NEWS Ballot Question 1 would allow smaller casinos in southern Mass. to operate slot machines. p. 3
INBIZ Forbes has brought their largest Under 30 Summit ever to Boston in the midst of our chilly Northeastern autumn, to be held Sunday through Wednesday. p. 5
50°/69° CLOUDY
SPORTS Looking to avenge last season’s loss in the NCAA Tournament, men’s hockey heads to the Rocky Mountains this weekend for games at Denver. p. 12
DAILYFREEPRESS.COM @DAILYFREEPRESS
(FORECAST.IO)
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2016 THE INDEPENDENT WEEKLY STUDENT NEWSPAPER AT BOSTON UNIVERSITY YEAR XLV. VOLUME XCI. ISSUE VI.
BU Professors’ Political Party Affiliations Students at local
Econ Journal Watch's study found far more BU social sciences professors are registered as Democrats, as opposed to Republicans 35 35 3 Republican 31 31 30
Not Registered 63 Democrat 119
25
Not Affiliated 59
BY BREANNE KOVATCH DAILY FREE PRESS CONTRIBUTOR
20 15
14 8
10 5 0
1
0
0
1
1
Ps gy lo ho yc
w La m lis na ur Jo y or st Hi ics om on Ec
This graph depicts the ratio of BU professors who registered as Democrat versus those who identify as Republican in various social science subjects. BACKGROUND IMAGE COURTESY WIKIMEDIA COMMONS; GRAPHIC BY CAROLINE HITESMAN AND SHIVANI PATEL/ DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF
BU professors build safe space in election year BY MADDIE DOMENICHELLA DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF
As the 2016 presidential election is stepping into countdown mode, many Boston University students may soon cast out their first vote ever. Yet one can’t help but wonder — will what professors say in class impact their students’ political ideology? Anna Brett, a sophomore in the College of General Studies, doesn’t think
so. She said while BU professors tend to be more liberal, they do not impose their personal belief on the students, nor would students be easily persuaded. “In my writing for communications class, all political views are addressed,” she said. “Personally, what a professor says does not influence my political opinions.” The ratio of BU social sciences professors registered as Democrats to those registered as Republicans is 40 to 1, according to a study published in the September is-
sue of Econ Journal Watch. The study examined the voter registration and official party affiliation of 7,243 professors from 40 leading universities across the nation. It specifically focused on professors in economics, history, journalism, communications, law and psychology departments. Out of those surveyed by the study, BU had one of the largest Democrat-to-ReCONTINUED ON PAGE 4
Group calls on Aramark to stop chicken abuse BY ELLIE FRENCH DAILY FREE PRESS CONTRIBUTOR
Aramark, the second largest foodservice provider in the United States and the provider of poultry to campuses across the country, including Boston University, made its way into the national spotlight recently, as an online petition against Aramark has garnered more than 70,000 signatures over the past two weeks. The petition is part of a campaign led by The Humane League, a nonprofit organization that works to better the treatment of farm animals. The campaign is working to combat alleged abusive treatment of chickens at Aramark, said Taylor Ford, the corporate campaigns manager at The Humane League. Ford said the League reached out to Aramark six months ago, and, after receiving no response, decided to take their campaign public. The petition calls for Aramark to adopt a meaningful animal welfare policy that spares chickens from the abuses they currently endure in the company’s supply chain. Aramark’s animal welfare policy states the company is looking into these issues, but Ford said that the policy has no actionable items, nor does the company have any timeline to implement the policy. “While no company is perfect, we do see that other foodservice providers seem to
PHOTO ILLUSTRATION BY RHIANNON JESELONIS/ DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF
An online petition led by The Humane League urges Aramark, Boston University’s poultry provider, to adopt better policies for the treatment of chicken
take sustainability and animal welfare initiatives a little more seriously,” Ford said. “When a foodservice provider is willing to work productively with nonprofits like the Humane League, that’s really impactful.” The campaign has three major demands: enriching chickens’ environment with natural light and reduced stocking density, moving to slower growing species of birds to eliminate injuries caused by excessive growth and transitioning from live-shack-
universities push schools to divest
ling slaughter to more humane methods, according to the campaign’s change.org page. BU is among the institutions that The Humane League has asked to implore Aramark to change their policies. The group is currently in the process of reaching out to student groups on campus to achieve that objective, Ford said. Nicole Maldonado, a freshman in the CONTINUED ON PAGE 3
The Massachusetts Appeals Court last week dismissed the Harvard Climate Justice Coalition’s lawsuit against the Harvard Corporation’s investment in fossil fuels, according to Divest Harvard officials. It was a decision not unfamiliar to divestment advocates in Greater Boston. Many student-run divestment organizations have been calling for their universities to stop investing in fossil fuel companies over the last few years. Both Boston University and Northeastern University student groups have held rallies and protests since the beginning of the school year to encourage their respective schools to divest from fossil fuels. Nathan Phillips, a professor in the Earth and Environment department at BU and a faculty affiliate for Divest BU, said the movement came about because college students are aware of what is happening to the environment and they believe change needs to happen quickly. “The leadership and the push has really come from students,” Phillips said. “The older generation is more hand-wringing and unable to appreciate how fast we need to move. In terms of the theory of change, young people have seen, with the revolution in social networks and technological and communication systems, how fast things can move.” The Harvard Climate Justice Coalition drove the legal push for Divest Harvard, a student-run organization at Harvard advocating for the divestment from fossil fuels, according to Naima Drecker-Waxman, the co-coordinator of Divest Harvard. “[Harvard Climate Justice Alliance] began a lawsuit against Harvard on the basis that Harvard was not fulfilling its requirement to its mission as a charity because it was putting the charity at risk with … immoral investments,” Drecker-Waxman said. Drecker-Waxman explained the lawsuit was not allowed to go forward because the court ruled the relationship the students had with Harvard as a nonprofit organization was not enough to qualify them to sue the university over its charitable standing. Harvard University was unavailable to comment on the lawsuit. BU settled on a course of action leaning toward divestment in late September, The Daily Free Press reported on Sept. 20. In an email sent to the members of the BU community, President Robert Brown wrote that the university will “commit, on a best efforts basis, to avoid investing in coal and tar sands extractors.” However, the Divest BU student movement believes the fight for divestment isn’t over yet. The email sent by President Brown was vague, Divest BU President Matt Thacker said, as it promised the university will try to not invest in fossil fuel companies in the future without actually using the word “divest.” “To us, [the wording] doesn’t even sound like [the Board of Trustees] intend[s] to fully divest from even those smaller segments of the fossil fuel industry,” Thacker said. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2