1 FEATURES, 4
FEATURES, 5
GALLERY, 6-7
EDITORIAL, 11
Brass bands unite community through music and activism
Massachusetts volunteers assist Florida’s hurricane crisis
Protests, memorials for first anniversary of Oct. 7
Gen Z isn’t unemployable — we just weren’t prepared for this
CELEBRATIN G
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2024
OVE R
50
YE A RS
O F
I N DE PE N DE N T
STU D E NT
J O U R NA LI S M
THE INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER AT BOSTON UNIVERSITY
YEAR LV. VOLUME A. ISSUE III
UPDATE: COM professor formerly on paid leave, no longer teaching at BU Bostonians rally, BY CRYSTAL YORMICK Campus Co-Editor AND MAYA MITCHELL Investigative Editor
College of Communication professor Tinker Ready no longer works at Boston University, following an investigation by the Equal Opportunity Office. The
investigation, which was updated and shared with Ready in May, found that she violated the EOO’s Prohibition on Retaliation Policy, according to documents obtained by The Daily Free Press. The EOO opened an investigation into Ready following her actions toward now-sophomore Shelby Rose Long, who was a student in her spring Introduction to
Communication Writing class. At this time, The Daily Free Press is unable to verify if Ready resigned from her position or if she was fired by the University. In March, The Daily Free Press reported Long filed a complaint with COM against Ready. The complaint, filed on Jan. 26, alleged Ready made comments displaying “inappropriate or prejudiced behavior” in the class,
HOLLY GUSTAVSEN | DFP PHOTOGRAPHER
888 Commonwealth Avenue, which is where the Equal Opportunity Office is located. College of Communication professor Tinker Ready is no longer employed by Boston University, following an investigation, which found that she violated the EOO’s Prohibition on Retaliation Policy.
also called CO 201. According to the final report, Ready said to Long on Feb. 20, “Can you not be a f—king b-tch for the rest of the semester?” during a conversation in the hallway. This comment spurred Long to file a report against Ready through the EOO the same day, which started an investigation. This incident, and a comment Ready made on one of Long’s YouTube videos, led EOO to determine Ready violated the office’s retaliation policy. In the policy, it is “illegal” to “retaliate against a person for filing a complaint or cooperating in an investigation.” EOO determines Ready violated policy The EOO defines retaliation as “conduct taken against an individual that has substantial and material adverse effect on that person’s living, learning or working environment” in its report. The EOO determines if its Prohibition on Retaliation Policy was broken by concluding 1) if the person who experienced retaliation — in this case, Long — participated in a “protected activity;” 2) if that person’s living, learning or working environment was affected due to circumstances surrounding an investigation; and 3) if the potential violator — Ready — affected at least one of these environments because the person’s participation in the protected activity. CONTINUED ON PAGE 9
Students emphasize importance of casting Nov. BU’s college ballot, criticize those withholding votes in protest ranking improves as admissions officers, students critique system
BY AMIL COUTINHO AMADO Contributing Writer AND CRYSTAL YORMICK Campus Co-Editor
Boston University students and faculty are stressing the importance of voting this November in light of a recent movement to withhold votes in protest of the 2024 Presidential Election. In a WBUR poll published on Sept. 23, 31% of poll respondents answered “yes” when “asked if the country is headed in the right direction.” The poll credited younger voters as being the most “critical” when it came to the future of the United States. The poll consisted of 800 likely voters in Massachusetts, and was conducted from Sept. 12-18 by the MassINC Polling Group with funding from the Knight Election Hub, according to WBUR. Arjun Vishwanath, an assistant professor of political science at BU, said 31% is higher than he would have guessed. “A lot of people, when they take these surveys, they oftentimes tend to think more negatively,” Vishwanath said. “[They might] think that things
BY SAANVI HARIDAS Contributing Writer
SARAH CRUZ | DFP PHOTOGRAPHER
A ballot drop box outside of the Honan-Allston Branch of the Boston Public Library. In lieu of voter’s disappointment with the U.S. presidential candidates stance on the Israel-Hamas war, some Bostonians are planning to vote uncommitted for the democratic party.
are going in the wrong direction, even if in a different context they might feel optimistic about the way things are going.” Jacob Brown, also an assistant political science professor, said polarized elections have bigger risks for the losing party. “When [there’s] a bigger difference between the two candidates, there’s a higher cost,
so to speak, to your side not winning,” Brown said. “That raises the stakes of the election and raises the incentive to vote.” With the Israel-Hamas war ongoing in the Middle East, a movement of “uncommitted” voters has risen across the country. This movement is in protest of the Biden-Harris administration’s lack of intervention in Gaza.
reflect on one year since Oct. 7 attacks BY LEIA GREEN Associate City Editor
AMIL COUTINHO AMADO Contributing Writer AND JEWEL SILVA Contributing Writer
Advocates and allies across Boston gathered at protests, vigils and memorial events on Oct. 6 and 7 to mark the first anniversary of the Hamas attack on Israel that reignited global focus on the deep-rooted IsraelPalestine conflict. A year ago Monday, the militant group Hamas invaded Israel, killed more than 1,200 civilians and foreign nationals and took another 251 hostage, according to the United States Congressional Research Service. Since then, the Israel-Hamas conflict has resulted in more than 41,000 Palestinian deaths and displaced approximately 90% of Gaza’s population, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry. In response, college campuses and community spaces in cities across the U.S. became hotspots for pro-Israel and pro-Palestine activism over the next year. This week, events in solidarity with both Israel and Palestine occurred throughout Boston and reflected the myriad of perspectives surrounding the ongoing conflict. CONTINUED ON PAGE 3
Gun reform advocates celebrate Healey’s emergency implementation of H.4885, opposition looks to repeal BY ELIZABETH MEHLER Contributing Writer
The college ranking system has lost value among both students and universities, according to a recent survey from international educational service organization Kaplan. The study found 75% of 200 surveyed college admissions officers believe the system has become prestigious. The results, announced on Sept. 24, follow the release of the 2025 U.S. News Best Colleges Rankings list. Discussions about the relevance and importance of college rankings have increased, as several top universities such as Columbia University, Harvard Law School and Yale Law School voiced their disapproval of the ranking process and opted out of the rankings entirely. According to the Kaplan survey, 13% of the colleges that currently participate in the ranking system are either considering dropping out or will drop out of the ranking process.
Boston government officials and student activists against gun violence celebrated the emergency passage of a state law that will implement sweeping gun reforms on Wednesday. In response, some residents and community leaders criticized the legislation with a push to repeal it in 2026. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey signed an “emergency preamble” on Wednesday that immediately implemented H.4885, “An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws.” The law cracks down on the selling of privately made, unserialized “ghost guns” and criminalizes the possession of gun parts such as bump stocks and trigger cranks, according to Boston 25 News. It also requires applicants for a gun license to complete live-fire training.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
CONTINUED ON PAGE 3