A302a_Fall 2011 Portfolio

A302a STUDIO PORTFOLIO FALL 2011

DANIEL NGUYEN | FALLETTA STUDIO

P01

P02

P03

P04

PROJECT 1 UNIT DESIGN The design of housing can be understood as an exercise in physical, environmental and social managment. Housing must be scaled to the size and proportion of the human body and designed to support basic human activities such as sleeping, eating with friends, and storing our most important posessions. Housing must mitigate our natural environment, making it as comfortable to live in coastal Japan as it is in west Texas. And housing is the setting for many of our most important social relationships which, as any teenager knows, can have important spatial imperatives. Housing, in short, creates the background for much our lives and consequently, its design can facilitate, support and even confound the way those lives are lived.

PROJECT OBJECTIVES A) To develop a dwelling space with an articulate wrapper responsive to the needs of three roommates in close proximity in various climactic environments.

B) To understand how issues of sustainability and passive systems affect living environments. > To understand the human body and its various dimensional

PROJECT 1 MIXED USERS Users consisted of a retired grandmother, a single father, and a child

SITE: Texas Plains

WINTER AVERAGES Low: 32 | High: 55 SUMMER AVERAGES Low: 61 | High: 95 DANGERS Thunderstorms Drought Tornadoes Wind Speed Sand Storms Hail ANNUAL RAIN/YR 16-32” / year WETTEST MONTHS May + April PREVAILING WINDS Southwest Winds (40mph)

The first step in the process was to develop a handful of study models that would operate to defend the occupants from either disadvantages of the site’s climate or how to benefit from the site’s terrain.

They ranged from massing models to conceptual models that were more focused on providing strategies or techniques. For instance, one would focus on how to collect local rainwater or act to block sunlight or wind.

B 4

A

B A

4

3

3

2

2

1 1

Reference

Sections 1/2" = 1'

Sectional Plans 1/8" = 1'

Initially, the design was focused around a ramp that would wrap around the central core and all activity would be harvested from that internal core.

N

W

N

S

SUMMER

W

S

WINTER

Roof adapts to climate according to season, temperature and weather conditions. For instance, in freezing temperatures during the Winter, rain and particles of hail can be collected in the large roof device, filtered through a basin, and be used to cool the house through mist during hot summers. During the summer, the roof can be extended out to provide larger shading for the glass facade.

B

SITE

SITE

A

A

TIGHT KNIT FAMILY TIGHT KNIT FAMILY Daniel Nguyen | Liz Falletta Daniel Nguyen | Liz Falletta A

A

RETIRED GRANDMOTHER

RETIRED GRANDMOTHER

B

SINGLE WORK AT HOME FATHER

B

SINGLE WORK AT HOME FATHER

C

INFANT SON

C

INFANT SON

B

WEST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION

Single Working Father Single Working Father Private/Public Retired Bathroom Private/Public GrandmotherBathroom Retired Grandmother Proposed Envelope Proposed Envelope Space Limitations Infant Space Limitations Infant Kitchen / Dining Room / Living Room Kitchen / Communal Dining Room / Living Room / Public

&

Can be used for misting air during hot temperatures in summer, captured water can be reused for housings purposes Can be used for misting air during hot temperatures in summer, captured water can be reused for housings purposes

&

Communal / Public

The people in this living space are an infant boy, who is the son of the work at home single father and in time the father will be responsible for taking care of his mother as well. After having a divorce, the father decided to move into something The people in thissmaller living space are cheaper an infantwhere boy, who is the equally son of the single and father and in time the father will that was he could takework careatofhome his mother child. be responsible for taking care of his mother as well. After having a divorce, the father decided to move into something smaller that was cheaper where he could equally take care of his mother and child.

In order to address the needs of this family, it seemed necessary to have the father and grandmother near the infant at all times, allocating the second floor for bathroom, resting and a relaxation space while downstairs would provide a suitable In order to address the needs of family,larger it seemed necessary have and grandmother near the infantaatbitallolder. environment forthis a slightly group of peopletoand an the areafather for the child to play in when he grew times, allocating the second floor for bathroom, resting and a relaxation space while downstairs would provide a suitable environment for a slightly larger group of people and an area for the child to play in when he grew a bit older.

PROCESS PROCESSFOR PROGRAMMATIC LAYOUT FOR PROGRAMMATIC LAYOUT

Summer Winter Summer, and expose the facade more in Winter SummerAllows for less heat to penetrate the glass windows in Winter Allows for less heat to penetrate the glass windows in Summer, and expose the facade more in Winter

SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES

A

B

A

B

SECTIONS

Resting Space

B

ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVITIES

Bathing / Working Space Living Space Kitchen / Dining *Exterior skin/shell is removed

FLOOR PLANS

A

P01

P02

P03

P04

PROJECT 2 PRECEDENT ANALYSIS This second studio problem is two-pronged: Conduct a precedent analysis on an assigned housing projectin pairs.

Each pair are asked to research, analyze and present a housing precedent projet. A total of six precedent projects are studied and documented in each studio.

PROJECT 2 PRECEDENT ANALYSIS Our group was assigned Charles Correa’s tube housing prototype, a concept that provided dwellings for low income families and a precedent at its time that would be implemented in his future architectural work.

CT Charles Correa N Ahmedabad, India Hot and Arid ARCHITECT Charles Correa ARCHITECT Charles Correa OF UNITS 1 LOCATION Ahmedabad, India Correa India Ahmedabad, ES OF AGGREGATION Expanded horizantally / Aggregated to create communities CLIMATEARCHITECT HotLOCATION and AridCharles India COMPLETION (PROTOTYPE) 1960 NUMBERLOCATION OF CLIMATE UNITSAhmedabad, 1 Hot and Arid CLIMATE Hot and NUMBER OF Arid UNITS Expanded 1 UNIT SIZE 12’ x 60’ PRINCIPLES OF AGGREGATION horizantally / Aggregated to create communities NUMBER OF UNITS 1 PRINCIPLES OF AGGREGATION E Single Family Row-Housing YEAR OF COMPLETION (PROTOTYPE) 1960 Expanded horizantally / Aggregated to create communities OF Expanded horizantally / Aggregated to create communities YEAR COMPLETION (PROTOTYPE) 1960 # OF UNITS / ACRE) INDETERMINATE TYPICALPRINCIPLES UNIT SIZEOF 12’ x AGGREGATION 60’ YEAR OF Family COMPLETION 1960 TYPICAL UNIT SIZE(PROTOTYPE) 12’ x 60’ OF PARKING STALLS INDETERMINATE UNIT TYPE Single Row-Housing TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 12’ x 60’ UNIT TYPE Single INDETERMINATE Family Row-Housing DENSITY (# OF UNITS / ACRE) Roof Plan TYPE Single Family Row-Housing (# OF UNITS / ACRE) INDETERMINATE NUMBERUNIT OF DENSITY PARKING STALLS INDETERMINATE DENSITY (# OFOF UNITS / ACRE) INDETERMINATE ng was a first prize winner in an All-Indian competition in 1960 for low-cost housing. Although specified to design for NUMBER PARKING STALLS INDETERMINATE ents, Correa designed the prototype to provide row-housing, which proved to have larger living space per family within NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS INDETERMINATE

Roof Plan

et.

The Tube Housing was a first prize winner in an All-Indian competition in 1960 for low-cost housing. Although specified to design for walk-up apartments,The Correa prototype to provide which proved toinhave living space per family within Tubedesigned Housingthe was a first prize winnerrow-housing, in an All-Indian competition 1960larger for low-cost housing.

Although specified to design for a low-cost budget. walk-up apartments, Correa prototype competition to provide row-housing, which proved to have largerspecified living space per family The Tube Housing was a first prize designed winner in the an All-Indian in 1960 for low-cost housing.

Although to design for within low-cost budget. e ground levels, it allows for multi-use of spaces. In such case, doors are not used to designate different spaces, but aapartments, walk-up Correa designed the prototype to provide row-housing, which proved to have larger living space per family within The openings set up convection currents of natural ventilation throughout the open space. ng heights of space. a low-cost budget.

The openings set up convection currents of natural ventilation throughout the open space.

Unit Aggregation Byover offsetting the ground levels, it allows for multi-use In such case, doors are used to designate different spaces, but ded by the pergola-grid (a garden feature that creates a shaded walkway, passageway, sitting area) the internal The openings set up convection currents of of spaces. natural ventilation throughout thenot open space. rather varying heights of space.

By offsetting the ground levels, it allows for multi-use of spaces. In such case, doors are not used to designate different spaces, but ensures that the patio is not seal off in the vertical plane alongside of the kitchen and mezzanine but by athe horizontal ratherthe the ground varyinglevels, heightsit of space. eates a single roof that covers not only the main part of the building and the bathroom, but also the indoor courtyard.

By offsetting allows for multi-use of spaces. In such case, doors are not used to designate different spaces, but B Security is provided by the pergola-grid (a garden feature that creates a shaded walkway, passageway, sitting area) over the internal rather the varying heights of space.

Ahmedabad, India courtyard. This ensures that is the patio is by notthe seal off in the vertical plane alongside of the kitchen and mezzanine but by a horizontal Security provided pergola-grid (a garden feature that creates a shaded walkway, passageway, sitting area) over the internal e mezzanine is shaped in a form of an otla (a raised platform).

Ahmedabad, India porgola. ThisSecurity creates a provided single roof notthe only the part of the building the bathroom, but also the indoor courtyard. courtyard.

This ensures that patio ismain notfeature seal offthat in the vertical plane alongside of the kitchen and mezzanine a horizontal is bythat the covers pergola-grid (a garden creates aand shaded walkway, passageway, sitting area) over but the by internal Ahmedabad, India porgola.

This creates a single that covers the main ofAthe building and theand bathroom, but but alsoby thea indoor courtyard. courtyard.

This ensures that the patioroof is not seal off innot theonly vertical planepart alongside of the kitchen mezzanine horizontal The profile ofporgola. the mezzanine is shaped in aroof formthat of an otla (a platform).

This creates a single covers notraised only the main part of the building and the bathroom, but also the indoor courtyard.

Ahmedabad, India The profile of the mezzanine is shaped in a form of an otla (a raised platform).

Floor Plan Ahmedabad, IndiaThe profile of the mezzanine is shaped in a form of an otla (a raised platform).

et up convection currents of natural ventilation throughout the open space.

Ahmedabad, India

Roof Plan Roof Plan

Dayligh

B B A A

A

Floor Plan

B

Floor Plan Floor Plan

Landscape & Open Space Hardscape v. Softscape Open Softscape | Enclosed Hardscape

Front Elevation

Section A

Section B

Side Elevation

Side Elevation Side Elevation

Front Elevation

Front Elevation Front Elevation

Section A

Section A Section A

Section B

Unit Circulation

Courtyard / Patio

Living Room / Sleeping Quarters

ective of Tube Housing Prototype Perspective of Tube Housing Prototype Perspective of Tube Housing Prototype

Living Room Perspective from Mezzanine Hallway to Courtyard / Patio Hallway to Courtyard / Patio Hallway to Courtyard / Patio

Concept of Aggregated Model

Ventilation (Wind)

Living Room / Sleeping Quarters Living Room Perspective from Mezzanine Concept of Aggregated Model Living Room / Sleeping Quarters Living Room Perspective from Mezzanine Concept of Aggregated Model Living Room / Sleeping Quarters Living Room Perspective from Mezzanine Concept of Aggregated Model

Section B Section B Overlapping Program

Public | Private

Daylighting

egation Daylighting

Day

e & Open Space e v. Softscape

Day

nclosed Hardscape

LANDSCAPE + OPEN SPACE Night Night

on (Wind)

Building Massing

Overlapping Program

ulation

Building Massing

Overlapping Program

UNIT CIRCULATION

OVERLAPPING PROGRAM BUILDING MASSING

"Ahmedabad, India Map." Bing, n.d. Web. 16 Sept. 2011. <http://www.bing.com/local/GetMap.ashx?ppl=34,,23.0279922538107,72.5941238032841&b=h,mkt.en-

us,stl.h&rf=o&rp=n&z=13&c=23.027521,72.594295&w=660&h=602>.

"Ahmedabad, India Map." Bing, n.d. Web. 16 Sept. 2011. <http://www.bing.com/local/GetMap.ashx?ppl=34,,23.0279922538107,72.5941238032841&b=h,mkt.en"Charles Correa." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, us,stl.h&rf=o&rp=n&z=13&c=23.027521,72.594295&w=660&h=602>.

2011. Web. 16 Sep. 2011. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/138593/Charles-Correa>.

"Charles Correa." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, Featured Architect: Charles Correa. Living Steel, 2010. Web. 16 Sept. 2011.

2011. Web. 16 Sep. 2011. <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/138593/Charles-Correa>. <http://www.livingsteel.org/featured-architect-charles-correa>.

Featured Architect: Charles Correa. Living Steel, 2010. Web. 16 Sept. 2011.

Khan, Hassan-Udan. Charles Correa: Architect in India. N.p.: Butterworth Architecture, 1984. 32-42. <http://www.livingsteel.org/featured-architect-charles-correa>.

Web. 16 Sept. 2011. <http://www.scribd.com/doc/48232937/Charles-Correa-Architect-in-India>.

Khan, Hassan-Udan. Charles Correa: Architect in India. N.p.: Butterworth Architecture, 1984. 32-42.

Web. 16 Sept. 2011. <http://www.scribd.com/doc/48232937/Charles-Correa-Architect-in-India>.

Khan, Hasan-Uddin. Charles Correa: Architect in India. N.p.: n.p., 1987. Print.

Public | Private

Khan, Hasan-Uddin. Charles Correa: Architect in India. N.p.: n.p., 1987. Print.

Frampton, Kenneth. Charles Correa. N.p.: Thomas & Hudson, 1996. Print.

Bibliography

Public | Private

VENTILATION (WIND)

Bibliography

Frampton, Kenneth. Charles Correa. N.p.: Thomas & Hudson, 1996. Print.

PUBLIC / PRIVATE

P01

P02

P03

P04

PROJECT 3 LOW RISE DEVELOPMENT This project introduces the design of housing in a high-density, low-rise setting. Assigned with a typically-sized South Pasadena lot (approximately 50’ x 100’), then design four sustainable dwelling units that formulate and present a “user group profile” to specify for whom the development is targeted with respect to age range, family status, group size and composition, and special characteristics such as shared professional interests.

From the user group profile, students are asked to proivde a detailed program of dwelling unit types, sizes, and characteristics.

SITE # 6

SITE: South Pasadena - Adjacent to the intersection of Meridian & Magnolia -There are 13 sites total, each student was given 1 site from the highlighted area

Several study models were developed for the site to sieve through several ideas at a rapid pace and narrow down to a single logic that would benefit the user group and adapt best to site conditions.

B

C

B

C

A

Conceptual study models were further developed in order to gather issues from the site and how they could be addressed through form and space. These served primarily as massing models and by inverting the initial model, it allowed us to achieve an understanding of voids, orientation as well as hierarchy through emphasis in massing. I found interest in having one monilithic mass with units carved out to provide a public pathway directly through the site.

A

SITE 6 LOW RISE DEVELOPMENT IN PASADENA

MASSING

DIAGRAMMATICAL EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC 1/8” = 1’0 PERFORATED ROOF SECOND FLOOR CIRCULATION TO SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR FIRST FLOOR GROUND ENCLOSURE

IDEAL USER GROUP College students APPROACH Initially, the goal was to provide housing for college students in the area and provide a common walkable path that allow public traffic to get through the narrow site from either end. The size and scale of the units would define this path and provide a narrative for the project.

UNIT PLAN(S) / DISSECTION 1/8” = 1’0

SHOWER

UNIT DESIGN BATHROOM

LIVING ROOM

DESK / DRESSER

KITCHEN

BED

UNIT FLOOR ENCLOSURE

EAST ELEVATION Scale: 1/8” =1’0

SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/8” =1’0

RENDERING Scale: N/A

1 UNIT FOR ALL | SITE 6 Daniel Nguyen | Liz Falletta

Magnolia Street

CORRUGATED METAL ROOF CORREGATED METAL ROOF

2

7

A

B

WOOD CONSTRUCTION

WOODEN CONSTRUCTION / FACADE

A

A

8

1

AXON Scale: 1/16” =1’0 B

Meridian Avenue FLOOR PLANS Scale: 1/4” =1’0 SITE PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

DIAGRAMS Scale: N/A

SECTION A Scale: 1/4” =1’0

5

N

GREEN DRIVEWAY GREEN DRIVEWAY

SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/8” =1’0

2

1

FLOOR PLANS Scale: 1/4” =1’0

SECTION A Scale: 1/4” =1’0

EAST ELEVATION Scale: 1/8” =1’0

RENDERING Scale: N/A

SOUTH PASADENA ROW HOUSING Daniel Nguyen | Liz Falletta

Exposing the four units to natural light to characterize and diversify typical row housing units through light wells, skylights and punctures through the facade made it possible to manipulate the units. By directing light into specifc programmatic spaces, spaces would ultimately be defined by the quality of natural light penetrating the facade. Utilization of materials like wood and corrugated metal roofing to improve the overall sustainability of the project.

Building orientation to site blocks direct sunlight penetration, yet allows light to come in through the north side. Similar units not only allow the users inhabiting the spaces to all receive equal quality of livng space, but it additionally makes the fabrication process simpler and more efficient.

USER GROUPS

PROJECT DATA

DIAGRAMMING SPACE

COUPLES

Unit Types: 2 Number of Units: 4 Units Aggregated Horizontally

2 Bedroom Units Allow:

Alley

Meridian Ave.

Meridian Ave. OPEN SPACE STRATEGY

Alley

Private Open Space: 151.5563 square ft Common Open Space: 837.7863 square ft Overall Unit Size: 5398.2293 square ft

DAYLIGHTING

SINGLES

SHARED GREEN SPACE

Private Open Space

Green Space

Public Open Space

UP

UP

B BUILT VS. NATURAL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Scale: 1/32” = 1’0”

Built

Lanscape

ACCESS

Alley Alley

UP

UP

Meridian Ave.

A

Meridian Ave.

A

Alley Alley

B

SOUTH ELEVATION Scale: 1/8” =1’0

EAST ELEVATION Scale: 1/8” =1’0

CORREGATED METAL ROOF

SECOND FLOOR Scale: 1/8” =1’0

WOODEN CONSTRUCTION / FACADE

GREEN DRIVEWAY

UP

SECOND FLOOR Scale: 1/8” =1’0

UP

UP

UP

AXONOMETRIC Scale: 1/16” =1’0

SECOND FLOOR Scale: 1/8” =1’0

SECTION A Scale: 1/4” =1’0

SECTION B Scale: 1/4” =1’0

RENDERING Scale: N/A

P01

P02

P03

P04

PROJECT 4 MEDIUM RISE DEVELOPMENT In this final studio project, students develop an urban housing scheme that explores the potential for site, typology, historic precedent, nature, organizational ideas, ordering principles, circulation, material studies, event structures, and systems integration to inspire fresh combinations and well-reasoned frameworks for the design of domestic space.

PROJECT OBJECTIVES A) To develop a thoughtful housing type responsive to local lifestyles and concerns unique to the greater metropolitan Los Angeles area.

B) To identify active and effective dwelling spaces that emphasize the influence of human scale, compositional coherence and contextual compatibility.

C) To illustrate that medium-density housing units can be tied to urban issues derived from site contours, neighborhood amenities, building orientation, prevailing patterns of movement, and a desire for natural light, ventilation and physical access.

D) To employ design strategies that enhance or articulate clear and distinct relationships between interior and exterior space.

E) To explore imaginative uses for available materials and thoughtful means for the application of structural systems.

F) To account for the impact of environmental factors, the consumption of energy and the role of technology in the field of housing. > To establish that special issues linked to the disabled community might introduce design opportunities and suggest solutions that will stimulate rather than impede the formation of creative accessible environments.

SITE: La Cienega + Jefferson Blvd.

-There were 3 sites: Little Tokyo, Silverlake, and La Cienega/Jefferson, all of which were located near an MTA station.

Several study models were developed; however, these are a few that contributed the most to the final design. They were key pieces in the development of the project and provided methodologies for housing.

INITIAL UNIT MODEL

LA CIENEGA BOUL EVARD

UPPER FLOOR PLANS

FIRST FLOOR PLANS

CONTEXTUAL GROUND FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

UNIT TYPES SECOND FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

EVARD LA CIENEGA BOUL

CONTEXTUAL GROUND CONTEXTUAL FLOORGROUND PLAN FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

LA CIENEGA BOUL

EVARD

SECTION A Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

UNITS A/B Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

SECTION B Scale: 1/16” = 1’0” SECOND FLOORSECOND PLAN FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

LA CIENEGA BOULE VARD

SECTION A SECTION A Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

After several concept models were produced, the design process led to early plans. Unit types and basic floor plans and parking plans were introduced in order to attempt to tackle programmatic problems and it became quite taxing to deal with building codes and restrictions.

SECTION B SECTION B Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

UNITS A/B UNITS A/B Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

REVISED PARKING PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

PARKING PLAN

LA CIENEGA LEV BOULARD EVARD

LA CIENEGA BOUL

EVARD PARKING PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

LA CIENEGA BOU

CONTEXTUAL CONTEXTUAL GROUND GROUND FLOOR FLOOR PLANPLAN Scale:Scale: 1/16” 1/16” = 1’0”= 1’0”

Development of the units is key in providing adaquete living spaces for the ideal user group of graduate students and students getting out of college and shifting into the workforce. It is important to not only provide individualized units, but also have shared communal spaces that not only the public could access but the inhabitants of the apartment as well. The first floor is dedicated to commercial with retail spaces and a dog park that would allow apartment owners to walk their pets as well as pet owners in the community.

SITE PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN Scale: 1/16” = 1’0” Scale:Scale: 1/16” 1/16” = 1’0”= 1’0”

A

SECTION A SECTION A Scale:Scale: 1/8” =1/8” 1’0”= 1’0”

SECTION B Scale: 1/8” = 1’0”

UNIT PLANS A/B Scale: 1/4” = 1’0”

B

LA CIENEGA BOU

LEVARD

space.

PARKING PLAN PARKING PLAN / UNDERGROUND Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

UP

UP

UP

UP

UP

FIRST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR LEVEL PLAN / CONTEXT Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

LA CIENEGA BOU

LEVARD

DN

UP

UP

AVERAGE FLOOR PLAN / THIRD FLOOR Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

SECOND + THIRD FLOOR PLAN

LA CIENEGA BOU LEVARD

GROUND FLOOR LEVEL PLAN / CONTEXT Scale: 1/16” = 1’0”

STRUCTURAL COLUMNS UNIT TYPE A UNIT TYPE B UNIT TYPE C ELEVATOR // FIRE STAIR

Once I had generated the overall form of the project, I began to modify unit placement. By pushing and pulling units, I was able to shed natural light into some spaces while providing shade in others, and the floorplans produced a porous quality, but lacked a consistency. Feedback from critics more or less stated that it was important to look back at my initial study models because the project had become to conservative, and although everything worked and functioned according to code, it would not be a desirable place to live due to its lack of authenticity.

A04 - MIDRISE HOUSING / JUXTAPOSING VOLUMES / DANIEL NGUYEN / FALLETTA STUDIO

US Co pro

Site Plan

Following review, Scale: 1/16" =mid 1'0" MODIFIED SITE PLANit became essential to folRevised low my initial study model more closely. During the development process I became overwhelmed

BIG De ge It b lac aim allo pu gre ity. int pro pro rem ge sp

QU

UN Ty Siz 72 Sp 15 Ou 13

CO

provide housing for the desired us project would provide a hub for remove themselves from the hustle geles and instead assemble in this space.

Site Plan Scale: 1/16" = 1'0"

QUALITATIVE DETAILS

UNITS / SPACE Types 1 Size 727.6 square ft.

Space / Bedroom 155.6 square ft Outdoor Private Open Space 137.6 square ft.

COMMON SHARED SPACE 33,887.5 square ft.

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE SPACE 35,284 square ft. (Ground Floor) PARKING 54 Parking Spaces 6 Handicap Parking Spaces

4th Floor Scale: 1/16" = 1'0"

QUANTITATIVE DETAILS

4TH FLOOR PLAN

4th Floor Scale: 1/16" = 1'0"

QUANTITATIVE DETAILS

29’7

2nd + 3rd Floor Scale: 1/16" = 1'0"

2ND / 3RD FLOOR PLAN

Unit Plan Scale: 1/4” = 1’0”

Perspective from Green Roof Scale: N/A

1ST FLOOR PLAN 1st Floor Scale: 1/16" = 1'0"

Perspective from La Cienega Scale: N/A

31’7

29’7

UNIT PLAN

Unit Plan Scale: 1/4” = 1’0”

QUALITATIVE DETAILS USER GROUP College graduate students / Students transitioning into professional work force BIG IDEA(S) Develop a space that will not only accommodate the suggested user group, but the larger surrounding community. It became apparent after the site visit that the territory lacked a sense of place; it was not welcoming. The project aims to provide a gathering space at the base of the site, allowing members of the community to aggregate in the public park and and provide a limited retail adjacent to the green space that would host space for commercial activity. The exposed public green space would invite public into the open space below while the upper floors would provide housing for the desired user group. Ideally, the project would provide a hub for metro train goers to remove themselves from the hustle and bustle of Los Angeles and instead assemble in this enclosed, intimate space designed to promote social activity.

QUANTITATIVE DETAILS BACKGROUND Dimensions 176’ 227/32” x 267’ 361/64” Square Footage 46,067 SF QUANTITATIVE DETAILS COMMON SHARED SPACE BACKGROUND 33,887.5 square ft.

Dimensions 176' 227/32" x 267' 361/64" Square Footage 46,067 SF PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE SPACE COMMON SHARED SPACE 35,284 square ft. (Ground Floor) 33,887.5 square ft.

PARKING PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE SPACE 51 Parking Spaces 35,284 square ft. (Ground Floor) 5 Handicap Parking Spaces PARKING UNITS 51 Parking Spaces 5 Handicap Parking Spaces Type(s): 1 # of Units 53 UNITS Type(s): 1 TOTAL # of Units 53 907.2859 square ft.

SQUARE FOOTAGE / BEDROOM TOTAL 907.2859 square ft.

185.5550 square ft.

SQUARE FOOTAGE / BEDROOM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 185.5550 square ft.

173.7019 square ft PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 173.7019 square ft

FINALIZED PLANS DETAILS

32’8

30’8 UNIT PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"

FINALIZED PLANS SITE PLAN A04 / MIDRISE HOUSING / JUXTAPOSED HOUSING / DANIEL NGUYEN / FALLETTA STUDIO QUALITATIVE DETAILS USER GROUP

College graduate students / Students transitioning into pr

BIG IDEA(S)

Develop a space that will not only accommodate the sugg nity. It became apparent after the site visit that the territor project aims to provide a gathering space at the base of t gate in the public park and and provide a limited retail a commercial activity. The exposed public green space wou upper floors would provide housing for the desired user metro train goers to remove themselves from the hustle and closed, intimate space designed to promote social activity

QUANTITATIVE DETAILS BACKGROUND

Dimensions 176' 227/32" x 267' 361/64" Square Footage 46,067 SF

COMMON SHARED SPACE 33,887.5 square ft.

SITE PLAN / ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = 1'0"

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE SPACE 35,284 square ft. (Ground Floor)

PARKING

51 Parking Spaces 5 Handicap Parking Spaces

UNITS

Type(s): 1 # of Units 43

TOTAL

907.2859 square ft.

SQUARE FOOTAGE / BEDROOM 185.5550 square ft.

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 173.7019 square ft

UNIT SCALE

metro train goers to remove themselves from the hustle and bustle of Los Angeles and instea closed, intimate space designed to promote social activity.

QUANTITATIVE DETAILS BACKGROUND

FINALIZED PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN

Dimensions 176' 227/32" x 267' 361/64" Square Footage 46,067 SF

COMMON SHARED SPACE 33,887.5 square ft.

SITE PLAN / ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = 1'0"

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE SPACE 35,284 square ft. (Ground Floor)

PARKING

51 Parking Spaces 5 Handicap Parking Spaces

UNITS

Type(s): 1 # of Units 43

TOTAL

907.2859 square ft.

30’8

SQUARE FOOTAGE / BEDROOM 185.5550 square ft.

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 173.7019 square ft

FOURTH FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

UNIT PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'0"

185.5550 square ft.

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 173.7019 square ft

FINALIZED PLANS SECOND + THIRD FLOOR PLAN

FOURTH FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

GREEN ROOF GARDEN @ 3PM SCALE: N/A

SECOND + THIRD FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

UNIT SCALE

GREEN ROOF GARDEN @ 3PM SCALE: N/A

FINALIZED PLANS FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND + THIRD FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

1ST FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

UNDERGROUND PARKING SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

FINALIZED PLANS SOUTH ELEVATION

1ST FLOOR SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

UNDERGROUND PARKING SCALE: 1/16" = 1'0"

SOUTH ELEV SCALE: 1/8"

SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'0"

WEST ELEVAT SCALE: 1/8" =

VATION = 1'0"

TION = 1'0"

FINALIZED PLANS WEST ELEVATION

FINALIZED PLANS SECTION

WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'0"

SECTION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'0"

PERSPECTIVE FROM ROOF GARDEN

FINAL UNIT MODEL