pg. 4-5
pg. 6
pg. 7
pg. 8
Ramadan Diversity
Opinion
Sports
Events
April 27, 2022
Vol. 122 NO. 4
By the students, for the students
CWU changes
room and board rates SINGLE ROOM SUITE-STYLE ROOM
SHARED ROOM
2021-22
2022-23
2021-22
2022-23
2021-22
2022-23
$ 6 5 9 2
$ 7 7 0 0
$ 9 9 9 7
$ 9 5 3 2
$ 8 0 0 6
$ 8 2 4 1
Data sourced from CWU’s housing webpage, Graphic by Sarah Stewart
By Wayne Gray Staff Reporter Housing changed to a “Same Rate, Same Room” policy which may simplify room and board for some, but increase housing costs for others. CWU recently changed its pricing model for the 2022-2023 academic year in order to simplify room and board rates for students, according to Jenna Hyatt, the associate dean of student living. “At one point we had over 10 different rate types and so this whole program and process was to simplify it for our students,” Hyatt said. According to the residence hall information on CWU’s housing webpage, there will be three types of rooms available: single, suite and shared. Previously, the 2021-2022 room and board rates distinguished room differences such as bathrooms or hall location; the new pricing model does not. 2022-2023 annual room and board rates will be $7,700 for a shared room, $8,241 for a suite-style and $9,532 for a single. Hyatt said the new room rates will give students
flexibility to choose rooms based on preference or needs. This could benefit those students who opted for more expensive rooms in the 2021-2022 academic year; they could now get the same room for a lower rate. According to the room and board rates for 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, a single room suite that would have been $9,997 will now be $465 less. This move may also impose extra costs on those students who would have opted for a lower priced room provided in 2021-2022 room and board rates and planned to do the same this year. According to the 2021-2022 rates, a standard shared room that would have cost $6,952 will now cost $7,700, a $748 increase. Selecting a standard single room, a room that was $8,006 in 2021-2022, will now cost $9,532 for the 2022-2023 academic year. For some students, this $1,526 increase in room rates may have an impact on their personal finances. Hyatt said these cost differences should be mitigated by the amount of financial aid that students receive due to increased cost of attendance.
Hyatt said CWU will be awarding $1,000 scholarships each year to incoming students in the upcoming fall quarter who commit to living in student housing for two years. Hyatt said this move could reduce the impact of housing costs for students as well. “This whole system and rate structure was designed to really be able to support and provide access and equity to our students,” Hyatt said. According to Hyatt, CWU has also made changes to contracts for student apartments. Students will now be signing for a bed rather than leasing the space. Hyatt said this change will get rid of the liability that was placed on students in prior leases. The contract lengths would be for an academic year rather than based on the calendar year. “They’re not responsible for finding the other leaseholder in that space,” Hyatt said. “It’s like a contract, like in a residence hall, so if it remains vacant they’re not paying for that other bed.” Hyatt said these moves could be seen as part of a recruiting campaign. Hyatt said she believes these changes are the right thing to do.
Letter to the Editor: From Student Press Freedom Initiative CWU’s assertion that the recent administrative confiscation of copies of The Observer during CWU Preview Day “could have been handled differently” is a laughable understatement. When College of Business dean Jeffrey Stinson and associate dean Keke “Coco” Wu stole stacks of newspapers with the intention of throwing them in the recycling, they violated the First Amendment. So, yes. It should have been “handled differently.” The law requires that it be handled differently. And that’s exactly what I told CWU this week in a letter addressed to President Wohlpart. At the Student Press Freedom Initiative — a project of the nonpartisan, nonprofit Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, where I work defending the rights of student journal-
did in reporting on CWU’s financial status. Courts have recognized this essential role by making clear that, when administrators steal or otherwise censor student publications because they are unhappy with content, they violate the First Amendment. In Washington, where the New Voices Act strengthens the free press rights of student newspapers, these actions also violate state law. The fact that Stinson and Wu were motivated by distaste for The Observer’s coverage of CWU’s budget woes makes the situation worse still. (You may recall that, in the presence of a Observer staffer, Wu remarked: “Why did [The Observer] think it was smart to print that story on the day that we have so many students coming to campus?”, later telling The Observer the removal was part
“We urge CWU to ... educate staff about their legal obligations and the importance of a free press.”
Lindsie Rank
ists — we see these instances of newspaper theft far too often. But it’s relatively rare that university officials are the culprits — and even rarer they are so brazen when they violate the First Amendment. While theft is theft (and, make no mistake, even stealing entire stacks of free newspapers can be criminally prosecuted), it’s especially egregious when carried out by public university administrators, who are government actors. Independent student journalism is essential to the operation of public universities. Publications like The Observer serve a watchdog role by informing the public of how, for example, administrators use (or misuse) public funds. This is exactly what The Observer
of CWU’s plan to “present our prospective students and guests with a positive portrayal and outlook of the college and university.”) This is what we First Amendment lawyers call “viewpoint discrimination,” which occurs when an official censors content because they disagree with the viewpoint espoused. We urge CWU to recognize the gravity of Stinson and Wu’s theft of stacks of The Observer and to educate staff about their legal obligations and the importance of a free press, so that something like this never happens again. Lindsie Rank Student Press Counsel, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education