13 10 23 1

Founded 1876 daily since 1892 online since 1998

Wednesday october 23, 2013 vol. cxxxvii no. 93

WEATHER

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } HIGH

LOW

53˚ 35˚

Cloudy and slightly windy with showers. chance of rain:

60 percent

Follow us on Twitter @princetonian

Announcement The Daily Princetonian is publishing on a Monday, Wednesday and Friday schedule during midterm week.

The next edition will be published on Friday, Oct. 25.

In Opinion Susannah Sharpless discusses feelings of newness, and Shruthi Deivasigamani reacts to Anscombe Society’s ‘What is Marriage?’ talk.

PAGE 4

Today on Campus 8 p.m.: The Princeton Student Events Committee will be hosting a massage study break. Frist Campus Center.

The Archives

Oct. 23, 1995 Dan Oberdofer ’52 and J.T. Miller ‘70 chronicle the University’s first quarter-millenium in a 272-page book.

PRINCETON By the Numbers

300

BEYOND THE BUBBLE

Bernanke’s plans after Federal Reserve unclear

MIDTERMINATORS

By Charles Min contributor

With the end of his term as chairman of the Federal Reserve slated to expire in January, former professor and chair of the economics department Ben Bernanke’s plans for life after government are still unclear.

“I prefer not to talk about my plans at this point,” Bernanke told reporters at a Sept. 18 press conference. “I hope to have more information for you at some reasonably soon date, but today I want to focus on monetary policy.”

Before his appointment to the Federal Reserve by President George W. Bush in 2006, Bernanke served as the chair of the University’s economics department from 1996 to 2002 and resigned following his appointment. He will be replaced by Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Janet Yellen, who was nominated to the position by President Barack Obama on Oct. 9.

The Federal Reserve’s Public Affairs staff said that Bernanke was not available for comment. Michelle Smith, assistant to the Federal Reserve Board and director, confirmed in an email that Bernanke has not yet publicly announced his plans for See BERNANKE page 3

LU LU :: CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHER

Students paint and enjoy each other’s company at the study break hosted by the Princeton Student Events Committee at Frist Campus Center.

LOCAL NEWS

Local same-sex couple marries

By Durva Trivedi contributor

Following Monday’s announcement that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie dropped his challenge to a state Superior Court ruling approving same-sex marriage, Princeton Mayor Liz Lempert officiated the wedding of a lesbian couple that had been waiting 30 years to be married and the University’s Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Center served wedding cake to over 60 students, faculty and staff members in celebration.

“I am glad that the governor changed his mind,” Lempert said,

adding that she feels being able to officiate weddings is the best perk of her job as mayor. While Lempert said she usually officiates the marriages of young couples, many of the same-sex ceremonies she will officiate in the coming weeks for older couples who have been together for decades are “a different kind of special.”

“It’s exciting to be a part of a change that’s such a good thing and a reason for celebration,” Lempert said. “At the same time it does feel like we’re too late — or not too late, but like it shouldn’t have taken this long.”

The town of Princeton made

SLEEP ON IT

to react as soon as there was legal clarity to be able to provide marriage licenses,” Howard said in response to the news about marriage equality in the state.

According to Lempert, support for same-sex marriage seems almost universal, especially in Princeton. The Princeton Community Democratic Organization endorsed marriage equality in 2009.

The town council unanimously approved an Oct. 14 resolution in support of same-sex marriage, encouraging lawmakers in Trenton to vote against Christie’s expected challenge to the court ruling.

See LGBT page 4

STUDENT LIFE

Projects Board mishap found to be clerical error

The approximate number of students who expressed interest in ‘Big Sibs’ when it was first presented.

News & Notes

By Anna Mazarakis staff writer

U. placed 13th in list of top national universities with most graduates entering public service

among the top 50 national universities, the University was ranked 13th in the rate of its graduates who enter public service, Washington Monthly reported.

The list was created by Aspen Institute researchers who studied the LinkedIn profiles of graduates from the top 50 national universities and the top 20 liberal arts colleges as ranked by U.S. News & World Report.

According to the data, 23.1 percent of Princeton graduates entered public service in public education, nonprofit organizations or government agencies between 2000 and 2010. It was not explained whether this referred only to the first jobs held by students immediately after graduation.

The College of William & Mary was ranked first among national universities, with 32.1 percent of graduates entering public service. It was followed by George Washington University with 31.1 percent and the University of Chicago with 30.1 percent.

Yale placed seventh on the list with 25.5 percent.

Harvard placed 12th with 23.4 percent.

application forms available in the health office immediately following the Superior Court’s Sept. 27 ruling that allowed same-sex marriages to proceed beginning Oct. 21, according to Lempert. Due to a 72hour requirement, couples had to register by last Friday to be married as early as Monday.

Heather Howard, a Princeton councilwoman, said the registrar’s office stayed open two hours later than usual to accept applications, during which two couples picked up applications and many phone inquiries were received.

“From a local perspective, it just became important for us to be ready

LU LU :: CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHER

Felix Gonzalez-Torres’ “Untitled” is displayed on a billboard on the Princeton University Art Museum lawn.

Projects Board did not violate the USG constitution in its funding request awarded to the Tango Club, Projects Board co-chair Jared Peterson ’14 and USG president Shawon Jackson ’15 confirmed Monday.

While reviewing the budget at its meeting on Sunday, the USG found that Projects Board had allegedly approved $1,800 for Tango Club’s Tango Festival. According to the USG’s constitution, any Projects Board

fund request over $1,000 must also be approved by the Senate.

The budget misrepresented the amount of money that was given to the Tango Club, leading to confusion Sunday evening.

On Monday, Peterson explained that Projects Board only granted $900 to the Tango Club. The extra $900 was credited to the Tango Club’s account because it had previously been transferred from the Tango Club account to the Projects Board account by mistake.

See USG page 2

STUDENT LIFE

‘Big Sibs’ restructured after former difficulties

By Lorenzo Quiogue contributor

Despite difficulties in organization and logistics encountered after its launch last year, the Big Sibs program, the service project of the Class of 2016, will be continued this year under a different structure with lower participation. While

roughly 300 students expressed interest in the program when it was first presented, around 120 students are currently participating.

According to Sofia Gomez ’16, this year’s Big Sibs cochair and a member of last year’s executive board, the new structure will do away with the one-on-one mentorship and instead contin-

ue as a group interaction, with groups of Princeton students writing to a class of students in the City Invincible Charter School in Camden, N.J. Gomez explained that the change was necessary after the logistical difficulties encountered under the old system. “Last year, it didn’t end up working out

because City Invincible, being a charter school, didn’t have the technological access they thought they would and they didn’t have the computers they thought they would. So it just ended up being complicated, and we were never able to actually have the email relationships,” she said.

Aside from the weekly let-

ters, Gomez explained that Princeton students would be visiting the students at City Invincible on most Saturdays so that each group of Princetonians can interact personally with their assigned class of Little Sibs. In addition, the Little Sibs will come to Princeton one Saturday to tour and explore See SERVICE page 2

ACADEMICS

Delbanco, Katz discuss troubling trends in American higher education

By Elliott Eglash contributor

Higher education has become dominated by a number of troubling trends over time, and students come to

college with little sense of why they are there, Columbia University’s American Studies program director Andrew Delbanco argued in a conversation on Tuesday afternoon.

In the course of the lecture, Delbanco and Wilson School professor Stanley Katz touched on a number of subjects about the state of education in the United States, from pre-kindergar-

ten programs to higher education.

Delbanco said that Americans increasingly see colleges as lavish institutions that fail to teach students effectively.

“They’re wasteful, they’re inefficient, they’re not doing their job, and we have a problem,” he said of ordinary people’s view of colleges.

See UNIVERSITY page 4

The Daily Princetonian

page 2

Wednesday october 23, 2013

Participation in Class of 2016 service project drops in its second year SERVICE Continued from page 1

.............

the campus.

Gomez added that the new system would also help achieve the goals of the program more easily and facilitate student involvement without demanding as much commitment.

“The reason we switched to the group dynamic was because we came to realize that people aren’t going to go every single Saturday, and so they won’t be seeing their Little Sibs consistently. And what we’re trying to really do is introduce a sense of consistency for these kids. And so with the weekly letters, there is that consistency, but without the weekly visits and personal contact, it won’t be so intense of a one-on-one relationship.”

Alex Cuadrado ’16, another member of the Big Sibs executive board, explained that, while the project is currently funded entirely by the Class of 2016 Class Council, the Council plans to cut funding in the future so that the program can achieve self-sustainability.

He went on to explain further that the board was already looking at potential other sources of funding.

The Class Council launched “Big Sibs” during the last school year, but the release was marred by many problems and delays.

“There were so many prob-

lems that we didn’t expect to happen and so many things we didn’t consider,” Mason Williams ’16, last year’s cochair of the Big Sibs program, explained. “It was so stressful for me and everyone on the board, and then with Class Council, there was so much clashing. I had to play peacemaker, and I was like, ‘You know, guys, it’s okay, Class Council can sit in on our meetings; this is their baby; they started this.’

“Some people were really only in it because it looks good on a resume.”

Mason Williams ’16

“But then you had some people who said, ‘No, we don’t want them here; this is too confusing; there are too many cooks in the kitchen,’ which there obviously were.

But they were there originally, they had the original mission and ideas and vision, and they were a great resource because they set everything up, so you don’t just get rid of them entirely.

The whole thing was just really complicated.”

Williams went on to clarify that he wasn’t personally involved with the program anymore, since the Class Council decided to reorganize the program last summer.

Justin Ziegler ’16, the president of the Class of 2016 Class Council, explained why the board was restructured.

“We realized that with 10 people on the board, it was kind of too many, so we definitely wanted to have less this year,” he said, adding that the Class Council had created a charter that clearly identified the roles of each member this year.

Williams explained that there had been a good deal of confusion in the board’s early stages over the members’ roles.

“There was so much time spent trying to figure out, ‘Okay, what is Class Council’s role now? What are people’s positions, and what are we gonna have them do? ’ ” Williams said.

Gomez said that around 120 Princeton students signed up this year, attributing the drop in participation to the fact that last year, as freshmen, the class presumably had fewer commitments. Later on, with new commitments, there was less time to focus on the project.

“Some people were really only in it because it looks good on a resume,” Williams added. “So when the level of commitment required

::::::::::::::::::::::::::: The Daily Princetonian (USPS 751-070) is published daily except Saturday and Sunday from

September through May and three times a week during January and May by The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., 48 University Place, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. Mailing address: P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542. Periodical Postage paid at Princeton Post Office, Princeton, N.J. 08542. Subscription rates: Mailed in the United States, $75.00 a year, $45.00 a term. Office hours: Monday through Friday, 1:30 to 5:30 p.m. Telephones: Area Code (609), Business: 258-8110; News and Editorial: 258-3632. Fax machine: 258-8117. Reproduction of any material in this newspaper without expressed permission of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc., is strictly prohibited. Copyright 2010, The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Daily Princetonian, P.O. Box 469, Princeton, N.J. 08542.

started to go up, they backed out.”

He added that the delay in setting up the program may have contributed to the decline.

“There was a lot of hype lost because there was so much time spent figuring out the new infrastructure and all. I think a lot of people just forgot about it, and with a project like this, you need people to be reminded and to be excited,” Williams said.

“The Big Sibs were extremely enthusiastic, and that in turn made the Little Sibs excited and enthusiastic ...”

Brianne Steakelum, City Invincible Civic Engagement Leader Despite the past year’s difficulties, both Williams and Gomez agreed that the program was well received by Princeton students and City Invincible kids alike.

“Everyone was just really happy about the project. In fact, when we were leaving City Invincible after the first Saturday, there was a girl crying because she didn’t want us to leave. They definitely loved it, and they wanted to continue,” Wil-

liams said.

Brianne Steakelum, the charter school’s Civic Engagement Leader, emphasized the program’s impact on the kids.

“The Big Sibs were extremely enthusiastic, and that in turn made the Little Sibs excited and enthusiastic to come in on Saturday, which is huge. They got really excited to learn their Big Sibs’ names and write letters to them and things like that,” Steakelum said, explaining that the Big Sibs had planted a community garden and done some artsand-crafts activities with the Little Sibs.

She added that she really admired the commitment Princeton students have shown.

“Everyone was just really happy about the project.”

Mason Williams ’16

“I am completely overwhelmed and humbled by the number of students who would dedicate their time to the Little Sibs. I couldn’t believe how many college kids would take time out of a Saturday to

hang out with kids from our school,” she said.

“We want to really help these kids and turn college from a dream into something that is expected ...”

Justin Ziegler ’16

Ziegler ex plained that this year’s program would include new skil ls-based learning initiatives in areas such as reading and math.

“We want to really help these kids and turn college from a dream into something that is expected, and we know that making this kind of impact at a young age is really important,” Ziegler said.

He added that the board members are discussing the sustainability of the project, including what will happen after the Class of 2016 graduates.

“Nothing is set yet, but we’ve definitely been talking about a lot of things. It’s extremely important that once you enter into someone’s life, you stay there, and we’re trying to figure out ways to do that. I think that’s vital,” he said.

Constitution upheld by Projects Board USG

Continued from page 1

.............

“All of the money netted out to be the proper funding amount, but there’s a line item that shows the $1,800 from us to them, which is why the Senate thought we had funded the group more than $1,000,” Peterson said.

Both Peterson and Jackson stressed that the reported $1,800 funding request was solely a clerical error.

Since this was not the first time that Projects Board allegedly neglected to seek Senate approval before granting funds in excess of $1,000, various members of the Senate wanted to vote to censure Projects Board’s budget at the meeting on Sunday night.

“If this was the same issue arising, I would agree with them, but this was not a funding of over $1,000 that we didn’t get their approval on,” Peterson said. “I think they should have checked to make sure it actually was a violation of the constitution before they considered issuing a censure.”

U-Councilor Paul Riley ’15 said at the meeting that the USG should talk to Projects Board before making any assumptions about the ap-

proval of this fund request, a suggestion that Jackson said he agreed with.

“That’s especially true knowing the outcome of this situation, as we saw that it was actually an error in the system and not any fault of the committee itself,” Jackson said.

Riley is also a member of Projects Board.

“I think they should have checked to make sure it actually was a violation ...”

Jared Peterson ’14 Projects Board Co-Chair Though the vote to censure Projects Board failed, the USG did vote to invite Peterson to its next meeting on Nov. 10 so he could explain Projects Board’s actions.

Since Projects Board did not actually violate the USG’s constitution, Jackson said the Senate will vote via email over fall break in order to decide whether the Projects Board co-chairs will still need to attend the next Senate meeting.

“I would say, in the future, for clarity in USG proceedings,” Peterson said, “I would prefer if Projects Board was let know if our finances were under scrutiny and were going to be discussed and possibly issued an official censure by the Senate so that either Eileen [Lee ’14, Projects Board co-chair] or I could be there to help explain it or we can at least be involved in the dialogue.”

CORRECTION Due to editing errors, an earlier version of the Oct. 21 article ‘Projects Board request allegedly violates USG Constitution’ misspelled the surname of Andy Loo ‘16 and misstated U-Council Chair Elan Kugelmass’s title.

Due to a production error, the Oct.18 column “Class Divisions” contained one paragraph of text that did not belong.

Due to a production error, the caption for the Oct. 22 photograph of National Chocolate Cupcake Day misstated the name of the organization hosting the event. It was hosted by the the International Student Association of Princeton.

The ‘Prince’ regrets the errors.

The Daily Princetonian

Wednesday october 23, 2013

page 3

Blinder doubts Bernanke’s return to U. BERNANKE Continued from page 1

.............

the future.

Economics professor Alan Blinder, who served as Federal Reserve vice chairman from 1994 to 1996, told The Daily Princetonian in February after Bernanke was announced as Baccalaureate speaker that the University could not rule out the possibility that Bernanke would return as a professor after his term ended.

However, Blinder said in a recent interview that he thought it is “unlikely” that Bernanke would return immediately to the University following his chairmanship.

“I don’t know,” Blinder said of Bernanke’s plans.

“And probably he doesn’t yet [either] because he’s still a Federal Reserve chairman, so he has until January. But I’d be surprised at this stage if he comes back here.”

He added that Bernanke might remain in Washington because he has many professional connections there.

Even so, Blinder noted Bernanke’s decision to deliver a series of lectures on the 2007 economic recession at the George Washington University School of Business in March 2012, and he said that one could not discount the possibility that the Chairman might return to academia at some point in the mid- or long-term.

Blinder added that he thought Bernanke might miss teaching students.

Blinder said that having Bernanke back at the University would be a pleasant surprise for everyone. “Getting somebody like Ben Bernanke after his incredible experiences in Washington back here would be fantastic, I think, from our point of view — also from the faculty point of view, and especially from the student’s point of view.”

Bernanke still has the option of serving as a Federal Reserve Board member until 2020, a plan that Blinder considers “beyond stunning if he did.”

Several faculty in the economics department either did not respond to comment or said they did not have information about Bernanke’s plans.

Did you know... that the ‘Prince’ has a Facebook page?

Like our page!

ROGER WANG :: FILE PHOTO

Ben Bernanke, former professor and chairman of the economics department, stands in Richardson Auditorium.

Procrastinate productively!

Done reading your ‘Prince’?

Recycle!

The Daily Princetonian

page 4

Wednesday october 23, 2013

Delbanco criticizes rankings obsession

THE GREAT ESCAPE

UNIVERSITY Continued from page 1

.............

This attitude is reinforced by rising tuition fees, which are caused in turn by the increasing privatization of higher education, Delbanco explained.

“Our public universities have been gutted,” he said, noting that public funds make up only 6 percent of the University of Virginia’s budget.

Katz warned against public universities’ efforts to raise funds in the face of budget shortfalls, either through tuition increases or the admission of more out-of-state students. These strategies undercut the democratic purpose of public education in America, he said.

Higher education has developed a “pernicious and

perverse obsession with rankings,” Delbanco said.

This trend extends from universities such as Princeton, “which is always jockeying with Harvard and Yale,” to other universities that “are really working hard to get up into the top 200.”

More troublesome, he said, is universities’ focus on SAT scores.

“As far as I know, the one clear correlation between SAT scores and anything else is correlation with family income,” said Delbanco.

“If you’re driving your institution to matriculate a class that has very high SAT scores, you’re basically driving it to admit and enroll mainly rich kids.”

Katz also discussed the changing purpose of a university education in America today, arguing that institutions measure

their success by how many students they can award degrees. He added that universities are no longer focusing as much on educating students as they once did, concentrating instead on “preparing them to compete with the Chinese.”

Despite all these pressures, Katz said that universities still consider their primary business to be the promotion of student learning. He explained that the purpose of a university education is still to teach students about the world, not simply to prepare them for the job market.

Delbanco said that college is still a worthwhile investment, at least for now. He added that “most people who take the public position that not everybody should go to college are thinking about somebody else’s children.”

U. LGBT Center celebrates deciLGBT

Continued from page 1

.............

AUSTIN LEE :: STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

Angus Deaton, Wilson school professor, discusses his new book in Dodds Auditorium on Monday afternoon.

Howard, who proposed the resolution, said she feels that while same-sex in the state is good progress, the development happened too slowly from the perspective of Princeton residents.

“We’re a progressive community, and we wanted to implement this as quickly as possible because these couples have been denied equal treatment for too long,” she said.

Princeton was in fact the first municipality in Mercer County to accept applications on Friday and

perform weddings on Monday, making this “a proud moment” for Princeton, Howard said.

The news was received with celebration from the campus LGBT community as well. Debbie Bazarsky, the director of the LGBT Center on campus, has been updating the community with the latest developments over the last week via email.

While the LGBT Center has not been involved with advocacy for particular legislation, Bazarsky explained that its role is to be “a conduit of information” about developments in LGBT rights issues.

In an email sent last Friday, Ba-

zarsky notified colleagues, alumni and students of the Friday deadline to file for marriage in order to be married Monday. On Monday, Bazarsky sent another email announcing Christie’s decision to drop his appeal of the court’s decision.

Bazarsky’s email invited recipients to join the LGBT Center in celebrating the fact that as married couples, people in same-sex unions will now be able to share the over 1,100 federal rights that were previously limited to heterosexual couples in New Jersey.

According to Howard, the state decision brings “a lot of good news from a civil rights perspective.”

News & Notes Don’t be mad.

Don’t be sad.

Be glad, and BUY AN AD!

Christie drops challenge to court ruling, effectively legalizing same-sex marriage in New Jersey governor chris christie announced Monday morning that he will drop his challenge to a state Supreme Court decision permitting same-sex marriage, effectively making New Jersey the 14th state in the nation to legalize

same-sex marriage.

Christie noted that he disagreed with the decision made by the Court but acknowledged that it “left no ambiguity,” The New York Times reported. Christie had sought a stay to prevent the marriages from taking place, but his petition was denied and his administration has announced it will not continue to challenge the

ruling.

The ruling went into effect just after midnight on Monday, when same-sex couples across the state held weddings at promptly 12:01 a.m., The New York Times reported. In the town of Princeton, Mayor Liz Lempert announced on her Facebook page that she would be authorized to officiate same-sex marriages starting Monday.

DONUT TRY TO STOP ME

For more information, contact ‘Prince’ business.

Call (609)258-8110 or

MONICA CHON :: PHOTOGRAPHY EDITOR

Students enjoyed cider donuts from Terhune Orchards at the Class of 2015 study break on Tuesday evening.

The Daily Princetonian

Wednesday october 23, 2013

page 5

Q&A: Christine Pelosi on political family and income inequality

By Ruby Shao contributor

After delivering a lecture called “Campaign Bootcamp: Leadership Lessons from Candidates on the Trail and Women on the Run” Friday night, author and activist Christine Pelosi — daughter of former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi — spoke to The Daily Princetonian about her childhood growing up in a political family, the goals driving her work and a new book coming out next year.

The Daily Princetonian: What first made you interested in grassroots politics?

Christine Pelosi: I started being interested in grassroots politics when I was walking in precincts as a young child, and I’ve been doing it ever since.

DP: What were you like in college?

CP: Well, I was very active in a student cooperative called Vital Vittles at Georgetown.

My third year of college, I went [home] junior year to work on my mom’s special election … to Congress. So, when I say what was I like in college: I was pretty outgoing, studious, had a lot

of fun with my friends and then had this very, very intense experience where I spent the second half of my junior year at home, working full-time on a campaign, then came back and made up the classes in the summer and fall. So I’d say I was probably a lot more serious when I got back than I was before I left.

DP: Where would you be without your mom’s influence?

CP: Well, without my mom, I wouldn’t be here. But I think that I would be a lot less confident walking into a room of complete strangers and trying to make friends and make my point.

I would also be less familiar with the skills of balancing being a mom and being a working professional at the same time if I hadn’t seen my mom organize to raise the five of us, and then when we were older, balance doing her community work with taking care of the five of us.

DP: What is the most valuable way of balancing that split that she showed you?

CP: Be who you are, where you are … If you’re on the

phone, be on the phone.

With your child, be with your child. If it’s homework time, it’s homework time. If it’s dinner, it’s dinner. Believe it or not, we didn’t really discuss politics at the dinner table. We still don’t, because Father doesn’t really like politics that much, and we’d rather talk about other things at the table. We talked about politics separately. We talked about civics or sports or other people or what’s going on in our lives, but as my mom says, “Put it on the shelf.” You have to do your work and be intense about it, but then you have to put that on the shelf, and have a regular life, so that you don’t miss out on trying to be a good friend, being a good parent, a good spouse, a good relative, a good citizen outside of being a political activist. There are a lot of people I know who completely overdose on politics, and it is very unpleasant for their families because they never turn it off. And my mom is always a mom, even when she comes to my boot camps, and acts like my mom, when I wish she would just act like [laughs] the leader of the House, and not the leader of my house.

Take it like a polaroid picture.

Join the ‘Prince’ photo department. join@dailyprincetonian.com

Did you know?

Our talented photographers take hundreds of high-quality images at the events that matter to you.

Check them out and purchase copies at photo.dailyprincetonian.com

DP: How has your professional experience as a prosecutor, special counsel, chief of staff, party leader and blogger helped you form the philosophy behind your boot camps and books?

CP: Well, one thing that has been a through-line through all of that is my quest for justice for women and children and also my appreciation of the value that having a voice at the national microphone means. So I have a great opportunity to meet a broad variety of people and to hear their stories and to get to tell their stories on social media and in my boot camps. And I think that that diversity of experience and that ability to share that with other people is a philosophy that I try to bring to campaigns, so that people who are involved in politics don’t feel that they have to have been there forever in order to succeed or that if they just recite a set of talking points, then that makes them a politician, ’cause it doesn’t. It makes them somebody who can memorize talking points.

DP: What do you hope will be distinctive about your next book, “Women on the

Run”?

CP: Humor and empathy.

Humor, because I think there’s a lot of funny stories that I’ve been told — things that have happened to people as they’re running, and sometimes injecting humor into politics helps a lesson go down a little more smoothly.

And empathy because there are women who are really trying to make a contribution to civics, to make a contribution to society, and without the support of other women, or of feminists, they are not going to be able to succeed. So I want my book to teach people that it’s fun to be a woman out there on the run but also that there’s an important job that needs to get done, and women have to be a part of doing that job. If we’re going to have a legitimate society, women have to be in leadership positions across all sectors of our society.

DP: What do you see as the biggest issue facing America today, and how would you solve it?

CP: I think the biggest issue facing America today is income inequality, and I would solve it by more investments in education and in the kind

of education that helps people get jobs. So that would begin, of course, in grammar school classrooms, with kids who come out of either Head Start or universal preK, ready to learn and feeling valued, but also that people are taught practical skills that can help them get jobs and rebuild the country and think and dream in imaginative ways. I think … even if you had all the money in the world, if all you did was send everybody to college, it wouldn’t necessarily mean that everybody would get a fulfilling job and that everybody would be able to live up to their fullest potential. But you have to start somewhere.

And giving people the educational tools they need to be able to shift our country from a manufacturing country, industrial-based into a knowledge-based economy wherever we can, and reinvigorating the manufacturing that we need in our infrastructure is the only way you’re really going to start to equalize that. So I think that the overall income equality is the biggest problem.

I would solve it with more education, I would solve it with more investment in jobs and I would solve it with comprehensive immigration reform.

(if(equal? web love) (join the ‘Prince’ now) (join anyway))

Join the ‘Prince’ web and multimedia team.

Email join@dailyprincetonian.com

Morgan Jerkins columnist

S

Morgan Jerkins is a comparative literature major from Williamstown, N.J. She can be reached at mjerkins@princeton.edu.

page 6

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com }

Getting help with fitting in

Finance or bust ever al times a week, my inbox is f looded with emails from TigerTracks about new opportunities in consulting, trading and investment banking. At first I thought that maybe I had made a mistake when I filled out my profile. Did I accidentally click “computer science” instead of “comparative literature” when I clicked on the drop-down box to list my major? Perhaps I clicked on one of the check-boxes for “consulting” when I really meant to click “communications/media” as one of my career preferences. But when I looked at my profile, I had made no errors. So why was I receiving emails that did not pertain to my interests? After expressing my opinions to friends, I realized that I wasn’t the only one who felt a little bit peeved about these emails. According to PolicyMic, in 2011 about 35 percent of Princeton students went into finance, which proves that the industry is booming. The top investment banking companies come to Princeton and Harvard first to recruit students, and these emails are used to spread the word in order to prepare for the early recruitment and interviewing process. And I’m not suggesting that no one in the humanities goes into these types of job sectors.

They do. But when I rarely see email alerts about arts companies, I cannot help but wonder if I, and many others who made sure to detail their preferences on TigerTracks, are being ignored.

As mentioned earlier, I understand that the recruitment process for finance companies starts very early in the year.

Students dress in their best professional attire and head to Frist 302 to hear from employers, chat with them afterward and eat good food. Career Services tries to create a balance with these events; for example, they organize the annual Communications Careers & Networking Night. Looking at the description for the event, it is noted that these types of companies do not often recruit on campus. But why not? Those handling TigerTracks should count the students whose interests include the arts, editorials, writing, et cetera, so that they can use these statistics to attract companies from these particular job sectors to come to campus in order to recruit people. If Career Services targets students who participate in the Nassau Literary Review, the Nassau Weekly, The Daily Princetonian, creative writing classes and the countless theater groups, I can almost guarantee that you will find enough students to fill Dillon Gymnasium for a career fair that is specifically aimed at those who are interested in the arts.

This will encourage companies from these sectors to network more with students. The demand is already there.

The Freelance Artist’s Manifesto Boot Camp is another excellent example of an initiative hosted by Theatre Intime for those who are artistically inclined. But what about those artists who do not want to be freelance? There are countless ways in which an artistic person can channel his or her skills, both in traditional and unconventional paths. For instance, NYU’s Tisch School of the Arts or the University of Iowa’s Writers’ Workshop could hold information sessions here. These options do exist, but we need access to them.

I have noticed that there are a few companies, such as those in translation, with deadlines that passed a few short days ago. What if reminders were sent about those opportunities? Since foreign language study is required for two years at Princeton and there are plenty of students who go beyond the requirement, these types of students should be catered to as well. Do you know how many Princetonians speak French?

Searching for jobs is a stressful topic for all seniors, but the process would be less overwhelming with balanced support from Career Services. Yes, finance students should be especially cognizant of deadlines and information sessions because the recruitment processes are early and tend to finish rather quickly.

That doesn’t mean that the entire student community should be f looded with these emails, especially when we have never listed these career preferences. Instead, those who tend to fall on the artistic side should be informed and reminded about upcoming deadlines for other companies.

Check out BuzzFeed (which was started by a Princeton alumnus, might I add) — there is a job opening this instant as a books editor. Many Princeton students on Facebook are constantly tuned into these websites. If Career Services could consolidate some of this information and send emails, perhaps others like me wouldn’t feel so left out.

Opinion

Wednesday october 23, 2013

Susannah Sharpless columnist

W

hen you join an eating club (if you join an eating club), a weird thing happens: You become the baby again.

Though you’re basically halfway though your undergraduate career — if you keep churning smoothly through the system like the rule-abider you are — and a legal adult, you suddenly find yourself infantilized. The older members beam at you and tell you how to bus your plate. When you show up for meals alone, you feel intimidated, awkward. You wander wide-eyed through unfamiliar halls, feeling once more that overwhelming newness you haven’t felt since freshman fall.

Aaron Applbaum ’14 recently wrote about his wish for more cohesion among the student body, and I agree with him, but I would like to emphasize a different negative effect of the eating-clubinduced bifurcation between upper- and underclassmen.

He is right to worry about lost opportunities for friendship and growth. I think, also, that this separation between younger and older students robs us of a chance to help each other.

I think we all remember how scary Princeton can be when you don’t know what on earth is going on. This is a school of strange lingo and unspoken rules. From “proxes” to passes, to the twin McCoshes, to what it means to be “picked up” or “hosed,” feeling comfortable here is as much about speaking the language as it is about figuring out where you “fit.” The other day, a friend

of mine fumed about the way a freshman had asked her for a pass. She and I, as freshmen, had been terrified into simpering timidity by socially powerful upperclassmen because we were susceptible to social pressure and easily swayed by group cohesion.

Admittedly, this freshman had been relatively rude, but how could he possibly have known better?

My understanding of how to fit into this campus was formed both because and in spite of the sorority I belonged to for a yearand-a-half. I joined as a freshman because I was totally confused

by Princeton and rushing was the easiest way to work my way into a campus social scene I barely even knew existed, let alone understood. The girls I met during rush were friendly, tall and blonde, a lot of them were English majors, and I thought I saw some incarnation of what I’d like to be in them. It was shallow, but I was sold. Though I eventually turned out not to be an English major and definitely not to be a sorority girl, I never could have evolved past who I was then, and what I understood Princeton to be, had I not had this community in the first place.

Given the circumstances, it was the best I could do.

I’m pretty against Greek life in general these days, but I can’t fault anyone for wishing for this kind of network to decipher the complexities of the first months and years here. It’s true that there are a variety of ways for underclassmen to find this kind of guidance within the older echelons of this campus community, but these are highly specific, often aimed at a certain demographic and mainly

academic. I don’t know if they work or not. I know the peer adviser I had freshman year (was I supposed to have one sophomore year, too?) was unhelpful — and besides, I knew what I wanted to study. What I needed were upperclassman connections I could ask for more than just a pass.

I don’t have an exact solution.

I do know that efforts last spring to make me feel at home in my eating club worked: I love it there now. This fall, watching freshmen — my younger sister among them — adjust to this campus makes me wonder whether us upperclassmen could do something like this, though I’m not exactly sure what it would be, for the actual new kids on the block, the real babies. Last month, as my newsfeed filled with pictures of newly Greek sophomores hugging smiling juniors, all in their letters, I felt something like envy underneath my scorn. I wanted that: to get to know the people the dining halls I’m never in and tell them that if they mix Sriracha with Fines Herbes Dressing it’s actually delicious. I’d like to let the underclassmen cramming in my old study room in on the secret that the walls are thinner than they realize, so they shouldn’t sing along to their 2 a.m. pump-up song, and to remind whomever’s in my old room in Yoseloff that everyone can see what they’re up to from the courtyard. Well, everyone who’s down there, at least. Which isn’t me, anymore.

Susannah Sharpless is a religion major from Indianapolis, Ind. She can be reached at ssharple@ princeton.edu.

past follies

vol. cxxxvii

Luc Cohen ’14

editor-in-chief

Grace Riccardi ’14

business manager

managing editor Emily Tseng ’14 news editors Patience Haggin ’14 Anastasya Lloyd-Damnjanovic ’14 opinion editor Sarah Schwartz ’15 sports editor Stephen Wood ’15 street editor Abigail Williams ’14 photography editors Monica Chon ’15 Merrill Fabry ’14 copy editors Andrea Beale ’14 Erica Sollazzo ’14 design editor Helen Yao ’15 web editors Sarah Cen ’16 Adrian De Smul ’14 multimedia editor Christine Wang ’14 prox editor Daniel Santoro ’14 intersections editor Amy Garland ’14 associate news editor Catherine Ku ’14 associate news editor for enterprise Marcelo Rochabrun ’15 associate opinion editors Richard Daker ’15 Tehila Wenger ’15 associate sports editors Damir Golac ’15 Victoria Majchrzak ’15 associate street editors Urvija Banerji ’15 Catherine Bauman ’15 associate photography editors Conor Dube ’15 Lilia Xie ’14

rita fang ’17

..................................................

associate copy editors Dana Bernstein ’15 Jennifer Cho ’15 associate design editor Allison Metts ’15 associate multimedia editor Rishi Kaneriya ’16 editorial board chair Ethan Jamnik ’15

NIGHT STAFF 10.22.13 news Night Chief Jean-Carlos Arenas ’16 Charles Min ’17 copy Rebekah Shoemake ’17 Alexander Schindele-Murayama ’16 Chamsi Hssaine ’16 Lily Lesser ’17 design Gerardo Lerena ’16 Jean-Carlos Arenas ’16

A response to “What is Marriage?”

Shruthi Deivasigamani columnist

L

ast Thursday evening, I found myself in McCosh 50 for Ryan Anderson’s talk, “What Is Marriage?” The fact that it was sponsored by the Anscombe Society — a campus group dedicated to promoting traditional marriage roles, family and chastity — gave me a pretty strong inking of what wouldn’t be included in his definition.

The gay marriage debate is ages old at this point. On a college campus, it’s pretty difficult to oppose samesex marriage in peace. Especially in such a liberal part of the United States, being homophobic like that is just about equivalent to being racist.

What interested me in Anderson’s talk, however, was that he claimed he would make a case for the “traditional definition” of marriage without calling upon religion reasoning, vague moral loftiness or historical precedent. He said he’d use purely “philosophical reasoning.”

It turns out that “philosophical reasoning” was just a generic slippery slope argument. If we change one variable in the supposedly very complicated definition of marriage (his, by the way, consisted of three parts: a man and a woman creating a nurturing environment for children,

doing this with sexual exclusivity and doing this forever), it could lead to changing every variable. What’s to stop it from changing two people of any sex to three people of any sex?

What’s to stop it from becoming four people of any sex? What’s to stop marriage from being a temporary “wed-lease” — no expectation of forever at all?

The main problem with the slippery slope argument is that marriage law has already changed tons of times, within the last hundred years alone. Fifty years ago, marriage law disallowed interracial unions. Even before that, it dictated that a woman, after marriage, would become the husband’s property.

Clearly, we’ve appended the law several times already, and anarchy has not yet broken loose.Someone in the audience did mention interracial marriage in the Q&A session, and Anderson responded by saying that the old writings of Aristotle and Plato never indicated that marriage had to be between two people of the same race, so therefore it was okay. I found this response startling for several reasons. First of all, it broke the rule that Anderson set for himself that he wouldn’t call upon historical precedent. Second, if Aristotle and Plato had indeed had racist tendencies in their writings from thousands of years ago, would that make a solid case

against interracial marriage now?

Furthermore, what even makes them any sort of authority on the matter of marriage? Plato wasn’t even married, and Aristotle said in “Politics” that women were “subject to men, but higher than slaves.”

Anderson pointed to polyamory as the seemingly catch-all bleak dystopia that the world would be headed to once we legalize samesex marriage. Many defenders of traditional marriage law seem to think this too. What’s surprising, though, is that even people who believe in marriage equality seem to agree that polygamy would be an unwanted consequence. The thing is, I don’t think polygamy and polyamory are huge deals either. It’s no one else’s business, certainly not the government’s, what a certain person’s definition of love is. What does matter is that the institution is offered to all members of society equally. The main argument against polygamy by skeptics is that it never works out, many citing Psychology Today’s claim that people are just fundamentally too jealous. However, with 50 percent of all weddings ending in divorce, it’s arguable that marriage in general just doesn’t work out. No one’s proposing to illegalize marriage because it doesn’t seem to work out. According to a recent study done based on U.S. Census data, bartenders have one of the highest

divorce rates among all professions, yet no one’s trying to make sure that they never get married.

Apart from his slippery slope argument, Anderson made the claim that marriages are all about children and that single-parent households and same-sex marriages produce the “worst environment” for children.

He cited a few social science studies to back this up but was very unclear on what “worst environment” even means. Furthermore, as he conceded himself later in the Q&A session, social science studies are very difficult to control. Two studies about the same subjects can reach polaropposite conclusions based only on the type of data they report. And if both single-parent households and same-sex households scored equally “bad” in terms of rearing children, what’s the legal justification for allowing one but banning the other?

I came to Anderson’s talk expecting a well-articulated argument with which I would have to respectfully disagree. I was a little sad that what I heard was a rather shoddy one. Slippery-slope arguments and poorly controlled social science experiments aren’t a proper platform on which to deny one-tenth of the American population equal rights.

Shruthi Deivasigamani is a sophomore from Cresskill, N.J. She can be reached at shruthid@princeton.edu.

The Daily Princetonian

Wednesday october 23, 2013

page 7

Cappon and Carril careers are parallel tales Sophomore hurdler keeps good perspective COLUMN ON TAP

Continued from page 8

.............

A: I hated running! Like, I quit tennis because I hated running, and then I ended up being a college runner.

Q: How did that transition happen?

A: I don’t know. Once I got into it, it’s a really beautiful sport. It’s just one of the best sports you could do.

Q: What do you think about when you run?

A: Well, besides it killing — my favorite thing to do is go for runs and not focus on the time or the pace and just kind of get lost in thought. It’s usually just a reflective time, and it’s very nice to be in touch with your thoughts and yourself and be introspective.

Q: What’s your least favorite thing about running?

A: I’m not sure if it’s my least favorite thing, but I find that it’s difficult because you can get really caught up in numbers. You can see progression — or lack thereof — by half a second or less, depending on the length of your race, and it definitely can drive you crazy if you don’t have a good perspective over it. It’s just really hard to keep perspective because there’s nothing subjective about the sport; it’s very honest.

Q: If you could do one other sport, what would it be?

A: I think volleyball. After going to a few volleyball games here, I think it’s the coolest sport. It’s so team-oriented and so much fun.

Q: Who’s the quirkiest member of your team?

A: It’s either going to be Julia Ratcliffe — she’s a thrower from New Zealand; she’s awesome — or Rachael Chacko. Shoutout to Chacko; I love her. She’s one peppy ball of enthusiasm.

Q: What do you like better: track and field or cross country?

A: Track and field, for sure. If I had slow-twitch muscles for cross country and my body didn’t hate it, I would probably like cross country better. But just because my

Continued from page 8

body likes track better, I like track better.

Q: What do you want to major in?

A: I’m thinking about majoring in psychology with a certificate in neuroscience. I really like neuroscience a lot. I feel like I found something I really love, which I didn’t think I’d really find. Even today in lecture, Professor Graziano pulled out a puppet and was being a ventriloquist. I love that lecture every week.

Q: If you were stranded on an island and could only bring three things, what would they be?

A: I’d probably bring [sophomore teammate] Sarah Porter [and] apples. I could probably live off of them.

Q: What kind is your favorite?

A: Pink Lady. It’s really sweet; it’s like candy. The third thing I would bring is a camera and a dark room to develop in. I like photography a lot.

Q: What do you like to do when you’re not running?

A: I like to paint a lot and sketch. I haven’t been able to do it as much as I like to since I’ve been here though, but it’s like my go-to outlet.

Q: Have you ever tripped on your own feet and fallen in a race?

A: I have not done that. I’m waiting for the day when I trip over a hurdle and fall on my face. I’ve yet to do that in a race. I’ve only done it once or twice in practice in the last six or seven years. I’m waiting for it to happen.

Q: Were you scared the first time that you were running toward this stationary object?

A: I still get scared. It’s scary because you’re running pretty much full speed at something that’s not going to move for you, so, if you don’t think about it, it’s much easier. But you kind of have to because you have to focus on your form and your steps and how far away you are. I still get scared. In practice especially, I run off to the side a bunch, which is a bad habit, but during a race it’s just a different mentality, and I just have to go through with it.

Personality Survey: 1) During lecture you are... a) asking the professor questions. b) doodling all over your notes. c) correcting grammar mistakes. d) watching videos on youtube.com e) calculating the opportunity cost of sitting in lecture.

2) Your favorite hidden pasttime is... a) getting the scoop on your roommate’s relationships. b) stalking people’s Facebook pictures. c) finding dangling modifiers in your readings. d) managing your blog. e) lurking outside 48 University Place.

3) The first thing that you noticed was... a) the word “survey.” b) the logo set in the background. c) the extra “t” in “pasttime.” d) the o’s and i’s that look like binary code from far away. e) the fact that this is a super-cool ad for The Daily Princetonian.

If you answered mostly “a,” you are a reporter in the making!

If you answered mostly “b,” you are a design connoisseur, with unlimited photography talents!

If you answered mostly “c,” you are anal enough to be a copy editor!

If you answered mostly “d,” you are a multimedia and web designing whiz!

And if you answered mostly “e,” you are obsessed with the ‘Prince’ and should come join the Editorial Board and Business staff!

Contact join@dailyprincetonian.com!

.............

Cappon — almost always referred to as “Cappy” — was a star in both basketball and football at the University of Michigan. After coaching stints at the University of Kansas and University of Michigan, Cappon found his final and longest coaching stop at Princeton in 1938. During his tenure as coach, according to former player Selden Edwards ’63, “[Cappon] was Princeton basketball to anyone vaguely familiar with the teams of that era … His personality had come to dominate East Coast basketball. Though his six conference championships in his last 12 years of coaching speak for themselves, more striking to me was the game plan he

employed.”

Cappon’s success was primarily built on two cornerstones: his “Iron Five” and the five-man weave. Cappon was never one to draw from his bench. He believed that his starting five ought to be wellconditioned enough to last throughout the game without missing a beat. Whether out of conviction or necessity (Princeton’s roster rarely lends itself to a Miami Heat-style offense), Cappon forged from his shallow talent pool a perennial league powerhouse.

His second main weapon, which he had used since his first days at Princeton, was the five-man weave. In the weave, a player dribbles with his outside hand and passes to an approaching teammate, with whom he basically swaps places on the court. Cappon’s style of

offense syncs totally with his emphasis on excellent conditioning, for it’s impossible to execute a weave throughout the game if the players wear

“[Cappon] was Princeton basketball to anyone vaguely familiar with the teams of that era.”

Selden Edwards ’63

out after the first quarter. Of course, the idea is that the opposing team will get exhausted.

In efforts to conserve energy, defenders found themselves either giving up mismatches, dropping too far back to defend the basket (and thus allowing easy midrange jumpers) or just allowing simple layups.

By these two core principles, Cappon was able to maximize the potential of his players and elevate Princeton basketball to the next level. The tales of Cappon and Carril, when placed together, certainly look like parallel tales. I look at the styles of these two men not to suggest that Carril got all his tricks by looking at what Cappon had done. Nothing I can write here could ever detract from the career of a coach who belongs in the Hall of Fame. I merely wish to point out that for most success stories, like Carril’s, there are successful blueprints lying behind them.

Sports

Wednesday october 23, 2013

page 8

{ www.dailyprincetonian.com } {

On Tap

}

{ Column }

On Tap with ...

Meghan McMullin

The blueprints of the Princeton offense Miles Hinson Contributor

By Victoria Majchrzak Associated Sports Editor

Sophomore Meghan McMullin runs on the crosscountry team and hurdles for the track-and-field squad. Recently, she sat down with the ‘Prince’ to talk about Snooki, Pink Lady apples and tripping over hurdles.

Q: Where are you from, and what is it like there?

A: I’m from the Jersey Shore, about an hour away from campus. Most of the shore is nothing like the show [“The Jersey Shore”]. It’s actually much more classy and not as trashy.

Q: Do people ever ask you if you know Snooki?

A: All the time — every time I mention that I’m from the Jersey Shore, that’s like the first question. I do live really close to her.

Q: When did you start running?

A: I started running in seventh and eighth grade, but I would do everything I could possibly could to not run at practice. I would hide behind bushes and cut corners and cut my warm-up in half. So I would say I probably started legitimately running freshman year [of high school].

Q: What was your reasoning?

LILIA XIE :: ASSOCIATE PHOTOGRAPHY EDITOR

Sophomore Meghan McMullin is on the cross-country and track-and-field teams.

See ON TAP page 7

Feb. 11, 1983: Pete Carril secures his 273rd victory as Princeton’s head basketball coach, becoming the Tigers’ all-time leader in wins. Carril, whose name is now synonymous with Princeton basketball, currently holds the highest winning percentage of any Ivy League head coach ever (.658). Much of his success was due to his capacity to develop less-than-stellar players within his system, as well as his stalwart defensive scheme, which allowed the fewest points of any team in the nation for eight years in a row.

Though he was a master of all aspects of the game, Carril’s legacy will forever be tied to the Princeton offense. For the unfamiliar, the Princeton offense is, at heart, a game of constant motion, where players never hold the ball for more than a short period of time. The constant passing and movement of the players leads, in theory, to one of three outcomes: an exploitable mismatch of position (big on little guy, for example), an open midrange jumper or, should a defender lose track of his man, a simple backdoor cut leading to an easy layup.

In a school generally lacking in NBA-caliber talent, such a system is ideal. Instead of relying on one dominant superstar, a coach utilizes the talents of five high-quality players and keeps a defense off-balance. As Georgetown coach (and former Princeton coach) John Thompson III once noted, “When I say the Princeton offense, you know, I just think of guys playing together, sharing the ball.

Talented, unselfish players.”

Certainly, Carril was a genius. How else could a coach working with such a pool of talent defeat a No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament, as Princeton did against UCLA in 1996? He was a great coach, but it should be understood that the Princeton offense Carril set up already had roots here on campus. Another man, Franklin Cappon, had already set the groundwork for the program’s future success.

See COLUMN page 7

THE

AROUND I V I E S As November approaches, contenders have begun to separate from the rest of the Ivy League. With four teams in the thick of it and the others still holding onto hope, here’s how the league breaks down: Penn (5-6-1 overall, 2-0-1 Ivy League): The Quakers have the most goals of any team in the Ancient Eight and boast wins over Cornell and Dartmouth, the latter of which they defeated 3-0. Penn’s defense has not yet allowed a goal during Ivy play and has earned five shutouts this season. Junior midfielder/forward Duke Lacroix is second in the Ivy League both in points and in goals.

1.

Princeton (5-6-1, 2-0-1): Led by sophomore forward Thomas Sanner, whose seven goals are the most in the league, the Tigers are very much alive in the hunt for the championship. The Tigers broke a two-game scoreless streak with a 2-1 win over Columbia last weekend on the strength of sophomore midfielder Brendan McSherry’s first career goal. Next weekend, Princeton heads to Harvard for a tough game that will have major implications for the Ivy title.

2.

Yale (3-8-1, 2-0-1): Their overall record isn’t too impressive, but the Bulldogs are tied for a share of the lead in the Ivy League. Yale snapped a five-game losing streak with a win over Harvard and followed it up with a 1-0 double-overtime victory over Dartmouth. The Bulldogs’ offense has put up more than two points only once this season, but the defense has allowed only one goal to an Ivy League opponent so far.

3.

Harvard (3-7-2, 2-1): A 2-1 loss to rival Yale started Harvard’s Ivy campaign off on a bad note, but since then the Crimson has rallied to beat Cornell in two overtimes in Ithaca and took down Brown in Cambridge. Though he only has one goal, defender Ross Friedman may be the Crimson’s biggest offensive threat — his six assists are the most of anyone in the league. After a loss to Boston College on Tuesday night, the Crimson will set its sights on its matchup with Princeton next Saturday.

4.

Columbia (5-4-2, 0-1-2): The Lions score the second-most goals per game of any team in the league and have a winning record to show for it. They do not, however, have a league win. A five-game winning streak was snapped by consecutive ties with Brown and Penn, and since then they have lost to UConn and Princeton. David Najem, third in the league in both goals and assists, leads the high-powered offense.

5.

Brown (3-6-3, 0-1-2): After tying with Columbia and Princeton, Brown lost 2-1 to Harvard on Saturday. The Bears will have a decent shot at their first Ivy victory next weekend when they visit struggling Cornell, but strange things would have to happen for them to have a shot at the championship. A highlight of the season has been the superb play of goalie Josh Weiner, who leads the league with 4.82 saves per game.

6.

Cornell (6-3-4, 0-2-1): The Big Red’s defense has been solid this season, but unfortunately its offense hasn’t been contributing many goals. As a result, Cornell has been involved in nothing but low-scoring games and has not put up multiple goals in the same contest since Sept. 18. The offensive struggles are not exactly the result of trouble getting possession — Cornell leads the Ivy League in shots per game but is last in the league in goals per game.

7.

8.

Dartmouth (4-3-4, 0-3): Though it hasn’t lost a non-Ivy game this season, the Big Green has yet to win its first league match. Dartmouth looked to have Princeton beat before the Tigers came back to win in the second half in Hanover, but since then things have only gotten worse. Yale defeated the Big Green 1-0 in a double-overtime affair earlier this month, and Penn also shut Dartmouth out in its most recent Ivy game.

Tweet of the day

Follow us

Trivia

‘Racing the incoming rain on this walk to lift’

‘Prince’ Sports is on Twitter! Follow us at

Former men’s basketball head coach Franklin “Cappy” Cappon was such a strict disciplinarian that he would not let his offense shoot until it had passed at least five times — he considered fast breaks a sign of a lack of discipline.

www.twitter.com/princesports junior CeCe Coffey, of the women’s water polo team, on twitter (@coffeybuzz5)

for live news and reports!