2-4-2016

Page 1

NEWS Economics expert weighs in on decline of recent graduates’ unemployment rate p. 3

SPOTLIGHT Virgin Islands rescue dog finds Boston home after four and a half years p. 6

40°/59° LIGHT RAIN

SPORTS Blaise it up: the men’s basketball team beat Navy and now has a three-game winning streak p. 12

DAILYFREEPRESS.COM @DAILYFREEPRESS

(FORECAST.IO)

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2016 THE INDEPENDENT WEEKLY STUDENT NEWSPAPER AT BOSTON UNIVERSITY YEAR XLV. VOLUME XC. ISSUE III.

Two fraternities suspended, under investigation BY GRACE LI DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF

Boston University withdrew its recognition of the university’s chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha Dec. 9, 2015 for violation of the university’s “student organization policies,” according to PIKE International Fraternity spokesperson Brent Phillips. The university is also currently investigating the Lambda Chi Alpha’s BU chapter following the BU Interfraternity Council’s suspension, Assistant Dean of Students John Battaglino said. Administration is working with PIKE’s national chapter to bring PIKE at BU back as a healthy organization, Battaglino said, and will apply the same procedure to LCA if the ongoing investigation indicates a need to suspend the fraternity. Battaglino was unable to comment on the cause of the fraternities’ current status, and it is unknown when the university will conclude its investigation on LCA. “I would never comment about the details,” Battaglino said. “I don’t have the exact dates [of the investigation] in front of me.” IFC Vice President of Programming Patrick Ayer declined to comment on PIKE’s suspension and the university’s investigation regarding LCA. According to Phillips, PIKE is also under suspension from the International Fraternity. “During this administrative suspension, Lambda Nu Chapter must cease operations other than normal business meetings to discuss their current situation,” Phillips wrote in an email. “Chapter executive officers are developing a comprehensive action plan … to address operational deficiencies and restore the Chapter’s standing with the university and the Fraternity.” BU PIKE President Giancarlo Roselli said the fraternity is complying with the terms of loss or recognition and is working on a plan to present to the university and the International Fraternity. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2

PHOTO BY BRIAN SONG/DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF

Friday morning, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s lawyers began the appeal process to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to overturn his conviction and death sentence.

Tsarnaev defense team appeals to first circuit BY OLIVIA QUINTANA DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF

Lawyers for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev officially appealed Friday morning to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, according to Susan Goldberg, the circuit executive for the First Circuit Court of Appeals. Tsarnaev was sentenced to death after he was found guilty on 30 counts for the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, which killed three and injured more than 260, The Daily Free Press reported on May 16, 2015. Daniel Medwed, a Northeastern Uni-

versity law professor, explained in an email the process that cases follow as they move forward after an initial trial. “There are typically three phases of litigation after trial: the motion stage, where the defendant makes claims back in the trial court — [U.S. District] Judge [George] O’Toole just resolved them and issued the restitution order; the direct appeal in the intermediate appellate court, in this instance, the First Circuit; and then the post-conviction or collateral petition phase,” Medwed wrote in the email. After Tsarnaev’s lawyers requested a new trial, O’Toole denied the motion and ordered Tsarnaev to pay more than $101 million in restitution to the victims of the

bombing, The Daily Free Press reported on Jan. 20, 2016. Medwed noted that this request for a new trial is a necessary step for Tsarnaev’s lawyers in order for them to file for an appeal. “The current appeal is called a direct appeal because it directly attacks what happened at trial,” Medwed wrote in an email. “A defendant cannot bring in new evidence, or even generally raise new issues, that were not presented below. It truly constitutes a review of the trial and post-trial motion record by a higher court.” David Rossman, a professor in Boston CONTINUED ON PAGE 4

Sen. Warren releases report criticizing criminal justice system BY KENNEDY DAVIS AND CAROLINE HITESMAN DAILY FREE PRESS STAFF

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren released a thirteen-page report Friday, entitled “Rigged Justice: How Weak Enforcement Lets Corporate Offenders Off Easy,” which argues against weak law enforcement for corporate crime. The report details 20 cases in 2015 where federal agencies failed to properly punish corporate offenders. Relaxed law enforcement, especially toward white-collar crime, enforces the idea to corporate offenders that they are not obligated to answer to the law, Warren said in a Friday press release. “When government regulators and prosecutors fail to pursue big corporations or their executives who violate the law, or when the gov-

ernment lets them off with a slap on the wrist, corporate criminals have free rein to operate outside the law,” Warren said in the release. Warren also said in the release that enforcing laws is just as significant as enacting laws. “Putting a law on the books is only the first step,” Warren said in the release. “The second, and equally important, step is enforcing that law. A law that is not enforced — or weakly enforced — may as well not even be a law at all.” Tamar Frankel, a professor in Boston University’s School of Law who teaches corporate governance, said it is difficult to hold corporate offenders accountable because of the large size of their companies. “When you have very large corporations, it’s impossible for the top or the bottom or anybody to really control specific activities,” Frankel said. Frankel said as a result, corporate cases are

handled differently from other cases. “The attitude inside a corporation is different from the attitude of the law, and that is where the problem lies,” Frankel said. “We have assumed that the law within the corporation is the law within the country, and that isn’t so.” Frankel said in order to put corporate offenders on the same playing field as others, the United States must make proper sentencing the norm. “And what we should do there, and [what] is being done, is look at some bad apples, look at some slippery slopes, look at where things are going to happen if they continue that way,” Frankel said. Shea Cronin, a criminal justice professor in BU’s Metropolitan College, said the U.S. government needs to heighten standards in order to decrease the number of unpunished corporate offenses. “The threat of regulatory oversight from

the federal government is probably not sufficient to deter wrongdoing,” Cronin said. “Everybody accepts that the primary goal here is to promote compliance with particular rules, and I’m not sure the negotiated punishments we have seen or the settlements that we have seen are changing the calculus that corporations engage in.” Cornelius Hurley, director of the Center for Finance, Law & Policy, explained that in particular, banks are able to take advantage of the justice system in a way that is harmful to tax-paying citizens. “Through the intercession of their regulators, we have made large banks not merely too big to fail, but immune from the consequences of their criminal acts,” Hurley said. “Such immunity only serves to encourage riskier activities by the largest financial institutions, leaving CONTINUED ON PAGE 4


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.