋅°F BTU/h⋅ft2⋅°F BTU/h⋅ft2⋅°F SHGC

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

U-factor

North East South West

SHGC 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

Carpet

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 SHGC

0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

Carpet

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 SHGC

0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

Carpet

0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35

Carpet

10.4

0.42 0.6

Slope Frame 20

0.532

Slope Frame 20

0.394

Slope Frame 20

0.394

West Shading 3D Model Shading Analyse Shading Drawn in 3D Model Software Shading

North East South West

n/a

TRUE

Horizontal Shading Ratio

0 0 0 0 Vertical Shading Ratio

North East South West Automated Blinds and Shades

North East South West

W/ft2 W/ft2 W/ft2 W/ft2

Vertical Shading Ratio 0 0 0 0

FALSE Shading Type Applied n/a n/a n/a n/a Control Basis n/a n/a n/a n/a Solar Gain Threshold n/a n/a n/a n/a

Active Space Use Template Total Area of Zones Affected ft2 Total Area Percentage of Zones Affected %

Outside Air Rate / Person Outside Air Rate / Unit Area Outside Air Rate Changes per Hour Total Air Rate Changes per Hour

FALSE Shading Type Applied n/a n/a n/a n/a Control Basis n/a n/a n/a n/a Solar Gain Threshold n/a n/a n/a n/a

208552

100 Design Loads

0 0 0 0

208552

100 Design Loads

398.14

0.5

0.3

0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 Ventilation and OA Ventilation and OA Ventilation and OA Ventilation and OA Ventilation and OA

cfm/person

32.5

cfm/ft2

0.06

0.04

1/h 1/h

F F F F

0 Temperature Setpoints

69.6 67.8 75.7 75.9 HVAC Schedule

Operating Hours Start Operating Hours End

Vertical Shading Ratio 0 0 0 0

208552

100

0 0 0 0

398.14

Temperature Setpoints Heating Setpoint Heating Setback Cooling Setpoint Cooling Setback

Vertical Shading Ratio

FALSE Shading Type Applied n/a n/a n/a n/a Control Basis n/a n/a n/a n/a Solar Gain Threshold n/a n/a n/a n/a

Design Loads

0 0 0 0

208552

100

W/ft2 W/ft2

0 0 0 0

208552

ft2/person

0 0 0 0 Vertical Shading Ratio

FALSE Shading Type Applied n/a n/a n/a n/a Control Basis n/a n/a n/a n/a Solar Gain Threshold n/a n/a n/a n/a

Design Loads Occupant Density Equipment Power Density Lighting Power Density

0 0 0 0

0 Temperature Setpoints

69.6 67.8 75.7 75.9 HVAC Schedule

0 Temperature Setpoints

69.6 67.8 75.7 75.9 HVAC Schedule

0 Temperature Setpoints

69.6 67.8 75.7 75.9 HVAC Schedule

Setback to Setpoint Ramp Up Time hr

1 Annual Diversity Schedule

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Internal Loads Applied HVAC System Operating On

hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr hr

1 Annual Diversity Schedule

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3

1 Annual Diversity Schedule

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3

1 Annual Diversity Schedule

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3

1 Annual Diversity Schedule

0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3

Day Schedules

7 days per week

Package Terminal AC

Air Handling Unit Info DOAS

Zone ventilation rate Air-cooled DX n/a Gas

0.5

HVAC System - Air Side System Type Central Air Handling Unit / Ventilation Unit Details Type Design Ventilation Airflow Basis Cooling Coil Source Cooling COP Heating Coil Source Heat Recovery Sensible Efficiency Heat Recovery Latent Efficiency Economizer Strategy Peak Specific Fan Power System Heat Rejection (VRF System specific) Cooling COP (VRF System specific) Heating COP (VRF System specific)

0 Always 100% outside air

W/cfm

AHU Design Supply Air Temperature F Supply Air Temperature Reset Strategy -

0 Always 100% outside air

1.65

0 Always 100% outside air

1.65

0 Always 100% outside air

1.65

0 Always 100% outside air

1.65

n/a

Air Leaving HVAC Unit

n/a

Supply Air Dewpoint Temperature Minimum F Supply Air Dewpoint Temperature Maximum F Zone Equipment Zone / Terminal Unit Type Heating Type Zone Unit Cooling Design Air Temperature Zone Unit Heating Design Air Temperature Minimum Turndown Ratio (for zones with variable primary air) Cooling Efficiency COP Heating Efficiency COP Cooling Coil Source Heating Coil Source Supplemental Heat Peak Specific Fan Power Control Thermostat Type Air Diffuser Type

Displacement System Inputs Space Type basis for heat displacement Occupant Load Displacement Rate Lighting Load Displacement Rate

55.4

Package Terminal AC unit n/a

55.4

n/a

n/a 2.78

n/a n/a n/a HHW Loop

W/cfm

n/a 2.78

n/a n/a n/a HHW Loop 0.3

n/a 3

n/a n/a n/a HHW Loop 0.3

n/a 3

n/a n/a n/a HHW Loop 0.3

3 n/a n/a n/a HHW Loop

0.3

Dry Bulb Temperature Ceiling Diffuser

n/a

Name Email Company Name Date Project link Project Name

Dan Overbey djoverbey@bsu.edu Ball State University Mon Jan 18 2021 12:20:10 GMT0500 (Eastern Standard Time) https://sefaira.sketchup.com/pag e/project/345469 Project Hawk Air Handling

Iteration Name

Primary HVAC System

90.1-2007 cz5 MF Existing 90.1-2010 cz5 MF 90.1-2013 cz5 MF 90.1-2016 cz5 MF

Package Terminal AC Package Terminal AC Package Terminal AC Package Terminal AC Package Terminal AC

AHU Design Airflow cfm 29514 25346 25346 25346 25346

AHU Minimum Outside Airflow cfm 29514 25346 25346 25346 25346

Cooling Cooling Equipment Design Capacity ton 339.3 299.5 281.3 275.1 269.5

Total Peak Cooling Coil Load ton 339.3 299.5 281.3 275.1 269.5

AHU Peak Cooling Coil Load ton 222.7 191.3 191.2 191.2 191.2

All Zones Peak Cooling Coil Load ton 116.6 108.2 90.1 83.9 78.3

Chilled Water Pumps gpm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Highest Peak Cooling Load by Zone BTU/h/ft2 23 20 19 19 18

Heating Heating Equipment Design Capacity MBh 2587.3 2225.1 2226.0 2226.3 2226.6

Total Peak Heating Coil Load MBh 2323.4 1998.4 1998.4 1998.4 1998.4

AHU Peak Heating Coil Load MBh 733.2 629.7 629.7 629.7 629.7

All Zones Peak Heating Coil Load MBh 1590.2 1368.7 1368.7 1368.7 1368.7

Heating Water Pumps gpm 257.8 220.6 223.4 224.6 226.0

Heat Rejection Highest Peak Heating Load by Zone BTU/h/ft2 13 11 11 11 11

Heat Rejection Design Capacity ton 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Condenser Water Pumps gpm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Energy Use HVAC Energy per Unit Area kBTU/ft2/yr 34.27 27.57 29.14 30.03 30.96

Annual Cooling Energy per Unit Area kBTU/ft2/yr 5.59 4.86 4.66 4.63 4.59

Annual Heating Energy per Unit Area kBTU/ft2/yr 20.48 15.74 17.46 18.36 19.32

EUI kBTU/ft2/yr 47.15 40.44 38.80 38.61 38.47

Annual Electricity Demand kWh 1633556.5 1512737.6 1307781.0 1240856.8 1174198.2

Annual Gas Use therms 42438.61 32599.85 36172.73 38063.31 40055.95

Energy Costs Renewable Energy Generated kWh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Annual Net Electricity Use kWh 1633556.5 1512737.6 1307781.0 1240856.8 1174198.2

Annual Energy Cost $ 176248.8 158108.8 142774.2 138318.5 133964.0

Annual Electricity Cost $ 143916.3 133272.2 115215.5 109319.5 103446.9

Annual Gas Cost $ 32332.4 24836.7 27558.7 28999.1 30517.2

Annual Energy Cost Per Area $/ft2 0.85 0.76 0.68 0.66 0.64

Co2e Emissions Annual Electricity Cost Per Area $/ft2 0.69 0.64 0.55 0.52 0.50

Annual Gas Cost Per Area $/ft2 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15

Annual Net CO2e Emissions lbCO2e/yr 3874009.80 3231732.71 3218110.56 3252102.08 3291775.47

Comfort Annual Net CO2e Per Area lbCO2e/ft2 18.58 15.50 15.43 15.59 15.78

Total Unmet Hours hrs

% Unmet Hours % hrs

Number of zones failing - Dry Bulb

Av. % Comfortable - Dry Bulb %

% Building Passing - Dry Bulb % area

Worst zone % comfortable - DB %

APPENDIX E: 2010 INDIANA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE FISCAL IMPACT REPORT This appendix includes the 2010 Indiana Energy Conservation Codie (2010 IECC) fiscal impact report for the Indiana Department of Homeland Security. This document, which was received from a public records request, was included with a memorandum filed by the State’s Budget Agency on November 16, 2009. This document served as a critical reference for this study as it established a documented precedent for an energy code-related fiscal impact assessment.

APPENDIX F: HISTORICAL STATE REFERENCE DOCUMENTS This appendix includes the following publicly-issued documents for reference: 1.

State of Indiana – Executive Order 2-89: Requiring that state agencies calculate the fiscal impact of proposed rules and submit such rules to the State Budget Agency for approval. Effective January 18, 1989.

Financial Management Circular - #2010-4: Required Documents for Budget Agency Approval. Effective November 1, 2010.

State of Indiana – Executive Order 13-03: Promoting job creation, economic development, and freedom by ordering a moratorium on regulations. Effective January 14, 2013.

Financial Management Circular - #2015-1: Regulatory Moratorium. Effective December 17, 2015.

Financial Management Circular:

#2015-1

Effective Date:

December 18, 2015

General Subject:

Administrative Rulemaking

Specific Subject:

Regulatory Moratorium

Authority:

IC 4-3-22-1; IC 4-3-22-14; IC 4-3-22-15; Executive Order 2-89; Executive Order 13-03

WHEREAS, Executive Order 13-03 established the “Regulatory Moratorium” to suspend administrative agency rulemaking; WHEREAS, Executive Order 13-03 tasks the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) with conducting a comprehensive review and evaluation of existing administrative rules; WHEREAS, Executive Order 13-03 permits limited exceptions to the Regulatory Moratorium and requires agencies to cooperate with and report certain information to OMB; and WHEREAS, Financial Management Circular #2013-1 was instituted to guide implementation of the Regulatory Moratorium, and agencies would benefit from an update to the process originally implemented. 1. This Financial Management Circular (FMC) establishes the procedures OMB will use to implement Executive Order 13-03, including the review of claimed exceptions to the Regulatory Moratorium and requirements to report on the proposed or pending use of rulemaking authority whose source is not within Ind. Code 4-22-2 or Ind. Code 13-14-9 (including emergency rulemaking authority). Procedure for requesting an exception to the Regulatory Moratorium 2. Beginning December 18, 2015, this FMC applies to any request for an exception to the Regulatory Moratorium. 3. The Regulatory Moratorium does not apply to: a. Rules to fulfill an objective related to job creation and increasing investment in Indiana or to improve the quality of Indiana’s workforce; b. Rules that repeal existing rules or reduce their regulatory impact; c. Rules that implement a federal mandate and no waiver is permitted; d. Rules necessary to avoid a violation of a court order or federal law that would result in sanctions by a court or the federal government against the state for failure to conduct the rulemaking action; e. Rules to address matters pertaining to the control, mitigation, or eradication of waste, fraud, or abuse within a state agency or wasteful or abusive activities perpetrated against a state agency; f. Rules that reduce State spending; or

g. Rules whose predominate purpose and effect are to address matters of emergency or health or safety, including the promulgation of an emergency rule under Ind. Code § 4-22-2-37.1. 4. To receive a determination whether an exception applies to a proposed rule, the agency head shall submit a request in writing addressed to OMB via e-mail, sent to sbarules@gov.in.gov. The agency head shall submit this request before filing a notice of intent to adopt a rule under Ind. Code 4-22-2 or a notice under Ind. Code 13-14-9. 5. In order to facilitate OMB’s review of proposed rules, the request shall include the following information: a. Detailed summary of the proposed rule, including, but not limited to, the following: i. a history and background of the rule; ii. the reasons for the proposed rule; iii. the statutory authority for the proposed rule; iv. the statutory authority for the agency to promulgate the proposed rule; and v. a description of the existing legal framework governing the subject matter of the proposed rule with reference to all applicable statutes, regulations, and other legal provisions; b. Identification of the exceptions that the agency believes permit the agency to promulgate the rule notwithstanding the Regulatory Moratorium and a detailed explanation of why each identified exception applies; c. Fiscal Impact Analysis as described in FMC #2010-4; d. Cost-Benefit Analysis as described in FMC #2010-4; e. Copy of the proposed rule, if a draft is available; and f. Contact information (name, phone number, email address) for an agency staff member who can answer substantive questions about the proposed rule and the underlying policy area. This information will better equip OMB to review proposed rules to determine their eligibility for an exception under the Regulatory Moratorium and enable OMB to provide guidance to agencies as they navigate the process. This information will also expedite OMB review of proposed rules following publication of the notice of intent to adopt a rule in the Indiana Register by enabling OMB to provide substantive commentary on the proposed rule early in the rule-making process. 6. The OMB Director shall issue a determination in writing regarding the applicability of an exception. 7. If the OMB Director determines no exception applies to a proposed rule, the Regulatory Moratorium suspends any formal rulemaking activity with regard to the proposed rule. Under these circumstances, the agency must not file a notice of intent to adopt a rule (under Ind. Code 4-22-2) or a notice under Ind. Code 13-14-9 with regard to the proposed rule until the Regulatory Moratorium ends. 8. If the OMB Director determines an exception applies to a proposed rule, the agency may file a notice of intent to adopt a rule (under Ind. Code 4-22-2) or a notice under Ind. Code 13-

14-9 with regard to a proposed rule. For a proposed rule that qualifies for an exception under the Regulatory Moratorium, all other applicable procedures under statute, Executive Order 2-89 and FMC No. 2010-4 govern the promulgation of the proposed rule. Requirement to report any proposed or pending rules whose source of promulgation authority is not within Ind. Code 4-22-2 or Ind. Code 13-14-9 9. An agency shall notify the OMB Director in writing via e-mail, sent to sbarules@gov.in.gov, as soon as practicable of any proposed or pending rulemaking action for which legal authority is not within Ind. Code 4-22-2 or Ind. Code 13-14-9, and provide the following: a. A summary of the proposed rule; b. A statement regarding the proposed rule’s potential to promote private-sector job growth or foster private-sector economic development; and c. An estimated date of the proposed rule’s adoption. This includes proposed or pending emergency rules. 10. This Circular rescinds FMC #2013-1.