March 3, 2016

Founded 1876 daily since 1892 online since 1998

Thursday march 3, 2016 vol. cxl no. 25

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } BEYOND THE BUBBLE

George, POCC testify on free speech News editor

Princeton Open Campus Coalition co-founder Joshua Zuckerman ’16 and McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence Robert George testified at a House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee hearing on Wednesday.

The hearing centered on whether tax-exempt colleges and universities are using the tax code to avoid upholding their commitment to create an open marketplace of ideas on campuses.

According to the committee website, the hearing was announced by Oversight Subcommittee Chair Peter Roskam (R-IL), following an incident at Georgetown University Law Center when a student was barred from distributing campaign material for a presidential candidate.

In his testimony, Zuckerman said that his coalition believes that the protection of free speech is vital to the flourishing of the

university.

Zuckerman noted the BJL sitins last November when protesters called for increased faculty cultural competency training, affinity housing for students interested in black culture and mandatory courses that present the ‘struggles of minorities.’

He noted that his coalition opposes these demands due to their destructive effects on the free flow of speech and thought.

These demands, if accepted, may lead to University sanctioned orthodoxies, he said, and those who defy them will be labeled as racists and slandered publicly.

Zuckerman also noted that many POCC members, since formally opposing these demands, have been subjected to ad hominem attacks. For instance, a black student and co-founder of the coalition, after expressing dissenting opinions in a Facebook post that the demand for affinity housing creates selfsegregation, was labeled as a See HEARING page 2

LECTURE

BEYOND THE BUBBLE

Lowery, Knowles talk hierarchy of privilege

By William Liu contributor

When addressing social inequality, it is in the interest of people on the bottom to destabilize and those at the top to stabilize the system, Brian Lowery, the Walter Kenneth Kilpatrick Professor of Organizational Behavior at Stanford University, said.

Lowery initiated the discussion with a focused analysis of the concept of hierarchy in modern society, particularly as it relates to racial issues and the concept of white privilege.

According to Lowery, problems commonly addressed in psychology involve the existence of established hierarchies and why individuals at the bottom keep the status quo, rather than rise up against the establishment.

Most psychological studies, however, focus on the costs to

COURTESY OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS

Zuckerman ‘16 and professor Robert George testified before the Ways and Means Oversight subcommittee.

the people at the bottom tiers of society, instead of addressing the downward pressure placed upon this class.

Lowery used this lens to analyze the actions that the upper classes would take, such as granting concessions and bringing others into the system to increase the costs of rejecting the system.

To explain this concept, Lowery utilized the example of when members of a lower status group are admitted into the University.

“Are you less likely to protest and riot against inequality?” he asked. “Probably, since you are now part of the system and have more to lose from destabilization,” he said.

Lowery explained that individuals are thereby more likely to strive to maintain the current establishment by virtue of reciprocity towards See PRIVILEGE page 2

U. Affiliates submit amicus briefs for abortion case

By Marcia Brown staff writer

University faculty and alumni have written amicus curiae briefs for both sides of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, the first major case regarding abortion to come before the Supreme Court in years. The case was argued on Wednesday.

The case arose in response to the 2013 Texas state law HB2 that set two new restrictions on abortion clinics. The restrictions require hospital admitting privileges to people performing abortions, and for designated abortion clinics to meet the standards of

Blumerman, Moffett discuss census

By Hannah Waxman staff writer

A student is learning how to make a mug at Wilson Ceramics Studio.

In Opinion

Today on Campus

CHIARA FICARELLI :: ASSOCIATE PHOTO EDITOR

Contributing Columnist Luke Gamble examines the polarizing nature of the U.S. presidential candidates, and an anonymous contributor reflects on how the Princeton environment has taken a toll on their mental health.

PAGE 3

or-break-it case,” Trussell said.

He explained that if the plaintiffs lose, the case would set a nationwide precedent that shortsighted restrictions could be put in place. If there is a tie, the restrictions may still stay in effect in Texas, but not for the country as a whole. In the situation that the plaintiffs win, similar restrictions in other states would be struck down.

The case will define “undue burdens” previously established in the landmark 1973 case, Roe v.

Wade.

Jennifer Dalven, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s See BRIEF page 2

LECTURE

In the 2020 census, the US Census Bureau plans to use new technologies to tackle challenges such as a declining response rate and economic restraints, Lisa Blumerman, associate director of the Decennial Census Programs said at a lecture on Wednesday.

The Census asks ten basic questions about age, sex, race and other identifiers. Blumerman said that the 2020 Census will be unlike any that has been taken before. Other topics and questions will be submitted to Congress in 2017, but in the meantime, cognitive testing is being conducted to consider including a separate Middle Eastern and North African category.

“We’ve had a unique opportunity to test, to research, to look at how we can use data in ways that we’ve never used it before,” she added.

She explained that the Census’ purpose is to conduct a census of population and housing and disseminate results to the President, the states, and the American people. The overall goal for the census is to count everyone once, only once, and in the right place.

The Bureau is currently working to enumerate 330 million people, living in 140 million housing units, at a lower cost than required by the 2010 methodology. Blumerman said that

ARTS

ambulatory surgical centers, according to Professor Emeritus of economics and public affairs and the Charles and Marie Robertson Professor emeritus of Public and International Affairs at the Center for Health and Wellbeing at the University, James Trussell GS ’75.

Trussell, along with several University graduates, including Diana Foster GS ’98 and former postdoctoral fellow in the Office of Population Research Kelli Hall, co-signed an amicus brief in support of Whole Woman’s Health, the plaintiffs of the case who provide abortion services.

“This case is clearly a make-it-

the Bureau expects to have a cost reduction of $5.2 billion, and estimates that it would have cost $17.8 billion to conduct using old 2010 methods.

“We’ve designed a census to take those cost-drivers into account, to bring technology into the life cycle and to allow us to ensure that we have high quality data,” Blumerman said.

Nonetheless, the Census faces several challenges moving forward, she said. Most significant of these challenges is the presence of rapidly changing technology. In fact, plans for the 2020 Census began before the 2010 Census was conducted.

A second challenge that the Bureau faces is taking into consideration the constraints of the economic environment. In 2010, it was easy for the Bureau to hire the 600,000 numerators employed by the Bureau due to the 2008 financial crisis. For this census, an estimated 300,000 to 500,000 will be hired.

Furthermore, the Census has seen a declining response rate over the last 20 years. To counterbalance these declining response rates, the Bureau has identified ways to maximize efficiency and address the problems facing the Census. One such method addresses the reengineering of address canvassing, that is, ways to counteract people who do not respond. Secondly, the Bureau will use a technology that allows them to do a full sweep of the nation

4:30 p.m.: Eileen Claussen, first president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, will present a lecture titled, “A History of Climate Change Policy: Evolution, Devolution, Revolution.” Robertson Hall.

in office rather than having employees go house to house, according to Blumerman.

“What we’re looking to do here is to use technology to more efficiently and effectively manage the 2020 Census field work,” Blumerman said.

The 2020 Census will become mobile; using the COMPASS Mobile Application, numerators will be able to collect data from non-response citizens who do not fill out the census either online, by phone or by mail, according to Evan Moffett, assistant division chief for the Census Bureau.

The Bureau has also identified other ways to streamline and modernize the Census. New technology will allow the Census to provide up to 11 language choices online, including those that use non-Roman alphabets such as Chinese and Korean.

Finally, Moffett noted that the Bureau is also looking into how to deal with issues of fraud.

“Fraud is not going to be a significant problem for the 2020 Census, but we have to put in place some intelligent systems to allow us to detect systematic problems that are going on,” he said.

The lecture took place in 300 Wallace Hall at 4:30 p.m. It was sponsored by the Princeton Survey Research Center and Office of Population Research.

WEATHER

By Jessica Li

HIGH

41˚

LOW

28˚

Partly cloudy. chance of rain:

0 percent

The Daily Princetonian

page 2

Thursday march 3, 2016

Trussel: Anybody with a brain would Knowles: Dismantling argue against abortion restrictions hierarchical system of BRIEF privilege very difficult Continued from page 1

.............

Reproductive Freedom Project, wrote in a statement that, “the case before the Supreme Court concerns two Texas abortion restrictions that would shut down 3/4 of the clinics in the state.”

ACLU executive director Anthony Romero ’87 was unavailable for comment.

Matthew Franck, director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute, said that the impact will mostly be restricted to Texas and states with conservative legislatures.

Along with Bradford Wilson, executive director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at the University, Franck co-signed an amicus brief in support of the defendant — the Texas Department of State Health — that “covers the federalism angle,” he said. Wilson deferred comment to Franck.

Franck said that he is pro-life and would like to see Roe V. Wade revisited and overturned, but that this is not what this case is about.

“Respect for federalism means respect for difference, because the Constitution allows leeway for different policies even on very important issues like to this to be pursued by different states,” Franck said.

He added that there should be a checkerboard of different levels of regulation, some of which already exists.

“I support Texas regulation in part because I think it will reduce the number of abortions performed in Texas,” Franck said, “The Texas legislature is trying to put abortion clinics out of business that they think are slipshod and dangerous to women.”

Yet, Texas is just the tip of the iceberg, Dalven wrote in a statement.

“Most people don’t know this, but in the last five years, states have quietly passed 288 restrictions on access to abortion,” he said.

Trussell noted that some women are already traveling hundreds of miles for an abortion clinic and more will find themselves in the situation if the restrictions are upheld.

Trussell said you don’t have to go beyond the authors of the bill to show that the intentions of these restrictions are to close clinics, as the authors said “quite frankly.”

Office of Population Research postdoc research associate Abigail Aiken, another signatory on an amicus brief supporting Whole Woman’s Health, said that though this case will not reverse the legally protected right of women to choose an abortion, it will make practice of that right extremely difficult or impossible.

“The Supreme Court has recognized that abortion is a constitutional right,” Dalven said. “But a right without access is no right at all. That is why it is so important that the Court strike down these laws.”

Trussell said that the new restrictions on the Texas clinics don’t make abortions any safer and that the procedure is already extremely safe. He said that there are riskier procedures that are performed without these restrictions, like colonoscopies.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz ’92, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and 172 other members of Congress signed a brief supporting the prolife side of the case.

Trussell said that Cruz “doesn’t believe in science.”

“I don’t think that anybody re-

ally, who has a brain, actually, could argue that these restrictions improve women’s health,” Trussell said. “How could they possibly? They’re not designed to do that. They look like they’re doing that and they’re deliberately designed to sound good, but when one looks at it or one thinks about it for even a nanosecond, one realizes it’s just preposterous.”

Cruz’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Franck said the brief he signed cites previous precedents asking the court to be mindful of things it ruled for previously.

“Legislatures are both more representative and more informed to make those kinds of decision,” Franck said. “It’s really not good for the health of our democracy or constitution for judges to pretend in the name of the Constitution [that] they get to make those very diminutive judgments about those policy questions.”

However, Trussell noted that the problem is that many justices turn to their own preconceptions when it comes to the issue of abortion.

“I think we’re all extremely worried,” Trussell said.

Franck said that there’s a network of scholars and lawyers who write these amicus curiae briefs that asked Wilson and Franck to sign. He said that this brief had 24 signatories, among them scholars of federalism and experienced law professors, such as Stanford Law Professor and director of the Stanford Constitutional Law Center Michael McConnell.

Trussell said there are dozens of briefs for both sides, notably including pro-choice briefs from 100 lawyers testifying that an abortion at a young age allowed them to finish their education and establish their careers.

PRIVILEGE Continued from page 1

.............

the establishment that granted them this benefit. On a greater scale, such concessions build up and decrease individuals’ personal motivations to collectively oppose the establishment.

“People as a whole tend to be egocentric creatures … it would take a huge show of altruism to give up privilege in favor of equality.”

Brian Lowery,

Stanford behavioral Scientist

Lowery added that these concessions have great implications, such as in relation to the presidential primaries, in how the elite are more likely to preserve the status quo, while those towards the bottom of the hierarchy are more likely to vote for a destabilizing candidate who would initiate change.

Eric Knowles, associate professor of psychology at New York University, explained racial privilege phenomena, such as the denial of white privilege, through the lens of individual

in-groups, or groups that a particular member belongs to.

“White privilege is a selfthreat, as it is a truism that people want to take credit for their success and avoid blame for their failures,” he said.

To acknowledge their privilege, individuals would discount their personal success and enhance the weight of their failures, he added.

To highlight the ways in which individuals deal with the concept of privilege, Knowles noted statistical evidence from many psychological studies to form the “3D Model” of privilege: Deny, Distance, Dismantle.

In this model, when individuals are faced with their privilege, they will attempt to either deny the existence of this privilege, disassociate themselves from their privileged identity, or choose to move forward in dismantling this hierarchical system of privilege.

Both Lowery and Knowles noted the difficulty in dismantling this concept of privilege and its pervasive existence through a hierarchical society.

“People as a whole tend to be egocentric creatures … it would take a huge show of altruism to give up privilege in favor of equality,” Lowery said.

This discussion, titled “Zen and the Art of Privilege Maintenance”, was part of the talks of the Inequality Science Series. It was held in A32 Peretsman Scully Hall at 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday. All talks are live-streamed and hosted on the African American Studies Department website. The next talk in this series will take place on Apr. 20.

Zuckerman: No one is unsafe at University HEARING Continued from page 1

.............

“race traitor,” he added.

According to Zuckerman, when a white POCC member pointed out the hypocrisy of certain racially-driven demands in a campus publication, a group of black protestors screamed at her and demanded she not be allowed to participate in a campus forum about the issue.

Numerous students have confided to POCC about their opposition to the demands raised last November but are afraid of being subjected to attacks, Zuckerman said.

“This is what we are seeing today. These demands haven’t even been implemented. Imagine what would happen if the University itself were to vindicate the protestors’ worldview and thereby reinforcing the notion that those who disagree need to be reeducated,” he noted.

Zuckerman also rebutted an op-ed written in the Daily Princetonian by one of the students who organized the protest.

In the op-ed, the student claimed that freedom of thought, when threatening to the safety of others, should not be tolerated.

But no one is unsafe at Princeton, Zuckerman said, citing that there has not been a single instance of violence and no one is calling for the subjugation of minorities. Anyone who does so will be condemned, he said.

Though free speech currently enjoys protection at Princeton, protesters are seeking to change that, Zuckerman said, adding that protecting free speech is a

mission that should transcend partisan ideals.

George noted a lack of viewpoint diversity among faculty as the problem for campus illiberalism.

There’s great value in intellectual diversity, he said, citing the positive impacts of the James Madison Program that he founded 15 years ago. “[Many] praise the Madison program for turning monologues into campus dialogues,” he said.

Debates stemming from a difference in viewpoints from multiple scholars make a more enriched learning environment, George noted.

George also noted that he co-taught a seminar with former University professor Cornel West GS ’80, a scholar who George identified as at the leftend of the political spectrum.

“Professor West and I cooperate across the lines of ideology division and political difference in the common project of seeking truth,” he said.

The seminar, which presented a diverse array of writings, including those by Socrates and C.S. Lewis, through multiple perspectives, taught students the value of respect and civility, George said.

“The spirit of truth seeking […] is a spirit open to the possibility that one may in fact, be wrong,” George said.

The hearing, titled “Protecting the Free Exchange of Ideas on College Campuses,” took place Wednesday morning at 10 a.m. in room 1100 of the Longworth House Office Building and lasted about two hours.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

The Daily Princetonian is published daily except Saturday and Sunday from September through May and three times a week during January and May by The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., 48 University Place, Princeton, N.J. 08540. Mailing address: P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542. Subscription rates: Mailed in the United States $175.00 per year, $90.00 per semester. Office hours: Sunday through Friday, 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Telephones: Business: 609-375-8553; News and Editorial: 609-258-3632. For tips, email news@dailyprincetonian.com. Reproduction of any material in this newspaper without expressed permission of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Copyright 2014, The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Daily Princetonian, P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542.

Opinion

Thursday march 3, 2016

page 3

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

On finding unity in political plurality

Sometimes, I want to end it Anonymous

guest columnist

Editor’s note: The author of this column was granted anonymity due to the intensely personal nature of the events described.

S

ometimes, I want to end it. Sometimes, life feels like a story where I’m not even my own protagonist.

Sometimes at Princeton, I had trouble sleeping, but I also had trouble getting up. I had a personal issue of pegging myself to others like a fixed exchange rate or something. If they went up, I had to sell all my reserves until I went broke, just trying to keep up. I thought I was evil for wishing people would stop rising so far above me. I kept trying to tell myself that I would have my friends be successful than strangers, but those words rang empty in the face of the boiling rage and underlying shame I felt when people bragged about their accomplishments. Soon, I was feeling that even in the face of other people experiencing genuine happiness.

I had this notion of “strictly better than,” like people were a basket of qualities that people could assign complete preference to. If a dining hall cake was strictly better than the untouched cookies, why did the cookies exist? And if someone was strictly better than me, why should I exist? There were just so many categories to lose in. And if I looked hard enough at my own subpar pictures on Facebook, or my increasingly hateable face in the mirror, I could make my mind believe I was a loser in everything.

The funny thing is, I remember back when I received the Orange Tiger screen as a high school senior – I thought my life was made. Now that I’m here, it doesn’t feel that way. But when I think about it, I am so fortunate to even be here. Maybe my entire happiness range just moved up the scale, so that I think every relationship drama is the end of the world, whereas people at any other school may have to worry about how to cover food next year or tuition, without full financial aid.

So I try to remember that when things are good, it’s good. When things are bad, it’s good too, because it means I’m surviving.

I’m a survivor. And I’m trying to find little things that used to make me happy, like going to the gym or seeing people laugh.

Maybe there really is no point to existing if I’m not the best at anything. But is anyone? Even if there existed the “strict” best person in the entire world – what reason do they have over the rest of us to deserve life? Maybe the best of the best can touch a million or a billion lives, but in the end, it’s just transient souls easing this transient process for other transient souls. If life were a state function, it would be the same if I had jumped out my bedroom window in high school or if I died at 80.

But I still want to do it. It’s crazy – we’re all just silly little people struggling and striving, exerting all our effort in the things we choose to care about between birth and death. Like drawing lines in the sand, there’s really nothing to show – but, somehow, I feel like it’s different. I just have to remember that when it’s too hard to get up.

vol. cxl

Do-Hyeong Myeong ’17

Luke Gamble

editor-in-chief

contributing columnist

I

Daniel Kim ’17

business manager

n every election cycle, pundits and politicians alike assert that the United States is at a unique moment in history, a tilting point. No, I’m not going to argue that this time, “it’s for real.” What is striking about this election cycle, however, is how polarizing the candidates in both parties are. In the 113th Senate, Bernie Sanders was the third most liberal senator, and Cruz the fourth most conservative, with Rubio only a few spaces behind. For lack of many specific policy proposals or any voting record whatsoever, Donald Trump cannot be placed on this spectrum, but in his own way, he represents the same approach. That is one of uncompromising commitment to, in his case, his own self and outlook, but in the senators’ cases, to their own convictions and points of view.

After the primaries, the remaining candidates tend to drift closer to the middle in order to woo voters from across the aisle.

Hillary’s success on Super Tuesday shows a trend towards moderatism on the Democratic side. If Hillary can stay off her email for a few months, she may be the only viable candidate come November. However, Cruz, Rubio, Sanders and Trump have never demonstrated the capacity to work meaningfully with those who differ from them ideologically.

In society at large, uncompromising ideologies usually balance themselves out and are a sign of a healthy plurality. Various interests and ideas compete with one another, resulting in a policy outcome that is reasonably close to the center. It’s not perfect, but it’s safe. It’s democratic, so it’s bureaucratic, but it prevents gross injustices on either side. Such plurality is the foundation that the United States is built on. The first pilgrims came to the United States because the governing body of England would not allow for religious diversity. Society depends on the assumption that the government not only accepts, but also represents, differing opinions.

A candidate who refuses to consider and validate points of view from differing parties is too myopic to be President of the United States. It constitutes a refusal to engage in meaningful dialogue with those he or she may disagree with, and an inability to recognize the validity of thought processes and opinions that run contrary to one’s own.

While every president has his or her own predispositions and will be recognized as red or blue, his or her job is not to simply push the country to the right or to the left. A candidate who does not respect the fact that nearly half

of the country will differ in political beliefs, who does not recognize that this means he no longer represents solely one party or ideology, who does not realize that he or she needs to mediate on behalf of the entire population, that candidate will be completely ineffective as president.

Barring the fact that such a close-minded approach would render bill passing impossible, foreign policy based on such thoughtless devotion to ideology or philosophy – either past or present – would be inadequate to handle the complex and interconnected international issues that beg the administration’s attention every day.

If Donald Trump cannot recognize that not all Mexicans are rapists, that even if unlawful immigration is a crime, in some circumstances it occurs, in the words of “weak” Jeb Bush, as “an act of love,” and that this ought to be taken into consideration when considering immigration reform, then Trump demonstrates a complete and utter inability to recognize the arguments on the other side of this issue.

But he’s not the only one who is forcing black-and-white interpretations on nuanced and complex issues. In the same vein, if Bernie Sanders can’t recognize that even if world peace should depend on the United States, that presently the U.S military must continue to play a role abroad, then he is not rooted in reality, but in his own imagined utopia. It may be a worthy dream, but it is a fantasy nonetheless. Similarly, Cruz’s refusal to aid a compromise on a 2014 fiscal budget lay at the crux of the 16-day government shutdown.

The president is not a dictator. He or she is not to use brute force or threats to realize a vision for the country. The role entails compromise, negotiation and, maybe, even failure in pursuit of long-term success. The glorious promises of the campaign trail must settle into subtle, but conscientious, decisionmaking about what can be done to tackle issues facing constituents.

Every election will make promises, but let’s remember what the office of the President can actually do so we may begin to move beyond paying attention to the self-aggrandizing campaigns. Then we can consider who will work to tear down barriers dividing and paralyzing Congress, rather than build walls, not just along our borders, but also around the Oval Office.

Luke Gamble is a sophomore from Eagle, Idaho. He can be reached at ljgamble@princeton.edu.

140TH MANAGING BOARD managing editor Caroline Congdon ’17 news editors Jessica Li ’18 Shriya Sekhsaria ’18 Christina Vosbikian ’18 Annie Yang ’18 opinion editor Jason Choe ’17 sports editor David Liu ’18 street editor Harrison Blackman ’17 photography editor Rachel Spady ’18 video editor Elaine Romano ’19 web editor Clement Lee ’17 chief copy editors Grace Rehaut ’18 Maya Wesby ’18 design editor Crystal Wang ’18 associate opinion editors Newby Parton ’18 Sarah Sakha ’18 associate sports editors Nolan Liu ’19 David Xin ’19 associate street editor Danielle Taylor ’18 associate photography editors Ahmed Akhtar ’17 Atakan Baltaci ’19 Mariachiara Ficarelli ’19 associate chief copy editors Megan Laubach ’18 Omkar Shende ’18 associate design editor Jessica Zhou ’19 editorial board chair Cydney Kim ’17 cartoons editor Rita Fang ’17

NIGHT STAFF 3.2.16 staff copy editors Sarah Kim ’17 Samantha Zalewska ‘19

Splendid Wednesday ryan budnick ’16 ..................................................

The P/D/F option can save Michael Barry

Y

esterday, 17 students published a convincing letter in support of Professor Michael Barry. I have never met the man, but I am convinced that dismissing him would be wrongheaded. No one at the University can replace his expertise.

A student familiar with Barry’s courses told me that overly generous grading is a likely reason

Newby Parton

Associate opinion editor

for his dismissal. If this is true, perhaps the administration is right to show concern about his grading practices. According to the registrar, grades in his “Studies in Later Persian Literature” are based entirely on participation and an oral presentation.

But lenient grading per se is not a

compelling reason for dismissing a scholar. In order to preserve the value of A-level grades, the University can make Barry’s seminar P/D/F only.

This action has already been taken for creative writing classes, which remain as popular as ever and are vastly enriching to our students.

Newby Parton is a sophomore from McMinnville, TN. He can be reached at newby@princeton.edu.

Thursday march 3, 2016

Sports

page 4

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

Basketball chases Ivy League title

by Katherine Tobeason :: Staff Photographer The Princeton men’s basketball team had a pair of stellar performances this past weekend, defeating Columbia 88-83 and Cornell 74-60. The victories bring the Tigers’ win streak to eight games and leave them only half a game behind Yale in the Ivy League standings. With only three games remaining in the regular season, Princeton now controls its own destiny.

Tweet of the Day “The $6.35 charge for my coffee has woken me up more than any form of caffeine... Feeling: wronged” Annie Tarakchian (@ annabellyy5), senior guard, women’s basketball

Stat of the Day

8 games After beating Columbia and Cornell, the men’s basketball team has now won eight games in a row.

Follow us Check us out on Twitter on @princesports for live news and reports, and on Instagram on @ princetoniansports for photos!

Thursday march 3, 2016

The Daily Princetonian

page S1

PAGES DESIGNED BY HARRISON BLACKMAN :: STREET EDITOR

ARTISTIC CRITICISM Visiting The Frick Collection’s Van Dyck exhibit

This week, Street Editor HARRISON BLACKMAN ventures off campus to review The Frick Collection’s new exhibit, “Van Dyck: The Anatomy of Portraiture,” an exploration of the portraits of Flemish master Anthony Van Dyck. In the process, he learns about the New York art critic scene, what it means to review a world-class museum and what on Earth a phrase like “The Anatomy of Portraiture” means.

W

hen I found the invitation on my newsroom desk, I have to say I was kind of surprised. I mean, at ‘Street’ we occasionally receive promotions from dance companies in town or press clippings from the odd poet. But we don’t usually get invitations from major New York bastions of culture.

When a world-class art museum gives you a golden ticket to see a sneak preview of their new exhibit, then your course of action is pretty clear: you must go.

The museum was The Frick Collection in New York, the exhibit –“Van Dyck: The Anatomy of Portraiture.” And yes, both The Frick Collection and the Frick Chemistry Lab at Princeton are named after the same person: Henry Clay Frick, captain of industry and philanthropist of the Gilded Age. I visited The Frick Collection for a lot of reasons. The first and simplest was a desire to review the exhibit and fulfill the obligation conferred in receiving an invite from such an institution.

But I had deeper questions – what was the New York art critic scene like? What information could I bring back that would be relevant to the Princeton community? Who exactly was Van Dyck? And what on earth does the “Anatomy of Portraiture” mean?

Combined with the eating club image, the message felt familiar.

I signed in and walked into the atrium, a classical proposition that evokes the sense of what a 19th century shopping mall would look like, with steel and yellowed, opaque glass protecting the room from the elements.

Upon reading about the Frick’s origins online, I learned that the building was originally Mr. Frick’s home. You have to be doing pretty well to live in a mansion on 5th Avenue.

at hand: I can’t leave out the fact that there were snacks, or at least one snack –of Flemish wafers, best described as a cross between a waffle and a cookie.

So being a New York art critic is a quiet, formal affair with liberal photography policies. Its humble perks include the opportunity to sample Flemish baking.

A portrait of the exhibit a day before it opened The exhibit features the work of a man who Princeton stuWhat being an art critic is like dents can probably relate to –a I walked into the exhibit –and prodigy who also happened to pretty much uncharted territo- be a social climber. Born in Antry. I had never critiqued a major werp in 1599, Anthony Van Dyck museum’s exhibit before. Uncer- quickly established himself as a tain of the process of such an preeminent portrait artist at the endeavor, I started out small: by age of 20. By 1632, Van Dyck was looking at the paintings. I won- selected as the chief painter in dered if I was allowed to take pic- Charles I’s court, the last king of tures. Then I saw that someone England before the English Civil else was. So then I took pictures, War. Like so many great artists, and examined paintings, not- Van Dyck died young, at the age ing that the majority of major of 42, just before the English New York art critics were of a Civil War. In considering his rewiser age, so I stuck out like a gal position, this probably saved sore thumb. Most interestingly, him some misery. people didn’t talk to each other The Frick Collection’s exhibit all that much. The various jour- is described as “one of the most nalists sometimes chatted with comprehensive exhibits ever ora couple of their friends, but for ganized as a portraitist,” accordthe most part, there was no net- ing to one of the museum’s press working involved. releases. The exhibit is divided There was a tour led by the into two sections – the first, of exhibit curators, in which they Van Dyck’s drawings and studled a group of about 40 critics ies, and the second, his major into a 100-square foot hallway. portraits before and during his Welcome to The Frick Collec- Even a diplomat from Flanders involvement with the English tion was there, given Flanders’ con- Court. The decision to split the Upon entering, I noted how tributions to the exhibition of its two exhibits is architecturally the Frick’s entryway has the native artist, Van Dyck. I had no suited to the exhibit space, as same affected grandeur as our idea that a province of Belgium the paintings occupy the more very own eating clubs. There’s a could possess its own cultural grand galleries on the ground big wooden door, and columns, foreign policy. It’s like a state floor while the drawings adorn and a seal with an interlocking senator from California giving the walls of the basement gal“FC” logo. On the day I visited, out a thousand John Steinbeck leries. there was even a sign saying, novels to a school system in BraLike Princeton students in “Open to only invited guests.” zil. To return, then to the matter composing their academic essays, Van Dyck knew how to get things done q u ic k l y.

Van Dyck’s draw ings are interesting in that very few of his studies of faces (drafts or informational practice pai nti ngs to inform larger canvasses) survive, and it’s because he was trying to meet HARRISON BLACKMAN::STREET EDITOR The Frick Collection’s interior atrium, left, and a self-portrait of Van Dyck, right. the demand of

COURTESY OF HISTORYEXTRA.COM

Anthony Van Dyck’s portrait of Charles I and his wife Maria. being the most popular portraitist of his time and had to turn around his work as fast possible. As a result, he didn’t paint too many drafts.

As for Van Dyck’s completed portraits, I noticed a distinct difference between his more formal, regal portraits and more intimate, naturalized portraits HARRISON BLACKMAN::STREET EDITOR that reminded Van Dyck’s portrait of Margaret Lemon, his mistress. me of photographs from National Geographic. Of par- portraits of his friends makes ticular note is the dichotomy Van Dyck an interesting figbetween Van Dyck’s enchanting ure – one well suited for colportrait of his mistress, Marga- lege students used to analyzret Lemon, and the more dis- ing work and comparing it to tanced portrait of his wife, Mary other things.

Van Dyck. Margaret Lemon’s “We are good at dissecting portrait has a “Mona Lisa” / “Girl images, thinking about the with a Pearl Earring” expression, ideology of images, and he’s while Lady Van Dyck holds up appealing for that reason,” a crucifix necklace to prove her Eaker said. “He’s also someone Catholicism. I took up Adam who thought across media in Eaker, one of the exhibit’s cura- a very modern way, so he’s not tors, on this. just thinking about the fin“It seems that Van Dyck ished painting but also how it had certain sitters for whom can be reproduced and distribhe had a real affinity, and in uted across print, and today’s those cases he could be looser artists are often not tied to and freer and maybe express a single movement anymore. himself a little bit more,” Eak- We’re in a moment that’s very er said. “When we are looking excited by moving across those at portraits of fellow artists, lines and blurring them.” friends, the women in his life, I suppose that Dyck’s varthose are often some of the ied and interdisciplinary apmost exciting portraits to a proach to portraiture constimodern eye because of that tutes its “anatomy.” As for The looseness and freedom that he Frick Collection, it’s definitely had.” worth your while if you have It’s not often in exhibits time to venture up from the you can see who the artist re- Orange Bubble. As for my first ally liked. The strong distinc- stint as an art critic – when in tion in style between the regal the company of art critics, do portraits for Charles I and his as the art critics do… keep to court and the more modern yourself.

The Daily Princetonian

Q&A

Thursday march 3, 2016

GEOSCIENCES PROFESSOR JORGE SARMIENTO Interviewed by

ANGELA WANG Staff Writer

D

epartment of Geosciences professor Jorge Sarmiento is one of the leading oceanographers in the world and the lecturer for GEO 202: Ocean, Atmosphere and Climate. From March 14-15, a conference named “Modeling the Living Planet” honoring Sarmiento’s storied career and 70th birthday will be held in the Taylor Auditorium of Frick Chemistry Lab. Street Staff Writer Angela Wang sat down with Prof. Sarmiento to talk about his research, the symposium and his experience teaching GEO 202.

Daily Princetonian: What research do you consider most important?

Jorge L. Sarmiento: My biggest project is a combination of my career in many ways.

It’s very difficult to measure the ocean because the water is opaque to most radiation, so you can’t measure properties in the water that goes down as deep as six kilometers and deeper without physically going there and collecting water samples of nutrients and measuring them.

But in recent years, oceanographers solved the problem of going out to the ocean by instrumenting Autonomous Robotic Floats called ARGO f loats, which park at about a kilometer’s depth, [...] where the water motions are served at the minimal, so they try and keep them roughly where they put them in. Every ten days, they will send down to two kilometers, turn down a whole bunch of instruments to measure temperature, salinity and pressure, f loat all the way to the surface, pop out an antenna and send all their data by iridium. It’s then

available on the Internet almost instantaneously.

The whole ARGO network began 10-15 years ago, and there are now about 4,000 of those f loats, all over the world.

Meanwhile, we’ve done a lot of research in the Southern Ocean, the ocean that borderlines the Antarctic, in which we found that it’s massively important for global issues. It soaks up a quarter of the carbon that we are putting into the atmosphere. It also soaks up three quarters of the heat that we are putting into the ocean. The earth is warming up at a slowing rate because the water bodies are absorbing 98 percent of the heat, and about three quarters of that is taken up by the Southern Ocean. The water’s old and cold because the water comes from the deep water [mass] and comes up to the surface.

This is where the deep water kind of empties out and fills in from the North Atlantic. If it is filling up, it must be emptying out. Where it’s emptying out is by moving upward and moving southward. About 80 percent of the emptying occurs, and the water is 1,000 years old or older. It’s very cold and very rich in nutrients.

That’s why it’s so important in absorbing carbon dioxide and heat and feeding nutrients back into the ocean.

We know very little about how this actually occurs, since we have little observation down there, due to the harsh conditions. But now we are putting f loats down there, and these f loats survive under the ice and we are getting all the nutrient cycling and everything down there for the first time.

It’s really extraordinary. The f loats will stop five meters below the water surface if it

is freezing, and repeat and store up to two years of data in themselves. More often, they pop up every year and send us the data. It’s just amazing. I think this is the most exciting observation data I’ve ever been involved in. It’s a revolution taking place in the field, and I am extremely lucky to be the director of it.

DP: Could you discuss the conference during spring break?

JS: Well, I am not going to a conference. My group, unbeknownst to me, went out and made a plan for the celebration of my birthday. They raised funding, invited people and told me about it—before it was too late for me to intervene!

It’s something very nice. A lot of postdocs and students I’ve had over the years are coming. Technically, it will be a conference because everybody will be giving a research presentation. There are four basic topics that are all related to research that I’ve done, and they all work in parallel.

almost 100 students signed up for it. I was f labbergasted. I dropped everything and had to rethink how to present the lecture to such a large group.

I made some special effort to try and meet the students, because that’s what I enjoy being able to do with a small class.

Everyday, I would have office hours for an hour and spend 10-15 minutes meeting with a student individually. Having 98 people is different from teaching a small class, so I switched it back to 9 a.m., and the number dropped back to 25-26. Then the department de-

cided to reorganize the curriculum, and made it a true 200 level course for science majors. Ever since then, it’s been a group of 20 or so students.

The last two years, the majority of the class ended up majoring in geosciences. We put more math in and had plenty of problem sets already. All students are required to take the lab, which, in the past, hadn’t been the case. Students could take the A or the B option, with the lab or without the lab. It’s just great to see these students in the department now.

DP: Can you tell me about GEO 202 that you teach for undergraduates?

JS: “Introduction to Oceanography” is a course that I’ve been teaching for the past couple of years. The course was started by our current department chair, Elizabeth Sword, who had taught it in the past.

It’s had a funny history. It started off as a course for scientists and non-scientists -people could take labs or not.

I had it early in the morning, at 9 a.m., and for several years it typically had 20 students or so. One year, I thought to try a different time and see if it had an impact on it, so I switched it to 11-12:20. All of a sudden,

COURTESY OF PRINCETON.EDU

Q&A ‘1080P’ CO-FOUNDER NICK SEXTON ‘17 CATHERINE WANG Staff Writer

A

visual journalism group named ‘1080p’ seeks to document campus life through short videos and photo essays, and is one of Princeton’s newest student organizations. Street sat down with Nick Sexton ‘17, one of the organization’s co-founders, to discuss the club’s background and goals.

Daily Princetonian: What inspired you guys to create ‘1080p’?

Nick Sexton ‘17: Our organization goes by “ten-eighty p,” which refers to HD video resolution. We, as an organization, focus on visual journalism – so that’s jour-

COURTESY OF’1080P’

nalism through the form of video and photo essays. We decided to form as a student group because we know that there’s a lot of organizations on campus that do journalism, like the ‘Prince’, the Nass and others. But we felt like most of them don’t have a very robust visual journalism section, and so we thought that, given the rise of things like New York Times’ video section and other outlets that put an emphasis on visual content, Princeton’s campus needs something similar. So that’s what we’re trying to add to Princeton’s campus: an organization that allows people who may not have prior training with video cameras and photography to use our equipment and partner with people in our organization who already have that experience.

DP: Can you tell me more about some of ‘1080p’’s videos or photojournalism projects?

NS: We were founded at the start of the fall semester, and had our official launch at the beginning of the spring semester. Throughout the fall semester, we were preparing content for our launch. Now we have about seven or eight videos that are up on the site, and one or two photo essays so far. They’re on a really diverse range of topics. We had a profile of 2 Dickinson Street [Co-op], which is an

alternative eating option for upperclassmen on campus. We did a profile of the audition process for dance groups, focusing specifically on BodyHype. We followed them through their pickups, and talked to someone who was previously denied from BodyHype and was subsequently let into the group. We did a profile of WPRB, which is the radio station on campus. We also did a profile on Revival Culture, which is a worship group on campus that meets in Campus Club’s basement.

Our goal is to show people parts of Princeton that they might not have a chance to see. We want to provide a lens into different communities that will allow for more mutual understanding on different parts of campus. For example, my co-founder Will [Gansa ‘17] is helping spearhead a project now that is going to be an oral history and reflection on the Black Justice League (BJL) protests at Nassau Hall and the formation of the Princeton Open Campus Coalition. What he’s doing is to get an objective stance, he’s talking to someone from the University Press Club who covered the event, as well as people from the Princeton Open Campus Coalition and the BJL. He plans to present, as objectively as possible, [...] a retelling of the event. Our inspiration for wanting to make this specific project is that we felt that many people on both sides got a lot of misinformation about what was happening at Nassau Hall.

DP: What challenges have you experienced while working on ‘1080p’?

NS: Some of the specific challenges of doing video journalism

is that video takes longer to produce than say writing a news article for the ‘Prince.’ So I think that there’s a longer production time, so that is one specific challenge that we recognize, and I think that that’s one of the big reasons why other publications on campus have not been able to sustain their video and photo departments as much as they’d like to. That’s something we’re cognizant of and working against.

DP: What is the overall process for creating content?

NS: The way we’re structured so far is that we have weekly meetings on Monday nights at 8:30 p.m. at Frist. At those weekly meetings, we let people pitch their ideas, and we want it to be as collaborative of a process as possible, so everyone will give their feedback and suggestions for different ideas. If people are particularly interested in a given project, then they’ll tack their name onto it and hopefully assist in the production of it. That’s generally how it’s been so far. We don’t have a rigid set of rules, so it’s not like, “this person will hold the sound, you do the lighting.” The idea is more to create groups of people who are interested in doing the same story who can support each other, because we know that people are coming in with different skill-sets and different interests.

DP: What are your plans for the

COURTESY OF’1080P’

future of ‘1080p’?

NS: Like I’ve said before, so far we like to focus on parts of campus that maybe mainstream campus might not understand too well. So for example, we’ve thought about doing a profile on married students on campus, which is something that I think people might be interested in because it’s such a small demographic at Princeton.

At the same time, we’re not only interested in creating content that’s very niche that only focuses on a small base of people. We’re also interested in doing things that are related to “mainstream Princeton,” whether it’s the eating clubs or campus-wide events.

However, we are not striving to be an organization that covers the daily news. We’re instead striving to be an organization that covers topics that are “evergreen,” so, for example, if you go and watch a video in a year, it will still be interesting to you.

Editor’s note: Co-founder Will Gansa ‘17 was also contacted for interview, but he declined to com-

page S3

Thursday march 3, 2016

THIS SIDE OF Princeton University Art Museum tour guide KATIE TYLER Contributor

L

ike many Princeton students, the very first time I set foot in the Princeton University Art Museum was during Frosh Week at the Nassau Street Sampler. Of course, the promise of free food was an enticing draw, but I was also genuinely curious about what the museum had to offer. I had just spent the summer in my hometown, where the most notable attraction is the local Chipotle. I could hardly believe that I was now going to live just a few steps away from a world-class museum (one of the benefits of living in Wilson, besides its proximity to late meal). Yet, when I arrived to the museum, I was immediately overwhelmed – not because of the huge crowds, but because I realized how little I knew about art. The two acquaintances that had invited me to come along were talking about their favorite Rothko paintings. I had never heard of Rothko before, and when we saw his work at one of the past Art Museum exhibits at the event, his paintings just seemed like plain old blocks of color to me.

Despite the intimidation I initially felt, the Art Museum became one of my favorite places on campus. And that’s

because I learned that talking about art can be easy (and fun).

A few days later, I came back to the museum for my freshman seminar, “Behind the Scenes: Inside the Princeton University Art Museum.”

Our professor, Caroline Harris, gave us a tour of the museum’s highlights. She brought us over to a Winslow Homer painting, “At the Window,” and started asking us questions about the details we noticed.

When we discussed the girl’s bright gold ring and the wilting flower at the windowsill, Prof.

Harris began to piece together a story. She explained to us how all these different details, in addition to some knowledge of Winslow Homer’s background, depict a young woman whose husband was recently lost at sea.

There was something about this explanation that clicked with me. I realized that I was just as capable as anyone else at noticing the compelling details of a piece of art. But I was still missing something. I observed how my professor was able to use her background to guide us into an interesting conversation about the backstory of the painting, a skill I wanted to learn.

So, after my freshman seminar concluded, I decided to apply to be an Art Museum student tour guide. The new guides

A LIGHTER SHADE OF ORANGE FRIST ROBERT DELUCA Contributor

“A Lighter Shade of Orange” is a new satirical series, a literary take on campus culture.

I

n the line, amongst my fellow animals, the smell of pepperoni pizza is overpowering. I don’t speak, and neither do my herd-mates. We grunt, occasionally, but it seems as though we have lost the power to form words.

A large figure in front of me gestures mutely at the heated tin of French fries. I move to the front of the line and somehow find the strength to whisper lovingly: “Tenders.”

My plate is filled with the most sensual, beautiful thing in the world.

I turn to leave. The watering hole is well attended today. Dozens of my fellows line tables. It is cold, but we are all sweaty. It was dark, but then the Lord said, “Let there be Frist,” and the world was flooded with fried food, fluorescence and tables.

As I checkout, I nod at the cashier, who smiles a thin-lipped smile. He has been swiping proxes non-stop since I entered the line, softly saying “charge” as each of us moved past him in exhausted half-stupor. More than one year’s tuition in chicken tenders and pizza has been sold in the last hour. Rah, Rah. I collapse into a chair, alongside some figures that I think I recognize. They appear to recognize me too, and nod their assent as I join them. I begin to devour my fried love.

The first bite fills me with a sense of divine bliss. I have never tasted anything so good. Dehydrated, grimy and barely human, I find solace in the taste of a chicken tender. My tablemates and I do not speak; I hope that they too have found relief.

Over in the corner, on a bench, someone is sleeping and someone else is sleeping on him. Occasional shouts and backslapping abound, but the specifics are lost on me.

A crowd comes down the stairs on all fours, half-running, halfstumbling. One of them trips, but catches himself on the banister and no one notices. They lumber into the galley with their eyes fixed on the food.

A burst of laughter erupts at the table next to us and then settles. Those at the table stare off into distance, lumpy smiles on their faces. Dumbly happy, fully

full of food.

The kitchen staff lounges while they put pizzas and tenders and fries together. They chuckle a bit at the sight of those in line; the proud Princeton students, usually so eager to impress, reduced to disinhibited, hungry animals.

We have finally become what the University was always telling us we were. Tigers. Siss Siss.

I am purring in happiness when one of my pack-mates says from across the table, “Hey, didn’t I see you at Terrace?”

I am shocked to hear a cohesive sentence. My other tablemates are busy feeding, and do not look up from their food.

“Uhh, yes,” I grunt out, annoyed at having to speak. “I was there.” I feel that I should not have to say more, but I abandon my herd-instinct and eke out, “It was ... good,” before taking another huge bite of chicken. Mhhm.

We in the herd have transcended the human condition to reach something better, something more honest. There is no need for speech here; we feel at home without it. My tablemate, satisfied by my curtness, returns to her own food, and I to mine.

I have been searching for fulfillment for years, and it turns out that poultry was the solution to all my problems. Poultry and company. I can feel the community. It fills the very air; we are all equal before Frist.

These chicken tenders, this room, are proof that we can surpass ourselves. We have freed ourselves from the shackles of Plato’s cave, have glimpsed the truth, felt the feelings of the Übermensch.

Boom, Boom.

One of our brothers finishes hurling into a nearby trashcan, and his nearest pack-mates are already taking care of him. I smile at the sight.

Here, in the Frist gallery, we have become whole. Before, we were nothing but parts, cogs, individuals. Now we are larger. Collective. Complete. Tigers do travel in packs.

I finish my tenders, and grunt in affirmation. My fellow packmates who have also finished answer my noise with guttural purring of their own, and we all rise together. Together, we wander out the double doors, leaving the rest of the herd behind to finish feeding. It is cold, but we are not bothered by it.

As we exit, we rear back on our hind legs and roar in triumph, marking the end of another evening. Ahhhhhh.

and I went through training during Intersession, where student outreach coordinator, Jessica Popkin, and curatorial assistant, Veronica White, along with many of the museum’s curators, taught us about the museum’s different collections.

We also spent a good amount of time practicing how to present material in an engaging way and ask thought-provoking questions.

My primary duty as a tour guide is to give “highlights” tours, where I show visitors featured pieces from many of the galleries. It’s impossible to capture the range of artwork the museum has on display in a single hour, but it’s my job to try!

The Art Museum has an ancient Egyptian mummy, an Aztec sacrificial stone, a Picasso sketch, three Monet paintings and several works from Andy Warhol.

We have one of the largest collections of Chinese calligraphy in the world! There are works of art from virtually all corners of the globe that span nearly every era in human history. One of my favorite things to do on campus (when I’m not busy) is to wander around the museum and find a new work of art, so my goal is to show visitors how much the museum has to offer so they will come back and explore on their own.

Usually when the museum

has a new temporary exhibition, the student tour guides are trained to give tours for special events. One of my favorite special tours is the flashlight tour of the outdoor sculptures around campus. It was incredibly interesting to learn about the different sculptures I pass by everyday. You probably have seen the turquoise figure-eight shaped sculpture (“Oval with Points”) located near Nassau Hall, but might have no idea that it’s actually modeled after an elephant skull.

One of the most exciting events is the Student Advisory Board’s annual gala, which featured the special exhibit “Cezanne and the Modern” this year, where tour guides are stationed at different areas of the gallery to talk about a specific painting. I spent the entire evening talking to dozens of visitors about a single ToulouseLautrec painting in which the artist painted himself urinating in a garden, and everyone had

something interesting to say about it. By hearing so many different people’s perspectives on that particular painting, I noticed details I would not have ordinarily discovered. And that’s ultimately my favorite part of being a tour guide at the Art Museum. I am grateful that I’ve had the chance to learn more about art from the museum’s outstanding staff, but I’ve learned just as much from talking to visitors about their fresh perspective on works of art I’ve stared at dozen of times.

COURTESY OF KATIE TYLER ‘18

Complicity in intimate violence in Theatre Intime’s ‘When Dawn Breaks’ CAROLYN BEARD Staff Writer

“

But how will this compare to the story you will hear tomorrow?” In their production of “When Dawn Breaks,” Theatre Intime presents an immersive theatrical experience and adaptation of “One Thousand and One Arabian Nights,” also known as “The Arabian Nights.”

The frame story concerns a great king cuckolded by his wife, who loses trust in all women and resorts to a brutal routine to quench his lustful desire and longing for perverse justice.

Marrying a young virgin each day and bedding her that night, the king orders that each one be executed in the morning before he marries the next.

Created and directed by Nico Krell ’18, the production focuses on the process by which Scheherazade comes to break the king’s cycle of intimate violence. Exploring the intersection of violence and sex, “When Dawn Breaks” questions whether the audience is complicit in the ancient tale.

The performance begins in Theatre Intime’s performance venue, Murray Theatre, where we find the queen (Julia Mosby ‘19) ‘in coitu’ with her brotherin-law. The king Shahrayr (Tom Dowling GS) soon enters the picture, violently breaking the two apart and presumably ordering their executions, as indicated by darkening lights and theatrical effects.

The experience quickly expands into the rest of the space, using the Charrier Room, dressing rooms and shop as playing spaces. Audience members are encouraged to follow the actors and move around the space, giving them autonomy to choose which actors to follow and which scenes to watch.

Multiple fights pepper the performance. Hands turn into claws and, in one fight, it seems as if Shah Zaman (Jake Hamel ‘18) goes in to kiss another before he begins to violently attack the man. Following this fight, which is accompanied by intense string music and blinding red light, Zaman is imprisoned in the booth at the back of the theater. He returns

to the ground and walks across the chairs to return to the stage, where two actors collapse backto-back and soon begin breathing in unison. Heads intertwining, it becomes clear that there is artistry in their movement and, five minutes later, the two use each other as support to stand up.

In another scene, actors put on a performance for the king, telling an eerily familiar story of a royal man who kills a young virgin at her marriage ceremony. A caricatured ballet, the performance is retold repetitively, mirroring the larger story of the king’s bedding one night and killing the next morning.

While Krell’s telling fails to emphasize the fact that Scheherazade actually volunteers to marry the king and presumably meet her death, in “When Dawn Breaks,” the process by which the king prepares for his night with the storyteller is nonetheless entrancing. We witness the king, after savagely eating an orange, washing and dressing himself. Scheherazade’s part here, in contrast, calls for the audience’s sympathy. As she enters the king’s bed chamber, we hear a woman – presumably a family member – wailing.

In one of the more remarkable scenes in a dressing room, an actress reveals drawers full of pictures of young women, women the king presumably married, bedded and then killed. While making the pictures into origami butterflies, the character played by Anna Zabel ‘19 explains that a butterfly, despite being a “weightless

ooze of meaningless parts” during metamorphosis, despite its entire body being ripped apart, “never really died.” Instead, “when the butterfly flaps its wings again, it becomes part of a story that never seems to end.”

“When Dawn Breaks” has its weak points. Though the interactive and immersive elements of the production are appealing, and each audience member can move around as he or she chooses, one gets a unique selection and sequence of scenes, making for a confusing, muddled melody of scenes, meaning no audience member leaves with a cohesive story. Music accompanying scenes often competes with a script that is, at times, sloppily constructed and the mixing of the modern and the ancient is off-putting.

Nonetheless, the magic is in the details. Small sketches of an evil-warding eye can be found throughout the playing space and, in some rooms, fresh flowers add a simple, but effective, level of sensory experience.

Other details – one character’s persistent smoking habit and another’s hand make-up – contribute to the production as well.

Despite the pitfalls of such an immersive experience, all in all, “When Dawn Breaks” excellently reveals the horrifying intersection of violence and sex in “The Arabian Nights” and questions the audience’s acceptance of the ancient tale at face value, finishing with the compelling and convicting question, “But how will this compare to the story you will hear tomorrow?”

COURTESY OF THEATRE INTIME

The Daily Princetonian

page S4

Naacho’s ‘Khwahish’ expresses desire Photos by

Thursday march 3, 2016

STREET’S

TOP TEN

JACK MAZZULO

Senior Staff Photographer

L

ast weekend, Naacho, Princeton’s South Asian dance company, performed its spring show in the Frist Performance Theatre. Named ‘Kwahish,’ the Urdu word for desire, the show performed a variety of South Asian dance styles, including classical, hip hop, Bollywood and folk. Several shows sold out. If you missed out on the show, or want to experience it all again, here’s a photostory from the event.

1 3 5 7 9

Midterms Headaches Midterms are next week.

2 4 6 8 10

Let the freak-out begin.

Frantically cram.

Realize thesis/JP/R2 deadlines are rapidly approaching.

MacBook charger dies.

The freak-out continues.

Spring break is just around the corner!

God save Christopher Ludwig Eisgruber, the first of his name.

Need to plan spring break vacation.

The freak-out never ends.

CAMPUS PICKS EVENT LEWIS CENTER FOR THE ARTS PRESENTS PERFORMANCE LAB Patricia and Ward Hagan ’48 Dance Studio, 185 Nassau Street Thursday, March 3 and Friday, March 4 at 7 p.m.

ASK THE SEXPERT This week, we discuss “female Viagra.”

Dear Sexpert,

I’ve heard there’s a female Viagra. As a woman, is this something that could help me when I when I’m interested in having sex, but can’t seem to get in the mood?

— Looking for Extra Help

Dear Looking for Extra Help,

Thanks for asking about a topic that has many misconceptions! It sounds like you are concerned about those times when your libido (desire for sex) might be lower than usual, something that happens to all of us at one time or another. Libido is quite complex, varies over time and person to person, and is influenced by a wide variety of things. Some of the things that affect sex drive are medications, comfort level with sexuality and - most especially - some parts of college life that we are all familiar with, like stress and lack of sleep.

The new medication, flibanserin (brand name, Addyi; colloquially known as “female Viagra”), is only for premenopausal women with a very specific diagnosis: hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD).

HSDD is a type of sexual dysfunction characterized by a persistent or recurrent lack or absence of sexual desire that causes marked distress and interpersonal difficulty. Before making this diagnosis, clinicians must determine that the absence of sexual desire cannot be explained by things such as mental disorders, a drug (legal or illegal), or some other factor, such as stress. Although both Addyi and Viagra are prescribed for sexual dysfunction, the

nickname “female Viagra” is very misleading. Viagra treats erectile dysfunction— the inability to develop or maintain an erection— and must be taken as needed before sexual encounters, but it does not stimulate sexual desire. Addyi, on the other hand, affects the central nervous system and the neurotransmitters in the brain, and is taken as a daily pill. It does have various side effects, most commonly dizziness, nausea and sleepiness. Drinking alcohol while using Addyi may cause severely low blood pressure and fainting, which is why those who use the drug are told not to drink alcohol at all and must sign a form stating that they will not do so.

As stated above, libidos are complex and affected by number of factors, which can lead to them being inconsistent. In short, sometimes you feel like it, sometimes you don’t. This variance in libido is entirely normal. Some people have no desire for sex at all ever, and that is okay. Each person’s libido is unique, and it is best not to compare one’s own libido to someone else’s. It takes time to figure out your sexuality and what is right for you, especially if you are just beginning to explore.

So, a low libido is a problem only if it is something that distresses you. If it does make you feel concerned or bothered, there are some steps you can take. If you think it is related to your relationship(s), it’s important to reflect upon and communicate with your partner(s) why you might be feeling the way you do. Talking openly with and feeling connected

to your partner(s) can improve intimacy.

Stress can contribute to low libido. So, with midterms around the corner, or a heavy academic workload this semester, you might find it harder to enjoy or become excited about sex. Depression and anxiety can also decrease libido, so you might consider talking with a professional at Counseling & Psychological Services about your emotional and mental health.

If you are taking certain medications like anti-depressants or oral contraceptives (“the Pill”) which can affect sex drive, then adjusting or changing medication might be the answer. Consult with your prescribing clinician before making any changes.

Or, maybe, using a lubricant will help.

All that said, variations in libido are fairly normal and there is no cause for concern unless you feel it is a source of distress in your life. If so, you may wish to make an appointment at Sexual Health and Wellness at UHS, where you can speak with a clinician about your specific needs and find out more information about possible options. Make an appointment online or by calling 609-258-3141.

— The Sexpert

Interested in Sexual Health? The Sexpert is always looking for members of the community to join the team of sexual health educators who, along with factchecking from University health professionals, help write these columns. Email sexpert@dailyprincetonian.com for more information and questions about sexual health.

HEADLINERS AND HEADSHAKERS headlines you didn’t read this week DAILY PRINCETONIAN STAFF U. professors work on NASA spaces hip to send Matthew McConaughey to an interstellar, fourth-dimensional bookshelf

E BREAKING: FORBES COLLEG E TO HEAVY EXPERIENCES FLOODING DU FLORIDA, STORM AND PROXIMITY TO FROM WHERE HURRICANES ARE

Doudna discusses science of gene-editing, splicing and copywriting for 3D printing known as ‘life’

Princeton Preview to be an overnight event once again, campus collectively thinks: let the party begin

NJ Gov. Christie allegedly used $10M in taxes to pay for bridge closure scandal, still not as awful as endorsing Donald Trump

U. professor faces revocation of Polish Order of Merit, copy of Polish themed “The Witcher III,” over controversial comments

The Lewis Center for the Arts presents Performance Lab, wherein students working in dance, writing, theater or visual arts can present interdisciplinary work, which the students have developed while having one-on-one discussions with both other artists and the dance faculty. This year, the Performance Lab features works by Princeton student artists. The event will take place this Thursday and Friday at 185 Nassau St. and is free and open to the public.BodyHype, BAC, diSiac and Princeton University Rock Ensemble. Tickets are free in Frist!

MUSIC COLUMBIA SHARP AND PRINCETON WILDCATS ARCH SING 1879 Arch Saturday, March 5 at 11p.m.

This Saturday, the Columbia SHARP all-male a cappella group will join the Wildcats, one of Princeton’s all-female a cappella groups, in an arch sing at 1879 Arch. The arch sing will begin at 11 p.m., and anyone can stop by and watch the groups perform for free!

MUSIC PUO PRESENTS MARCH 2016 CONCERTS Richardson Auditorium Friday, March 4 and Saturday, March 5 at 7:30 p.m.

This weekend, the Princeton University Orchestra will present a diverse program of repertoire featuring the winners of this year’s Concerto Competition, Solène Le Van ‘18, Evan Chow ‘16 and Jessie Chen ‘16. Works from Bernstein to Beethoven will be performed, and the Friday performance is free for students!

THEATER THE CJL PRESENTS 12 ANGRY JURORS Wilson Blackbox Theater Thursday, March 3 at 7:30 p.m., Saturday, March 5 at 8 p.m. and Sunday, March 6 at 2 p.m.

Thursday, Saturday and Sunday, students will perform in the CJL’s 2016 annual spring production of “12 Angry Jurors” in the Wilson Blackbox Theater. The Thursday performance is at 7:30 p.m., and the Saturday performance is at 8 p.m., followed by a matinee performance Sunday at 2 p.m. Tickets are $8 for students and $10 for non-students if purchased beforehand, and cost $10 and $12, respectively, if purchased at the door.

ART ANNUAL VISITING ARTIST LECTURE WITH PATRICK DOUGHERTY McCosh 28 Thursday, March 3 at 5:30 p.m.

This Thursday, artist Patrick Doughtery will discuss his work in McCosh 28 for the Princeton University Art Museum Student Advisory Board’s 2016 Annual Visiting Artist Lecture. Doughtery is known for his largescale outdoor sculpture work, having built over 250 grand environmental sculptures all over the United States and the world, which has led him to earn international acclaim and numerous awards.