Institutions of the global south third world global institutions 1 new edition braveboy-wagner all c

Page 1


download ebook at ebookgate.com InstitutionsoftheGlobalSouthThirdWorld GlobalInstitutions1NewEditionBraveboyWagner

https://ebookgate.com/product/institutions-of-theglobal-south-third-world-globalinstitutions-1-new-edition-braveboy-wagner/

Download more ebook from https://ebookgate.com

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...

Diplomatic Strategies of Rising Nations in the Global South 2nd Edition Jacqueline Braveboy-Wagner

https://ebookgate.com/product/diplomatic-strategies-of-risingnations-in-the-global-south-2nd-edition-jacqueline-braveboywagner/

World Health Organization Global Institutions 1st Edition Kelley Lee

https://ebookgate.com/product/world-health-organization-globalinstitutions-1st-edition-kelley-lee/

Global Governance Poverty and Inequality Global Institutions First Edition Rorden Wilkinson

https://ebookgate.com/product/global-governance-poverty-andinequality-global-institutions-first-edition-rorden-wilkinson/

The European Union Routledge Global Institutions 1st Edition Clive Archer

https://ebookgate.com/product/the-european-union-routledgeglobal-institutions-1st-edition-clive-archer/

Power and Global Economic Institutions 1st Edition Ayse Kaya

https://ebookgate.com/product/power-and-global-economicinstitutions-1st-edition-ayse-kaya/

The European Union Explained Second Edition Institutions Actors Global Impact Andreas Staab

https://ebookgate.com/product/the-european-union-explainedsecond-edition-institutions-actors-global-impact-andreas-staab/

ISO the International Organization for Standardization Global Governance through Voluntary Consensus Global Institutions 1st Edition Craig N Murphy

https://ebookgate.com/product/iso-the-international-organizationfor-standardization-global-governance-through-voluntaryconsensus-global-institutions-1st-edition-craig-n-murphy/

The United Nations Security Council A Primer Global Institutions 1st Edition E.C. Luck

https://ebookgate.com/product/the-united-nations-securitycouncil-a-primer-global-institutions-1st-edition-e-c-luck/ Commonwealth Inter and Non state Contributions to Global Governance Routledge Global Institutions 1st Edition Timothy M. Shaw

https://ebookgate.com/product/commonwealth-inter-and-non-statecontributions-to-global-governance-routledge-globalinstitutions-1st-edition-timothy-m-shaw/

InstitutionsoftheGlobalSouth

Asian,African,andLatinAmericanstateshaveoftenpursuedastrategy ofbandingtogethereitherregionallyorgloballyinordertoachieve certaingoalsandtolowertheirtransactioncostswhiledoingso.Inthis book,JacquelineAnneBraveboy-Wagnerclearlyassessestheachievements,performance,andresponsesofmajorglobalsouthinstitutions toshowhowandwhysucharrangementsarecriticaltothesouth’ s effortstocalltheinternationalcommunity’sattentiontotheirconcerns andtoresolvetheirspecialproblems.

Thebook:

offersarationalefortheinstitutionaldevelopmentoftheglobalsouth elaboratesonthescopeofmembership,structure,aims,andproblems facingsuchinstitutions assessestheutilityoftricontinentalpoliticalandeconomicorganizations examinesthehistoryandactivitiesofregion-wideorganizations evaluatesthepotentialofsubregionalintegrationarrangements analyzestheapplicabilityofvarioustheories,andmakessuggestions withrespecttothestudyofglobalsouthinstitutions.

Thelackofacomprehensiveandaccessiblecompilationoftheinstitutionsthatareofkeyimportancetotheglobalsouthinthepostwar periodmakesthisbookessentialreadingtostudentsandscholarsin the fieldsofinternationalorganization,internationalpolitics,foreign policy,internationaldevelopment,andglobalsouthpublicpolicies.

JacquelineAnneBraveboy-Wagner isProfessorofPoliticalScienceat TheCityCollege,andatTheGraduateSchoolandUniversityCenter oftheCityUniversityofNewYork.Sheisaspecialistinforeignpolicy andinternationaldevelopmentwithanareastudiesfocusontheCaribbean smallstatesandtheglobalsouth.

RoutledgeGlobalInstitutions

TheCUNYGraduateCenter,NewYork,USA andRordenWilkinson UniversityofManchester,UK

AbouttheSeries

TheGlobalInstitutionsSeriesisdesignedtoprovidereaderswithcomprehensive, accessible,andinformativeguidestothehistory,structure,andactivitiesofkey internationalorganizations.Everyvolumestandsonitsownasathoroughand insightfultreatmentofaparticulartopic,buttheseriesasawholecontributes toacoherentandcomplementaryportraitofthephenomenonofglobalinstitutionsatthedawnofthemillennium.

Booksarewrittenbyrecognizedexperts,conformtoasimilarstructure,and coverarangeofthemesanddebatescommontotheseries.Theseareasof sharedconcernincludethegeneralpurposeandrationalefororganizations, developmentsovertime,membership,structure,decision-makingprocedures, andkeyfunctions.Moreover,currentdebatesareplacedinhistoricalperspectivealongsideinformedanalysisandcritique.Eachbookalsocontainsan annotatedbibliographyandguidetoelectronicinformationaswellasany annexesappropriatetothesubjectmatterathand.

Thevolumescurrentlypublishedorundercontractinclude:

TheUnitedNationsandHuman Rights(2005)

Aguideforanewera

byJulieMertus(American University)

TheUNSecretaryGeneraland Secretariat(2005)

byLeonGordenker(Princeton University)

UnitedNationsGlobalConferences (2005)

byMichaelG.Schechter(Michigan StateUniversity)

TheUNGeneralAssembly(2005) byM.J.Peterson(Universityof Massachusetts,Amherst)

InternalDisplacement(2006) Conceptualizationandits consequences byThomasG.Weiss(TheCUNY GraduateCenter)and DavidA.Korn

GlobalEnvironmentalInstitutions (2006)

byElizabethR.DeSombre (WellesleyCollege)

TheUNSecurityCouncil(2006) Practiceandpromise byEdwardC.Luck(Columbia University)

TheWorldIntellectualProperty Organization(2006) Resurgenceandthedevelopment agenda byChrisMay(Universityof Lancaster)

TheNorthAtlanticTreaty Organization(2007) Theenduringalliance byJulianLindley-French(European UnionCentreforSecurityStudies)

TheInternationalMonetaryFund (2007) Politicsofconditionallending byJamesRaymondVreeland(Yale University)

TheGroupof7/8(2007) byHugoDobson(Universityof Sheffield)

TheWorldEconomicForum(2007) Amulti-stakeholderapproachto globalgovernance byGeoffreyAllenPigman (BenningtonCollege)

TheInternationalCommitteeofthe RedCross(2007) Aneutralhumanitarianactor byDavidP.Forsythe(Universityof Nebraska)and BarbaraAnnRieffer-Flanagan (CentralWashingtonUniversity)

TheOrganizationforSecurityand Co-operationinEurope(2007) byDavidJ.Galbreath(University ofAberdeen)

UnitedNationsConferenceon TradeandDevelopment(UNCTAD) (2007) byIanTaylor(Universityof St.Andrews)andKarenSmith (UniversityofStellenbosch)

ACrisisofGlobalInstitutions? (2007) Multilateralismandinternational security byEdwardNewman(Universityof Birmingham)

TheWorldTradeOrganization (2007) Law,economics,andpolitics byBernardM.Hoekman(World Bank)andPetrosC.Mavroidis (ColumbiaUniversity)

TheAfricanUnion(2008) Challengesofglobalization,security, andgovernance bySamuelM.Makinda(Murdoch University)andF.WafulaOkumu (InstituteforSecurityStudies)

Commonwealth(2008) Inter-andnon-statecontributions toglobalgovernance byTimothyM.Shaw(RoyalRoads UniversityandUniversityofthe WestIndies)

TheEuropeanUnion(2008) byCliveArcher(Manchester MetropolitanUniversity)

TheWorldBank(2008) Fromreconstructiontodevelopment toequity byKatherineMarshall(Georgetown University)

ContemporaryHumanRightsIdeas (2008)

byBertrandG.Ramcharan(Geneva GraduateInstituteofInternational andDevelopmentStudies)

TheUnitedNationsHigh CommissionerforRefugees(UNHCR) (2008)

Thepoliticsandpracticeofrefugee protectionintothetwenty-firstcentury byGilLoescher(Universityof Oxford),AlexanderBetts (UniversityofOxford),and JamesMilner(UniversityofToronto)

TheInternationalOlympicCommittee andtheOlympicSystem(2008)

Thegovernanceofworldsport byJean-LoupChappelet(IDHEAP SwissGraduateSchoolofPublic Administration)and BrendaKübler-Mabbott

InstitutionsoftheAsia-Pacific(2009) ASEAN,APEC,andbeyond byMarkBeeson(Universityof Birmingham)

InternetGovernance(2009) Thenewfrontierofglobalinstitutions byJohnMathiason(Syracuse University)

TheWorldHealthOrganization (2009)

byKelleyLee(LondonSchoolof HygieneandTropicalMedicine)

InternationalJudicialInstitutions (2009) Thearchitectureofinternational justiceathomeandabroad byRichardJ.Goldstone(Retired JusticeoftheConstitutionalCourtof SouthAfrica)andAdamM.Smith

InstitutionsoftheGlobalSouth(2009) byJacquelineAnneBraveboy-Wagner (CityCollegeofNewYork)

GlobalFoodandAgricultural Institutions(2009) byJohnShaw

ShapingtheHumanitarianWorld (2009) byPeterWalker(TuftsUniversity) andDanielMaxwell(Tufts University)

TheInternationalOrganizationfor StandardizationandtheGlobal Economy(2009) Settingstandards byCraigN.Murphy(Wellesley College)andJoAnneYates (MassachusettsInstituteof Technology) OrganisationforEconomic Co-operationandDevelopment byRichardWoodward(University ofHull)

Non-GovernmentalOrganizationsin GlobalPolitics byPeterWilletts(CityUniversity, London)

TheInternationalLabour Organization bySteveHughes(Universityof Newcastle)andNigelHaworth (TheUniversityofAuckland BusinessSchool)

GlobalInstitutionsandtheHIV/ AIDSEpidemic

Respondingtoaninternationalcrisis byFranklynLisk(Universityof Warwick)

AfricanEconomicInstitutions byKwameAkonor(SetonHall University)

TheUnitedNationsDevelopment Programme(UNDP) byElizabethA.Mandeville(Tufts University)andCraigN.Murphy (WellesleyCollege)

TheRegionalDevelopmentBanks Lendingwitharegional flavor byJonathanR.Strand(University ofNevada,LasVegas)

MultilateralCooperationAgainst Terrorism

byPeterRomaniuk(JohnJay CollegeofCriminalJustice,CUNY)

Peacebuilding Fromconcepttocommission byRobertJenkins(Universityof London)

TransnationalOrganizedCrime byFrankMadsen(Universityof Cambridge)

GoverningClimateChange byPeterNewell(UniversityofEast Anglia)andHarrietA.Bulkeley (DurhamUniversity)

MillenniumDevelopmentGoals (MDGs)

Forapeople-centereddevelopment agenda? bySakikoFukada-Parr(TheNew School)

RegionalSecurity

Thecapacityofinternational organizations byRodrigoTavares(UnitedNations University)

HumanDevelopment byMaggieBlack

Forfurtherinformationregardingtheseries,pleasecontact:

CraigFowlie,Publisher,Politics&InternationalStudies Taylor&Francis 2ParkSquare,MiltonPark,Abingdon OxfordOX144RN,UK

+44(0)2078422057Tel +44(0)2078422302Fax

Craig.Fowlie@tandf.co.uk www.routledge.com

Institutionsofthe GlobalSouth

JacquelineAnneBraveboy-Wagner

Firstpublished2009 byRoutledge

2ParkSquare,MiltonPark,Abingdon,Oxon,OX144RN

SimultaneouslypublishedintheUSAandCanada byRoutledge

270MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NY10016

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business

This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2 008

“To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk ”

©2009JacquelineAnneBraveboy-Wagner

Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthisbookmaybereprintedorreproduced orutilizedinanyformorbyanyelectronic,mechanical,orothermeans, nowknownorhereafterinvented,includingphotocopyingandrecording, orinanyinformationstorageorretrievalsystem,withoutpermissionin writingfromthepublishers.

BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationData

AcataloguerecordforthisbookisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary LibraryofCongressCataloginginPublicationData Braveboy-Wagner,JacquelineAnne. Institutionsoftheglobalsouth/JacquelineAnneBraveboy-Wagner. p.cm. – (Routledgeglobalinstitutions;29) Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex. 1.Developingcountries–Foreignrelations.2.Developingcountries–Foreigneconomicrelations.3.Regionalism.4.International cooperation.I.Title.

D887.B732008

327.091720 4–dc222008012550

I S B N 0-203-01842-7 Master e-b ook I S B N

ISBN978-0-415-36590-1(hbk) ISBN978-0-415-36591-8(pbk) ISBN978-0-203-01842-2(ebk)

Introduction:multilateralismandtheglobalsouth1

1Tricontinentaldiplomacy:theNon-AlignedMovement13

2Tricontinentalfunctionalism:theGroupof7730

3Tricontinentalsingle-issuefunctionalism:theOrganization ofPetroleumExportingCountries55

4Regionalvisions:Pan-Americanism64

5Regionalvisions:Pan-Africanism77

6Regionalvisions:Pan-ArabismandPan-Islam92

7Subregionalcommunities:LatinAmericaandthe Caribbean114

8Subregionalcommunities:Africa146

9Subregionalcommunities:Southeast,South,andWest Asia,andthePacific183

1.1MembershipoftheNon-AlignedMovement(2007)19 2.1MembersoftheGroupof7732

Foreword

Thecurrentvolumeisthetwenty-ninthinadynamicserieson “global institutions.” Theseriesstrives(and,basedonthevolumespublishedto date,succeeds)toprovidereaderswithdefinitiveguidestothemostvisible aspectsofwhatweknowas “globalgovernance.” Remarkableasitmay seem,thereexistrelativelyfewbooksthatofferin-depthtreatmentsof prominentglobalbodies,processes,andassociatedissues,muchlessan entireseriesofconciseandcomplementaryvolumes.Thosethatdo existareeitheroutofdate,inaccessibletothenon-specialistreader,or seektodevelopaspecializedunderstandingofparticularaspectsofan institutionorprocessratherthanofferanoverallaccountofitsfunctioning.Similarly,existingbookshaveoftenbeenwritteninhighly technicallanguageorhavebeencrafted “in-house” andarenotoriously self-servingandnarrow.

Theadventofelectronicmediahashelpedbymakinginformation, documents,andresolutionsofinternationalorganizationsmorewidely available,butithasalsocomplicatedmatters.Thegrowingrelianceon theInternetandotherelectronicmethodsof findinginformationabout keyinternationalorganizationsandprocesseshasserved,ironically,to limittheeducationalmaterialstowhichmostreadershavereadyaccess namely,books.Publicrelationsdocuments,rawdata,andlooselyrefereed websitesdonotmakeforintelligentanalysis.Officialpublicationscompetewithavastamountofelectronicallyavailableinformation,much ofwhichissuspectbecauseofitsideologicalorself-promotingslant. Paradoxically,agrowingrangeofpurportedlyindependentwebsites offeringanalysesoftheactivitiesofparticularorganizationshasemerged, butoneinadvertentconsequencehasbeentofrustrateaccesstobasic, authoritative,critical,andwellresearchedtexts.Themarketforsuch hasactuallybeenreducedbythereadyavailabilityofvaryingquality electronicmaterials.

Forthoseofuswhoteach,research,andpracticeinthearea,this accesstoinformationhasbeenparticularlyfrustrating.Weweredelighted whenRoutledgesawthevalueofaseriesthatbucksthistrendand provideskeyreferencepointstothemostsignificantglobalinstitutions. Theyknowthatseriousstudentsandprofessionalswantseriousanalyses.Wehaveassembleda first-rateline-upofauthorstoaddressthat market.Ourintention,then,istoprovideone-stopshoppingforall readers students(bothundergraduateandpostgraduate),negotiators, diplomats,practitionersfromnongovernmentalandintergovernmental organizations,andinterestedpartiesalike seekinginformationabout themostprominentinstitutionalaspectsofglobalgovernance.

Institutionsoftheglobalsouth

Internationalinstitutionshavebeenprofoundlyimportantforthosecountriesthatwenowrefertoasthe “globalsouth,” butthatearlierwentby anumberofothernames. “Alltermsusedtodenotecountriesneeding ‘development’ haveshortcomings,” notesMaggieBlack. “Axisdescriptors developing/developed,non-industrialized/industrialized,rich/poor arecrudeandvalue-laden.”1 Thismaypartiallyexplainthecontinued popularityof “North” and “South,” whichhavethefewestpejorative connotations.

ManydevelopingcountriespursuedmembershipoftheUnitedNations (UN)asoneofthevery firstpost-independenceactsasameansof signalingtheirarrivalasautonomouspoliticalentitiesaswellas securing,inasmuchasitispossible,theirclaimstosovereigntyunder theprovisionsoftheequalityofmemberstatesunderarticle2ofthe UNCharter.Manynewlyindependentcountriesalsorushedtojoin organizationsliketheWorldBankandInternationalMonetaryFund andinstitutionsliketheGeneralAgreementonTariffsandTrade(GATT) inthehopethatbydoingsotheycouldcementtheirstatehoodtogether inawaythatwasmoreproblematicseparately.

Yet,foralltheirenthusiasmforinternationalinstitutions,developing countrieshavenotbeenbestservedbytheirnumber.Forinstance,despite beingactiveintheGATTfromtheinstitution’screation,developing countrieswerenotwellservedbyitstradeliberalizingactivities,2 and indeedthelackofprogresswasonereasonthattheyeventuallybanded togethertocallforthecreationoftheUnitedNationsConferenceon TradeandDevelopment(UNCTAD).3 IMFandWorldBankpolicies towardstheglobalsouthhavebeenheavilycriticizedfortheirincongruitywiththeneedsofdevelopingcountries.4 Andtheself-interestof

thedominantpowershasensuredthattheUNhasfailedinitsselfstatedaimtoassistthepeoplesoftheworldintimesofcrisisinthe globalsouth:theRwandangenocideisperhapsthemostpoignant example,butthecurrentcrisisinDarfurisofequalsignificance.

Theresponsetothefailingsofglobalinstitutionstoaddresstheir needsleddevelopingcountriestocreatekeyorganizationsoftheirown. Indeed,theoriginalmotivationfortheApril1955conferenceinBandung thatwouldleadtothefoundingoftheNon-AlignedMovement(NAM) wasto findawaytosteerbetweentheSovietUnionandtheUnited StateswithintheconfinesoftheUnitedNations.5 Specifically,many newlyindependentcountrieswerefed-upwiththelogjamresulting fromtheirinabilitytosecureUNmembership,whichhadbecome enmeshedintherivalrybetweenthetwosuperpowers.

WorkinginparallelwiththeNAMbutconcentratingoneconomic issues,anotherconglomerationofdevelopingcountriesbecameknown asthe “Groupof77.”6 TheG77wasnamedaftertwonewmembers joinedtheoriginal75members(whichincludedNewZealand)ina workingcaucustoprepareforthe firstUNConferenceonTradeand Development.ThenumberscontinuedtogrowandNewZealandleft. Althoughtheirnumbersnowareover130,thelabelstuck.7

WhileitiscertainlythecasethatorganizationsliketheNAM,the G77,andUNCTADenabledstateslikeEgypt(underGamalAbdel Nasser),India(underJawaharlalNehru)andYugoslavia(underJosip Tito)tobolstertheirpositionsasregionalpowers,theyalsoprovided importantforumsfordevelopingcountriestoraiseissuesofconcern andtoformallianceswithlike-mindedandnotsolike-mindedstates. Moreover,althoughnoneoftheseinstitutionshascometorivalthe better financedandmorepowerfulactors,theyhavenevertheless ensured,thoughtheirlobbyingactivities,thatinstitutionsliketheIMF, WorldBank,andGATT(andnowtheWorldTradeOrganization) haveatleastadjustedtheirpoliciessuchthattheytakeaccountofthe needsofthedevelopingworld.8

Thepoliticswithintheinstitutionsoftheglobalsouthiscrucial.Not only,asmentionedabove,werethesebodiesusedinaninstrumental fashionbyleadingdevelopingstatestoconsolidatetheirpowerbase, theyhavealsobeenarenasinwhichtheprincipalissuesaffectingthe developingworldhavebeenplayedout:HIV/AIDS,poverty,debt, statecollapse,naturaldisaster,colonialism,amongmanyothers.

Ourseriesregardingthecontemporaryroleofglobalinstitutions wouldhavebeenincompletewithoutabookthatputsintohistorical andpoliticalcontextthevariousinstitutionalmanifestationsofthe globalsouth.Andso,wecouldnothavefoundapersonbetterableto

undertakethistaskthanJacquelineBraveboy-Wagner.Since1984,she hastaughtinternationalrelationsattheCityCollegeofNewYork, andsince1986,alsoatTheGraduateCenteroftheCityUniversityof NewYork.Sheisaspecialistinforeignpolicyandinternational development,withanareastudiesfocusontheCaribbeansmallstates, Caribbean–LatinAmerican,andCaribbean–Asianrelations,9 whohas servedaspresidentandvice-presidentoftheCaribbeanStudies Association.Aspartofherwide-ranginginterests,shehasalsodevelopedaspecialinterestininstitutionsoftheglobalsouth, 10 whichis whywearedelightedthatJacquieacceptedourchallengetowritethe currentvolumeforthisseries.

Thebookexudesauthorityyetisaccessible.Asreaderswillquickly becomeaware,thebookisaninvaluableresourceandclearlydeserves tobereadbyallinterestedinthehistory,politics,andlawofglobal governance.Weheartilyrecommendit;and,asalways,wewelcome commentsfromreaders.

ThomasG.Weiss,TheCUNYGraduateCenter,NewYork,USA RordenWilkinson,UniversityofManchester,UK August2008

Acknowledgments

Becauseofaheavyscheduleofteaching,research,andconsulting,I couldnothavewrittenthisbookwithoutthehelpofmyverypatient assistant,OumarGueye,whospentmanyhoursinlibrariesandonline, searchingforrelevanthistoricalmaterial,andnevercomplainingwhen Isenthimbacktorecovermoredocumentation.Iwouldalsoliketo thankPaulAdoghame,amemberofmyinformalnetworkofglobal southscholars,fordebatingwithmecertainideasaboutAfricanintegration.ThestudentsinmyPhDandMAclassesattheGraduate SchooloftheCityUniversityofNewYorkandatTheCityCollege respectivelycontributed(unwittingly!)tothisvolumethroughtheirstimulatingdiscussions.ThanksarealsoduetoThomasG.Weissand RordenWilkinsonforaskingmetodothevolumeinthe firstplace, andfortheirutmostpatiencewithmethroughallthedelays,notto mentiontheirhelpfuleditorialcomments.Finally,asalways,Imust acknowledgethelogisticalhelpprovidedbymyhusbandJeff,aswellas theassistanceofmysonsJustinandJeremy,bothofwhomhelpedto accessmaterials,whenIbeggedthemtodoso,alwaysatthelast minute,attheUniversityofNorthCarolinaandtheUniversityof Michiganlibrariesrespectively.

Abbreviations

ACPAfrican,Caribbean,andPacificGroup

AECAfricanEconomicCommunity

AfDBAfricanDevelopmentBank

AFESDArabFundforEconomicandSocialDevelopment

ALADI AsociaciónLatinoamericanadeIntegración (Latin AmericanIntegrationAssociation)

ALALC ÁreaLatinoamericanodeLibreComercio (Latin AmericanFreeTradeArea)

ALBA AlternativaBolivarianaparaAmérica,Bolivarian AlternativeforAmerica

AMUArabMahgrebUnion

ANCOMAndeanCommunity

APECAsiaPacificEconomicCooperation(Forum)

APTAAsiaPacificTradeAgreement

ARFAsianRegionalForum

ASEANAssociationofSoutheastAsianNations

AUAfricanUnion

BADEAArabBankforEconomicDevelopment

BIMSTECBayofBengalInitiativeforMulti-SectoralTechnical andEconomicCooperation

CACMCentralAmericanCommonMarket

CAN CommunidadAndina (CommunityofAndeanNations)

CARIFTACaribbeanFreeTradeArea

CARICOMCaribbeanCommunity

CDBCaribbeanDevelopmentBank

CEAO CommunautéÉconomiquedel’Afriquedel’Ouest (West AfricanEconomicCommunity)

CEDEAO CommunautéÉconomiquedesÉtatsdel”Afriquede l’Ouest (EconomicCommunityofWestAfrica)

CEEAC CommunautéÉconomiquedesÉtatsdel’Afrique Centrale (EconomicCommunityofCentralAfricanStates)

CEMAC CommunautéÉconomiqueetMonetairedel’Afrique Centrale (CentralAfricanEconomicandMonetary Community)

CEN-SADCommunityofSahelo-SaharanStates

CEPGL CommunautéÉconomiquedesPaysdesGrandsLacs (GreatLakesEconomicCommunity)

COMESACommonMarketforEastandSouthernAfrica

CSSDCAConferenceonSecurity,Stability,Development,and CooperationinAfrica

EACEastAfricanCommunity

ECCASEconomicCommunityofCentralAfricanStates

ECOMOGECOWASCeasefireMonitoringandObserverGroup

ECOWASEconomicCommunityofWestAfricanStates

ESAFEnhancedStructuralAdjustmentFacility(ofIMF)

GAGeneralAssemblyoftheUN

GABGeneralAgreementstoBorrow

GATSGeneralAgreementonTradeinServices

GCCGulfCooperationCouncil

GSPGeneralizedSystemofPreferences

GSTPGlobalSystemofTradePreferencesamongdeveloping countries

G24IntergovernmentalGroupofTwenty-Fouron InternationalMonetaryAffairsandDevelopment

G77Groupof77

HIPCHighlyIndebtedPoorCountries

IDBInter-AmericanDevelopmentBank

IDAInternationalDevelopmentAssociation

IMFInternationalMonetaryFund

IGADIntergovernmentalAuthorityforDevelopment

IGADDIntergovernmentalAuthorityonDroughtand Development(nowIGAD)

IsDBIslamicDevelopmentBank

LAFTALatinAmericanFreeTradeArea

LAIALatinAmericanIntegrationAssociation

LASLeagueofArabStates

MDGsMillenniumDevelopmentGoals

MERCOSUR/MERCOSUL MercadoComúndelSur (Southern CommonMarket)

NAFTANorthAmericanFreeTradeAgreement

NAMNon-AlignedMovement

NEPADNewPartnershipforAfrica’sDevelopment

OAPECOrganizationofArabPetroleumExportingCountries

OASOrganizationofAmericanStates

OAUOrganizationofAfricanUnity

ODAOfficialDevelopmentAssistance

ODECA OrganizacióndeEstadosCentroamericanos (OrganizationofCentralAmericanStates)

OECDOrganizationforEconomicCooperationand Development

OICOrganizationoftheIslamicConference

OPECOrganizationofPetroleumExportingCountries

PACERPacificAgreementonCloserRelations

PAFMESCAPan-AfricanFreedomMovementforEast,Central,and SouthernAfrica

PARLACENCentralAmericanParliament

PARLATINOLatinAmericanParliament

PICTAPacificIslandCountriesTradeAgreement

PIFPacificIslandsForum

PRGFPovertyReductionandGrowthFacility(oftheIMF)

PTAPreferentialTradeAreaforEasternandSouthern AfricanStates

RECRegionalEconomicCommunity(oftheAEC)

REPAC RéseaudesParlementairesdelaCEEAC (Networkof ParliamentariansofCEEAC)

SACUSouthernAfricanCustomsUnion

SADCSouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunity

SADCCAfricanDevelopmentCoordinationConference

SAARCSouthAsianAssociationforRegionalCooperation

SELA SistemaEconómicoLatinoamericanoydelCaribe (Latin AmericanandCaribbeanEconomicSystem)

SICA SistemadelaIntegraciónCentroamericana (Central AmericanIntegrationSystem)

SIECA SecretaríadeIntegraciónEconómicaCentroamericana (SecretariatforCentralAmericanEconomic Integration)

SPARTECASouthPacificRegionalTradeandEconomicAgreement

SPFSouthPacificForum

TNCTransnationalCorporation

UAM UnionAfricaineetMalgache (AfricanandMalagasy Union)

UDEAC UnionDouanièreetÉconomiquedeL’AfriqueCentrale (CustomsandEconomicUnionofCentralAfrica)

Abbreviations

UEMOA UnionÉconomiqueetMonétaireOuest-Africaine (West AfricanEconomicandMonetaryUnion)

UNUnitedNationsOrganisation

UNASUR/UNASULUnionofSouthAmericanNations

UNCTADUnitedNationsConferenceonTradeandDevelopment

UNECLACUnitedNationsEconomicCommissionforLatin AmericaandtheCaribbean

UNESCAPUnitedNationsEconomicandSocialCommissionfor AsiaandthePacific

WAEMUWestAfricanEconomicandMonetaryUnion

WTOWorldTradeOrganization

Introduction

Multilateralismandtheglobalsouth

Whileabilateralrelationshipbetweenanytwocountriesisclearly enteredintoinordertoproducesomedirect,tangible,military,economic,orculturalgain,thebenefitstobederivedfromastate’sparticipationinmultilateralarrangementsareoftenfarlessobvious. Especiallywhenresourcesarescarce,decisionmakerswilloften wonderifthetimeandmoneyspentattheUnitedNationsorin regionalorganizationsiswellspent,andwhetherthepursuitofthe collectiveglobalorregionalinterestwillpresentunacceptablelimitationsandbarrierstothesatisfactionoftheircountry’sprimarydevelopmentalandsecurityambitions.

Ascanbeseenfromacursoryexaminationofthe Yearbookof InternationalOrganizations, 1 thecountriesoftheglobalsouthtendto bemultilateralists,ifmultilateralismismeasuredintermsofmembershipininternationalorganizations.Indeedoneofthetenetsofthe comparativeforeignpolicyliteraturethatproliferatedinthe1970swas thatsmall eithersmall-sizedorsimply “developing”—statesaremore focusedthantheirlargercounterpartsonparticipationininternational andregionalorganizations.2 Whyisthisso?Whatdothesecountries expecttogainfromjoiningandcreatinginternationalorganizationsof variouskinds?Istheirmotivationanydifferentfromthemotivationsof thedevelopedcountries?Theanswer,aswillbeseen,is both yesand no;but first,weneedtoclarifywhatismeantbytheterm “global south” itself.

Theglobalsouth

The “globalsouth” orsometimes “thesouth” hasforsometimebeen thepreferredtermforwhatusedtobecalledthe “thirdworld.” Yet, like “thirdworld,” thetermisnotdescriptivelyrigorous,andmustbe usedelastically.Theterm “thirdworld” evolved,sinceitscoinageby

theFrenchmanAlfredSauvyin1952,asareferencetothatblocof nationsthatprofessednonalignmentornon-involvementintheantagonismsbetweenthe(Western)democratic firstworldandthecommunistsecondworld.Althoughthisinterpretationisthepredominantone, itshouldbenotedthatMaoZedong,whosoughttomakeChinaa leaderofthethirdworld,hadaslightlydifferentview:tohim,the first worldcomprisedthetwo “imperialist” powers(theUSSRandUnited States)andthesecondworldJapan,Canada,andEurope.Heidentified thethirdworldassimplythosepeople andbydefaultcountries that possessedtruerevolutionarypotential.

Bothinterpretationsoftheterm “thirdworld,” however,sharedthe following: “thirdworld” referredtotheAfricans,Asians,andLatin Americans,thatisthepeopleofthecountrieslocatedroughlyinthree southerncontinentsandsharingahistoryofunderdevelopmentand colonialism.Almostallofthesepopulationswerealsomultiethnicand multicultural.3 Commonhistoriesandtraitsgeneratedpostcolonial modernizingupheavalsinmostofthesesocietiesbetweenthe1960s andthe1980s,andattheinternationallevel,thiswastranslatedaswell intoacommonefforttoaltertheinternationalrulesofthegameeconomicallyaswellaspolitically.TheNorth –Southconflictbasedon developmentdifferencesbecameintertwinedwiththemoreprominent East–Westideologicaldivideasthe “West” and “East” bothcompeted tograntfavorstotheirrespectivepoliticalalliesinthesouth.

Theterm “thirdworld,” aswellasitssuccessorthe “globalsouth, ” shouldnotbeequatedwiththemembershipoftheNon-Aligned Movement(NAM)becausenotallthirdworldcountriesjoinedthe NAM.(Incidentally,theNAMalsohadEuropeanmembership,with YugoslaviaandCyprusbeingfoundingmembers,andMaltabecoming amemberin1973.)TheplaceofChinainthethirdworldhasalsolong beenthesubjectofdebate.SomeobserversusedtohighlightChina’ s nuclearstatusasacriteriondifferentiatingitfromtherestofthethird world,butIndiaandlater,Pakistan,becamemembersofthenuclear club.AsounderargumentagainstviewingChinaasathirdworld memberisthatitisaglobalpowerthatbelongstotheexclusiveclubof stateswithvetopowerintheUNSecurityCouncil.Ontheotherhand, Chinashareswiththethirdworldmanytraits,includingrelativeeconomicunderdevelopmentandtheexperienceofimperialism.Forthese reasons,Chinahaslongplayedahighlysupportiveleadershiprolein thethirdworld.Formostpurposes,therefore,itsufficestonotethat Chinacontinuestoadoptpositionsinglobalrelationsthataregenerallysympathetictotheglobalsouth,particularlyintheeconomic spherewhereitpointedlyalliesitselfwiththeGroupof77(G77),the

developingcountrycaucuswithintheUnitedNationsConferenceon TradeandDevelopment(UNCTAD).Innoneoftheinstitutions describedinthisbookisChinaanintegralmember.YetChinaisan influentialobserverinmostofthem.

Thefadingoftheterm “thirdworld” canbedatedtotheglobal changesofthe1990sthateliminatedthesecondworldasananalytical concept,butasfarbackasthe1970s,dissatisfactionhadalreadysurfacedoverthestagnationandinequalitythatcouldbereadintoterms suchas “thirdworld” and “lessdeveloped.” Thustheterm “south” begantoappearmorefrequentlyinUNdocumentationbythe1970s. Intheeconomicarena,thepreferredterm “developing” wasadopted inthe1970soverthemorestatic “lessdeveloped.” Ofcoursethe “developing” werealwaysadifferentiatedgroup ranginginincome andsocialdevelopmentfromuppermiddletolowincomeandfrom highlytoleastdeveloped.

Bythe1980s,thenewlyindustrializingEastAsiancountrieswere reapingtherewardsofrobusttradeandwerebeingemulatedbyother leadingregionalnations.Bythe1990s,withtheglobalpushforliberalization, “thirdworld” finallylostitsessence.Theeconomicand politicaldiversityoftheAfro-Asian-LatinAmericangroup alwaysan issuebutonecoveredupbylargerconcerns begantoappearmore sharplyinthepost–coldwarworldastheoverarchinganti-imperial, nonalignedprioritiesfaded.The “globalsouth” hasnowbecomean acceptabletermtorefertothesenationsinarelativelyneutralwaythat stillrecognizestheirroughgeographicalstatusaswellasageneral senseofcommonglobalproblemsandaims.Torecognizeacontinuing commonalityisnottodenythatthedifferentiationamongsouthern countrieskeepsgrowing:oneneedonlylookattheproliferationof categoriesdevisedbyinternationalagenciestoaddresstheneedsof specificgroupsofcountries,including “countriesintransition,” (for thoseformerEasternBlocaswellasdevelopingcountriesmovingfrom commandtomarketeconomies),advanceddevelopingcountries, highlyindebtedpoorcountries,andsmallislanddevelopingstates. AlthoughmostofthecountriesintransitionareinEasternEurope,not thesouth,theyshareanumberofeconomiccommonalitieswith developingnationsandsomehaveevenjoinedsoutherninternational institutions.Despitethesenuances,theterm “globalsouth” isauseful handlebywhichtoanalyzeagroupofcountriesthat notwithstanding theforcesofglobalizationandtheaspirationsofliberalismandforms ofcosmopolitanism continuetoseetheirproblems,andtoconstruct theirnarratives,quitedifferentlyfromthoseofthedevelopednationsof Europe,NorthAmerica,andAsia.

Whatdoestheglobalsouthwantfrominstitutions?

Historically,ontheonehand,thecreationofinternationalorganizationswasaresponsetothemostpracticalofneeds.Thusoneofthe earliest,theEuropeanCommissionfortheControloftheDanube,was createdin1856onlytodealwithnavigationissuesregardingthe DanubeRiver.Theemergenceofglobalorganizationssuchasthe InternationalTelecommunicationsUnionandtheUniversalPostal Unioninthelate1880srespondedtotheneedforworldwideregulation ofcommerceandcommunications.Inotherwords,organizationswere createdtopermitstatestomanagethegritofinternationalaffairs, especiallycommercialaffairs.Notsurprisingly,then,themoreinterdependentnationsbecame,themoreinstitutionswereneededto manageandregulatetheirinteraction.

Thetheoryoffunctionalismemergedinthe1930stocapturethis practicalandrationaldimension,whilealsoadheringtoaliberal idealinexpectingtechnicalcooperationtospilloverintothepolitical realm.Functionalistsassertedthatthedevelopmentofanetworkof technicalorganizationswouldbindstatesinsuchawayastomakewar unacceptable.However,therenewalofwar(thatis,theonsetofWorld WarII)putpaidtofunctionalisthopes,andledtoareconceptualizationoffunctionalisminthe1960sintheformofneofunctionalism. Neofunctionalistsrecognizedboththetrendtowardregionalismthat hademerged firstinEuropeinthelate1950s,andtheinseparabilityof politicsandeconomics.Asinterdependencegrew,sodidtheinstitutionalnetworksthatcementedit,andsodidthestudyofwhystates, thoughpresumablypower-consciousandself-interestedaccordingto thedominantrealistschoolofthought,stillfounditsousefulto engageincollectiveaction.

Intheirfocusonthepotentialforcooperationamongstatesunder anarchy,theneoliberals,whobecameprominentinthe1980s,pointed outthatinstitutionsareimportanttoself-interestedstatesbecausethey tendtobeinformation-rich(thusreducinguncertainty)andbecause theyreducetransactioncosts.Focusingonregimes(definedassetsof practicesandexpectations),RobertKeohaneelaboratesthelatterby pointingoutthatnotonlydoregimesmakeviolationsofagreements andrulesmorecostlybutinamoremundanesense,theymakeit cheaperforgovernmentstogettogethertonegotiateagreements(by providingmeetingforumsandestablishingprinciplesthatdonotneed tobeconstantlyrenegotiated),andtheyallowfortheclusteringof issuessothatside-paymentscanbefacilitated.4 KennethAbbottand DuncanSnidaladdthatthereasonswhyallstates,includingpowerful

ones,joininternationalorganizations(IOs)arebecause “thevalue of … [IO]functionsoutweighsthecosts,notablytheresultinglimitson unilateralaction.”5 Thatis,givingupsomeoftheirsovereigntymaybe efficaciousforstatesifIOsprovidesuchpositivefunctionsas “facilitatingthenegotiationandimplementationofagreements,resolving disputes,managingconflicts,carryingoutoperationalactivitieslike technicalassistance,elaboratingnorms,[and]shapinginternational discourse …” Moreover,

IOsallowforthecentralizationofcollectiveactivitiesthrougha concreteandstableorganizationalstructureandasupportive administrativeapparatus.Theseincreasetheefficiencyofcollective activitiesandenhancetheorganization’sabilitytoaffectthe understandings,environment,andinterestsofstates IOindependence … canincreaseefficiencyandaffectthelegitimacyof individualandcollectiveactions.6

NotonlydoIOsprovideefficientandlegitimatemechanismsforcollectiveaction,buttheyalsoallowstatestoelaboratenormsandshape internationaldiscourse,astheauthorspointout.Otherspointoutthat theyalsogeneratenewknowledgeandideas.ErnstHaas,forexample, pointstothewayinwhichchangesinscienti ficknowledgehaveinfluencedthewaypoliticsisconducted.Forexample,henotesthatthe WorldBankchangeditsbasic “trickledown” philosophyofdevelopmenttoonefocusingonbasicneedswheneconomistsandotherdevelopmentspecialistsprofferednewtechniquestohelpthepoormore directly.7 Inturn,IOsexposememberstothesenewideas,anexposure thatisparticularlyimportantforstatesthatarepoorinboth financial andhumanresources.Theyarethusabletolearnaboutinnovations andparticipateaswellindebatesanddiscussionsaboutnewwaysof thinkinganddoing.Muchoftheliteraturealsoassumesthatinternationalinstitutions socialize statesintoappropriateformsofbehavior,in essencemakingthemgoodcitizensoftheglobalcommunity.8 While thesuccessofsuchsocializationvaries,dependingparticularlyon domesticreceptivity,institutionscancertainlybeagentsofchangeat alllevels.

Theserationalandnormativereasonsforjoininginstitutionsapply totheglobalsouthstatesaswellastoallotherstates.However,there arealsopeculiarreasonswhyglobalsouthstatesputfaithininternational institutions.ScholarshavenotedtheparticularimportanceofIOsto smaller,weakerstates.IOsallowthemtopooltheirresourcesand achieveeconomiesofscale.Oneofthemostobviousexamplesisatthe

UnitedNationswhereglobalsouthparticipationnotonlyprovidestangibleeconomicandsocialgainsbutevenmoreimportantly,provides diplomatic advantagesinallowingthemacost-effectivewaytohavea voiceinworldaffairs.Theforumalsoservesaverypracticalpurpose:it isaplacetomeetthediplomatsoftheworldwithouttheadditional expenditureofofficialvisitsandresidentdiplomaticmissions.

Thereisanotherimportantuseforinternationalinstitutions:IOs allowthelesspowerfulstatesoftheworldtobuildcoalitionsagainst thestrongercountries.AsKeohaneandJosephNyenotedinthe1970s, atimewhentheglobalsouthhadrisentoexceptionalprominence,

Internationalorganizationsarefrequentlycongenialinstitutions forweakstates.Theone-state-one-votenormoftheUnitedNations systemfavorscoalitionsofthesmallandpowerless.Secretariats areoftenresponsivetoThirdWorlddemands.Furthermore,the substantivenormsofmostinternationalorganizations,asthey havedevelopedovertheyears,stresssocialandeconomicequityas wellastheequalityofstates

Internationalorganizationsalsoallowsmallandweakstatesto pursuelinkagestrategies 9

“Linkagestrategies” referstotheuseoforganizationalchannelsby globalsouthnationstodevelopacollectiveidentityamongstateswhich sharesimilarcircumstancesandgoals,andtotransformthisidentity intocounterdependentstances.Foralthoughrealistinternationalrelationsscholarshavestressedanarchyasthemaindeterminingcharacteristicofstatebehaviorintheinternationalarena,globalsouth academicsaswellaspolicymakershavetendedtofocusontheimpact ofahierarchicalinternationalsysteminwhichthesouthernstatesare subordinatetotheirnortherncounterparts.ThusJohanGaltung describedtheinternationalsystemofthelate1960sas “feudo-imperial” withperipheralstatesinteractingalmostexclusivelywithmetropolitan centersandonunequalterms.10 Prominentneo-Marxistacademic approacheslaterdevelopedinthesouth,namelythedependencyand theworld-systemsapproaches,have,notsurprisingly,takenhierarchy asacentralexplanatoryfactor;11 andcontemporarycriticaltheorists haveemphasizedthehegemonicstructureoftheinternationalorder, theunequalmaterial,ideational,andsocialfoundationsofglobal relationsaggravatedinmanywaysbyglobalization,andthustheneed forsweeping(emancipatory)change.12 Evenneoliberalistsrecognize thattheinternationalregimesthatfosterglobalcooperationaredeficient bycosmopolitanmoralstandards;theydonotfocusonredistributing

resourcesequallyorjustlyacrosstheworld.13 Inthisrespect,then, certainformsofmultilateralismhavebeenemployedbytheglobalsouth asastrategytocountertheadverseeffectsofhierarchy,hegemony, inequality,andexclusion.

Multilateralism,whetherattheglobalorattheregionallevel, enablesglobalsouthstatestosharestrategicinformationandideas,to drawglobalattentiontotheirparticularconcerns,toreducethecosts orpenaltiesfornoncooperationwithdominantnorthernpartnersvia theassumptionofcollectivestances(whatcanbedescribedasan instrumentalorconvenientsolidarity),andtofacilitateadoptionof alternativecoursesofactionthatwouldbelesslikelytoworkifstates adoptedthemsingly.Regionalismcanbeseenasaparticularformof multilateralisminwhichculturalandgeographiccommonalitiesshould theoreticallyallowforevengreatercooperationamongglobalsouth states.

Inthe1960sandearly1970s,withtheWesternandsocialistblocsin continualcompetitionandthenumberofindependentglobalsouth nationsgrowing,theabilityoftheglobalsouthtobuildastrongcoalitionfacilitatedgradualchangesinexistinginternationalrulesand regimes.Developingstateswereabletobringaboutinstitutional changethroughtheuseofconfrontationtacticsthatgrewoutofa consciousnessoftheircommoninequalityandvulnerability.Asdiscussedinthenextchapter,fromtheBandungconferenceof1955 throughthemid-1980s,theglobalsouthhelpedinthiswaytolegitimizenewnorms(forexample,anticolonialismandantiracialism)and toreformmanyinternationalinstitutions.Forexample,itwassouthern pressurethatledtotheincreaseinthemembershipofboththeUN SecurityCouncilandtheUNEconomicandSocialCouncil(ECOSOC). Moreover,asdiscussedinthenexttwochapters,theglobalsouth nationscollaboratedwithexistingUNagenciesandalsoestablished newgroupings(notablytheirownGroupof77aswellasregional integrationarrangements)intheirsearchforfreshresponsestothe problemsofunderdevelopment.

Bythe1970s,however,theinternationalsystemwasmovingaway fromthestrictfeudo-imperialhierarchydescribedbyGaltung,and towardanincipientinterdependence.Thesuccessfulactionsofthe OrganizationofPetroleumExportingCountries(OPEC)encouraged otherformsofcartelizationinthesouth,andthenationsofthesouth begantoseesomesmallsuccessintheirpromotionofdiversification strategiesandsouth–southcooperation.However,the1970swerealso atimeofincreaseddifferentiationamongthesoutherncountriesthemselves.OPECnationsvaultedintoawealthiercategorythanmostother

nationsofthesouth;theAsiannewlyindustrializingcountriesmoved uptothe “semi-periphery”;andvariousregionalstateswereelevated to “middlepower” status.

Thedi fferentiationamongthesupposedlysimilarlessdeveloped unitsofthesouthcontinuedtobereinforcedduringthe1980swhen manysoutherncountriessufferedfromhighdebtandsevereeconomic decline,andreacheditspeakinthepost–coldwar1990swhendevelopingcountriesfoundthemselvescompetingvigorouslyamongthemselvesfortrade,aid,andforeigninvestmentastheysoughttoliberalize inaccordancewithnewsystemicpriorities.Whileliberalizationand globalization aproductofincreasedinformationalandtechnological interdependence broughtbenefitstothemoreindustrializedand competitiveeconomies,weakereconomieswerethreatenedwithmarginalization.Bilateralandbi-regionalarrangementsbetweennorthern andsouthernnationswerestrengthenedaswerenonstatelinkages,thus blurringthepreviousglobalhierarchyandhamperingthesouth’ s effortstomaintainasolidfront.Inthepost–coldwarworld,absentthe glueofanti-communism,thenortherncountriestoohaveassumed differentiatedstancesonpoliticalandeconomicissues,evenwhile continuingtoshareacommoncommitmenttothebasicnormsof politicalandeconomicliberalism.

Thesechangeshavehadtheirimpactonglobalsouthmultilateralism. Inparticular,whilethereremainissuesofhierarchyanddependence thatintheeyesofsouthernnationsneedtobeaddressedcollectively (forexample,thesouthisveryconcernedaboutthedemocraticdeficit intheUnitedNations,aboutnewformsofconditionalityimposedon tradeandaid,andaboutthelackofagreementbythenorthonspecial anddifferentialtreatmentfordevelopingcountriesinglobaltrade negotiations),broadmultilateralapproachesarenowseenasless effectivethanregionalapproachesthattakeintoaccounttheparticular anddifferingcircumstancesofeachgroupofnations,aswellasthe potentialforvariedpartnershipswithlike-mindedgroupsofnorthern nations.

Inthefollowingchapters,then,notonlyarethemainolderglobal southinstitutionsdescribed,butalsothechangingapproachesthat thesehavehadtoadopt,aswellasthenewerfaceofregionalism.It shouldbenotedthatalthoughthepolicyliteraturetendstotreat organizationsandinstitutionsasnear-synonymous,theacademicliteraturehasdifferentiatedtheseinviewingorganizationsas “palpable entitieswithheadquartersandletterheads,votingprocedures,and generouspensionplans,”14 whereasinstitutionsaremorebroadlyconceived,basedontheirsociologicalmeaning,as “persistentandconnected

setsofrules,formalandinformal,thatprescribebehavioralroles,constrainactivity,andshapeexpectations.”15 Whilealltheorganizations describedherearephysicalentities,thebookalsoaimstodescribethe keyrulesandnormsthatprovideabasisforcollectiveidentitiesand behaviorwithintheseentities.Similarly,althoughthetraditionalview ofmultilateralismasthecoordinationofrelationsamongthreeor morestatesisretained,almostalltheinstitutionsdiscussedherealso meetamorestringentcriterionofincorporatingnormsbasedon expectationsofreciprocatedconduct,notsimplybilateralintent.16

Socialconstructivistsremindusthatinternationalstructuresarenot stagnant;theyaretheproductofsocial,notjustmaterial,processes, andshouldbestudiedinrelationshiptothedevelopmentofinternationalsocietyandtheideasandnormsthatinfluencestateidentity, interestsandpreferences,andultimatelybehavior.17 Everyorganization orinstitutiondescribedinthebookistheproductofanidea,sometimesindeedabroadvision,forsomelevelofunity,sharedeither amongthenear-universeofglobalsouthnationsoramongappropriate historicallyandculturallylinkedgroupsandsubgroups.Howtheidea hasbeenoperationalizedacrosstimeisthemajorfocusofthedescriptionsandanalysesthatfollow.

Planofthebook

Thisbookdealsonlywiththeorganizationsandinstitutionsthathave beenestablishedbystateactors.Theimportantandgrowingroleof nonstateactors,inparticularnongovernmentalorganizations,cannot forreasonsofspacebedealtwithhere.Theinstitutionsconsideredare dividedorganizationallyintermsofboththebreathofmembership andofgoals(political/multifunctionalorsinglefunction).Firstthetwo maintricontinentalpoliticalandeconomicgroupings,theNAMand theG77,arediscussedinChapters1and2.Bothdatetothe1960s, reachingtheheightoftheirinfluenceinthe1970swhentheglobal southcountriesengagedinvigorouspromotionofareformistpostcolonialagenda.Bothorganizationshavebeenforcedtoadaptsince thentoamoreconservativeglobalenvironment.InChapter3,athird tricontinentalorganizationisadded,butwhatdifferentiatesthisone fromthe firsttwoisthatitisasinglefunctiongrouping.The OrganizationofPetroleumExportingCountriesbeganwithsimilar transformational(orcounterdependent)aimsastheNAMandG77, andsomeofitsmemberswouldstillliketoseetheorganizationinthis light.Ithasinsteadbecomeamarket-orientedgrouping,onewhose membersareincreasinglycognizantoftheneedtoworkwithconsumer

Another random document with no related content on Scribd:

further information. The London Horticultural Society mentioned the variety as long ago as in 1831. Another Mr. Pond, a nurseryman in Massachusetts, grew a variety very similar in appearance to the English plum and permitted his name to be given it to the great confusion of the nomenclature of the two. The Hungarian prune of the Pacific Coast is Pond, why so-called does not appear; with this as with several other plums the Pacific Coast fruit-growers persist in using a name known to have been wrongly applied to an old and well-known variety elsewhere called rightly. Oswego, a supposed seedling grown in Oswego, New York, is identical with the Pond as tested by this Experiment Station and by local growers. The American Pomological Society placed this fruit on its catalog list in 1856.

Tree of medium size, vigorous, upright, hardy, variable in productiveness; branches light gray, smooth, with small, raised lenticels; branchlets of medium thickness and length, with internodes of average length, greenish-red changing to brownish-drab, dull, sparingly pubescent, with inconspicuous small lenticels; leaf-buds large, long, conical, free; leaf-scars plump, often much enlarged at the apex of the twigs.

Leaves somewhat folded backward, oval, two and one-quarter inches wide, four inches long, thick, leathery; upper surface dark green, finely pubescent, rugose, with a grooved midrib; lower surface silvery-green, pubescent; apex abruptly pointed or acute, base abrupt, margin crenate or serrate, with small dark glands; petiole five-eighths inch long, thick, pubescent, tinged red, with one or two globose, yellowish glands variable in size, usually on the stalk.

Season of bloom intermediate in time and length; flowers appearing after the leaves, one and five-sixteenths inches across, white; borne in thin clusters on lateral spurs and buds, singly or in pairs; pedicels thirteensixteenths inch long, pubescent, greenish; calyx-tube green, campanulate, pubescent; calyx-lobes broad, obtuse, lightly pubescent on both surfaces, margins with few glands and hairs, reflexed; petals roundish, crenate, tapering to short, broad claws; filaments seven-sixteenths inch long; pistil glabrous, equal to or shorter than the stamens.

Fruit late, season short; two inches by one and three-quarters inches in size, obovate or oval, frequently with a slight neck, halves equal; cavity shallow, narrow, abrupt; suture very shallow, often a line; apex roundish; color varies from reddish-purple to purplish-red, overspread with thick

bloom; dots numerous, small, reddish-brown, obscure, larger in size but fewer in number towards the base; stem thick, seven-eighths inch long, heavily pubescent, adhering well to the fruit; skin tough, separating readily; flesh attractive golden-yellow, not very juicy, fibrous, firm, of average sweetness, mild, not highly flavored; fair in quality; stone semifree to free, one and one-sixteenths inches by nine-sixteenths inch in size, long-oval, flattened, the surfaces roughened and deeply pitted, tapering towards the base and apex; ventral suture heavily furrowed, with a distinct but not prominent wing; dorsal suture usually widely and deeply grooved.

POOLE PRIDE

Prunusmunsoniana

1. Am. Pom. Soc. Rpt. 108. 1885. 2. Cornell Sta. Bul. 38:50. 1892. 3. Ia. Hort. Soc. Rpt. 334. 1894. 4. Wis. Sta. Bul. 63:24, 53. 1897. 5. Ibid. 87:15. 1901. 6. Waugh Plum Cult. 186. 1901. 7. Budd-Hansen Am. Hort. Man. 299. 1903. 8. Ohio Sta. Bul. 162:245 fig., 256, 257. 1905.

Kroh 1, 6. Kroh 3, 7. Poole 2, 7. Poole 6. Poole’s Pride 3, 4, 5. Poole’s Pride 2, 6, 7.

As compared with other native plums growing on the grounds at this Station, Poole Pride has considerable merit. It is very attractive in appearance, it seems to have all the characters of a long-keeping and a good-shipping sort of its species and the trees are large, vigorous, hardy, healthy and productive. It is, however, lacking in the very important character of flavor though the texture of the flesh is all that could be desired. Its very peculiar flavor, incomparable with any other plum or fruit, while disagreeable to the writer, might be liked by some. The flesh of this plum is so transparent that the pit can be readily seen when the skin is removed. To those growing native plums, Poole Pride is recommended for trial.

This variety was raised by P. H. Kroh, Anna, Illinois, and was exhibited by him under the name Kroh at the American Pomological Society meeting in 1885. Three years later the same plum was introduced by Stark Brothers, Louisiana, Missouri, under the name of

Poole’s Pride. The latter name has been so much more widely used that it has been retained even though the former is correct according to the rule of priority.

Tree large, vigorous, open and round-topped, hardy, productive, healthy; branches rough, zigzag, with few thorns, dark ash-gray, with numerous, small lenticels; branchlets twiggy, slender, above medium in length, with short internodes, greenish-red changing to light chestnut-red, glabrous, with numerous, very conspicuous, large, raised lenticels; leafbuds small, short, obtuse, plump, appressed.

Leaves folded upward, ovate or obovate, peach-like, one and threeeighths inches wide, three and one-half inches long, thin and leathery; upper surface dull red late in the season, smooth, glossy, with a narrow groove on the midrib; lower surface lightly pubescent; apex taper-pointed, base rather abrupt, margin finely crenate, with small dark glands; petiole seven-eighths inch long, slender, hairy, light purplish-red, with from one to four small, globose, reddish-brown glands on the stalk.

Blooming season late and long; flowers appearing after the leaves, fiveeighths inch across, white; borne in clusters on short lateral spurs and buds; pedicels nine-sixteenths inch long, very slender, glabrous, green; calyx-tube greenish, campanulate, glabrous; calyx-lobes narrow, obtuse, heavily pubescent within and along the margin which is serrate and covered with reddish glands, erect; petals small, ovate or roundish, crenate, tapering into long pubescent claws; anthers yellowish; filaments five-sixteenths inch long; pistil glabrous, shorter than the stamens.

Fruit early, season very long; one inch in diameter, roundish-oval, not compressed, halves equal; cavity very shallow and narrow; suture a distinct line; apex roundish; color clear, dark, currant-red, with thin bloom; dots few, large, light russet, conspicuous, clustered about the apex; stem slender, five-eighths inch long, glabrous, but overspread with a grayish bloom, adhering to the fruit; skin thin, tough, separating from the pulp; flesh semi-transparent, dark amber-yellow, very juicy, fibrous, tender and melting, sweet, with a strong, peculiar flavor not pleasant; of fair quality; stone adhering, five-eighths inch by three-eighths inch in size, long-oval, slightly flattened, compressed at the base, pointed at the apex, roughish; ventral suture blunt, faintly ridged; dorsal suture acute, entire.

POTTAWATTAMIE

Prunusmunsoniana

1. Ia. Hort. Soc. Rpt. 287. 1887. 2. Pop. Gard. 3:27 fig. 1887. 3. Cornell Sta. Bul. 38:64. 86. 1892. 4. Mich Sta. Bul. 123:20. 1895. 5. Ia. Sta. Bul. 31:346. 1895. 6. Wis. Sta. Bul. 63:53. 1897. 7. Am. Pom. Soc. Cat. 25.

POTTAWATTAMIE

1897. 8. Ohio Sta. Bul. 113:156. 1899. 9. Ia. Sta. Bul. 46:287. 1900. 10. Waugh Plum Cult. 199 fig. 1901. 11. Ga. Sta. Bul. 67:279. 1904.

The plum under notice is possibly of greater cultural value than any other of its species especially for northern latitudes. It is of high quality for a native plum, the texture of the fruit being especially pleasing in eating, and though melting and juicy it keeps and ships very well because of a tough skin. It escapes both the curculio and the brown-rot to a higher degree than most of its kind. The trees, though dwarfish at maturity, are vigorous, productive and among the hardiest of the Munsoniana plums, growing without danger of winter injury to tree or bud as far north as the forty-fourth parallel. Pottawattamie is deservedly one of the best known of the native plums and if varieties of its species are to be grown in New York, is as desirable as any.

Pottawattamie, according to the most authoritative accounts, was taken from Tennessee to Iowa with a lot of Miner trees. It came under the notice of J. B. Rice, Council Bluffs, Iowa, in 1875, and was introduced by him and named after one of the counties of his State.

Tree medium in size, strong and vigorous when young becoming spreading and somewhat dwarfish when older, round-topped, hardy at Geneva, usually productive; branches dark brown, zigzag, thorny, roughened by the numerous, raised lenticels of various sizes which are often narrow and much elongated; branchlets slender, long, with internodes of medium length, greenish-red changing to dark chestnut-red, glabrous, with numerous, conspicuous, large, raised lenticels; leaf-buds small, short, obtuse, free.

Leaves flat or folded upward, lanceolate, peach-like, one and one-eighth inches wide, three and one-quarter inches long, thin; upper surface light green, reddish late in the season, smooth, glossy, with a grooved midrib; lower surface pale green, lightly pubescent along the midrib and larger veins; apex taper-pointed, base abrupt, margin finely serrate or crenate, with small, reddish glands; petiole one inch long, slender, tinged red, thinly pubescent, glandless or with from one to five very small, globose, reddish-yellow glands usually on the stalk.

Blooming season late and long; flowers appearing after the leaves, fiveeighths inch across, creamy-white as the buds unfold changing to whitish,

with a disagreeable odor; borne in clusters from lateral buds, in threes, fours or fives; pedicels five-eighths inch long, very slender, glabrous, greenish; calyx-tube green, broadly obconic, glabrous, calyx-lobes narrow, somewhat acute, pubescent on the inner surface, serrate, with reddish glands and hairy margin, erect; petals small, oval, slightly toothed, narrowly clawed; anthers yellowish; filaments one-quarter inch long; pistil glabrous, shorter than the stamens.

Fruit early, season of medium length; variable in size ranging from seven-eighths inch to one and one-eighth inches in diameter, roundishoval, slightly compressed, halves equal; cavity very shallow and narrow, abrupt; suture indistinct; apex roundish or depressed; color clear currantred, with thin bloom; dots few, medium to large, whitish, somewhat conspicuous, clustered about the apex; stem very slender, three-quarters inch long, glabrous, adhering poorly to the fruit; skin tough, cracking under unfavorable conditions, separating readily; flesh deep yellow, juicy, fibrous, tender and melting, sweet next the skin but sour at the center, of pleasant flavor; fair to good in quality; stone clinging closely, five-eighths inch by three-eighths inch in size, narrow, long-oval, turgid, smooth, flattened and necked at the base, abruptly sharp-tipped at the apex; ventral suture acute, inconspicuous; dorsal suture blunt, faintly grooved.

PURPLE GAGE

Prunusdomestica

1. Pom. Mag. 3:129, Pl. 1830. 2. Lond. Hort. Soc. Cat. 152, 153. 1831. 3. Downing Fr. Trees Am. 308 fig. 127. 1845. 4. Poiteau Pom. Franc. 1. 1846. 5. Thomas Am. Fruit Cult. 339. 1849. 6. Am. Pom. Soc. Cat. 54. 1852. 7. Ann. Pom. Belge 3:71, Pl. 1855. 8. Thompson Gard. Ass’t 519, Pl. 1. 1859. 9. Hogg Fruit Man. 377. 1866. 10. Pom. France 7: No. 9. 1871. 11. Mas Le Verger 6:3 fig. 2. 1866-73. 12. Cat. Cong. Pom. France 367. 1887. 13. Mathieu Nom. Pom. 452. 1889. 14. Guide Prat. 155, 364. 1895.

Blaue Reine-Claude 10, 11, 13 incor., 14. Die Violette Königin Claudia 13. Die Violette Königin Claudie 1. Die Violette Köning Claudie 3. Die Violette oder blaue Renoclode 10, 14. Die Violette oder Blaue Reneclode 11, 13. Purple Gage 2, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14. Prune Reine Claude Violette 4, 10. Reine-Claude Alex. Dumas 14. Reine-Claude Violette 2, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14. Reine-Claude Violette 1, 3, 5, 9, 13. Violet Queen Claude 3, 5. Violet

Gage 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14. Violette Reine-Claude 13. Violet Gage 2. Violette Queen Claude 13. Violetoder Blaue Reneclode 13.

Purple Gage is worthy of attention as one of the best flavored of all purple plums. In all but color of fruit it is a true Gage, to say which is a sufficient characterization as to quality. In size it averages larger than most of the Gages or Reine Claude plums, and in color is a rich dark purple as attractive as any of the purple plums. Another good quality of the fruit is that of hanging to the tree until it shrivels at which time it is richest in flavor. Unfortunately the trees, while averaging very well in other respects, are not productive and the variety cannot be recommended for money-making though it well deserves a place in home orchards.

Purple Gage is a European variety of unknown origin, though in the Catalogue descriptif des fruits adoptes par le Congres pomologiquefor 1887, it is said to have been raised by M. Galopin of Liege, Belgium. As it was not mentioned by Duhamel in his Traite desArbres Fruitiersin 1768, it is thought to have been unknown at that date. English and American authors generally apply the name Purple Gage to this variety but in continental countries the name Reine Claude Violette is most common. It was imported into America early in the last century and in 1852 was added to the recommended list of fruits in the American Pomological Society catalog.

Tree large, vigorous, round-topped, hardy, not very productive; branches numerous, light ash-gray, with few, small, raised lenticels; branchlets thick, above medium in length, with rather short internodes, greenish-red changing to brownish-red, marked with much scarf-skin, glabrous throughout the season, with few, small, slightly-raised lenticels; leaf-buds of medium size and length, conical, appressed; leaf-scars greatly enlarged.

Leaves folded upward, oval, one and three-quarters inches wide, three and one-half inches long, thick, stiff; upper surface dark green, distinctly rugose, lightly pubescent, with a shallow groove on the midrib; lower surface silvery-green, covered with thick pubescence; apex abruptly pointed or acute, base rather abrupt, margin serrate or crenate, eglandular or with small dark glands; petiole three-quarters inch long,

thick, greenish, pubescent, glandless or with one or two rather large, globose, yellowish-green glands variable in position.

Blooming season late, of medium length; flowers appearing with the leaves, nearly one and one-quarter inches across, white; borne from lateral buds, usually singly; pedicels five-eighths inch long, thick, pubescent, greenish; calyx-tube green, campanulate, glabrous; calyxlobes narrow, obtuse, lightly pubescent on both surfaces, glandularserrate, reflexed; petals obovate or oval, crenate, short-clawed; anthers yellow; filaments nearly one-half inch long; pistil glabrous except at the base, shorter than the stamens.

Fruit intermediate in time and length of ripening season; one and onehalf inches by one and three-eighths inches in size, roundish or ovate, slightly compressed, halves equal; cavity shallow, narrow, abrupt; suture very shallow, often a line; apex variable in shape; color dark purple or purplish-black, overspread with thick bloom; dots numerous, russet, conspicuous when the bloom is removed, clustered about the apex; stem five-eighths inch long, thinly pubescent, adhering well to the fruit; skin thin, separating readily; flesh dull yellow, juicy, somewhat fibrous, firm but tender, sweet, of pleasant flavor; very good; stone semi-clinging, seveneighths inch by five-eighths inch in size, irregular-oval, flat, often contracted at the base into a long narrow neck, blunt at the apex, with markedly rough and pitted surfaces; ventral suture swollen, rather wide, distinctly furrowed, often with a prominent wing; dorsal suture with a wide and deep groove.

QUACKENBOSS

QUACKENBOSS

Prunusdomestica

1. Downing Fr. Trees Am. 393. 1857. 2. Cultivator 6:269 fig. 1858. 3. Thomas Am. Fruit Cult. 345. 1867. 4. Downing Fr. Trees Am. 941. 1869. 5. Am. Pom. Soc. Cat. 24. 1871. 6. Mas. Pom. Gen. 2:151, fig. 76. 1873.

7. Barry Fr. Garden 415. 1883. 8. Mich. Sta. Bul. 103:34, fig. 6. 1894. 9. Ont. Fr. Exp. Sta. Rpt. 52. 1895. 10. Cornell Sta. Bul. 131:191, fig. 40 II. 1897. 11. Waugh Plum Cult. 119. 1901. 12. Va. Sta. Bul. 134:44. 1902.

Quackenbos 9, 12.

Though not a leading variety, Quackenboss is a prominent one in the list of commercial sorts for New York. Its fruits possess to a high degree the characters which make a good market plum; they are of large size, averaging nearly an inch and a half in diameter; roundoval, a better shape for the markets than the prune shapes; very prepossessing in color—a handsome, dark purple with heavy bloom; the flesh is tender and juicy with a sweet, pleasant flavor making it one of the good purple plums, though not one of the best in quality. The tree is large, vigorous, hardy, with a round and spreading top. This gives it great bearing capacity but though productive in the Station orchard, the variety does not have the reputation of being fruitful and fails chiefly as a commercial sort for this reason. It is a late-maturing variety and comes on the market at a time when plums are wanted for home canning, the demand for this purpose, for which it is most suitable, helping greatly its sale. The variety has two peculiarities; the petals are comparatively distinct from each other giving the flower, or a tree in flower, an odd appearance; and the leaves are remarkably variable in size.

It is not quite certain when or where this variety first came to notice. C. Reagles, a competent authority, of Schenectady, New York, in describing the Quackenboss for The Cultivator in 1858, says “There is a seedling tree of this identical sort in the garden of Mr. S. C. Groot of this city, which is about thirty years old.” If true, this puts its origin in Schenectady at about 1828. But beyond question a Mr. Quackenboss of Greenbush, New York, introduced the variety, though some years later, and it has taken his name. In 1871, the American Pomological Society placed the Quackenboss on its recommended fruit list.

Tree very large and vigorous, round-topped, hardy, productive; branches numerous, ash-gray, the trunk rough but the limbs smooth, with

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.