Introducing the Effective Git Flow Branching Strategy for Your PC

Introducing the Effective Git Flow Branching Strategy for Your PC The Git Flow library of Git subcommands helps automate parts of the Git branching and release management workflows that help developers track features, hotfixes, and releases for large software projects, making working with these workflows much easier.

Similar to GitHub Flow branching strategy, the main differentiation is the addition of environmental industries (production, preproduction and release industries) depending on the situation. Git flow branching strategy takes the repository as its origin and introduces the release branch into the master tag, where it merges with the developer and removes it. Once the release merges with the master and development branches, Git Flow switches to the ready-to-use master branch.

Git flow is a Git branch model that uses two short-lived branches: the main branch (also known as master) for development. A variety of support branches are deployed between the main and development branches to support production releases, hot fixes and parallel feature development to support development and release activities. While Git Flow uses the main development branch, GitLab uses flow staging and production environments on the main branch.

While the main branch (master) is being developed, our development model uses a variety of supporting branches to support parallel development between team members, facilitate feature

tracking, prepare for production releases, and help resolve production problems. In our development models, there is a need for a number of support branches for parallel development, tracking capabilities, and support for quick fixes to releases and other issues. There are many release branches and feature branches, but the hotfix branch is based on main and development.

Feature branches (also called topic branches) are used to develop new features for an upcoming or future release. Essentially, a feature branch itself is an existing feature in development that can be merged with development to add a feature to the target release, where it can be integrated or discarded in the event of a disappointing experiment. In this model the developer creates the branch of the feature and delays merging with the trunk branch until the feature is complete.

New developments such as features and emergency bug fixes are done in feature branches and integrated into the main body of the code when developers are satisfied that the code is ready for release. In the GitLab Flow, feature branches with functioning new features and bug fixes can be merged into major branches when completed, reviewed and approved. Features required for the release are completed in the merged development branch or release branch developed by its parent branch.

At the same time, when you start working on a new release, the development branch has the same benefits as the classic Git Flow. Your new release is considered stable and can be deployed in the production environment as a final release with a single squash merge into the main branch and the feature branch takes care of the fixes.

We do not have to create a new release branch for each name of the development features to implement hotfixes. Instead, a developer can create new feature branches, create his local system, make changes, and commit them.

When the developers are done with their features, they can merge and deploy the two separate branches into the master branch without having to wait for the completion of a second feature.

The Git feature branch workflow gets even faster when multiple developers work on the same code base. Your team can work together more efficiently and spend less time managing project versions when using a simple and clear branching strategy such as the Git flow branching strategy.

TBD Flow follows a trunk-to-mainline-based branching strategy for development and release. Git Flow suggests dividing the main branch into a development branch and a support branch for features, releases, hotfixes, etc. The support branch and the branch to merge should be named after the convention of lifelong remarks: Developed features should be developed in master, developed in release, and hotfixes should be in feature development, and features should never interact with master.

The Git flow process addresses the basic scenario by separating the main branch (production or current version) for development from the next release and providing rules for the use of features released and hotfixes in each branch.

Git Flow released in 2010 by Vincent Driessen provides a robust workflow with a rigorous branching model focused on project releases. In this post, I will perform a comparative analysis

of the three most commonly used branching strategies for Git Flow: trunk-based development, GitHub and flow. Mainline-based and feature-based.

Branching Strategy refers to the strategy that software development teams use when writing, merging, and sending code in context of a version control system (Git). Git, specifically, helps developers work with teammates on code by combining powerful features like commits, branches and specific principles into a strategy that helps teams organize code and reduce versioning time. The answer to the question of which Git branching strategy is best depends on you, your team environment, the product, and your specific development needs.

We compare several common Git branching strategy for trunk-based development and learn how they solve the pros and cons of each of these strategies and how they enable modern software deployment practices and feature flag management. All things you need to track, understand and consider in your build and release process are feature branches, release branches, master-developed hotfix branches and Git tags. When a development team goes into production the problem is that the volume of the next release will accumulate in the same place where production code lives - for example in the main branch of Git repos.