pg. 3
pg. 4-5
Diversity
pg. 7
Scene
pg. 8
Sports
Events
April 13, 2022
Vol. 122 NO. 2
By the students, for the students
Editorial: Censorship is alive and well
Business administration discarded The Observer By Star Diavolikis Editor-in-Chief Over the past weekend, we received a report of the College of Business Dean Jeffrey Stinson and Associate Dean Keke “Coco” Wu actively attempting to throw our papers in Shaw-Smyser into a recycling bin in response to our budget story that reported on 2023 budget cuts. It is disheartening our paper was discarded in an attempt to make the university appear in a positive light. Stinson said out loud, while walking with Wu, the Observer’s Social Media Editor Crystal Clausen and her coworker, “I’m going to put these papers in the recycling.” After being asked why the papers were being thrown away, Wu told Clausen, “Why did [The Observer] think it was smart to print that [budget] story on the day that we have so many students coming to campus?” We reached out to Wu and Stinson at the time of publication. Wu stated she was involved in a meeting that went past our deadline, so she declined to comment at the time; Stinson responded in an email. “In preparing our building for the CWU Preview Day on Saturday, I moved remaining copies of The Observer from the entry foyer,” the email stated. “Preview Day is critical to our recruitment efforts. Our desire is to present our prospective students and guests with a positive portrayal and outlook for the college and university. Our event day set-up and event delivery was organized to that effect.” The story in question regarding the 2023 budget was published one week ago. Vice President of Financial Affairs, Joel Klucking, provided information for this story and has not reached out regarding non factual details in the article. The budget is important to both the current CWU community and future CWU students.
Observer staff also witnessed incidents in the SURC where our paper was placed on the lowest shelf and another publication, the HYPE magazine, placed on top of ours. The Publicity Center confirmed they did not make this change. While we can’t confirm who did this in the SURC, two separate incidents against our paper in one day is upsetting. I spoke to the Student Press Law Center regarding this incident, and they confirmed it impedes us in many ways. There is monetary value to what the offenders did. The amount we paid for those copies to be printed, the money we pay our staff, the amount different groups paid for their ads to be in our paper and so on. I would like to take this time to give a reminder that censorship of the media is a real issue that should not happen to any
publication, let alone to a student publication from administration within their own university. The First Amendment is to have freedom of speech and freedom of the press. There is no justifiable excuse to attempt to censor our reporting. Our purpose is not to make people happy or to have the university, town or state look amazing. We are reporting on the facts of our campus community. Reaching out to us by either a phone call or email is the correct form of action if upset, not throwing away our paper. You may also write a Letter to the Editor that will be published, and if necessary, we will have a response published with it. Please know this is not going to make us alter our reporting in any way, shape or form. Our publication is here to present necessary information to the public. We are here to stay.
Photo by Crystal Clausen/The Observer, The shelf stands empty after the College of Business Dean and Associate Dean recyled copies of the paper on preview day.
Ellensburg speaks up against librarian cuts Photo by Brevin Ross/The Observer, Ellensburg School Disctrict reduces library staff, causing concerns among community memebers and district staff.
By Wayne Gray Staf Reporter Certified librarians in the Ellensburg School District have been reduced due to budget cuts. Employees are speaking out, even if it means someone else does the talking. The decision to reduce library staff was due to budget concerns. This decision has been a point of criticism from the public and students alike. Mary Gordon, a former teacher, is leading the effort to oppose the district’s decision. She leads a group of at least 85 community members and district employees, in an effort to convince the district to reverse their decision concerning librarians. “We’re just trying to do everything we can to save our librarians in the Ellensburg school district,” Gordon said. Gordon also stated that there has been little communication from the school board in response to the community’s concerns. “You receive a form letter, everyone receives the same form letter, so there really is no conversation,” Gordon said. “We’ve resorted to going and speaking at the board meetings.” Gordon said that communication issues with the school district have been so pervasive that she maintains a private email list so that district employees have a safe outlet for their concerns. “There are people, who are teachers, who joined my email group, who created entirely new email addresses on Gmail so they could join,” Gordon said. “People
don’t do that who feel comfortable speaking out.” At the school board meeting on April 6, when the floor was open to public comment, some speakers claimed to be acting as proxies, speaking on behalf of district employees. One speaker, Barb Goll, read from a letter written by an anonymous district employee that said, “I am writing you anonymously through a third party willing to share my thoughts … because there is a culture of fear spreading within Ellensburg school district.” After 30 minutes of public comments, most of which were statements read from letters written by anonymous district employees, the board closed the floor to public comment. Meanwhile, the district is also moving to convert traditional school libraries to technology centers. “Every student is provided a Chromebook,” Layla Breckon, an Ellensburg High School senior, said. “I can’t understand how adding a technology center, instead of a traditional library, is a benefit when we already have technology at our fingertips.” While the school district claims that these changes may be temporary, with a possible reinstatement of the reduced librarian positions in the future as district finances improve, some are not so optimistic. When asked about the district’s move, Gordon said these types of changes are typically permanent. “I really don’t think we’re going to get librarians back,” Gordon said.