study_table

Page 1

STEP Skills Development and Competitions YEAR LEVEL: All Year Levels

CONTEST AREA: Industrial Arts CONTEST PACKAGE Knockdown Toddler's Furniture Study Table TIME ALLOTMENT

ASSESSMENT

RESOURCES

PROCEDURE/SPECIFICATIONS

PERCENTAGE

Workmanship Workmanship

50%

PRELIMINARY ACTIVITIES a. Contest registration of trainers and contestant.

c. tri-square

q b. Submission of required documents for the contest.

d. cross-cut saw

d. Briefing/orientation of trainers with the contest administrator a

Proper Use of Materials, Tools and Equipment

The study table is a form of "Knockdown furniture". the parts Safety Practices can be easily taken apart or can be and Work Habits carried anywhere or assembled without using any fastening materials. It is also a space saving Speed furniture for use in limited area of the home.

day before the actual competition.

25%

e. Inspection and distribution of contest materials and other

paraphernalia.

DURING 15%

a. Briefing of trainers and contestants with the contest

administrator (10 minutes).

d. Other instructions.

AFTER a. Trainers shall serve as judges.

ILLUSTRATION

Communication Skills

5%

Working Drawing EMPLOYABILITY OR BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

For use in areas in the home or office where space is limited. It is very convenient as a study or writing table and can be disassembled after use and kept in storage.

All outputs shall be endorsed to the Secretariat by the Contest Administrator after judging. c. All endorsed outputs shall be displayed until the duration of the skills competition.

b.

NOTES regional organizers may opt to deviate.

TOTAL

ATTACHMENT(S)

100%

b. The knock-down toddlers’ study table will be made based on

the working drawing provided by the organizers. c. Bench woodworking tools shall be used in the competition.

Analytic Scoring Rubrics/ Percentage Table

d. The contestant should raise his hand after finishing the

FORM OF JUDGING

e. Coaches are allowed to observe the process within 3 meter

Power tools are NOT ALLOWED. project and return his tools properly in his toolbox.

Compatriot Judging

range.

f. 1/4" or 1/2" wood chisels g. smooth plane h. compass/ keyhole saw i. mallet j. clawhammer k. l. m. n. o. p.

c-clamp bench hook Auger brace 1/4" or 1/2" Auger bit coping saw Flat file

q. Flat Spokeshave a. working bench with vise

E Q U I P M E N T

a. With regard to the provision of resources, the division and

Furniture and Cabinet Maker USE

e. backsaw

T O O L S

b. Final instructions of trainers with their contestants. c. Inspection of contest materials, tools and equipment

5%

Organizer/s

a. pull-push ruler b. carpenter's square

c. Ocular inspection of the contest venue.

1 1/2 hours DESCRIPTION

Contestant/s

T

CRITERIA

Number of Participants: 1

a. sandpaper (1 rough M A T E R I A L S

emery; 1 fine)

a. 1/2" X 2' X 4' plywood


ANALYTIC PERFORMANCE SCORING RUBRICS FOR KNOCK-DOWN TODDLER’S STUDY TABLE CRITERIA A. WORKMANSHIP 1. Accuracy

50% 30%

95 • All measurements were accurate.

PERFORMANCE LEVEL 90 85 • Most measurements were • Some measurements were accurate. inaccurate.

2. Stability/Quality

10%

• All joints were snugly fitted.

• Some joints were well-fitted.

• Some joints were slightly loose.

• Most joints were loosely fitted.

• All surfaces were sanded.

• Some surfaces were sanded.

• Was able to economically use all the materials.

• Most of the surfaces were sanded. • Was able to economically use most of the materials.

• Was able to economically use some of the materials.

• No attempt to smoothen the surface. • Most materials go to waste.

• Appropriate tools/equipments were used at all times. • Well-organized placement of tools and materials.

• Appropriate tools/equipments were used most of the time. • Organized placement of tools and materials.

• Appropriate tools/equipments were properly used at times. • Not so organized placement of tools and materials.

• Inappropriate tools/equipments were used at all times. • Disorganized in its placement of tools and materials.

• Observed proper housekeeping during and after task.

• Observed proper housekeeping during task.

• Sometimes observed proper housekeeping during and after task.

• Did not observe proper housekeeping during and after task.

• Used appropriate safety gears.

• Observed once not using appropriate safety gears.

• Observed twice not using appropriate safety gears.

• Finished the project 10 minutes before the given time.

• Finished the project 5 minutes before the given time.

• Finished the project within time limit.

• Observed twice or more not using appropriate safety gears. • No attempt to finish the project on time.

• Able to clearly discuss/explain with confidence all of the following: a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity

• Able to clearly discuss/explain with confidence 4 of the following:

• Able to clearly discuss/explain with confidence 3 of the following:

• Able to clearly discuss/explain with confidence 2 of the following:

a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity

a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity

a. process b. function of tools, materials and equipment c. cost of production d. employability e. business opportunity

3. Surface Preparation 10%

B. PROPER USE OF MATERIALS, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT

25%

C. SAFETY PRACTICES AND WORK HABITS

15%

D. SPEED/TIME

E. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (3-5 minutes only)

5%

5%

80 • Most measurements were inaccurate.



Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.