Gen Z Changes the Workplace
Cinderella the Opera, at CWU
Page 4
Page 6
Vol. 133 NO. 2
The 20th annual Parade of Nations Page 9 April 23, 2026
‘B OT TO H IR E TWO CONS ULTA NTS TO REBUILD TRUST’ AND REWORK SHARED GOVERNANCE; FACULTY EXPRESS CONCERN OVER HIRING PROCESS
Parker Wood Sports Editor
A
t a Faculty Senate Executive Committee (FSEC) open meeting on April 15, faculty members had a chance to bring up concerns to the FSEC. One of the main concerns raised was the proposal to hire the consultant that the Board of Trustees (BoT) said they were planning in order to ‘rebuild the trust’ between the faculty and President Jim Wohlpart. The Executive Committee revealed that the BoT plans to hire two different consultants. Professor of Sociology and former Interim Dean of the College of the Sciences (COTS) Mike Harrod joined Mathematics professor and Interim chair of the Computer Science department Tim Englund, along with four others, at the FSEC’s open meeting to bring up different concerns around campus. Harrod said he was concerned that the hiring of the consultant wasn’t public. “I was wondering if we know or can get access to the RFP (Request for Proposal) for the consultant,” Harrod asked. An RFP is a document that requests the proposal of a service by a company. Harrod continued, “That should be a public process.” Professor of Child Development and Family Science and Faculty Senate Chair-Elect Amy Claridge answered Harrod’s question and explained what the FSEC knew about the process. “We haven’t seen the RFP’s either,” Clar-
idge stated. Harrod said that if the hiring isn’t using state money, the BoT probably doesn’t need to follow the rules when it comes to RFP’s. Claridge and Lindsey corrected, stating that if the BoT spent over a certain amount, they would have to do an RFP. Executive Committee Chair Natashia Lindsey expanded on the details of the BoT’s plan, stating, “There’s going to be a consultant that’s going to come in and work with the BoT, AAC (Academic Affairs Committee) and the EC on Shared Governance stuff.” Lindsey continued, “And there’s going to be a consultant to come in and help us work on building trust.” David Leder, associate director of strategic communications, responded to a request for further information about the RFP process from The Observer. “The Board
“The Board has been vetting a number of possible consultants with higher education through the Request For Proposal process. More information will be shared with the university community soon.” - David Leder
Strategic Communications
has been vetting a number of possible consultants with higher education through the Request For Proposal process. More information will be shared with the universi-
ty community soon,” Leder stated. “RFP’s usually take a while to complete.” Leder declined to comment on the recent protest that the faculty had hosted. Claridge spoke about what the FSEC knew of the consultants. “We know very little about the second one, the trust-building one, because Zabrina (Jenkins) is running that and she’s a trustee, but she hasn’t, as far as we know, talked to any faculty at all in her development of it. So that’s concerning,” Claridge said. “They (BoT) made it sound like … they’re trying to contract somebody for at least a year. I think the other one, it seemed like it was a little bit short-term.” Other issues brought up during the meeting were the bike lockers outside Samuelson Hall being inaccessible to students, proposing a longer spring break so professors have more time to prepare for the spring quarter, the rates at the Early Childhood Learning Center increasing and the expiration of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program and student internship rules. READ MORE ON THE APRIL 9 FACULTY PROTEST HERE