Daniel Ranostaj 2014 Portfolio

Portfolio

DANIEL RANOSTAJ B.Arch, University of Houston, 2014

1

2

Daniel Ranostaj

d.ranostaj@gmail.com 713.834.2716 portfolio: www.danielranostaj.com Employment Intern Architect Allen Bianchi Architects May 2013 - May 2014 Houston, Texas In a residential architecture office, providing schematic design, construction documents, 3D modeling, and rendering services. Working with team of 4 taking direction from owner and principal, Allen Bianchi.

Responsibilities: - 3D modeling in Rhinoceros for schematic and design development - Review documents - invoices, AIA contracts, legal documents and client proposals, and construction documents - 2D Drafting with AutoCAD - Participated in client meetings and consultations - Coordination with local governmental agencies Production/Research Analyst The Whitaker Companies July 2012 - April 2013 Houston, Texas Working in an information technology consulting firm with duties that primarily dealt with data collection and research management.

Responsibilities: - Utilize internet tools for research - Utilize social media for marketing purposes - Correspond with clients and candidates - Schedule interviews and interview preps - Review documents - contracts, resumes, legal documents, job descriptions, and references - Data Entry

Education Architecture (B. Arch) Honors in Major, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, May 2014 Undergraduate Honors Thesis Program : “Boundaries : Mexico City�

Magna Cum Laude Architectural focus on urban design with integration of digital processes and sustainability

Software Skills AutoCAD, Vectorworks, Rhinocerous, Adobe Creative Suites CS5 (Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign, Bridge), Artlantis Studio 4, Google Sketchup, Microsoft Office, V-Ray, ArcMap, 3DSMax, ArchiCAD, Autodesk Revit, Grasshopper

Recognition SMART CITY: The Next Generation, AEDES, Southeast Asia, May 2013., published as part of exhibition.

Studio Work selected for college accreditation review : Fall 2010, Spring 2011, Spring 2013 Deans List: Fall 2010, Fall 2011, Spring 2013

3

4

Education

Professional

Boundaries :: Mexico City Senior Honors Thesis, 2014.

........................................... p.7

LINK David Wayne Hooks Airport

......................................... p.29

Inverted Dichotomies Brooklyn Bridge Park

......................................... p.35

Transitional Landscapes Live Oak Library

......................................... p.43

[GAP] Water Infrastructure, Phnom Penh

......................................... p.51

Sugar Hill House Tanglewood, Houston, Texas

......................................... p.61

Oxford St. House “The Triangle”

......................................... p.65

Taggart St. Townhomes Memorial Park, Houston, Texas

......................................... p.71

Westminster Dr. House Memorial, Houston, Texas

......................................... p.77

5

boundaries : mexico city Daniel Ranostaj Thesis Proposal

6

Boundaries :: Mexico City

Boundaries, formed as a construct of federal mismanagement, cultural identity, and environmental Senior Honors Thesis 2014 challenges, reinforce the instability and uncertainty Mexico City faces, “The history of Mexico City is the story of its seen through the historical layers successive destructions.� of the Aztec settlement, Spanish colonization, and modern day - Ruben Gallo urban city. Tlatelolco, containing the largest urban housing settlement in Mexico City, was designed as one object by all three cultures, partially, but not completely razing traces of the past built form. The partial destruction creates dissonance between the historical layers of the city.

This investigation examines the psychological, physical and historical boundaries of Mexico City to suggest that these interconnected elements do not have to simultaneously compete, further straining relationships of existing boundaries but are able to be used as precedent to dissolve negative boundaries that exist in the between Tlatelolco and its surroundings.

This investigation examines and challenges the psychological, physical and historical idea of the boundary within Tlatelolco by analyzing historical housing typologies in order to challenge the destructive model of development while utilizing cultural and historical determinants in the architecture.

7

8

9

10

2241 catedral cuauhtemoc

subsidence (cm/yr.)

elevation (ft.)

iztapalapa alvaro obregon

benito juarez

water extraction

2228

4 cm/yr

10

1935

1960

2

1985

Urban Edges Object ::City

1910

Mexico City, 1500.

Mexico City, 1524.

Mexico City, 1703.

Mexico City, 1520.

Mexico City, 1628.

Mexico City, 2008.

Water Edges Object :: City

Historical Palimpsest of the 3 Cultures

1891

10 cm/yr

25 cm/yr

2000

The Fragmented Palimpsest. This irregular tabula rasa model in the city’s development is consistent throughout its history, demonstrating that “culture were not a business of accumulation so much as of displacement”. These historical layers, however, are never completely erased, creating an impure slate for the new city layer. This historical inconsistency is seen in the city’s developments, where these layers create boundaries between urban space.

1325

1440

Aztecs claim island on Lake Texcoco

1487

1519

1521

Templo Mayor constructed Montezuma becomes ruler

1522

Cortes conquers Aztecs

Hernan Cortes arrives in Mexico

1629

Mexico City experiences torrential flooding from drained Lake Texcoco

Mexico City rebuilt and named New Spain

Aztec Settlement

~1675

1810

1824

Grand Drainage Canal completed : Lake Texcoco drained Mexican Republic formed

War of Independence with Spain

Templo de Santiago constructed

1900

~1920

1950

1963

Tlatelolco housing project constructed Civil War erupts in Mexico

Spanish Colonization

1968

1985

Tlatelolco Massacre

Mexico City wins bid for 1968 Olympics

Mexico City Earthquake 8.1 Richter scale

20th Century Mexico City

Nonoalco Tlatelolco

Nonoalco Tlatelolco

17th century cathedral

Aztec city-state

Housing Typologies

Aztec city-state

1700, Vecindad, Roma Norte.

1750, Vecindad, Colonia Roma.

1942,Casa Barragan, Tacubaya.

1950, Presidente Juarez Urban Housing, Cuauhtemoc.

1985, Tlaloc, Cuauhtemoc.

11

12

The modernist city. Tlatelolco, containing the largest urban housing settlement in Mexico City, was built through inconsistent planning by incompletely razing traces of the Aztec and Spanish colonization inside the modernist development. These fragmented historical layers are a direct result of the inconsistent tabula rasa model of the city’s destructive and development growth cycle and demonstrate the cultural and historical dissonance that exists between these metaphysical elements of the city’s history.

“was not victory, nor defeat, that was the painful birth of this mestizo town that is today Mexico”

August 13, 1521 :: Defeat of the Aztecs

January 15, 1522 :: Santiago de Tlatelolco

October 2, 1968 :: Tlatelolco Massacre

May 28, 1985 :: Mexico City Earthquake

13

Vecindad housing projects. These structures were result of upper class migration to suburbs in the 1940’s, which led to the creation of multifamily housing inside Mexico City, redeveloped from existing upper class residences. These projects, while following the physical plan of old mansions, are centered around a central patio that acts as the energy core of the residences, where people interact and hold communal activities.

Vecindad :: ~1750

Casa Barragan :: 1942 interior

housing

housing

exterior

patio

public space

public space

recreation

recreation

14

Tlaloc compromises a multi-family housing project adjacent to Tlatelolco in the Cuauhtemoc neighborhood in Mexico City. These apartments are structured around a central courtyard on three sides with parking garage beneath and on the adjacent side of the garden courtyard space. The individual units are organized so that each share a core stair with only one other unit, reinforcing intimacy while private staircases provide access in the two story unit.

Tlaloc :: 1985

unit housing recreation

patio

public space

zahuan

15

Objectified boundaries. These modernist projects, designed around local cultural preferences, are seen in the modus viviendi of Mexican people. With the urbanization of Mexico City in the 1960’s, these spaces were meant to appeal to families moving from the rural areas by responding to their needs of city living. Pani separated interior volumes by providing bedrooms and public living spaces on separate levels, with private interior stairs. The privatized interior patio and zahuan are objectified from past typologies.

Tlatelolco :: 1950 patio

unit

zahuan

16

landscape occupies architecture

housing public space recreation ethnic panel detail

architecture occupies landscape

17

1

2

4

3

18

traces

modernist housing

Tlatelolco, northwest of central Mexico City, compromises the largest and most dense single urban housing project. Developed as a new modernist city by Mario Pani during a time of economic expansion in the 1960s, Tlatelolco was meant to be a city within a city, complete with hospitals, educational facilities, and abundant housing for the growing population.

traces

Aztec ruins

Catholic church

19

20

Indivisible boundaries. Individual layers in the site, such as parking, landscape, park space, and housing structures occupy the space as hyper objects, creating invisible psychological volumes of space inside the modernist development. The project’s site intersects each of the hyper objects seen in Tlatelolco and occupies the landscape in order to realign the historical palimpsest within the site and challenge the psychological boundary of scale of the housing structures.

21

22

Light and Volume as Transition. This project aims combine cultural characteristics from these housing typologies and implement these ideas in order to engage the hyper objects in the site by using light and volume as a transitional element within the architecture of the housing units and surrounding urban space.

Light + Volume :: Transition

garden transition

living

private living

kitchen + bath transition

bedroom 23

el parque

24

el patio

25

26

27

Departures lounge and interior courtyard.

28

David Wayne Hooks Airport Spring, Texas

Link is an investigation into airports relationship to pragmatic conditions in airport safety, function, and how the structure responds to its surrounding environment. In Spring, there is a suburban culture embedded into the area that has caused patches of developments to occur in what is relatively undeveloped wooded areas of land.

This, along with close proximity to a number of residential areas and the future Grand Parkway is a cause for the density of the airport to fit into the current suburban nature of the area. Link is an investigation by using a high volume program to create a low density culture of movement through the space.

29

link the layers

level of development

forest

grasslands

link opposing layers

neighboorhood

site

hooks airport

30

CROSS-SECTION 1/8” -1’0”

31

DEPARTURE

ARRIVAL LOBBY

LOBBY

TICKETING

TICKETING

TICKETING

OPERATIONS

OPERATIONS

OPERATIONS

BAGGAGE HANDLING

BAGGAGE HANDLING

BAGGAGE HANDLING

RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT

RESTAURANT

WAITING AREA

WAITING AREA

WAITING AREA

MECHANICAL

MECHANICAL

MECHANICAL

SECURITY

SECURITY

SECURITY

GATE

GATE

GATE

[

LOBBY

END

START

PROGRAM

[

link

32

BUILDING

CONTEXT

STRUCTURE

STRUCTURE

STRUCTURE

ENCLOSURE

ENCLOSURE

ENCLOSURE

NATURE

NATURE

NATURE

CIRCULATION

CIRCULATION

CIRCULATION

SURROUNDINGS

SURROUNDINGS

SURROUNDINGS

FACADE

FACADE

FACADE

DENSITY

DENSITY

DENSITY

PUBLIC

PUBLIC

PUBLIC

PROGRAM

PROGRAM

PROGRAM

END

START

ISSUES + COMPONENTS

NORTH ELEVATION 1/16” -1’0”

33

34

Brooklyn Bridge Park :: Brooklyn, New York

This investigation analyzes the idea of place in Brooklyn Bridge Park. The current site occupies a void between Manhattan and Brooklyn that is apparent through the views achieved from the site in each direction. This proposal uses placemaking strategies from generative land art, landscape, and architecture to fill the void between the boroughs while providing views to each direction.

The master plan creates pockets of spaces that orient towards either Manhattan or Brooklyn, creating zones that focus attention to each neighborhood. By exploiting the dichotomy of space and utilizing these techniques in the architecture, Manhattan and Brooklyn Heights are always simulataneously visible inside the park.

35

commercial

solar viewports

[

[

park

salt floodscapes

piezo-electric piers

[

generative land art

scene - sensor

link

introvert/extrovert viewports

inefficiency is beautiful

36

dumbo

typological precedents

barry park

brooklyn heights

flow

walkabout

residential

typological tower

promenade at remsen st.

clark st. entrance

south ferry

promenade at orange st.

governors island

brooklyn heights

brooklyn bridge lower manhattan

view / orient rotation

37

commercial

solar viewports

[

[

park

salt floodscapes

typological precedents

38

dumbo

[

brooklyn heights

piezo-electric piers

barry park

residential

vantage points

fl

studio

fl

1 bedroom loft

cross section 1/16” - 1’0”

39

40

41

42

Live Oak Library :: Houston, Texas

Critical Juncture in Transitional Landscapes: Live Oak Library mediates transitional landscapes by reclaiming abandoned silos along Buffalo Bayou and creating a hybrid spaces that acts as a water pump and filtration facility and public library.

By reusing this available land, the project gives back a predominantly neglected community and takes advantage of the future of the Bayou and the partnership with the city for its renovation into an attractive city park space.

43

U.S. 59

-10 .

I.H

navi g

44

gatio n blv

r.

n. y ork

n. liv e oak

st.

on d clint

d.

45

46

Transitional Infrastructure : The water filtration within the pumping station parallels the human experience in the library. This forces the occupant to explore the fold between the city and bayou, the machine and nature.

47

48

49

50

GAP :: Phnom Penh, Cambodia

GAP is an investigation in Phnom Penh that analyzes voids in informal interaction and city infrastructure within Khmer culture. A VLG (very large gap) exists in the identity of public urban spaces in Phnom Penh where social spaces bleed into the streets, mixing public interaction into loosely defined economic zones. The lack of green space and viable infrastructure in the city, deepened by the rapid and spotty unregulated urban development, is creating a disjointed and uneven layering of public interaction, creating unintended gap spaces through the urban areas. This investigation questions and mends the relationship between urban spaces and neglected gaps along the Meanchey Canal, which take advantage of informal density to intermediate flood control and provide public space.

This proposal includes the creation of nodes in neglected urban spaces that begin to create social and economic spaces in the neighborhood context, creating social urban spaces that people flow through. These spaces create small hubs that interact with each other that when linked together that creates viable infrastructure to handle flooding and rain catchment and utilizes pre-existing urban zones for social interaction.

51

unused gap spaces

52

STREET

SHOP

social

SHOP

RESIDENTIAL

[

[

INCONSISTENT CONNECTION

highway 271

INCONSISTENT CONNECTION

NEGLECTED URBAN ZONE

LIMITED INFRASTRUCTURE

[

[

[

[

access

access

[

[ INCONSISTENT CONNECTION

access

RESIDENTIAL

social

INDUSTRY

social

CANAL

social

INDUSTRY

INCONSISTENT CONNECTION

PUBLIC + COMMERCE

URBAN DIAGRAM

NEGLECTED URBAN ZONE

DEVELOPMENT SITES

HIGH TRAFFIC

[

[

[

HIGH TRAFFIC + COMMERCE

INCONSISTENT CONNECTION

ESTABLISH MOVEMENT

BY CREATING NODES

site + filter

[

UTILIZE EXISTING URBAN GAPS CONNECT URBAN ZONES ESTABLISH SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE

mediation

CREATE NEIGHBORHOOD INTERACTION

53

54

Urban Infrastructure Systems : Water infrastruture designate and reinforce the interior spacial volumes while defining the structural systems. Canals that run through the neighborhood act as a flooding prevention system, leading water to the individual nodes, flooding the buildings and the subsequent water filtration instead of the neighborhood.

flooding

catchment through reserviors + gutter canals

filter walls create privacy in program zones

rain

sedimentation/ retention in waffle slabs

operable vertical gardens

55

56

57

marketing visualization for Kipling St. project.

58

Professional Experience

Inter n Architect Allen Bianchi Architects Houston, Texas April 2013 - May 2014

59

schematic renderings for client meeting.

60

Sugar Hill House : Schematic Design + Process Tanglewood, Houston, Texas

courtyard house : The residence, in Houston’s west side, is comprised of a U-shaped plan framed by a separate second floor apartment, to create a centralized pool and outdoor space. the principal and client would work together during the schematic phase by refining hand drawn sketches of plans and elevations.

Schematic renderings were created for client meetings to aid the client’s visualization of space, which detailed the use of material finishes for the walls and flooring.

61

below : schematic sketch of the street facade, along with a section through the main living and public pool spaces. right : the ground floor plan frames the central courtyard and pool.

north elevation

4'-0" SILVER TRAVERTINE STONE CLADDING

33'-6" 22'-117" 8

33'-6"

17'-2"

cross elevation

62

SECTION 1 1/4" - 1'-0"

allen

SILVER TRAVERTINE STONE CLADDING

6'-61" 8

SILVER TRAVERTINE STONE CLADDING

13'-0"

2'-0"

SKYLIGHT

91'-37" 8 9'-23" 8

15'-61 2"

6'-31 2"

21'-23 4"

7'-51 2"

GENERAL 25'-71 4"

6'-0"

1. ALL MATERIA CONTRACT SHAL NOTED.

2. ALL WORK SH DEFECTIVE MAT PERIOD OF ONE SUBSTANTIAL C

24'-0"

8'-87" 8

21'-23 4"

15'-0"

3. THE GENERA RESPONSIBLE FO PROTECTING AL AGAINST DAMAG MISALIGNMENT STANDARDS AN PRACTICE.

13'-0"

4. THE GENERA ALL MECHANICA FOR A COMPLET REQUIRED. ALL NECESSARY, RE CUSTOMARILY I AND EVERY ITEM OUT, SHOWN, O SHALL BE PROVI

23'-55" 8

CARPET

23'-0" CEILING

18'-0"

CARPET

22'-65" 8

13'-8"

TILE SHOWER

CONCRETE

TILE

WOOD 12'-0" CEILING

5. ALL MATERIA SHALL BE INSTA MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATI SERVICE INTEND MATERIALS, EQU PERFORMED BY NEAT, WORKMAN

9' 0.H. DOOR TILE

9' 0.H. DOOR

TILE FUTURE GAS GRILL

GLASS COVERED WALKWAY

6. PRIOR TO TH BUILDER WILL P NOTICE TO INSP COMPLIANCE WI SURVEY REQUIR

10'-15" 8

8'-41 2"

TUB

WOOD DECK SCREEN WALL & GATES

7. THE LOCATIO ITEMS SHOWN O VERIFIED WITH ARCHITECT PRIO INSTALLATION.

8. THE FINAL D ALL FLATWORK VERIFIED WITH CONSTRUCTION

28'-10"

WOOD DECK

9. ALL CONTRA DAILY BASIS, FO OR DISPOSAL TO CONSTRUCTION GENERATED BY

WOOD DECK

15'-101" 8

12'-0" CEILING

10. ALL CONSTR APPLICABLE ENE

80'-5"

TILE

96'-115" 8

11. VERIFY ALL

6'-71 4"

CEILING ABOVE

SCREEN WALL & GATES

WOOD DECK

12. ALL SLEEPIN OPERABLE ESCA MINIMUM CLEAR HEIGHT 24" A.F. 20" MIN. CLEAR FLOOR OPENING OPENING OF 5 S R310.1.3 IRC 20

13. ALL GUARD AND COMPLY W/ NOT ALLOW A 4 GUARDRAILS TO

CEILING ABOVE

12'-21" 2

9'-101" 2

STRUCT. FOR LO CONSTRUCTED W CREATE LADDER

14. SPIRAL STAI SECTION R311.5 7 1/2" MINIMUM NARROWER EDG IDENTICAL.

15. ALL HANDR ABOVE NOSING. BOTTOM RISERS

WALKWAY ABOVE

WALKWAY ABOVE

16. ALL WINDO ANODIZED ALUM LOW E GLASS U WINDOW SCHED CASEMENT WIND TEMP. GLASS AS

12'-0" CEILING

TILE

16'-81" 2

19'-8"

TILE

TILE

TILE

17'-0" CEILING PARTITION SCREEN

17' RAISED CEILING COVE

12'-0"

TILE

LINE OF WINDOW ABOVE

LINE OF OVERHANG ABOVE

6'-51" 2

17'-117" 8

6'-51" 2

8'-0"

6'-51" 2

16'-01" 2

6'-51" 2

9'-81 4"

6'-51" 2

LINE OF OVERHANG ABOVE

84'-0"

ground floor plan

FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/4" - 1'-0"

N

63

marketing rendering for client.

64

Oxford St. : Design through Construction Documents The Heights, Houston, Texas

the triangle house : Comissioned by an artist for his home and studio, the unique lot allows for an irregular plan and elevation along the hike and bike trail in the Houston Heights.

65

below : construction document of cross section. the third floor consisted of the artist’s studio with an open plan and sloped roof.

 

 12'-11" 8

18'-11" 8

2'-113" 8

3'-211" 16

right : construction photograph, December 2013, featured on Swamplot.

  

 

  

2'-0"

 

 

 

10'-11 " 8

5 41'-1 " 8

10'-11 " 8

  

47'-415" 16

2'-0"

 

  

2'-0"

2'-0"

 

3'-0"



  

    



11'-0"

11'-0"

  

 

1'-0"

1'-0"





cross section

WEST

66

67

 6'-211" 16

 

 

 

3'-0"

 

12'-0"

3'-0"



  

11 " 8



47'-415" 16

2'-0"

  

   

 11 " 8

  

713.523.4800 (T)

10'-0"

 

 

2'-0"

 3'-0"





11'-0"

  

EAST ELEVATION

 

7'-811" 16

AIA

allen

east elevation

2111 RICHMOND AVE.



architects

1'-0"

BIANCHI

  

 

1/4"=1'-0"

 

COHEN RESIDENCE 530 OXFORD STREET HOUSTON, TX, 77007

1'-11 9 " 16

   

   

11 " 8

12'-0"

  

10'-0"

47'-415" 16

2'-0"

  

  





11 " 8



2'-0"

  

  



11'-0"

  



06.27.2013

FOR REVIE

07.29.2013

FOR REVIE

08.05.2013

FOR REVIE

1'-0"

08.13.2013 ISSUED FOR P



south elevation

08.30.2013

REVISION

09.10.2013

REVISION

DRAWN BY:

D.RANOS J.JAWDA R.VO

PROJECT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

EXTERIOR ELEVATIO

68

SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4"=1'-0"

SHEET NO.

A3.2

   11'-11 4"

3" 54 '-

13

℄ 

℄

1" 92 '-

12

  

3'-7 9 " 16



3'-413" 16



℄ 

 



5'-1013" 16

3" 54

'-

69

41'-37 " 8

1" -7 2

7'





℄



"

-1

7'

  



 

℄ 

  

 

℄  





 

  

6"

PROP. LINE



5'-93 4"

2'-81 4"

℄

13'-913" 16

℄

5'-8 3 " 16

2'-11"

5'-515" 16

℄



   

3'-0"

8'-6" 2'-6"



PROP. LINE

 

" 13 7 16

   

" 15 6 -5 1

6'-0"

 7'

   

9 " 6 -7 1

2'

5'-7"

     

1" -7 4

1T @ 12" 2R @ 6"

 

9'

 4'-21" 2

  







℄

℄

3'-0"

7'-5" 2'-41 2"

    

1" -1 2

1'-11"





8'

  









℄ 1'-9"

4'-7"



5'-0 5 " 16

 



48'-5 1 " 16

ground floor plan

69

marketing rendering for magazine publication.

70

Taggart St. : Construction Documents Memorial Park, Houston, Texas

71

EPB EM

allen

architects

BIANCHI

SD

WP

FP

GFCI WP GFCI

J.BOX

WP GFCI

6505 TAGGART AVE UNIT A AND B

WP

3

GFCI

GFCI TV

GFCI

GFCI

SD

J.BOX

FL WP FL

3 GFCI

GFCI

WP FL TV

FL

FL

GFCI

WP GFCI

FL

SD

FL

3

GFCI

J.BOX WP GFCI

GFCI

GFCI

GFCI

GFCI

FL CO

TV

WP GFCI WP

WP GFCI

GFCI

BREAKER BOX

WP GFCI

POWER POLE

WP GFCI

02.27.13 FOR REVIEW

03.27.13 FOR REVIEW

EM WP GFCI

WP GFCI

EM

BREAKER BOX

WP GFCI

04.05.13 FOR REVIEW

05.02.13 FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR B 07.02.13 PERMIT POWER POLE

DRAWN BY: J JAWDAT D RANOSTA PROJECT NO:

first floor electrical plan

SHEET TITLE: FIRST FLOOR ELECT

ELECTRICAL PLAN- FIRST FLOOR 1/4"=1'-0"

72

N

SHEET NO.

allen

architects

BIANCHI

6505 TAGGART AVE UNIT A AND B

02.27.13 FOR REVIE

03.27.13 FOR REVIE

04.05.13 FOR REVIE

05.02.13 FOR REVIE ISSUED FOR 07.02.13 PERMIT

!

window schedule

DRAWN BY: J JAWDA D RANOS

ALL WINDOWS NEED TO BE FIELD MEASURED BEFORE FABRICATION

PROJECT NO:

SHEET TITLE: WINDOW/DOOR UNIT SHEET NO.

WINDOW SCHEDULE 1/4"=1'-0"

73

allen

architects

BIANCHI 6505 TAGGART AVE

02.27.13 FOR REV

03.27.13 FOR REV

04.05.13 FOR REV

05.02.13 FOR REV ISSUED FO 07.02.13 PERMIT

DRAWN BY: J JAWD D RANO PROJECT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

INTERIOR E SHEET NO.

INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 3/8"=1'-0"

interior elevations

74

allen

BIANCHI

02.27.13 FOR

03.27.13 FOR

04.05.13 FOR

05.02.13 FOR ISSUE 07.02.13 PER

DRAWN BY: JJ D

PROJECT NO

SHEET TITLE

cross section

SHEET NO.

BUILDING SECTION 1 1/4"=1'-0"

75

exterior rendering of the backyard and patio.

76

Westminster Drive : Schematic + Design Development Houston, Texas

77

below : the site plan displays the home’s orientation to the natural ravine and bayou, along the rear of the lot.

At the client’s request, the main challenge was to utilize the existing foundation to minimize any effects to the natural environment.

 





right : the ground floor plan and rendering display the south elevation, that opens up to the sloping landscape.



   



 

    











































site plan

78

   



 



 





 













 





  









    









 

 









  











 





 

 











 







 











 

 





 































 















 

 

  





 





 





 



 

 

  



 

 









 

 





 







  













  

 

 

 

 



 





 





ground floor plan





FIRST FLOOR PLAN

N





1/4"=1'-0"









  









  







 

 











  





 









WINE CELLAR PLAN 1/4"=1'-0"

N

PAVILION PLAN

N

1/4"=1'-0"

79

DANIEL RANOSTAJ p. 713. 834. 2716 e. d.ranostaj@gmail.com

80