ANALYTIC PERFORMANCE SCORING RUBRICS FOR ELECTRONIC POSTER-MAKING CRITERIA A. CREATIVITY
30%
1. Enhancement 15%
2. Ingenuity/ Innovation 15% B. USE OF PHOTO EDITING TOOLS 25% 1. Utilization of Tools and Features 15% 2. Mastery
10%
C. HARMONY AND BALANCE
15%
D. RELEVANCE TO THE THEME
10%
E. ORAL PRESENTATION
10%
F. SPEED
10%
• All of the objects were created/used to form/signify meaning or individuality • All tools and features were applied in the development of design
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 90 85 • Four (4) to five (5) • Two (2) to three (3) enhancements/innovations in enhancements/innovations in terms of designs and effects terms of designs and effects were observed. were observed. • Four (4) to five (5) of the objects • 50% of the objects were were created/used to form/signify created/used to form/signify meaning or individuality meaning or individuality • Four (4) to five (5) tools and • Two (2) to three (3) tools and features were applied in the features were applied in the development of design development of design
• 25% or less of the objects were created/used to form/signify meaning or individuality • Only one (1) tool and feature was applied in the development of design
• No trial and error in using/applying tools and effects.
• One (1) to two (2) trial/s and error/s in using/applying tools and effects.
• Three (3) to four (4) trials and errors in using/applying tools and effects.
• More than five (5) trials and errors in using/applying tools and effects.
• All of the objects and choice of color were based in the elements and principles of design. • The design clearly reflected the concept/meaning of the theme.
• Four (4) to five (5) of the objects and choice of color were based in the elements and principles of design. • The design reflected some major key points of the theme.
• Two (2) to three (3) of the objects and choice of color were based in the elements and principles of design. • The design reflected minor key points of the theme.
• Only one (1) of the objects and one (1) choice of color was based in the elements and principles of design. • No relevance to the theme.
• No grammatical errors, clear, speaks fluently, justifies key points of the concept being presented. • Finished the output 10 minutes before the allotted time.
• Minimal grammatical errors, clear, justify key points of the concept being presented.
• Minimal grammatical errors, vague key points of the concept being presented.
• Poor grammatical construction, no focus on concept being presented.
• Finished the output 5 minutes before the allotted time.
• Finished the output within the given time.
• Was not able to finish the output within the given time.
95 • All enhancements/ innovations in terms of designs and effects were observed.
80 • No enhancement/ innovation in terms of designs and effects were observed.